Totally agree with all your points. Bought an R6 as a hybrid upgrade, it died from heat stress, so ended up selling it back to the shop and went dedicated cinema camera. Got the 5D II off the shelf, just shot a festival with it, gorgeous pics. The 5D set a standard of excellence that is genuinely professional. Enough resolution for a Vogue magazine double page spread. Video suitable for cinema. It can do it. It feels like it can do it for a hundred years. It was nice to hear you discuss the colour. I've had mIne so long I just thought all cameras did this.
100% agree. I've had a 5Dmkii for past 3 years and have achieved some breathtaking images. I've had the R5 for about 3 months and to be honest I always find myself going back to the 5D. It's like a an old comfortable pair of slippers. Still an excellent camera in 2022.
Yeah, the deals are awesome! I also got a 5Dmkii with 3500 shutter clicks for $399. It was a backup camera and looks brand new. I don't need anything better.
I ran a 5D2 as my main camera for 10 years, I'm now onto the 5D4 which I absolutely love but there's just something that feels 'right' whenever I pick my old mk2 up. Maybe it's just the familiarity and being 'at one' with it after all these years, but it just feels right. And, DR aside as you've mentioned, I still think it's an incredibly capable camera when it comes to the actual images it produces. I also know exactly what you mean when you talk about the shooting experience, I think it's amazing how far camera tech has evolved but I also can't help feeling it's taken some of the satisfaction out of nailing situations that are technically challenging. I'd also argue that if you've only ever used mirrorless cameras with the latest versions of DPAF you're probably not developing the skills that you really should be as a photographer.
Hi Paul, yes id probably agree with you there that learning on a dslr is more beneficial, i think mirrorless really brings the advantages as soon as you throw video into the mix but the 5d ii is really special.
The old 4/3 and m4/3 sensors have an optical density of 315 dpi. The newer 350 dpi while the Canon 5D only 72 dpi (Apple Mac 1984 standard 🤣 ). In practice, if you do not make large prints, it makes no sense to take pictures more than 5mpx because it is enough even for a 4K screen. Resolutions of the order of 8-20mpx are needed only for large photos and posters.
@@AriusNowak dpi has no relevance whatsoever to computer monitors or camera sensors, it's only a factor when we talk about printing. The way you're approaching this is unfortunately rather flawed.
@@AriusNowak8mp is 4k monitor resolution. How large do those big tv look sharp? Yeah, you don't need that many pixels for the real world. But in practice higher resolution also doesn't matter. Noise doesn't go up at the same enlargement, it just has more fine detail hidden in that noise.
Definitely a thumbs up for having multiple cameras, I wish more photographers would do this instead of getting stuck in one system. I've spent thousands on all the new Fuji gear, I shoot film on load of old Pentax stuff which cost me peanuts. Then 3 months ago I bought a 5D Mark II because I saw one going for £150. I haven't been able to put it down since and absolutely love the look and colours coming out of it, especially with vintage manual focus lenses. Even shooting raw, I'm seeing things in Lightroom that I just don't get with my Fuji gear, and I do love the Fuji look but this old Canon camera just has some magic about it. Can't say I've noticed any real limitations as far as dynamic range goes, although to my eyes nothing compares to film, but between digital cameras I think it's largely a myth.
Thanks Pete, well im glad you are having a good experience with the 5d ii thats good to hear. Its one of those cameras where when you get home and look the pictures they look better than on the back of the camera and just makes you smile.
I recently bought a 5D II again. I owned one in 2018 and regret that I sold it. The files are just beautiful. I have a 6D coming soon, very exciting comparing the two cameras.
@@verycooltony the good thing is, I never tried mirrorless. I only know Canon DSLRs. I have a large collection of cameras and I really enjoy shooting them. I am very excited to get the 6D. My next goal is a 5D Classic.
@@luigicorleone1389 The classic has the best robustness and ergonomics out of the three in my opinion (and colours ofc). The 6d is your best compromise in my opinion if you want a slightly more modern camera over the 5d (classic). The 6d's dynamic range and iso performance is amazing. But the classic is my favourite.
Luigi, youll like both of them, they have a different look, the 6d is more modern but the 5dii has a different look to it which is in its own way really great too.
Just bought one with a 50mm 1.8 for $200. Couldn’t be happier. I’ve owned many cameras from the 1dx line to 5d3, Fuji/sony mirrorless etc etc and after 7 years, I forgot how much I love the older canon dslrs. Cant wait to play more with this one
Started digital photography back in 2006 with a Sony alpha a200, then got a Canon t1i. Upgraded from the t1i to a 7d and hopefully this week getting my first full frame with a 5d mk2 😊
I still use mine regularly. It’s not my only camera but it’s my only full frame camera and I don’t feel the need for a new one. Centre focus spot and recompose works great. It’s fast enough for my needs.
I bought one today. Low shutter count. No signs of use for around $300. Judging from previous comments the price may have bottomed out. My son just bought a 1Dx mark II for about $1500 with 8000 shutter count in mint condition. He shoots concerts. It will be his second rig along with an EOS R. I'm anxious to see how it performs for him.
I used to have this one when I worked as a profesional portrait photographer. I love it!! It's not for sports and fast moving things, but with good lenses it's wonderfull!! And when it came out 15 years ago it was about 3000 USD. I just got one now for 180 USD!! Worth every penny! :)
The 5D Mk.2 looks like a good camera for most situations , and is very good value on the 2nd hand market . I got one for a friend , in what I suspect was unused condition ( seems a kit had been split up and the 24 - 105 zoom sold separately) . My friend loves this camera , and is taking excellent macro pictures with it combined with a 105 macro lens .
Thanks so much for this Martin. I have the 5D, 5D mkII, and a 6D and I absolutely love them all. I learned photography in my teens shooting film and the 5D is especially comfortable for me because of it’s simplicity and the fantastic images that can be produced. I really appreciate that you point out that it isn’t necessary to have the latest and greatest kit. Truthfully, many of the bells and whistles that are found on the newest cameras are never actually put to use by their owners anyway.
The old 4/3 and m4/3 sensors have an optical density of 315 dpi. The newer 350 dpi while the Canon 5D only 72 dpi (Apple Mac 1984 standard 🤣 ). In practice, if you do not make large prints, it makes no sense to take pictures more than 5mpx because it is enough even for a 4K screen. Resolutions of the order of 8-20mpx are needed only for large photos and posters.
Hello! I too have a 5D mkii with a 105 mm lens. I want to get into wildlife side of photography but I’m in a dilemma. My 5D works well, but is still quite old with low burst fps. Higher fps is important for capturing wildlife. After seeing this, I thought of purchasing a new camera but my budget only allows me to get either a Sony a7ii (2014) with the 28-70mm kit lens OR a Sony a6100 with 55-210mm kit lens. I cannot afford anything else more than this. This new camera with kit lens would run me about the same as a sigma 150-600mm lens for my 5D. So which one would you suggest: should I keep my 5D and invest in a good telephoto lens or buy a new camera camera and try with the kit lens for now? Thanks
@@bladewarm1969 Glass is always more important than body. The sigma with a 5D is going to be much better than the aps-c witht he kit lens... And 210mm is gonna be too short most of the time. If you really want another body made for wildlife along the 150-600, maybe have a look for a 7D or 7D mk2, they are no longer too expensive (look at mpb is you are in europe)
We used it as a hammer one time when i couldn't find the actual hammer near me in NZ. Door was fixed and the camera worked right there and then. It has a magnezium body contruction and while i might not recommend popping nails in the wood you could def do it. Fab camera!
Thanks Martin. I started with film SLRs in the early 90s and that is why I love the modern DSLR's. In 2022 I bought a 5D Mk1 and a Mk3 and have gotten to love them. I prefer the simplicity of the Mk1 however. I have two lenses, a 24-105 and a 70-300, which have image stabilisation and these two lenses cover my needs and my kit produces pin sharp landscape and nature shots. As for the question are these cameras still relevant today the answer is : you bet they are. They are awesome tools and using them feels like real photography. Looking forward to more of your videos. Good luck.
I really appreciate this video. I have almost just started as a pgotographer, learning everything, and bought a 5dii off FB marketplace. I desperately need to know how to use my camera and this is helping
Great video Martin! I love my 5D, and the mkii as well. It was my first full frame camera and it has literally taught me everything that I needed to know.
Excellent review, Martin, and great perspectives. We are always pulled to the latest and greatest but, as you pointed out, it bears a cost; in this case the simple pleasures of being far more engaged in the process of shooting a satisfying image.
Thanks! Dear Martin, I am a big fan of your channel and have been following it for while now. I am more of a Nikon DSLR shooter ("advanced" amateur). I own 5 Nikon cameras: D80, D200, D700, D610 AND D7100. I have been really learning a lot from you and I love your portraits as well as your landscape photos and I am vey impressed by the way you edit these (very obvious and clear improvement on the landscape ones). I have quite a number of old Nikon lenses, mostly AF-D series (primes and zooms) and some manual focus primes (135 f3.5, 200 f4 and 300 f4.5). I just watched a video of yours about the 5D MKII and, although I am very, very happy with my Nikon gear, I would be curious to try either a 5D MKI or MKII (the colors on the your portraits using these cameras impresses me a lot!), maybe with an inexpensive nifty fifty. Anyways, sorry for the extensive comment but mostly I would like to thank you for the amazingly useful and pleasant to watch videos. All the best and Happy New Year!!!
Thanks Martin - Love that you're re-acquainting us with these great cameras of 'old' ... hahaha. Picked up a like new 5D classic earlier this year as my truly fun camera. I just purchased a 7D with 4K clicks on it for a song. That will be my introduction to wildlife camera ( I am ambitious). I can see a 5DII, 6D, and 40D in my future. Oh my... I am sounding like a hoarder, but at these crazy low prices it is almost a crime not to scoop these up while the scooping is good. I think they'll experience a bit of a price increase in the coming years as people begin to realize that their fancy pants phones and mirror-less cameras ( I have and like these also) can be a bit too automated and lack a certain tactile fun factor about them.
The old 4/3 and m4/3 sensors have an optical density of 315 dpi. The newer 350 dpi while the Canon 5D only 72 dpi (Apple Mac 1984 standard 🤣 ). In practice, if you do not make large prints, it makes no sense to take pictures more than 5mpx because it is enough even for a 4K screen. Resolutions of the order of 8-20mpx are needed only for large photos and posters.
Just this morning I was taking inside my home some casual comparison shots (RAW) between my 5D classic, 6D, and RP, all with the 40mm pancake. The 5D I believe produces the better-looking files to my eyes; the combination of crispness along with those soft fall-off transitions between lights and shadows created a very special “pop”, something like a “medium format effect” which goes beyond color adjustments🥹. Talking about color, I can easily tune the 6D colors to match those of the 5D, however the RP’s files took me much longer to adjust, they completely different from the start. Tomorrow I will make another between the 5D/6D with the 40mm vs the RP with the awesome RF 35mm IS, maybe that will be a different story.
Hi Ricardo, yes I agree I think the 5d classic is the best too, i think the weak low pass filter and pixel density give that look, 12mp is a sweet spot on full frame it seems for having this pop.
The old 4/3 and m4/3 sensors have an optical density of 315 dpi. The newer 350 dpi while the Canon 5D only 72 dpi (Apple Mac 1984 standard 🤣 ). In practice, if you do not make large prints, it makes no sense to take pictures more than 5mpx because it is enough even for a 4K screen. Resolutions of the order of 8-20mpx are needed only for large photos and posters.
ya you said it all ,,, & I really enjoy my mark 2 its a tank and fun to shoot i use a lot of m42's lens with it .. I like the old glass...i enjoyed your talking ...you have a good one ...gary
tank you for sharing your experiences. I bought a used 5d Markii today and cant await trying this camera. Its my first fullframe cam. I hope i can use my old manual film camera lenses (Fd und M42 mounts) successfully on it.
excellent video! I agree with you as I can't stand people claiming one can recreate any sensor/profile color from any camera based on any raw file since this is just not how it works in reality, you might come close with one image, but the next one fails entirely again
I have R5 and R62 and can't get the colors of my 5D2. I needed a third camera for a shoot the other day and it felt like going back to the stone age, but it just looks better. There is nothing I can do to the R5, even with the same lens that makes it look as natural as the 5D2. I just can't risk using the 5D2 because I work so much faster with the R5 and I know I got focus. There are some important moments with important people and you don't get second chances sometimes. I've been able to capture some amazing moments with a 50mm 1.2 that would have had me guessing and nervous with the 5D2. It's a shame Canon can't replicate these colors anymore. I had an R3 for a couple weeks an it did seem a bit better.
This is a great post Luke, ive often spoken of the differences when it comes to focus and certain features. It all just depends on what you are doing and the significance of it. Can you take mulitple shots or is it just a moment and then its gone. So you have to decide based on that. Ive seen many say the same things. So I think its best to stick to having all these cameras and choosing which ones to use given what you are trying to do with them.
I took your advice and just bought one today. I will continue to use my Leica Q2 but this looks like a good addition. I have never bought a camera body for $400. Love it. Your vid led me here so thanks! Now I am trying to figure out what prims are best. I picked up a 50mm and an 85mm...we shall see.
Hi Martin. I would just to stay that I have been taking pictures for 38 years, and without trying to embarris you I must say that that you're imaiges are some the best I've ever seen. The Steve Mccurry of landscape. Merry Christmas to you.
I have always loved the cameras that are the "first" of something. I feel like there is more...prestige?? in those than the MK1800's. ;) I live perfectly fine with my 5D2, my 6D, 70D and the first version of the EOS-M (with a firmware upgrade). :) I used to be employed as a portrait photographer. And I was handed the 5D MK2 with a 24-105 F4 L. That lens is not great. I ended up using my Sigma 24-105 F4 Art instead. But for portraits, the 5D is wonderful. Rigth now it has a EF 85 F1,8 on it. It's a tool...a good one.
I have the 5dii and EOS3 and it feels like I'm just changing medium not workflow. A fantastic camera to take photographs. Not pictures. Always surprises me. Yes it's limited but I quite like that, makes me have to think twice
Since everyone is mentioning cameras that have nothing to do with your vid, I use a Nikon 300D and love it; However, I feel Canon produces a better pic with less effort.
Great video. Your explanations are informative and artful at once. It's good to get the creative experience along with the technical impression of a camera. I'm just about to hit purchase on one of these.
I had previously C5dclassic, 7dmk1, I have 5dm3 and bought recently just for fun C40d yes is only 10.2 megapixel but sound of shutter and feeling amazing. Also bought recently Nikon d700 just to try. All mirrorless camera which one I try don't have this vibe and artificial viewfinder push me off. Maybe in the future will try Fujifilm xt3 is still mirrorless but few film simulation so good to try.
Still have mine from when I bought it when it came out. Rented a Mark 3 when that came out it made no difference. Same with the Mark IV. I lost interest when the R series came out and Canon screwed me over again (first time when abandoning the FD lenses). My next camera will be a Leica. Meanwhile, the 5D II with a 50L and 135L does everything I want.
Enjoy watching your content and reviews of these old Canon cameras. Your photograph in this video is well framed too. In simple single point AF shooting these old dslr's are faster than mirrorless. My two cents.
Nice review. I still use my 5D2... and love it. Sure... I wish it was 50mp with options to print large... but its a great body. Curious if you use Magic Lantern to open up the capabilities or not... and if you have done a video with ML and the 5D2? Bravo!
Very nice video, Martin, you're spot on, I think! I like the more natural outcome of the 5d mark ii, too much dynamic range often gives an artificial look. I like that it's sturdy when I want that, like today I travelled and walked a lot, so I brought an APS-C instead (Nikon D5300). Also the 5d mark ii is nice with vintage glass, the Helios 44 for instance.
Thanks Kalle, I have to try my Helios on it, i have just left that lens sitting around for years, I found it again recently I need to order and adapter for it so i can use it.
3:27 Yeah I get this point. However, I prefer choosing a camera for the user experience because I only shoot RAW and whatever camera I use, I always try to edit the photos to always look like they are MY PHOTO. Regardless of brand, my photos look the same, because it's not a "Fujifilm photo" or a "Canon photo" or a "Sony photo", it's MY photo.
I bought my 5D Mark ‼️ when it came out and the mirror fell out while I was on a shoot and when I tried to shoot a concert the pictures were completely dark, while looking perfect on my Nikon 😅 I sold it and later got the 5Diii which I sold to get the A7iii and I miss my Canon so much. changing to Sony took away My desire to shoot.
@@MartinCastein yes I think I will go back to Canon again, I came from Nikon and ended up with Sony but the only time I felt really at home was with Canon and Panasonic 🤗 all my network really build their businesses on the legendary 5D Mark ii.
my go to currently. i think the dynamic range and low light are leagues better than the 5DMKI, although i still prefer the subtle render of the classic.
Hi Martin, thanks for your informative and well considered videos. I have just bought a mark ii and I am very pleased with it. The only negative so far I have is that in Manual the iso is locked at 400. Unless there was a firmware update or a workaround I am not aware of, that seems a curious limitation. It was surely one of the main advantages of DSLRs that you had iso flexibility on each shot. Auto iso works so well on other cameras in Manual.
Having the era of the the 5d2 and with other units, there was more of learning to curb the light. I am into getting this unit as well with just a 50mm 1.8 or 1.4 stm. Presently using Nikon D800 and recently bought D300 with just 434 actuations. For a more demanding paid assignments, latest is better to meet the demands.
Iv been using 550 d since it came out only now in 2023 iv decided to add full frame and my choice is 5d mark 2 i think i finally deserve it and it costs only 300 euros 😀
I've actually never liked the 5d mk2 due to its button layout. Mk1 is MUCH better. But each to their own I guess. Canon 6d is about the same price these days and would be the best buy imo. It's pretty much a more modern, although not as sturdy Canon 5d classic.
Thats fair enough. the 5d classic is my favourite camera, I get on just fine with both though. the 6d is excellent too but its a different look from the 5d ii, I could easily make an arguement for owning all 3. Not really a logical one but certainly just for wanting them all.
The old 4/3 and m4/3 sensors have an optical density of 315 dpi. The newer 350 dpi while the Canon 5D only 72 dpi (Apple Mac 1984 standard 🤣 ). In practice, if you do not make large prints, it makes no sense to take pictures more than 5mpx because it is enough even for a 4K screen. Resolutions of the order of 8-20mpx are needed only for large photos and posters.
@@ESKATEUK Like I said, "each to their own".. I'm offering my opinion. The issue is I shoot in manual mode and can't change the iso as fluently on the 5d mark II as I can on the mark I (i.e. the back wheel). It's just a preference of a workflow that suits me. The button layout on 6d is like on the 5d mk1 in that regard.
I'm newbie to photography and apprecaite your vid... I'm pondering a Mk2 right now after playing around on and off with a T3i.... I mean sheet, they're out there for $200 buks yankee which is a deal. Plus I have basically been picking up vintage lenses as a further test of my patience and stability in hand (horrid shakes LOL!). Then I found monochrome and now I have a slew of stuff to play around with. Waiting on a Jupiter 8 and a Helios 44 2 w/ an anamorph adapter for kicks and giggles. right now playing with old Konica Hexanons and love them. But, full frame sensor goodness and the color.... makes me swoon. I may be becoming a Canon fanboy...omg. Someone shoot me. :) thank you again.
I recently got a used 5Dii and I'm enjoying getting to know how to use it. It's my first DSLR so Ive got a lot to learn, so thanks for the review and the tips. Although I'm new to cameras, I've been a musician for some time and there are gear guys and music guys. The gear guys love discussing the technical details and getting stroppy about minor points, while the music guys seem to be able to make music on any old guitar. Am I seeing a similar trend in camera gear? 👍🇦🇺
I currently have the Rebel T7, and Im looking at a minor upgrade, but Im poor. I can afford this camera body, and use some of the T7 lenses for this one. My questions are, is this worth the minor upgrade? More bang then the T7? Or is there another body that is reasonably priced, the same or a hair more, that would be advised for me to buy? I do landscapes, flowers and minor other stills. No one seems to want to pose for me, nor purchase any of my shots so Im not needing the video part, nor spend 5K for gear. I do love sunset and sunrise shots.
just use what you have if you are poor and if that changes later buy something but dont go buying gear now. People will pose for you, ask people in the street, set up an instagram account and get them to message you on there and send them photos after. if you ask 50 people some of them will say yes.
I bought a 5DmkII and a Canon 24-70 f/4 because of your videos :) I like that the 5D build like a tank - and the shooting experience is fantastic and fun. I can't decide if I should go for the RP og the R6mk1 as an upgrade. I really miss a better focus system on the 5D.
Only one camera? Why? 😂 I have something like 12 bodies. 5 film and 7 digital I think. And that is only the Canon stuff. One of them is the 5D Mark II. It was my first full frame digital camera. Much of the full frame experience for non pros started with the 5D2 I believe. It was expensive, but not as a pro body. And it had video, which was a first for Canon full frames. I love picking it up for a walk in the neighbourhood. When you are used to dragging around a 1D body, the 5D series feel small and light. The 6Ds feel almost to small to get a grip on….😁 As usual, nice video, and interesting to hear your opinions on what it is that makes these classics great.
@@MartinCastein Because I’m a hoarder. But I’m also interested in how these old cameras perform for people in different situations. In my opinion people tend to believe that they need things that they don’t. For portrait work, street, landscape and general photography all of the 5 and 6-series and most of the 1-series are more than good enough. I do prefer full frame, but honestly most of the XX-series and the 7’s are good enough, especially if you are one the persons that stop down two stops by default.😋
@@MartinCastein Thanks! It’s my third 1Ds Mk.II. I sold my last one this summer. It was a bit long in the tooth, and at 286 thousand actuations it was probably up for retirement. But I missed it, so when I found an ad for this one I couldn’t keep away. It is a former studio camera, used by a pro for a couple years and then stuffed away for years. It’s absolutely mint. Not even the black of the flash shoe has been worn away. I heartily recommend the three 1Ds cameras to people that are looking at the early 5D’s. The images of 1Ds and the 1Ds Mk.II has much of the same “feel” as the 5D, and the 1Ds Mk.III reminds me of the 5D Mk.II. They are bulky, and non of them has auto-ISO, something I do like about newer cameras. But they have a greatly superior autofocus than the 5D’s. And they can be found quite cheap, sometimes cheaper than the 5D’s, because of their “cult” status. It’s also worth to look at the 1D models. They have the smaller APS-H-sensors, but look phenomenal. Their main drawback compared to the 1Ds’s are slightly higher noise levels and their 1.3-crop, that makes it hard to find good wide angle alternatives. But they are fantastic for anything that moves or needs a bit extra reach. The burst rate is between 8.5 and 10 fps. My favourites are the 1D Mk.IIN and the 1D Mk.IV. I have yet to find the original 1D in good or at least decent condition. But that one is probably a bit low in resolution for even us older guys. 4.15Mp is enough for for anything that’s supposed to be posted online, but it is limiting. Summoning it up, most of the older 1D and 1Ds-series cameras are overlooked in my opinion. They fit the profile of most serious amateurs. They are built to last and they produce great images. And as it is now, they can be found as bargains, since the mirrorless trend makes them stand out as too bulky. Merry Christmas from a cold and grey Sweden!
2:50, it’s amazing but the 5D mkii just looks better. Incredibly how it keeps up with modern cameras of today when it comes to raw picture quality. And the colours are unmatched by anything recent.
@@MartinCastein yes I agree, the look of the recent cameras has become quite clinical to me. I much prefer the richer, earthier tones of the old cameras. I’ve just picked up a 5D classic for £130 in very good condition, I look forward to using it!
I completely agree Martin. I enjoy using the 5DM2 so much, and I also enjoy the EOSR. They’re so different in the way they operate that it takes a few minutes to adjust from one to the other if I try to mix them up. Having the R makes it really difficult to consider buying a 5DM3 or 4. I can’t see where those bodies would surpass the R. Especially when I consider how they don’t offer much over the 5DM2, either. I think I might look at getting a 1DX or 1DXM2 for the shots per second. I haven’t tried much action photography. There’s no way the 5DM2 can keep up with its 3fps! The R can do 7fps and it’s not terrible, at least when I tried it out on my dogs running around, LOL. Camera bodies are dropping in price so I might find myself with a 3rd one before long.
In the near future, the "r" ist the queen mum of the mirrorless. I have the "R" too, but i am often think to change to 5D4. . i miss the optical viewfinder. but its senseless... i had the 5D2 two times but i liked the 5D3 much more, only for the sd cards, the better viefinder (grid) and the first time with the Mfn Button. Last year i made vid about using it at night, but in german. 🤭
yeah as soon as you want action the 5d mark ii is NOT the camera for that lol yeah something like a 1dxii would be good or maybe prices on the r5/6 etc will drop soon. Might be worth looking at later.
@@nextpicture it’s funny you say the optical viewfinder is something you miss. I actually enjoy the digital VF on the R. In fact, there isn’t much I prefer in the 5D except the top screen, rear wheel, and the mirror itself. There is something special about the mirror clunking around in a DSLR. I kind of believe that if the RF lenses were cheaper or more plentiful on the used market, I’d likely switch over completely. I go back and forth in these beliefs so if you ask me next month, I might give a different answer! But I can say this, now that I have a much better working knowledge on the R, I’m very happy with it. It’s falls short in video but I don’t use a mirrorless or DSLR camera for making videos for my channel. I use a 4k Panasonic camcorder and have zero complaints. Camcorders are overlooked in my opinion. So my camera bodies take pictures and that’s it.
@@MartinCastein you’re right of course. After Canon starts releasing newer bodies and allowing 3rd party lenses, prices will come down. The original 1DX can be had for as low as $1,000 USD here. A 1DX2 is still a bit pricey, about $2,000 or so. I can find very good 5DM4 bodies for about $1200-1500 but the best deals are on the 5D3 and 6D. Each can be purchased for roughly $400. That’s an incredible deal I think. I officially retire in just over 2.5 years so I might wait and buy a special gift for myself at that time. Or maybe I’ll just plan a 6 month long trip through Europe! I never went to “discover” myself when I was 18, so maybe I’ll do it at 52!
@@FloridaTwoWheelAdventures ok..the optical viewfinder is everytime on and eats nearly no energy. in comparism to the "R" the viewfinder needs 0,9s to switch on. The "R6" an others 0,4s .. I configured my "R" like a DSLR. Manual switching from viewfinder to screen, no unnecessary infos in the viefinder an no review. The "R" has many advantages over DSLRs i dont think i go back. But! i have a lens problem. My EF24-70/4 IS is defintly better than the RF 24-105L . so i cant switch to RF completely..
how can you tell its a fake ? I Began watching your channel recently and purchased two canon 5d mark 2's . one has a matte gripping all over body the other has a shiner coat. and then it dawned on me, which one is a authentic which one is real? they look identical otherwise. also what to look for before buying ? any tips to check
Great video, thanks Martin. I've used mine for some time now and after using a friends Nikon z7, the dynamic range limitations are extremely noticeable. At 65yo, maybe time to upgrade for a camera that will do me another 10 years.
Thanks Alan, i have the z7ii as well and the dynamic range isnt on the same planet even, but the 5d ii has a great look of its own despite the limitations and i will be shooting both for that reason.
Hi, Martin. Sorry in advance for my english, because it's not my native language. But I have some questions. They are about 5d classic and 5d mark ii. 1) I've read in forums that they (5dc and 5d mk2) have same autofocus system. Is this true? I'm not talking about the layout, I wanna know speed differences and outer focus points accuracy. Can you share your experiences about this? (I'll pair camera with 50mm f1.8 ii or stm version) Actually all my worries are about autofocus and accuracy. Is there is differences, it that worth 100-150 dollar? 2) I had Nikon D5100 and 18-105mm kit. It was quite enough for me in autofocus speed (i know d5100 has no focus motor, lens did all the work). I never complained about autofocus and outer points accuracy. But when I pair my d5100 with Yongnuo 50mm f1.8, it was terrible. Most of the time I missed the focus, the outer focus points usually didn't work and I had to take shots with only center point. But 18-105mm was great. Have you ever tried d5100? I mean, what do you think, 5d classic (or mark 2) + 50mm would be worse or better than d5100 + 18-105mm? 3) Let me tell you about myself, then I will ask main question. I'm not the professional, I won't use my camera to make money(sometimes my friends invite me to photoshoot but it's not "work". I go for just my passion and to get experience). I usually do street and daily photography, sometimes portraits of my friends when we hangout in cafe or street. Sometimes I take photos of cars and every season I go to my granny's village where I shoot nature and landscape. Briefly, I need daily camera. I love film look but to be honest, even if I get film look straight out of camera, I'll edit my photos in Lightroom in any case. I have lots of film presets. What is your opinion? Which would better for me: 5D Classic or 5D mark 2? 5d mark 2 worth extra 150 $?
I think you should get the 5dii, the focus is exactly the same as the mark 1 but the mark ii is just an easier camera to live with for a variety of reasons, its much more refined. You will be fine with the 50mm stm on the mark ii, the focus isnt always great but it takes excellent pictures overall.
Thank you for the video. In fact, perhaps I can never review a camera! Why? Because, I never find faults with the cameras I use and love. Canon 5D Mark II is one of those. All its drawbacks are manageable and they make me a better photographer everyday. I sold out or returned the cameras I didn't like. Examples are 50D, 70D, 90D and 7DII. My darling bodies are 5D, 5DII, 5DIII, 1DIV and 7D. Own them all and use them everyday despite being purely a hobbyist. Because, I love shooting with them. Thanks again.
@@MartinCastein, thank you Martin. Just for the record, I have no yearning for MILCs. DSLRs replaced film SLRs due to being convenient in all departments. However, this time around the differences are minimal. In some areas DSLRs hold their ground. Real-time action capture is one of those. EVF lag of MILCs can never address this issue.
Nothing wrong with old DSLR'S, I still am using my D500...The only thing the mirrorless wonder cameras will do is track the eye and show the exposure through the EVF..That's all fine but to me half the fun is trying to hold a focus point on a BIF and shooting full manual and having to have skill to get my exposure right..
Great video! At the moment I have a "luxury" problem ;) I have a canon eos r8 and an eos r7 with some rf lenses BUT I also have 3 f4 EF lenses that I really love. In order to use them I have to fix the RF to EF adapter and then I can use them. The only disadvantage ist, that the lens + the adapter is pretty long starts getting heavy. So I am wondering if if would make any sense to buy a used 6d mark ii or a 5d mark iv to easily mount this ef lenses - cause in my understanding the picture quality is nearly the same (and I don't shoot videos at all). Would be great to receive some kind of feedback, thanks and cheers!
The 5D2 is still a great camera. These days there are no bad cameras just different cameras. I personally think if you want to try full frame then the 5D II is the best bang for the buck you can buy at the moment. I got mine around 2 years ago with battery grip and 17-40 F4 L for just over £400 which was and is still a bargain for what it gives and does.
Thanks for the video Mate - You have a new Subscriber! I have a Canon 5D MKIV body with Battery Grip & the holy trinity of L Glass…. I bought it in 2018, so was obviously out a few years, but the mirrorless gear wasnt present in Pro solutions at the time (or I would have probably got an R5)! But I have to say I lone the body & with the grip it is just such a quality unit to hold and is just a tank! Ive picked up an R5 a few times, but so far I just appreciate the feel of my 5DIV. now you have me looking at ebay for a 5DMKII….. I reckon that could be a cracking back up solution. Cheers
Hi Martin, im a recent subscriber and have watched many of your down to earth videos. I have really enjoyed them too. I used to own this very camera when I first got into photography, I really didn't make the most of it as not long afterwards I suffered a stroke and it took a while for me to recover from. Because of this I sold all my gear as I just couldnt cope mentally with the challenges of relearning how to use it as it was enough of a struggle learning 'life' again. If you know what I mean? However three years ago (about 6 years after my ground zero) I got into wildlife photography and a bit of landscape, mainly using a 7dmk2 and a couple of 1d bodies, which I really like. But I really miss the 5D2. So I have finally taken the plunge and ordered a low mileage body and cant wait for it to arrive! Thanks again for your excellent insight. Its much appreciated. N
I so pleased you are gettting back into photography, my partner had a stroke and she had to relearn everything too so I really can understand, I really wish you all the best and would like to say never give up and just keep at it and you will improve. Drop me a message any time you want.
The old 4/3 and m4/3 sensors have an optical density of 315 dpi. The newer 350 dpi while the Canon 5D only 72 dpi (Apple Mac 1984 standard 🤣 ). In practice, if you do not make large prints, it makes no sense to take pictures more than 5mpx because it is enough even for a 4K screen. Resolutions of the order of 8-20mpx are needed only for large photos and posters.
@@JC-oy9pq ah sorry, i assumed UK because you used the term mate hahah sorry, im not sure in the US isnt KEH a thing? i see that sometimes im not sure of US prices to advise you though, its probably best you look at a lot of them on the used market and work out average prices.
im kinda going the wrong way in natural progression when newer cameras are capable of both vid and photo, i now looking into having one camera for photo only and one for video only and on a lower budget i can pick up the 5dii for $200 bucks and spend $1000 for an sony a7 or something..maybe...i do need lenses too. damn, glass is so expensive.
It’s in the playback options in the menu there is in option to show focus point you need to turn that off it’s the blue part of the menu which is to do with playback and it’s called AF point display or something similar to that
I shoot on a 5D4 and 6D as my 2nd body camera - landscapes, family shots, sometimes wildlife and occasional events. Unfortunately, just few weeks ago, my 6D, which has served me brilliantly, developed a technical fault and had to send for repair. I am waiting for a quote for repair...... in meanwhile, I saw a 5D2 for £350 with very 9000 actuations from reputable camera retail shop. I bought it to try it out - while I wait for the outcome of the quote for the 6D repair. Plan: if beyond repair or more expensive to repair than the current value of the camera, I probably keep the 5D2 - so far, I've enjoyed using it, like the pictures and colour tones are nice & unique. It does have a different look to the images - reminds me of the colour tones of the printed images of the Guardian Newspaper (particularly the centre page photo) during the days when I use to buy the newspaper. It has been fun using it, having to work harder for my shots, which is rewarding as feel more in control of the kind of shot I want under manual mode. The low light capabilities not great compared to my 5D4 and does not focus well on my prime lenses, but with the Canon 24-70 f2.8 II, it has been great and produces sharp images. In the days when I had a 30D as my first camera, I remember wanting this camera at that time when it was newly released & was highly popular, but it was not within my budget as very expensive. It has been a pleasure to use and forced me to take out my old 512MB compact flash card, which also presents a nice challenge of getting shots right first time with the limited photos (unlike the 64GB memory cards you can get nowadays, and accumulate more junk shots). If 6D is repairable, it will present a dilemma (as I can return the 5D2 for refund as recently purchased) - the 6D is awesome camera with wonderful creamy like colour tones, great for low light capabilities, works well with my prime lenses if I get the focus right, and has not failed me (till it developed an electrical fault). I saw your review come up on the 5D2 and it was very insightful and thanks for sharing your experiences.
@@MartinCastein thanks Martin. Yes, you did mention in your video that you see people comment that can't have another camera when already got one...and you said ofcourse they can...have multiple cameras. Can I ask a few questions following your very insightful video: 1. What's the highest acceptable ISO on 5D2 before starting to see noticeable noise? 2. The 5D2 has 4 settings for noise reduction -which one do you recommend? 3. If having multiple cameras ( in my case, possibly 3 cameras: 5D4, 5D2, 6D if repairable) what tips do you have on deciding which camera to use? If easier to signpost me to another of your videos, pls feel free. Many thanks in advance. Best wishes for 2023.
@@wajidqureshi4105 Hi Wajid, ill just number the answers so you know which question i am answering. 1. i think it depends so much on what you call acceptable, for me id say for most people its around iso 3200 but im happy using it up to 6400, i simply dont care about noise i only care if detail is lost. 2. the noise reduction in camera only affects jpeg, turn it off, if you shoot jpeg id still turn it off because it smudges detail, remember noise isnt loss of detail unless noise reduction is applied. 3, youd choose based on 4 things, which look do you want which for me would mostly be between 5d ii and 6d, do you need autofocus performance then 5d iv, do you need 2 card slots then 5d iv do you need iso performance then 6d/5div.
@@MartinCastein thanks Martin. Incredibly useful. Much appreciated. I've subscribed to your channel & look forward to your videos. Best wishes for 2023.
Hi Martin, I was searching the web for news about the classic canon 5d II that a friend had told me about,and I think your reviews tell in the clearest way what it is all about when it comes to that kind of camera. I am not a photographer but a painter, and I am looking for a camera for photographing paintings in the studio on a tripod and with artificial lights. Do you think it is right to buy a camera like the canon 5d II or the others, maybe Nikon, that you talk about in your videos to photograph paintings? Greetings and congratulations on the videos.
I think you would be fine with the 5d mark ii for that you should really look at some videos on how to set that up properly if you arent used to photography, it shouldnt be too hard but your lighting will be critical.
Yes I recently purchased two Amaran p60x which I am trying, and still it is difficult to light paint. I will keep watching your videos, I am also intererssed in Nikons, from that period. I also need to get an idea about optics, a good quality 50mm, how about Zeiss optics Thank you , Regards.
@@MartinCastein Why tho? Iso is only one step better if so. If you compare it on thedigitalpicture 5d mar ii has way better details, the newer are cheating by having better noise reduction but way less details.
@@yamahaevojust for the focus system, if you are shooting a lot of weddings the focus will make life much easier, if it comes down to money then the 5d ii is still excellent.
@MartinCastein Yes but is it worth 3500 dollars just for the autofocus. Using just one focus point anyways 95% of all shots. Is the autofocus improved in the dark to or the same?
if for studio id actually get the 24-105 f4 and if for outdoors either the 35mm 1.4 or 85mm 1.2 depending on what focal length you like. You can also look at the 100mm f2 thats pretty good too and 135mm f2
Hi Martin, I've spent many days watching videos to help me pick what camera to buy. The conclusion is the5D mark ii. I'm new to this, no experience. What do I need in your opinion to start (which lenses)? Appreciate your help
Hi Jay, sorry late reply been travelling a long way, a couple of spare batteries, a new good quality sandisk CF card and a good card reader. for lenses i dont know what you shoot but if you just want to get "something" to get started get a 40mm 2.8 stm.
Totally agree with all your points. Bought an R6 as a hybrid upgrade, it died from heat stress, so ended up selling it back to the shop and went dedicated cinema camera.
Got the 5D II off the shelf, just shot a festival with it, gorgeous pics.
The 5D set a standard of excellence that is genuinely professional. Enough resolution for a Vogue magazine double page spread. Video suitable for cinema. It can do it. It feels like it can do it for a hundred years.
It was nice to hear you discuss the colour. I've had mIne so long I just thought all cameras did this.
100% agree. I've had a 5Dmkii for past 3 years and have achieved some breathtaking images. I've had the R5 for about 3 months and to be honest I always find myself going back to the 5D. It's like a an old comfortable pair of slippers. Still an excellent camera in 2022.
Thats interesting David, I think the simplicity of the older cameras is really nice, something is often lost with better technology
Agree too all of your statements I have 5d too and alsow a 20year old Ford Sedan and both are the ner and can compete with any modern day equipment
Purchased a "brand-new" 5D2 with just 5k shutter counts for $300 because of your video. Fantastic camera.
Yeah, the deals are awesome! I also got a 5Dmkii with 3500 shutter clicks for $399. It was a backup camera and looks brand new. I don't need anything better.
I ran a 5D2 as my main camera for 10 years, I'm now onto the 5D4 which I absolutely love but there's just something that feels 'right' whenever I pick my old mk2 up. Maybe it's just the familiarity and being 'at one' with it after all these years, but it just feels right. And, DR aside as you've mentioned, I still think it's an incredibly capable camera when it comes to the actual images it produces. I also know exactly what you mean when you talk about the shooting experience, I think it's amazing how far camera tech has evolved but I also can't help feeling it's taken some of the satisfaction out of nailing situations that are technically challenging. I'd also argue that if you've only ever used mirrorless cameras with the latest versions of DPAF you're probably not developing the skills that you really should be as a photographer.
Hi Paul, yes id probably agree with you there that learning on a dslr is more beneficial, i think mirrorless really brings the advantages as soon as you throw video into the mix but the 5d ii is really special.
The old 4/3 and m4/3 sensors have an optical density of 315 dpi. The newer 350 dpi while the Canon 5D only 72 dpi (Apple Mac 1984 standard 🤣 ).
In practice, if you do not make large prints, it makes no sense to take pictures more than 5mpx because it is enough even for a 4K screen.
Resolutions of the order of 8-20mpx are needed only for large photos and posters.
@@AriusNowak dpi has no relevance whatsoever to computer monitors or camera sensors, it's only a factor when we talk about printing.
The way you're approaching this is unfortunately rather flawed.
@@AriusNowak8mp is 4k monitor resolution. How large do those big tv look sharp? Yeah, you don't need that many pixels for the real world. But in practice higher resolution also doesn't matter. Noise doesn't go up at the same enlargement, it just has more fine detail hidden in that noise.
Definitely a thumbs up for having multiple cameras, I wish more photographers would do this instead of getting stuck in one system. I've spent thousands on all the new Fuji gear, I shoot film on load of old Pentax stuff which cost me peanuts. Then 3 months ago I bought a 5D Mark II because I saw one going for £150. I haven't been able to put it down since and absolutely love the look and colours coming out of it, especially with vintage manual focus lenses. Even shooting raw, I'm seeing things in Lightroom that I just don't get with my Fuji gear, and I do love the Fuji look but this old Canon camera just has some magic about it. Can't say I've noticed any real limitations as far as dynamic range goes, although to my eyes nothing compares to film, but between digital cameras I think it's largely a myth.
Thanks Pete, well im glad you are having a good experience with the 5d ii thats good to hear. Its one of those cameras where when you get home and look the pictures they look better than on the back of the camera and just makes you smile.
i prefere the 5d3 to be honest. its probably the best dslr canon ever made. in my opinion
I recently bought a 5D II again. I owned one in 2018 and regret that I sold it. The files are just beautiful. I have a 6D coming soon, very exciting comparing the two cameras.
I spent like 6 years trying to find a camera that felt as good as my old 6d and I finally did a few months ago. I bought a 6d. Lesson learned.
@@verycooltony the good thing is, I never tried mirrorless. I only know Canon DSLRs. I have a large collection of cameras and I really enjoy shooting them. I am very excited to get the 6D. My next goal is a 5D Classic.
@@luigicorleone1389 The classic has the best robustness and ergonomics out of the three in my opinion (and colours ofc). The 6d is your best compromise in my opinion if you want a slightly more modern camera over the 5d (classic). The 6d's dynamic range and iso performance is amazing. But the classic is my favourite.
Luigi, youll like both of them, they have a different look, the 6d is more modern but the 5dii has a different look to it which is in its own way really great too.
@@MartinCastein thanks Martin, I have no doubts that I will love the look of the 6D as well.
Really appreciate your humble experience-based outlook, insights, and you have a good eye. No BS. Thanks.
Just bought one with a 50mm 1.8 for $200. Couldn’t be happier. I’ve owned many cameras from the 1dx line to 5d3, Fuji/sony mirrorless etc etc and after 7 years, I forgot how much I love the older canon dslrs. Cant wait to play more with this one
Great review and truly stunning shots! I just bought a used Leica Q2 for $4K US and now I know what an idiot I was. I should have gotten one of these!
No no just stick with the Leica it will be great too
Started digital photography back in 2006 with a Sony alpha a200, then got a Canon t1i. Upgraded from the t1i to a 7d and hopefully this week getting my first full frame with a 5d mk2 😊
I still use mine regularly. It’s not my only camera but it’s my only full frame camera and I don’t feel the need for a new one. Centre focus spot and recompose works great. It’s fast enough for my needs.
I bought one today. Low shutter count. No signs of use for around $300. Judging from previous comments the price may have bottomed out. My son just bought a 1Dx mark II for about $1500 with 8000 shutter count in mint condition. He shoots concerts. It will be his second rig along with an EOS R. I'm anxious to see how it performs for him.
I used to have this one when I worked as a profesional portrait photographer. I love it!! It's not for sports and fast moving things, but with good lenses it's wonderfull!! And when it came out 15 years ago it was about 3000 USD. I just got one now for 180 USD!! Worth every penny! :)
The 5D Mk.2 looks like a good camera for most situations , and is very good value on the 2nd hand market . I got one for a friend , in what I suspect was unused condition ( seems a kit had been split up and the 24 - 105 zoom sold separately) . My friend loves this camera , and is taking excellent macro pictures with it combined with a 105 macro lens .
I’m a Sony shooter but I used my friends canon t2i and I quite liked the feel and sound of it.
Thanks so much for this Martin. I have the 5D, 5D mkII, and a 6D and I absolutely love them all. I learned photography in my teens shooting film and the 5D is especially comfortable for me because of it’s simplicity and the fantastic images that can be produced. I really appreciate that you point out that it isn’t necessary to have the latest and greatest kit. Truthfully, many of the bells and whistles that are found on the newest cameras are never actually put to use by their owners anyway.
Thanks Brian, thats the perfect Canon collection of bodies right there in my opinion!
The old 4/3 and m4/3 sensors have an optical density of 315 dpi. The newer 350 dpi while the Canon 5D only 72 dpi (Apple Mac 1984 standard 🤣 ).
In practice, if you do not make large prints, it makes no sense to take pictures more than 5mpx because it is enough even for a 4K screen.
Resolutions of the order of 8-20mpx are needed only for large photos and posters.
Hello! I too have a 5D mkii with a 105 mm lens. I want to get into wildlife side of photography but I’m in a dilemma. My 5D works well, but is still quite old with low burst fps. Higher fps is important for capturing wildlife. After seeing this, I thought of purchasing a new camera but my budget only allows me to get either a Sony a7ii (2014) with the 28-70mm kit lens OR a Sony a6100 with 55-210mm kit lens. I cannot afford anything else more than this. This new camera with kit lens would run me about the same as a sigma 150-600mm lens for my 5D. So which one would you suggest: should I keep my 5D and invest in a good telephoto lens or buy a new camera camera and try with the kit lens for now? Thanks
@@bladewarm1969 Glass is always more important than body. The sigma with a 5D is going to be much better than the aps-c witht he kit lens... And 210mm is gonna be too short most of the time.
If you really want another body made for wildlife along the 150-600, maybe have a look for a 7D or 7D mk2, they are no longer too expensive (look at mpb is you are in europe)
I'm here for it. I must have one. I've been shooting crop Canon cameras for years, had no idea how cheap these have become!
Great review!
If you can swing it, get a Mk III. Cost/quality ratio is very good.
CF/SD slots. Better low light. Much better controls.
Thanks!
We used it as a hammer one time when i couldn't find the actual hammer near me in NZ. Door was fixed and the camera worked right there and then. It has a magnezium body contruction and while i might not recommend popping nails in the wood you could def do it.
Fab camera!
🤣 i can imagine it working as a hammer too!
Thanks Martin. I started with film SLRs in the early 90s and that is why I love the modern DSLR's. In 2022 I bought a 5D Mk1 and a Mk3 and have gotten to love them. I prefer the simplicity of the Mk1 however. I have two lenses, a 24-105 and a 70-300, which have image stabilisation and these two lenses cover my needs and my kit produces pin sharp landscape and nature shots. As for the question are these cameras still relevant today the answer is : you bet they are. They are awesome tools and using them feels like real photography. Looking forward to more of your videos. Good luck.
Thanks Paul!
I really appreciate this video. I have almost just started as a pgotographer, learning everything, and bought a 5dii off FB marketplace. I desperately need to know how to use my camera and this is helping
Great video Martin! I love my 5D, and the mkii as well. It was my first full frame camera and it has literally taught me everything that I needed to know.
Thanks, both excellent cameras and different looks from the files.
Bruh hi I just want to buy camera mk ii is still to buy 2023
Excellent review, Martin, and great perspectives. We are always pulled to the latest and greatest but, as you pointed out, it bears a cost; in this case the simple pleasures of being far more engaged in the process of shooting a satisfying image.
Still a great camera. Preferred the 5DII image output over the RP. It's an oldie but a goldie. 😍
Thanks!
Dear Martin, I am a big fan of your channel and have been following it for while now. I am more of a Nikon DSLR shooter ("advanced" amateur). I own 5 Nikon cameras: D80, D200, D700, D610 AND D7100. I have been really learning a lot from you and I love your portraits as well as your landscape photos and I am vey impressed by the way you edit these (very obvious and clear improvement on the landscape ones). I have quite a number of old Nikon lenses, mostly AF-D series (primes and zooms) and some manual focus primes (135 f3.5, 200 f4 and 300 f4.5). I just watched a video of yours about the 5D MKII and, although I am very, very happy with my Nikon gear, I would be curious to try either a 5D MKI or MKII (the colors on the your portraits using these cameras impresses me a lot!), maybe with an inexpensive nifty fifty. Anyways, sorry for the extensive comment but mostly I would like to thank you for the amazingly useful and pleasant to watch videos. All the best and Happy New Year!!!
Thanks Martin - Love that you're re-acquainting us with these great cameras of 'old' ... hahaha. Picked up a like new 5D classic earlier this year as my truly fun camera. I just purchased a 7D with 4K clicks on it for a song. That will be my introduction to wildlife camera ( I am ambitious). I can see a 5DII, 6D, and 40D in my future. Oh my... I am sounding like a hoarder, but at these crazy low prices it is almost a crime not to scoop these up while the scooping is good. I think they'll experience a bit of a price increase in the coming years as people begin to realize that their fancy pants phones and mirror-less cameras ( I have and like these also) can be a bit too automated and lack a certain tactile fun factor about them.
Thanks Kevin, you are building a nice little camera collection there if you go with those bodies for sure!
The old 4/3 and m4/3 sensors have an optical density of 315 dpi. The newer 350 dpi while the Canon 5D only 72 dpi (Apple Mac 1984 standard 🤣 ).
In practice, if you do not make large prints, it makes no sense to take pictures more than 5mpx because it is enough even for a 4K screen.
Resolutions of the order of 8-20mpx are needed only for large photos and posters.
Just this morning I was taking inside my home some casual comparison shots (RAW) between my 5D classic, 6D, and RP, all with the 40mm pancake.
The 5D I believe produces the better-looking files to my eyes; the combination of crispness along with those soft fall-off transitions between lights and shadows created a very special “pop”, something like a “medium format effect” which goes beyond color adjustments🥹.
Talking about color, I can easily tune the 6D colors to match those of the 5D, however the RP’s files took me much longer to adjust, they completely different from the start.
Tomorrow I will make another between the 5D/6D with the 40mm vs the RP with the awesome RF 35mm IS, maybe that will be a different story.
This.
Hi Ricardo, yes I agree I think the 5d classic is the best too, i think the weak low pass filter and pixel density give that look, 12mp is a sweet spot on full frame it seems for having this pop.
The old 4/3 and m4/3 sensors have an optical density of 315 dpi. The newer 350 dpi while the Canon 5D only 72 dpi (Apple Mac 1984 standard 🤣 ).
In practice, if you do not make large prints, it makes no sense to take pictures more than 5mpx because it is enough even for a 4K screen.
Resolutions of the order of 8-20mpx are needed only for large photos and posters.
Went to mirrorless. I'm back on my Canon 5D mkii :-) I am one again with my camera..
haha yes, that can easily happen. they do feel more alive somehow.
I did most of my early landscapes with the Canon 5D mark 2. Great camera, wish I had it back.
ya you said it all ,,, & I really enjoy my mark 2 its a tank and fun to shoot i use a lot of m42's lens with it .. I like the old glass...i enjoyed your talking ...you have a good one ...gary
Thanks!
Great shot of the mountain at the start of the vid.
tank you for sharing your experiences.
I bought a used 5d Markii today and cant await trying this camera. Its my first fullframe cam.
I hope i can use my old manual film camera lenses (Fd und M42 mounts) successfully on it.
excellent video! I agree with you as I can't stand people claiming one can recreate any sensor/profile color from any camera based on any raw file since this is just not how it works in reality, you might come close with one image, but the next one fails entirely again
Exactly
I have R5 and R62 and can't get the colors of my 5D2. I needed a third camera for a shoot the other day and it felt like going back to the stone age, but it just looks better. There is nothing I can do to the R5, even with the same lens that makes it look as natural as the 5D2. I just can't risk using the 5D2 because I work so much faster with the R5 and I know I got focus. There are some important moments with important people and you don't get second chances sometimes. I've been able to capture some amazing moments with a 50mm 1.2 that would have had me guessing and nervous with the 5D2. It's a shame Canon can't replicate these colors anymore. I had an R3 for a couple weeks an it did seem a bit better.
This is a great post Luke, ive often spoken of the differences when it comes to focus and certain features. It all just depends on what you are doing and the significance of it. Can you take mulitple shots or is it just a moment and then its gone. So you have to decide based on that. Ive seen many say the same things. So I think its best to stick to having all these cameras and choosing which ones to use given what you are trying to do with them.
I took your advice and just bought one today. I will continue to use my Leica Q2 but this looks like a good addition. I have never bought a camera body for $400. Love it. Your vid led me here so thanks! Now I am trying to figure out what prims are best. I picked up a 50mm and an 85mm...we shall see.
Hi Martin. I would just to stay that I have been taking pictures for 38 years, and without trying to embarris you I must say that that you're imaiges are some the best I've ever seen. The Steve Mccurry of landscape. Merry Christmas to you.
Thank you so much Nigel that’s really kind of you!
I have always loved the cameras that are the "first" of something. I feel like there is more...prestige?? in those than the MK1800's. ;) I live perfectly fine with my 5D2, my 6D, 70D and the first version of the EOS-M (with a firmware upgrade). :) I used to be employed as a portrait photographer. And I was handed the 5D MK2 with a 24-105 F4 L. That lens is not great. I ended up using my Sigma 24-105 F4 Art instead. But for portraits, the 5D is wonderful. Rigth now it has a EF 85 F1,8 on it. It's a tool...a good one.
I have the 5dii and EOS3 and it feels like I'm just changing medium not workflow. A fantastic camera to take photographs. Not pictures. Always surprises me. Yes it's limited but I quite like that, makes me have to think twice
Since everyone is mentioning cameras that have nothing to do with your vid, I use a Nikon 300D and love it; However, I feel Canon produces a better pic with less effort.
Great video. Your explanations are informative and artful at once. It's good to get the creative experience along with the technical impression of a camera. I'm just about to hit purchase on one of these.
thank you! enjoy the camera!
Wow stunning photos,thanks for sharing.
Thank you for making this video. I just picked one up for my medium format Mamiyas. I am really happy with what I am getting in camera.
Glad it was helpful!
I had previously C5dclassic, 7dmk1, I have 5dm3 and bought recently just for fun C40d yes is only 10.2 megapixel but sound of shutter and feeling amazing. Also bought recently Nikon d700 just to try. All mirrorless camera which one I try don't have this vibe and artificial viewfinder push me off. Maybe in the future will try Fujifilm xt3 is still mirrorless but few film simulation so good to try.
Still have mine from when I bought it when it came out. Rented a Mark 3 when that came out it made no difference. Same with the Mark IV. I lost interest when the R series came out and Canon screwed me over again (first time when abandoning the FD lenses). My next camera will be a Leica. Meanwhile, the 5D II with a 50L and 135L does everything I want.
Enjoy watching your content and reviews of these old Canon cameras. Your photograph in this video is well framed too. In simple single point AF shooting these old dslr's are faster than mirrorless. My two cents.
Thank so much for you info, it has really helped my decision 😊
Nice review. I still use my 5D2... and love it. Sure... I wish it was 50mp with options to print large... but its a great body. Curious if you use Magic Lantern to open up the capabilities or not... and if you have done a video with ML and the 5D2? Bravo!
Very nice video, Martin, you're spot on, I think! I like the more natural outcome of the 5d mark ii, too much dynamic range often gives an artificial look. I like that it's sturdy when I want that, like today I travelled and walked a lot, so I brought an APS-C instead (Nikon D5300). Also the 5d mark ii is nice with vintage glass, the Helios 44 for instance.
Thanks Kalle, I have to try my Helios on it, i have just left that lens sitting around for years, I found it again recently I need to order and adapter for it so i can use it.
I bought one just for the live view while using my tilt shift lens. It was a pain on the classic. I agree on the earthy tones.
that makes sense, i cant imagine trying to use a tilt shift on the classic! you have my sympathy with that!
3:27 Yeah I get this point. However, I prefer choosing a camera for the user experience because I only shoot RAW and whatever camera I use, I always try to edit the photos to always look like they are MY PHOTO. Regardless of brand, my photos look the same, because it's not a "Fujifilm photo" or a "Canon photo" or a "Sony photo", it's MY photo.
I bought my 5D Mark ‼️ when it came out and the mirror fell out while I was on a shoot and when I tried to shoot a concert the pictures were completely dark, while looking perfect on my Nikon 😅 I sold it and later got the 5Diii which I sold to get the A7iii and I miss my Canon so much. changing to Sony took away My desire to shoot.
ah thats a shame that you didnt have a good experience with the 5d mark ii, well you could always get another mark iii though its a bit old now.
@@MartinCastein yes I think I will go back to Canon again, I came from Nikon and ended up with Sony but the only time I felt really at home was with Canon and Panasonic 🤗 all my network really build their businesses on the legendary 5D Mark ii.
my go to currently. i think the dynamic range and low light are leagues better than the 5DMKI, although i still prefer the subtle render of the classic.
Yes id agree with you there Nick!
Hi Martin, thanks for your informative and well considered videos. I have just bought a mark ii and I am very pleased with it. The only negative so far I have is that in Manual the iso is locked at 400. Unless there was a firmware update or a workaround I am not aware of, that seems a curious limitation. It was surely one of the main advantages of DSLRs that you had iso flexibility on each shot. Auto iso works so well on other cameras in Manual.
Hi, the iso isn’t locked you have auto iso on which locks at 400. Turn that off and iso will work as normal. 🙂
Having the era of the the 5d2 and with other units, there was more of learning to curb the light. I am into getting this unit as well with just a 50mm 1.8 or 1.4 stm. Presently using Nikon D800 and recently bought D300 with just 434 actuations. For a more demanding paid assignments, latest is better to meet the demands.
It has a nice realistic yet artistic and cartooney look like a nice painting or illustration
Thanks!
Bought one used last year. Only downside for me is its weight. It can produce outstanding images if you do your part.
Hi Ron, yes it is a little heavy but still a great camera for sure.
@@MartinCastein I got the 5D Classic earlier, also used. There's not much one can't do with these old Canons.
I would put that sunset on my wall - nice one!!!! Thanks
Thank you!!!!
Iv been using 550 d since it came out only now in 2023 iv decided to add full frame and my choice is 5d mark 2 i think i finally deserve it and it costs only 300 euros 😀
I've actually never liked the 5d mk2 due to its button layout. Mk1 is MUCH better. But each to their own I guess. Canon 6d is about the same price these days and would be the best buy imo. It's pretty much a more modern, although not as sturdy Canon 5d classic.
Thats fair enough. the 5d classic is my favourite camera, I get on just fine with both though. the 6d is excellent too but its a different look from the 5d ii, I could easily make an arguement for owning all 3. Not really a logical one but certainly just for wanting them all.
The old 4/3 and m4/3 sensors have an optical density of 315 dpi. The newer 350 dpi while the Canon 5D only 72 dpi (Apple Mac 1984 standard 🤣 ).
In practice, if you do not make large prints, it makes no sense to take pictures more than 5mpx because it is enough even for a 4K screen.
Resolutions of the order of 8-20mpx are needed only for large photos and posters.
Sounds a bit pedantic to me… the button layout is fine on either the 5D mkii or 6D and really not that hard to come to grips with
@@ESKATEUK Like I said, "each to their own".. I'm offering my opinion. The issue is I shoot in manual mode and can't change the iso as fluently on the 5d mark II as I can on the mark I (i.e. the back wheel). It's just a preference of a workflow that suits me. The button layout on 6d is like on the 5d mk1 in that regard.
I'm newbie to photography and apprecaite your vid... I'm pondering a Mk2 right now after playing around on and off with a T3i.... I mean sheet, they're out there for $200 buks yankee which is a deal. Plus I have basically been picking up vintage lenses as a further test of my patience and stability in hand (horrid shakes LOL!). Then I found monochrome and now I have a slew of stuff to play around with. Waiting on a Jupiter 8 and a Helios 44 2 w/ an anamorph adapter for kicks and giggles. right now playing with old Konica Hexanons and love them. But, full frame sensor goodness and the color.... makes me swoon. I may be becoming a Canon fanboy...omg. Someone shoot me. :) thank you again.
I recently got a used 5Dii and I'm enjoying getting to know how to use it. It's my first DSLR so Ive got a lot to learn, so thanks for the review and the tips. Although I'm new to cameras, I've been a musician for some time and there are gear guys and music guys. The gear guys love discussing the technical details and getting stroppy about minor points, while the music guys seem to be able to make music on any old guitar. Am I seeing a similar trend in camera gear? 👍🇦🇺
Hi Wesley, yeah that probably pretty accurate though not a rule!
I currently have the Rebel T7, and Im looking at a minor upgrade, but Im poor. I can afford this camera body, and use some of the T7 lenses for this one. My questions are, is this worth the minor upgrade? More bang then the T7? Or is there another body that is reasonably priced, the same or a hair more, that would be advised for me to buy? I do landscapes, flowers and minor other stills. No one seems to want to pose for me, nor purchase any of my shots so Im not needing the video part, nor spend 5K for gear. I do love sunset and sunrise shots.
just use what you have if you are poor and if that changes later buy something but dont go buying gear now. People will pose for you, ask people in the street, set up an instagram account and get them to message you on there and send them photos after. if you ask 50 people some of them will say yes.
I bought a 5DmkII and a Canon 24-70 f/4 because of your videos :) I like that the 5D build like a tank - and the shooting experience is fantastic and fun. I can't decide if I should go for the RP og the R6mk1 as an upgrade. I really miss a better focus system on the 5D.
R6 if you can afford it
@@MartinCastein Thank you! I love your videos. I learn a lot from them.
Only one camera? Why? 😂
I have something like 12 bodies. 5 film and 7 digital I think. And that is only the Canon stuff.
One of them is the 5D Mark II. It was my first full frame digital camera. Much of the full frame experience for non pros started with the 5D2 I believe. It was expensive, but not as a pro body. And it had video, which was a first for Canon full frames.
I love picking it up for a walk in the neighbourhood. When you are used to dragging around a 1D body, the 5D series feel small and light. The 6Ds feel almost to small to get a grip on….😁
As usual, nice video, and interesting to hear your opinions on what it is that makes these classics great.
hahahah how did i know youd have more than 10 cameras at least!
@@MartinCastein Because I’m a hoarder. But I’m also interested in how these old cameras perform for people in different situations.
In my opinion people tend to believe that they need things that they don’t. For portrait work, street, landscape and general photography all of the 5 and 6-series and most of the 1-series are more than good enough. I do prefer full frame, but honestly most of the XX-series and the 7’s are good enough, especially if you are one the persons that stop down two stops by default.😋
@@MartinCastein I bought a mint condition 1Ds Mark II today. It’s absolutely stunning. 16Mp of awesomeness!
Made me £225 poorer. Worth every penny!
@@mberggren9768 nice ! Congrats on your new camera!
@@MartinCastein Thanks! It’s my third 1Ds Mk.II. I sold my last one this summer. It was a bit long in the tooth, and at 286 thousand actuations it was probably up for retirement.
But I missed it, so when I found an ad for this one I couldn’t keep away. It is a former studio camera, used by a pro for a couple years and then stuffed away for years. It’s absolutely mint. Not even the black of the flash shoe has been worn away.
I heartily recommend the three 1Ds cameras to people that are looking at the early 5D’s. The images of 1Ds and the 1Ds Mk.II has much of the same “feel” as the 5D, and the 1Ds Mk.III reminds me of the 5D Mk.II. They are bulky, and non of them has auto-ISO, something I do like about newer cameras. But they have a greatly superior autofocus than the 5D’s. And they can be found quite cheap, sometimes cheaper than the 5D’s, because of their “cult” status.
It’s also worth to look at the 1D models. They have the smaller APS-H-sensors, but look phenomenal. Their main drawback compared to the 1Ds’s are slightly higher noise levels and their 1.3-crop, that makes it hard to find good wide angle alternatives. But they are fantastic for anything that moves or needs a bit extra reach. The burst rate is between 8.5 and 10 fps. My favourites are the 1D Mk.IIN and the 1D Mk.IV. I have yet to find the original 1D in good or at least decent condition. But that one is probably a bit low in resolution for even us older guys. 4.15Mp is enough for for anything that’s supposed to be posted online, but it is limiting. Summoning it up, most of the older 1D and 1Ds-series cameras are overlooked in my opinion. They fit the profile of most serious amateurs. They are built to last and they produce great images. And as it is now, they can be found as bargains, since the mirrorless trend makes them stand out as too bulky.
Merry Christmas from a cold and grey Sweden!
2:50, it’s amazing but the 5D mkii just looks better. Incredibly how it keeps up with modern cameras of today when it comes to raw picture quality. And the colours are unmatched by anything recent.
Yes i agree, i dont think canon has really managed to get back to these colours since the 6d really.
@@MartinCastein yes I agree, the look of the recent cameras has become quite clinical to me. I much prefer the richer, earthier tones of the old cameras. I’ve just picked up a 5D classic for £130 in very good condition, I look forward to using it!
I completely agree Martin. I enjoy using the 5DM2 so much, and I also enjoy the EOSR. They’re so different in the way they operate that it takes a few minutes to adjust from one to the other if I try to mix them up. Having the R makes it really difficult to consider buying a 5DM3 or 4. I can’t see where those bodies would surpass the R. Especially when I consider how they don’t offer much over the 5DM2, either. I think I might look at getting a 1DX or 1DXM2 for the shots per second. I haven’t tried much action photography. There’s no way the 5DM2 can keep up with its 3fps! The R can do 7fps and it’s not terrible, at least when I tried it out on my dogs running around, LOL. Camera bodies are dropping in price so I might find myself with a 3rd one before long.
In the near future, the "r" ist the queen mum of the mirrorless. I have the "R" too, but i am often think to change to 5D4. . i miss the optical viewfinder. but its senseless... i had the 5D2 two times but i liked the 5D3 much more, only for the sd cards, the better viefinder (grid) and the first time with the Mfn Button. Last year i made vid about using it at night, but in german. 🤭
yeah as soon as you want action the 5d mark ii is NOT the camera for that lol yeah something like a 1dxii would be good or maybe prices on the r5/6 etc will drop soon. Might be worth looking at later.
@@nextpicture it’s funny you say the optical viewfinder is something you miss. I actually enjoy the digital VF on the R. In fact, there isn’t much I prefer in the 5D except the top screen, rear wheel, and the mirror itself. There is something special about the mirror clunking around in a DSLR. I kind of believe that if the RF lenses were cheaper or more plentiful on the used market, I’d likely switch over completely. I go back and forth in these beliefs so if you ask me next month, I might give a different answer! But I can say this, now that I have a much better working knowledge on the R, I’m very happy with it. It’s falls short in video but I don’t use a mirrorless or DSLR camera for making videos for my channel. I use a 4k Panasonic camcorder and have zero complaints. Camcorders are overlooked in my opinion. So my camera bodies take pictures and that’s it.
@@MartinCastein you’re right of course. After Canon starts releasing newer bodies and allowing 3rd party lenses, prices will come down. The original 1DX can be had for as low as $1,000 USD here. A 1DX2 is still a bit pricey, about $2,000 or so. I can find very good 5DM4 bodies for about $1200-1500 but the best deals are on the 5D3 and 6D. Each can be purchased for roughly $400. That’s an incredible deal I think. I officially retire in just over 2.5 years so I might wait and buy a special gift for myself at that time. Or maybe I’ll just plan a 6 month long trip through Europe! I never went to “discover” myself when I was 18, so maybe I’ll do it at 52!
@@FloridaTwoWheelAdventures ok..the optical viewfinder is everytime on and eats nearly no energy. in comparism to the "R" the viewfinder needs 0,9s to switch on. The "R6" an others 0,4s .. I configured my "R" like a DSLR. Manual switching from viewfinder to screen, no unnecessary infos in the viefinder an no review. The "R" has many advantages over DSLRs i dont think i go back. But! i have a lens problem. My EF24-70/4 IS is defintly better than the RF 24-105L . so i cant switch to RF completely..
自分も修理完了期間を過ぎてから中古の5D2を入手しました。
なぜならばこの機種にはマジックランタンというソフトをCF経由で4K動画(6分ほどの制限あり)を撮影できるとTH-camで知っていたからです。
how can you tell its a fake ? I Began watching your channel recently and purchased two canon 5d mark 2's . one has a matte gripping all over body the other has a shiner coat. and then it dawned on me, which one is a authentic which one is real? they look identical otherwise. also what to look for before buying ? any tips to check
I love your content.
Thanks Ian!
Great video, thanks Martin. I've used mine for some time now and after using a friends Nikon z7, the dynamic range limitations are extremely noticeable. At 65yo, maybe time to upgrade for a camera that will do me another 10 years.
Thanks Alan, i have the z7ii as well and the dynamic range isnt on the same planet even, but the 5d ii has a great look of its own despite the limitations and i will be shooting both for that reason.
Hi, Martin. Sorry in advance for my english, because it's not my native language. But I have some questions. They are about 5d classic and 5d mark ii.
1) I've read in forums that they (5dc and 5d mk2) have same autofocus system. Is this true? I'm not talking about the layout, I wanna know speed differences and outer focus points accuracy. Can you share your experiences about this? (I'll pair camera with 50mm f1.8 ii or stm version) Actually all my worries are about autofocus and accuracy. Is there is differences, it that worth 100-150 dollar?
2) I had Nikon D5100 and 18-105mm kit. It was quite enough for me in autofocus speed (i know d5100 has no focus motor, lens did all the work). I never complained about autofocus and outer points accuracy. But when I pair my d5100 with Yongnuo 50mm f1.8, it was terrible. Most of the time I missed the focus, the outer focus points usually didn't work and I had to take shots with only center point. But 18-105mm was great. Have you ever tried d5100? I mean, what do you think, 5d classic (or mark 2) + 50mm would be worse or better than d5100 + 18-105mm?
3) Let me tell you about myself, then I will ask main question. I'm not the professional, I won't use my camera to make money(sometimes my friends invite me to photoshoot but it's not "work". I go for just my passion and to get experience). I usually do street and daily photography, sometimes portraits of my friends when we hangout in cafe or street. Sometimes I take photos of cars and every season I go to my granny's village where I shoot nature and landscape. Briefly, I need daily camera. I love film look but to be honest, even if I get film look straight out of camera, I'll edit my photos in Lightroom in any case. I have lots of film presets. What is your opinion? Which would better for me: 5D Classic or 5D mark 2? 5d mark 2 worth extra 150 $?
I think you should get the 5dii, the focus is exactly the same as the mark 1 but the mark ii is just an easier camera to live with for a variety of reasons, its much more refined. You will be fine with the 50mm stm on the mark ii, the focus isnt always great but it takes excellent pictures overall.
Thank you for the video.
In fact, perhaps I can never review a camera! Why? Because, I never find faults with the cameras I use and love. Canon 5D Mark II is one of those. All its drawbacks are manageable and they make me a better photographer everyday.
I sold out or returned the cameras I didn't like. Examples are 50D, 70D, 90D and 7DII.
My darling bodies are 5D, 5DII, 5DIII, 1DIV and 7D. Own them all and use them everyday despite being purely a hobbyist. Because, I love shooting with them.
Thanks again.
Thats a superb collection!
@@MartinCastein, thank you Martin.
Just for the record, I have no yearning for MILCs. DSLRs replaced film SLRs due to being convenient in all departments. However, this time around the differences are minimal. In some areas DSLRs hold their ground. Real-time action capture is one of those. EVF lag of MILCs can never address this issue.
Nothing wrong with old DSLR'S, I still am using my D500...The only thing the mirrorless wonder cameras will do is track the eye and show the exposure through the EVF..That's all fine but to me half the fun is trying to hold a focus point on a BIF and shooting full manual and having to have skill to get my exposure right..
Yeah i agree, i think mirrorless comes into its own if you do video though for sure, other than that, id really like a d850....
@@MartinCastein 👍
Great video! At the moment I have a "luxury" problem ;) I have a canon eos r8 and an eos r7 with some rf lenses BUT I also have 3 f4 EF lenses that I really love. In order to use them I have to fix the RF to EF adapter and then I can use them. The only disadvantage ist, that the lens + the adapter is pretty long starts getting heavy. So I am wondering if if would make any sense to buy a used 6d mark ii or a 5d mark iv to easily mount this ef lenses - cause in my understanding the picture quality is nearly the same (and I don't shoot videos at all). Would be great to receive some kind of feedback, thanks and cheers!
Thanks
Thank you!!
The 5D2 is still a great camera. These days there are no bad cameras just different cameras. I personally think if you want to try full frame then the 5D II is the best bang for the buck you can buy at the moment. I got mine around 2 years ago with battery grip and 17-40 F4 L for just over £400 which was and is still a bargain for what it gives and does.
Thanks for the video Mate - You have a new Subscriber!
I have a Canon 5D MKIV body with Battery Grip & the holy trinity of L Glass…. I bought it in 2018, so was obviously out a few years, but the mirrorless gear wasnt present in Pro solutions at the time (or I would have probably got an R5)! But I have to say I lone the body & with the grip it is just such a quality unit to hold and is just a tank! Ive picked up an R5 a few times, but so far I just appreciate the feel of my 5DIV.
now you have me looking at ebay for a 5DMKII….. I reckon that could be a cracking back up solution. Cheers
hahaha welcome aboard Scott!
Hi Martin, im a recent subscriber and have watched many of your down to earth videos. I have really enjoyed them too. I used to own this very camera when I first got into photography, I really didn't make the most of it as not long afterwards I suffered a stroke and it took a while for me to recover from. Because of this I sold all my gear as I just couldnt cope mentally with the challenges of relearning how to use it as it was enough of a struggle learning 'life' again. If you know what I mean? However three years ago (about 6 years after my ground zero) I got into wildlife photography and a bit of landscape, mainly using a 7dmk2 and a couple of 1d bodies, which I really like. But I really miss the 5D2. So I have finally taken the plunge and ordered a low mileage body and cant wait for it to arrive! Thanks again for your excellent insight. Its much appreciated. N
I so pleased you are gettting back into photography, my partner had a stroke and she had to relearn everything too so I really can understand, I really wish you all the best and would like to say never give up and just keep at it and you will improve. Drop me a message any time you want.
@@MartinCastein thank you Martin, appreciated. I hope your partner made a good recovery
@@nickwithers4964 she did thank you, not 100% though.
I currently have the Canon EOS 2000D. What would you recommend for nature / wildlife photography? The 2000D or the 5D
The old 4/3 and m4/3 sensors have an optical density of 315 dpi. The newer 350 dpi while the Canon 5D only 72 dpi (Apple Mac 1984 standard 🤣 ).
In practice, if you do not make large prints, it makes no sense to take pictures more than 5mpx because it is enough even for a 4K screen.
Resolutions of the order of 8-20mpx are needed only for large photos and posters.
quite right! thank you for your comment !
Awesome info! Thanks mate! I'm sold.
What's a good price range I should shoot for a good/excellent condition body only? Subscribed!
I’d buy from MPB because you get a warranty on there and you can see the prices. 🙂
@@MartinCastein thanks Martin - sorry how about in the U.S. (apologies I didn't clarify the county) 😃
@@JC-oy9pq ah sorry, i assumed UK because you used the term mate hahah sorry, im not sure in the US isnt KEH a thing? i see that sometimes im not sure of US prices to advise you though, its probably best you look at a lot of them on the used market and work out average prices.
5D mark II likes sigma art lenses?? or tamron lenses ?? for landscapes
If I have a 5D Mark II and want to buy another camera, which would you prefer: the 5D Mark 4 or the 6D Mark II?
What lens do you like most to use with this camera?
for me the Canon EF 40mm F/2.8 STM Pancake Lens,
im kinda going the wrong way in natural progression when newer cameras are capable of both vid and photo, i now looking into having one camera for photo only and one for video only and on a lower budget i can pick up the 5dii for $200 bucks and spend $1000 for an sony a7 or something..maybe...i do need lenses too. damn, glass is so expensive.
If you had to choose between the Classic and the 5D II for upper body portraits, which one?
Get the mark ii as it’s easier to work with.
Q: Martin, which landscape lens would you recommend to pair with the MkII ?
Hi, 17-40 f4 / 16-35f4is / 24-105 / 70-200f4IS
Hi again! I just received one of these when I take a picture and I go back to look at it there is a red square 🟥 how do I remove that. ?
It’s in the playback options in the menu there is in option to show focus point you need to turn that off it’s the blue part of the menu which is to do with playback and it’s called AF point display or something similar to that
From your experience, what are some good lenses for this and what are the ones to avoid ? Thanks !
what do you shoot?
products, portraits and landscapes
I shoot on a 5D4 and 6D as my 2nd body camera - landscapes, family shots, sometimes wildlife and occasional events. Unfortunately, just few weeks ago, my 6D, which has served me brilliantly, developed a technical fault and had to send for repair. I am waiting for a quote for repair...... in meanwhile, I saw a 5D2 for £350 with very 9000 actuations from reputable camera retail shop. I bought it to try it out - while I wait for the outcome of the quote for the 6D repair. Plan: if beyond repair or more expensive to repair than the current value of the camera, I probably keep the 5D2 - so far, I've enjoyed using it, like the pictures and colour tones are nice & unique. It does have a different look to the images - reminds me of the colour tones of the printed images of the Guardian Newspaper (particularly the centre page photo) during the days when I use to buy the newspaper. It has been fun using it, having to work harder for my shots, which is rewarding as feel more in control of the kind of shot I want under manual mode. The low light capabilities not great compared to my 5D4 and does not focus well on my prime lenses, but with the Canon 24-70 f2.8 II, it has been great and produces sharp images. In the days when I had a 30D as my first camera, I remember wanting this camera at that time when it was newly released & was highly popular, but it was not within my budget as very expensive. It has been a pleasure to use and forced me to take out my old 512MB compact flash card, which also presents a nice challenge of getting shots right first time with the limited photos (unlike the 64GB memory cards you can get nowadays, and accumulate more junk shots). If 6D is repairable, it will present a dilemma (as I can return the 5D2 for refund as recently purchased) - the 6D is awesome camera with wonderful creamy like colour tones, great for low light capabilities, works well with my prime lenses if I get the focus right, and has not failed me (till it developed an electrical fault). I saw your review come up on the 5D2 and it was very insightful and thanks for sharing your experiences.
Thank you for sharing this Wajid, No harm in having the 6d and 5d ii at the same time, keep them all once your camera gets repaired.
@@MartinCastein thanks Martin. Yes, you did mention in your video that you see people comment that can't have another camera when already got one...and you said ofcourse they can...have multiple cameras. Can I ask a few questions following your very insightful video: 1. What's the highest acceptable ISO on 5D2 before starting to see noticeable noise? 2. The 5D2 has 4 settings for noise reduction -which one do you recommend? 3. If having multiple cameras ( in my case, possibly 3 cameras: 5D4, 5D2, 6D if repairable) what tips do you have on deciding which camera to use? If easier to signpost me to another of your videos, pls feel free. Many thanks in advance. Best wishes for 2023.
@@wajidqureshi4105 Hi Wajid, ill just number the answers so you know which question i am answering. 1. i think it depends so much on what you call acceptable, for me id say for most people its around iso 3200 but im happy using it up to 6400, i simply dont care about noise i only care if detail is lost. 2. the noise reduction in camera only affects jpeg, turn it off, if you shoot jpeg id still turn it off because it smudges detail, remember noise isnt loss of detail unless noise reduction is applied. 3, youd choose based on 4 things, which look do you want which for me would mostly be between 5d ii and 6d, do you need autofocus performance then 5d iv, do you need 2 card slots then 5d iv do you need iso performance then 6d/5div.
@@MartinCastein thanks Martin. Incredibly useful. Much appreciated. I've subscribed to your channel & look forward to your videos. Best wishes for 2023.
you can't compare 6D to 5d Mark II. MII trumps in everyway !
Thanks!
Thank you!!! 🙏
Can you tell me what lens the camera has in this video?
Hi Martin, I was searching the web for news about the classic canon 5d II that a friend had told me about,and I think your reviews tell in the clearest way what it is all about when it comes to that kind of camera. I am not a photographer but a painter, and I am looking for a camera for photographing paintings in the studio on a tripod and with artificial lights. Do you think it is right to buy a camera like the canon 5d II or the others, maybe Nikon, that you talk about in your videos to photograph paintings?
Greetings and congratulations on the videos.
I think you would be fine with the 5d mark ii for that you should really look at some videos on how to set that up properly if you arent used to photography, it shouldnt be too hard but your lighting will be critical.
Yes I recently purchased two Amaran p60x which I am trying, and still it is difficult to light paint. I will keep watching your videos, I am also intererssed in Nikons, from that period.
I also need to get an idea about optics, a good quality 50mm, how about Zeiss optics
Thank you , Regards.
Thinking on going for 2 5dm2 instead of 1 5dm2 and 1 r5 for weddings. Noise, autofocus and dynamic range sadly lacks behind tho.
For weddings I’d get the r5, mirrorless is the way to go for weddings
@@MartinCastein Why tho? Iso is only one step better if so. If you compare it on thedigitalpicture 5d mar ii has way better details, the newer are cheating by having better noise reduction but way less details.
@@yamahaevojust for the focus system, if you are shooting a lot of weddings the focus will make life much easier, if it comes down to money then the 5d ii is still excellent.
@MartinCastein Yes but is it worth 3500 dollars just for the autofocus. Using just one focus point anyways 95% of all shots. Is the autofocus improved in the dark to or the same?
What AF lens (I am really asking about auto focus) works best with Canon 5d mark Ii?
what for?
@@MartinCastein mainly for portrait photography (on mark Ii body)
if for studio id actually get the 24-105 f4 and if for outdoors either the 35mm 1.4 or 85mm 1.2 depending on what focal length you like. You can also look at the 100mm f2 thats pretty good too and 135mm f2
So - that’s why I want one!
Was the 5d2/RP tone comparison a sooc jpeg?
Hi John, these were RAW sooc.
I have a canon 7d camera would the canon 5d mk2 be any good for wildlife photography
Probably not I’d say
Hi Martin, I've spent many days watching videos to help me pick what camera to buy. The conclusion is the5D mark ii. I'm new to this, no experience. What do I need in your opinion to start (which lenses)? Appreciate your help
Hi Jay, sorry late reply been travelling a long way, a couple of spare batteries, a new good quality sandisk CF card and a good card reader. for lenses i dont know what you shoot but if you just want to get "something" to get started get a 40mm 2.8 stm.
@@MartinCastein thanks Martin. I wanna portraits.
@@jaycole1900 you can actually do a pretty good job with the 40mm especially outdoors add the 85mm 1.8 as well