ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
Gigawatt green hydrogen plant: the advanced design
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ม.ค. 2022
- We are one important step further towards a Dutch hydrogen economy. ISPT proudly presents the design for an innovative and advanced green #hydrogen plant at gigawatt scale, which can be operational in 2030.
The advanced design is a result of the new report 'Gigawatt green hydrogen plant: Advanced design and total installed capital costs’, which is now available for download.
On this page you will find the report available to download » ispt.eu/gigawa...
For more detail on the Hydrohub gigawatt scale electrolyser project, see » ispt.eu/projec...
#hydrogen #hydrogenplant #industry #ciculareconomy #climateagreement #energytransition #sustainableindustry #greenindustry #processtechnology #processindustry #ISPT
Good approach. Look forward to seeing a physical plant built.
Very good work
This model should be adopted by the UK. Instead of blue hydrogen.
Also see hysata new technology. Making efficiency of electrolysis to 98%
Very cool!!!
Very informative and useful video, thank you! What would be the impact on marine life of using desalinated salt water for the electrolysis?
Awesome~~^^🎉🎉
Very useful. Appreciated!
Murat was here. TFS (Thanks For Sharing)
🤩😍😍😍😍
In South Africa we have electricity shortage. Should i find investors, i would build this green hydrogen plant.
What would be the construction and setup ready for operation cost of such a plant? I am interested in two scenarios; one where the electricity is stored as you explained in the video and one where it comes directly from wind and solar power. Thank you.
What's LCOH (Levelized Cost of Hydrogen)? How much maintenance will this plant require? would make more sense to have the electrolyzers work off directly from wind or solar energy and avoid the need for the electrical equipment (keep a DC-DC converter at most) many electrolyzers can deal with intermittent electricity. Solar is now cheaper and expected to reach $0/kWh in the US (see PV magazine). The plant will be co-located with a solar array or windmill farm and activated when power can't be exported.
Hello, thank you for your interest and questions. The Levelized Cost of hydrogen is the price the end user pays for hydrogen. If the hydrogen production factory is located further away from an end user, this will for example also include transport costs. Regarding your point of using direct current from solar of wind parks; indeed this is a very interesting remark! We are now starting up a new project to explore this possibility. It will indeed make the hydrogen production more efficient. For more information see our report 'A One-GigaWatt Green-Hydrogen Plant; Advanced Design and Total Installed-Capital Costs: ispt.eu/media/Public-report-gigawatt-advanced-green-electrolyser-design.pdf. Kind regards, ISPT
Can we transport these compressed hydrogen gas to remote areas and used in generating electricity in commercial Shop off grid
Thank you for your question. Technically yes, but if this is sensible and economic is a different question. To answer your question requires more understanding of the use case, conditions and scale. Probably best to generate renewable electricity off grid without conversion and transport losses.
apex cot of 830Euro/ Kw includes Power Supply& Electronics cost 31%. Is includes cost of wind mill ?
Of course not. Offshore wind turbines cost several thousand euros per kW.
What amount of water is used annually and what are the environmental and ecological impacts of the plant?
Hi Roy, to answer your question. There is no environmental and ecological impacts of the plant.
Only thermal discharge, fresh water usage and oxygen emission.
The electrolyser plant uses process water and cooling water. Process water is feed water for water electrolysis and is (stoichiometric) 0,9 litres per kg of hydrogen produced, which is roughly 100 m3/h for a GW hydrogen plant.
• Specific demin water consumption is 9 L/kg (0,8 L/Nm3) produced hydrogen.
• Water consumption is depending on load variation 0-100%
• Water losses with O2 vent: 5% losses (PEM)
• Required capacity net demin water consumption:
• nominal 171 m3/h (alkaline)
• nominal 167 m3/h (PEM)
• design margin 30% (including losses and buffering)
• design: 230 m3/h
• Reverse osmosis (recovery of 50%) and Ion exchange (PEM)
• Therefore 460 m3/h of fresh water
Cooling water demand depend on system and heat recovery. We use open CW system. Roughly 75% of a GW electricity supply to a plant is converted into heat, so about 250MW.
@@ISPTNetherlands Hi! Thanks for the elaborate answer, super interesting. Have you looked into the effect of fresh water extraction on water ecosystems? Or would all water be obtained from the sea and then be processed via reverse osmosis? If so, to what extent would that affect aquatic life? Thanks in advance.
Can you compare between pem and aem ?
Where are you located Thnq
How do I buy one please ?
43 Kwh will produce 1 kilo f Hydrogen?
kWh is $0.01 so 1 kilo of H2 is only $0.43 or less ( see PV magazine: Prospects for US solar electricity at $0/kWh).
😛
Can't understand why you want to make a big power plant. When if you just made small ones for small communities and spread it out amongst the people you could start building them today.
Hello Ray, thank you for your interest. The focus of our study is on industry and not residential areas. Besides, with a big plant you can easier reduce capital costs. We did look into smaller electrolyser units, but as expected this will only increase the capital costs per MW produced. Kind regards, ISPT
Another important and responsible viewpoint on this subject is here:
th-cam.com/video/Zklo4Z1SqkE/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=SabineHossenfelder
Feedstock, yes. Energy carrier? No.
thats CRAZY EXPENSIVE 800 euro per kilowatt?! thats CRAZY. people will be spending literally tens of thousands per month for electricity. this is terrible. china is seriously going to take over the world because the west is being so stupid with things like this. while china keeps building coal plants. they produce power as cheap as possible they dont care about co2. and when we wind up failing economically and we are unable to defend ourselves because we dont have the money or energy to do so. its really a shame. instead of forcing this bs, we should be forcing heavy polluters to stop. put sanctions on any country that uses coal power plants. give incentives to those who use green energy. and stop forcing this green energy stuff.
This is not for the price for civilians. You really thing they would expect people to pay for that? Mate use your head.
You seem all confused with yourself. 800 euro is not the price to the individual consumer. it is the capital cost to set up the plant if I am not mistaken. Then u seem to be encouraging China to continue using coal coz its cheap and then you go on to say heavy polluters must be punished. What do you think coal is doing? Then u go on to say give incentives to those who use green energy and at the same time you calling the west stupid for going green. what are you saying exactly?
We need A synthetic fuel so we don’t have to change our infrastructure or buy electric cars because EVs are crap!