VW TSI ENGINE ANIMATION

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 163

  • @skochevtsev
    @skochevtsev 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I own vw gold mk 6 1.4 TSI 118 KW 2010 with less than 100k on the clock and I have low compression in the cylinder 4 and misfiring. I just rang VW Australia and they said the car is out of the warranty, so you are on your own. Great service and reliability VW!

    • @davidgruen7423
      @davidgruen7423 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sergey Kochevtsev lol, ah oh. I got 200k on the clock on mk5 Golf GTI 147kW, got a broken camshaft chain that spent me 4000 (extented warranty paid the bill, I spent 2000 on the warranty), runs fine now.

  • @mikefranzgrote1642
    @mikefranzgrote1642 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I have owned a 1.8 tsi Jetta for five months, purchased new.
    - exceptional performance, in particular the torque delivery, behaves like a midsize V-8
    - exceptional fuel economy, I drive 120 kms/day, round trip. Average fuel economy typically mid-5-liter/100 kilometres
    - extremely happy with the all-around package of performance/handling/build quality
    On the down side, car is in getting a clutch problem diagnosed under warranty. Intermittent chattering, not related to driver error. Also, having previous experience with turbos, purchased extended warranty (to 200,000) in case turbo technology isn't sustainable over the long term.

  • @julosx
    @julosx 14 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    @Corni33 FSI = natural aspiration and direct injection, TFSI : the same with single turbo, TSI : twin charged

  • @humfmaestro
    @humfmaestro 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    @Robert Urban! Are you being genuinely serious!!? The old 1.9 tdi has arguably been one of the most bomb proof engines! my dad had a mkiii which did 220k miles no problems! ive got a mkv on 140k and engine is still solid as a rock! plus which tsi and which tdi are you commenting on?? the 1.6 tdi or the 3l v6? or perhaps the 1.2 R4 tsi or the 3.0 v6 tfsi!!?

  • @peterhadjisavas981
    @peterhadjisavas981 10 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great engines- had mine for over 180,000kms.. no problems apart from standard servicing requirements. Prefect combination of power and low fuel consumption.

    • @kott707
      @kott707 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Peter Hadjisavas Could you tell me, How often did you change the oil? every 15000km or 10000km?

    • @JurijLasic
      @JurijLasic 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Arthur Milstead There's no such thing as oil change actually for these :D you got to refill it so often, that you change it 3 times between the ACTUAL oil changes. Based on 2009 A3 1.8T TFSI experience. You won't do a 1000km before the low oil level popup appears...

    • @billhadjisavas4636
      @billhadjisavas4636 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +JurijLasic Hahaha! minimal oil loss from my engine. Oil chaged every 5,000 klm. 1.8TFSI is a very different engine to the 118TSI. Don't know what oil your refilling with????

    • @billhadjisavas4636
      @billhadjisavas4636 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Arthur Milstead 5000klm.

    • @JurijLasic
      @JurijLasic 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Peter Hadjisavas You're right, the video is about TSI not TFSI, my bad. Answering your question: Valvo 5W30 was the oil it drank like mad, now after switching to Castrol 10W60 it's better, but still far from perfect

  • @hobizoli
    @hobizoli 15 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The first car with this setup was the famous Lancia Delta S4 more then 20 years ago, the street version was also a twincharger

  • @crudeoilsystems
    @crudeoilsystems 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice to know this is a family car with a bit more oomph!

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    there is a chain to control the the second camshaft, the one for the outlet ports.
    on the front side there is a belt, but it only drives the inlet shaft.
    the 2.5,... tdi has 2 of these chaints.
    125ps for a 1800 is good number, else it would endanger other models.
    i think for the aluminium head, it's a real good number.
    the 125ps version has some of the parts required for the turbo version, already build in.
    there is a tube under the radiator for the intercooler

  • @sweetbounty
    @sweetbounty 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    which ones? are they "new" or only reconstruct ?

  • @Braveheart1984
    @Braveheart1984 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm really happy with the 1.4 TSI in my Skoda Octavia. It's a dream to drive, coupled to the 7 speed DSG. Gives good mpg too on a motorway journey.

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    oh, and audi a4, a6, a8, passat and exeo's frontwheel suspention is amazings cool, just to look at, a 4 link system, witch allows variable wheel angles when the wheel turn.
    i can't express my self en how the escribe the effect.
    but it's a race car type suspention.
    it has spare holes, to adjust the wheel angle, even the link bar from the steering looks cool and technical.
    i have repaired an accidental vihicle and was required to change the part with the wheel bearing and a new wheel.
    amazing!

  • @mikethebeast1012
    @mikethebeast1012 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    VW are geniuses and this is just more proof of that

  • @eddyman101
    @eddyman101 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    1.8t vs. 2.0t who wins overall? (for example modifications, durability, power gains etc..)

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    all cars should be build like that.
    you can even add 4 wheel drive if you find a donor car on the scrap yard.
    you need the gearbox, the rear axle system(subframe with differantial and suspention).
    voila, a beast that takes tight curves on town road like it's cheese, i have done 200+km/h+ (friend's '98 audi a8) on a land road with the 2 right wheel in the mud, that smal the road was for 2 car to pas.
    it's superbly safe personal race car for daily use.
    i wish all cars where like these ...

  • @miguelrivera1282
    @miguelrivera1282 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    IS A EXCELENT TECHNOLOGI VERY GOOD

  • @El_Jefe_S3
    @El_Jefe_S3 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    i run this very motor in my Audi A3 and i can vow that this engine is reliable. I have done modifications such as after market intake, downpipe, hybrid turbo and stage 2 software. my vehicle has jumped from 90kw and 200nm up to 145kw and 320nm and the car runs perfect as a daily driven vehicle.

  • @kusinagi
    @kusinagi 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yay, great video! I'm gonna buy this car as my first car to save money on fuel... I'm still wondering about the overhead capacity of the car if it can take a shortage of water for a long time...

  • @AANate007
    @AANate007 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @MyChemicalJasper483 well we did, look at the ford focus ecoboost. I'm not quite sure it gets 170 but its close

  • @Falewick
    @Falewick 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good engine with high power and, suprisingly, a lot of headroom. With moderate chiptuning you can raise the maximum torque from 200 to 260Nm all over the rpm spectrum and the maximum power output to 110kW.

  • @sweetbounty
    @sweetbounty 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    ok nevermind coz I know this all what u writing of
    Did u have an exeprience with S60 T5 engines ? 250 PS ?

  • @drmkkk
    @drmkkk 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Actually Ferrari are putting out around 120BHP / liter from atmospheric engines, but the TFSI is very good also (direct injection etc).

  • @powersliding
    @powersliding 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    and they havent even introduced a variable cam duration and lift system yet into this brilliant set up

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    why is 5 valve unsuccesfull, i once removed the cam shafts to exchange the chain on them, a 20v 1800 engine - a4.
    i was amazed about the cams angel on the 3 inlet valves(they vary), smaller and therefor closer build, it's not that complex, it has a total accetable build quality.
    hydraulic valve adjust.
    the more valve, the more air effortly get's in, better vaporization of the fuel.
    yahama uses it on his bikes, do you think they also wrong¿?

  • @mikethebeast1012
    @mikethebeast1012 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    VGT are new and expensive thats all, this is the best setup for the cost

  • @Corni33
    @Corni33 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    @nekdonoben fsi has no turbocharger, tsi and tfsi are the same, only other names (turbocharged fuel stratified injection)

  • @jubaiyagyu
    @jubaiyagyu 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    I drive a 2010 VW Jetta Wolfsburg 2.0 Turbo TSI, and I have to say, to me, it sometimes feels like a V8; and it sips fuel. A full tank of premium can last a good two weekes going 14 mls back & forth to work for me.

  • @tajgrstajl
    @tajgrstajl 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    TSI engine was founded in Czech Republic by Škoda Auto engineers.

  • @trustfire
    @trustfire 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    awesome system, wonder what it sounds like with no exhaust.

  • @oilhammer04
    @oilhammer04 15 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It depends on the initial cost of the vehicle. It takes a long time to recoup the extra initial cost in fuel savings. You may wear the car out long before the fuel savings matches the extra cost of the car. If you are looking at just economics you have to look at the total cost to own the vehicle. I think Yahoo gives this cost for vehicles. Civic is probably at the top for cheapest cars to own.

  • @clifford850r
    @clifford850r 16 ปีที่แล้ว

    Once the engine is done, it doesn't matter because they were the first to the market with it. Once the car is released, any automaker could just buy the car and take it appart to see how it works anyway.

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    i know, that smal civic vtec from the crx did that.
    but that was an exeption.
    the normal civic with vtec was, if i remember correct 110ps.
    but it's a high rpm machine, i think contineu racing trafficlights, wil get boring, the engine noise, although it sound pretty sweet.
    but how long with it last?
    a 6000+ rmp machine against a relax running 2.0 engine.
    like i said, you need fast 0-100km/h and when possible, with no noise, you don't want that people can hear you comming.

  • @utub1ng
    @utub1ng 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    what's the full form of TSI??

  • @Hyperious_in_the_air
    @Hyperious_in_the_air 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    only issue I've ever had is that it's port injected, so crap builds up on the inside of the valve heads.

  • @RaWReTrOz
    @RaWReTrOz 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    ahh jeez, i love the word: Twin Charged

  • @heatoneGR
    @heatoneGR 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @hugostv you think...search it about piston upgrades rod upgrades bigger becks custom exhaust manifolds with external's and bigger turbo with reprogrammed ecu or even new ecu custom programmed...but i agrre if you put bigger turbo is going to blow up...like all other cars i think...

  • @CainG88
    @CainG88 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    The supercharger enhances airflow into the engine, making a purer air fuel mix, reducing emissions and improving fuel economy. The turbocharger makes use of waste exhaust gas to improve power output, therefore making even more use out of the fuel.

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    i see the Golf R20 will be a 5-valve engine and the v8 tdi is a 5 valve engine.
    and maybe some of the 6 cyll diesel are 5 valve.

  • @VULN3T
    @VULN3T 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    TSI was founded by Lancia in the 80s for the Lancia Delta S4 (Rally group B), baby!

  • @the26thhour
    @the26thhour 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's all cool, very cool but I wish they'd just stick to rear wheel drive, front &/or mid mounted boxer 4
    & yes, I know the beetle was rear mount, having a 71 superB

  • @miguelrivera1282
    @miguelrivera1282 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    E TECNOLOGIA EXCELENTE MUITO BEM

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is different than GDI engines.
    this engine can 'regarding it's mode' run on a ultra lean mixture, much less than the 1 to 14.x required optimal mixture.
    per combustion stroke it injects 2 different mixtures a rich and a lean around the rich mixture, preventing the engine to get hot and burn every last particle of gasonline.

  • @ulef19
    @ulef19 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @SuperBeatnuts Unreliable only in the wrong hands..

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    there several 5 valve engines in the list. of 2009.

  • @HAPKAH
    @HAPKAH 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Those newer generation engines are less reliable and more costly in maintenance.
    Maybe FSI is more reliable than TSI...

  • @dasrice8229
    @dasrice8229 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    These TSI engines are now suffering from a lot of major engine failures at low mileage too. Timing chain problems and piston/ring problems.VW has pushed the envelope too far and unfortunately the consumer is paying the price.Avoid at all cost.This engine is a liability. Stick with diesel or higher cc normally aspirated for lower maintenance.

  • @AlexDIIM
    @AlexDIIM 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    ESATTO. Poi con una testa Triflux rende ancora di più. :)

  • @dgurevich1
    @dgurevich1 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have the SEAT Leon with a 90kw engine.
    Why that? it has the same mechanical parts as the golf, yet 10,000$ cheaper.
    The interior quality suffers, I know, but I bought this car for the sole purpose of sporty driving, and, trust me, it delivers spectacularly.
    currently producing 125bhp and 200nm of torque
    when I chip-tune it, it will be 158bhp and 270nm.
    can't wait.

  • @tkx86
    @tkx86 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Shame they fudged software here in oz and piston rings let go on em along with water pumps.

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    no, a electronic direct injected diesel is real good for people.
    it's almsot impossible to kil the engine at traffic light when releasing the clutch accidental.
    it has loads of torque, it runs good, they reach 5000 rpm quickly.
    you visit the gas station litle.
    i drive 1700 km to get home in the netherland in exactly 16 hours, non stop drive.
    with litle more than 1.5 tank (50 liters)
    @ exactly 120km/h non stop, i only needed to acellerate @ toll gates.
    wanted to test my 90hp, topped it @ 210kmh

  • @sweetbounty
    @sweetbounty 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    for sure 2.0 wih 150 PS arent economical..
    long time ago honda reach 160 PS from 1.6 engine. (benzin)
    which "new" line of VW engines are 5 valves system ?

  • @krutto
    @krutto 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    @j0d0k Who owns AUDI?

  • @sweetbounty
    @sweetbounty 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    hmm well I saw one s60 T5 and if u compare this to vectra 2.5 V6 24 V it is a real rocket , u can get 7 sec to 100km/h easily so it's not bad as a salesman's car...
    IMO 5 cylinder 2.5 capacity with turbo is better than same 2.5 V6 6 cylinder without turbo...
    I asked u coz i want to know how reliable this cars are.. especially engines.
    BTW if u want drive really cheap put there an sequential LPG installation but Only Landi Renzo Omegas.

  • @markoni1986
    @markoni1986 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    pioneering technology for petrol engines my ass!!!!
    this technology is 10-15years old...

  • @1600tdci
    @1600tdci 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    @nireland90 japan is in asia

  • @sweetbounty
    @sweetbounty 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was talkin about 5 valves per cylinder, where did I wrote that 4 valves per cylinder is wrong? lol
    I see you aren't a mechanic so u need read more about GDI FSI and knows why they putted this technology into cars if Japanese don't want to developed it.. (BTW Renault had similar engine too called I.D.E. - not produced any more)

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    no, never drove it, but i did repair a volvo 850 t5 estate, police in holland used it.
    the police in the U.K. also.
    it's a car for salesman on the road.
    (due to economical reasons), i have a '94 vectra 2.5 24v stocked, a engine designed by coswordt, 5 speed gearbox, only 170hp and something like 2100 pounds in weight, it's a rocked.
    4 cyl with gearbox, are better for the 50km/h speed limit
    stop and go traffic makes a 5-6-8 cyl engine lazy, to much gear change or drive high rpm in 2nd gear.

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    we littaraly race in the cities.
    it's to crowded for the policia to function probaly in order to do something about it.
    but going like 80km/h where 50 is alowed is not uncommen here in rush hour.
    on the highway it's 'somewhat' publicly accepted to drive 140, where 120 is alowed.
    i don't think you would be beabled to drive here on your first day, without getting scared.
    i can asure you, it's scary as a passanger.
    it goes hard here on the roads.

  • @questionssm
    @questionssm 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    no, most companies already know how to make tiny 1.4L 4 cylinders.

  • @themooddisorders
    @themooddisorders 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    @jubaiyagyu Lucky guy having one of those cars

  • @dgurevich1
    @dgurevich1 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I use 95 unleaded, and have the same power...
    The difference between this and an aftermarket engine, is this power has to come from normal fuel.

    • @thomasjohnson6080
      @thomasjohnson6080 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      95 Unleaded? Where do you buy that? All over the American southeast the standard premium grade is 93 octane Unleaded with regular Unleaded at 87 octane. At some stations in the Carolinas, you can buy "Racing Fuel" which is 100 octane and costs about twice the price of regular. But I don't think I've ever seen 95 Unleaded.

  • @tkx86
    @tkx86 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4th engine I have done so far on this CAV engine.... LOL

  • @warninshoarmy
    @warninshoarmy 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    TSI turbochager all : 1-5 km/liter on highway,below 1 km/liter in city and average 1 km/liter

  • @socalltd
    @socalltd 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    @sstcECOTECsstc i would dissagree in fuel economy, VW turbo engines have a flat torque band. the best way to achive economy is more usable torque. there is no lag and if driven gently it can do very well on the highway

  • @sweetbounty
    @sweetbounty 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    yyy tell me what u mean writing "no" coz I have no doubt that Diesel are good for people. I don't know with what or who u argue ?
    it;s madnes to reach 5000 rpm in diesel coz they reach max power at 4000. (in mostly)
    hmm i never saw those result in consumption in normal car 2.9 liter per 100km.. what car and engine ?

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    the old citroen AX 1100 was caple of getting faster to 70km/h than a bmw 750.
    litle fast cars are real fun to 'rally' in.
    bigger cars are more dangerous to drive sporty, because of the weight in the cornes.
    litle cars are fun, you don't need speed, you need fast 0-100km/ times.
    i think that0's the most importand factor in european minds

  • @mohsenomran3
    @mohsenomran3 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    i wish to work for volkswagen

  • @sweetbounty
    @sweetbounty 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    I did - there's no new 5 valves engines ( rest is all know old engines)
    anyway s60 T5 got 250 PS so there is no way u could beat it without serious modifications in vectra engine (stock had 8 sec to 100km/h)
    I u consider about economy put an LPG there.
    generally automatic gearboxes sucks

  • @oilhammer04
    @oilhammer04 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    VW will most likely require high priced oil. The transmission fluid is also ridiculously expensive.

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    check my typos, there are more than one of them.
    i know it's only 1 chain on the 4 cyl and 2 of these chains on some of the v6.
    europeans have a more tight tax system.
    some people like diesel, but want buy one, because they don't make that many km anualy. people that drive lots, like 60.000, but a diesel.
    diesel cars are higher taxed @ buy and anualy.

  • @y2kjorgeavila
    @y2kjorgeavila 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice work
    The next hated race for the saving of money.
    china, Europe,? Hybrid,Electric,Water,and Air. I like that air.
    Save the water for plants and us.

  • @luminaeus
    @luminaeus 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @MyChemicalJasper483
    We're getting there, Chevy has 140bhp coming out of a 1.4, but it's designed for more fuel economy than the VW engine. I love American engines but drive a GTI :)

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    i forgot, you also need the fuel tank.
    voila

  • @warninshoarmy
    @warninshoarmy 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    TSI TURBOCHARGER,TFSI TURBOCHARGER,TFSI TWIN TURBOCHARGERS can use petrol octance 98-100,

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    people demand fast smal cars.
    smal for the parking, fastt on the lane.
    people could ave bigger engine here, but they also like to trotle alot.
    many people also like to go on land road and enjoy to curve road, like personaly rally or something, i realy love to achieve the fasted possible speed around a corner of wich i got sorft of a fan of it.
    i hate long roads.

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    diesel cars have also a higher resel price, than gasoline engines.
    you can buy a used audi a8(8 years old) for 10.000€ +/-, you can buy a smal diesel new for 10.000 and stil resel for it more than 2000€ after 8 yeas.
    : )
    those a realy market data.

  • @svengrunberg1202
    @svengrunberg1202 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Problems: The engine exhaust 1000 times more particles than a modern diesel engine with particulate filters [TV germany: "VOX auto mobil", 26.01.2014]. Over the EGR comes the particles to the intake side and pollute the inlet valves. The exhausts get more and more toxic and the engine can fail. This is an gradual process and a expensive problem for the car owner.

    • @JohnAbrahamsen
      @JohnAbrahamsen 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not anymore. The new EA888 1.8TSI and 2.0TSI has the traditional injectors in the inlet manifold and also direct injectors in the head. The inlet injectors will clean the backside of the inlet valves...

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    why, many 2.0 engine are tuned for economy and don't even reach 150hp(atleast in that time).
    marking technical, it's a good number.
    1600 engine did around 90hp in that ....
    why, vw, still sells 5 valve engine.
    the only mistake, i might see here, that it is more exspensive, it need more parts and interruptions of the production line, to build others.

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    wel, normal families here in europe that never suffered some financial problems or some kind of aditions.
    exchanges his car when it's exactly 2 years old.
    they only think about the resel value.
    it's suposed to be that most of the cars older than 15 years or so are on the scrap yard.
    their no collectables.
    accept for some specials cars.
    but even our specials, like the opel manta, the C kadet and stuff like the 2002ti, bmw 323i,190 2.3 16v, the first m3, even they disappeared total from the view.

  • @sweetbounty
    @sweetbounty 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    not in regular cars
    wiki - no comment
    thats why Europe developed a turbo diesels with direct injection...
    sorry coz u absolutely wrong , todays cars are heavier and bigger - yes, u need alot of tourge thats why we have very strong torque diesels
    Europe isn't a US where benzine is cheap..

  • @sweetbounty
    @sweetbounty 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    i drive 1700 km to get home in the netherland in exactly 16 hours, non stop drive.
    with litle more than 1.5 tank (50 liters)
    I understood that u buyed a 50 liters for 1700 - u could write I tanked 75 per 1700km - write more specific pls. (it's normal now...)

  • @AudioCrossingVideos
    @AudioCrossingVideos 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    We Americans just did, Ford gets 202bhp out of a 1.0 liter 3-cylinder.

  • @sweetbounty
    @sweetbounty 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    U see? I aksed which are now. If golf r20 is a sucessor of r32 (who got VR6 4 V) he will have a tuned 2.0 TFSI engine (270 PS) so it's not 5 valves per cylinder engine for sure.
    V8 TDI is 4 vales per cylinder engine
    S8 4.2 V8 5V (360 KM) was

  • @sweetbounty
    @sweetbounty 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    well what can I say. Buy a turbocharged benzin engine... but if someone think that it will be economical (especially in street race) so he is wrong
    I like small and light cars too but not for journeys or normal race - bigger cars are more stable especially when u drive fast (about 160-200km/h) and are safer, small cars are ok but in the city..

  • @whatabeast56
    @whatabeast56 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Signæl Jasper We dont build midget engines. Have fun with all that power going to the front wheels...

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    i think some of the first rolls bently or bugatti used this technology first.
    Such designs have been around since at least 1912 (Peugeot) and perhaps earlier.
    source: wiki
    people here in europe want eco and fast engine for daily use.
    you don't need alot of torque, you just need to move yourself mostly of the time.
    otherwise rent a van.

  • @spark300c
    @spark300c 16 ปีที่แล้ว

    The tsi is answer to yesterdays requirements not tomorrows requirements. Most of advances are evolutionary not revolutionary. Tomorrows requirements are engnies that get better thermal effecncey than fuel cells. high Torqure

  • @flatblackstrat
    @flatblackstrat 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im in the market for a new 2011 Golf Variant. Anyone who has experience with them please send me a message as a have a few questions. Thanks.

  • @warninshoarmy
    @warninshoarmy 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    NO ECONOMY WITH TSI TURBOCHARGER,TFSI TURBOCHARGER IN 1.8,2.0 on road : A4 1.8 TFSI WITH 2,400L/100km on highway,2,000L/100km in city, A4 3.2 FSI : 10L/100km in city,7.5L/100km on highway,A4 2.0 TDI ; 13L/100km in city,9.9L/100km on highway.

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    who said anything about 2.9 liter / 100km.
    i ried to say, i covered france completely (997km) in a almost non stop trip, if it wasn't for toll gates with only 1 tank filling.
    vw wagens promised 50liter per 100km/h (or 5l to 100km) and their promise was true.
    i kept my foot in a certain position, that the car always kept cruisig non stop 120km/h.
    (i should have bought that handle for the steeling colom, to enenable cruise control).

  • @warninshoarmy
    @warninshoarmy 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Audi TFSI turbo all,TFSI twin turbo all : easy damage,no economy( 1-5 km/liter on highway,below 1 km/liter in city),overload,unstable power output

  • @elave16
    @elave16 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    pfff clearly you have never seen a ford focus rs with 301 bhp from an 2.5 liter .. the thing with hp per liter is devious, because how much of that power do you have avaliable at any given time? ... despite all that I love turbos, they make for slower engines than NA but I love my 1.8T when it wooshes away ..

  • @sweetbounty
    @sweetbounty 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    because more than 4 valeves per cylinder is using in high RPM engines (bikes ect) who gives u power in very high RPM, In normal engines where u need a max torque available as low as possible more than 4 valves gives u nothing and put the max torque very high what is not economical and uncomfortable
    Like u see the Japanese who put 4 valeves per Cylinder (far before Germans start to do that) didn't put however a 5 valves per C. to cars engines ? guess why

  • @Jaspervandeno
    @Jaspervandeno 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    that comment was posted a year ago so I didn't know

  • @sweetbounty
    @sweetbounty 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    if u were right noone would buy an diesel.. but u wrong.
    Europeans are very economical and practice and thats why they like new type of diesel who gives u power and economy..

  • @naturalyshocked
    @naturalyshocked 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    clearly, not it's '94 car
    : )
    i'm planning to buy a used audi A8 4.2 or 3.3 diesel. it has a better fuel economy than the vectra.
    restore the drive train from a tot z (gearbox, suspention, differentials, wheel bearings, axles) and drive it til falls apart.
    (depending on how i get it, i overhaul this or the other, but wheel bearings, axles and suspention wil be overhauled.
    i have been thinking about this cars for over atleast 3 year
    the dsp is cool, it's slighly faster from 0 to 100km/h.

  • @dannyboy485
    @dannyboy485 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @evydaemon Nothing wrong with the turbo on this engine,just muppets treating turbo like crap ie. not letting turbo cool down before turning off,revving the shit out of it when its cold and not bothering to change the oil.
    Whats not cost effective about this engine?the extra fuel you would use in a 3.0 l v6 could buy the car after three years.

  • @sweetbounty
    @sweetbounty 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    u wrote chains if I'm correct there is only 1 chain in 1.8 ...
    2.5 Tdi is a V6 so.. its obvious but tehe's a cam belt too.
    125 in this engine is weak. I would never say that there is a 125 PS - misunderstanding
    1.8 was a mistake and VW group give up this technology. that's all.

  • @warninshoarmy
    @warninshoarmy 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Porsche biturbo petrol engines : easy damage,no economy( 1-5 km/liter on highway,below 1 km/liter in city),overload,unstable power output

  • @bffb83
    @bffb83 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    strato you clearly haven't a clue. No american car has ever produced so much power from such a small displacement engine. Not even Ferrari are producing that sort of power per cylinder

  • @NaeJoy
    @NaeJoy 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a 1.4 with 180bhp that can be remapped to 220.