This is just another FFP bullshit. If your going to have a salary cap it needs to be a flat figure. By linking it to turnover the likes of Man U will continue to effectively spend what they want and always have an almost bullet proof advantage over other clubs who cannot hope to compete
@@aryan.4855 You've always spent big money, it nake no difference how deep the pockets of your owners are you'll always spend more than the rest of the league
@@aryan.4855 your ALREADY the biggest spenders in the world 🤣🤣🤣 classic Man U fan living in an alternative universe where you don't have every single advantage.
BUT and a big BUT, once upon a time, there was only the big 4, now there is big 6! Isn't that progression? Btw, Chelsea could totally get relegated if they continue to play football the way they did this season.
These rules would be just like the existing rules, in that they are designed to protect the old, established clubs, that have already established fanbases in the far east. Whenever a cap, whether thats spending or salaries, is expressed in terms of turnover, that means automatically Man Ut d, Liverpool, Barca, Madrid will have an unfair advantage over everyone else.
You don't get it. The oligarch clubs distort the market at the top end and that trickles all the way down thru the leagues to clubs that can't afford it and go broke. FFP doesn't just protect the tradition top 4 clubs, it protects all the clubs except for the 2 or 3 sports wash clibs. It makes all clubs more competitive because player wages and transfers are under control.
@@adtastic1533 Sorry I do get it. Facts are, the current rules and the proposed rules mean the likes of Man Utd and Man City could have identical owners, with equal financial capacity, both Middle Eastern states, neither in danger of going bankrupt or into administration…..to all intents and purposes identical clubs but Man Utd will be able to spend 4x Man City because they have half a billion fans in the far east, where Man City have basically people in Manchester. How is that going to to be “fair play”? True fair play would mean absolute spending and wage caps that were equal for every team in every division. But big clubs won’t want that.
@@korporalkarrot funny how you lot are now concerned about fair play once Manchester United are about to get bought by Qatar,but nobody cared about fair play when Chelsea,Man city ,Newcastle where bought 😂Meanwhile United are one of the only few that constantly churn out players from the youth team , why use Man city lack of fans to defend them ,like United is the only team with fans in the far east, Chelsea ,Liverpool,Arsenal,Tottenham,Everton have always had bigger and global fan base than Man City.
Thats the difference between Ferguson and Pep - Ferguson robbed the smaller teams tapped the players and signed them for next to nothing and Pep was forced to pay the £100 million for Grealish due to the clause. Ferguson was a fraud, cheat and a bully and already Pep's has two trebles in harder leagues and it's something Ferguson is unable to match until the end of time.
Absolute horseshit United never bullied smaller teams for there best players they paid fair Rio Ferdinand was bought for 30 in 2003 Rooney for 30 in 2006 always paid the lower teams good money also Ferguson didn't spend the equivalent of 400million to make a defence Fergie is beyond Pep not even close
linking to turnover makes absolute no difference. a cap applied to all clubs would be much fairer but wont happen as players will just leave the EPL and follow the money. If all of Europe applied the same cap then it could possibly work.
It will be very high, higher than what PSG, Madrid is paying their players. Only few clubs could actually spend ad much wage cap is. But atleast there will be celling.
Heavily heavily needed. But not as a passive thing but as a established rule within the league. Like the MLS which probably has the best parity in world football.
So what about the floor? The nfl nba must use 90% of the cap. MLB has no upper limit, no lower limit, and no luxury tax. 10+ year contract. The NBA has a luxury tax, but the contracts are complicated. NFL contracts are not guaranteed. Also, while in US sports all contracts and salaries are public, in Europe we do not know the players' salaries as they are all estimates. My opinion is that in European soccer both cap and floor should not be introduced, and in soccer salary and contracts should be disclosed accurately.
I can’t understand why these big clubs aren’t bringing through their own homegrown footballers ,what are the doing wrong in the process of training young kids?? If they need a goalkeeper,defender ,midfielder or striker then train the kids better you have in your academy’s think how much you could save & reduce ticket prices !
English football has a global audience because it is the home of football, why the hell should the fans at other clubs accept an elite clique kept in place by virtue of been good or lucky at just the right time ? Cap salaries at the same level for all clubs or scrap FFP and let owners spend what they want, no need for it to jeopardise a clubs future if you put rules in place stopping debt been put on the club and make the debt the owners.
if you do what you just suggest football will die as a sport. this is what has happened to rugby and many clubs after the owners lose interest they go under
Jordan - "I don't think FFP is there to enshrine the elite" Also Jordan -"We should continue with the same model of FFP because the Premier League need Man U, Liverpool, Man City, Arsenal, Chelsea to be roaring in order to sell the product around the world"
@5:42 As an American, I disagree. I wouldn't want to watch a league where the same team(s) won the championship EVERY year. The whole appeal of (American) sports, as a fan, is that each year the team you support has a _chance_ to win it all. He's basically saying clubs like Aston Villa, QPR, etc shouldn't even bother trying to get international fans because no one is going to support a loser.
@@marcusosborne9184 personally I don’t think you should be paid more than 500k a year to kick a ball around. These people are treated like gods for playing a kids game.
The top six, with one glaring exception, earn their money from genuine sponsors and revenue from the millions of fans they have. The bottom six, will not have millions of fans worldwide to boost revenue. Clubs will find a way to get around any 'cap'. Saracens in rugby did until they got found out. There is no solution to this.
That seems weirdly timed. I want to see what Man Utd is capable of in the market and wage bill with the addition of Qatari money. The morality/ sportswashing ship sailed long ago. It's too late for this and I don't know if it's even legal. US sports are so much more fair and less predictable because you can't buy success( not MLB of course). England allowed countries to buy clubs and now those clubs are outspending everyone and the league is uncompetitive lol
You’d like that wouldn’t you? Look at city winning the league every year. Money can certainly buy you success, without the money, there’s no Halaand, De Bruyne, and e Guardiola.
American sports suck. No relegation/promotion. No actual clubs, just franchises. What exactly are you fighting for? There are no stakes in US sports. The losing teams get the same as the winning team.
If you listen to what Simon explains within the first 40 seconds, he gives to explanations of what FFP is there for...and I think most educated people will know it's the latter of the two. It is brought in to protect the cartel. It is more or less impossible for any club today to became a new Citeh or PSG and Chelski. When Newcastle was bought (which the self-proclaimed big 6 opposed), the FFP restrictions and rules of sponsorship were changed to benefit the top clubs in Europe. I would argue any club in Europe would have bigger chance to upsetting the status quo if FFP rules was removed all together.
Imagine they now want a salary cap after fifteen years of united blowing wages and city doing whatever they want with no rules adhere to 115 charges ffp doesnt aplly to city bro so why should it apply to us
The only fair way is all teams can spend the same amount of money eg 400m as suggested that enables non big 6 clubs to be able join the party if they get a rich owner who is willing to spend their own money. Otherwise you have a cartel like we do now. It cannot be based on turnover because the established biggest clubs will never be caught therefore have an unfair advantage. Look at everton had investment from an owner but penalised due to income so he wasn't allowed to spend his own money but chelsea this season we're able to go crazy due to turnover. If you want a fairer competitive product this is the way forward.
Question why cant players wages be cappped to 35K to 100K....the transfer fee capped to 0 millions to 100 million...then every club would know that every top player is coming because they want to play for the club....players make enough money from sponsors I would think they would get away with 100k a week,like at the end of the day i have to pay to play the game....why dose football players get millions to play it....at the end of the day they are doing what im doing kicking a ball maybe better than me but not 1million pound a week better
With Bosman came the vital swing from Clubs having power to players and agents. The pendulum has swung too far with Sponsors now the true owners of players. FIFA and UEFA need replacing. It’s proved they’re in the same pocket. Look what’s happening to fan representation at the prestige events. It’s all seats for money and to Hell with the fans. It needs to stop! Football is ours, not for the few!
Say you buy a small club with a small turnover. You want to increase turnover. You can only do that with better players only you cant get those better players because you cant pay them since the salary you can pay them is capped.
, isn't it because the nfl's hard cap is because the player's union is weak? NFL contracts are not guaranteed. Mahomes is a $450 million contract, but only $140 million is actually guaranteed. Lamar Jackson gets $260 million, but only $185 million guaranteed. Tom Brady played from 2000 to 2023, but his career salary was $333 million, similar to NBA player Westbrook. This is also for quarterbacks only, and Travis Kelce only got a $20 million guarantee. I think all nfl contracts should be guaranteed.
Stop this top 6 rubbish are Chelsea bigger than Newcastle i don't think so and no am not a Geordie leeds are bigger than man city on fanbase whilst you mention big 6 you let down every other club spurs may not get in champions league for a while do they drop out of big 6
What is wrong? If you win, your turnover is larger, you can spend more money, more money means better players, better players mean you win again, and that is cycle.
@@franemartinic2521 Yes, managing and performing well generate success and wealth. The idea of a 70% of turnover wage restriction is to prevent ugly excesses, losses and debt….
Heres a fact...these huge rich super clubs..bring in jobs...massively boost local economies...and have made premiere league arguably the best in world. We shouldnt do anything to jepodise that...instead make sure money feeds down to lower leagues. Look at brighton..newcastle who did a squad tebuild with just 250 million...they can still compete with right manager and players...
But do the generate the same revenue? There are some passengers in the Premier League who are benefitting from the strong teams which are selling the Premier League brand abroad. If all teams are made to be mediocre, not many people outside England will be watching PL.
I dunno, the one thing I love with football compared to other sports is knowing that all the clubs aren't equal and it just makes the football culture so rich! If they were equal we would never get moments like 'LEICESTER WON THE PL!!' or 'CHELSEA DOWN AT 12th" making the sport bland.
@@sidkumar9838 There's no sport where competitors are equal. Take for example tracks events. Athletes from poor Countries don't have facilities as those who come from rich Countries. Neither do they have Physios and gyms of equal standards. But when Olympics or any competition comes they're competing as equals.
@@tomodul2619 Yes of course, In international sports, that's inevitable. I was referring to club sports like the NFL or IPL, where each club gets an equal fixed amount to spend per season. It's fair, but personally, it's less interesting for me. With football clubs, the heritage, fan following, and owners influence a club's success or failure. Look at this season alone, Chelsea broke all the transfer spending records with a loaded owner but finished poorly, while Brighton, with financial constraint adopted a strategy for several years of recruiting niche unknown players and are now competing with the top 6. These kinds of stories only happen in football and I love it, even if it's unfair, haha!
America is the home of Capitalism but they were smart enough to realize that to keep the NFL exciting and unpredictable every year a strict Salary cap was necessary. To prevent a few teams harvesting the Top Players like in Football in Europe. Arguably the richest owner in the NFL is Jerry Jones of the Dallas Cowboys. With his great wealth he was able to build the best stadium in the NFL but it cannot give him a competitive advantage on the Field. The cowboys have not won the superbowl since 1996. Maybe thats why American owners like Todd Boehly are gravitating to the Premier League. The spending spree he has done at Chelsea would simply be impossible in the NFL.
Because there's no such thing as complete freedom in life, because you have to live with other people, so there will never be a 100 percent capitalist society
Simon Jordan talking through his ar$e again. Its very common for businesses, that are trying to grow and take market shares from big established market leaders, to lose vast sums of money at first. You have to spend like the market leaders in order to compete and thus grow/take market shares. If FFP was about fairness then every club would start every season with the same wage and transfer budget (closed market) or they could all spend what ever they want to (open market). FFP was created and implemented to keep the status quo for hierarchy clubs. It is complete bull$hit and the fact more clubs have finiacial collapsed under FFP, than before FFP, shows its not there to protect clubs.
It’s a UEFA rule, uefa have been saying this for a few years because of prem clubs huge spending, to say that it’s solely city and not basically most prem clubs spending compared to other leagues spending is ludicrous
@@Geokinkladze well yeah, do you not remember city spending like 150 million back in 08, Real Madrid spent like 80mil and they’d sold Robinho for 40million, City were not dominating in 09 mate
@@rhys2091 Lots of things are unheard of but the fact is Platini introduce the rule saying "We just want clubs to spend their own money" Which is all City have ever done.
No one seemed to mind Mercenary City or Newcastle getting Arab owners but when United may get it....Whoa! Unfair! Stop this! You are a hypocrite, my friend
I don’t think it will happen because English people like having the same few legacy clubs dominating the league. They don’t want clubs like Luton winning the premier league- not that there’s anything necessarily wrong with that.
Man City were in league 1 (division 2, the third tier of English football) only 24 years ago. Man united haven’t won the league in 10 years. Leicester won the league a few seasons ago. You’re talking waffle 🧇
It will happen in England, what are you not understanding about it being a UEFA law, and it will not effect anything in the slightest, just stop certain clubs huge spending to help other European leagues compete in the market, tell me when Luton or any small team will ever have a revenue of nearly a billion?
I think fifa and uefa need to put a ban on transfer fees over 100m. You have middle table clubs requesting 80-100m on players and it is ruining football.
@@rc9719because historically there was no problem with teams spending 5 million. It’s issue when clubs like West Ham; wolves, Aston Villa, Leciester, Brighton request close to 100 million for players who ain’t world class.
Why do Spurs keep getting branded as a big club id say aston villa and westham are just as big if not bigger than spurs villas trophy cabinet certainly says that
You can't have a salary cap...it goes against employee protection
This is just another FFP bullshit. If your going to have a salary cap it needs to be a flat figure. By linking it to turnover the likes of Man U will continue to effectively spend what they want and always have an almost bullet proof advantage over other clubs who cannot hope to compete
The pl know we getting Qatar and decide to introduce salary cap to try to stop us from spending big money.
@@aryan.4855 You've always spent big money, it nake no difference how deep the pockets of your owners are you'll always spend more than the rest of the league
@@scottevans5689 we spent 220 million last summer, this summer we can spend extra 120 if we get Qatar.
@@aryan.4855 We don't win games with money, this ain't FIFA 23 😂
@@aryan.4855 your ALREADY the biggest spenders in the world 🤣🤣🤣 classic Man U fan living in an alternative universe where you don't have every single advantage.
They don’t want anyone breaking in to the big 6
BUT and a big BUT, once upon a time, there was only the big 4, now there is big 6! Isn't that progression? Btw, Chelsea could totally get relegated if they continue to play football the way they did this season.
These rules would be just like the existing rules, in that they are designed to protect the old, established clubs, that have already established fanbases in the far east. Whenever a cap, whether thats spending or salaries, is expressed in terms of turnover, that means automatically Man Ut d, Liverpool, Barca, Madrid will have an unfair advantage over everyone else.
You don't get it. The oligarch clubs distort the market at the top end and that trickles all the way down thru the leagues to clubs that can't afford it and go broke. FFP doesn't just protect the tradition top 4 clubs, it protects all the clubs except for the 2 or 3 sports wash clibs. It makes all clubs more competitive because player wages and transfers are under control.
@@adtastic1533 Sorry I do get it. Facts are, the current rules and the proposed rules mean the likes of Man Utd and Man City could have identical owners, with equal financial capacity, both Middle Eastern states, neither in danger of going bankrupt or into administration…..to all intents and purposes identical clubs but Man Utd will be able to spend 4x Man City because they have half a billion fans in the far east, where Man City have basically people in Manchester. How is that going to to be “fair play”?
True fair play would mean absolute spending and wage caps that were equal for every team in every division. But big clubs won’t want that.
@@korporalkarrot I agree, true fairness is a wage amount that all clubs have to work to. That would create evenness and sustainability.
@@korporalkarrot So you are against them being sustainable....ok
@@korporalkarrot funny how you lot are now concerned about fair play once Manchester United are about to get bought by Qatar,but nobody cared about fair play when Chelsea,Man city ,Newcastle where bought 😂Meanwhile United are one of the only few that constantly churn out players from the youth team , why use Man city lack of fans to defend them ,like United is the only team with fans in the far east, Chelsea ,Liverpool,Arsenal,Tottenham,Everton have always had bigger and global fan base than Man City.
Thats the difference between Ferguson and Pep - Ferguson robbed the smaller teams tapped the players and signed them for next to nothing and Pep was forced to pay the £100 million for Grealish due to the clause. Ferguson was a fraud, cheat and a bully and already Pep's has two trebles in harder leagues and it's something Ferguson is unable to match until the end of time.
Absolute horseshit United never bullied smaller teams for there best players they paid fair Rio Ferdinand was bought for 30 in 2003 Rooney for 30 in 2006 always paid the lower teams good money also Ferguson didn't spend the equivalent of 400million to make a defence Fergie is beyond Pep not even close
20 years ago & 20 years now is a very different level, don't compare this bs again, feel disgrace 😂
linking to turnover makes absolute no difference. a cap applied to all clubs would be much fairer but wont happen as players will just leave the EPL and follow the money. If all of Europe applied the same cap then it could possibly work.
It will be very high, higher than what PSG, Madrid is paying their players. Only few clubs could actually spend ad much wage cap is. But atleast there will be celling.
Heavily heavily needed. But not as a passive thing but as a established rule within the league. Like the MLS which probably has the best parity in world football.
Salary cap is an owner's wet dream and the player will never allow it.
A cap would make the sport more entertaining.
So what about the floor? The nfl nba must use 90% of the cap. MLB has no upper limit, no lower limit, and no luxury tax. 10+ year contract. The NBA has a luxury tax, but the contracts are complicated. NFL contracts are not guaranteed. Also, while in US sports all contracts and salaries are public, in Europe we do not know the players' salaries as they are all estimates. My opinion is that in European soccer both cap and floor should not be introduced, and in soccer salary and contracts should be disclosed accurately.
I can’t understand why these big clubs aren’t bringing through their own homegrown footballers ,what are the doing wrong in the process of training young kids?? If they need a goalkeeper,defender ,midfielder or striker then train the kids better you have in your academy’s think how much you could save & reduce ticket prices !
Yeah it's easy isn't it.
English football has a global audience because it is the home of football, why the hell should the fans at other clubs accept an elite clique kept in place by virtue of been good or lucky at just the right time ?
Cap salaries at the same level for all clubs or scrap FFP and let owners spend what they want, no need for it to jeopardise a clubs future if you put rules in place stopping debt been put on the club and make the debt the owners.
if you do what you just suggest football will die as a sport. this is what has happened to rugby and many clubs after the owners lose interest they go under
@@glen5861 Why would the billionaire owners at a whole raft of clubs that currently can't compete suddenly lose interest if they could compete ?
Jordan - "I don't think FFP is there to enshrine the elite"
Also Jordan -"We should continue with the same model of FFP because the Premier League need Man U, Liverpool, Man City, Arsenal, Chelsea to be roaring in order to sell the product around the world"
@5:42 As an American, I disagree.
I wouldn't want to watch a league where the same team(s) won the championship EVERY year. The whole appeal of (American) sports, as a fan, is that each year the team you support has a _chance_ to win it all.
He's basically saying clubs like Aston Villa, QPR, etc shouldn't even bother trying to get international fans because no one is going to support a loser.
been saying this for 10 year, glad talksport finally woke up.
True people don't want to hear it because of player and team worship but if affects the whole league
@@marcusosborne9184 personally I don’t think you should be paid more than 500k a year to kick a ball around. These people are treated like gods for playing a kids game.
How do we get to have at least half of the Premier League clubs in with a chance of winning the title at the start of each season.?
Lord Jordan = Top LAD Proper Clobber ✊💯 Facts
LFC Spectre = Top LAD Proper Clobber, one of the mighty Jordanites.
Facts 😉
500k a week cap on wages and 150m cap a fiscal year on transfers that can only be increased with player sales. Done
@@cccc9299 deals may only include the player signed. Done
The top six, with one glaring exception, earn their money from genuine sponsors and revenue from the millions of fans they have. The bottom six, will not have millions of fans worldwide to boost revenue. Clubs will find a way to get around any 'cap'. Saracens in rugby did until they got found out. There is no solution to this.
We want fair not just sustainable…… they should all be capped by max figures no matter what you earn or spend
Former owner suggests that player earnings are the problem.
Market forces, Simon. Market forces.
That seems weirdly timed. I want to see what Man Utd is capable of in the market and wage bill with the addition of Qatari money.
The morality/ sportswashing ship sailed long ago.
It's too late for this and I don't know if it's even legal.
US sports are so much more fair and less predictable because you can't buy success( not MLB of course).
England allowed countries to buy clubs and now those clubs are outspending everyone and the league is uncompetitive lol
You’d like that wouldn’t you? Look at city winning the league every year. Money can certainly buy you success, without the money, there’s no Halaand, De Bruyne, and e Guardiola.
American sports suck. No relegation/promotion. No actual clubs, just franchises. What exactly are you fighting for? There are no stakes in US sports. The losing teams get the same as the winning team.
@ivan arriola is that factual?
The cap must be the same for every body not not that advantage crap Utd had in the 90s
If you listen to what Simon explains within the first 40 seconds, he gives to explanations of what FFP is there for...and I think most educated people will know it's the latter of the two. It is brought in to protect the cartel.
It is more or less impossible for any club today to became a new Citeh or PSG and Chelski. When Newcastle was bought (which the self-proclaimed big 6 opposed), the FFP restrictions and rules of sponsorship were changed to benefit the top clubs in Europe.
I would argue any club in Europe would have bigger chance to upsetting the status quo if FFP rules was removed all together.
Imagine they now want a salary cap after fifteen years of united blowing wages and city doing whatever they want with no rules adhere to 115 charges ffp doesnt aplly to city bro so why should it apply to us
If they cap salaries clubs will just pay higher bonuses
No, it wouldn’t work like that. Well, it shouldn’t, the agreement would be structured to not allow that.
The only fair way is all teams can spend the same amount of money eg 400m as suggested that enables non big 6 clubs to be able join the party if they get a rich owner who is willing to spend their own money. Otherwise you have a cartel like we do now. It cannot be based on turnover because the established biggest clubs will never be caught therefore have an unfair advantage. Look at everton had investment from an owner but penalised due to income so he wasn't allowed to spend his own money but chelsea this season we're able to go crazy due to turnover. If you want a fairer competitive product this is the way forward.
Question why cant players wages be cappped to 35K to 100K....the transfer fee capped to 0 millions to 100 million...then every club would know that every top player is coming because they want to play for the club....players make enough money from sponsors I would think they would get away with 100k a week,like at the end of the day i have to pay to play the game....why dose football players get millions to play it....at the end of the day they are doing what im doing kicking a ball maybe better than me but not 1million pound a week better
With Bosman came the vital swing from Clubs having power to players and agents. The pendulum has swung too far with Sponsors now the true owners of players. FIFA and UEFA need replacing. It’s proved they’re in the same pocket. Look what’s happening to fan representation at the prestige events. It’s all seats for money and to Hell with the fans. It needs to stop! Football is ours, not for the few!
Why is avram glazer the thumbnail?!
Say you buy a small club with a small turnover. You want to increase turnover. You can only do that with better players only you cant get those better players because you cant pay them since the salary you can pay them is capped.
That's not how it works
🤦
To impliment a salary cap is stupid
If that was the case a few years ago , Man U and Fergie wouldn't have won half of what they won , they offered the highest fees and salaries 😁
, isn't it because the nfl's hard cap is because the player's union is weak? NFL contracts are not guaranteed. Mahomes is a $450 million contract, but only $140 million is actually guaranteed. Lamar Jackson gets $260 million, but only $185 million guaranteed. Tom Brady played from 2000 to 2023, but his career salary was $333 million, similar to NBA player Westbrook. This is also for quarterbacks only, and Travis Kelce only got a $20 million guarantee. I think all nfl contracts should be guaranteed.
Stop this top 6 rubbish are Chelsea bigger than Newcastle i don't think so and no am not a Geordie leeds are bigger than man city on fanbase whilst you mention big 6 you let down every other club spurs may not get in champions league for a while do they drop out of big 6
The 6 biggest clubs in England in alphabetical order in my opinion
Arsenal
Aston villa
Chelsea
Liverpool
Man city
Man utd
Leeds aren't even the biggest club in Yorkshire, that's Sheffield Wednesday bigger history, better stadium, historically more fans than Leeds.
This is never going to happen.
Protecting the cartel is 100% on the money
The problem with percentage of turnover is that clubs lie, cook the books and get 115 charges levied against them.
Think you need to learn English
And you're club doesn't??
@@mcfcok3773 not even one charge, let alone 115.
@@astro9219 you keep believing that.
@@mcfcok3773 yeah not all clubs cheat like city. Tainted club.
What’s wrong with 70% of turnover ?
Makes sense
What is wrong? If you win, your turnover is larger, you can spend more money, more money means better players, better players mean you win again, and that is cycle.
@@franemartinic2521 Yes, managing and performing well generate success and wealth. The idea of a 70% of turnover wage restriction is to prevent ugly excesses, losses and debt….
As if there wasn't rules when Man City were breaking them like nobody's business 😂😂😂
Proof please
So cap the EPL and send the best players to other leagues for greater salaries then?
The cap will be very high, probably higher than wage bill of any club. But there will be celling.
Heres a fact...these huge rich super clubs..bring in jobs...massively boost local economies...and have made premiere league arguably the best in world. We shouldnt do anything to jepodise that...instead make sure money feeds down to lower leagues. Look at brighton..newcastle who did a squad tebuild with just 250 million...they can still compete with right manager and players...
I would love it so much if each team was given the same budget. May the best run club win and would be a truly fair competition.
But do the generate the same revenue? There are some passengers in the Premier League who are benefitting from the strong teams which are selling the Premier League brand abroad. If all teams are made to be mediocre, not many people outside England will be watching PL.
I dunno, the one thing I love with football compared to other sports is knowing that all the clubs aren't equal and it just makes the football culture so rich! If they were equal we would never get moments like 'LEICESTER WON THE PL!!' or 'CHELSEA DOWN AT 12th" making the sport bland.
@@sidkumar9838
There's no sport where competitors are equal. Take for example tracks events. Athletes from poor Countries don't have facilities as those who come from rich Countries. Neither do they have Physios and gyms of equal standards. But when Olympics or any competition comes they're competing as equals.
Spoken like a true commie.
@@tomodul2619 Yes of course, In international sports, that's inevitable. I was referring to club sports like the NFL or IPL, where each club gets an equal fixed amount to spend per season. It's fair, but personally, it's less interesting for me. With football clubs, the heritage, fan following, and owners influence a club's success or failure. Look at this season alone, Chelsea broke all the transfer spending records with a loaded owner but finished poorly, while Brighton, with financial constraint adopted a strategy for several years of recruiting niche unknown players and are now competing with the top 6. These kinds of stories only happen in football and I love it, even if it's unfair, haha!
America is the home of Capitalism but they were smart enough to realize that to keep the NFL exciting and unpredictable every year a strict Salary cap was necessary. To prevent a few teams harvesting the Top Players like in Football in Europe. Arguably the richest owner in the NFL is Jerry Jones of the Dallas Cowboys. With his great wealth he was able to build the best stadium in the NFL but it cannot give him a competitive advantage on the Field. The cowboys have not won the superbowl since 1996. Maybe thats why American owners like Todd Boehly are gravitating to the Premier League. The spending spree he has done at Chelsea would simply be impossible in the NFL.
Yet they earn far more 😁
Because there's no such thing as complete freedom in life, because you have to live with other people, so there will never be a 100 percent capitalist society
Simon Jordan talking through his ar$e again. Its very common for businesses, that are trying to grow and take market shares from big established market leaders, to lose vast sums of money at first. You have to spend like the market leaders in order to compete and thus grow/take market shares.
If FFP was about fairness then every club would start every season with the same wage and transfer budget (closed market) or they could all spend what ever they want to (open market). FFP was created and implemented to keep the status quo for hierarchy clubs. It is complete bull$hit and the fact more clubs have finiacial collapsed under FFP, than before FFP, shows its not there to protect clubs.
Seems like it will send more players to saudi
Simon just jumping through all the hoops.
Ffp is bs, if u want to be fair has to be a cap, it’s that simple.
Cook the books like city
Don’t all clubs have to agree unanimously for new rules to go through? If so this won’t ever happen.
Utd,Pool - Monopolize PL
Salary Cap,FFP - not needed
City - dominate all rich PL
Salary Cap,FFP - much needed?🤔
It’s a UEFA rule, uefa have been saying this for a few years because of prem clubs huge spending, to say that it’s solely city and not basically most prem clubs spending compared to other leagues spending is ludicrous
@@rhys2091 UEFA introduced FFP the year City were taken over.
@@Geokinkladze well yeah, do you not remember city spending like 150 million back in 08, Real Madrid spent like 80mil and they’d sold Robinho for 40million, City were not dominating in 09 mate
@@Geokinkladze they spend nearly double there revenue on transfers, practically unheard of
@@rhys2091 Lots of things are unheard of but the fact is Platini introduce the rule saying "We just want clubs to spend their own money"
Which is all City have ever done.
It will only make the prem weaker
No one seemed to mind Mercenary City or Newcastle getting Arab owners but when United may get it....Whoa! Unfair! Stop this! You are a hypocrite, my friend
No-one seemed to mind when Newcastle got Saudi ownership??? Do you live under a rock?
Man U spent the most what are you talking about Man U needs to be looked into
I don’t think it will happen because English people like having the same few legacy clubs dominating the league. They don’t want clubs like Luton winning the premier league- not that there’s anything necessarily wrong with that.
Man City were in league 1 (division 2, the third tier of English football) only 24 years ago. Man united haven’t won the league in 10 years. Leicester won the league a few seasons ago. You’re talking waffle 🧇
It will happen in England, what are you not understanding about it being a UEFA law, and it will not effect anything in the slightest, just stop certain clubs huge spending to help other European leagues compete in the market, tell me when Luton or any small team will ever have a revenue of nearly a billion?
A non legacy club has won 6 out of 7 .... you happy with that. 115 rule breaches?
@@2tallGamingMedia but Man City had won the last 8 of 10?? Like that’s not any better
Are you basically saying English football fans hated it when Leicester won the league
The American modal is not socialist!!!
I think fifa and uefa need to put a ban on transfer fees over 100m. You have middle table clubs requesting 80-100m on players and it is ruining football.
Yeah right when Fergi was spending left and right, stealing best players from other clubs and paying refs, he was beautifying football right? 😂
Why 100m why not 5 million ?
@@eL--RaLthe highest SAF spent was like 30 million on RVP.
@@rc9719because historically there was no problem with teams spending 5 million. It’s issue when clubs like West Ham; wolves, Aston Villa, Leciester, Brighton request close to 100 million for players who ain’t world class.
@@aryan.4855 That era of price tag was equivalent to today's 100 mil price tag kid 😂😂
City is gonna break the rules again😂
Child, you really are rattled lol. Its just a football game, how many similar coments you have left here? Its not healthy haha
@@H8M0ndays lmao I'm old enough to know City broke the rules for 10 years now my boy..
@@leroy9511 yet you act as lil salty child, parents must be proud of you boy
@@H8M0ndays Seems like you the salty one about my folks being proud me .. relax darling I know you a City fan and I struck nerve somehow I'm sorry..
@@leroy9511 Its only football, dont be so rattled boy
Communism in football karl max knew something was wrong 😂😂😂😂
Okey men united antony 100 million 😂 okey liverpool darwin 100 millon 😂
Just cheat
Spot on by Jordan
What has what the top teams get outside of Prem TV money got to do with the MINIMUM tv revenue. As usual an idiotic non sequitur from the club killer
Why do Spurs keep getting branded as a big club id say aston villa and westham are just as big if not bigger than spurs villas trophy cabinet certainly says that
Because Beyoncé and Taylor swift shake their booties at white hart lane. Levy is planning a Roman style orgy as well.
A form of communism in football haha what waffle
FFP - favors Established Clubs
Salary Cap - to favor Established Clubs?🤔
VERY GOOD UEFA! City will continue to reign besides no one could have stopped them anyway as long as Pep is there 💙😎😂😂😂😂