Russian rococo is very much underrated in general. Didn't know Gurilyov at all but this movement is really crisp and not at all a conventional commonplace, energetic and charming
Same here. Just came across this composer today. Love this piece can’t wait to practice it! Sounds like so much fun. Will have to research more of his work.
Agréable surprise ce petit dépaysement et voyage dans le temps pour découvrir sur un autre instrument le répertoire de ce compositeur russe. Merci et un grand bravo !
It’s an interpretation difference. The performer adds ornamentation here and there and omits some of the grace notes on some of the fast passages. I do like omitting some of the grace notes too, not sure if there are score differences but like the way this performer plays it.
@@PianoScoreVids Just curious, what piano did you record this on? Was it a real piano or a digitized one something like a VST? I have a 6' grand but of course, doesn't sound anything like the piano on this recording.
Я, не знаю , но почемуто , мне эта музыка слышится в звучании , другого музыкального инструмента - клависина.Спасибо.Чудесное исполнение и грандиозная музыка.
Ze is openbaar domein, en net zoals alle andere klassieke werken kan je ze vinden op IMSLP. Veel speelplezier! imslp.org/wiki/Piano_Sonata_No.1_(Gurilyov%2C_Lev)
I rarely accuse composers of plagiarism, but the first theme of this piece is exactly identical to the first theme of Lebrun’s oboe concerto n.1, also in d minor. They’re really too close to be coincidental.
Interesting. The idea however can be still coincidentally the same. In my math studies I learned that sometimes theorems were proven indepentently of each other almost exactly at the same time. This seems to me even much more unlikely than a theme in I-V , but the fact that it is even the same tonality is strange indeed
The oboe concerto is very interesting so thanks to you for that tip. And the theorem I refer to is I think nothing else than the famous and very important fundamental theorem of Algebra, but I forgot the names of these mathematicians. But I remember that this "independently of each other" thing happened more than once. Also, the theme is not +exactly+ identical by the way. If you look closely you can see that one note is different and the repeated noted is completely different too, it goes straight into the dominant in one, but stays in the tonic in the other one.
@@PianoScoreVids beautiful piece right? yea you’re right about the harmonic progression which is slightly different between the two compositions. And in France we attribute the fundamental theorem of Algebra to d’Alembert, but I guess we’re pretty much the only ones to do so 😄
It is not even in 2 voices, but in fact just one voice. Indeed not very interesting. But this applies to 99% of today's pop music also and millions are willing to listen to it. So on the Russian country side a° 1794 this will have sounded as pure genius.
Russian rococo is very much underrated in general. Didn't know Gurilyov at all but this movement is really crisp and not at all a conventional commonplace, energetic and charming
so much energy! and so clean. ive been listening to this on repeat for about an hour now, i cant wait to read through it tomorrow.
Same here. Just came across this composer today. Love this piece can’t wait to practice it! Sounds like so much fun. Will have to research more of his work.
Very beautiful sonata. I have come back there listen so many times.
Many parts are quite similar to Mozart's Sonata No.16 1st mvt.
Agréable surprise ce petit dépaysement et voyage dans le temps pour découvrir sur un autre instrument le répertoire de ce compositeur russe. Merci et un grand bravo !
love the sound of fortepiano , and the harmonique march
I am playing this piece for my piano lesson, it's so lovely
What a beautiful piece!
BELÍSSIMO!
Just lovely, thank you!
Hermoso, gracias ❤
Danke!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Super!!!!
I love yours video
wow now you've also got a fortepiano
it's a digital vst
I was wondering too. I could hear the sound 👍🏽👍🏽
А теперь послушайте Лебрун концерт для гобоя ре минор....
Score at 0:49 (bb.29-30 if I've counted correctly) is different than the audio. Score revision, or simply a performance difference?
probably a performance diff
It’s an interpretation difference. The performer adds ornamentation here and there and omits some of the grace notes on some of the fast passages. I do like omitting some of the grace notes too, not sure if there are score differences but like the way this performer plays it.
I'm the performer by the way
@@PianoScoreVids That is awesome! Great job, I hope to be able to play it 1/2 as good as you one of these days. Just started practicing it yesterday.
@@PianoScoreVids Just curious, what piano did you record this on? Was it a real piano or a digitized one something like a VST? I have a 6' grand but of course, doesn't sound anything like the piano on this recording.
Я, не знаю , но почемуто , мне эта музыка слышится в звучании , другого музыкального инструмента - клависина.Спасибо.Чудесное исполнение и грандиозная музыка.
Я, тоже, слышу клавесин!
You have made mistake with surname of composer in short description under your video. Two letters are mixed up.
Is this piano tuned a half step down
415
Hello Gamma. Where you take this records? It is copiright free?
Played by himself
waar kan ik die partituur aanschaffen?
Ze is openbaar domein, en net zoals alle andere klassieke werken kan je ze vinden op IMSLP.
Veel speelplezier!
imslp.org/wiki/Piano_Sonata_No.1_(Gurilyov%2C_Lev)
I rarely accuse composers of plagiarism, but the first theme of this piece is exactly identical to the first theme of Lebrun’s oboe concerto n.1, also in d minor. They’re really too close to be coincidental.
Interesting. The idea however can be still coincidentally the same. In my math studies I learned that sometimes theorems were proven indepentently of each other almost exactly at the same time. This seems to me even much more unlikely than a theme in I-V , but the fact that it is even the same tonality is strange indeed
@@PianoScoreVids so who’s Newton and who’s Leibniz here? 😄 anyway, the piece certainly deserves to be played, and you did a great job.
The oboe concerto is very interesting so thanks to you for that tip. And the theorem I refer to is I think nothing else than the famous and very important fundamental theorem of Algebra, but I forgot the names of these mathematicians. But I remember that this "independently of each other" thing happened more than once. Also, the theme is not +exactly+ identical by the way. If you look closely you can see that one note is different and the repeated noted is completely different too, it goes straight into the dominant in one, but stays in the tonic in the other one.
@@PianoScoreVids beautiful piece right? yea you’re right about the harmonic progression which is slightly different between the two compositions. And in France we attribute the fundamental theorem of Algebra to d’Alembert, but I guess we’re pretty much the only ones to do so 😄
Yes, but I have to check it out in full length. Are you a mathematician too? :)
It's not d-moll playing, e-moll
I think, it is played in cis-moll, not e-moll
it's 415hz tuning
perfect pitch be like: (I'm also perfect pitch and I'm annoyed)
Лебрун. Концерт ре минор для гобоя с оркестром. th-cam.com/video/hD9ESQ4Y8Bc/w-d-xo.html
Редкая музыка. Гурилев-папа. Но пианинка все портит.
A bad copy of Mozart
Boring second rate music
you don't have to listen to it
Gamma1734 you’re right, I didn’t after the first couple of minutes……a cheap Mozart, very cheap
It is not even in 2 voices, but in fact just one voice. Indeed not very interesting. But this applies to 99% of today's pop music also and millions are willing to listen to it. So on the Russian country side a° 1794 this will have sounded as pure genius.
The writing is a bit simple, but there is fire.
It is not very complicated and quiet simple harmonically, but can you write something better?