[Logic] Mathematical Induction

[@sumandeeptoor1976]

I understood the mathematical induction for the first time after, you explain everything so nicely. Thank you so much for your help!

[@skdfever2707]

honestly sir you are a grade saver for me had i known your chanel before I would have done all the semester with amazing grades but still you teach very well .

[@AnonYmous-bo2zo]

The person you are refering to in the begining is called Gauss

[@chen2329]

You can also use Distributive Property instead of Factor Law on this:
k * (k+1) + 2 * (k+1) = (k+2) * (k+1)
I mean, no need to expanding everything to
k^2 + k + 2k + 2
which is kind of confuse.
Nevertheless, thank you for your series of videos!

[@danilojonic]

Yes, this is a faster but more advanced way, some people might not notice it and would go the standard route.

[@cognizantic5798]

We used to write 'hence proved' at the end! Thanks for the class

[@lora-p8z]

Why is Pk+1 true @8:32?

[@davidlr97]

i like u trevtutor

[@bonbonpony]

How about the difference between weak and strong induction?

[@milenaa_autic]

4:58 why do you add that k+1?

[@md2525]

same question

[@nurtiny1024]

I think by adding k+1 to the assumption (k(k+1))/2, you are proving n = k+1 to be true

[@santoriomaker69]

He didn't, he substituted the [1 + 2 + 3 + ... + k] part from the expression [1 + 2 + 3 + ... + k] + (k + 1) into k(k+1)/2, which yields the result [k(k+1)/2] + (k + 1)

[@pauliunknown8118]

it was Gauss!

[@kristynicole6201]

How do your vides not have thousands of likes? You are literally saving me in Discrete Math. Thank you SO MUCH.

[@k.alipardhan6957]

6:40 "And that's how a duck quacks!"

[@BiloForSenate]

Very helpful.

[@teekay3747]

Oh man thanks

[@mikebliss5845]

Woohoo!

[@nobetcierdemkralfmarsiv]

dit is kanker goeie shit niffo wollah thanks

[@jeroenblue]

echt wel