Hey people, I just compiled a huge PDF-bundle to this video that contains all compositions / styles shown at the beginning of the video. PLUS 9 newly conceptualized sheets guiding through short improvisational tutorials / progressive exercises to each of the styles. If you're interested, check it out on my PATREON-page: www.patreon.com/posts/9-fancy-in-83393701?Link&
Oh my God, there's so much material here! Incredible bunch of tutorials; thanks for sharing this. And the timestamps are looking good! I'm happy you like them :)
Hey thx, glad that you like it! If you're really interested, drop me a mail and I'm gonna send ya a PDF... (you'll find the mail address on the channel page)
That's an amazing video! By just watching the introduction and examples this felt impossible to understand and do, but the tutorials make it seem possible!
Hey Julien, I find this an excellent comment that's really helpful. I should have conceptualized that video a little different. This is still a fairly advanced tutorial and people are probably put off because of similar irritations like you had. But actaully I noticed the last years: it's definetely possible to train/transpose/internalize rather complex building blocks. AND: In comparison to what the Jazz cats transpose/learn/internalize this is still on a comparable mediocre level of difficulty. Just have a look at Jimin Dorothy's Channel and the Fauxbourdons from my video will appear quite doable in comparison to that... Thanks for watching!
@@brandonbuxton8960 7-6-sequence means 7-6-suspensions which I consider a standard decoration of a 6th-chain. 8 1/2 - I think the story about style No 5 isn't really a proper tutorial...
10:50 are the two upper voices considered forbidden fifths? Having never studied theory I always wondered how often I was violating correct harmony but now I just don't really care I go in and out of traditional harmony as I please by ear.
Yes and no: as this is the pre exercise leading to the actual figurative structure one is ought to play those to get a grip of the chordal shape as in the final result: broken chords, arpeggios those are kinda ‚hidden‘ and composers tolerate those. If you wanna see an original example like this, check out Chopin‘s E minor Waltz, 2nd page where he does a very similar Fauxbourdon… BTW: there is not such a thing like „correct harmony“, there is just styles. Correct harmony is a 20th century textbook invention that abstracts from historical styles to generalize a discipline for academic teaching purposes - as it turned out: to it‘s own harm. A modern day music theory is already reflecting on this kind of matters… but of course this kind of discourses have not yet hit youtube yet.
HA Mr. John Rothfield back on the track, alright sir! :DDD I see I see, well I'd answer with a question: when it is aledgedly "less noble as counterpoint" how come this schema has very obviously the longest life span of them all?
I think I have a bunch of these that just sort of grew out of playing in this style a lot but I'd never encountered this term fauxbourdon...what does it mean? 😂
Boss :D Everything you can see on my channel is beeing conceived by thoroughbass figures + bass degrees. 9-8-7-6-chain means these exact intervals forming a sequence above a stepwise descending bassline + implied additional intervalls like the third. From 12:18 on there's a little explanation section on this model including a score.
@@en-blanc-et-noir I think a good video would be maybe how schumann writes such interesting harmonies, like in every kinderszenen there is a different pattern
Can the 7-6 be played as 753 - 653 or does the 5 change the quality too much? I ask because it's much easier to grab 753 but descending from 2 in the bass to 1 sounds kind of incomplete..
The 7-6-suspension is an embellishment of a simple 6th-chord and is commonly applied to chains of 6th-chords, so: NO😂✌️ how does it make things easier as you say? And the other thing about the bass: what are you referring to exactly? When you descent from 2-1 you‘ll attach a complete cadence anyway would you?
@@en-blanc-et-noir Thank you for clarification. I was thinking of 7-6 as two separate units of chords rather than a 6th chord with a suspension. Is it easy to slip into more modern thinking I guess. Makes things easier because my hands know the feeling of these shapes having played some jazz. Going from 2 to 1. I feel compelled to play 643 to 53.
![ลองสั่งของจากแอพ temu ถูกจริงหรอ?? ( part : 1/2 ) [โกงไหมครับ ep.89 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RTcZSQTiDZw/mqdefault.jpg)
What fantastic nerdism, bravo!
This is freakin' phenomenal. Best channel for grown-ups on youtube. Thanks!
grown-ups lol✌️😝
This is the greatest TH-cam video I’ve ever seen
haha :DDD alrighty
Hey people, I just compiled a huge PDF-bundle to this video that contains all compositions / styles shown at the beginning of the video. PLUS 9 newly conceptualized sheets guiding through short improvisational tutorials / progressive exercises to each of the styles. If you're interested, check it out on my PATREON-page:
www.patreon.com/posts/9-fancy-in-83393701?Link&
Oh my God, there's so much material here! Incredible bunch of tutorials; thanks for sharing this.
And the timestamps are looking good! I'm happy you like them :)
Glad you popped back into my feed. I thank you, and I thank my past self for subscribing to you.
haha, love it!
you are spoiling us! thanks! : o )
exactly! :D
What a gem of a channel. Keep it up?
Haha, thank you very much!
Is that a question?
@@en-blanc-et-noir That was a typo but I guess could be interpreted as asking you for more :)
You're the best ! We need more of this haha
Dude what a video! Keep doing this amazing material! ❤
This video blew my mind away. Thanks!
haha! :D many thanks for watching
@@en-blanc-et-noirDo you offer these lessons with PDF to your Patreon supporters?
Great video... Worthy of a few years study. Try to apply it to violin or guitar.
That was wonderful. thanks so much!
Amazing.
Oh mein Gott... dieser Kanal ist so unglaublich geil.
LOL :DD love it
So good. Thank you!!
Thank you very muuuuch
Terrific !! To be watched again and again in slow motion. Do you happen to the pdf scores in a postable/linkable format?
Hey thx, glad that you like it! If you're really interested, drop me a mail and I'm gonna send ya a PDF... (you'll find the mail address on the channel page)
That's an amazing video! By just watching the introduction and examples this felt impossible to understand and do, but the tutorials make it seem possible!
Hey Julien, I find this an excellent comment that's really helpful. I should have conceptualized that video a little different.
This is still a fairly advanced tutorial and people are probably put off because of similar irritations like you had. But actaully I noticed the last years: it's definetely possible to train/transpose/internalize rather complex building blocks. AND: In comparison to what the Jazz cats transpose/learn/internalize this is still on a comparable mediocre level of difficulty. Just have a look at Jimin Dorothy's Channel and the Fauxbourdons from my video will appear quite doable in comparison to that...
Thanks for watching!
just beautiful
pure gold. Thanks
Gran trbajo y síntesis Maestro.
Muchas gracias!
Very great video sir thank you so much sir ❤️
thanks again❤️
Lovely....simple....Thank You :)
thx, Peter
👏🏽
3,6, 9
im new to this stuff and the terms, hard to keep up
ha! that's ok, as I consider this a more "advanced" tutorial in comparison to the others
disculpa qué es el fauxbourdon?
Do you make books for classical improvisation.
Thx for commenting, Brandon! I'm afraid no... I'm sorry.
No problem thank you for responding you are awesome I’m trying to soak up your great videos!
Also when you mention 7 6 sequence are you talking about 7-6 suspensions? And what is 8/1+2 if I may ask.
@@brandonbuxton8960
7-6-sequence means 7-6-suspensions which I consider a standard decoration of a 6th-chain.
8 1/2 - I think the story about style No 5 isn't really a proper tutorial...
Thank you one of my favorite channels!
10:50 are the two upper voices considered forbidden fifths? Having never studied theory I always wondered how often I was violating correct harmony but now I just don't really care I go in and out of traditional harmony as I please by ear.
Yes and no: as this is the pre exercise leading to the actual figurative structure one is ought to play those to get a grip of the chordal shape as in the final result: broken chords, arpeggios those are kinda ‚hidden‘ and composers tolerate those. If you wanna see an original example like this, check out Chopin‘s E minor Waltz, 2nd page where he does a very similar Fauxbourdon…
BTW: there is not such a thing like „correct harmony“, there is just styles. Correct harmony is a 20th century textbook invention that abstracts from historical styles to generalize a discipline for academic teaching purposes - as it turned out: to it‘s own harm. A modern day music theory is already reflecting on this kind of matters… but of course this kind of discourses have not yet hit youtube yet.
Brahms op. 24.
Faux bourdon uses "parallel" motion therefore it is less noble as counterpoint... What say ye to this?
HA Mr. John Rothfield back on the track, alright sir! :DDD I see I see, well I'd answer with a question: when it is aledgedly "less noble as counterpoint" how come this schema has very obviously the longest life span of them all?
I think I have a bunch of these that just sort of grew out of playing in this style a lot but I'd never encountered this term fauxbourdon...what does it mean? 😂
th-cam.com/video/j9y5N13un9s/w-d-xo.html
Wait what do the numbers 9-8 7-8 chain mean
Boss :D Everything you can see on my channel is beeing conceived by thoroughbass figures + bass degrees. 9-8-7-6-chain means these exact intervals forming a sequence above a stepwise descending bassline + implied additional intervalls like the third. From 12:18 on there's a little explanation section on this model including a score.
@@en-blanc-et-noir oh ok
@@en-blanc-et-noir I think a good video would be maybe how schumann writes such interesting harmonies, like in every kinderszenen there is a different pattern
Can the 7-6 be played as 753 - 653 or does the 5 change the quality too much? I ask because it's much easier to grab 753 but descending from 2 in the bass to 1 sounds kind of incomplete..
The 7-6-suspension is an embellishment of a simple 6th-chord and is commonly applied to chains of 6th-chords, so: NO😂✌️ how does it make things easier as you say?
And the other thing about the bass: what are you referring to exactly? When you descent from 2-1 you‘ll attach a complete cadence anyway would you?
@@en-blanc-et-noir Thank you for clarification. I was thinking of 7-6 as two separate units of chords rather than a 6th chord with a suspension. Is it easy to slip into more modern thinking I guess. Makes things easier because my hands know the feeling of these shapes having played some jazz.
Going from 2 to 1. I feel compelled to play 643 to 53.