Shaswath grew as a journalist today! Logical to the point , Class rendition on Rohit's and MI's situation! Rohit needs to show some self respect and move on from MI and take a professional decision for himself and try winning the IPL elsewhere!
No need to prove again and I have a wild theory that hardik and Rohit have reached to a arrangement where hardik will captain MI and Rohit will captain india and both will support each other... Rohit will stay in Mumbai
Since Nikhil and Siddharth are unable to understand the situation of MI. Let me make it cinematic for you, so it would be easy to understand. An ancient kingdom with all talk and no wins was looking for a new ray of hope. Now comes a young Warrior who returns back home after winning many battles away. As soon as he lands a war starts, with their old battle hogs battling hard, but barely hitting their opponents. Soon they tire out and drop their swords, now from the blood and ashes our Warrior wields the sword and wins the War for the Kingdom. As a ruler he wins many battles as they come and creates an identity for their Kingdom. To safeguard the Kingdom, he grooms many junior warriors for the sake of people. Now one of the kids, who was trained by our Warrior Usurps the crown out of Greed and with help of hands. The people of the Kingdom, now in anger want to throw out the Usurper and want their Warrior on the crown. Usurper not only steals the crown, but destroys their own kingdom which leads to internal struggle. Now let's say these hands who helped the Usurper, go back to the Warrior just to keep their power and win future wars. What should be the Warriors answer for them with Usurper still wearing the crown?
if Hardik stays as captain Rohit and Surya wont be there bumrah may stay, If Surya becomes captain Rohit and bumrah will stay Hardik 100% gonna leave, same for bumrah but chances are less for bumrah as captain
What does The left side guy think about rohit sharma?? Is he sitting duck with the bat?? Why the guy is talking so much like rohit will be pushed out in other teams?
Hi sports today team i hv a question, isn't better to have 1 or 2 tentions and the rest to be RTM as this allows all the franchise level playing field at the auction. and not allow some teams to retain multiple top players by paying them by other means. please include my question im a biggest fan of sports today. and its the only channel i watch to get authentic news
Then what's the purpose of building a team and finding talent and nurturing them. Atleast a retention of 5 players is must for teams like MI and KKR because they have got players who might go big in auction. But there are teams like punjab where they can go with 6 RTM so this retention rule is the best so far.
Can you guys again read a rule number 7 of IPL. It seems that players like Dhruv Jurel, Varun Chakraborty, Parag, Nilesh Reddy will be uncapped as they have never received a central contract till now even if they have played for India in last 5 years.
Central contracted players are merely 30 players there are 8 indian players in the XI in one ipl team so read the rule again. It's states that one should either played a match before 5 years or they shouldn't be in the XI for 5 years. Even if someone hasn't played for 10 years but with a central contract won't be considered uncapped.
@@sarankirthic4532 A capped Indian player will become uncapped if the player has in the last five calendar years preceding the year in which the relevant Season is held, not played in the starting XI in International Cricket (Test match, ODI, Twenty20 International) or does not have a Central Contract with BCCI. This will be applicable for Indian Players only. If you not able to understand this you contact your English teacher. If in this statement there was AND instead of OR then what you said was right but it is not the case.
@@Prashant-t8q A player who has not debuted for their national team is classified as an uncapped player. However, beginning this season, an Indian player who has not been part of the playing XI in any international format or held a BCCI central contract within the last five years is also considered an uncapped player.
@@Prashant-t8q First of all try to understand the rule which you have said and once again go through your question before lecturing me. Scenario 1. A player will be considered uncapped if he didn't played for india for 5 years preceding the ipl year. Scenario 2. A player will be considered uncapped if he's not been named in the starting XI or he doesn't held a Bcci contract for 5 years. [The OR here describes that a player can be named in the squad and for every series and doesn't get picked up in the XI so if he's a contracted player he can'tbe considered uncapped but with the same scenario if he doesn't held any contract he can be considered uncapped]
@@sarankirthic4532 Bro let me summarize rule number 7 in simple English An player will be considered uncapped for IPL 2025 if he hasn't been in playing 11 for India in any format or does not have an bcci central contract in the last 5 years from 2025. Just understand the official statement objectively and stop watching random youtubers. Read this statement to any for non cricket fans whose English is good. This statement clear af.
shaswath seemed more sensible and unbiased when talking about Rohit Sharma, others seemed like getting payroll from ambani
Shaswath grew as a journalist today! Logical to the point , Class rendition on Rohit's and MI's situation! Rohit needs to show some self respect and move on from MI and take a professional decision for himself and try winning the IPL elsewhere!
No need to prove again and I have a wild theory that hardik and Rohit have reached to a arrangement where hardik will captain MI and Rohit will captain india and both will support each other...
Rohit will stay in Mumbai
@@shridhardeshpande1790Rohit the 🐍 will never support Hardik
@@AS_TH-cam156yes we have who is snake 🐍 chapri
@@shridhardeshpande1790 It's never about Rohit and hardik It's between Rohit and MI.
Since Nikhil and Siddharth are unable to understand the situation of MI. Let me make it cinematic for you, so it would be easy to understand.
An ancient kingdom with all talk and no wins was looking for a new ray of hope. Now comes a young Warrior who returns back home after winning many battles away.
As soon as he lands a war starts, with their old battle hogs battling hard, but barely hitting their opponents. Soon they tire out and drop their swords, now from the blood and ashes our Warrior wields the sword and wins the War for the Kingdom. As a ruler he wins many battles as they come and creates an identity for their Kingdom. To safeguard the Kingdom, he grooms many junior warriors for the sake of people.
Now one of the kids, who was trained by our Warrior Usurps the crown out of Greed and with help of hands.
The people of the Kingdom, now in anger want to throw out the Usurper and want their Warrior on the crown.
Usurper not only steals the crown, but destroys their own kingdom which leads to internal struggle.
Now let's say these hands who helped the Usurper, go back to the Warrior just to keep their power and win future wars.
What should be the Warriors answer for them with Usurper still wearing the crown?
Shahswat is the only one who was in his senses. The middle one was too bad.
if Hardik stays as captain Rohit and Surya wont be there bumrah may stay, If Surya becomes captain Rohit and bumrah will stay Hardik 100% gonna leave, same for bumrah but chances are less for bumrah as captain
Speculating the speculation
You are forgetting one thing. Rohit Sharma is the face of Mumbai Indians and for the fans.
I DON'T KNOW HOW NIKHIL DEFENDED THE BRAND ENDORSEMENT, SPONSORSHIP,SUCH A UNETHICAL FOR THE FRANCHISE (EXCEPT MI,CSK,KKR)
nikhil sir,
one suggestion ki aap 1 hour slot HINDI ka bhi kiya karo please
Now we have mausaji as well in Nikhil !!
What? Lots of south Indians are getting selected based on ranji trophy? Really?
What does The left side guy think about rohit sharma??
Is he sitting duck with the bat??
Why the guy is talking so much like rohit will be pushed out in other teams?
Hi sports today team i hv a question, isn't better to have 1 or 2 tentions and the rest to be RTM as this allows all the franchise level playing field at the auction. and not allow some teams to retain multiple top players by paying them by other means. please include my question im a biggest fan of sports today. and its the only channel i watch to get authentic news
Then what's the purpose of building a team and finding talent and nurturing them. Atleast a retention of 5 players is must for teams like MI and KKR because they have got players who might go big in auction. But there are teams like punjab where they can go with 6 RTM so this retention rule is the best so far.
You are taking the black t-shirt guy's opinion! please dont. The other guy has knows his things
Where is Sid V ??
Can you guys again read a rule number 7 of IPL. It seems that players like Dhruv Jurel, Varun Chakraborty, Parag, Nilesh Reddy will be uncapped as they have never received a central contract till now even if they have played for India in last 5 years.
Central contracted players are merely 30 players there are 8 indian players in the XI in one ipl team so read the rule again. It's states that one should either played a match before 5 years or they shouldn't be in the XI for 5 years. Even if someone hasn't played for 10 years but with a central contract won't be considered uncapped.
@@sarankirthic4532 A capped Indian player will become uncapped if the player has in the last five calendar years preceding the year in which the relevant Season is held, not played in the starting XI in International Cricket (Test match, ODI, Twenty20 International) or does not have a Central Contract with BCCI. This will be applicable for Indian Players only.
If you not able to understand this you contact your English teacher. If in this statement there was AND instead of OR then what you said was right but it is not the case.
@@Prashant-t8q A player who has not debuted for their national team is classified as an uncapped player. However, beginning this season, an Indian player who has not been part of the playing XI in any international format or held a BCCI central contract within the last five years is also considered an uncapped player.
@@Prashant-t8q First of all try to understand the rule which you have said and once again go through your question before lecturing me.
Scenario 1. A player will be considered uncapped if he didn't played for india for 5 years preceding the ipl year.
Scenario 2. A player will be considered uncapped if he's not been named in the starting XI or he doesn't held a Bcci contract for 5 years. [The OR here describes that a player can be named in the squad and for every series and doesn't get picked up in the XI so if he's a contracted player he can'tbe considered uncapped but with the same scenario if he doesn't held any contract he can be considered uncapped]
@@sarankirthic4532 Bro let me summarize rule number 7 in simple English
An player will be considered uncapped for IPL 2025 if he hasn't been in playing 11 for India in any format or does not have an bcci central contract in the last 5 years from 2025.
Just understand the official statement objectively and stop watching random youtubers. Read this statement to any for non cricket fans whose English is good. This statement clear af.
Rishabh as a captain at Delhi has not been very succesful!
Rohit will be in LSG
You guys have no chemistry. Gets a bit annoying.
This guy in the centre is behaving like a creep. Jeez