This lawyer who is talking about maintenance is just bullshit - Even if the man is rich due his ancestral properties, he has to first give interim maintenance, maintenance and then finally alimony during divorce... The logic is a able bodied man hv to maintain his wife.... There is a famous judgement of Delhi HC ( if not wrong) - "Beg, borrow and steal but still you hv to maintain your wife.".... There are "n" no. of cases where physically disabled man has to do crowd funding to pay "alimony"..... And if he can't, then wife can file execution u/s 125(3) CRPC, and the man will be sent to jail... His wordings are like laadke court jakar bolte hain ki mere pass koi kaam, paisa nahi hain aur court bolta hain - nahi beta, koi nahi, ghar jao, aaram karo... aur laadki bechari ghumti rehti hain.... Second this lawyer is giving a justification that since the woman needs money she will file false rape, molestation cases.... Then it shows how inefficient, biased and ineffective Judiciary is to deal with matrimonial cases..... This advocate doesn't want to speak the truth - not only the girl and her family but everyone in the system from top to bottom has due share of the pie.... Atul Subhash has already spoken about it.... What has happened to this judge Rita Kaushik! Nothing...
The system isn’t perfect, and cases like these just highlight how much needs to change. I’m not a legal expert, but I wanted the podcast to be a space where these kinds of issues can be discussed openly. It’s not about defending anyone but shedding light on the perspectives of the reality that so many people are living. Let’s keep the conversation going-your perspective is super valuable.
@@DivyaJainTH-cam I understand Divya that you are anchoring the show and getting the discussion going and you are not a legal expert.. But the point is, these legal experts come to the podcast and spread half baked information, some times blatant false hood... Let me give you an e. g. What is written in statute is a separate issue and what actually happens in reality is another thing... I hope everyone of us knows this..... In CRPC 125, maintenance case the law states that the wife is not entitled to maintenance if she deserts her husband... The whole world knows that the girl deserts the husband, goes to her parents home and lodge the entire "Diwali" package.... So, despite the woman deserting the husband, is given - interim maintenance followed by maintenance and when divorce happens - permanent alimony... So, these legal experts can come and say kaanon mein hain patni agar pati ko chod kar chali jati hai, toh usshe maintenance nahi milega.... Par kya ye aise hota hain nahi? Nahi Aur aam admi jisko law ka koi knowledge nahi usshe toh aap ne galat baat diye? Kya ye dhokadhari nahi hain? Atul Subhash made a profound statement when he said that I don't want my money to be used against me, the ATM is closed - It is happening in 3 levels - 1) We all are paying taxes and part of it goes to "consolidated" fund from where money is used to maintain, give salary to this Judiciary run by a bunch of "entitled, privileged, Nepo product" Brown Sahibs ( 79 families in India control the entire Judiciary) who are mostly plain graduates ( BA LLB) and run "Judiocracy" instead of giving this so called Justice... 2) The left over money is given to the "system" to save oneself entangled in false cases 3) And then, money is given to the wife not only as "alimony" or "maintenance" but also as "litigation expenses"... Basically, I'm giving money to my enemies and telling them use my money and put more false cases upon me.... Do you know Divya, that every court has "legal aid" cell where women's case is fought free of cost.... The expenses obviously borne by the taxpayer..... Even in that case separate "litigation expense" is provided to the wife.... Why? Its very easy to sit in a podcast and say what Atul Subhash did was not correct.... What options hv you people giving him? These people have made every arrangement to squeeze every penny out of the man, violate his basic human rights everyday and then asking him to live? How will he live when you hv taken away everything from him? It is a common affair, esp. in private sector people loose their job... Even if he looses his job he is made to pay up else face jail - reminds me of Indigo plantation history and how farmers were torchered.... Of course, advocate being advocate will say you can file an application under "change in circumstances".... What does that mean, it is waived of? No.... It has effectively become tool for bargaining.... On what? Well, in how many days you can stop the Judiciary from issuing arrest warrant..... In open court, I hv heard judge saying " mujhe pata nahin, maakan bech de, Apne aap ko girwi raakh de, paar etne din o mein paisa bhar de, nahi toh arrest warrant issue Karwa dunga, jail mein saarte rahna." His so called constitutional right of Art 21 torn into pieces by a person sittion in "constitutional position"... And corruption - I'm not even speaking about it.... Everybody is involved in this - Hamam mein saab nange hain - SC ka judge se kisi zille ka peshkar..... Saab..... Aur pura deesh chup hain "Contempt" ke darr se...... Dhanyawad....
This Advocate and others like him are the main LYNCHPIN of this EXTORTIONIST INDUSTRY. These lawyers convince the estranged females and her relatives that, I have with me the list of false cases you should file, so that you can get humungous amount of Alimony. Meanwhile, more the cases, more is the income of lawyers.
If the Delhi court indeed had said to maintain ur wife beg, borrow or steal , I certainly would have stole from someone influential and accuse the judge for instigating and motivating for the robbery and get the judge on trial
Divya Mam. Thank you for covering this issue. Many men are suffering from these issues. Modern day marriages have just turned into legal terrorism. Thank you again for covering this issue. God will give you a lot. Hare Krishna 🙏🙏
@@Marcus_MG42 Bro atleast baat karni to start kiya h warna real life mein no women is talking about it.... Aur gov to thukne to bhi ready nai h mardo pe
How can you judge a man accused without any prior inquiry and investigation by the police and lagal system. 98% cases are false against men. But men cont do anything, no legal remedies to save him from false cases accept to fight the cases for 10 years.even After he acquitted he cont file defamation case against women. What laws are they just made to harras men.
I can feel the frustration in your comment. It’s so unfair when innocent people have to spend years proving their innocence. There aren’t enough safeguards to protect men in these situations. This podcast episode was my way of opening up the conversation, and honestly, I’m still learning from everyone’s input. Thank you for bringing this up-it’s a tough but important issue.
We understand that atul ko sucide ni karna chahiye tha but i m literally not satisfied with solanki ji wordings ki dete raho usko paisa zindagi bhar beemari lagti h tab b lagta h paisa lekin jo aadmi frustrated tha false cases se wo ink jaise lawyers ki vajah se hi hote h q ki ladkiyan aise hi lawyer choose karti hain
50:18 Easy to say. For him, it's a job. For others, it is harassment and mental torture plus financial loss. There are multiple reasons that make India a third world country. Justice system is one of them. He is okay that people lose everything and become a beggar instead of deleting themselves. In the landmark judgment Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India (1978), Supreme Court held that the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 is not limited to mere animal existence but includes the right to live with dignity.
52:57 if there's a genuine case where the husband is deserting the wife or genuinely torturing her (separate matter that it took her 20+ years to make a decision to separate), then wife is definitely entitled to alimony or compensation.. The discussion is entirely related to those scheming and law-abusing women, they don't deserve any alimony
50:34 sir how easy it's to say that paisa hee hai na, monk ban jao etc most of these divorce cases filed against men are false and they make it deliberately ugly because there's huge moolah involved, if not, then no woman would file grave charges like rape etc. "Life is important than money" this is exactly the sentiment they are looking to cash in on
We need a PIL to establish that the gender biased laws are of arbitrary use to violate the constitutional rights of victims. We need a legal person to file this case because a natural person is vulnerable to the exposure of this gender biased laws. If the PIL is rejected then it will be proved that judiciary is a hypocrite.
58:12 Sir, those women in the hinter lands are the real abused ones and the one's that these laws really are made for... But these women cannot afford or dare to hire shrewd and expensive lawyers. They don't avail these laws and continue being oppressed. Mostly the urbane and educated women are availing them is the grave irony
I remember two decades ago in the UK, when fathers would dress up as spiderman or superheroes & climb highway bridges & block traffic because the mothers would not allow visitation access to the kids. Surreal seeing the same legal apathy & processes occuring in India today, seems like India is 20 years behind the western societal state of affairs. If that be the case can we expect a replication of breakdown of society that we see in the west today being manifested in India 2 decades from now - like high divorce rates, war between the sexes, out of wedlock children, single parent homes, MGTOW ( men going their own way), high crime rate in youth because of fatherlessness? The west is hardly able to handle these issues even with govt assisted support & comparitively low corruption levels. How can India handle the mayhem that is to come which seems inevitable with one-sided & nonsensical laws, political apathy, corruption in every govt dept & half the population that is increasingly feeling wronged, unheard & disconnected. Having lived in the west & India, I conclude that though the family structure is broken in the west, it still functions because of social programmes & govt assistance to broken families & children at risk. If a similar family & societal breakdown occur (which ssems likely from the way people are increasing acting nowadays) India would simply implode. Despite the numerous ills, India still totters along solely because of the family unit, the day families start breaking up is the day we can say goodbye to the notion/nation called India. Atul Subhash's act of desperation is a wake up call to all, esp to those who can see what is in store.
In a few decades, I anticipate a breakdown of Indian society. The problem is not being taken seriously by anyone. The symptom is Atul Subhash. India is being held together by the family structure. However, our naive officials, under the influence of copycat activists who blindly follow the West, are putting imported ideas into action without first putting safety precautions in place. For instance, lawyer Suranya Aiyar, who practices in New Delhi, is opposed to the Western Model of Child Protection that many child rights activists want to be implemented in India. For her work, Suranya Aiyar was awarded by Nordic Committee for Human Rights. Our PM Modi talks about Viksit Bharat by 2047. But on a broken third world system.
57:00 agreed to an extent! Moral or behavioral education is gravely missing in schools these days... Every teacher, every school is just mad behind marks, scores and rankings that they fall miserably in outputting better, less selfish and caring humans..sorry state of affairs 😢
Mothers (and mother in-laws or females in-laws) are actually the root cause of all problems, and have been so since the beginning of time in Hindu religion.
झूठ बोल रहे हैं लायर साहब, कि मजबूरी में गलत केसेस डालते हैं, ताकि शादी में खर्च किए हुए 10 करोड़ रुपए वापिस मिले। 10 करोड शादी में खर्च करने वाले इक्का-दुक्का परिवार है। लायर साहब कह रहे हैं वकील का काम है गलत सलाह देना ताकि पति मजबूर होकर सेटलमेंट करे।
Even though the edits were helpful but was not comfortable from a viewing point of view, it looks like a compilation video rather than a one single podcast. If required then make small cuts, rest the conversation was good. If required you can make a separate video of combined related podcast as a separate compilation video.
A lawyer in another podcast said " ONE WOMAN AWARDED MILLIONS IN ALIMONY AND HUGE AMOUNT OF MAINTENANCE, CREATES 100 SUCH CASES IN FUTURE. Because she demonstrated to the other greedy women and corrupt system that this is the most lucrative BUSINESS/INDUSTRY and millions can be earned without doing anything at all but just by filling fake cases.
Chalo koi charcha to samaj sosail midia me suru hui anyatha to sabse salo se pati purusho ko apradhi maan usko marne ke liye akela asahye chor 🙏🙏 we want. Justice atul subash jai shree ram ji 🙏🚩🚩
39.29 "Some men, instead of thinking and working for the development of the country, are searching Google for "how to avoid giving alimony to wife"" the lawyer in the white shirt and black sweater said this. Remains me the famous dialogue by Munna bhiya from Mirzapur "Abey padhai likhai mein dhyan lagao, ias yas bano, aur desh ko sambhaalo, lekin......"
36:39 ladki akeli nahi uska parivar decide karta hai.... Can a man say this same thing for anything? In marriages that fail which involves girl eloping with a guy betraying her parents , then you sympathise with the girl. In failed marriages that involve the girl betraying her lover and listens to her parents and marries a guy, then you blame the parents and let off the girl... so are you saying girls do not have a decision making capability and therefore absolve them of accountability ? Having said this, there are plenty of those women even today that are not coming under any negative influence or pressure from their parents, friends, lawyers in either setting right their marriage or even a going for a graceful divorce
Divya ma'am mere bhi mann mai reh reh kar Atul ji ki tarah strong feeling aati hai, par mere uper meri mata ji kizimedaari hai, meri shaadi ke 2 month baad padhaai ka bolke ghar gayi, phir mere uper 5 case criminal case kar diye, na maine dowry li.. na maine maara peeta, uske pariwar ki poori zimmedari li.. phir bhi jhoote case akk saal se court ke chakkar kaat raha hoon..police advocate sabne dara dara ke paisa loota...mere bhi mann nai karta jeene kaa.. samajh nai aata maine kiya kya
It's not. It's a man vs the elites issue. It's the system, not women. Women are just pawns they use because they know they're the weak link that can be easily manipulated into corruption. Remember, the adam and eve story where the snake approached the woman, not the man. The man will always fall weak to a woman's suggestions because a man is weak only for his woman, nothing else. So once women fall, men will fall, all society falls. Then the elites can easily control the population and reconstruct it in whatever way they want. It's absolute control.
its super easy to say dont make suicide but every men's mental is not same as other men in the society. Mental strength depends on various factors. 1st we have to get rid of terms like "men will be men", men doest cry, men is super strong and of course those who talks about feminism when the law itself is biased on equality.
35:14 Disagree with a counter example. Woman (small businesswomen) told the man (9 to 5 office worker) to do court marriage to save money. Man agreed. After, one year, man is unable to live with the woman and wanted divorce. She filed false cases against him and his family members and even threatened through police whom she knew. Now want to extort huge sums of money. 36:57 I feel he is justifying bad work ethics of advocates.
Just make divorce easy . It will solve most of the problems A lot of problems come because the divorce process us really like the shifty neighbors we have that keep on shaming people pursuing divorce and thus motivates people to nit pick on smallest of ideological differences
35:18 sir why girls jaan boojke nahi karti? They are adults and they can always put their conscience ahead and put their foot down and not go with false cases... It's good that many fora including yours, are being so vocal about men's rights, but pls stop giving this 'benefit of doubt' that girls are forced to charge false cases ... It doesn't make sense for adult women, definitely not for even those that are even 12th pass...see this Nikhitha lady, she's resorting to this exact thing claiming lack of knowledge of the cases that she herself has filed... I mean, they are expected to sign the papers, and I think they're also asked by the judge about the clauses and implications of these cases before proceeding... I don't understand why this kids gloves treatment to these women when men's and their families' lives are at stake !!!
Lawyer ji ramayan base hi hai ek pati patni ke kartvya par, sita ji naa hi kabhi alimoney maanga naahi maintenence, ve to apne bacche ko sashakt h kar apne pita ke vamsh ko age badane me bheja hai
India is lady side law this is worst law lady law is Dengarous childrens life spoel 498A firstly cancelled this after no daivers men & women both happy maintenance many property no giving both men & women so there were self working jobs both are happy life
Aapki meri kisi ki baat supreme court ya parliament ko nahi fark parta. Chup hai sab. Ye tabhi hoga jam hum janta milke ye system ko band kare jo failure hai.
This lawyer who is talking about maintenance is just bullshit -
Even if the man is rich due his ancestral properties, he has to first give interim maintenance, maintenance and then finally alimony during divorce... The logic is a able bodied man hv to maintain his wife.... There is a famous judgement of Delhi HC ( if not wrong) - "Beg, borrow and steal but still you hv to maintain your wife.".... There are "n" no. of cases where physically disabled man has to do crowd funding to pay "alimony".....
And if he can't, then wife can file execution u/s 125(3) CRPC, and the man will be sent to jail... His wordings are like laadke court jakar bolte hain ki mere pass koi kaam, paisa nahi hain aur court bolta hain - nahi beta, koi nahi, ghar jao, aaram karo... aur laadki bechari ghumti rehti hain....
Second this lawyer is giving a justification that since the woman needs money she will file false rape, molestation cases.... Then it shows how inefficient, biased and ineffective Judiciary is to deal with matrimonial cases.....
This advocate doesn't want to speak the truth - not only the girl and her family but everyone in the system from top to bottom has due share of the pie.... Atul Subhash has already spoken about it.... What has happened to this judge Rita Kaushik! Nothing...
The system isn’t perfect, and cases like these just highlight how much needs to change. I’m not a legal expert, but I wanted the podcast to be a space where these kinds of issues can be discussed openly. It’s not about defending anyone but shedding light on the perspectives of the reality that so many people are living.
Let’s keep the conversation going-your perspective is super valuable.
@@DivyaJainTH-cam I understand Divya that you are anchoring the show and getting the discussion going and you are not a legal expert..
But the point is, these legal experts come to the podcast and spread half baked information, some times blatant false hood...
Let me give you an e. g. What is written in statute is a separate issue and what actually happens in reality is another thing... I hope everyone of us knows this.....
In CRPC 125, maintenance case the law states that the wife is not entitled to maintenance if she deserts her husband...
The whole world knows that the girl deserts the husband, goes to her parents home and lodge the entire "Diwali" package.... So, despite the woman deserting the husband, is given - interim maintenance followed by maintenance and when divorce happens - permanent alimony...
So, these legal experts can come and say kaanon mein hain patni agar pati ko chod kar chali jati hai, toh usshe maintenance nahi milega.... Par kya ye aise hota hain nahi? Nahi Aur aam admi jisko law ka koi knowledge nahi usshe toh aap ne galat baat diye? Kya ye dhokadhari nahi hain?
Atul Subhash made a profound statement when he said that I don't want my money to be used against me, the ATM is closed - It is happening in 3 levels -
1) We all are paying taxes and part of it goes to "consolidated" fund from where money is used to maintain, give salary to this Judiciary run by a bunch of "entitled, privileged, Nepo product" Brown Sahibs ( 79 families in India control the entire Judiciary) who are mostly plain graduates ( BA LLB) and run "Judiocracy" instead of giving this so called Justice...
2) The left over money is given to the "system" to save oneself entangled in false cases
3) And then, money is given to the wife not only as "alimony" or "maintenance" but also as "litigation expenses"...
Basically, I'm giving money to my enemies and telling them use my money and put more false cases upon me....
Do you know Divya, that every court has "legal aid" cell where women's case is fought free of cost.... The expenses obviously borne by the taxpayer..... Even in that case separate "litigation expense" is provided to the wife.... Why?
Its very easy to sit in a podcast and say what Atul Subhash did was not correct.... What options hv you people giving him? These people have made every arrangement to squeeze every penny out of the man, violate his basic human rights everyday and then asking him to live? How will he live when you hv taken away everything from him?
It is a common affair, esp. in private sector people loose their job... Even if he looses his job he is made to pay up else face jail - reminds me of Indigo plantation history and how farmers were torchered....
Of course, advocate being advocate will say you can file an application under "change in circumstances".... What does that mean, it is waived of? No.... It has effectively become tool for bargaining.... On what? Well, in how many days you can stop the Judiciary from issuing arrest warrant..... In open court, I hv heard judge saying " mujhe pata nahin, maakan bech de, Apne aap ko girwi raakh de, paar etne din o mein paisa bhar de, nahi toh arrest warrant issue Karwa dunga, jail mein saarte rahna."
His so called constitutional right of Art 21 torn into pieces by a person sittion in "constitutional position"...
And corruption - I'm not even speaking about it.... Everybody is involved in this - Hamam mein saab nange hain - SC ka judge se kisi zille ka peshkar..... Saab.....
Aur pura deesh chup hain "Contempt" ke darr se......
Dhanyawad....
This Advocate and others like him are the main LYNCHPIN of this EXTORTIONIST INDUSTRY.
These lawyers convince the estranged females and her relatives that, I have with me the list of false cases you should file, so that you can get humungous amount of Alimony. Meanwhile, more the cases, more is the income of lawyers.
If the Delhi court indeed had said to maintain ur wife beg, borrow or steal , I certainly would have stole from someone influential and accuse the judge for instigating and motivating for the robbery and get the judge on trial
Divya Mam. Thank you for covering this issue. Many men are suffering from these issues. Modern day marriages have just turned into legal terrorism. Thank you again for covering this issue. God will give you a lot. Hare Krishna 🙏🙏
Thank you for your kind words and support; it means a lot. Hare Krishna! 🙏
She still isn't asking the critical questions.
@@Marcus_MG42 Bro atleast baat karni to start kiya h warna real life mein no women is talking about it.... Aur gov to thukne to bhi ready nai h mardo pe
We need gender neutral law
+1
भारत में जेंडर न्यूट्रल लॉ कभी नहीं आयेगा क्योंकि यह हिन्दू बहुल देश है हिन्दू पक्षपाती समाज है
We will never get gender neutral law.
Mark my words.
I have been saying so since so many years and now people are waking up. We have to stop paying taxes
We can never forget Atul shubhash as Shahid Atul shubhash........
How can you judge a man accused without any prior inquiry and investigation by the police and lagal system. 98% cases are false against men. But men cont do anything, no legal remedies to save him from false cases accept to fight the cases for 10 years.even After he acquitted he cont file defamation case against women. What laws are they just made to harras men.
I can feel the frustration in your comment. It’s so unfair when innocent people have to spend years proving their innocence. There aren’t enough safeguards to protect men in these situations. This podcast episode was my way of opening up the conversation, and honestly, I’m still learning from everyone’s input.
Thank you for bringing this up-it’s a tough but important issue.
शर्म आती है मुझे देश की ऐसी कानून व्यवस्था पर
Wow intelectually this men lawyer even put blame and made accusation on deseased husband, if in a case women commits suicide his voice totally changed
Gender neutral laws needed in India
अवेयरनेस फैलाओ, बेटे और परिवार बचाओ...😢😢😢😢
We understand that atul ko sucide ni karna chahiye tha but i m literally not satisfied with solanki ji wordings ki dete raho usko paisa zindagi bhar beemari lagti h tab b lagta h paisa
lekin jo aadmi frustrated tha false cases se wo ink jaise lawyers ki vajah se hi hote h q ki ladkiyan aise hi lawyer choose karti hain
50:18 Easy to say. For him, it's a job. For others, it is harassment and mental torture plus financial loss. There are multiple reasons that make India a third world country. Justice system is one of them. He is okay that people lose everything and become a beggar instead of deleting themselves. In the landmark judgment Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India (1978), Supreme Court held that the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 is not limited to mere animal existence but includes the right to live with dignity.
52:57 if there's a genuine case where the husband is deserting the wife or genuinely torturing her (separate matter that it took her 20+ years to make a decision to separate), then wife is definitely entitled to alimony or compensation.. The discussion is entirely related to those scheming and law-abusing women, they don't deserve any alimony
50:34 sir how easy it's to say that paisa hee hai na, monk ban jao etc most of these divorce cases filed against men are false and they make it deliberately ugly because there's huge moolah involved, if not, then no woman would file grave charges like rape etc. "Life is important than money" this is exactly the sentiment they are looking to cash in on
Basic rights like gender equality also we need to beg to implement it and its Still not getting done...
It feels like we’re moving so slow sometimes.
This Motu Lawyer started men vs women. He earns a lot from these cases after all he is an advocate, he will never want this law to be eradicated.
We need a PIL to establish that the gender biased laws are of arbitrary use to violate the constitutional rights of victims. We need a legal person to file this case because a natural person is vulnerable to the exposure of this gender biased laws. If the PIL is rejected then it will be proved that judiciary is a hypocrite.
Pil has many times rejected when it's about men problem.
@ARK2022 The said PIL needs to be rejected to establish hipocracy of apex court, hence, judicial failure
@@priyabratadhar410 yes, but court have no shame. That's why shaming court won't help.
@ARK2022 this PIL should be the last thing before mass disobedience
@@ARK2022 There hasn't been any PIL against all gender biased laws together till now. Rejection will not take more time before mass disobedience.
58:12 Sir, those women in the hinter lands are the real abused ones and the one's that these laws really are made for... But these women cannot afford or dare to hire shrewd and expensive lawyers. They don't avail these laws and continue being oppressed. Mostly the urbane and educated women are availing them is the grave irony
संसद में कोई भी नेता मंत्री पुरुषों के शोषण पर आवाज क्यों नहीं उठाता है
निर्दोष पति के पैसे और औरत ?
31:45 what explains a 12cr alimony ma'am ? That's definitely to be questioned as well!
Solanki sir is the best lawyer... I appreciate him🎉🎉
I remember two decades ago in the UK, when fathers would dress up as spiderman or superheroes & climb highway bridges & block traffic because the mothers would not allow visitation access to the kids. Surreal seeing the same legal apathy & processes occuring in India today, seems like India is 20 years behind the western societal state of affairs. If that be the case can we expect a replication of breakdown of society that we see in the west today being manifested in India 2 decades from now - like high divorce rates, war between the sexes, out of wedlock children, single parent homes, MGTOW ( men going their own way), high crime rate in youth because of fatherlessness? The west is hardly able to handle these issues even with govt assisted support & comparitively low corruption levels. How can India handle the mayhem that is to come which seems inevitable with one-sided & nonsensical laws, political apathy, corruption in every govt dept & half the population that is increasingly feeling wronged, unheard & disconnected. Having lived in the west & India, I conclude that though the family structure is broken in the west, it still functions because of social programmes & govt assistance to broken families & children at risk. If a similar family & societal breakdown occur (which ssems likely from the way people are increasing acting nowadays) India would simply implode. Despite the numerous ills, India still totters along solely because of the family unit, the day families start breaking up is the day we can say goodbye to the notion/nation called India. Atul Subhash's act of desperation is a wake up call to all, esp to those who can see what is in store.
In a few decades, I anticipate a breakdown of Indian society. The problem is not being taken seriously by anyone. The symptom is Atul Subhash. India is being held together by the family structure. However, our naive officials, under the influence of copycat activists who blindly follow the West, are putting imported ideas into action without first putting safety precautions in place. For instance, lawyer Suranya Aiyar, who practices in New Delhi, is opposed to the Western Model of Child Protection that many child rights activists want to be implemented in India. For her work, Suranya Aiyar was awarded by Nordic Committee for Human Rights. Our PM Modi talks about Viksit Bharat by 2047. But on a broken third world system.
57:00 agreed to an extent! Moral or behavioral education is gravely missing in schools these days... Every teacher, every school is just mad behind marks, scores and rankings that they fall miserably in outputting better, less selfish and caring humans..sorry state of affairs 😢
Is tarah se manipulate karoge, to result aayega. Woha aisa lawyer hoga to system ka faida to lega hi.
No hope is left in judiciary now😔
Justice deley to justice denai save mans #mantoo #justiseforatulsubhas jai shree ram 🙏🚩🚩
Have Men's commission in place and every thing will be solved!
Correct bola,From now on wards every men should talk about Mens Empowerment
Men's Commission will never happen even in the next 1000 years.
अतुल सुभाष अमर रहें... 🙏🙏🙏🙏
we need Mens commission ,33 percentage reservation,and n many More rights
Mam wee are facing same scam
Mothers (and mother in-laws or females in-laws) are actually the root cause of all problems, and have been so since the beginning of time in Hindu religion.
झूठ बोल रहे हैं लायर साहब, कि मजबूरी में गलत केसेस डालते हैं, ताकि शादी में खर्च किए हुए 10 करोड़ रुपए वापिस मिले।
10 करोड शादी में खर्च करने वाले इक्का-दुक्का परिवार है।
लायर साहब कह रहे हैं वकील का काम है गलत सलाह देना ताकि पति मजबूर होकर सेटलमेंट करे।
Worse judiciary is biased
Now a days neither any one give nor any one take dorry
False cases of 498a, DV and 125 at its Peak.
Marriage has become a business. Most relationships are materialistic. Stay single stay happy.
Judiciary is horrible for Men in India
Justice is due
We need men commission
मेरे साथ भी ऎसा हो रहा 😢
Even though the edits were helpful but was not comfortable from a viewing point of view, it looks like a compilation video rather than a one single podcast. If required then make small cuts, rest the conversation was good. If required you can make a separate video of combined related podcast as a separate compilation video.
Thanks for the feedback. We appreciate it
A lawyer in another podcast said " ONE WOMAN AWARDED MILLIONS IN ALIMONY AND HUGE AMOUNT OF MAINTENANCE, CREATES 100 SUCH CASES IN FUTURE.
Because she demonstrated to the other greedy women and corrupt system that this is the most lucrative BUSINESS/INDUSTRY and millions can be earned without doing anything at all but just by filling fake cases.
हमारे देश की पार्लियामेंट कब नींद से जागेगी
law for men is needed
Chalo koi charcha to samaj sosail midia me suru hui anyatha to sabse salo se pati purusho ko apradhi maan usko marne ke liye akela asahye chor 🙏🙏 we want. Justice atul subash jai shree ram ji 🙏🚩🚩
80 lkh me settle ho gaya. Wow wht a business.
Atul shubhash ne atmahatya nahi ki hai unhone balidaan diya hai. Ham unhe bhool nahi sakte
Admi ko kamzor banya he baised kanoon ne those who se admi ne galat kiya he aurat ko har taraf se support milta par admi ko nahi. WHY?
39.29 "Some men, instead of thinking and working for the development of the country, are searching Google for "how to avoid giving alimony to wife"" the lawyer in the white shirt and black sweater said this. Remains me the famous dialogue by Munna bhiya from Mirzapur "Abey padhai likhai mein dhyan lagao, ias yas bano, aur desh ko sambhaalo, lekin......"
36:39 ladki akeli nahi uska parivar decide karta hai.... Can a man say this same thing for anything? In marriages that fail which involves girl eloping with a guy betraying her parents , then you sympathise with the girl. In failed marriages that involve the girl betraying her lover and listens to her parents and marries a guy, then you blame the parents and let off the girl... so are you saying girls do not have a decision making capability and therefore absolve them of accountability ? Having said this, there are plenty of those women even today that are not coming under any negative influence or pressure from their parents, friends, lawyers in either setting right their marriage or even a going for a graceful divorce
At 35:23, the guy says if sexual harassment is happening for office promotion then thik hai 😮
Mobile and internet have reached villages now. Women there are also aware of many things.
Divya ma'am mere bhi mann mai reh reh kar Atul ji ki tarah strong feeling aati hai, par mere uper meri mata ji kizimedaari hai, meri shaadi ke 2 month baad padhaai ka bolke ghar gayi, phir mere uper 5 case criminal case kar diye, na maine dowry li.. na maine maara peeta, uske pariwar ki poori zimmedari li.. phir bhi jhoote case akk saal se court ke chakkar kaat raha hoon..police advocate sabne dara dara ke paisa loota...mere bhi mann nai karta jeene kaa.. samajh nai aata maine kiya kya
Democracy require blood and money to function
Both mahila purush strong agar false accusations wrongdoing Allegations hota hai toh women bhi strong emotional hoke baatein karke torture karke bolegi jaise Nisha Nikita Singhania family
It is a Man Vs. Woman issue.
It's not. It's a man vs the elites issue. It's the system, not women. Women are just pawns they use because they know they're the weak link that can be easily manipulated into corruption. Remember, the adam and eve story where the snake approached the woman, not the man. The man will always fall weak to a woman's suggestions because a man is weak only for his woman, nothing else. So once women fall, men will fall, all society falls. Then the elites can easily control the population and reconstruct it in whatever way they want. It's absolute control.
Both judiciary and police is sold out
its super easy to say dont make suicide but every men's mental is not same as other men in the society. Mental strength depends on various factors. 1st we have to get rid of terms like "men will be men", men doest cry, men is super strong and of course those who talks about feminism when the law itself is biased on equality.
35:14 Disagree with a counter example. Woman (small businesswomen) told the man (9 to 5 office worker) to do court marriage to save money. Man agreed. After, one year, man is unable to live with the woman and wanted divorce. She filed false cases against him and his family members and even threatened through police whom she knew. Now want to extort huge sums of money. 36:57 I feel he is justifying bad work ethics of advocates.
Kya bol raha hai ye lawyer? Har ghar me ho rha hai dowry death . Prenupital is not allowed in Indian Hindu Marriage Act.
Ii am the victim of this system, now my brother
सभी लोग कॉमेंट में लाइक करने की जगह वीडियो में लाइक करो तभी विडियो वायरल होगा तो कुछ चास है की लडको को भी न्याय मिले सकता है
Boycott Indian judiciary
Just make divorce easy .
It will solve most of the problems
A lot of problems come because the divorce process us really like the shifty neighbors we have that keep on shaming people pursuing divorce and thus motivates people to nit pick on smallest of ideological differences
Boycott Supreme Court
35:18 sir why girls jaan boojke nahi karti? They are adults and they can always put their conscience ahead and put their foot down and not go with false cases... It's good that many fora including yours, are being so vocal about men's rights, but pls stop giving this 'benefit of doubt' that girls are forced to charge false cases ... It doesn't make sense for adult women, definitely not for even those that are even 12th pass...see this Nikhitha lady, she's resorting to this exact thing claiming lack of knowledge of the cases that she herself has filed... I mean, they are expected to sign the papers, and I think they're also asked by the judge about the clauses and implications of these cases before proceeding... I don't understand why this kids gloves treatment to these women when men's and their families' lives are at stake !!!
Legal crime ha.
Legal Terrorism
Lawyer ji ramayan base hi hai ek pati patni ke kartvya par, sita ji naa hi kabhi alimoney maanga naahi maintenence, ve to apne bacche ko sashakt h kar apne pita ke vamsh ko age badane me bheja hai
Mahilwaadi law ko ye sb pati ka dard nahi dikh raha hai
How many man have to die for the indian judiciary.
India is lady side law this is worst law lady law is Dengarous childrens life spoel 498A firstly cancelled this after no daivers men & women both happy maintenance many property no giving both men & women so there were self working jobs both are happy life
Medam ji 01 01 2025
Apne hi shaher me or 1 software employed susaid
Wow, you or TH-cam deleted my comment 😂 dukhti rag pe haath rakh diya kya? Spoke too much truth?
Sir 12 crore shaadi main kharcha hua tha kya?
Jo thodi bahut Rahat mil sakti hai prusho ko wo bhi nahi milne dete court me moujood judge
Court misuse of law ko encourage karti hai
Misuse of low ke bare me koi kyon nahi kuch karta
Aapki meri kisi ki baat supreme court ya parliament ko nahi fark parta. Chup hai sab. Ye tabhi hoga jam hum janta milke ye system ko band kare jo failure hai.
We want men reforms
Rightly said madam. Atul was murdered by some women and law
Justice is due