So sad that this video has no views and nobody (myself included) had any feedback into proposed changes to matters so very vital. I have subscribed willingly. I wonder if many people that are (or would be if asked on the subject) interested in civil liberties, are effectively stigmatised and frankly, discriminated against - most commonly, as being either, lonely, weird, negative, having an anxiety disorder, or broadly just being mentally ill. It seems it couldn't be possible that very great harm occurs to people via means less easy to understand without meaningful safeguards and provision (legal) in place in society to support grievances from people en masse. I think it is remarkable that at the time of me writing now, it is difficult to say the least to both ascertain what civil liberties exist as safeguards for citizens, and the provision that supports citizens. I think that i will look into your organisation and offer my support in any way i can. I do know that if you cannot obtain legal counsel in London (and i certainly could not this year) for grievances, then it seems probable outside the capital it will be nearly impossible. I think that the most notable organisation with at one point, even a very prominent position in society, was Liberty. The organisation was on the radio and in the media generally, arguing for citizens to be safeguarded from excessive state powers. It is noticeable that both that former actuality and the lack of views on your video has coincided with an extremely well funded and promoted prioritisation of mental health parity to physical health. The harm that has been caused to people during such a transformative phase in our society is untold, and as such it is to my mind an inhumane development that way exceeds any notion of regressive. I can know like millions of others about consumerism promotions and sport and various other daily aspects of life - but not why it is so the state has powers that are disproportionate and obtained by unimity inside parliament and the entire media? The country is not democratic if people are either not offered a genuine opportunity to consider the merits or not of legislative change, or they are unamiously ignored wilfully by parliament. My father died this year in Barnet hospital after circumstances that led up to and including his demise that fully warranted investigating and nothing occured. I myself have endured very horrific treatment and nothing close to support has been afforded to me either. There are others also who have been genuine victim to very inhumane treatment. My father was an incredibly tolerant and decent man - just like me, for all my imperfections. It is clear to me that what i describe is by no means an isolated case - the fact that human rights lawyers are booked up and the press (a poor name for what they do) are silent on the entire issue, supports my sense that a great many people would be genuinely and meaningfully safeguarded and supported by organisations like Liberty and perhaps yours. I think that opportunists have conspired to swipe powers during a time of relatively speaking, political uncertainty and instability, that has seen from Brexit, PM's come and go at a rate almost unparalelled in recent times. You also has the war on terror and a power grab from temporal powers that expanded and become permanent. If you then consider the advances of technology simultaneously it becomes very clear just how impoverished people have become. I deeply resent the idea that people who dare to oppose such circumstances are ill in some way because they don't comply with illegal/legal intrusions into family/personal lives/relationships and jobs and freedoms of varying kind. In the aftermath of processing my fathers demise - a tolerant, hardworking and widely respected man over the years despite his imperfections as a husband and at times as a father, i could not even obtain his ashes in the local crematorium where he was cremated. I think what has happened to me and other people who were banned from even touching their relatives during covid in nursing homes snd hospitals is akin to the addage of the victors write the history of war. The victors are the state authorities and as such, you will get profound distortions about the actual truth of this period - the very same period i happen to have lived through and experienced. This is how past inhuman crimes have been covered up and distorted - by the very same power structures. You tend to find exaggeration from the point of view of the states narrative - and a profound underplaying of the genuine victims who are either wholly umheard or falsely tainted in some way as to amplify the virtiousness of the victors who write the narrative. The final thing i can share with you is that the political left, who are contemptable on civil liberties, are not going to meaningfully safeguard citizens and invoke a guarantee for all citizens to obtain meaningful legal counsel. That was only possible under Jeremy Corbyn - like so much of his proposals the theme was empowering human rights and citizens from structural biases snd harm. Whatever anyone thought of his broader views and agenda - it is all too clear to observe right now, that had he had his proposals implemented the most vulnerable in society and the blue collar masses of the working poor would have been far better off and safer today. That is the sobering fact and millions of people know that - instead it is a guy with half a billion £ serving food at a Christmas voluntrary hub for status of some kind. The insincere rich and puppet PM as opposed to the sincere and prioritising PM of the masses we were all deprived of, it is sickening but it happened.
So sad that this video has no views and nobody (myself included) had any feedback into proposed changes to matters so very vital.
I have subscribed willingly.
I wonder if many people that are (or would be if asked on the subject) interested in civil liberties, are effectively stigmatised and frankly, discriminated against - most commonly, as being either, lonely, weird, negative, having an anxiety disorder, or broadly just being mentally ill.
It seems it couldn't be possible that very great harm occurs to people via means less easy to understand without meaningful safeguards and provision (legal) in place in society to support grievances from people en masse.
I think it is remarkable that at the time of me writing now, it is difficult to say the least to both ascertain what civil liberties exist as safeguards for citizens, and the provision that supports citizens.
I think that i will look into your organisation and offer my support in any way i can.
I do know that if you cannot obtain legal counsel in London (and i certainly could not this year) for grievances, then it seems probable outside the capital it will be nearly impossible.
I think that the most notable organisation with at one point, even a very prominent position in society, was Liberty.
The organisation was on the radio and in the media generally, arguing for citizens to be safeguarded from excessive state powers.
It is noticeable that both that former actuality and the lack of views on your video has coincided with an extremely well funded and promoted prioritisation of mental health parity to physical health.
The harm that has been caused to people during such a transformative phase in our society is untold, and as such it is to my mind an inhumane development that way exceeds any notion of regressive.
I can know like millions of others about consumerism promotions and sport and various other daily aspects of life - but not why it is so the state has powers that are disproportionate and obtained by unimity inside parliament and the entire media?
The country is not democratic if people are either not offered a genuine opportunity to consider the merits or not of legislative change, or they are unamiously ignored wilfully by parliament.
My father died this year in Barnet hospital after circumstances that led up to and including his demise that fully warranted investigating and nothing occured.
I myself have endured very horrific treatment and nothing close to support has been afforded to me either. There are others also who have been genuine victim to very inhumane treatment.
My father was an incredibly tolerant and decent man - just like me, for all my imperfections.
It is clear to me that what i describe is by no means an isolated case - the fact that human rights lawyers are booked up and the press (a poor name for what they do) are silent on the entire issue, supports my sense that a great many people would be genuinely and meaningfully safeguarded and supported by organisations like Liberty and perhaps yours.
I think that opportunists have conspired to swipe powers during a time of relatively speaking, political uncertainty and instability, that has seen from Brexit, PM's come and go at a rate almost unparalelled in recent times.
You also has the war on terror and a power grab from temporal powers that expanded and become permanent.
If you then consider the advances of technology simultaneously it becomes very clear just how impoverished people have become.
I deeply resent the idea that people who dare to oppose such circumstances are ill in some way because they don't comply with illegal/legal intrusions into family/personal lives/relationships and jobs and freedoms of varying kind.
In the aftermath of processing my fathers demise - a tolerant, hardworking and widely respected man over the years despite his imperfections as a husband and at times as a father, i could not even obtain his ashes in the local crematorium where he was cremated.
I think what has happened to me and other people who were banned from even touching their relatives during covid in nursing homes snd hospitals is akin to the addage of the victors write the history of war.
The victors are the state authorities and as such, you will get profound distortions about the actual truth of this period - the very same period i happen to have lived through and experienced.
This is how past inhuman crimes have been covered up and distorted - by the very same power structures.
You tend to find exaggeration from the point of view of the states narrative - and a profound underplaying of the genuine victims who are either wholly umheard or falsely tainted in some way as to amplify the virtiousness of the victors who write the narrative.
The final thing i can share with you is that the political left, who are contemptable on civil liberties, are not going to meaningfully safeguard citizens and invoke a guarantee for all citizens to obtain meaningful legal counsel.
That was only possible under Jeremy Corbyn - like so much of his proposals the theme was empowering human rights and citizens from structural biases snd harm.
Whatever anyone thought of his broader views and agenda - it is all too clear to observe right now, that had he had his proposals implemented the most vulnerable in society and the blue collar masses of the working poor would have been far better off and safer today.
That is the sobering fact and millions of people know that - instead it is a guy with half a billion £ serving food at a Christmas voluntrary hub for status of some kind.
The insincere rich and puppet PM as opposed to the sincere and prioritising PM of the masses we were all deprived of, it is sickening but it happened.
Does this apply only to true blood humans,? Does this apply to all humanoid forms of life, naturally biomedical and humanoid not100% biological.?
They've made the forms very intimidating to your average person