The Plan Was Perfect
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
- If you really enjoy my content, you are more than welcome to support me with a small donation via Paypal.
Link to Paypal donation: www.paypal.me/...
Check out my other channel: / randomchessgames
Xomu - Walpurgis Night
Xomu - Last Dance
Subscribe for more funny chess content, and join my Discord server at:
/ discord
#chess #ChessBut #ifend #ChessImpossible
100 rated chess, but your first check has to be a mate
trying a scholar mate make things easier lol
too easy
Do 500 rated chess for that
@@ninhphamthithuy5098 What’s a scholar mate
@@delayedsantana white plays e4, bc4, qf3, qxf7 mate.
Thats not blundering. Thats sacrificing the exchange
Or blundering the exchange. Still not blundering a full piece tho
@@ellemourto1527 Being up a queen makes a big difference though. If I'm up a queen I don't mind sacking the exchange, trade down is fine.
It’s a blunder of a piece because if king takes back, knight forks the king and queen on e6. And if pawn takes knight, rook takes queen.
@@brickhouse3339 Pawn take E6, no fork there
@@quixmith and then rook takes queen, what's so hard about that?
"g pawn changes gender." one of the best sentences I have ever heard.
Except pawns are eunuchs being traded as a hostage lol
Do we know the pawns are male?
@columbus8myhw We don’t, but it’s still hilarious
@@columbus8myhw Nah, they're all women, since they can become the queen, and therefore the other piece are also all women, and as such chess is just a harem battle. QED
@@CrystalLily1302 You lost me on the jump from "lots of women" to "harem" lol
"This guy really doesn't want my king to be in danger"
Lost it
"G pawn changes gender" is the Most creative way I've ever heard anyone say that a pawn will advance
Thats not a blunder, thats a bad trade
Exactly what I say when I blunder my queen
nice
@@alekhinesgun9997 That's not a blunder, that's the Botez Gambit
It's a blunder because it loses the queen and bishop in 2 turns, after the knight forks the king check, pawn has to take knight, rook takes queen check, king has to move forward, rook takes bishop, knight is pinned. But if he doesn't enter that variation, the video shouldn't end.
At best they blunder an entire took (king shouldnt take back).
If king does take back, that blunders everything (queen and bishop fall, so you get queen + bishop + rook for your bishop and knight).
So yeah no matter what it's a blunder... Either he's down by 5, or he's down by 11 lol.
Due to that, the video should end no matter what.
If the end was going as planned it would have been legendary. Maybe next time
I love the way the bot says nevermind. He just sounds so disappointed
Technically, while the rook over was a blunder, it wasn't blundering a piece. It was an offer to exchange a bishop for a rook, which is different from blundering a piece.
So....it maybe shouldn't count as ending the video.
it's a blunder.
the rook costs more points than the bishop
@@yogeshsaluja7008 Not a blunder- a sacrifice to avoid checkmate
@@-minushyphen1two379 cause 100 rated player would understand that 😂
@@yogeshsaluja7008 See, but a blunder is different from blundering a piece. One can blunder and lose a piece without blundering a piece if it's a trade or gives positional advantage.
So yes, it's a blunder. But it's probably not blundering a piece. It's just a really terrible trade, for a lot of reasons.
@@donalddickerson206 a 100 rated trade.
he blundered an exchange , not a piece
Chess, but your king wants to marry the opponent's queen (every time your opponent moves their queen, you must move your king closer to their queen).
There was a similar hallege where whenever the opponents queen moves, the king moved in the same direction
he made your video
this makes me sad LMAO. anyways that was hilarious Nxf2 XD
The "what the f..." endings are always the best^^
Actually I'm pretty sure according to stock fish, it's a mistake to trade Rook for bishop/knight not a blunder.
Except this is a free rook...
Unless you want to try to take back and then lose an extra queen for free
"this guy really doesn't want my king to be in danger."
It's not a Blunder according to Stockfish
100 rated chess, where the match must end with your opponent stalemating you.
Chess, but you play bad, to play good. If you make a "good", "excellent", "best move", or "brilliant", the next move must be an "inaccuracy", "mistake", "blunder", or "missed win" respectively.
Impossible. He needs to analyze the game real-time to make that, and that's cheating.
@@gonzalotapia1250 Another person could do it and just tell the classification of the move.
@@gonzalotapia1250 what do you mean? He's already made a lot of videos like this. He just needs to play a full game and analyse it afterwards, finishing the video whenever the rule is violated.
"g pawn changes gender" LMAO
I’ll never get tired of the joke “oh look he’s playing a book opener, better watch out for…oh never mind it’s a 100 rated player they’ve never looked up an opener”
The "what the f-" at the end NEVER gets old
100 rated chess, but your opponent knows the challenge
didn't think the challenge's conditions applied after the queen was taken.
"Whaou this guy really doesnt want my king in danger" Maybe he's a double agent 😂
Interesting discussions on this video. While some have said the rook move that ends the video isn't a blunder of the rook but a sacrifice for an exchange, others have pointed out that following through on that exchange exposes a variation in which White takes Black's queen and maybe takes even more. Of course, Simp established early in the video that he can protect the video by declining to enter advantageous variations, so maybe the exchange of rook for bishop could have been considered fine and continued the challenge.
g-pawn changes gender is probably the best i've ever heard.
"Jalalalad variation" has me ROLLING
The final move was hilarious
3:37 G-pawn changes gender oh fucking yes
not a blunder he’s tactically sacrificing the rook to get rid of the active bishop
I for one am astonished that the game went that long without your opponent using the Queen even once.
2:13 here's a tip for future videos: 100 rated players always think that sacrificing a knight to permanently keep your king in the center is a good idea. Always castle if you can when your 100 rated opponent does this if it affects the video
yes i dont get why he didnt castled even after seeing the possibility?
But he didn't blunder a piece. He blundered the exchange.
Chess, but your pawns have to be symmetrical
Its like he knew what you were doing
Chess, but pawns may only capture pieces and pieces may only capture pawns.
Chess, but every time you capture an opponent's piece, you add a rule to make the challenge harder
Chess but you can only capture if it's your only move.
100 rated chess but you cant move any pieces until all your pawns have been taken.
Bishop f8 to a3 is aligned to the crack of my device
3:39 G pawn changes gender
Petition to call promoting a pawn, “pawn changes gender” from now on.
wasn't a blunder, opponent was sacking the exchange. Honestly a perfectly good trade for your opponent when they are up so much material
Chess, but you can only move 8 out of the 16 pieces and pawns.
"This is going to be short" Proceeds to be 4 minutes
Should have just called it an exchange sacrifice
Chess, but if not any check happen every 4 moves, the video ends
Too difficult? Make it 5
Ah yes the good ol days of the jalalabad opening memes
You have to always go for the check if it possible!
You should have used stock fish to see if it's a blunder ...it's just an exchange sac
He can't use stockfish while playing though. He wouldn't know when he is supposed to blunder his queen.
the last one wasn't a full piece, just a rook for a bishop, probably fine.
Especially being up a queen, you want to trade down, even sacking the exchange is completely fine in most cases. Maybe an inaccuracy or a mistake at most, definitely not a blunder.
Well, after Bxf8 Kxf8, Ne6+ forks the queen and king
@@shng8528 but that doesn't blunder a piece immediately, so probably fine. Because the same way the rook was hanging at start of the game, but he didn't enter the variation.
@@shng8528 there's still a pawn and bishop defending e6 though
@@justinbombach9873 If black pawn takes forking knight, rook takes queen. An even worse blunder.
There was no need to end the video just because your queen is gone
Chess, but if your opponent blunders you lose
Top 10 anime endings that made men cry
It wasn't a piece blunder, it was an exchange sacrifice to stop your checkmate threat which he saw!
0:44
this is just going completely over my head
blundering an exchange isn't blundering a full piece
Chess, but only like can capture like. So only pawns can take pawns, rooks take rooks, etc.
"g pawn changes gender"
i mean, it's not wrong
You should've castled when the knight forked you
g pawn changes gender, lol
Chess but your pieces can only move within 3x3 square.
He only blundered an EXCHANGE it's not a piece
Your what the f… in the ends are hilarious xD
It wasn't a blunder, he was freeing his king from black bishop
100 rated chess, but you can only take one piece (not pawn) for every pawn you've lost.
Wayy too easy
The last move was a defense to prevent mate, not a blunder
Ah yes the jalalabad variation
Chess, but none of your pieces or pawns may ever occupy the center 4 squares.
Very aggressive.
2:25 I think castling is the best way to blunder the queen there
Chess, but you can't move a piece until your opponent moves the same piece type (if white, a turn 1 pawn move is allowed).
Honestly a rook for bishop trade when he's leading for a whole queen wasn't a blunder.
"changes gender"
Gendered pawn
Gendered pawn
the plan wasnt perfect anyways, clearly he was going to underpromote into a knight
The end was actually blundering an exchange, so technically perfectly legal for the challenge
Except that after Bxf8 Kxf8, Ne6 forks the king and queen, and if black takes dxe6, then Rxd8 and after the king moves even Rxc8. (Obviously if not dxe6 then just Nxd8.) So black can't take the bishop back, thus it was a blundered rook.
Chess Simp almost was caught in the Jalalalabad Variation that the opponet was training in his preparations
Watching 100 rated players play just hurts my brain and my soul
Chess, but you can only capture with queen
And it’s only you, not your opponent too
He sacrificed his rook for bishop
And then lost the queen
At 3:51 think your opponent is thinking Kg3, Qg5+, Kxh3 and Rh8#.
Chess but you have to make your opponent subscribe to you to win.
Actually blundering is when you lose a piece for nothing.
A number of observations for this one..... you did not walk into this one nearly prepared and severely underestimated the difficulty of this one. What you needed to do, before doing anything else, was set up a position with your queen so that you could blunder it on command, but only in a way that someone who was actually good would be able to exploit, so that you could move your queen into "danger" and have it continually survive each time. You really failed the challenge as soon as he blunders a rook at 0:42 for the knight but you refused to go through with it. And also, the final move, at that point he's so many points ahead, I am not sure you can actually call that a blunder since it would be exchanging his rook for your bishop. He's up a queen against a piece at that point, so trading a rook for a piece at that point isn't a blunder, it's at worst a "mistake" if not an "inaccuracy". In my opinion at least, I don't know about the stockfish analyzer. But if you kept going after not blundering your queen after 0:42, you should have kept going after being offered a rook for a bishop, that may have even been deliberate in which case it definitely wasn't a blunder.
Yeah if you didn't end the video at 0:42 for your refusal to take the initiative when he blundered his rook for a knight, then you definitely shouldn't have done it when the other person basically did the same thing but while he was up a queen. They are the exact same level of exchange, it's certainly not more of a blunder when he does it while up a queen.
Also at 3:28 by moving the pawn forward, he also blundered in a way you didn't exploit, because if you had responded to it with bishop C4-D5 you would have gotten his rook so that was an unseen blunder. Really, the moment you lose your queen early in the game you have already lost the challenge, you need to set up the configuration where you blunder your queen but only if he sees it and only someone good would see it.
I enjoy your analysis, but also enjoyed the video & generally choose not to take it too seriously as he often performs the challenge slightly less than perfectly.
Best description of gxh1=Q ever 😆
100 rated chess, but u cannot take any pieces
2:05 "d takes e5" but it's actually fxe5
Chess, but only good moves are allowed or worse. Exception are book moves or captures.
In another comment thread started by Sri Nugroho Prahastono, Brickhouse333 explained that this rook move offers the exchange (bishop-takes-rook-f8, king-takes-bishop-f8) but that leads to a variation in which Black's queen and, likely, other pieces, are lost.
After the king takes the bishop in exchange, White can then play knight-e6 forking Black's queen and king. Black has a pawn there but taking the knight would expose the queen to capture by White's rook which simultaneously checks Black's king and then earns a free bishop. Instead of responding to the fork by taking knight with pawn, then, Black might be better off moving the king back to e8, losing the queen to the knight, and taking the knight with the king, but that puts white up a lot of material, too. Of course, White could decline to move his knight into the fork to save the video, but I'm still curious to explore this.
Instead of taking back with the king, Black could respond to bishop-takes-rook-f8 with something like queen-h4-check but that doesn't seem to lead anywhere productive for Black, either.
What does White play if, instead of taking the exchange, Black responds to bishop-takes-rook-f8 with queen-b6, pinning the knight? I'm thinking maybe White plays bishop-takes-pawn-g7, Black develops knight-c6 forking White's knight and pawn, then, I don't know what from White? If taking the pawn is a bad response to queen-b6, what is White's best line of play?
Chess, but your direction is random between North, south, east and west. (Day 11)
Knight, Bishop and other diagonal move also count as 2 direction
That was a good challenge.
HEY. That was not a blunder! Just normal Rook - Bishop TRADE. Very nice 100 rated tactics!!!
Everybody just ignore the "Jalalalad variation"?
NEVER MIND!! "Extremely FUNNY!!!
Last move wasnt a blunder, just a strategic trade
It's not a blunder if the opponent doesn't know which piece is the strongest. So if you exchange bishop for rook it's still good xD
It's not a blunder, it might be one of the good moves as it atleast stops the knight to reach the king
Wait, so after explaining that it isn't blundering a piece if White doesn't take advantage of it, Black moves a pawn en prise and Simp declares he blundered it before he captures it...
100 rated chess, but you can only capture like to like. (Only cap bishops with bishops, knights with knights, etc. Check/mate is not a cap)