That's kind of you to say, Neil, but I'm pretty sure the worst thing Fender or Gibson ever did was let me buy and play their guitars. The huge hit that their marketing and prestige take from anyone seeing me play probably necessitates a special line entry in the loss section of their tax return. They may have on-staff psychologists to help master builders deal with the fact that such beauty can be so abused. It probably isn't random that my Google searches almost never show me the guitar I am looking for since the two companies have invested millions in a complex algorithm that attempts to keep me from buying guitars. But I love them nonetheless.
the top load has more wheat like overtones with hints of mint and Disney, where as the brash string thru is displaying more Florida OJ all day with subtle traces of Snoop Dogg. nuff said. Very fine playing.
It’s Unlike guitarists to be arguing over some minute detail that has next to no effect on the instrument, instead of just spending that time and effort practicing more. We are a weird bunch to be fair ha
In my experience with the Jimmy Page Telecaster in particular, the top loading bridge is more prone to a type of buzz caused by inadequate pressure on the saddle. If the action is set fairly high (like Joe likes), the tonal differences are almost non-existent, but if it's set low (like most guys buying a $5,000 guitar want), it can't get enough pressure on the saddle and resonates oddly. Both of the Jimmy Page Telecasters I've set up came with the strings top loaded, and the customer requested that I put them through the body instead both times.
I've been playing for less than 2 months and I've already noticed this about the guitar community haha. I've made a promise to myself to not get sucked into that attitude.
@@peterklein5861 it’s built on a mentality of “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it”, and the mysterious properties of wood. I can guarantee you won’t be able to escape all of it
@@peterklein5861 Pete I can tell you for sure, you first getting into this all, you will experiment and that’s all fun and good. Most importantly, is that you have fun doing it. If it sounds great to you don’t change a damn thing. If it doesn’t there are plenty of options. Most players can’t hear the difference but with a good pair of headphones you can. If Fender cranked out a bunch of Tele’s they will all sound slightly different. The easy thing to do? Pick one up and play it, you will know then and there if she is coming home with you.
I've been dodging buying one for years now. Evéry time I buy a Guitar I think....I should replace my old Tele...but for the money, look at all the other shiney , flashy stuff on the market! 6 times I've gone to buy a new guitar, and I always come back with something different. I just did it again with a Charvel (sue me!). I lost my trusty Black US Tele to a Pawnshop 20 yrs ago. And I quit playing guitar entirely over it, for over 15 years. I gotta get me a piano black U.S. Tele again. My soul needs it.
Forget Hendrix, Clapton, Knopfler, Gilmore, etc. Here's Chris Buck! Great playing again, every time I watch and hear you play I get inspired and grab for my guitar, only to find out that I'm not there yet.
my mom had a top loader, then they came out with the front loaders but they get mold build up on the door seal, what we arnt talking about washing machines. sorry wrong video
Craig Crider:::::::::::::::::::::::::::"The worst thing Fender ever did to a Telecaster?" When Fender sold to CBS.. Freaking 10 pound boat anchor 70's guitars. Maple necks dipped in polyurethane. Micro tilt neck adjuster.
His title got me here too lol. I’m like what the hell is the worst thing Tele has done? For me is that I’m not okay with just having one. That’s why I ordered another and I know I’m not just okay with that either lol.
Mayer is a great compositor. And i think that it is harder to compose really great songs that will touch many thousands than great solos. Chris is fantastic here with his riffs but let hear that an full albums, that’s an other game.
@@clust11 Ofcourse, that's another topic. I value Mayer for his composer work. I just like to listen Chris more when I'm in the mood for some bluesy stuff :)
I can hear a tad bit more top end with the top load. I even tried it double-blind. But it could literally be that you played it just ever so slightly different in each take. Certainly not even enough for it to be of worry for any gig or recording. When I say tad, I mean only just enough to say it is there. I have played both side by side before and for feel, I can't say it is appreciable either. Sure, maybe ever so slightly different, but it could just be because they were different guitars. I think it is really nothing to bother over, and that the only real reason to choose one over the other is for the economy.
I agree. On the single note lead guitar stuff just a little less low end, very subtle and not a big issue as far as having one or the other. They’re both great!
Frankly I couldn't hear any difference. Now I must admit that I have that more often with TH-cam comparisons. Even if I know from live comparison that there actually is a difference. The compression on TH-cam compromises the audio that much. I have a collection of 94 guitars amount then write a few telecasters (brilliant guitars), 3 top loaders and 10 string troughs. I really can't hear a difference even if I change strings and switch to string through on the same guitar.
Agreed. I also thought the string-through was louder near the attack and the top-load kept more volume later into the sustain. It's a tiny difference between two great sounds and the greatness of the sound comes from the player, not the string loading.
Goddamn the intro was roaring and explosive in playing and tone. Sounds like Derek trucks and you're not even playing with a slide. HOW U DO THAT ON A TELE!!!????
The string thru is warmer more prominently on the upper strings. There's a slight bit of brighter ping on the top loaded. But you really have to pay attention to notice the difference. I wonder if you notice more difference if played on dimed Plexi and doing pinch harmonics. Like a VH - ZZ hybrid version. :P
Yeah, I thought the top loader was a bit brighter. But not enough to matter very much. My objection to the top loader is more along the lines of it not being as tidy? I like those unsightly string ends tucked away. My tele has those slotted tuning pegs, so everything's nice and cozy, all tucked in. This is obviously completely silly and unnecessary, but dammit, I like it.
I expect that if Leo had made the first Teles as toploaders, we'd consider string-thru inferior. I have a 1996 Mexican Tele that was originally a toploader, and I converted it to string-thru. I also swapped the bridge for a brass Gotoh one at the same time, so it's not possible to compare the stringing change.
I've got the Mirror Tele and it's absolutely PHENOMENAL! I keep it top loaded because that's how Jimmy Page done it. I also have a standard Tele as well that I also love. Tele's are awesome.
Think of guitars as structural recipes, where various differences are on one hand obviously true/‘real’ (design, construction, materials, etc) & on the other, pretty damned subjective (can you feel/hear/tell the diff?)...
@Augustus Ceasar Bro, I just said what I heard, I probably would get it wrong but I feel that there is a difference, I like the top loader's tone more, and I have the right to say so.
Yep, I felt the same. Crisper sound with the top loader on all the clips. Then again, there's probably no group of people more guilty of tricking themselves into hearing ghosts and unicorns than us guitarists, so who knows? Could be something else causing the difference (if there is one) too.
I thought the top loaded sounded a tad brighter. Either way it sounds great, especially when played by Chris Buck! I love Teles, got 5 of em (different makes and models, only 1 a Fender) and they each have their own sound.
Not many guitar players can surprise me with every new piece, you're just doing that on a weekly basis with every note coming out of your brain and fingers, I am in complete awe of your playing, tone and in the feeling you put into your every licks. Fresh and explosive. Keep them coming.
Maybe it's just me, but top loaded sounds a little bit brighter, on this video anyway. I think it may have sounded better top loaded. Hard to discern though.
Ok ok guys I swear I can tell a difference. It’s so irrelevant but it is there. I put the audio into an EQ display and the Q of the peak low mids shifts from about 450Hz on string thru to 600Hz on the toploader consistently. This makes sense as the string though is resonating the wood a little more. By that logic, the GE smith Telecaster’s thicker tone on the bridge pickup could be attributed to the fact that the pickup is mounted directly into the body instead of suspended by the bridge plate; once again bringing the resonance of the body into play a little bit more. Doesn’t really matter, but the difference is there.
The top-load sounds a bit clearer through the range, while the string-thru sounds a bit mushy in the low end. Maybe I'm imagining it - I can't play guitar with my fingers, so I learned the bass.
Having cobbled together a few guitars from scratch, I can tell you the string break angle on a string through vs. top load makes a difference on bridge tension, so from my perspective, top loader is easier on equipment.
Of course, practicing is how we get better, BUT, what Chris has and can do has nothing whatsoever to do with mere practice. I'm certain that I could practice 24 hours a day, every day, and never be able to play as well as Chris. Sure, he must practice as well as the rest of us but that's where "the rest of us" gets left in the dust. Unlike virtually all of "the rest of us", Chris is a remarkably talented musician. So what does that mean? Well, it means many things but most of all that his musical imagination is what it is which, in my opinion, is that of simply one of the finest, most melodic, and powerful guitar players I have ever heard. That's all. As for top or body through string-loading, just play your guitar and forget all of that nonsense.
I suck as a guitar player, but man am I passionate about guitars and the music, and these episodes of yours, Mr. Buck, are absolute gold. Please, do carry on for a long time doing these, because - besides playing the instrument - you have a talent in telling its stories. Bravo.
Fucking hilarious. Despite the fact there's literally no difference you're all in here claiming otherwise. I suspect you all think rosewood fretboards sound "warmer" too, right? What a joke.
I find it's all a matter of personal taste. I once had a Telecaster with a Bigsby. It just didn't sound right to me, but to my friend, it was great. To each his own.
I am on your side. Bigsby kills sustain. The strings should be as straight as possible, which is the premise. Then, smaller break angle, greater sustain.
@@134SASAKI The worst Bigsby offense to me is when someone puts one on a perfectly functioning 335. I also don't like to see one on a Tele either though.
As you say to each his own - I built a tele and it came out as a bit of a dud, no sustain, no bite, just dull uninspiring thuds. I then put a Bigsby on it (with the same ashtray bridge) and it came alive, it’s my main guitar now
Dude. You sound phenomenal. Tell me you're like, Mick Taylor's son or something. I'm hoping someone with your skill would be touring with someone. But then, with covid and all. Your technique is sick. I think of myself as good, but I'm not in your league. Not with that technique.
I could watch Chris Buck playing for hours with nothing other than the right hand closeups. Just insanely talented. The sheer number of hours he must've put into his craft to become the player he is is nearly unfathomable.
"The sheer number of hours he must've put into his craft to become the player he is is nearly unfathomable." You're a hysteric. Just talk normal. "He must have put in a lot of hours."
@@Frip36 Considering you lack a grasp of basic grammar, I'm not sure you're setting yourself up for success in reprimanding others for the manner in which they communicate. But, sure, have at it, dummy.
There is a difference clearly audible in the bass/low-mids. The strung through body is much more present in the lows and the chordal overtones hold together longer, the top loaded string set just doesn't have as much resonance. In a mix with a full group, I might prefer the top loaded set as who really cares when the bass will be stepping all over that region anyway and too much of that just makes everything sound boomy. But, in a setting where the full register of the guitar would be on display (or the bassist sucks) the top loaded setup would annoy me, through body all the way in that case.
I use string through on bottom 3 and top 3 are top loaded, that way power chords are just a little thicker and the strings are more responsive, and the top 3 are a little slinkier. The tone difference is negligible when you can dial tone on your rig to compensate. It's all personal preference
@@superbroadcaster Good idea. It comes down to what keeps your head and more importantly your ear in the game. Bum notes, that no one else may notice, can really be distracting to you in the moment and throw you off an otherwise great performance. Do what you need to do to be comfy.
It's a psychological thing for me. KNOWING that the strings pass through the body and that the bridge is consequently being pressed against the wood rather than pulled away from it makes me feel more confident and hear a tighter sound. Like a lot of other issues, most people probably can't tell the difference in a blindfold test; I'd certainly be one of those people.
Same, there's something about the way I know it's pushing that bridge down and not trying to yank it out of the body that inspires some sort of weird confidence. Then I play and think "you should probably fuck off about the bridge and get better."
@@davidjohnston4240 I don't think I've ever had a string break on my Tele; nothing I can recall anyway, The strings eventually go dead and then I replace them. I'd also suggest that it's not that sharp a bend. I'd not have thought the cross-sectional diameter of the bridge saddles was significantly different from that of the machine head posts.
@@davidjohnston4240 Sorry about this, but although that last reply was written in total sincerity, I've just realised (it was two years ago I wrote the first comment to be fair) that when I wrote the comment you responded to, I wasn't really thinking about my Tele, but about my bass which I bought about ten years ago. it was a cheap (but good-quality neck and body-wise) P-bass copy and I customised it heavily, replacing all sub-standard parts including the bridge which was ultra flimsy and had top loading. I got a nice chunky through-body job and some string retainers and I'm happier with that. As for my Tele, I customised it about seven years after I bought it and put on a bridge unit of my own design which has a Tele-style pickup mount hinged onto a Strat-type bridge with a tremolo block underneath (THAT might fill Chris Buck with horror perhaps?). This brings up the issue that all Strats have the same bend at the bridge which you were alluding to. The most extreme angle that either through-body Teles or standard Strats put the string through, is about 45 degrees but is indeed a sharp bend. If players who break strings experience most of the breaks around this point, I'd not be surprised.
@@Maltloaflegrande I was offering a handy mental trick to adapt to a top loader. Not a fact based analysis. My real thoughts are this: My beef with the top loader and similar on many hardtail bridges (especially Fender's) is that the ball end is way too close to the bridge leading to the wrapped end sometimes reaching the bridge and not having enough adjustment range to intonate thicker strings. Just make the bridge a few mm longer, moving the ball end of the string back and you solve both problems. I've built a couple of partscasters with the schaller hardtail bridge with the string spacing adjustment. That does give more room. You could put 13s on that sucker and not run out of intonation range on the low E string.
As a little experiment....think I'll see if my original 59 les paul would sound better a string through.gotta be accurate with the drill though ain't I don't want to ruin it.
Awesome playing at the top of the video. I like the top load. Just don't like the holes all the way through the body. I used to love the idea until I got two dean string through bodies and a 12 string tele that is half and half. They sound more tinny and strat like probably in my head but I was expecting the opposite..so there ya go.
I've played guitar for over 55+ years, and every acoustic, Gibson electric, PRS electric and every Fender bass I've owned has been a top-loader. I have used Fender electric guitars with both through-body and top-load.....even one particular Telecaster has had both.....and I can testify there is SO LITTLE difference that I simply don't trust anyone who claims there is any. The top-loaders SOUND the same, they FEEL the same, they SUSTAIN the same, etc. All too often, we guitarists choose guitars and form opinions with our EYES.....and not our ears and hands. Unless you are Eric Johnson, and can "hear" the difference in battery brands in pedals (as he claims) I defy you to tell any difference in Telecasters (or even hard-tail Strats) with top-loading bridges vs. string-through. (with all respect) PS.....nice playing, youngster!
Top loading unwound G string and routing the other 5 strings thru the body creates a more balanced overtone series on open chord above the 5th fret voicings in double dropped D tuning when using the bridge pickup with the tone rolled off to 7. But only when intonated compromised or just tuning at 436Hz, but not equal temperment with wound G string.
The top loaded tele is noticeably brighter to my ears...Im surprised to hear you couldn’t hear the difference in the room Chris, perhaps the video/TH-cam boosts certain frequencies making it more obvious ?
If he did not tell you which was which, you would not even know...if he played the piece twice with string through you would be rambling about the slight difference etc of the one you thought was toploaded. They should do a blind test and see how many of you look like fools
Thanks Chris for this flashback and analysis. Personally I prefer the strung through version (which I also own) but at the end of the day it depends on the player. You and your guitar always looks to me like a unit. I very much love the outro of your video, hot stuff as always. Cheers
Here's all the things I like about the Telecaster. 1. It's a slab and a plank, screwed together, simple rugged; a man's guitar. 2. You have a Tele, you're part of the club, welcome in any genre. 3. The body edges aren't rounded off too much. 4. A delicate, elegant head with little things to hold down the strings. 5. The controls in a simple plate that looks like it was positioned to intentionally break up the line of the scratch plate. 6. The scratch plate accurately follows the line of the body. 7. The strap huttons are sensibly positioned. 8. On the 72 the name TELECASTER is picked out in bold black capitals on the head. 9. The thinline is hollow. 10. The thinline has an elegant F hole. 11. There's a nifty B bender. 12. The deluxe and shawbucker have matching pickups. 13. That swamp ash has an open grain that you can feel with your fingers. 14. The thinline comes with elegant body piping on the edges. 15. Skunk strip.
At first I thought there was no noticeable difference, then in the Hendrix clip I thought top-loaded was slightly brighter, but my main thought was if the playing made more difference than the setup. That being said, Aaron from Warmoth did a nice shootout essentially showing that when you aim to play the same track the same way even on different days, the difference is so slight if perceivable, that any change in gear/setup is more likely to be a bigger factor. So I suppose that either it was psychological or top-loaded might've been just ever so slightly brighter. If I had to theorize why it would be, the strings through body might introduce more interaction with the body and let the lower frequencies come out as more balanced spectrum. Just like brass nut seems to be brighter. Sounds believable, but wouldn't put my money on the observation or the theory. At the end of the day the difference, if it is there, is so slight that it's better to just get a good sound, play and forget it. Would probably opt for the top-loader just for the gigging purposes, seems faster to restring.
And about the brass nut one would think it would only make a difference on the open string, wouldn’t it, because once you’ve fretted it would seem to be out of the picture. Well there must be people that have hearing approximating a jack rabbits’, As I’ve heard a few people say there is a difference
Chris has the busiest fingers in the business. He plays 80% more notes than Dave Gilmour, uses tons of finger vibrato, he slides up and down to notes effortlessly and hybrid picks between fingers and a pick. Fascinating to watch!
My lord it took 2 years to see this guy, and a science nerd and then he has more notes than Gilmour? Maybe true, but Gilmours notes are the ones that are at every record shop, made him a multi millionaire, but mainly the top 5 most talented and innovative guitar player, but even more a pure artist. Nerd
@@alexhighfield1891 Sorry, I can't remember the exact JB interview. I have watched (and read) an awful lot of them. It is probably here on TH-cam somewhere. Unless it was a print source. If I remember correctly he didn't say why he hated it, just that it sounded terrible, to him, compared to the one he kept.
I found one source, but TH-cam wouldn't let me post the link. If you google something like, "Jeff Beck on giving Jimmy Page the Stairway tele" it is out there. I found it on Reverb dot com.
I can't hear the difference & frankly, it doesn't matter anyway. The only thing that counts is a guitarist's ability. A great guitarist could be playing the cheapest Korean Tele ever made & the sound he produces will be sought after by every guitar aficionado out there. All of a sudden, that particular sound becomes the only one everybody wants.
Well, I once saw an interview with Billy Gibbons where he asserted that he wrapped strings over the top of the stop bar on his LP because it made string bending easier. GIven that he's palyed more years than most of us have been alive, I'll take his word for it. Same idea - less resting string tension.
How do strings the have so little mass, compared to a solid plank of wood, have any effect on the sustain and resonance of a solid body guitar? Answer .... they don't.
The older you are, the better the tone & sustain. Your bones are pretty hollow at that age & your fingers resonate well on the fretboard. *In theory* 😆
People forget that listening is an interpretive act. Not only is the physical structure of each person's ear different, the brain that analyzes the signal and makes sense of it is different in each case. More of what we hear comes from our own perceptive apparatus than we want to realize. We all want to think we are hearing things exactly as they are, so we can say others are hearing it incorrectly, but everyone is hearing their own interpretation of the original stimulus. The endless debates about some of these minutiae are absurd. I hear Laurel.... you?
Top Loader Bridge was amazing , I used to have a Squier 20th Anniversary Telecaster which was all Black with a Maple neck looked like something Gilmour would play and the Strings being strung through the bridge instead of through the body sounds better in my opinion , more sustain , more power as it increases bass and gets rid of that nasty treble sound , This is why Page loved it , it made it like a mini Les Paul .
I actually had an idea the other day to take a string through tele and drill some holes to accommodate asn extra set of strings to turn it into a 12 string.
That will work or Gotoh makes (made?) a 12 string fully intonated Tele bridge. The second course of tuners can be added to the side of a standard headstock at 90 degrees with the strings passing through the face of the headstock. There are good photos on the Telecaster forums. Alternately a set of Steinberger tuners will also work at a bit more expense.
@@J00PIE I believe at one point in the 70s fender made a 12 string jaguar style guitar so I'd try track down one of them and put that headstock on. Edit: turns out their was also a run of 12 string strats.
I first noticed you in Paul David's Improv Collab. Fell in love with that solo. You're now an addition on my list with guitarists with what I consider to be unique styles: Tim Henson, David Gilmour, Ichika Nito, Charlie Robbins, Manuel Gardner Fernandes, Marcin Patrzalek and David Maxim Micic.
Chris, can you tell us what's going on in your signal chain in the opening salvo? How are you getting that "amp melting down" tone? I think I've got the first part straight. We happen to use the same picks. :)
I tested a top loaded Tele I have and after I drilled through the body and restringed it. The top loaded way was easyer to bend. You are 100% right Chris Buck. Dont ever be afraid to tell the truth about the truth.
Completely agree! I thought the bass/low mids jumped out more. I wonder what the combo of bass strings top-loaded and treble strings string-through (or vice-versa) would sound like.
Man it's such a shame there isn't really a place for rock music in top 40 anymore. This guy legit could've been the next big ICON. He's got his own style and could play circles around anyone out there. Super talented guy. Hope he sells out an arena one day - he deserves it
“...Leo Fender, being famously thrifty...” You mean the Leo Fender who snipped “Broadcaster” from the headstock decals, using them with only the “Fender” brand name instead of spending the money on printing new ones with “Telecaster,” thus, creating the relatively short-lived “Nocaster.” *THAT* Leo Fender?? 😂😂😂
He wasn't "sued" by Gretsch, there wasn't even a cease and desist letter. Gretsch sent him a telegram politely asking him to stop using the name, complete with a "please" and "thank you", so he did. It was the early 50s- frivolous lawsuits weren't a thing yet, lol.
@@michaelwoods9005 you’re absolutely correct, thanks. I was really speaking toward Leo Fender’s reputation for being “thrifty,” though. I’ll just edit out the part about the lawsuit that never happened so that it doesn’t perpetuate that false rumor. Again, thanks.
The leo fender thatcinvented the finest amps gits ever and probobly had a problem with a snob who thought he stole the name.chopped it off never used it again.too busy making history.
Downright filth!!!😆 Exceptional playing as always Chris... gonna keep trying to nail your 'easier' licks before arthritis gets the better of me fingers 😁
There is slightly less body in the sound on the top-loaded one. The sound and the feel seems a little lighter. But the differense is quite subtle. Like always, the sound remains in the fingers.
Hey Chris I love my weekly fix of Friday Fretworks! How about doing an episode on the original Yamaha SG series of guitars from the 1970s! They were very well made guitars and very well respected and also still receive a lot of attentio, even now when they are no longer in production. Keep up the good work Chris!
I’m wondering how, when the pitch is determined by the length and tension of the vibrating part of the string, top loading vs through-body changes how it feels or sounds. My big takeaway, not being a DIY Isaac Newton (lol!), is that whatever Chris Buck plays, it sounds like Chris Buck. Which, by the way, is bloody marvellous!!
I go through the body on the wound strings and top load the unwound. This keeps everyone happy by making them think I know something they don't.
lol
🤣
Yeah but have you tried half and half . . !!??
@@walthompson8210 is that bi?
clever since you can't unless you drilled the getar
The worst thing Fender ever did with a Telecaster was let me play one...
hahahahaha, I wanna love um and I buy a lot of them and continue to play my strat. Oh well
😂
Nice
LMAO
That's kind of you to say, Neil, but I'm pretty sure the worst thing Fender or Gibson ever did was let me buy and play their guitars. The huge hit that their marketing and prestige take from anyone seeing me play probably necessitates a special line entry in the loss section of their tax return. They may have on-staff psychologists to help master builders deal with the fact that such beauty can be so abused. It probably isn't random that my Google searches almost never show me the guitar I am looking for since the two companies have invested millions in a complex algorithm that attempts to keep me from buying guitars. But I love them nonetheless.
Thank goodness that's settled so we can get back to important issues: does a Les Paul sound better with the pick guard on or off?
Bladder Splattle Off.... No doubt about it. 330... Pick guard off. 335... Pick guard on. 🤗
It won't matter after the headstock breaks off
Depends on who's playing it.
@@TJEvans98 Same goes for the SG
😂😂😂😂😂
the top load has more wheat like overtones with hints of mint and Disney, where as the brash string thru is displaying more Florida OJ all day with subtle traces of Snoop Dogg. nuff said. Very fine playing.
how kooky..
On my les paul I prefer the top load
I wish I could coconut this comment twice.
I've never replied to a TH-cam comment in my life... but, you sir, got an audible guffaw from me with this comment. Well played sir... well played.
How dare you. Also what you meen?
It’s Unlike guitarists to be arguing over some minute detail that has next to no effect on the instrument, instead of just spending that time and effort practicing more. We are a weird bunch to be fair ha
It changes the “feel” of the guitar...
It changes how it resonates..
Isn’t that the reason most fall in love with the guitar?
But the “toneeeee!”
In my experience with the Jimmy Page Telecaster in particular, the top loading bridge is more prone to a type of buzz caused by inadequate pressure on the saddle. If the action is set fairly high (like Joe likes), the tonal differences are almost non-existent, but if it's set low (like most guys buying a $5,000 guitar want), it can't get enough pressure on the saddle and resonates oddly. Both of the Jimmy Page Telecasters I've set up came with the strings top loaded, and the customer requested that I put them through the body instead both times.
@@cobowe I think most people fall in love with the guitar because of the way it sounds.
@@cobowe no.
Guitarists are, if anything, a conservative bunch. We’re more superstitious than sailors too.
I’ve always said this
I've been playing for less than 2 months and I've already noticed this about the guitar community haha. I've made a promise to myself to not get sucked into that attitude.
@@peterklein5861 it’s built on a mentality of “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it”, and the mysterious properties of wood. I can guarantee you won’t be able to escape all of it
@@peterklein5861 Pete I can tell you for sure, you first getting into this all, you will experiment and that’s all fun and good. Most importantly, is that you have fun doing it. If it sounds great to you don’t change a damn thing. If it doesn’t there are plenty of options. Most players can’t hear the difference but with a good pair of headphones you can. If Fender cranked out a bunch of Tele’s they will all sound slightly different. The easy thing to do? Pick one up and play it, you will know then and there if she is coming home with you.
Loved the "DIY Isaac Newton" comment.
Learning so much about music and guitar from this channel. Keep it up!
It took me 30 years to realize that the telecaster is the best guitar ever made
Haha, me too. Ignored it for almost 30 years myself then bought one and became totally hooked! I top load too.
Same here, i'm buying my first one today as we speak.
I've been dodging buying one for years now. Evéry time I buy a Guitar I think....I should replace my old Tele...but for the money, look at all the other shiney , flashy stuff on the market!
6 times I've gone to buy a new guitar, and I always come back with something different. I just did it again with a Charvel (sue me!).
I lost my trusty Black US Tele to a Pawnshop 20 yrs ago. And I quit playing guitar entirely over it, for over 15 years.
I gotta get me a piano black U.S. Tele again. My soul needs it.
Strat is
@@clarkwestfield7818 Cheers Bro
Forget Hendrix, Clapton, Knopfler, Gilmore, etc. Here's Chris Buck! Great playing again, every time I watch and hear you play I get inspired and grab for my guitar, only to find out that I'm not there yet.
His outro from last week was by far my favorite. I've spent thus week getting down. I have a ways to go.
Who is Gilmore? One of the girls? ;)
I also want to pick up my guitars ....and use them as firewood after watching him.....:)
@@mattgilbert7347 it's amazing how many people - fans, no less - misspell his last name.
Without those players you aren't going to have a Chris Buck
I think the lesson here is, if you can play (and you Chris most certainly can sir), then everything else is minutiae.
Nothing makes a difference and all guitars sound the same.
Touche! Point (match AND round) to Chris...as usual.
Word. Just like Justin Johnson could get better sound from a gas can guitar or 3-string shovel then I could out of a suhr or Martin or Ernie ball.
@@richsackett3423 you’re not an experienced enough player if you can’t tell the difference between guitars. Or maybe you have really bad ears
@@omarcapaso7156 Not what I meant in the slightest. It was sarcasm directed at the ridiculous statement, "everything else is minutiae".
"DIY Isaac Newtons"...that's hilarious!
Or rude and dismissive.
Nope, definitely hilarious!
Definitely hilarious. 😂
Definitely funny as hell!
100% Hilarious- because they always trash him here- about time he called them out.
my mom had a top loader, then they came out with the front loaders but they get mold build up on the door seal, what we arnt talking about washing machines. sorry wrong video
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I just spent $1200 to go from a mold-farm washer to a non-he top loader.
Front loaders suck ! Mine leaks water 🤷.
Chris Buck: "The worst thing Fender ever did to a Telecaster?"
Also Chris Buck:
I don’t want to learn how to play a guitar, I want to learn to Chris Buck the hell out of a guitar.
The kid is a magician with a piece of wood and six strings!!!!!!
Put a Bigsby on it
Craig Crider:::::::::::::::::::::::::::"The worst thing Fender ever did to a Telecaster?"
When Fender sold to CBS..
Freaking 10 pound boat anchor 70's guitars.
Maple necks dipped in polyurethane.
Micro tilt neck adjuster.
His title got me here too lol. I’m like what the hell is the worst thing Tele has done? For me is that I’m not okay with just having one. That’s why I ordered another and I know I’m not just okay with that either lol.
I used to like John Mayer. Now I like Chris Buck.
+1
Mayer is a great compositor. And i think that it is harder to compose really great songs that will touch many thousands than great solos. Chris is fantastic here with his riffs but let hear that an full albums, that’s an other game.
@@clust11 Ofcourse, that's another topic. I value Mayer for his composer work. I just like to listen Chris more when I'm in the mood for some bluesy stuff :)
I can hear a tad bit more top end with the top load. I even tried it double-blind. But it could literally be that you played it just ever so slightly different in each take. Certainly not even enough for it to be of worry for any gig or recording. When I say tad, I mean only just enough to say it is there. I have played both side by side before and for feel, I can't say it is appreciable either. Sure, maybe ever so slightly different, but it could just be because they were different guitars. I think it is really nothing to bother over, and that the only real reason to choose one over the other is for the economy.
I agree. On the single note lead guitar stuff just a little less low end, very subtle and not a big issue as far as having one or the other. They’re both great!
ive considered the very same thing.....cool comment
Frankly I couldn't hear any difference. Now I must admit that I have that more often with TH-cam comparisons. Even if I know from live comparison that there actually is a difference. The compression on TH-cam compromises the audio that much. I have a collection of 94 guitars amount then write a few telecasters (brilliant guitars), 3 top loaders and 10 string troughs. I really can't hear a difference even if I change strings and switch to string through on the same guitar.
Absolutely agreed. Top-loading sounds and feel different. Same on Les Pauls.
Agreed. I also thought the string-through was louder near the attack and the top-load kept more volume later into the sustain. It's a tiny difference between two great sounds and the greatness of the sound comes from the player, not the string loading.
Goddamn the intro was roaring and explosive in playing and tone. Sounds like Derek trucks and you're not even playing with a slide. HOW U DO THAT ON A TELE!!!????
Yes he reminds me a little of Derek Trucks as well
The string thru is warmer more prominently on the upper strings. There's a slight bit of brighter ping on the top loaded. But you really have to pay attention to notice the difference. I wonder if you notice more difference if played on dimed Plexi and doing pinch harmonics. Like a VH - ZZ hybrid version. :P
Yeah, I thought the top loader was a bit brighter. But not enough to matter very much.
My objection to the top loader is more along the lines of it not being as tidy? I like those unsightly string ends tucked away. My tele has those slotted tuning pegs, so everything's nice and cozy, all tucked in.
This is obviously completely silly and unnecessary, but dammit, I like it.
@@hannaro That's all that counts.
I expect that if Leo had made the first Teles as toploaders, we'd consider string-thru inferior. I have a 1996 Mexican Tele that was originally a toploader, and I converted it to string-thru. I also swapped the bridge for a brass Gotoh one at the same time, so it's not possible to compare the stringing change.
I've got the Mirror Tele and it's absolutely PHENOMENAL! I keep it top loaded because that's how Jimmy Page done it. I also have a standard Tele as well that I also love. Tele's are awesome.
Seems like a baseless and antiquated opinion carried on by guitar snobs lol
Think of guitars as structural recipes, where various differences are on one hand obviously true/‘real’ (design, construction, materials, etc) & on the other, pretty damned subjective (can you feel/hear/tell the diff?)...
I found the top loader to be a bit brighter. The sustain is almost identical on both but I liked the top loader’s sound better.
@Augustus Ceasar Bro, I just said what I heard, I probably would get it wrong but I feel that there is a difference, I like the top loader's tone more, and I have the right to say so.
Same here...
I agree, more presence, equal sustain.
Yep, I felt the same. Crisper sound with the top loader on all the clips. Then again, there's probably no group of people more guilty of tricking themselves into hearing ghosts and unicorns than us guitarists, so who knows? Could be something else causing the difference (if there is one) too.
DAMN Chris! You have to put big tone warnings before melting our brains, that tele tone just hit my face Its full force.
I truly, truly do not care how my strings are attached lmao. I just care that my guitar plays well, intonates, and stays in tune
I thought the top loaded sounded a tad brighter. Either way it sounds great, especially when played by Chris Buck! I love Teles, got 5 of em (different makes and models, only 1 a Fender) and they each have their own sound.
The string-through style is a more elegant solution aesthetically, but I can’t hear any difference.
Guitarists are a strange bunch
Some players don't want you to see their balls, at the string ends.
Not many guitar players can surprise me with every new piece, you're just doing that on a weekly basis with every note coming out of your brain and fingers, I am in complete awe of your playing, tone and in the feeling you put into your every licks. Fresh and explosive. Keep them coming.
Did you c*m?
Brilliant.... DIY Isaac Newtons.....😂
Maybe it's just me, but top loaded sounds a little bit brighter, on this video anyway. I think it may have sounded better top loaded. Hard to discern though.
It does.
Yup especially lower strings
Ok ok guys I swear I can tell a difference. It’s so irrelevant but it is there. I put the audio into an EQ display and the Q of the peak low mids shifts from about 450Hz on string thru to 600Hz on the toploader consistently. This makes sense as the string though is resonating the wood a little more. By that logic, the GE smith Telecaster’s thicker tone on the bridge pickup could be attributed to the fact that the pickup is mounted directly into the body instead of suspended by the bridge plate; once again bringing the resonance of the body into play a little bit more. Doesn’t really matter, but the difference is there.
I'm surprised more commenters didn't hear a difference. I did, and your analysis seems to accurately quantify what I heard.
@@mcriff422 I'm in
The top-load sounds a bit clearer through the range, while the string-thru sounds a bit mushy in the low end. Maybe I'm imagining it - I can't play guitar with my fingers, so I learned the bass.
That intro jam was absolutely extreme.
Real simple, the top loading Tele is a bitch to restring. I have one and had it modified to through the body.
Having cobbled together a few guitars from scratch, I can tell you the string break angle on a string through vs. top load makes a difference on bridge tension, so from my perspective, top loader is easier on equipment.
Yes I break noticeably fewer strings top-loaded
That intro jam. wtf. now i know what chris buck sounds like
Beautiful playing and brilliant content, as ever. Congrats on the 100k!
This argument goes on forever about the top loading thing. I just wish I could play like Chris Buck. I should practice more.
Of course, practicing is how we get better, BUT, what Chris has and can do has nothing whatsoever to do with mere practice. I'm certain that I could practice 24 hours a day, every day, and never be able to play as well as Chris. Sure, he must practice as well as the rest of us but that's where "the rest of us" gets left in the dust. Unlike virtually all of "the rest of us", Chris is a remarkably talented musician. So what does that mean? Well, it means many things but most of all that his musical imagination is what it is which, in my opinion, is that of simply one of the finest, most melodic, and powerful guitar players I have ever heard. That's all.
As for top or body through string-loading, just play your guitar and forget all of that nonsense.
Chris Buck is an absolute guitar BEAST! I love your playing! Thank you for all the wonderful videos.
I suck as a guitar player, but man am I passionate about guitars and the music, and these episodes of yours, Mr. Buck, are absolute gold. Please, do carry on for a long time doing these, because - besides playing the instrument - you have a talent in telling its stories. Bravo.
Feel like the top loader is a bit more trebly
it's very subtle indeed but I agree.. had just a touch more presence (air) to my ear.
I agree too
I heard the same as well, I would choose string through
Seemed a tad brighter to me as well.
Fucking hilarious. Despite the fact there's literally no difference you're all in here claiming otherwise.
I suspect you all think rosewood fretboards sound "warmer" too, right?
What a joke.
Here's a video suggestion.. "How to play like Chris Buck!"
I find it's all a matter of personal taste. I once had a Telecaster with a Bigsby. It just didn't sound right to me, but to my friend, it was great. To each his own.
I am on your side. Bigsby kills sustain. The strings should be as straight as possible, which is the premise. Then, smaller break angle, greater sustain.
@@134SASAKI The worst Bigsby offense to me is when someone puts one on a perfectly functioning 335. I also don't like to see one on a Tele either though.
As you say to each his own - I built a tele and it came out as a bit of a dud, no sustain, no bite, just dull uninspiring thuds. I then put a Bigsby on it (with the same ashtray bridge) and it came alive, it’s my main guitar now
@@drbanana1930 that happened to me, too. I built an Andy Summers style Telecaster and it just didn't resonate or sound good to me, no more I did.
Sounds pretty damned good when you play it 🤷🏻♂️
To paraphrase Mr Zappa, “Shut Your Eyes and Play The Guitar”.
only Frank didn't, he should have shut his mouth and played through.
Dude. You sound phenomenal. Tell me you're like, Mick Taylor's son or something. I'm hoping someone with your skill would be touring with someone. But then, with covid and all. Your technique is sick. I think of myself as good, but I'm not in your league. Not with that technique.
I could watch Chris Buck playing for hours with nothing other than the right hand closeups. Just insanely talented. The sheer number of hours he must've put into his craft to become the player he is is nearly unfathomable.
"The sheer number of hours he must've put into his craft to become the player he is is nearly unfathomable." You're a hysteric. Just talk normal. "He must have put in a lot of hours."
@@Frip36 Considering you lack a grasp of basic grammar, I'm not sure you're setting yourself up for success in reprimanding others for the manner in which they communicate. But, sure, have at it, dummy.
There is a difference clearly audible in the bass/low-mids. The strung through body is much more present in the lows and the chordal overtones hold together longer, the top loaded string set just doesn't have as much resonance. In a mix with a full group, I might prefer the top loaded set as who really cares when the bass will be stepping all over that region anyway and too much of that just makes everything sound boomy. But, in a setting where the full register of the guitar would be on display (or the bassist sucks) the top loaded setup would annoy me, through body all the way in that case.
Wow you must be a irtuosa !
I use string through on bottom 3 and top 3 are top loaded, that way power chords are just a little thicker and the strings are more responsive, and the top 3 are a little slinkier.
The tone difference is negligible when you can dial tone on your rig to compensate. It's all personal preference
@@superbroadcaster Good idea. It comes down to what keeps your head and more importantly your ear in the game. Bum notes, that no one else may notice, can really be distracting to you in the moment and throw you off an otherwise great performance. Do what you need to do to be comfy.
Man every time that jams are amazing!
It's a psychological thing for me. KNOWING that the strings pass through the body and that the bridge is consequently being pressed against the wood rather than pulled away from it makes me feel more confident and hear a tighter sound. Like a lot of other issues, most people probably can't tell the difference in a blindfold test; I'd certainly be one of those people.
Same, there's something about the way I know it's pushing that bridge down and not trying to yank it out of the body that inspires some sort of weird confidence. Then I play and think "you should probably fuck off about the bridge and get better."
Why don't you ponder on how the string is being bent sharply over that 90 degree bend into the hole, leading it to break sooner?
@@davidjohnston4240 I don't think I've ever had a string break on my Tele; nothing I can recall anyway, The strings eventually go dead and then I replace them. I'd also suggest that it's not that sharp a bend. I'd not have thought the cross-sectional diameter of the bridge saddles was significantly different from that of the machine head posts.
@@davidjohnston4240 Sorry about this, but although that last reply was written in total sincerity, I've just realised (it was two years ago I wrote the first comment to be fair) that when I wrote the comment you responded to, I wasn't really thinking about my Tele, but about my bass which I bought about ten years ago. it was a cheap (but good-quality neck and body-wise) P-bass copy and I customised it heavily, replacing all sub-standard parts including the bridge which was ultra flimsy and had top loading. I got a nice chunky through-body job and some string retainers and I'm happier with that. As for my Tele, I customised it about seven years after I bought it and put on a bridge unit of my own design which has a Tele-style pickup mount hinged onto a Strat-type bridge with a tremolo block underneath (THAT might fill Chris Buck with horror perhaps?). This brings up the issue that all Strats have the same bend at the bridge which you were alluding to. The most extreme angle that either through-body Teles or standard Strats put the string through, is about 45 degrees but is indeed a sharp bend. If players who break strings experience most of the breaks around this point, I'd not be surprised.
@@Maltloaflegrande I was offering a handy mental trick to adapt to a top loader. Not a fact based analysis. My real thoughts are this: My beef with the top loader and similar on many hardtail bridges (especially Fender's) is that the ball end is way too close to the bridge leading to the wrapped end sometimes reaching the bridge and not having enough adjustment range to intonate thicker strings. Just make the bridge a few mm longer, moving the ball end of the string back and you solve both problems. I've built a couple of partscasters with the schaller hardtail bridge with the string spacing adjustment. That does give more room. You could put 13s on that sucker and not run out of intonation range on the low E string.
As a little experiment....think I'll see if my original 59 les paul would sound better a string through.gotta be accurate with the drill though ain't I don't want to ruin it.
Good Grief, don't do it, it's non reversible.
99.999% of listeners couldn't tell the difference in a true random, blindfold test.
So then the TONE WOOD debate will finaly die.
The same with maple caps.
@mike austin: 60% of all statistics are made up.
@@cosmikrelic4815 I only believe in statistics I' ve made up.
Winston Churchill
@@cosmikrelic4815 And that is FALSE NEWS..
Jesus christ this guy can play well.
His strumming hand has it's own brain.
Awesome playing at the top of the video. I like the top load. Just don't like the holes all the way through the body. I used to love the idea until I got two dean string through bodies and a 12 string tele that is half and half. They sound more tinny and strat like probably in my head but I was expecting the opposite..so there ya go.
More high end on the top load. Definitely. Just ever so slightly thinner sounding. Very subtle...but appreciable.
Noticed that too, but I always wonder as a newbie, if the amp can correct it if you want.
I've played guitar for over 55+ years, and every acoustic, Gibson electric, PRS electric and every Fender bass I've owned has been a top-loader. I have used Fender electric guitars with both through-body and top-load.....even one particular Telecaster has had both.....and I can testify there is SO LITTLE difference that I simply don't trust anyone who claims there is any. The top-loaders SOUND the same, they FEEL the same, they SUSTAIN the same, etc. All too often, we guitarists choose guitars and form opinions with our EYES.....and not our ears and hands. Unless you are Eric Johnson, and can "hear" the difference in battery brands in pedals (as he claims) I defy you to tell any difference in Telecasters (or even hard-tail Strats) with top-loading bridges vs. string-through. (with all respect)
PS.....nice playing, youngster!
Top loading unwound G string and routing the other 5 strings thru the body creates a more balanced overtone series on open chord above the 5th fret voicings in double dropped D tuning when using the bridge pickup with the tone rolled off to 7. But only when intonated compromised or just tuning at 436Hz, but not equal temperment with wound G string.
Yep. Much ado about nothing. I top-load my Teles. Great video Chris.
The top loaded tele is noticeably brighter to my ears...Im surprised to hear you couldn’t hear the difference in the room Chris, perhaps the video/TH-cam boosts certain frequencies making it more obvious ?
I thought the same. More of a ring. String through was smoother. That's said I'm tone deaf. So what do I know.
If he did not tell you which was which, you would not even know...if he played the piece twice with string through you would be rambling about the slight difference etc of the one you thought was toploaded. They should do a blind test and see how many of you look like fools
holy fuck that tone at the beginning how
If it's good enough for the Jim's, it's good enough for me! Love my toploader!
The WORST thing Fender ever did to a Telecaster was to steal it away from its original gig as a boat paddle.
Thanks Chris for this flashback and analysis. Personally I prefer the strung through version (which I also own) but at the end of the day it depends on the player. You and your guitar always looks to me like a unit. I very much love the outro of your video, hot stuff as always. Cheers
Here's all the things I like about the Telecaster.
1. It's a slab and a plank, screwed together, simple rugged; a man's guitar.
2. You have a Tele, you're part of the club, welcome in any genre.
3. The body edges aren't rounded off too much.
4. A delicate, elegant head with little things to hold down the strings.
5. The controls in a simple plate that looks like it was positioned to intentionally break up the line of the scratch plate.
6. The scratch plate accurately follows the line of the body.
7. The strap huttons are sensibly positioned.
8. On the 72 the name TELECASTER is picked out in bold black capitals on the head.
9. The thinline is hollow.
10. The thinline has an elegant F hole.
11. There's a nifty B bender.
12. The deluxe and shawbucker have matching pickups.
13. That swamp ash has an open grain that you can feel with your fingers.
14. The thinline comes with elegant body piping on the edges.
15. Skunk strip.
At first I thought there was no noticeable difference, then in the Hendrix clip I thought top-loaded was slightly brighter, but my main thought was if the playing made more difference than the setup.
That being said, Aaron from Warmoth did a nice shootout essentially showing that when you aim to play the same track the same way even on different days, the difference is so slight if perceivable, that any change in gear/setup is more likely to be a bigger factor. So I suppose that either it was psychological or top-loaded might've been just ever so slightly brighter.
If I had to theorize why it would be, the strings through body might introduce more interaction with the body and let the lower frequencies come out as more balanced spectrum. Just like brass nut seems to be brighter. Sounds believable, but wouldn't put my money on the observation or the theory.
At the end of the day the difference, if it is there, is so slight that it's better to just get a good sound, play and forget it. Would probably opt for the top-loader just for the gigging purposes, seems faster to restring.
And about the brass nut one would think it would only make a difference on the open string, wouldn’t it, because once you’ve fretted it would seem to be out of the picture. Well there must be people that have hearing approximating a jack rabbits’, As I’ve heard a few people say there is a difference
Through string, top loading, not much difference, but either way......maan, you play a mean guitar, and I don't say that often. Wow 👍
Chris has the busiest fingers in the business. He plays 80% more notes than Dave Gilmour, uses tons of finger vibrato, he slides up and down to notes effortlessly and hybrid picks between fingers and a pick. Fascinating to watch!
It makes me tired just watching.
@@Dreyno what are we talking about, i fell asleep
Yeah, dude rips
My lord it took 2 years to see this guy, and a science nerd and then he has more notes than Gilmour? Maybe true, but Gilmours notes are the ones that are at every record shop, made him a multi millionaire, but mainly the top 5 most talented and innovative guitar player, but even more a pure artist. Nerd
Imagine how good he will be when he plays 80 percent less notes
Chris what is that sound you have on the opening track? Your guitar sound is so heavy is brilliant
Is it a fuzz
It kinda sounds like an MXR blue box octave fuzz, and considering jimmy page used one it would make sense, but don’t quote me on that
I had a bitch of a time finding a suitable top loader to build a Jeff Buckley tribute. I've had several Teles, and I prefer the toploaders.
Jeff Beck hated that guitar, that's why he gave it to Jimmy Page.
Where did you hear that from?
@@alexhighfield1891 Sorry, I can't remember the exact JB interview. I have watched (and read) an awful lot of them. It is probably here on TH-cam somewhere. Unless it was a print source. If I remember correctly he didn't say why he hated it, just that it sounded terrible, to him, compared to the one he kept.
I found one source, but TH-cam wouldn't let me post the link. If you google something like, "Jeff Beck on giving Jimmy Page the Stairway tele" it is out there. I found it on Reverb dot com.
Heh, cool. If so, Jimmy didn't do too bad with it !
True.
I can't hear the difference & frankly, it doesn't matter anyway. The only thing that counts is a guitarist's ability. A great guitarist could be playing the cheapest Korean Tele ever made & the sound he produces will be sought after by every guitar aficionado out there. All of a sudden, that particular sound becomes the only one everybody wants.
Well,
I once saw an interview with Billy Gibbons where he asserted that he wrapped strings over the top of the stop bar on his LP because it made string bending easier. GIven that he's palyed more years than most of us have been alive, I'll take his word for it. Same idea - less resting string tension.
How do strings the have so little mass, compared to a solid plank of wood, have any effect on the sustain and resonance of a solid body guitar? Answer .... they don't.
When your tone is as deliciously filthy as that jam at the end, who cares?!
The older you are, the better the tone & sustain. Your bones are pretty hollow at that age & your fingers resonate well on the fretboard. *In theory* 😆
People forget that listening is an interpretive act. Not only is the physical structure of each person's ear different, the brain that analyzes the signal and makes sense of it is different in each case. More of what we hear comes from our own perceptive apparatus than we want to realize. We all want to think we are hearing things exactly as they are, so we can say others are hearing it incorrectly, but everyone is hearing their own interpretation of the original stimulus. The endless debates about some of these minutiae are absurd. I hear Laurel.... you?
Might be wrong, but I don't think Fender has made a hard tail (string through?) Strat in a long time. Bet they'd sell like hot cakes.
Your playing is killer! First time hearing you. Keep up the good work!
Oh, wow! Thank you so much Dweezil! That’s incredibly kind of you 🙂 Hope you’re well!
Man just love your playing ! Can you please talk about how you got that tone in the intro?! Almost sounds like octave pedal ?
To me i ask myself how much string is vibrating past the bridge. None? So how much diff can it make?
Absolutely! Who knew?
Top Loader Bridge was amazing , I used to have a Squier 20th Anniversary Telecaster which was all Black with a Maple neck looked like something Gilmour would play and the Strings being strung through the bridge instead of through the body sounds better in my opinion , more sustain , more power as it increases bass and gets rid of that nasty treble sound , This is why Page loved it , it made it like a mini Les Paul .
DIY Newton's with their nonsense like tonewood and any opinion on a guitar they've never owned or even played
Cool! I have an 82 tele that’s top loaded and I was totally mystified about it- so thanks for this.
I actually had an idea the other day to take a string through tele and drill some holes to accommodate asn extra set of strings to turn it into a 12 string.
how do you do that on the headstock?
That will work or Gotoh makes (made?) a 12 string fully intonated Tele bridge.
The second course of tuners can be added to the side of a standard headstock at 90 degrees with the strings passing through the face of the headstock.
There are good photos on the Telecaster forums.
Alternately a set of Steinberger tuners will also work at a bit more expense.
@@J00PIE I believe at one point in the 70s fender made a 12 string jaguar style guitar so I'd try track down one of them and put that headstock on.
Edit: turns out their was also a run of 12 string strats.
@@Riverdeepnwide that's not a bad idea. I'll see if I can find that bridge used on reverb or smthn
Yeah at that point its all in your hands not the string set up although I would love the old school lol
I first noticed you in Paul David's Improv Collab. Fell in love with that solo. You're now an addition on my list with guitarists with what I consider to be unique styles: Tim Henson, David Gilmour, Ichika Nito, Charlie Robbins, Manuel Gardner Fernandes, Marcin Patrzalek and David Maxim Micic.
Ck out Dylan Adams, a unique style w/slide & fretting all over the neck. A MONSTER!
Chris, can you tell us what's going on in your signal chain in the opening salvo? How are you getting that "amp melting down" tone? I think I've got the first part straight. We happen to use the same picks. :)
I tested a top loaded Tele I have and after I drilled through the body and restringed it. The top loaded way was easyer to bend. You are 100% right Chris Buck. Dont ever be afraid to tell the truth about the truth.
you area great guitar player. The top loaded guitar sounds a little smoother to me. Less spiky in a pleasant way.
I actually did hear a pretty big difference, especially on the Hendrix song
Completely agree! I thought the bass/low mids jumped out more. I wonder what the combo of bass strings top-loaded and treble strings string-through (or vice-versa) would sound like.
@@out99990 Yeah and I thought the highest of the highs jump out a lot more too (if that's even a term) with the top loaded bridge
tbx123::::: Actual the top loader had a bit more dynamics and voicing..
@@petelucchini1168 What the fuck does that even mean?
Top Loaded is slightly less rich in tone...or more twangy.
I think that there is a pleasant stringiness in the top loading sound.
You can Never REALLY tell the difference in the videos on my phone. Sounds great either way to me !
Honestly I can’t figure out why Jimmy Page is so revered you are easily 100 times better 🥂
Hi Chris, awesome tone in the intro jam! Could you please let us know how you got this tone?
Man it's such a shame there isn't really a place for rock music in top 40 anymore. This guy legit could've been the next big ICON. He's got his own style and could play circles around anyone out there. Super talented guy. Hope he sells out an arena one day - he deserves it
Hahaha great joke about diy Issac newtons in comments
“...Leo Fender, being famously thrifty...”
You mean the Leo Fender who snipped “Broadcaster” from the headstock decals, using them with only the “Fender” brand name instead of spending the money on printing new ones with “Telecaster,” thus, creating the relatively short-lived “Nocaster.” *THAT* Leo Fender?? 😂😂😂
He wasn't "sued" by Gretsch, there wasn't even a cease and desist letter. Gretsch sent him a telegram politely asking him to stop using the name, complete with a "please" and "thank you", so he did. It was the early 50s- frivolous lawsuits weren't a thing yet, lol.
@@michaelwoods9005 you’re absolutely correct, thanks. I was really speaking toward Leo Fender’s reputation for being “thrifty,” though. I’ll just edit out the part about the lawsuit that never happened so that it doesn’t perpetuate that false rumor. Again, thanks.
The leo fender thatcinvented the finest amps gits ever and probobly had a problem with a snob who thought he stole the name.chopped it off never used it again.too busy making history.
Is any of this of any importance or what .signing off perm.
Downright filth!!!😆
Exceptional playing as always Chris... gonna keep trying to nail your 'easier' licks before arthritis gets the better of me fingers 😁
There is slightly less body in the sound on the top-loaded one. The sound and the feel seems a little lighter. But the differense is quite subtle. Like always, the sound remains in the fingers.
Bullshit.
Hey Chris I love my weekly fix of Friday Fretworks! How about doing an episode on the original Yamaha SG series of guitars from the 1970s! They were very well made guitars and very well respected and also still receive a lot of attentio, even now when they are no longer in production. Keep up the good work Chris!
I’m wondering how, when the pitch is determined by the length and tension of the vibrating part of the string, top loading vs through-body changes how it feels or sounds. My big takeaway, not being a DIY Isaac Newton (lol!), is that whatever Chris Buck plays, it sounds like Chris Buck. Which, by the way, is bloody marvellous!!