3 Millennial Views Compared and Contrasted: Premillennialism, Amillennialism, and Postmillennialism
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ก.ย. 2024
- A point-by-point comparison and contrast of Premillennialism, Amillennialism, and Postmillennialism. Where these millennial views agree and differ with each other on the millennium, present age, kingdom, David's throne, Israel, hermeneutics, etc.
Get info on Michael Vlach's new video course, "Biblical Eschatology: What the Bible Teaches about Future Events. " For more info on this course click here: www.michaeljvl...
For info on Michael's books go to www.michaeljvl...
This is an excellent explanation of the vivid contrast in the views. Dispensationalism interprets history in a consistent literal, historical, and grammatical framework. It takes Scripture at face value and avoids the subjective spiritualizing of the text, as the opposing views do. By spiritualizing or allegorizing prophecy, it is conceivable to make the Bible say anything you want it to say. This is dangerous and counterintuitive, in my understanding. I appreciate Dr. Vlach's even-handed treatment of the subject.
Finally fully caught up on all your lectures. I want to thank you, your work was a blessing to me. I look forward for the rest of your work.
Wow! I am very honored you watched all these. Thank you!
Keep up that podcast on Spotify. What a blessing!
Thank you Dr. Vlach!!
Excellent summary. Thanks so much!
Very helpful! Thank you
Are there some shared ideas with preterism and post-millenialism.
Clearly, the Bible talks about a literal and physical presence of Christ on the earth ruling for one thousand years and clearly historically this has yet to happen. Like it or not, we are in the pre-millennial age.
I am premillenialist but, on the nature of Jesusc reign during this age, I mostly agree with amillenialism and some points of postmillenialism
I’m with Dr Vlach as a staunchly dispensational Zionist premillennialist. I pick that a far more critical point for me is I’m not convinced God’s promises made to Israel in OT are transformed/enlarged/spiritualised into the Gentile-dominant (or believers from all over the world) Church. They will be fulfilled on a believing Israel (physical descendants of Abraham through Issac and Jacob) - as Israel. Since the promises hadn’t bern fulfilled understood Israel -> the fulfillment is still in the future. I hold this point as more “non-negotiable” than merely the millennial kingdom itself.
Which means I do have very sharp differences with believers from my local Reformed Covenantal amillennial church.
Why is post called post which to me suggests that the millennium come and gone - done and dusted.
Thank you for this! Really enjoyed it!
I was wondering if there is any difference between the three positions in relation to the eternal state (after the Millennium)?
It seems that Premillennialists don't talk much restoration and "returning to the Garden of Eden" like the other two views do. Is there a reason for that?
Thank you. I cover this topic in my New Creation Model book. Recent premillennialists talk about a tangible eternal state in detail. Blaising is one example. Postmills say very very little about the eternal state. Amills are a mixture on this issue. Hoekema held to a restoration situation.