Now, the next bit to understand is to what happens in the gas - why do wide pulses produce narrow ones...waiting for a second part! Thanks a lot - you are a star!
A photon is essentially a traveling wave quantity in the electromagnetic field that can impart force. This longer wavelength light imparts electromagnetic energy on the electrons of the noble gas. The electron gets bumped up into a higher energy state until electromagnetic forces in the atomic structure pull it back down. When it reverses that energy it obtained from the long wave light it produces its own light as a balancing result. Each element has its own set of harmonics in what wavelength it produces in this process, which is why we can accurately use these noble gases to produce specific wavelengths of light for this effect we want in creating pulses.
4:06 " ... for the study of electron dynamics in matter. " 5:00 the trouble is that within atoms move around very very quickly too quickly for even our fosc pulses to give us an accurate picture 5:08 for example
Could you do another vid explaining what they then "saw" regarding the electrons i.e. what were they up to and where were they going? Are quantum leaps between shells not instantaneous? Good vid.
So dissapointed your content doesn't have more views. I love physics TH-cam and only just found your channel. Keep it up---you're one of a few channels that I feel strike just the right balance between simple and complex explanation.
Like sound into water or sound into sand particles on vibrating plate -or now light light into gas - creates harmonics - wow all is what tesla said - all is vibration -music of the cosmos following the cord phi and pi.
In 5:19 sir you have used inner shell electrons and once it is ejected, it is filled by a higher shell electron. Here, could you please clarify me regarding which is higher energy shell.....?
The smaller sized shell near the nucleus has low energy. As you travel outwards, the electrons in the larger shells have higher and higher energies per electron, their energy levels increasing with their increasing distance from the nucleus.
Aren't the shells in Boh'r model quantised? Then how will you observe the trajectory of the electrons with the laser when they just quantum ''teleport'' to the other shell?
Hi Parth, Thanks for the excellent video! But I am struggling with this new term pulse (technically speaking). In terms of frequency/wavelength, how do you define pulse of Laser (light) please?
Hello Parth. On the path to understanding various concepts in physics, students are required to start at the bottom with simple geometry and Algebra. This is a given. Somewhere along the way though, a lot of Greek letters start turning up and this is what throws me off. For the life of me, I can't find out which of these letters are related to which area of physics and there's no real way for me to google them. I don't know where exactly to start. Would it be possible to make a video explaining the concepts of these various symbols and what they mean and how to choose which ones to apply when trying to solve problems? I hope my request makes sense. Thank you.
Superluminal, nearly instantaneous EM pulses were observed in the nearfield of a resent experiment! See the last paper linked below. The speed of light is not a constant as once thought, and this has now been proved by Electrodynamic theory and by Experiments done by many independent researchers. The results clearly show that light propagates instantaneously when it is created by a source, and reduces to approximately the speed of light in the farfield, about one wavelength from the source, and never becomes equal to exactly c. This corresponds the phase speed, group speed, and information speed. Any theory assuming the speed of light is a constant, such as Special Relativity and General Relativity are wrong, and it has implications to Quantum theories as well. So this fact about the speed of light affects all of Modern Physics. Often it is stated that Relativity has been verified by so many experiments, how can it be wrong. Well no experiment can prove a theory, and can only provide evidence that a theory is correct. But one experiment can absolutely disprove a theory, and the new speed of light experiments proving the speed of light is not a constant is such a proof. So what does it mean? Well a derivation of Relativity using instantaneous nearfield light yields Galilean Relativity. This can easily seen by inserting c=infinity into the Lorentz Transform, yielding the GalileanTransform, where time is the same in all inertial frames. So a moving object observed with instantaneous nearfield light will yield no Relativistic effects, whereas by changing the frequency of the light such that farfield light is used will observe Relativistic effects. But since time and space are real and independent of the frequency of light used to measure its effects, then one must conclude the effects of Relativity are just an optical illusion. Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, then it has the same problem. A better theory of Gravity is Gravitoelectromagnetism which assumes gravity can be mathematically described by 4 Maxwell equations, similar to to those of electromagnetic theory. It is well known that General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism for weak fields, which is all that we observe. Using this theory, analysis of an oscillating mass yields a wave equation set equal to a source term. Analysis of this equation shows that the phase speed, group speed, and information speed are instantaneous in the nearfield and reduce to the speed of light in the farfield. This theory then accounts for all the observed gravitational effects including instantaneous nearfield and the speed of light farfield. The main difference is that this theory is a field theory, and not a geometrical theory like General Relativity. Because it is a field theory, Gravity can be then be quantized as the Graviton. Lastly it should be mentioned that this research shows that the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics can no longer be criticized for requiring instantaneous interaction of the pilot wave, thereby violating Relativity. It should also be noted that nearfield electromagnetic fields can be explained by quantum mechanics using the Pilot Wave interpretation of quantum mechanics and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (HUP), where Δx and Δp are interpreted as averages, and not the uncertainty in the values as in other interpretations of quantum mechanics. So in HUP: Δx Δp = h, where Δp=mΔv, and m is an effective mass due to momentum, thus HUP becomes: Δx Δv = h/m. In the nearfield where the field is created, Δx=0, therefore Δv=infinity. In the farfield, HUP: Δx Δp = h, where p = h/λ. HUP then becomes: Δx h/λ = h, or Δx=λ. Also in the farfield HUP becomes: λmΔv=h, thus Δv=h/(mλ). Since p=h/λ, then Δv=p/m. Also since p=mc, then Δv=c. So in summary, in the nearfield Δv=infinity, and in the farfield Δv=c, where Δv is the average velocity of the photon according to Pilot Wave theory. Consequently the Pilot wave interpretation should become the preferred interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. It should also be noted that this argument can be applied to all fields, including the graviton. Hence all fields should exhibit instantaneous nearfield and speed c farfield behavior, and this can explain the non-local effects observed in quantum entangled particles. *TH-cam presentation of above arguments: th-cam.com/video/sePdJ7vSQvQ/w-d-xo.html *More extensive paper for the above arguments: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, A New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023: vixra.org/abs/2309.0145 *Electromagnetic pulse experiment paper: www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170862178.82175798/v1 Dr. William Walker - PhD in physics from ETH Zurich, 1997
This is the way we generate beats in class using sound waves. The number of beats is the difference between the frequencies. Of all the great research being done, the Nobel committee decided this was the most outstanding research thus deserving the Nobel Prize. Le me propose the following which will probably genrate a lot of hateful responses from outraged viewers. Could it be that the inclusion of a woman in the award played a role in the decision? Let's be honest here, the Nobel committe are most likely a bunch of progressive leftists and the chance to award a prize to the fifth woman ever was on their minds.
Now, the next bit to understand is to what happens in the gas - why do wide pulses produce narrow ones...waiting for a second part! Thanks a lot - you are a star!
A photon is essentially a traveling wave quantity in the electromagnetic field that can impart force.
This longer wavelength light imparts electromagnetic energy on the electrons of the noble gas. The electron gets bumped up into a higher energy state until electromagnetic forces in the atomic structure pull it back down. When it reverses that energy it obtained from the long wave light it produces its own light as a balancing result. Each element has its own set of harmonics in what wavelength it produces in this process, which is why we can accurately use these noble gases to produce specific wavelengths of light for this effect we want in creating pulses.
@@aerostorm_ Thanks! Is this effect similar to or based on the emission spectrum of a particular gas?
4:06 " ... for the study of electron dynamics in matter. " 5:00 the trouble is that within atoms move around very very quickly too quickly for even our fosc pulses to give us an accurate picture 5:08 for example
You have amazing skills of understanding the concepts and describing them beautifully.
With respect ... Everyone can achieve that with practice and thinking
Congratulations!!!
So good Parth
As a Laser enthusiastic person you would read their papers :)
It's good you're getting into colour grading!
Could you do another vid explaining what they then "saw" regarding the electrons i.e. what were they up to and where were they going? Are quantum leaps between shells not instantaneous? Good vid.
Great video 🙂👍
Finally a subject befitting my attention span. :P
Thanks for the explanation Parth.
An example of what one might learn with attosecond pulses would be helpful. That would be a good place to start the video.
please explain the physics from the start to end. you understand it very well. please
So dissapointed your content doesn't have more views. I love physics TH-cam and only just found your channel. Keep it up---you're one of a few channels that I feel strike just the right balance between simple and complex explanation.
Like sound into water or sound into sand particles on vibrating plate -or now light light into gas - creates harmonics - wow all is what tesla said - all is vibration -music of the cosmos following the cord phi and pi.
Thanks again, and again. Wonderfully explained.
Damn! That's a good short and sweet explanation which covers all the major key points👍
In 5:19 sir you have used inner shell electrons and once it is ejected, it is filled by a higher shell electron. Here, could you please clarify me regarding which is higher energy shell.....?
The smaller sized shell near the nucleus has low energy.
As you travel outwards, the electrons in the larger shells have higher and higher energies per electron, their energy levels increasing with their increasing distance from the nucleus.
Aren't the shells in Boh'r model quantised? Then how will you observe the trajectory of the electrons with the laser when they just quantum ''teleport'' to the other shell?
Thanks for explaining and sharing 👍
Great video as always, will You cover the physics-related nobel prizes as well? (for example quantum dots in chemistry)
Would attosecond pulses enable LIGO to be more sensitive to gravitational waves?
Thank you❤️
Simple explanation of this physics phenomenon for a layman. Good job 👍👏
really informative
Which wave are you talking about ? Is it radio wave or acoustic wave or some other wave, properties may differ among one another.
Great explanation👍
Hi Parth,
Thanks for the excellent video! But I am struggling with this new term pulse (technically speaking). In terms of frequency/wavelength, how do you define pulse of Laser (light) please?
Wish you made more content.
Sir, please suggest topics and tips on how to write a physics research paper.
Hello Parth.
On the path to understanding various concepts in physics, students are required to start at the bottom with simple geometry and Algebra. This is a given.
Somewhere along the way though, a lot of Greek letters start turning up and this is what throws me off.
For the life of me, I can't find out which of these letters are related to which area of physics and there's no real way for me to google them.
I don't know where exactly to start.
Would it be possible to make a video explaining the concepts of these various symbols and what they mean and how to choose which ones to apply when trying to solve problems?
I hope my request makes sense.
Thank you.
what could be its functional benefits to common human? Could you please explain?
I was just searching for a good video explaining this. 👍
what a great explanation
Great video
I wish Paul Corkum had gotten the Nobel prize
all amazing ,but does this help general public.Why is nobel awareded more for research stuff n not more tangible uses
Lovely
Binaural beats, but with LIGHT!
Superluminal, nearly instantaneous EM pulses were observed in the nearfield of a resent experiment! See the last paper linked below. The speed of light is not a constant as once thought, and this has now been proved by Electrodynamic theory and by Experiments done by many independent researchers. The results clearly show that light propagates instantaneously when it is created by a source, and reduces to approximately the speed of light in the farfield, about one wavelength from the source, and never becomes equal to exactly c. This corresponds the phase speed, group speed, and information speed. Any theory assuming the speed of light is a constant, such as Special Relativity and General Relativity are wrong, and it has implications to Quantum theories as well. So this fact about the speed of light affects all of Modern Physics. Often it is stated that Relativity has been verified by so many experiments, how can it be wrong. Well no experiment can prove a theory, and can only provide evidence that a theory is correct. But one experiment can absolutely disprove a theory, and the new speed of light experiments proving the speed of light is not a constant is such a proof. So what does it mean? Well a derivation of Relativity using instantaneous nearfield light yields Galilean Relativity. This can easily seen by inserting c=infinity into the Lorentz Transform, yielding the GalileanTransform, where time is the same in all inertial frames. So a moving object observed with instantaneous nearfield light will yield no Relativistic effects, whereas by changing the frequency of the light such that farfield light is used will observe Relativistic effects. But since time and space are real and independent of the frequency of light used to measure its effects, then one must conclude the effects of Relativity are just an optical illusion.
Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, then it has the same problem. A better theory of Gravity is Gravitoelectromagnetism which assumes gravity can be mathematically described by 4 Maxwell equations, similar to to those of electromagnetic theory. It is well known that General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism for weak fields, which is all that we observe. Using this theory, analysis of an oscillating mass yields a wave equation set equal to a source term. Analysis of this equation shows that the phase speed, group speed, and information speed are instantaneous in the nearfield and reduce to the speed of light in the farfield. This theory then accounts for all the observed gravitational effects including instantaneous nearfield and the speed of light farfield. The main difference is that this theory is a field theory, and not a geometrical theory like General Relativity. Because it is a field theory, Gravity can be then be quantized as the Graviton.
Lastly it should be mentioned that this research shows that the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics can no longer be criticized for requiring instantaneous interaction of the pilot wave, thereby violating Relativity. It should also be noted that nearfield electromagnetic fields can be explained by quantum mechanics using the Pilot Wave interpretation of quantum mechanics and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (HUP), where Δx and Δp are interpreted as averages, and not the uncertainty in the values as in other interpretations of quantum mechanics. So in HUP: Δx Δp = h, where Δp=mΔv, and m is an effective mass due to momentum, thus HUP becomes: Δx Δv = h/m. In the nearfield where the field is created, Δx=0, therefore Δv=infinity. In the farfield, HUP: Δx Δp = h, where p = h/λ. HUP then becomes: Δx h/λ = h, or Δx=λ. Also in the farfield HUP becomes: λmΔv=h, thus Δv=h/(mλ). Since p=h/λ, then Δv=p/m. Also since p=mc, then Δv=c. So in summary, in the nearfield Δv=infinity, and in the farfield Δv=c, where Δv is the average velocity of the photon according to Pilot Wave theory. Consequently the Pilot wave interpretation should become the preferred interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. It should also be noted that this argument can be applied to all fields, including the graviton. Hence all fields should exhibit instantaneous nearfield and speed c farfield behavior, and this can explain the non-local effects observed in quantum entangled particles.
*TH-cam presentation of above arguments: th-cam.com/video/sePdJ7vSQvQ/w-d-xo.html
*More extensive paper for the above arguments: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, A New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023: vixra.org/abs/2309.0145
*Electromagnetic pulse experiment paper: www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170862178.82175798/v1
Dr. William Walker - PhD in physics from ETH Zurich, 1997
"isn't a brandnew physics."
Top G
parth bro i got selected in IIT
Sup dude
Hindi m b bnao pls
Nobel Prize...
LOL
good thing feynman was wrong when he said a photon can not interfere with each other but only with self.
This is the way we generate beats in class using sound waves. The number of beats is the difference between the frequencies.
Of all the great research being done, the Nobel committee decided this was the most outstanding research thus deserving the Nobel Prize. Le me propose the following which will probably genrate a lot of hateful responses from outraged viewers. Could it be that the inclusion of a woman in the award played a role in the decision? Let's be honest here, the Nobel committe are most likely a bunch of progressive leftists and the chance to award a prize to the fifth woman ever was on their minds.
What would you have preferred been given the nobel prize?
Floatheadphysics better than u
I'm afraid your late to the party. The Science Discussed channel already told us about this days ago.