If you look at the bag of toy chica , you can see puppet's mask, funtime foxy's eye, foxy's hook, wolf's hand, pigpatch and toy bonnie's ear, and freddy's top hat. I think that William Afton is killing kids and take their specific parts, which is the face, eye, 2 hands, ears, and a hat. And try to put all together to his dead son. And that one could possibly go wrong is that putting all back together to bring his son back.
oh shoot u might be right. Here is another theory. The 7 people that chica killed might also mean the games. Think of it, scott has made 7 games. FNAF 1,2,3,4, Sister location, Pizzeria Simulator and Ultimate custom night. Maybe he is still not satisfied. I think this represents that the FNAF Games are still not over. Edit: Why would he Need a Top Hat To put his son together?
more fnaf or leon related free real estate a florida citizen leon: its free real estate a corpse oblivion: its free real estate lily tems fred bear suit: its free real estate spring trap burned also oblivion: ITS FREE REAL ESTATE
I have a theory. Toy Chica saying “there is something that could go wrong” she is referring to William Afton’s spring lock suit. For example, in the ending in fnaf 3, some thing ‘went wrong’ with the suit (due to the safe room being moist because of rain). Not sure, but it seems logical
Anyone else notice that the field with the tree that toy chica hangs out at in the last cutscene looks similar to the field with the child graves at the end of fnaf6??
Two things Dawko missed: 1. Every day Chica specifically goes on about a specific part of them, like Freddys hat on the first day, and then that aspect is what she keeps from them. And when she thought about Freddy she said he'll be MINE and said mine a lot, I think Chica is enamored with an aspect of them instead of the whole thing, she goes after them for the part of them she likes that is why she keeps that part. She wants their stuff, not them. That is why she keeps that part of them. Another thing is on the last day she goes after the pig but oddly can't find a part of him she likes, she thinks but tgen gives up and say "Looks aren't everything" so I think at this point she is now addicted to killing rather than the end result. What this means is Scott is trying to tell us we misunderstood William, when he said "I will put you back together" he did not mean he was going to put his son back together, he meant he was going to replace him with another built child. So he kills kids who have a body part like an eye he either likes or think looks like his son then stores it to create a new child, you see since William built the animatronics he may have decided he think he can also build a child. But soon enough he begins to kill not to rebuild his kud but because he is now addicted to killing, this is why Chica progressively gets crazier and decides to kill the final character in the cutscenes without liking any part of him and spends no time talking about what she likes about him like the others, instead going straight to her plan to kill him which is now much longer than any of her other plans. She/William now kills for the thrill of killing instead of for a different purpose. 2. Chica seems specifically obsessed with bringing them to her house. You think if she was planning to make them become her boyfriend she would instead be focused on confessing to them or charming them, but no Chica always specifically plans the end result to be them at her house. This and the fact she loves saying "Mine" and "Forever" a lot may mean she intends to kill them and keep them from the beginning, she has no plans to make them her boyfriend. A lot if people aasumes she wants to get together with them or that when she says only one thing can go wrong she means getting rejected but I think this is wrong, I think she only wishes to kill and keep them. Perhaps aftee she kills them she realizes they are no longer what they once were so she ends up repeating the cycle is what I originally thought, but considering how she seems only obsessed with her plan to get the pig on the last day I think she actually is in love with killing, but she doesn't realize that so she keeps trying to convince herself she Is in love with the person in order to excuse what she does. That is just my theories and what I think Dawko missed, nothing more.
"Only thing could go wrong." maybe that relates to "The one you shouldn't have killed." also maybe " I just know that there's a guy who's right for me" relates to Fredbears decoded jumpscare line "Lets find a suit that's right for you."
Hold up! I don't believe Henry's daughter was the first victim but the most "significant." One of Withered Chica's voice lines specifically says "I was the first. I have seen everything," implying that Susie was Afton's first victim. They really hammered it in FNAF6 where one of the mini-games clearly illustrates how Afton lured Susie to be killed. Now in the Chica High School intermissions, the second cutscene she states "I told him someone ran over his dog in front of my house;' a clear reference to the events prior to Susie's murder. My theory is, Susie along with Gabriel, Fritz and Jeremy were the original 4 victims killed and stuffed into animatronics (as a means of hiding the evidence). Henry's daughter was the fifth, but she ends up possessing the puppet and gained supernatural powers to "give life" to the other four. Thus the "Missing Children Incident" came to be.
Will Wesley Dawko said that the reason Henry went crazy is because his son (bite victim) got killed first so shouldn’t Henry’s daughter get kill after?
anyone ever thought that maybe the novels and games have a SPLIT timeline? instead of the being to completely different universes, what if there is one event that makes them diverge, I would think that event is in 1995 being when Charlie returns to Hurricane, maybe in the novel timeline, she chooses to investigate the pizzeria, and this triggers the present day novel events, but in the game timeline, she does not investigate, and this causes Afton to destroy the animatronics causing him to be sealed in Springtrap, years later he is found and FNAF 3, and 6 happen, and perhaps SL takes place after FNAF 3 flashbacks, explaining the SL Animatronics appearing in Novel 3. Michael just diddn't show up, or maybe he did and William took care of him.
Dawko, you theorized William's motives for killing children is because he's lost his daughter. But she was killed by baby, and baby was created for luring and killing kids (when he was creating baby, he hadn't lost any children yet, since it's presumed Elizabeth's death happened before crying child's).
Mr. Jay I don't think there is any proof she died before, Dawko assumed it just because her bed was empty in the FNAF 4 minigame, and it could be any different reason
The Toy Chica cutscenes secretly being about William Afton killing kids is brilliant. She stuffs the remains of her victims into her bag, just like William stuffs the children's remains into suits.
Dawko please read this: The main character depicted is Toy Chica the oddest of the toy animatronics because A. Only one to offer food (the cupcakes) B. Beak falls off After Henry’s daughter is killed don’t you think that he would be banned from going in there? Well this answers how William lured the children out of the building. Toy Chica was tampered with to lure children outside using treats or telling them something is happening outside. Chica’s beak falls off because she’s been tampered with. That’s why in the fruit maze mini game the words go between yellow and purple. Yellow represents what Chica is literally saying to the kids. And why is the Twisted wolf important? The only other time a twisted wolf is referenced is that pile of dirt in the Midnight racer mini game in that game you also go to JR’s and a guard tells you “you shouldn’t be here.” These two tell you that Afton has already killed the wolf kid and been caught doing so and now there’s a posted guard and William isn’t even allowed to be out-front of the building. So that’s why at the end of the Midnight motorist William just says “He’s ran off to that place again.” The kid isn’t going there because he really loves Fazbears but because it’s a safe place from his father.
I think when she says "there is only one thing that could go wrong" maybe it just implies that William is very good at planning and thinks out every scenario so he is always aware that something could always go wrong
BILL CIPHER He went back to one of the abandoned facilities to dismantle the haunted animatronics (since Afton probably realised they were out to get him). When the spirits, now out of the suits thanks to Afton, went to confront him, he tried to hide in Springtrap, but the springlocks failed and killed him.
Ok, I messed around with golden Freddy audios and the first I couldn't figure out, and the last one is pretty clear, but the one I could really make out was the second one was and this is what I heard " this is were fantasy and fun have your throat" that's what I heard by changing tempo, volume and pitch and that was what I came up with
If we are playing as Michael the "I always come back" (an Afton voice line) makes a lot of sense. William doesn't know that Michael didn't lead him to the trap and that it was just Henry pulling strings. William comes back to "get revenge" on Michael for betraying him.
SqawkyPig Then, Michael have just "killed" one kid, and he's getting punished. But not William? It's like beating down to death a kid for taking candy in the kitchen without permission, but letting just go a dangerous criminal. :/
DeadlyMoon7 Steam Michael was getting in the way of the Puppet's ordeals (Who was avenging the person controlling everything (of whom I personally think is Fredbear)). Of course there are issues with all theories, it's near impossible for even the creator to get everything correct (we've had retcons in the past) and I mainly wanted to provide another aspect to everything.
William Acton's character is getting really deep! I really agree with these theories. The one where William Afton might be collecting 'parts' from children to put his child back together is really scary, too. Though, extremely creepy, I wouldn't want to imagine all of this gore and events in a realistic game or movie scenario.
I think William is trying to bring back his son he says to him "I will put you back together" so he is experiying kids by killing them try to figure how to poseste the animantornic with souls "Sorry for my bad English "
Freddy vs Foxy and Mangle might actually be William vs Micheal And Henry cause Micheal went from location to location and came out alive trying to free the animatronics.. thus embarrassing William? but thats just a wild thought
Alright boiz, theory time. So I believe that BV is Mike and that he was actually friends with the main 5 kids as evidenced by the "Do you miss them?" in the logbook. Another reason that could point to Mike's friendship with the children is that say Mike has a playdate with his friends. William could've easily played the 'cool dad' to gain the trust of Mike's friends. The final piece (heheh) of the puzzle is proved by none other than *drumroll please* Candy. Stinkin. Cadet After Mike's accident as the bite of 83, William was devastated and used his knowledge of biology to kill the 5 children and piece *5* things into *1* *5 Children, into one Child: Mike*
and maybe the souls are split in half . half in the animatronics and half in u the one u play with (mike after rebirth) and thats why the animatronics attack u and ur dad (william) doesnt want u to go to the restaurant
Toy chica mentions that she is going to find someone that is right for her. In FredBears message he says that he will find I suit that’s right for you, or something along those lines. This could also refer to that William hasn’t found a child that’s right for him so FredBear is fed up with him killing so many victims so he’s chooses for him. Also when you get killed by FredBear in UCN he laughs at you mocking what William says.
I think that the children he killed are Charlie (Henry's daughter), killed before the cutscenes, Foxy, Bonnie, Chica , Freddy and Mangle (Mangle being the girl in Fruity Maze,). I also have a theory on Mangle. I think that Mangle is not only possessed by the blonde girl, but also by her dog! That would explain why Mangle has two heads (one smaller for the dog, and one bigger for the girl)
Maybe this was before William figured out how to get the souls in the animatronics? The "one thing that could possibly go wrong" is the souls not sticking. He keeps killing to figure out how things work.
BILL CIPHER or..... Maybe he was killing kids to put Mike back together THEN suddenly gets addicted to killing.... no heart....an empty tomb-Ballora IDK I’m probs wrong Ill go hide under a rock and start to starve to death....
RegentGamerYT According to FNAF 6's insanity ending, Henry says that he helped William, and feels guilt for it. My guess is that someone died. I'm assuming it is William's wife, as she never appears in the game. And so, he wanted to experiment with Remnant, to bring her back to life. He started making some Animatronics that could capture children to experiment on them, including Ballora, which he made inspired by his Wife. However, it wasn't good enough yet, and he asked help from the master animatronic-maker, Henry. He obviously refused, due to ethical reasons, so, William decided to "convince" him to join, by killing his daughter. So, since Henry had now lost his daughter aswell, he decides to help William, as he can bring his own daughter back. Henry makes Baby, the Scooper, and helps William with his experiments, as they create Circus Baby's Pizza World to attract children, so he could capture and experiment on them. However, it backfired miserably, as William's own daughter, Elizabeth, got caught and killed by Baby. After that, William decided to scrap CBPW, with the excuse of a "gas leak", and store Baby, Ballora, and the Funtimes in a secret underground facility. The crying child (whom I'm gonna call Cassidy Afton for several reasons) sees that event, and becomes traumatized of the place, and especially, the Animatronics. We can assume the events of FNAF 4 happen after this, due to 2 reasons. 1 - The empty girl room in FNAF 4. 2 - The destroyed Funtime Foxy toy in that same room. After all, it was based on part of a restaurant that cost the life of a family member, so who would want that toy around? It's practically a reminder of her death. Then, I'm not quite sure where to go from here. The nightmares in FNAF 4 can belong to Cassidy, after the trauma he got from seeing his sister murdered. Oooorrrrr, it could belong to Michael AFTER he accidentally killed his brother, being a guilt-induced thing and all. And then, William has lost 2 children to Animatronics at this point, therefore, sick of it, he decides to start killing them himself. He sees a girl's dog getting run over, and decides to experiment with the dog, using an unused prototype of Funtime Foxy. It was successful, and thus, Mangle was born. Afton dressed up in the Spring-Bonnie suit, and used the reborn dog to lure the owner, Susie, and kill her, making her the first victim of William's Serial Killer career. Meanwhile, some other Remnant experiments started to work out inside the Sister Location, as Baby appears to have Elizabeth back, and also Ballora displays to have become more sentient than before. William then asks Michael to go investigate, and so he goes, starting Sister Location. Michael gets scooped, Ennard goes inside of him, his body begins to rot, so they get out, but Michael still survives due to Remnant and the Plot Magic, and with the knowledge of what his father was actually doing, he decides to go and put a stop to it. William keeps killing kids, now with barely a reason anymore, and shoving the body into the Animatronics, while the Puppet brings them back to life. Tl;dr, that's what I belive the Purple Guy's origin story and motives to be.
yeah i think that too. with the theory that william afton was going to put michael (in this theory michael is crying child) back together i think that william killed the kids to work out how to make remnants into animatronics but got addicted to it
I figured his wife died in childbirth or something, hence his disdain for children and even his own kids, though there is minimal evidence for any of that.
“Due to a broken heart” I reckon this means in a way where, since Michael killed the crying child (on accident) maybe Williams heart is broken in a way where his on son killed another of his sons?
The Fourth Closet helps out solve most of our questions like who Cassidy really is, the "Broken Heart", what does "put then back together" mean, what William's motives are.
Roxo 9000 big brain maybe? That's why hes really smart? Idk just a guess. Or maybe because he is messed up and the metal expanded and stuff. Like i said its a guess. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
“Everything has a meaning in this game” Guard: **breaths-** Everyone: WRITE THAT DOWN! WRITE THAT DOWN!! Guard: I just wanted to- Everyone: HE SAID SOMETHING! WRITE THAT DOWN!!
How are you the- Everyone: WRITE THAT DOWN THIS MEANS TOY FREDDY IS SECRETLY FREDDY IN AN ALTERNATE DIMENSION AND HE HAS A GUN! GUARD: WHAT HOW!? EVERYONE: WRITE THAT DOWN!
@teen gohan Mangle doesn't have pale pink cheeks, it have rosy cheeks. Mangle doesn't have eyebrows. Mangle doesn't have pale pink lipstick, it have rosy lipstick. The Foxy in the cutscene is FT.Foxy.
What if Afton is intending to find a “perfect subject”? That would explain the way that Toy Chica keeps disregarding the people she picks up, and then moves on, saying that it wasn’t meant to be. AFton might be failing in his experiments, or perhaps he’s seeking something greater.
I wonder if he kept "trophies" from the kids he killed and put them in the unlockable box. Just a thought since Chica had pieces of her victims in her backpack.
There are also enough line about Mangle begging to get from the ceiling to go to the toilet or Foxy being unable to sleep without his blanket if I remember correctly.
I get the feeling william was only after immortality, I believe he killed the kids as an experiment, maybe trying to use their remnant to keep himself alive and after being spring locked he discovered that he had succeeded.
The question is... "How did he think of immortality, and how did he find remnant? He just couldn't have gone and killed the kids to make remnant if he wouldn't have seen someone (or someTHING) come to life after dying, right..?"
the only thing that could possible go wrong is when william get caught by the puppet since it was the first victim and never see in cutscene toy chica tells about foxy
For the Freddy and Foxy scenario, maybe it's representing Henry trying to catch William in the process, being suspicious of what he's doing. Though, he never really gets to him. Since we know William is very manipulative and lies straight to other's faces with ease, Henry may not know what's going on until it's too late. But that raises the question, Is Henry really still alive/possessing something in Pizzeria Simulator, or is he just a recording with programming to set fire to the facility once they are all together?
I feel like the Freddy vs Foxy cutscene is a representation of crying child vs his brother when their sister was alive, and mangle is the sister, and the hole thing was a kids game, that would show their relationship went of the rails when their sis died, and it could explain the silly punishments, and Elizabeth's (mangle's) care free personality can explain why she would be so invested in playing with baby.
When it says "only one thing could go wrong" i think it is referring to the ghosts attacking william and forcing him into the spring locked suit where he dies in fnaf 3
What I realised is that in the toy chica cutscenes at the end she always says they will be mine by the end of the day but in the last one she says they will be with my for eternity
In regards to the Freddy vs Foxy cutscene, I feel that those scenes represent the relationship between the sibling children of the Afton household. The main reason I think this is firstly because of the connection between the characters of the samurai scenes, Freddy, Foxy, and Mangle and the children as seen in the plushes in the Afton house in FNAF 4 and secondly because the punishments themselves in the samurai scenes are super pedestrian; doing laundry, making food, etc. Seems like something an older brother would force the younger one to do. The samurai scenes could represent the buildup of punishments or dares between the brothers that led to the final one of "put your head in the Fredbear animatronic" that led to the crying child's death.
The bite victim and and Baby werent victims. I think the 6 we see are Marionette, Golden Freddy, Freddy, Bonnie, Chica, and Foxy. The last one i think is Mangle because she is the only toy animatronic/other animatronic that is present during the whole Fredbear/FNAF4/Sister Location fiasco. Why is Mangle in the FNAF 4 Afton house in Elizabeths room years before the rest of the toy animatronics are made. Because he was an early victim: he was Chicas dog. Mattpat talked about this as Foxy calls Mangle a dog in the Japanese subtitles, Mangles audio translated is him having to pee (things dogs do very often). He also walks on all fours, and its hard to determine the gender of a dog, and hes all mangled like the dog from Fruity Maze.
Swagadone wether it was Scott's intentions or not, the toy animatronics dont exist when we see the full grown mangle animatronic in the FNAF 4 house. The dream toy animatronics are 3 little plushies a girl has whilst mangle is an actual robot
Plus that thing... Chica, I can't remember which one (i think withered one), in ucn, after jumpscare tells you that: "I was the first. I've seen everything." and "I have seen him. The one you shouldn't have killed"
Baby could be considered a victim, killed by the animatronic made to do such horrible things. The teens or big kids wear the masks as they throw that child into Freddy's mouth. I kinda figured that the whole group of kids were crazy.
The one he should not of killed (Golden Freddy) is the thing that goes wrong! Also his first victim could be Golden Freddy instead (But that may not be the case) EDIT (People are informing me the charlie was the first victim 100%, so i guess that busts that last part)
Shouldn’t even be called a theory but it could be something : The intermissions could represent the children acting or playing. What I mean is that in the birthday mini game there are children sitting down and eating cake. It could suggest the kids ‘playing’ if you know what I mean.
Just a thought- not saying this is definite. Do the parts of the animatronics in Toy Chica's backpack represent life remnant? We all know that when the kids are killed, their life remnant goes into the suits. When Toy Chica kills the other characters, their parts go into her backpack. Just an idea. Good video btw :D
I believe it makes a lot more sense to be playing as William. A line roughly states no matter how many time "THEY" burn us I won't let you leave." To my knowledge Henry and Michael would be the they refenced here. I also don't find it terribly significant spring/scrap trap is in the game. I don't find it hard to believe William would have been separated from his animatronic once delivered to his personal hell, especially when you consider it's being orchestrated by one of his victims. He flees into that suit for protection when he is first confronted by the ghost children and furthermore used those suits to abduct/abuse those children in the first place but now they call him powerless, and I think much of that power lay in the terror he caused in and with his suit. I think facing spring trap/scrap is just another part of being forced to reckon with the sins he's committed, but moreover being haunted by himself, his vicious murderous intent, still trapped in the suit, while he gets to experience not only the children's revenge, but what it actually felt like to be a powerless child against himself, quite literally. That said I also don't find it hard to believe that the nightmare anis would appear either. I personally believed that they were either real all along or that if he was hallucinating it was based off of real animitronics William created with the intention of tormenting the child we play as in (insert correct fnaf game number here). With sister location so close he could have quite easily been releasing them at night to torment the boy like the mention of others that bury themselves during the day? Idk, it's all speculation for me and I'm not able to reference each game specifically but I think explaining simple things like springtrap and nightmare anis is a lot easier to do than why in the world of all people Michael would be the player here. Whether you assume he is the crying child(why would he be tormented then?) or the reason the crying child was bitten, and/or the reason he died, he may have been an asshole to his brother but I think it's apparent he never wanted him to get hurt, and after trying to right his father's wrongs I don't believe any of the animitronics would have reason to speak to him in the manner they speak to the player. The punishment just really doesn't fit the crime for me in any scenario Michael is left to this hell rather than William.
“Let me put you back together, then take you apart all over again.” Let’s think about that voice line. Maybe Scott is telling us to start over with our theories? Maybe we missed a very minuscule detail that would’ve taken the whole theory in another direction...
If you look at the bag of toy chica , you can see puppet's mask, funtime foxy's eye, foxy's hook, wolf's hand, pigpatch and toy bonnie's ear, and freddy's top hat.
I think that William Afton is killing kids and take their specific parts, which is the face, eye, 2 hands, ears, and a hat. And try to put all together to his dead son. And that one could possibly go wrong is that putting all back together to bring his son back.
Everyone like this so it can be seen
Everyday with Master Jo ew lol. You could be right
U r rigth
oh shoot u might be right. Here is another theory. The 7 people that chica killed might also mean the games. Think of it, scott has made 7 games. FNAF 1,2,3,4, Sister location, Pizzeria Simulator and Ultimate custom night. Maybe he is still not satisfied. I think this represents that the FNAF Games are still not over.
Edit: Why would he Need a Top Hat To put his son together?
That would make sense
Dawko: This is a story about afton killing kids and-
Ad: this is how to keep your kids safe and cool this summer.
I legit fell of my chair
Underated
Ironic.
Why did I just here Dawko say this right as I read the comment lol
You havnt met my dad yet have you?
"William Afton is Toy Chica. No, not in the lore, it's a metaphor"
Me: they had us in the first half not gonna lie
Lmao
I love your profile picture
@@lvbboi9 i love it too
Just imagine this killer dressed like Toy Chica!
Jinx198 everyone's gonna regret making those toy chica fan arts
The one thing that could go wrong is a springlock failure.
Trent B AH! THAT KINDA MAKES SENSE.
Yeah I think that also
I thought 'bout that Too, that means you are right, cuz i thought that Too.
Charlie Fnafgirl k
Yea...
A kid is alone.
William Afton: *it's free real estate*
Im not depressed anymore cause of that thanks
Lmao the suits are free real estate
*oh...that's just...*
more fnaf or leon related free real estate
a florida citizen
leon: its free real estate
a corpse
oblivion: its free real estate
lily tems
fred bear suit: its free real estate
spring trap burned
also oblivion: ITS FREE REAL ESTATE
@Jedi Of Math 369 true
SCOTT DOESNT DO JOKES
-Matpat
... they why did he make pig patch voice. The músic in the end xD
Or any of his early “releases” that are actually old games he made
UltimateLegendLugia doesn't*
Thats true but mr hippo
UltimateLegendLugia "Coincidence"*
I have a theory. Toy Chica saying “there is something that could go wrong” she is referring to William Afton’s spring lock suit. For example, in the ending in fnaf 3, some thing ‘went wrong’ with the suit (due to the safe room being moist because of rain). Not sure, but it seems logical
It’s better than anything else I could think of.
maybe it's the fact of the animatronics turning on him, or it could even be henry or the police catching him killing the children
2:40 the part all of you came for
Thank you, I couldn't find that timestamp anywhere-
Ty
Yes
Thx bro i want it
Yesss, this is the best part of this video
Anyone else notice that the field with the tree that toy chica hangs out at in the last cutscene looks similar to the field with the child graves at the end of fnaf6??
Tired Crocodile hmm
Yeah, I was thinking the same
yup
wooosh
Lol i have no clue
No. This is not an r/woosh. Im just saying because i havnt heard anyone discuss this yet
“Or maybe it doesn’t mean anything at all... maybe it doesn’t mean anything at all.” -Mr. Hippo
Beat me to it lol
What about "not every story has to have significance"?
Amazing
True
How come dawko couldn't voice actress for toy chica in High school?
TheGreenBlobGaming what?
TheGreenBlobGaming I think Scott already had someone available.
HA!😂 that would be hilarious
That was incredible! LOL
Because he would scare the victims away lol
Two things Dawko missed:
1. Every day Chica specifically goes on about a specific part of them, like Freddys hat on the first day, and then that aspect is what she keeps from them. And when she thought about Freddy she said he'll be MINE and said mine a lot, I think Chica is enamored with an aspect of them instead of the whole thing, she goes after them for the part of them she likes that is why she keeps that part. She wants their stuff, not them. That is why she keeps that part of them. Another thing is on the last day she goes after the pig but oddly can't find a part of him she likes, she thinks but tgen gives up and say "Looks aren't everything" so I think at this point she is now addicted to killing rather than the end result.
What this means is Scott is trying to tell us we misunderstood William, when he said "I will put you back together" he did not mean he was going to put his son back together, he meant he was going to replace him with another built child. So he kills kids who have a body part like an eye he either likes or think looks like his son then stores it to create a new child, you see since William built the animatronics he may have decided he think he can also build a child. But soon enough he begins to kill not to rebuild his kud but because he is now addicted to killing, this is why Chica progressively gets crazier and decides to kill the final character in the cutscenes without liking any part of him and spends no time talking about what she likes about him like the others, instead going straight to her plan to kill him which is now much longer than any of her other plans. She/William now kills for the thrill of killing instead of for a different purpose.
2. Chica seems specifically obsessed with bringing them to her house. You think if she was planning to make them become her boyfriend she would instead be focused on confessing to them or charming them, but no Chica always specifically plans the end result to be them at her house. This and the fact she loves saying "Mine" and "Forever" a lot may mean she intends to kill them and keep them from the beginning, she has no plans to make them her boyfriend. A lot if people aasumes she wants to get together with them or that when she says only one thing can go wrong she means getting rejected but I think this is wrong, I think she only wishes to kill and keep them. Perhaps aftee she kills them she realizes they are no longer what they once were so she ends up repeating the cycle is what I originally thought, but considering how she seems only obsessed with her plan to get the pig on the last day I think she actually is in love with killing, but she doesn't realize that so she keeps trying to convince herself she Is in love with the person in order to excuse what she does.
That is just my theories and what I think Dawko missed, nothing more.
3- toy chica is william afton
"replace him with another built child"
*matpat's sb theorizing intensifies*
Um I'm not gonna read that my mind is too lazy
Bruh
How u typed all that without ur fingers falling off?
@@aurobindarath774 AHAHAH FRRR
*ThEre'S onLY OnE THinG ThaT CouLD PoSsiBLy gO wRoNG*
Yes: A Team Fortress 2 dub.
OH NO IT ALL WENT WRONG!!
Fox Ella and would be *DeMoItIzATiOn*
*oH SoRrY i HaVe A gIrLfRiEnD*
...Ye could get exposed! THAT'S WHAT COULD GO WRONG! XD
"He's killing them and doing stuff with them..."
I didn't know it was THAT kind of anime!
Cole Costie hentaihaven new tag?
Cole Costie I watch it for the plot
Uh oh, is that "demonotised" I hear?
Yandere Chica
Cole Costie OOF
You did such a good feminine voice for Chica 😂
KingRamen1116 dawko lord
Ikr it's perfect.
agreed that was actually good. xD
One word
Perfect.
when was it lol
"Only thing could go wrong." maybe that relates to "The one you shouldn't have killed."
also maybe " I just know that there's a guy who's right for me" relates to Fredbears decoded jumpscare line "Lets find a suit that's right for you."
Dude I literally think about this all the time thank you for saying it
Broke in through a window? Like the FNAF Midnight Motorist minigame?
Archer Party LOOKSKSKSNSJDNNS YOU’RE ON TO SOMETHING
Archer Party uh the kid from midnight motorist broke OUT of the house through a window
Lilly Phillips Then why is there no glass outside? If he broke out, glass would be on the outside, not inside.
How do you know that there's glass INSIDE when you can't see/get INSIDE? Maybe Scott is still a troll.
@@igi1225 Fair point.
Hold up!
I don't believe Henry's daughter was the first victim but the most "significant." One of Withered Chica's voice lines specifically says "I was the first. I have seen everything," implying that Susie was Afton's first victim. They really hammered it in FNAF6 where one of the mini-games clearly illustrates how Afton lured Susie to be killed. Now in the Chica High School intermissions, the second cutscene she states "I told him someone ran over his dog in front of my house;' a clear reference to the events prior to Susie's murder.
My theory is, Susie along with Gabriel, Fritz and Jeremy were the original 4 victims killed and stuffed into animatronics (as a means of hiding the evidence). Henry's daughter was the fifth, but she ends up possessing the puppet and gained supernatural powers to "give life" to the other four. Thus the "Missing Children Incident" came to be.
Will Wesley when W.Chica said that? I will search it.
Good theory dude!
Will Wesley Dawko said that the reason Henry went crazy is because his son (bite victim) got killed first so shouldn’t Henry’s daughter get kill after?
Don't you mean "Afton's" son?
Will Wesley yes the bite victim
Fnaf world
Fredbear : where it all began
For the "one thing that can go wrong" I think it is Puppet and the children getting revenge.
I think it's the spring locks failing
OR if we take he line literally it's that the one thing that could go wrong is the character rejecting toy chica
@@kevinwetherell1748 probably
Or one of the kids fake being dead and tell the police
@@abbymorral6050 no does not match the lour
I think so
anyone ever thought that maybe the novels and games have a SPLIT timeline? instead of the being to completely different universes, what if there is one event that makes them diverge, I would think that event is in 1995 being when Charlie returns to Hurricane, maybe in the novel timeline, she chooses to investigate the pizzeria, and this triggers the present day novel events, but in the game timeline, she does not investigate, and this causes Afton to destroy the animatronics causing him to be sealed in Springtrap, years later he is found and FNAF 3, and 6 happen, and perhaps SL takes place after FNAF 3 flashbacks, explaining the SL Animatronics appearing in Novel 3. Michael just diddn't show up, or maybe he did and William took care of him.
WHY IS THERE SO MUCH READING well gotta read all this ill be back in 7 years
@masakasama This right here makes sense.
Or
"Maybe it doesn't mean anything at all, maybe it doesn't mean anything at all..."
~Mr.Hippo
A fellow Republic Commando!
*_Hello there_*
RC-7593 Republic Commando! You are a bold one.
No...it all is too much of a coincidence. (I know it’s a joke)
Mr Hippo is like a troll though x3
Dawko, you theorized William's motives for killing children is because he's lost his daughter. But she was killed by baby, and baby was created for luring and killing kids (when he was creating baby, he hadn't lost any children yet, since it's presumed Elizabeth's death happened before crying child's).
Mr. Jay I don't think there is any proof she died before, Dawko assumed it just because her bed was empty in the FNAF 4 minigame, and it could be any different reason
I think "there's only one thing that could go wrong" is referencing FNaF 3. When the spirits come to haunt him.
William Afton: *laughs in suit, breathes a little too hard*
Springlock Suit: *”You have chosen death”*
The Toy Chica cutscenes secretly being about William Afton killing kids is brilliant. She stuffs the remains of her victims into her bag, just like William stuffs the children's remains into suits.
Dawko please read this:
The main character depicted is Toy Chica the oddest of the toy animatronics because
A. Only one to offer food (the cupcakes)
B. Beak falls off
After Henry’s daughter is killed don’t you think that he would be banned from going in there? Well this answers how William lured the children out of the building. Toy Chica was tampered with to lure children outside using treats or telling them something is happening outside.
Chica’s beak falls off because she’s been tampered with.
That’s why in the fruit maze mini game the words go between yellow and purple. Yellow represents what Chica is literally saying to the kids. And why is the Twisted wolf important? The only other time a twisted wolf is referenced is that pile of dirt in the Midnight racer mini game in that game you also go to JR’s and a guard tells you “you shouldn’t be here.”
These two tell you that Afton has already killed the wolf kid and been caught doing so and now there’s a posted guard and William isn’t even allowed to be out-front of the building.
So that’s why at the end of the Midnight motorist William just says “He’s ran off to that place again.” The kid isn’t going there because he really loves Fazbears but because it’s a safe place from his father.
Nice
Good ideas and thoughts mate!
LegoZeke ! It’s not Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza it’s Fredbear’s Family Diner that the CC younger son of William Afton ran off to
I thought toy chica cutscene was the aftermath of Scott getting Drunk,
But I was VERY WRONG....in a way
I think when she says "there is only one thing that could go wrong" maybe it just implies that William is very good at planning and thinks out every scenario so he is always aware that something could always go wrong
There's only one thing that could.possibly go wrong - getting his own children killed. What could've gone wrong already went wrong
Junior
No, because that happened before.
WHO LET HIM HAVE CHILDREN AT FIRST PLACE
'There's only one thing that could possibly go wrong'
Maybe getting springlocked in the process of luring the children??
There’s only one thing that could go wrong. Maybe she’s worried about that only one the kids know how to fight and rekt her.
raladiks games Chica is not Michael Afton.
Mr. Jay
Now that i think about it, what was William doing the night he got springlocked? No one was killed that night, he was just...there
BILL CIPHER He went back to one of the abandoned facilities to dismantle the haunted animatronics (since Afton probably realised they were out to get him). When the spirits, now out of the suits thanks to Afton, went to confront him, he tried to hide in Springtrap, but the springlocks failed and killed him.
??????
The one thing that can go wrong could be the spring locks going off because William Afton used the springbonnie to kill the kids
Genius
Exotic Rater Toy Chica represents William Afton in Springbonnie suit maybe....
Exotic Rater, ikr I believe that too!!!
Exotic Rater thought the exact same
Ok, I messed around with golden Freddy audios and the first I couldn't figure out, and the last one is pretty clear, but the one I could really make out was the second one was and this is what I heard " this is were fantasy and fun have your throat" that's what I heard by changing tempo, volume and pitch and that was what I came up with
Sam The Lion wow nice sarcasm 😒
DankDarkEclipse “There’s more fantasy and fun where I came from.”
Goodin48 ?
DankDarkEclipse Sorry, that was what G-Freddy said, I think. 😅
More like "There is more fantasy and fun where I come from"
If we are playing as Michael the "I always come back" (an Afton voice line) makes a lot of sense. William doesn't know that Michael didn't lead him to the trap and that it was just Henry pulling strings. William comes back to "get revenge" on Michael for betraying him.
cool kid Re-used for the same person, perhaps? A memory he shares with the Animatronic
SqawkyPig Then, Michael have just "killed" one kid, and he's getting punished. But not William?
It's like beating down to death a kid for taking candy in the kitchen without permission, but letting just go a dangerous criminal. :/
DeadlyMoon7 Steam Michael was getting in the way of the Puppet's ordeals (Who was avenging the person controlling everything (of whom I personally think is Fredbear)). Of course there are issues with all theories, it's near impossible for even the creator to get everything correct (we've had retcons in the past) and I mainly wanted to provide another aspect to everything.
SqawkyPig Meh.
I have the ultimate theory. Mike/William Afton is being punished by golden freddy because he didnt thank the bus driver
george george *conspiracy 100*
OMG!!! YOU JUST SOLVED FNAF!!!
🅱️
But hey that's just a fact a FNAF fact thanks for reading.
yes
William Acton's character is getting really deep! I really agree with these theories. The one where William Afton might be collecting 'parts' from children to put his child back together is really scary, too. Though, extremely creepy, I wouldn't want to imagine all of this gore and events in a realistic game or movie scenario.
“ everything has a meaning in this game “
Me: * clicks on the poster to hear the honk
THE POSTER IS WILLIAM AFTON
@@noahspivey195 I mean you make him sound bad now lmafo
Find a guy that’s right for her that sound like what fredbear says when he says let’s find a suit that’s right for you.
Agreed
Exactly
Also cool icon
And fredbear says tomorrow is another day!
Dawko: everything matters in this game
Me: even exotic butter?
*E V E R Y T H I N G*
I KNOW THE TRUE VILLAIN
THE PICKLES
@@justalad1870 :O
I think William is trying to bring back his son he says to him "I will put you back together" so he is experiying kids by killing them try to figure how to poseste the animantornic with souls
"Sorry for my bad English "
I dont think so.
He murdered kids before his Son died
Hmmmmmm I wonder who that guy from jojos name is I think it’s GIORNO GIOVANNA
That guy from giogio Vento Aureo
I also think that he bacome a psycopath because his son or dauther died orrrr he did it cause he really obsesed with biology
6:15 I reckon that that is the spirits wanting revenge.
Freddy vs Foxy and Mangle might actually be William vs Micheal And Henry cause Micheal went from location to location and came out alive trying to free the animatronics.. thus embarrassing William? but thats just a wild thought
Melomis i like that theory
Melomis That theory could be true.
Melomis
William: Foxy
Michael: Freddy
Freddy 480 the reverse because mike and henry were teaming up against William, so that means that Mike and Henry could essentially be foxy and mangle
That...actually makes sense
Alright boiz, theory time.
So I believe that BV is Mike and that he was actually friends with the main 5 kids as evidenced by the "Do you miss them?" in the logbook. Another reason that could point to Mike's friendship with the children is that say Mike has a playdate with his friends. William could've easily played the 'cool dad' to gain the trust of Mike's friends. The final piece (heheh) of the puzzle is proved by none other than
*drumroll please*
Candy. Stinkin. Cadet
After Mike's accident as the bite of 83, William was devastated and used his knowledge of biology to kill the 5 children and piece *5* things into *1*
*5 Children, into one Child: Mike*
^_^ we found another fnaf theorist for matpat to rival
nice dude
and maybe the souls are split in half .
half in the animatronics and half in u the one u play with (mike after rebirth) and thats why the animatronics attack u and ur dad (william) doesnt want u to go to the restaurant
One big detail. Fnaf 2 happens 5 years after fnaf 4
Stinkyink and that's why Mike lived at the end of SL, because he had already died and had already been remade.
Always cheers me up when I see another new video from Dawko in my recommendations. :)
Sandwichingaround You're really reaching for likes aren't you
Same mate
Ding_Us ?
@@SoThisExists shut up he just likes dawko and wants to tell him
Findominator Right. Not attention seeking at all. Got it.
*me drinking grape juice*
6:00 (purple guy shows up when i finished grape juice)
William Afton:how dare you
All i can imagine is her jumping into a characters yard singing Dead Girl Walking
Nice heathers reference
Heathers!! Yes!!
Was not expecting Heathers on a FNAF video
Spinny Boi Nation yes yes yes yes
Toy chica mentions that she is going to find someone that is right for her. In FredBears message he says that he will find I suit that’s right for you, or something along those lines. This could also refer to that William hasn’t found a child that’s right for him so FredBear is fed up with him killing so many victims so he’s chooses for him. Also when you get killed by FredBear in UCN he laughs at you mocking what William says.
Treyvon J Lavell 🤔 hmm your right
I think that the children he killed are Charlie (Henry's daughter), killed before the cutscenes, Foxy, Bonnie, Chica , Freddy and Mangle (Mangle being the girl in Fruity Maze,).
I also have a theory on Mangle. I think that Mangle is not only possessed by the blonde girl, but also by her dog! That would explain why Mangle has two heads (one smaller for the dog, and one bigger for the girl)
Broken Unicorn good theorie
Maybe this was before William figured out how to get the souls in the animatronics? The "one thing that could possibly go wrong" is the souls not sticking. He keeps killing to figure out how things work.
I know this is random but... Is that a glowing llama behind you?? I LOVE IT!
No, it was a doggo.
Rainboow Cutie Gamer nope it's really a Llama
What if William is killing kids for the remnant to put his son back together?
RegentGamerYT
I think he just enjoys it. In a disturbing kind of way.
BILL CIPHER or.....
Maybe he was killing kids to put Mike back together THEN suddenly gets addicted to killing.... no heart....an empty tomb-Ballora
IDK I’m probs wrong
Ill go hide under a rock and start to starve to death....
RegentGamerYT According to FNAF 6's insanity ending, Henry says that he helped William, and feels guilt for it. My guess is that someone died. I'm assuming it is William's wife, as she never appears in the game. And so, he wanted to experiment with Remnant, to bring her back to life. He started making some Animatronics that could capture children to experiment on them, including Ballora, which he made inspired by his Wife. However, it wasn't good enough yet, and he asked help from the master animatronic-maker, Henry. He obviously refused, due to ethical reasons, so, William decided to "convince" him to join, by killing his daughter. So, since Henry had now lost his daughter aswell, he decides to help William, as he can bring his own daughter back. Henry makes Baby, the Scooper, and helps William with his experiments, as they create Circus Baby's Pizza World to attract children, so he could capture and experiment on them. However, it backfired miserably, as William's own daughter, Elizabeth, got caught and killed by Baby. After that, William decided to scrap CBPW, with the excuse of a "gas leak", and store Baby, Ballora, and the Funtimes in a secret underground facility. The crying child (whom I'm gonna call Cassidy Afton for several reasons) sees that event, and becomes traumatized of the place, and especially, the Animatronics. We can assume the events of FNAF 4 happen after this, due to 2 reasons. 1 - The empty girl room in FNAF 4. 2 - The destroyed Funtime Foxy toy in that same room. After all, it was based on part of a restaurant that cost the life of a family member, so who would want that toy around? It's practically a reminder of her death. Then, I'm not quite sure where to go from here. The nightmares in FNAF 4 can belong to Cassidy, after the trauma he got from seeing his sister murdered. Oooorrrrr, it could belong to Michael AFTER he accidentally killed his brother, being a guilt-induced thing and all. And then, William has lost 2 children to Animatronics at this point, therefore, sick of it, he decides to start killing them himself. He sees a girl's dog getting run over, and decides to experiment with the dog, using an unused prototype of Funtime Foxy. It was successful, and thus, Mangle was born. Afton dressed up in the Spring-Bonnie suit, and used the reborn dog to lure the owner, Susie, and kill her, making her the first victim of William's Serial Killer career. Meanwhile, some other Remnant experiments started to work out inside the Sister Location, as Baby appears to have Elizabeth back, and also Ballora displays to have become more sentient than before. William then asks Michael to go investigate, and so he goes, starting Sister Location. Michael gets scooped, Ennard goes inside of him, his body begins to rot, so they get out, but Michael still survives due to Remnant and the Plot Magic, and with the knowledge of what his father was actually doing, he decides to go and put a stop to it. William keeps killing kids, now with barely a reason anymore, and shoving the body into the Animatronics, while the Puppet brings them back to life. Tl;dr, that's what I belive the Purple Guy's origin story and motives to be.
LegoFan246 Damm that is an amazing theory.
yeah i think that too. with the theory that william afton was going to put michael (in this theory michael is crying child) back together i think that william killed the kids to work out how to make remnants into animatronics but got addicted to it
or... Maybe it doesn't mean anything at all. Maybe it doesn't mean anything at all..
Actually, that reminds me of one time I was at the park with Orville...
Have you ever mixed lemonade with iced tea? Oh it's really good, half lemonade half iced, oh you should try it, oh, but you can't because your dead.
Life goes on...well not for you, you're dead.
ItzShaden My friend, you have met a terrible, terrible demise. But, uh, y'know, I-I don't feel too bad about it.
No....
JUST *N O*
Dawko’s transformation to an American while trying to do a Toy Chica impression got me real good😂
I think the one thing that could go wrong was the puppet giving life to the animatronics.
I figured his wife died in childbirth or something, hence his disdain for children and even his own kids, though there is minimal evidence for any of that.
The Theorizer could also be a possible motivation for his experiments.
The Theorizer, hi theorizer! I watch your videos, mostly coraline ones
Well, I wasn't expecting to find you here, Theorizer.
One I watch all of your videos and two I agree with you
Ik the books aren't completely canon but I finished Fourth Closet and your point is further proved by it.
“Due to a broken heart” I reckon this means in a way where, since Michael killed the crying child (on accident) maybe Williams heart is broken in a way where his on son killed another of his sons?
The Fourth Closet helps out solve most of our questions like who Cassidy really is, the "Broken Heart", what does "put then back together" mean, what William's motives are.
I think the meaning of "There is only one big that could possibly go wrong" would be William accidentally triggering the sprinklock suit
sprinklock moment
its springlock
@@noahspivey195 typo from 3 years ago
Question for scott, why does scraptrap have such a big forehead
Roxo 9000 big brain maybe? That's why hes really smart? Idk just a guess. Or maybe because he is messed up and the metal expanded and stuff. Like i said its a guess. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Scraptrap = Jimmy Neutron in the alternate timeline where he became a homeless drug-addicted tramp
My question is why is it a different model.
Roxo 9000 Because of William's ugly big skull popping out.
A hidden unknown detail about the game is that scraptrap is actually Jack from jacksfilms.
Or as good ol’ Mr. Hippo says
“ maybe it doesn’t mean anything at all. Maybe it doesn’t mean anything at all.”
Yeah no
Dawko: The first victim was charlie from the books who possessed the puppet
Withered chica: "I WAS THE FIRST, I HAVE SEEN EVERYTHING!"
He told her he found her dog, then he killed her. I'm not sure what it means by everything, It's just a death line.
Quality theory of the day: tOy ChiCa wAs SecRetlY wIlLiaM aFtoN fRom ThE VerY bEgGinnIng
MMasterGG [GD] x
YOUR THE BEST YOU DESERVE A COOKIE DAWKO!!
RelaxedSmile76 you’re*
🍪
Great video and this is interesting. You have an awesome channel.
🌊🙎♂️take 🤷🏻♂️ by the 👋 lead 🤷🏻♂️ to the 🌅
ThAt
I HATED anime so much that I did not notices that
“Everything has a meaning in this game”
Guard: **breaths-**
Everyone: WRITE THAT DOWN! WRITE THAT DOWN!!
Guard: I just wanted to-
Everyone: HE SAID SOMETHING! WRITE THAT DOWN!!
Guard:let me ta- everyone: *WRITE THAT DOWN WRITE THAT DOWN*
How are you the-
Everyone: WRITE THAT DOWN THIS MEANS TOY FREDDY IS SECRETLY FREDDY IN AN ALTERNATE DIMENSION AND HE HAS A GUN!
GUARD: WHAT HOW!?
EVERYONE: WRITE THAT DOWN!
Guard: Can you plea-
Everyone: *WAIT, ARE YOU SAYING THAT WILLIAM ISN'T INSIDE OF THE SPRING TRAP SUIT AND ITS JUST HIS BROTHER INSIDE OF IT*
Did anyone else notice that chica was at old man consequences pond. Because of the reflection of the trees in the background
No O O F ?
Wtf do u mean oof
Oofs OOF
:(
He destroyed roblox in last video
OEUF
Toy Chica lures Funtime Foxy, not Mangle.
The "only thing that could go wrong" may be them haunting the animatronics.
Shayzis your right
doubt it since a part of mangle is in the bag
Shayzis
But that might be what he wants, so he can get there souls and bring back Michael afton, his son.
@teen gohan
Mangle doesn't have pale pink cheeks, it have rosy cheeks.
Mangle doesn't have eyebrows.
Mangle doesn't have pale pink lipstick, it have rosy lipstick.
The Foxy in the cutscene is FT.Foxy.
What if Afton is intending to find a “perfect subject”? That would explain the way that Toy Chica keeps disregarding the people she picks up, and then moves on, saying that it wasn’t meant to be. AFton might be failing in his experiments, or perhaps he’s seeking something greater.
I wonder if he kept "trophies" from the kids he killed and put them in the unlockable box. Just a thought since Chica had pieces of her victims in her backpack.
THAT MAKES 100% SENSE. MIND BLOWN
Ingo Sapphire Why would he keep limbs inside a box?
ÐαηΐεŁ328 DT not actual pieces of the children. A shoe or hat or even a ribbon, just something they had that he could keep.
What I’m more curious about is what Freddy and Foxy are really saying in their cutscene since the subtitles are different.
it's actually just as stupid and pretty pointless really
Shinobin333
No... someone in comments (not these) tranlated this and there was a line with five dead children...
There are also enough line about Mangle begging to get from the ceiling to go to the toilet or Foxy being unable to sleep without his blanket if I remember correctly.
Shinobin333 yes
6:08
Henry noticing perhaps and becoming a loose end to William
I get the feeling william was only after immortality, I believe he killed the kids as an experiment, maybe trying to use their remnant to keep himself alive and after being spring locked he discovered that he had succeeded.
The question is... "How did he think of immortality, and how did he find remnant? He just couldn't have gone and killed the kids to make remnant if he wouldn't have seen someone (or someTHING) come to life after dying, right..?"
the only thing that could possible go wrong is when william get caught by the puppet since it was the first victim and never see in cutscene toy chica tells about foxy
For the Freddy and Foxy scenario, maybe it's representing Henry trying to catch William in the process, being suspicious of what he's doing. Though, he never really gets to him. Since we know William is very manipulative and lies straight to other's faces with ease, Henry may not know what's going on until it's too late. But that raises the question, Is Henry really still alive/possessing something in Pizzeria Simulator, or is he just a recording with programming to set fire to the facility once they are all together?
he says "i am remaining as well, i am nearby." so i assume it's the real henry.
THANK YOU AGAIN!
I appreciate this SOOOO much. You don’t even know!
I feel like the Freddy vs Foxy cutscene is a representation of crying child vs his brother when their sister was alive, and mangle is the sister, and the hole thing was a kids game, that would show their relationship went of the rails when their sis died, and it could explain the silly punishments, and Elizabeth's (mangle's) care free personality can explain why she would be so invested in playing with baby.
I think its explaining how was Henry and William relation
There Is Only One Thing That Can Go Wrong - Spring-lock Failure During Luring A Child?
2:40 ToY ChiCa Is WiLlAm AfToN
👌 Chica.....
*(X) You're adopted*
Wwwwwsaaaaajhhh
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOUUUU
Oh its granny....
WAIT ITS GRANNY
Granny U fan of FNAF ???
maurello andretti the undead are usually friends.. granny looks like a zombie.. im counting her as one XD
When it says "only one thing could go wrong" i think it is referring to the ghosts attacking william and forcing him into the spring locked suit where he dies in fnaf 3
What I realised is that in the toy chica cutscenes at the end she always says they will be mine by the end of the day but in the last one she says they will be with my for eternity
Guys I think I just worked out who we play as in UCN!
Using code from Scott’s website, UCN and steam I found that we play as...
Dawko
N o i c e
Maybe, who knows :3
oh sUGAH
Dawkos nightmares and twisted theories of trying to solve the game
Either that or matpats, you heard it here first
Now we just need to wait for the interview and just DENY the whole story oof
In regards to the Freddy vs Foxy cutscene, I feel that those scenes represent the relationship between the sibling children of the Afton household. The main reason I think this is firstly because of the connection between the characters of the samurai scenes, Freddy, Foxy, and Mangle and the children as seen in the plushes in the Afton house in FNAF 4 and secondly because the punishments themselves in the samurai scenes are super pedestrian; doing laundry, making food, etc. Seems like something an older brother would force the younger one to do. The samurai scenes could represent the buildup of punishments or dares between the brothers that led to the final one of "put your head in the Fredbear animatronic" that led to the crying child's death.
The only thing that can go wrong- his son seeing him kill a kid
Brad Dawg well I think he saw baby kill his sister
The bite victim and and Baby werent victims. I think the 6 we see are Marionette, Golden Freddy, Freddy, Bonnie, Chica, and Foxy. The last one i think is Mangle because she is the only toy animatronic/other animatronic that is present during the whole Fredbear/FNAF4/Sister Location fiasco. Why is Mangle in the FNAF 4 Afton house in Elizabeths room years before the rest of the toy animatronics are made. Because he was an early victim: he was Chicas dog. Mattpat talked about this as Foxy calls Mangle a dog in the Japanese subtitles, Mangles audio translated is him having to pee (things dogs do very often). He also walks on all fours, and its hard to determine the gender of a dog, and hes all mangled like the dog from Fruity Maze.
Swagadone wether it was Scott's intentions or not, the toy animatronics dont exist when we see the full grown mangle animatronic in the FNAF 4 house. The dream toy animatronics are 3 little plushies a girl has whilst mangle is an actual robot
Zeeky Klenicki
i think the same because she kills the wolf at the dog story, dogs are basiccally tamed wolves.
Y did Scott use a girl voice for puppit
Plus that thing... Chica, I can't remember which one (i think withered one), in ucn, after jumpscare tells you that:
"I was the first. I've seen everything." and
"I have seen him. The one you shouldn't have killed"
Baby could be considered a victim, killed by the animatronic made to do such horrible things. The teens or big kids wear the masks as they throw that child into Freddy's mouth. I kinda figured that the whole group of kids were crazy.
The one he should not of killed (Golden Freddy) is the thing that goes wrong! Also his first victim could be Golden Freddy instead (But that may not be the case) EDIT (People are informing me the charlie was the first victim 100%, so i guess that busts that last part)
GladiatorGator Exactly what I thought!
lets upvote so dawco get to see this
If you think golden Freddy was the first victim you didn’t play FNAF 6 at all or even watched videos
6:08 perhaps Henry catching him, he will be a loose
End to William
Toy chica says that there's 1 thing that could go wrong means if William breathed on the springlocks in spring bonnie
Or the bite of 87'/83'
Or it could be William worrying about getting blood on the springlocks (because the moisture will cause them to come lose)
Love these theory’s!
Shouldn’t even be called a theory but it could be something :
The intermissions could represent the children acting or playing. What I mean is that in the birthday mini game there are children sitting down and eating cake. It could suggest the kids ‘playing’ if you know what I mean.
edward
So kids think about murderes animtronics
Sounds awfully familiar
Maui The pug
edward Dude change your Picture
Change your prof pic
Ok, there’s a resemblance
In the FNAF 4 Minigames, after the kid gets jumpscared by Michael, The Fredbear plush says...
“Tommorow is another day.”
Just a thought- not saying this is definite.
Do the parts of the animatronics in Toy Chica's backpack represent life remnant? We all know that when the kids are killed, their life remnant goes into the suits. When Toy Chica kills the other characters, their parts go into her backpack.
Just an idea. Good video btw :D
Thats just a theory a diamond dust theory thanks for watching
Isn’t it obvious that in the cannon games, the cutscenes, and UCN, Toy Chica is a psychopath
Fair point
leon: sorry i am married with 2 kids
toy chica: *procceeds to kill oblivion, charles and may connors and then mutilates leon taking his jaw*
I believe it makes a lot more sense to be playing as William. A line roughly states no matter how many time "THEY" burn us I won't let you leave." To my knowledge Henry and Michael would be the they refenced here. I also don't find it terribly significant spring/scrap trap is in the game. I don't find it hard to believe William would have been separated from his animatronic once delivered to his personal hell, especially when you consider it's being orchestrated by one of his victims. He flees into that suit for protection when he is first confronted by the ghost children and furthermore used those suits to abduct/abuse those children in the first place but now they call him powerless, and I think much of that power lay in the terror he caused in and with his suit. I think facing spring trap/scrap is just another part of being forced to reckon with the sins he's committed, but moreover being haunted by himself, his vicious murderous intent, still trapped in the suit, while he gets to experience not only the children's revenge, but what it actually felt like to be a powerless child against himself, quite literally.
That said I also don't find it hard to believe that the nightmare anis would appear either. I personally believed that they were either real all along or that if he was hallucinating it was based off of real animitronics William created with the intention of tormenting the child we play as in (insert correct fnaf game number here).
With sister location so close he could have quite easily been releasing them at night to torment the boy like the mention of others that bury themselves during the day?
Idk, it's all speculation for me and I'm not able to reference each game specifically but I think explaining simple things like springtrap and nightmare anis is a lot easier to do than why in the world of all people Michael would be the player here. Whether you assume he is the crying child(why would he be tormented then?) or the reason the crying child was bitten, and/or the reason he died, he may have been an asshole to his brother but I think it's apparent he never wanted him to get hurt, and after trying to right his father's wrongs I don't believe any of the animitronics would have reason to speak to him in the manner they speak to the player. The punishment just really doesn't fit the crime for me in any scenario Michael is left to this hell rather than William.
If EVERY detail is significant, I believe the key to solving the lore is in Scott’s fnaf sister location troll game (the re-skinned sit and survive)
Scott: There's only one thing that could possibly go wrong with 50/20...
...Dawko
“Let me put you back together, then take you apart all over again.” Let’s think about that voice line. Maybe Scott is telling us to start over with our theories? Maybe we missed a very minuscule detail that would’ve taken the whole theory in another direction...
I think the thing the thing that could go wrong is his one of his relatives dying in an accident like baby and the crying child..
Thoughts??