I get that, the ship and its contents is indeed one of a kind. I’m sure there are videos about the ship in other languages. For the most part, she explained how the researchers work with the finds, how they are categorised and what they can learn from them, ranging from details of the life of a lowly boatsman all the way to international manufacturing and trade at the time. She also touched on the circumstances that have made a bit of a mess of the site (recovering the cannons in 1640, water movements throughout the centuries, and the recovery of the ship itself, but also that some materials have decomposed while other materials are more robust), and how they can compensate for it. A point was made to keep an open mind when drawing conclusions, exemplified by the female remains of “Beata”, whose clothes were originally thought to be men’s clothes because “man-of-war”… So there, almost caught up! What strikes me is that after hearing this, their methods seem logical and pragmatic. Almost as if I should have been able to figure it out myself. So thanks, Vasamuseet, for demystifying archeology a little bit for us!
Spændende. Hilsen Peter. København.
Спасибо огромное за вашу работу! Очень печально, что Россия в данном направлении очень сильно отстала.😍👍
Really wish I spoke Swedish
Try out the auto-translate subtitle on settings above :)
I get that, the ship and its contents is indeed one of a kind. I’m sure there are videos about the ship in other languages. For the most part, she explained how the researchers work with the finds, how they are categorised and what they can learn from them, ranging from details of the life of a lowly boatsman all the way to international manufacturing and trade at the time. She also touched on the circumstances that have made a bit of a mess of the site (recovering the cannons in 1640, water movements throughout the centuries, and the recovery of the ship itself, but also that some materials have decomposed while other materials are more robust), and how they can compensate for it. A point was made to keep an open mind when drawing conclusions, exemplified by the female remains of “Beata”, whose clothes were originally thought to be men’s clothes because “man-of-war”… So there, almost caught up! What strikes me is that after hearing this, their methods seem logical and pragmatic. Almost as if I should have been able to figure it out myself. So thanks, Vasamuseet, for demystifying archeology a little bit for us!
wow