Great video. Very informative as usual. frequency is one function I haven’t used much yet on my Fnirsi or Mr.Signal. I have a couple DC motor drivers on order that are PWM controlled so Ill be playing around with the Frequency functions in the coming days.
I would say that the Mr Signal unit has a bit more functionality and is more stable, it is however, more expensive than the Fnirsi. Thanks for watching!
@@rodrigocarvalho-nb3rj That's a very good question. For me, I use it professionally as a fault finding tool to verify what is working within reason and as a trouble shooting aid. It has quite a bit going for it in that respect. However, it isn't a full blown calibrator, so I would not use it if I am verifying sensors that for part of a process control. If they are just for indication, then it does seem to be good enough.
Great video. Very informative as usual. frequency is one function I haven’t used much yet on my Fnirsi or Mr.Signal. I have a couple DC motor drivers on order that are PWM controlled so Ill be playing around with the Frequency functions in the coming days.
Thanks. I don't really have much use for the frequency functions. The pulse count and Q-Pulse can be useful for some of the plant I deal with.
Really good research. Thank you
Thanks for watching!
Which one is the best?
I would say that the Mr Signal unit has a bit more functionality and is more stable, it is however, more expensive than the Fnirsi. Thanks for watching!
So, do you think it's worth purchasing the Mr Signal to use professionally?
@@rodrigocarvalho-nb3rj That's a very good question. For me, I use it professionally as a fault finding tool to verify what is working within reason and as a trouble shooting aid. It has quite a bit going for it in that respect. However, it isn't a full blown calibrator, so I would not use it if I am verifying sensors that for part of a process control. If they are just for indication, then it does seem to be good enough.