How does doing one's moral duty become autonomous and at the same time universalizability in the Kantian principle of "man as an end in himself/herself"?kindly relate it into course as a hospitality management
Well the officer in this scenario certainly weighs his options, one of which is taking the utilitarian approach. In the present case, it's helpful to think of utilitarianism as an "ends justifies the means" or "path of least resistance" choice, whereas the deontological approach is the more rigid, moralistic choice. From the utilitarian perspective, does the officer stand to gain or lose by speaking up? How about by saying nothing? From the deontological (read "moral") perspective, does it matter what's best for the officer?
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.77[2/2] "รับทราบ" แก๊งเพื่อนรัก 10 ปี ที่ไปไหนก็มีตำนาน!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ifc0ofD51B0/mqdefault.jpg)
Helpful for my ethics class
Wow! Incredible!
It take a woman to keep this world together and just.
It takes a good gay man.
@@classyguyVon lol
Dirty birdy
How does doing one's moral duty become autonomous and at the same time universalizability in the Kantian principle of "man as an end in himself/herself"?kindly relate it into course as a hospitality management
Transcript please.
Is that rule or act utilitarianism in action?
Well the officer in this scenario certainly weighs his options, one of which is taking the utilitarian approach. In the present case, it's helpful to think of utilitarianism as an "ends justifies the means" or "path of least resistance" choice, whereas the deontological approach is the more rigid, moralistic choice.
From the utilitarian perspective, does the officer stand to gain or lose by speaking up? How about by saying nothing?
From the deontological (read "moral") perspective, does it matter what's best for the officer?