KOREMATSU VERSUS US

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ก.ค. 2024
  • Seventy-five years ago, the Supreme Court issued one of its most controversial decisions--in Korematsu v. United States--upholding the conviction of Fred Korematsu who refused to report to an assembly center during the relocation and internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. What were the events that led up to the relocation of approximately 120,000 immigrants and citizens? How and why did the Court decide the way it did? Could it happen again?
    Three legal experts--Nadine Strossen, Dean Hashimoto, and Ken Masugi--discuss the events leading up to the relocation and internment, the relevant court cases, and the legacy of Korematsu.
    OFFICIAL SELECTION
    2020 Anthem Film Festival
    - Winner: Best Best Libertarian Ideals, Short Documentary
    00:00 - Opening
    02:07 - Title Card
    02:15 - Executive Order 9066
    04:49 - Relocation Camps
    06:59 - Camp conditions
    08:38 - Fred Korematsu
    10:00 - The Case Itself
    14:24 - Court Opinions
    17:26 - The Legal Significance
    19:38 - Fallout
    20:41 - Justice
    21:34 - Korematsu Today
    24:00 - End Credits
    * * * * * * * * * *
    Featuring:
    New York Law School Professor and former ACLU President Nadine Strossen:
    www.nyls.edu/faculty/faculty-...
    Boston College of Law Associate Professor Dean Hashimoto:
    www.bc.edu/bc-web/schools/law...
    Claremont Institute Senior Fellow Ken Masugi:
    www.claremont.org/crb/contrib...
    As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.
    * * * * * * * * * *
    Related Links & Differing Views:
    Oyez: Korematsu v. United States
    www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/...
    The National Park Service: A Brief History of Japanese American Relocation During World War II
    www.nps.gov/articles/historyi...
    UCLA Asian Pacific American Law Journal: The Legacy of Korematsu v. United States: A Dangerous Narrative Retold
    lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/cgi/...
    Law & Liberty: Lessons from the WW II Japanese Relocation
    www.lawliberty.org/2013/05/08...
    Relocation Reconsidered, Courtesy of Donald Trump
    www.claremont.org/crb/basicpa...
    TIME: The WWII Incarceration of Japanese Americans Stretched Beyond U.S. Borders
    time.com/5743555/wwii-incarce...
    B.C. Third World L.J.: Introduction: Praising With Faint Damnation --The Troubling Rehabilitation of Korematsu
    lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/cgi/v...
    Forbes: George Takei’s Family’s Japanese American Internment Nightmare
    www.forbes.com/sites/stuartan...
    New York Times: Rounding Up Americans
    www.nytimes.com/1984/01/01/bo...
    American Greatness: Concentration Camps, Again?
    amgreatness.com/2019/08/10/co...

ความคิดเห็น • 24

  • @judgeman4548
    @judgeman4548 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Who else is here because their teacher told them to watch the video?

  • @jianwei2009
    @jianwei2009 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    While I certainly heard about Korematsu countless times in constitutional and civil rights law courses, it's astonishing the concentration camps conditions are far worse than I have imagined.
    It's truly shocking what the government has done and how they even have the face to criticize China when its camps are far better than US's with education, entertainment, career skills training and good food.
    And plus, Korematsu v. US has never been overturned despite what some claims.

  • @Andrew-zw9fi
    @Andrew-zw9fi 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's frightening that this could happen again , and judges believe it's their duty to sacrifice individual civil constitutional rights for the sake of government convenience . It terrible that bureaucrats and judges can make executive orders and ruling to end constitution Civil rights of individuals . Judges , presidents and bureaucrats have already decided that people don't need civil rights and can be simple ruled null avoid ! The question is whom up holds the Bill of Rights, Constitution , from past history,judges , presidents, bureaucrats, and legislators do not !

  • @kenlandon6130
    @kenlandon6130 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    23:41 Yep, and like I said, the Federalist Society has lined up to defend it... many of the architects of detainee torture and military commissions were Federalist Society members....

  • @kenlandon6130
    @kenlandon6130 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    14:20 ??? How would that alone justify jailing someone...

  • @kenlandon6130
    @kenlandon6130 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    8:26 This from the people trying to destroy OSHA and weaken labor rights using the courts...

  • @kenlandon6130
    @kenlandon6130 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    23:05 And when that happens (it could be argued that it is), you can bet the Federalist Society will be lining up to defend it... they're willing to tolerate nativist insurrection in their ranks, why not internment?

  • @kenlandon6130
    @kenlandon6130 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lol if the Federalist Society types were around 77 years ago (counting from 2021), they would be praising Korematsu as "originalist" cause it would have served their purposes.

  • @BruthaVIII
    @BruthaVIII 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    2:54 - 3:25 is the basis, and logical reasoning, behind the relocation of the Japanese.

    • @JK20239
      @JK20239 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Then why didnt US charge korematsu with treason? It's a laughing matter...

  • @hayatharram2756
    @hayatharram2756 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are they refugees????

  • @pteronarcyscalifornica694
    @pteronarcyscalifornica694 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    SCOTUS ruled the relocation of Japanese during the war was lawful.

    • @JK20239
      @JK20239 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Is it? What crime did korematsu commit? Being Japanese american? Laughable

    • @pteronarcyscalifornica694
      @pteronarcyscalifornica694 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JK20239 Korematsu's crime was failure to obey a lawful military order during time of war.

    • @nathanli3024
      @nathanli3024 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@pteronarcyscalifornica694 A law doesn't stand if it violates the constitution.

    • @pteronarcyscalifornica694
      @pteronarcyscalifornica694 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@nathanli3024 And, SCOTUS explicitly ruled, in Korematsu v US, that the exclusion order leading to the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II was constitutional.

    • @acbower4468
      @acbower4468 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TejasM14 ironically, the Dred Scoot decision was an opinion based on an evolutionist interpretation of the document.