Are the 2024 D&D Rulebooks a CASH GRAB?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 9

  • @CunningSmile
    @CunningSmile 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think to a certain extent all of D&D is a cash grab, it’s a luxury product that none of us actually need after all, but as you say that’s an aspect of capitalism I can live with. For these specific books I agree they’ve put too much work in to fit the normal definition of a cash grab and after a decade there were some parts of 5e that needed refining or reworking because they just weren’t working

    • @progressiveDND
      @progressiveDND  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well for sure companies have to make money in order to exist. I’ve heard people act like even a dime spent with wotc is a moral negligence.

  • @quillogist2875
    @quillogist2875 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is so much new content in the 2024 books that they are worth it. It is also selling for $10 less than Paizo charged for their remastrrd books, Which has a lot less content.

  • @RIVERSRPGChannel
    @RIVERSRPGChannel 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think 5.5 is a bit of a cash grab and why not call it a new edition?

    • @progressiveDND
      @progressiveDND  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I personally (Daniel) think their goal here is to create a constantly evolving system, which is why they are going to years, with incremental upgrades. I can see why they would go full price on this one, my hope being if we see a 2025 or 2026 that it's lower cost, add on/upgrade to the existing books.

    • @flamepulse42
      @flamepulse42 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@RIVERSRPGChannel it’s not a new addition. It’s an update to the existing ruleset. 2nd edition was a very different system the. First. Third and 4th were also different. This version while has changes is fundamentally still the same system.

    • @matthewweber3904
      @matthewweber3904 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@progressiveDND they seem to want to draw on the live-service model to force users to subscribe to a system in constant update/upgrade. I have no interest in such a thing, and I doubt it will work for them. Look at how many video game companies tried to cash in on live service and wound up crashing and burning.