How gas pumps know when to turn themselves off

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 7K

  • @SteveMould
    @SteveMould  2 ปีที่แล้ว +6570

    If I've set things up right, the title of this video should say "gas" for US people, and "petrol" for UK people! If you're in one of those countries, can you confirm?
    The sponsor is 80,000 Hours: head to 80000hours.org/steve to start planning a career that is meaningful, fulfilling, and helps solve one of the world’s most pressing problems.

    • @zelphizorous690
      @zelphizorous690 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1092

      how did you do that? im in us and it says gas

    • @arcaegecengiz
      @arcaegecengiz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +903

      It says petrol in the UK

    • @CMT_Crabbles
      @CMT_Crabbles 2 ปีที่แล้ว +608

      American here, it does show as “gas”
      Thats really cool!

    • @ScappaDappaDo
      @ScappaDappaDo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +243

      Gas for America

    • @alexwatt9038
      @alexwatt9038 2 ปีที่แล้ว +211

      Petrol in uk. 🎉

  • @donaldasayers
    @donaldasayers 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2384

    As a (retired) technology teacher, I can respect the huge investment in time and energy needed to make and test those models. Also your perspex models are getting better as you learn. Good jobs all round.

    • @SameAsAnyOtherStranger
      @SameAsAnyOtherStranger 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Like what Edward R. Murrow said about television except put in the hands of people who care about such things- "This instrument can teach, it can illuminate; yes, and even it can inspire. But it can do so only to the extent that humans are determined to use it to those ends."

    • @AdiAgeraRS
      @AdiAgeraRS 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      you must have been amazing teacher

    • @colaknugen5608
      @colaknugen5608 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@AdiAgeraRS i get the same energy

    • @UQRXD
      @UQRXD 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      And the money he makes on youtube.

    • @johanmolendijk9811
      @johanmolendijk9811 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @veryslyfox Marie Curie would like a word.

  • @iTrialpha
    @iTrialpha 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2655

    You can feel the petrol (water) hammer/hydraulic shock when the pump shuts off as the valve closes as well. Always wondered about that, cheers Steve this was really interesting

    • @SteveMould
      @SteveMould  2 ปีที่แล้ว +390

      Oh yeah! Good observation

    • @MattH-wg7ou
      @MattH-wg7ou 2 ปีที่แล้ว +110

      Yea, and see the whole hose jump from that effect.

    • @kevinwhite6176
      @kevinwhite6176 2 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      @@SteveMould From your demonstration, it also seems like when the gas valve gets closed, the fluid flow is now pushing the valve shut (it was held open by the lever action), which probably contributes to it slamming shut. Which I presume is also good at ensuring that the gas flow stops immediately.
      I bet if you had made your plastic cutaway demonstrator with a much larger diaphragm, it would have moved a lot further. Since there's no such thing as negative pressure as you said, the diaphragm moves because outside air pressure pushes on it since there is lower pressure pushing back on the other side. That's how the power brakes in a car work - they aren't being actively pressurized (except maybe when your ABS gets triggered), and instead a vacuum from the intake manifold of your car engine is formed on one side of diaphragm that can be up to 11" wide. That's 95 square inches, for a maximum sea level force of 1,425 pounds, and that is multiplied through the master cylinder like with the pedal leverage. Thus even a partial vacuum in your power brake booster has force comparable to how much you can press down on the brake pedal with all your might.

    • @iAgos46
      @iAgos46 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What is the mechanism that triggers the shut off when flow is stopped at the pump? I cannot see it clearly.

    • @mungo7136
      @mungo7136 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@iAgos46 It could be a simple pressure sensor somewhere in the whole tube system. It also depends on the pump used - it can be simply running all the time you take the nozzle assembly out of the main body till you return it - some pumps have no problem to pump the liquid against the closed system - in that case you need no sensor just the one that checks if the nozzle assembly was returned back

  • @gordonmcknight8877
    @gordonmcknight8877 2 ปีที่แล้ว +852

    I remember looking up how this worked a few years back. The fluid dynamics and drawings went way over my head and I was left confused. Incredibly impressed (but not surprised) that you managed to clearly explain the mechanism to a total lay person in just over ten minutes!

    • @micahphilson
      @micahphilson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      I've been going through an engineering course over the last couple years, and I've learned a ton about fluid physics and dynamics. This video covered so much of those classes all at once and explained it all so clearly and succinctly, such in-depth topics so concisely, he makes it look easy! This video is incredibly well done!

    • @burntalive
      @burntalive 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I read a youtube comment about it a couple days ago and didnt really understand it. The visual explanations really helped it click all together!

    • @AnalogDude_
      @AnalogDude_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@micahphilson because "highly" educated people think to complex, i follow a professor here on tube, it's pretty much theory, but no practical experience and rather clumpy.
      they have a star mind, not really open for new things and ideas, than someone without a university degree comes along and leaves the professor stunned and in the dust.
      you shouldn't really admire these people, they aren't really smart al better at numbers because of routine. they can't solve simple things.

    • @micahphilson
      @micahphilson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@AnalogDude_ I'm in a military training program, we're only learning about the systems and the theory behind the systems we use, and working practically with those systems. We're taught by people with like at least 6+ years of experience, not professors.
      But to do it, we have to learn all the theory and physics, chemistry, materials science, fluid dynamics, engineering etc. behind it all because it's literally nuclear physics and nuclear power.

    • @AnalogDude_
      @AnalogDude_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@micahphilson waste of time, people that see ghost where there aren't, better the invent something on your own and hope that it sells. they asked me as well when i was 18 and i told them you must be joking, you must be out of your mind and they left me alone, recently i got to speak to one of these people, lol.

  • @Worlds_okayest_engineer
    @Worlds_okayest_engineer ปีที่แล้ว +4048

    I’m a an engineer and I used to work for the company that originally created that design. Actually, I redesigned that ball bearing mechanism. I can confirm that you are correct in your assessment of how it works. Also, most gas nozzles have a second diaphragm or plunger (not membrane) that deflects when there is pressure in the fuel line. It is used for prepay fill up. When you hit the prepay amount the dispenser shuts off, the pressure in the nozzle drops and that second diaphragm which is spring biased up will move and shut the nozzle off. There is a third shutoff in some nozzles that is called an attitude device. When a … moron… pulls a flowing nozzle out of a car’s fill pipe, a ball bearing blocks the pickup tube and shuts the nozzle off.

    • @riteshdhakate7935
      @riteshdhakate7935 ปีที่แล้ว +202

      Please make a video about that too :P It's quite difficult to understand how prepay is hit and what happens when a moron pulls out a flowing nozzle out of the car.

    • @sleepyjoescumbag1663
      @sleepyjoescumbag1663 ปีที่แล้ว +125

      Cool story Mr "I am an Engineer"

    • @CZRaS
      @CZRaS ปีที่แล้ว +159

      I'm the bearing and I can confirm this is a lie

    • @BlackMesa322
      @BlackMesa322 ปีที่แล้ว +104

      Anti-moron mechanism lol

    • @adithyavraajkumar5923
      @adithyavraajkumar5923 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Regarding the attitude device, what if I want to fill up a spare container of gasoline or something like that? Wouldn't the 'attitude' device prevent me from doing so?

  • @frankmayer559
    @frankmayer559 2 ปีที่แล้ว +871

    I am fascinated by how much simple technologies are put together inside that thing and how hard it is to explain how they interfere with each other…

    • @stefanopalmiotto5605
      @stefanopalmiotto5605 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Cause theoretically they’re not simple, the fluid mechanics behind them is quite fascinating

    • @gabydewilde
      @gabydewilde 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      you would enjoy this th-cam.com/video/gwf5mAlI7Ug/w-d-xo.html

    • @Bramon83
      @Bramon83 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Interact*

    • @Physics072
      @Physics072 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Some people can explain in 2 minutes what others take 2 hours to do.

    • @Caderic
      @Caderic 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, it is multiple simple devices put together to make a somewhat complex device.

  • @romanmichaelhamilton8729
    @romanmichaelhamilton8729 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1407

    I was mentored by the two engineers who patented this back in 1965 and worked with them for over three years. They are both gone now, but they gave me a lot of knowledge during that time. One was like a second father to me and he was as detailed and meticulous as one could be. They two men didn't get much out it as like most corporations do, the board takes it all for themselves.

    • @Raraoolala
      @Raraoolala 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      fascinating to find those with near 0-degree connections to things like this. Have you any stories from the 2 engineers you're keen to share?

    • @Osono2diWorld
      @Osono2diWorld 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Why not mention their names?

    • @mistere5857
      @mistere5857 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@JoaoGauss that's because the world is far more complicated than just having a really good idea. Marketing, logistics, accounting, managerial skills are all critical to turning a good idea into a gold standard. I'm not saying we can't make improvements, but the skills to take a product to market are just as important as having the idea for the product to begin with.

    • @mistere5857
      @mistere5857 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@JoaoGauss you absolutely have a good point. However, you also have to look at risk calculations. The risk to blue-collar workers to take on a new product is very low. If the product fails, even if the worker loses thier job, they are still entitled to severance and/or unemployment. However the risk grows and compounds with each level of management up to and including the owners of the business who have the highest level of risk. I'm all for profit sharing, but there is no question that the CEO/owner should be getting a lot more share of the profits than an average worker. Not to mention that many businesses should be reinvesting in their profits into their employees/business instead of lining their pockets.

    • @mistere5857
      @mistere5857 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@JoaoGauss you are minimizing the risk that owners take while overstating what blue collar workers go through. When a business fails, workers are laid off, not fired. Depending on the situation, they are typically given enough wages to last for 6months all the way to 2 years.

  • @journeyon1983
    @journeyon1983 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2802

    This is one invention that never seems to fail. It's never failed for me and I'm 66 years old. I've never seen or heard of this valve not working from other people either. That's quite a successful bit of engineering, I'd say.

    • @aapddd
      @aapddd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +142

      Physics works.

    • @gary5407
      @gary5407 2 ปีที่แล้ว +471

      I've found (accidentally) that it is possible to make the valve fail, at least on some pumps, if you are only partially pulling the trigger (so that the flow is reduced). Specifically, I was watching the meter (instead of the nozzle), trying to put in a "round number" amount of fuel, without realizing that it was just slowly overflowing onto the ground!
      I'd guess that the reduced flow-rate also reduces the "negative" pressure on the diaphragm, such that it can't overcome the spring force (to then shut off the fuel).

    • @CaseyMcots
      @CaseyMcots 2 ปีที่แล้ว +166

      Oh it fails. Never fully trust it

    • @CallioNyx
      @CallioNyx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      I agree, Robert. It's a very clever bit of engineering going into those things.

    • @abc321meins
      @abc321meins 2 ปีที่แล้ว +80

      Lucky you. It faild 4 times on me till now and I'm only 33. One time spilling all the gas and Three times stopping multiple times bevor the tank was full.

  • @DunningKruger778
    @DunningKruger778 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +139

    I had it, then lost it. Had it, lost it again. Then I got it. I love how you keep explaining with different visual examples. Such a great teacher.

    • @kerel866
      @kerel866 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Enough with the positivity

  • @richardstewart4135
    @richardstewart4135 2 ปีที่แล้ว +831

    I have worked as a mechanic and as an electrician for most of my adult life. Part of the fun of these careers is trying to figure out how things work. Most are pretty easy, however, I can remember a few times while pumping gas into my car that I thought about how those nozels worked. I thought a ventury and valve might have been involved, but never was able to tie it all together. Thank you for clearing all that up...Its always nice to see how things work. Well done!

    • @dannyarcher6370
      @dannyarcher6370 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Part of the fun?
      I never open anything up to figure out how they work because of the anxiety it causes me knowing that I am invariably going to break something or not be able to figure out how to put it back together.

    • @timn4481
      @timn4481 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      nozzle, venturi. and yes, it does matter.

    • @TheCorintur
      @TheCorintur 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@dannyarcher6370 That is why you only do that with stuff you don't really care about or that is already broken. I never throw any device away before performing an "autopsy" on it.
      Though, I would still advise doing some research before dismantling something. Knowing about compressed springs, dangerous capacitors or possible toxic substances in certain components can save you a lot of pain.
      Besides, this is YT and it has its own version of Rule 34. If it exists, there is a video YT video of someone dismantling it.

    • @richardstewart4135
      @richardstewart4135 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@TheCorintur Back when I was a kid in the 50's and 60's I used to drive my parents nuts because I took just about everything apart and tried to but it back together. I succeeded most of the time, but there were a couple of times I made things a lot worse. We didnt have youtube back then and the stuff in the libraries was vague at best. I grew up trying to fix everything I owned and never threw anything away. As to compressed springs and stuff like that, I had a couple go flying across the room, but you learn to be careful over time. And yeah, I now have a ton of junk stacked in my garage from all the fixin, but now, I can call them all antiques and sell em on ebay!

    • @nostalgicbliss5547
      @nostalgicbliss5547 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dannyarcher6370 That's why you're not an engineer

  • @MrEcted
    @MrEcted 2 ปีที่แล้ว +660

    This is one of those things I've probably wondered about 100 times while pumping gas, but always forget about by the time I get home so I never looked it up. I'm glad you have finally answered this mini-mystery, and done such in a way that is intuitive and easy to understand!
    I always assumed it was probably some sort of electronic sensor, but this is far more clever!

    • @madhukarjonathanminj2772
      @madhukarjonathanminj2772 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      i recently started driving,infact got my license on 14th of this month,and wondered about this question only a few days back.

    • @TIMEtoRIDE900
      @TIMEtoRIDE900 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I thought the European model would be much smaller considering they are pumping Liters and not Gallons.

    • @herrakaarme
      @herrakaarme 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@TIMEtoRIDE900 Maybe the pressure (flow) is just much higher in the USA? So that it takes the same time for a European to fill up the 40 liters tank of a shoe-sized Fiat Punto and for an American to fill up the 40 gallons tank of a Ram TRX monster.

    • @tectopic
      @tectopic 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha! Me too! And my work mate also. We discussed this just the other week. So now, rest at last.

    • @TIMEtoRIDE900
      @TIMEtoRIDE900 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@herrakaarme It varies between gas stations (USA) sometimes you get a slow pump, very rarely you get a REALLY fast pump, and if you pay inside the last gallon delivered goes SOOOO slow! like they don't want to give you an extra penny's worth.
      When I fill my boat it doesn't "trip" the shut-off so I have to listen for a slight gurgling and shut off myself or it spills several OZ on the swim deck. It's because the filler tube is 2 1/2" (60mm).

  • @ernest3286
    @ernest3286 2 ปีที่แล้ว +556

    The fact that this is all done mechanically and not electronically is what makes this so cool to me

    • @gordononkyo2713
      @gordononkyo2713 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Many principles that would function forever with repair that a craftsman can do will be replaced by digital stuff that needs from now on monetarized upgrades from above. That's cool for the big players.

    • @reasonerenlightened2456
      @reasonerenlightened2456 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      can it make the fuel free?

    • @Liberty2357
      @Liberty2357 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Want your mind blown? Look for videos on mechanical targeting computers.

    • @88porpoise
      @88porpoise ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I wouldn't be surprised if there are electronic components to some these days or in the near future.
      But these automatic shutoffs long predate the cheap and widely available integrated circuits we have today to enable us to computerize everything. These cutoffs were used before electronic displays became common.
      /I had always assumed it was based on a float, though

    • @organicfarm5524
      @organicfarm5524 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes, when most of the technology is becoming less mechanical more electrical, this piece of tech remains the same;)

  • @RobertoTifi
    @RobertoTifi 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I'm so satisfied when there's no electronics involved... Nothing but pure fluid-mechanical principles in action. Ingenious! And you're such a good teacher!

  • @NoTimeLeft_
    @NoTimeLeft_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +526

    The fact that you made a see-through, 2D version makes me unbelievably happy! Well done good sir

    • @peterknutsen3070
      @peterknutsen3070 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Steve always makes see-through 2D versions!

    • @agurdel
      @agurdel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Luckily this is not Matt Parkers channel. His stuff is great too, but he would make a 4D version that clarifies nothing.

    • @Nilguiri
      @Nilguiri 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@agurdel haha, excellent comment!

  • @wojtekpolska1013
    @wojtekpolska1013 2 ปีที่แล้ว +457

    You have a great style of making these videos.
    1 - You really struck gold with these 2D models, they show everything so nicely and without clutter
    2 - You explain things in multiple different ways, which is helpful when someone doesn't get it the first time, and then would be confused for the rest of the video
    So thanks for showing off clever designs and physic principles in this way :D

  • @6ftS
    @6ftS 2 ปีที่แล้ว +555

    I am no engineer, technician or mechanic, but I have been taking things apart all my life to figure out how they work. Thank you for explaining it all so well.

    • @Hayesboy96
      @Hayesboy96 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe you should be?

    • @maximus1992a
      @maximus1992a 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Did u put them back together afterwards?

    • @DsgSleazy
      @DsgSleazy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@maximus1992a he didn't say he was a puter back togetherer.

    • @inactiveaccount4829
      @inactiveaccount4829 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@maximus1992a People like you break my heart. Imagine shitting on someone's interest because of the way that they expressed it. I despise nit picky sarcasm like this.

    • @AntASurvival
      @AntASurvival ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I like to take things apart. But, when i try to put it back together, i always get some extra screws.

  • @beppebergmanable
    @beppebergmanable ปีที่แล้ว +55

    My parents ran a gas station and I helped them since I was a child. Your explaination helped me understand a phenomenon I experienced many times in my first twenty years of life! Very ingenious, hope someone was rewarded for this mechanism. Nice video and very good explaination, thanks!

    • @Andrew-FKF
      @Andrew-FKF ปีที่แล้ว +5

      someone was rewarded... by a paycheck... so dont worry!

  • @abrievanwyk7472
    @abrievanwyk7472 2 ปีที่แล้ว +519

    I don't usually comment on videos, but this deserves appreciation... Thanks Steve! That green and red model was amazing! To remove complexity with simple models is an extremely difficult thing to do and you nailed it here! Thanks again!

    • @bcc91
      @bcc91 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @Human-6358 Don't waste that amazing chance of making a 1-minute long video with as much information and clear didatic as this one here. You'll become famous, go for it!

    • @stephenhookings1985
      @stephenhookings1985 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I would agree ... if I could see green and red :-( but it is a good video.
      I was hoping we might understand why US have the auto stop filling mechanism but we don't have this in UK.

    • @bcc91
      @bcc91 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stephenhookings1985 that's weird as I've seen this in Germany and Switzerland, also maybe im France...

    • @janOliku
      @janOliku 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@stephenhookings1985 We... do have it in the UK. At least where I am.

    • @singerofsongss
      @singerofsongss 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Steve has a real gift for explanation. He is so good at taking complex stuff and breaking it down on a level that can be meaningfully understood by both a professional and a general audience.

  • @kayderl
    @kayderl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +644

    I respect the tremendous amount of time and effort you put in to the making of visual tools that you use to explain. There were at least 2 glass tubes, that green and red pipe stuff, the sawn in half nozzle, that mock up of the sawn in half nozzle and possibly more. Yet somehow, all I could do was to like, sub and share your video to my social media. I few that what I do isn't proportional to the amount of work you put in to this video and that is why I have mad respect for you. I thought I was a huge nerd, but I think I found a bigger one in you.

    • @briandmerritt
      @briandmerritt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I wouldn't worry too much, he's getting paid hundreds of thousands from TH-cam for all the views he's getting from these videos. It's a full time job that pays very well.

    • @h8GW
      @h8GW 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @Brian Merritt It might be lucrative, but that doesn't negate the amount of the effort that went into the video.
      Sometimes the ability for a TH-camr to turn their videos into a career is at the whim of the mysterious algorithm.

    • @SynthApprentice
      @SynthApprentice 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@briandmerritt No, he's really not getting nearly as much money from TH-cam as you think he is. He's almost certainly getting most of the money for this video through Patreon. Most TH-cam users don't realize this, but TH-camrs need to have several sources of income (TH-cam, Patreon, sponsors, merch, etc) because no one single source will provide enough money on its own.

    • @SynthApprentice
      @SynthApprentice 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you really want to do more to support the channel, consider contributing as a patron on Patreon.

  • @andrewshipp2739
    @andrewshipp2739 2 ปีที่แล้ว +502

    I'm a mechanic by trade. Can't say I've ever known how these work. As soon as you started on Venturis it all clicked for me, seeing carburettors work using the same principal. It's all clear now thanks to your great explanation. Thank you!

    • @abhishekpatil2412
      @abhishekpatil2412 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exactly the first thing that struck my mind when i saw the Venturi model.

    • @kdavisization
      @kdavisization 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I thought of carbs too but only because of smarter every day

    • @reasonerenlightened2456
      @reasonerenlightened2456 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      can it make the fuel free?

    • @richardnavratil9661
      @richardnavratil9661 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      "It all clicked." NICE PUN

    • @EarthSurferUSA
      @EarthSurferUSA 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep, me to. But the biggest light bulb for me was the hole near the end of the nozzle affecting forked venturi tubes when the tank was full and gas blocked the little hole. From that, I could see how a switch could be made. Pumped gas as a kid at my Dad's gas station in the 70's. Always wondered how that little square thing in the nozzle shut the pump off. Have you ever wondered if we were actually really smart a few generations ago? Progress?

  • @tavlogs6420
    @tavlogs6420 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I actually used to design different models for these types of "gas" pumps back in the day. You can probably tell how different & less bulky more recent models are and thats all thanks to years and years of improvement & fine details changed. I can also confirm that the little air gap in between the valve & cavity of the membrane is very crucial and probably the most important part of this whole device. Cheers!

  • @Bernardyn128
    @Bernardyn128 2 ปีที่แล้ว +300

    I have been wondering how this happens for SO LONG now, every time I visited the gas station in fact, but never got around to reading about it. You sir made my whole week! Thank you SO MUCH

    • @kamil030201
      @kamil030201 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Same here, glad I finally know!

    • @AnimationGoneWrong
      @AnimationGoneWrong 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      yeah, this was a GREAT explanation of how these mysterious devices work. I've always wondered how those worked... now I know!

    • @TryppiDnB
      @TryppiDnB 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I am also someone who ALWAYS wanted to know, always wanted to look into more every time I was filling it up. I guess I was meant to wait for this video to come out! Cause a lot of this would have went over my head without the visuals and in depth explanation. Life is trippy and great!

    • @torashuPanda781
      @torashuPanda781 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me too, even if I had researched how it works I don't know if I'd have understood it as I did with this video!

  • @scottcarr5014
    @scottcarr5014 2 ปีที่แล้ว +618

    *Standing Ovation* This was an incredibly thorough and intuitive explanation. Thank you Steve!

    • @jacobshirley3457
      @jacobshirley3457 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Welcome to the channel!

    • @Avets610
      @Avets610 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      A M A Z I N G

    • @GuyJustCool
      @GuyJustCool 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If somebody could understand and explain quantum physics, it’s this man. Thanks, Steve, amazing, as always.

    • @jacobshirley3457
      @jacobshirley3457 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GuyJustCool For those topics, I think ScienceClic does the best job one could possibly do.

  • @fattimiv
    @fattimiv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +439

    I love these kinds of (fluid)mechanical solutions to problems. They always seem so intricate, but built off such simple elements. Great design, great video!

  • @comedon
    @comedon ปีที่แล้ว +8

    It's common to say TH-cam is mainly a trash bin (I'm the first to repeat this refrain over and over). But beneath the common trash, those kind of videos which gives a glimpse of what Internet could be (what internet was intended to be). To share knowledge, elevate all of us (on any king of subjects, arts, sciences .....). This format is exemplary.

    • @andrewsprojectsinnovations6352
      @andrewsprojectsinnovations6352 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's all about knowing where to look. The best and worst part of the platform is that any random nobody can post a video on just about anything. Sure a lot of them just upload mindless nonsense (though sometimes good to decompress after a long day) but the ones that interest me the most are creators like Steve Mould: people just sharing their skills and/or interests out of passion.

  • @Thoron_of_Neto
    @Thoron_of_Neto 2 ปีที่แล้ว +751

    I tell you, if my professors had been as dedicated to explaining the venturi effect as you did in this video, I'd probably have picked up on a significant amount of the things they were teaching me. A lot of how aircraft work, is based around the venturi effect and the bernoulli principle because the one thing aircraft have in abundance, is air moving rapidly in a single direction lol.

    • @julianbrelsford
      @julianbrelsford 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Yes, the principles discussed here affect the functioning of wings, pitot tubes, traditional "six pack" instruments, etc

    • @Thoron_of_Neto
      @Thoron_of_Neto 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@julianbrelsford yep, and the applications only scale up the bigger the plane gets! I have disassembled something so many times and found a venturi of some flavor or another so many times!

    • @mateuszobara
      @mateuszobara 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      My fluid mechanics professor would kill me though if I were to tell that Bernoulli principle can be explained by conservation of energy (such explanation is limited and works only in some specific cases)

    • @cr10001
      @cr10001 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Venturi effect is how carburettors work, too.

    • @osfponikhths
      @osfponikhths 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@julianbrelsford Unfortunately wings do not fly because of bernoulli's principle (and as such the venturi effect), its a misconception.

  • @Vacuon
    @Vacuon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +110

    I always tried to design it in my mind, I thought the petrol was supposed to run back up the sensor line because of low pressure (that part I had) never would've thought it could be mechanical though. Blows my mind how clever mechanical designs can be; I'm a computer engineer but sometimes I think the ease of electronics can make use lazy design-wise

    • @DougBoink
      @DougBoink 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I'm currently in college for computer science myself and I wholeheartedly agree, the fact that I can tell my computer to remember a number rather than having to design a complex mechanism that holds memory is incredible, and also feels incredibly lazy after seeing mechanical engineers do their thing 😂

    • @KekusMagnus
      @KekusMagnus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I agree, mechanical engineers nowadays are very tempted to use arduinos for every solution instead of designing an elegant mechanism that does the same thing

  • @shenton93
    @shenton93 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    As a native Spaniard, I naturally have all my google settings including youtube set to Spanish, I was confused when there was a robotic voice narrating everything you were saying with such precision so I thought it was part of the video. I then noticed the option to change the language of the actual video. I have never seen this before. Whether it was done by you or youtube, its a great addition to videos, specially for those that have trouble with english. Good job man!

  • @spicy110
    @spicy110 2 ปีที่แล้ว +274

    I used to run a station, so I knew how they worked in general but interesting to see inside the pump. What I can say is this system is so sensitive that as pump nozzles get old and that hole is slightly burred over it will keep clicking off.

    • @Appletank8
      @Appletank8 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      So that's what happens when I fill like half a gallon and the thing just stops, over and over.

    • @jasonbailey9139
      @jasonbailey9139 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      I have one particular car ('95 Toyota Camry) that has problems with constantly shutting off prematurely at several different gas stations, while my other cars have no issues at these same stations. Your comment about old handles makes me wonder if there's some defect in the top of my tank that exacerbates this problem.

    • @Volvith
      @Volvith 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@jasonbailey9139 Exact same problem here, different car.
      Wondering if there's something about the neck of the tank leading up that restricts the relief hole...

    • @MattH-wg7ou
      @MattH-wg7ou 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jasonbailey9139 Same. My 2015 Tahoe does this often. I never thought to correlate it to pumps, as I just thought it was my vehicle.

    • @Pink404
      @Pink404 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@jasonbailey9139 The fuel tank in my Toyota MR2 being high up relative to the filling point meant the curve of the filling pipe was such that the fuel didn't always run down as fast as was needed, causing this exact problem of the valve in the handle repeatedly closing. Lifting the pump handle slightly out or not filling at full speed (part pressing the lever) solved it for me in every case. It only happened at some stations, likely due to them having slightly faster pumps. If it was purely related to burring I would expect it to only apply to certain pumps at certain stations and not every pump at that station.

  • @SadeghBio
    @SadeghBio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +450

    I really appreciate what you do with these models. As a teacher I know this takes a lotta time to make the best one to show the audience.

    • @RishabhSharma10225
      @RishabhSharma10225 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I was about to write this same comment.

    • @Renee_R343
      @Renee_R343 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Someone should produce a set of practical models for demonstrating the most common principles in fluid dynamics. Like the ones Steve made himself for the pump nozzle. A practical model, that maybe even every student gets to test themselves would be much more engaging and easier to understand.

    • @matthewbartsh9167
      @matthewbartsh9167 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Renee_R343 You, Sir, are a genius.

  • @robroysyd
    @robroysyd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +329

    Thanks Steve, in a roundabout way you've solved one of my life's great mysteries: Why is it so darn hard to fill a small can of petrol. There's a minimum flow of fluid required to prevent the mechanism from shutting off the flow. My strategy is to pull the lever fully to set the mechanism and then to ease off but if I go to far there's a click and no flow. Very frustrating trying to fill a 5L can.

    • @lemoncitrine7023
      @lemoncitrine7023 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      There's always the tried and true way of waterfalling it into the can. You can press the ring on the outside of the nozzle (if it has that safety feature) by hand and just hope you don't spill
      Obviously I don't recommend doing that, as it circumvents multiple safely features, but it works

    • @jackroutledge352
      @jackroutledge352 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Part of the problem I think is that there isn't much space between the nozzle and the sides of the opening to let air flow into the can, then up the venturi tube. This means that the pressure relief provided by the valve is less effective, which actuates the stop.

    • @ReservedForFutureUse
      @ReservedForFutureUse 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Use a funnel

    • @mvbmvb
      @mvbmvb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Man’s making Molotov cocktails at the gas station

    • @realraven2000
      @realraven2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      the trick is not to insert the nozzle too deep... just the tip.

  • @pargelenis780
    @pargelenis780 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great video. I'm a mechanic that work for petrol stations, but to repair the pistols we send it in our main manufactory. It was amazing to see your video and now i can work better. sorry for my english skills

  • @bladder1010
    @bladder1010 2 ปีที่แล้ว +102

    As a crusty old journeyman industrial instrument mechanic, let me say, this is another great video. Steve Mould has such a great talent for explaining these principles that our modern world depends on. Well done!

  • @gavreynolds2689
    @gavreynolds2689 2 ปีที่แล้ว +160

    I work in the fuel industry and have often wonder how nozzles work, thanks for explaining it. The physics that go in to a common place item that most people would never ever wonder about how it actually works is amazing.

    • @DJ-ov2it
      @DJ-ov2it 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ive always wondered how this worked because i am enough of a neurotic to worry that i cant trust it and it spills over and oh god its shooting out of the tank and onto my pants and oh god now theres a puddle and OH GOD I DONT KNOW WHY BUT NOW EVERYTHING IS ON FIRE MY CAR IS BURNING THE GAS PUMP BLOCK IS BURNING AND I TRY TO GET AWAY BUT THE GAS STATION EXPL-

    • @stopthephilosophicalzombie9017
      @stopthephilosophicalzombie9017 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I imagine most people have wondered how it works. I had an idea it was a venturi effect but I wasn't sure how it operated.

    • @Leonarco333
      @Leonarco333 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I love this channel because it answers the question every high school student asks repeatedly. “When am I ever going to use this stuff?” The answer, is every single thing you see in your everyday life is an amalgam math and physics. Most tend to take it for granted because the students who found the answer to that question make it all possible.

    • @stopthephilosophicalzombie9017
      @stopthephilosophicalzombie9017 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Leonarco333 The smartest 1% make the stuff the rest of the idiots get to use and claim credit for.

    • @Leonarco333
      @Leonarco333 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stopthephilosophicalzombie9017 accurate. Sad, but accurate.

  • @Frrk
    @Frrk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +231

    Amazing. I love it when they manage to make things react to the environment without needing electronics.

    • @misterman3187
      @misterman3187 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why?

    • @cbpe1234
      @cbpe1234 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @@misterman3187 just because it is low tech, mechanical. Electronic is the easy way out, more exspensive though. Not saying electronic is bad, just that many mechanical designs just take more science to work, not just sensor goes off and then close valve.

    • @bmo3778
      @bmo3778 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      "It's mechanical machines, son. They react to physical events. unlike the digital do-hickeys you youngsters use these days. They're reliable, easy to produce, and easy to maintain"

    • @watcher8582
      @watcher8582 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do as the Romans do.

    • @whatevernamegoeshere3644
      @whatevernamegoeshere3644 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@cbpe1234 That is... an oversimplification to say the least. Electronics and mechanics have their own place, there is no easy way out. Sometimes the mechanical solution is simpler, sometimes not. Sometimes electronics last longer, sometimes not. The aspects you need to look for in every case is the cost, lifetime and cost of assembly and repair. Like you can ditch a limit switch and install a Hall effect sensor but it costs 10 times as much, but also the life went from a couple million cycles to a couple billion. But you won't do that in a 50$ kid's toy. It always depends on what you need exactly.

  • @kjamison5951
    @kjamison5951 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Taking the time to create the demonstration models really helped to nail this! Your delivery was pitched just right without resorting to dumbing down the content. Thank you!

  • @elekbuday81
    @elekbuday81 2 ปีที่แล้ว +138

    If you want the membrane in your model to flex more, an easy way would be to make it more "3D" (You'll notice the membrane in the actual nozzle is a big circle, not a thin strip). This will help for two reasons. First, more area for the pressure to act on means more force on the membrane. Second, larger things are easier to bend than smaller things, because the force has a longer moment arm. (If you've ever snapped sticks for firewood, you'll know it gets way harder to snap halves into quarters than it was to snap the whole into halves)

    • @Bllksem
      @Bllksem 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was assuming it was also just how constricted the Venturi tunnel is. You’re starting off with a pretty high pressure and then you’re pushing the liquid through a very small space. Smaller space = more speed, more speed = larger pressure drop. But I also don’t know much about fluid dynamics that was just one of the things I noticed.

    • @elekbuday81
      @elekbuday81 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Bllksem that would also have an effect, because it would change the pressure acting on the membrane. It's just a harder change to implement on the model than my suggestion

    • @leocurious9919
      @leocurious9919 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its just as easy to flex regardless of size, size is not a material property. What changes is the total amount of deformation. The same way a 1 cm long rod of steel pretty much doesnt change its size when heated/compressed/tensioned (visibly) but a 1'000 m rod of steel would massively change in lenght, 100'000x as much. So instead of eg. 10 µm it would be 1 whole meter longer/shorter.

    • @elekbuday81
      @elekbuday81 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@leocurious9919 ... yes, I simplified the material mechanics in my explanation. But given that we're talking specifically about total deformation instead of strain, I just skipped to total deformation. Also, I clearly meant "for a given force", not "for a given moment". You would be correct for axial force, but this is shear force and bending moment.
      Also, the specific scenario at play - bending of a plate (technically a membrane, but that's just a very thin plate) - *does* actually care about size and shape. Bending is (approximately) quadratic with length, not linear, and plate deformation is heavily dependent on the shape of the plate.

    • @leocurious9919
      @leocurious9919 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@elekbuday81 You are of course right, it is not linear with size. The forces keep adding up, they are not constant. An error I made while posting a quick reply, trying to correct you.

  • @chrisnoran
    @chrisnoran 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    The way you explained and showed the fulcrum and how it's point changes explains everything about WHY it feels different to try to pump when there's nothing flowing through vs. when gas is moving through it. Put into words and imagery what I've intuitively felt for most of my life. Bravo!

  • @krokeman
    @krokeman ปีที่แล้ว +906

    Pretty complex mechanism. I always thought it's somewhat simplier. Very good vid Steve.

    • @glumreaper8885
      @glumreaper8885 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Its very simple mechanically if you think of the two parts as a sensor and a signal not to mention whatever it takes to close the valve. These gas pumps basically take a three part problem and use two mechanisms to solve all three. The beauty of the design is that both operate with only fluid dynamics. Most other sensors require a bit of chemistry or some other physical property (to detect a chemical presence) and a bit of electricity (to transmit the signal) as well as moving parts to operate the valve.

    • @LordZordid
      @LordZordid ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@glumreaper8885 If it was so simple, in the old days they would have used the system to fill up their horses.

    • @themuckler8176
      @themuckler8176 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is simple. Basic pipe fitter knowledge

    • @Targoon_Music
      @Targoon_Music ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@LordZordid i tell ya son in the ol days we filled arr horses witha notha type of pipe and we damn well knew when to stop

  • @fuzzblightyear145
    @fuzzblightyear145 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent explanation and demonstration. Always wondered exactly how it works.
    The click always sounded mechanical (not electrically switched), and always though it's got to do with some back pressure on the petrol flow.
    What an elegant solution using the venturi effect of the *air* flow to control the valve.

  • @TheNextThing
    @TheNextThing 2 ปีที่แล้ว +243

    I used to rebuild these nozzles as a teenager. I found it fascinating trying to figure out the engineering behind all of the components. Steve, the only thing you forgot to include is the fact that the part of the mechanism that locks using the bearings is also affected by the pressure of the fuel itself. That is why you cannot open the valve until the pump has engaged and built pressure in the system.

    • @MyNotSoHumbleOpinion
      @MyNotSoHumbleOpinion 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Nope! There's no fuel into the bearing lock! If so, the positive pressure under the membrane will push to up and will disengage the bearings! And also the pump wont start until you pull the trigger lowering the pressure into the hose! Well at least in Europe work in that way!

    • @TheNextThing
      @TheNextThing 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@MyNotSoHumbleOpinion Interesting. In the US, you can clearly tell that the valve in the nozzle does not open until the pressure in the hose has built up. There is a part of the nozzle that uses that pressure to help engage the bearings allowing the valve to open. I'm not suggesting that fuel enters the bearing lock itself, only that pressure from the fuel in the line affects that part of the mechanism allowing it to engage the bearing lock.

    • @TheNextThing
      @TheNextThing 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@MyNotSoHumbleOpinion Here is another video that explains the safety feature I'm talking about very well. The part I'm referring to is discussed starting at about the 1:20 mark. th-cam.com/video/q3phjAQZdGg/w-d-xo.html This is the part that I was mentioning to Steve.

    • @MyNotSoHumbleOpinion
      @MyNotSoHumbleOpinion 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@TheNextThing Yes, maybe it's slightly different! In Europe the trigger can remain pulled, but the internal mechanism is disengaged! You can put the pistol in the pump with trigger locked, but no flow until you reset the trigger back to open!
      So now I'm curious about different countries technology: how the pump know when start to build pressure in the hose? There's a button on the pump?

    • @TheNextThing
      @TheNextThing 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@MyNotSoHumbleOpinion Yes! I didn't realize things were so different either. On our pumps, we pay, then we select the fuel grade. After that, you wait for a few seconds for the pump to pressurize. Then you can start pumping. Until the pump is pressurized, you can pull the lever as much as you want, but the bearing mechanism won't lock. So I usually have to keep pulling the lever and letting it go until it has pressurized.

  • @bishipc117
    @bishipc117 2 ปีที่แล้ว +87

    Leave it to Steve to take a very complicated product and simplify it. I love that I can watch his videos and understand something at the end of it. Thank you Steve I appreciate all that you do.❤

  • @bigmilk13_
    @bigmilk13_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +374

    Many youtubers wouldn't have taken the time to craft the supplementary models that you made for this explanation, but I am SO GLAD you did. I'm a big visual learner and those models were excellent (and I can tell you had fun making them as well).Thanks for answering yet another question I didn't know I had!

    • @RohanSanjith
      @RohanSanjith ปีที่แล้ว

      Because many youtubers don't get millions of views like this channel, and it'll be a waste of effort

    • @lautho0077
      @lautho0077 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/rhgwIhB58PA/w-d-xo.html

    • @Soldier9478
      @Soldier9478 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Every heard of practical engineering? He also loves making mini models

  • @richardaversa7128
    @richardaversa7128 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The mechanism is both elegant yet high complex, and understandable thanks to all the detail and props Steve included. Well done!

  • @Saadi_Lyfe
    @Saadi_Lyfe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    This is so amazing.. a few days ago me and my nephew were having a discussion on this on how we thought petrol nozzels worked... and ofcourse weren't sure of it.... and i see this video today that explains exactly how they work. In the begining of the video i was thinking to myself this is way to complicated for me to comprehend.. but by the end of it i now know exactly how they work... thank you so much... such an amazing teacher... LOVED IT......

  • @LiquidAudio
    @LiquidAudio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +105

    As an ex science teacher and lover of great explanations, I reckon you’ve deconstructed and explained that brilliantly. Fabulous work there!

    • @DevinDTV
      @DevinDTV 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      except his explanation for Bernoulli's principle (the most important part) was completely useless. it's exactly this type of hand waving nonsense that frustrates young students and turns them off from science and engineering. you can't explain something with a physical law. a physical law is just a description, not an explanation. conservation of energy is not why the pressure drops, it's just another way to describe that the pressure drops.
      the actual reason the pressure drops is simply because the atoms which go through the narrower passage are more likely to have a smaller vector component which is perpendicular to the walls of the tube. in other words, the atoms which happen to bounce into the narrower section are those which on average are moving forward not sideways. aka they are hitting the walls of the tube with less frequency and with less force so the pressure against the walls is lower. basically the narrowing of the tube filters out the particles that are likely to contribute much to the pressure against the walls of the tube.
      it's not because of magical calculations that dictate that "it simply must be so or this law would be wrong!". no. it's just geometry.

  • @MarcosProjects
    @MarcosProjects 2 ปีที่แล้ว +143

    I've loved your 2D models of fluid dynamic things series, and this might be my favorite one yet because it's about an object most everyone is familiar with/has used, AND it's so complex and cool. Nice one!

  • @kitgodsey
    @kitgodsey ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Your vids help me learn physics in a way my college classes couldn't. Even though this was a lot to follow and kind of hard, it all clicked in the end and I feel so excited to know how this system works 😊

  • @mechanickw.5995
    @mechanickw.5995 2 ปีที่แล้ว +144

    I've looked this up before and only *kinda* understood what was going on. Just a couple of days ago I was filling the tank and got to wondering again - so glad this popped up for me! This is an incredibly detailed explanation - I love the cutaway models you make for your videos to really break down complicated 3D concepts into 2D, it is so helpful as a tool to see those. Well done, I always learn so much from your videos, and show them to students and other education professionals.

  • @billfield8300
    @billfield8300 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Hi Steve. I work in the 'petroleum' industry calibrating these gasoline or petrol dispensers. Many new techs ask how this device works and now I can send them here to answer their questions in a very informative scientific way. Great job. Thanks.

  • @atlas4733
    @atlas4733 2 ปีที่แล้ว +145

    The illustration of the ball bearing lock thing you made in 2d is almost an exact replica of the internal parts of an mp5!
    The mechanism works to delay the opening of the chamber until the bullet has left the barrel so the pressure can drop to safe levels. The green pointy part of the mechanism holding the rollers outwards has its point facing forwards, and the red ramps are full notches instead. When the gun fires, the recoil passes through the part that’s locked and pulls backwards the pointy part holding the ball bearings in, then once unlocked, the whole mechanism goes in the opposite direction than in the video, starting the process of cycling the gun.
    Sorry for the rambling. I just think it’s really cool to see not only interactions, but full mechanisms in completely different fields!

    • @gesamtszenario
      @gesamtszenario 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Exactly! Roller-delayed blowback was the hot shit for a while, and basically anything the former Mauser guys at Heckler & Koch ever did. G3, MP5, HK33, HK21, P9...

    • @VilmaHallikas
      @VilmaHallikas 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      So next up: Steve cuts a mp5 in half :D

    • @owoberon4947
      @owoberon4947 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks, now I can make my own mp5!

    • @margue27
      @margue27 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have heard of mp3 and mp4 format, but wth is mp5?

    • @mahditaher2787
      @mahditaher2787 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@margue27 a gun

  • @Limb0girraf
    @Limb0girraf ปีที่แล้ว +12

    "So I bought this thing and cut it in half"
    -Steve Mould literally every video

  • @KelsomaticPDX
    @KelsomaticPDX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Thank you so much for this. I think about this ALMOST EVERY TIME I fill up my tank and have never known how it works. What a satisfying mechanism, too

  • @bidaubadeadieu
    @bidaubadeadieu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Wow, I can tell how difficult this must have been for you to explain clearly and succinctly, and your added models knocked it our of the park!

    • @aoyuki1409
      @aoyuki1409 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      it is something quite complicated but the Venturi effect, Double Lever latch and the bearing locks are all pretty common in everyday engineering. In fact most of engineering all follow basic principles but they're just carefully engineered to work in real life instead of only on paper.
      Fun fact: your toaster uses electromagnets to keep the spring down. the amazing bit of this electromagnet mechanism is that the lever that you push down has a piece of metal attached to it, and when it goes all the way down it connects the main and the toaster circuit and powers up the toaster. when the toaster is powered up it keeps that metal in place, and its built in timer will cut out the power to the electromagnet. Hence why you cant lock a toaster down when its not powered.

  • @Elektronaut
    @Elektronaut 2 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    That changing fulcrum concept is really interesting. I noticed similar constructions in automatic circuit breakers, as safety in firearms and in (photographic) leaf shutters. I always wonder how such things were calculated in the past and now it's done today.

  • @ZaraPoeta
    @ZaraPoeta ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Wow, I guess that's why ytube is so popular. Dude you have put an insanely amount time into making this vid
    I really, really enjoyed this, thank you for taking up your time. As engineer it was quite enjoyable to see Bernoulli Venturi in action in such a device
    I never thought this nozzel was such a "master piece" of a design. Thanks a again and keep the hard work!

  • @AriasElectronics
    @AriasElectronics ปีที่แล้ว +786

    Excellent explanation. It was worth the effort you put into that illustration. Thanks to that I have understood perfectly how something that I always ask myself works. You have made all of that seem so easy now, and it really is, but to most of us it seems more complex than reality. Thanks and greetings from Tampa, Florida.

    • @trevorcarlisle5447
      @trevorcarlisle5447 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I know! I was thinking "wow, I actually understand this model that he made."😂 Give him much props for that 👌

    • @KimberleySanchez
      @KimberleySanchez ปีที่แล้ว

      I totally agree. I'm so impressed that he built the models & presented the effect so clearly. Very interesting - I'm a fan now.

    • @jimhen459
      @jimhen459 ปีที่แล้ว

      ANY WAY TO CHEAT ON IT?

    • @michalrymes544
      @michalrymes544 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I don't agree. 13 min video to explain 1 minute thing..

  • @xq1234wzts
    @xq1234wzts ปีที่แล้ว +67

    Great video. What I like about this mechanism is how non-electric this is. You have to admire engineers that developed that back in the days. Nowadays I got impression everything needs to be computer controlled. This mechanism shows us what true engineering is and it is uncanny.

    • @Joeshinhwa123-jw4um
      @Joeshinhwa123-jw4um ปีที่แล้ว +17

      It has to be non electric. If there is anything electric in that nozzle, well, electricity+gas= trouble. 😅

    • @firstnamelastname6699
      @firstnamelastname6699 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      right. to me, automatic watches still blow my mind. true engineering

    • @aformofmatter8913
      @aformofmatter8913 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@Joeshinhwa123-jw4um Not to mention that it's dangerous to accidentally use a pump with a broken sensor (& any method of detecting the broken sensor might also break)
      So, you design a pump where the sensor cannot break without rendering the whole pump inoperable, which you can only do mechanically

  • @adrian-g
    @adrian-g 2 ปีที่แล้ว +92

    As a sales engineer I find it amazing how you drive us through the explanation and build up the complexity of it. I'm learning more than just how gas pumps work!

    • @ericfieldman
      @ericfieldman 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think the best way to learn anything is to get the basic idea and then learn with gradually increasing complexity the principles and components that make up the big idea. Then you see the value of the application without getting bogged down in excessive detail first, and use that as a motivator to learn the rest. And the smartest contraptions and creations are usually made with principles of various studies and sciences, so if you can understand, you get a better framework to pivot to new topics. Steve's a great teacher

  • @jvincentpelrine4364
    @jvincentpelrine4364 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation. Just last week I experienced a gas pump that failed to automatically click into the off position resulting in a minor overflow and spill. The truck in front of me at the pump was taking an abnormally long time to fill. When I pulled into the pumps for my turn the result was the same. It was *very* slow. As the tank filled up it did not shut off and ended up spilling down the side of my car. I spoke with the station attendant and she said the low pressure at the pumps was due to filters in the pump that needed to be replaced and as it was a holiday weekend there was no one available to do it. Thus the low pressure coming out of the pump must not have been enough to trigger the shutoff. Enjoy your videos. Cheers from Canada (PS the title reads "How petrol pumps know...")

  • @ecsciguy79
    @ecsciguy79 2 ปีที่แล้ว +87

    What an amazing piece of engineering. Thanks Steve for explaining this!

    • @crisnmaryfam7344
      @crisnmaryfam7344 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      and just like every other "amazing engineering" it has fatal flaws. Certain gas tanks when that purge valve gets stuck, you have to pump 25-40c of gasoline at a time, taking you a total of 35 mins to pump a full economy car sized tank. Search "gas pump keeps shutting off" on youtube....

    • @simonepozzoli
      @simonepozzoli 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@crisnmaryfam7344 I would take that as a safety feature, if something is broken you can't spill gasoline

    • @joachimlarsen2k
      @joachimlarsen2k 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@crisnmaryfam7344 It happens from time to time, but it's not a problem (even less so when you know how the mechanism works). Just position the nozzle so it doesn't happen. You're welcome.

    • @ecsciguy79
      @ecsciguy79 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@crisnmaryfam7344 If the pump works for almost every tank out there, then I'd say your tank is flawed, not the pump

  • @dhadumia
    @dhadumia ปีที่แล้ว +169

    Thank you for explaining this! These old mechanical techniques of automation are fascinating!

  • @Tony_VanDine
    @Tony_VanDine 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thank you for this!! I work at a gas station and we have issues with the pumps sometimes where they are in a low-flow condition. The gas trickles out at the rate of a few cents per second, and when people inevitably start chatting with their pump neighbor to pass the time, the tank will start overflowing because the auto-shutoff feature doesn't trigger. Now I know why!! 😁
    Now I'm almost looking forward to that condition happening again, just so that I can share my newfound knowledge.
    I love your practical demonstrations.

    • @jenna2431
      @jenna2431 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That happened to me. There's a chain that has the slowest pumps that I always complain take forever. One day recently the dang thing spilled over on me, my shoes, everything. Never going to that chain again.

    •  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm curious about it failing the other way - can't the mechanism jam so that the flow won't be blocked when it overflows? It seems very delicate and prone to jamming.

    • @Tony_VanDine
      @Tony_VanDine 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @ I don't think so. It seems more prone to slip by design, like mousetrap or share. I would imagine that this design getting jammed would be like an unset trap setting itself when stepped on. Short of the spring that holds the diaphragm down failing in some way, or the sensor tube openings at the restriction getting clogged.

  • @00WhiteBlade
    @00WhiteBlade ปีที่แล้ว

    one time I had a gas pump repeatedly shut itself off even when my tank was near empty. I was getting really frustrated so I moved to a different pump after trying like 4 times. It worked perfectly.
    Now I realize the tube was probably clogged by debris or intentionally by some vandal. great video!!

  • @GCEism
    @GCEism ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thanks for this fantastic explanation!
    I used to work at a petrol station for 3 years and always wondered what was happening. Especially since we used to fill for the customers and on some occasions the pump would either constantly switch off despite not being full or fail and continue to overflow. It was never the pump itself as it would only happen with the single customer but now I'm wondering how the shape of the tank or angle of entry would affect it. I now know when people pulled up with the tank on the wrong side and we would have to stretch it around and have it pour from a 90° angle, why it would tend to overfill. You begin to learn the sound of when it's almost full out of repetition.

  • @gordonspond
    @gordonspond 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Been pumping my own gas for over 35 years now and have been wondering all that time how these things worked. Thanks for a very detailed and easy-to-follow explanation!

    • @mab8105
      @mab8105 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      U were pumping someone elses gas before? Like we all do? Or do u own a gas station?

    • @jacksonwhiteside7609
      @jacksonwhiteside7609 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Some states, especially out west, you cannot legally fill your own tank. Someone has to do it for you

    • @gamistry2947
      @gamistry2947 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      In India, no one fills their own tank. The gas station worker does it for you.

    • @bkark0935
      @bkark0935 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jacksonwhiteside7609 The two states it is prohibited to pump gas are Oregon is the west and New Jersey in the east.

  • @zwitshr
    @zwitshr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I love how creative people had to be to come up with solutions to problems, that previously probably were just accepted as something you had to deal with.

    • @BigeuleLP
      @BigeuleLP 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      oh shit, you here?

    • @josephgaviota
      @josephgaviota 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      AND, now these problems were all solved _WITHOUT_ computers, or even electricity!

  • @eduardozocchi8873
    @eduardozocchi8873 ปีที่แล้ว

    WONDERFUL!!! I spent all my life wondering HOW IN THE HELL this stuff works!!! But thanks for this absolutely magnificent explanation, I finally got all the deep secrets and science hidden behind this nozzle!!! And it's amazing the big amount of work Steve had to assemble all of those devices!
    Thanks, Steve, you're a great man! 👋👋👋👋👋👋👋

  • @allenzhu8096
    @allenzhu8096 ปีที่แล้ว +73

    As a chemical engineer, it is a very great demonstration and it’s fascinating how in depth you went with the Bernoulli effect, great work!

  • @pedrosmith221
    @pedrosmith221 2 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    As an engineer it doesn't surprise me how it works, it surprises me how it keeps working reliability.

    • @lilstubthumb
      @lilstubthumb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Exactly. It relies on an airtight seal and lots of moving parts. I'd expect these to fail all the time but that clearly isn't the case.

    • @JurekOK
      @JurekOK 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      it has been, well, engineered to work reliably . . . through many, many generations of accidents, fires, and small improvements to iron out every last wrinkle. With time, good designs succeeded, and bad ideas were melted for scrap. It's not like they did it precisely this way from the beginning.
      Scale helps: The fact that every petrol station needs a couple of these, and every small town has at least one petrol station or more, means that the budget available to engineer these things has been "sufficient".

    • @aoyuki1409
      @aoyuki1409 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@JurekOK and this is what amazes me about engineering. the fact that it continuously improve to be better and better every time to the very limits of what physics, and chemistry allows us

    • @Appletank8
      @Appletank8 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Sometimes though, you run into pumps that keep clicking off 5 seconds later.

    • @starmc26
      @starmc26 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Seems like they fail "safe"... If you've ever had a super touchy nozzle, you know what I'm talking about. They're designed so that if they fail, they fail to off, not on and flowing.

  • @MrWildbill
    @MrWildbill 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thanks, I had assumed that the gas ran up the little pipe and flipped some kind of lever but this makes far more sense and explains how it can do it so fast. It is amazing what engineers came up with to make stuff work before microprocessors and electronic sensors.

    • @oditeomnes
      @oditeomnes 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, but think about it. Not counting diesel, the petrol is a huge fire hazard. That means that any electronic device inside would need to be highly EX rated with all the complexity that follows.

  • @brokejaw
    @brokejaw ปีที่แล้ว +1

    a 13 minute video to explain a nozzle that we all take for granted really shows how much thought went into making these things.

  • @ashurean
    @ashurean 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    1:35 these kinds of things started making a lot more sense when I started thinking of air as if it were "sticky" or self-attracting. Moving air "pulls" on surrounding, slower air.
    On a side note, I feel like this is worth discussing if only for the reason that it's a device partially controlled by electronics but whose fail-state is normal operation. In an age of techbros coming up with all these high-tech "solutions" to minor problems, it's nice to see something that just works because of how it was built, not because of how it was programmed.

    • @Phootaba
      @Phootaba 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The carburetor for my high-pressure lamp use that 'sticky' effect to mix the kerosene-droplets to then be vaporised closer to the burner!

    • @HypherNet
      @HypherNet 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That's a really useful way of thinking about it for sure. As a programmer myself, I'd like to point out that this object _was_ programmed -- just that the "code" was written in mechanical parts, rather than in instructions for a computer. We programmers do have a tendency of making things over-complicated and thusly failure prone, but elegance or overcomplexity can exist regardless of the medium.

    • @benjaminmiller3620
      @benjaminmiller3620 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What is the difference btw "programmed" and "built"? It seems completely arbitrary. Electricity is a physical phenomenon you know; there's nothing metaphysical about it.

  • @henrikbakk1
    @henrikbakk1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    TH-cam finally recommended me this - no clue why it took so long. Amazing video, great explanation, hat off for the huge effort you put into making the models.
    Stunning production value overall. Definitely new subscriber here 🤓

  • @jesse00pno
    @jesse00pno 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Sir, I. Am. In. Awe. You have explained this PERFECTLY for me to understand! I have wondered all my adult life how this works and I’ve researched it a few times and never found adequate understanding. Until I saw this video, your video. I now understand this well enough to explain it to someone else, which is the gold standard of understanding! Thank you so very much!

  • @matthewbenton4767
    @matthewbenton4767 ปีที่แล้ว

    as a Tinkerer i have been looking for a 3D, or CAD file, for a gas pump nozzle. you sir have my utmost respect. I probably would have cut 4 of these apart called it magic and moved on, I did do that to 2 so far, Thank You.

  • @dannymartial7997
    @dannymartial7997 2 ปีที่แล้ว +90

    As a software engineer, I think hardware engineers are so much cooler. You have to understand how the world works on a completely different level to make cool new designs.

    • @sanches2
      @sanches2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      yes we are, but software is like magic. And to us most of you are magicians :).....
      .... until you come to our dept. and say "it doesn't work, it's a hardware problem"

    • @rf-iu5jj
      @rf-iu5jj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@WalterBurton The act of programming is a part of Software Engineering, but is not the entirety of it. Software Engineering includes elicitation and documentation of formal requirements and specification, various forms of testing, auditing and reviewing of existing code or software, application of various formal methods, etc. It's a common misconception that Software Engineering is merely programming, but programming is just one small part of the practice of Software Engineering.

    • @eekee6034
      @eekee6034 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@WalterBurton I used to chat with a supercomputer sysop whose job title included the word "engineer". He knew exactly where he stood on the grand scale of qualifications, but he used his title to tease his wife because she was a fully qualified civil engineer. ;)
      But seriously, programming is a form of engineering and I wish the world could afford to train the average programmer better, if that makes sense.

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WalterBurton "please"?

  • @meangreenst3
    @meangreenst3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    This is genuinely the most interesting thing I’ve watched in a long time. And I must say, your explanation is absolutely amazing. Not once did you stutter, think, or even say “ummm” as you go. Everything flowed, just like the nozzle 😉 great content, chap!

  • @brekkoh
    @brekkoh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    i'm happy to see any time steve cuts things in half

  • @burtvincent1278
    @burtvincent1278 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You did a good job. A layman explaining principals of hydraulics with no engineering experience in the field is challenging for sure.

  • @I3urton
    @I3urton 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Thank you so much for explaining this! For years I always felt a little uncomfortable filling up gas (nowadays is even more uncomfortable for unrelated reasons lol) because I never quite understood the mechanism that's stopping me from spilling fuel. One of my life's biggest car related mysteries is now solved!

  • @DoloJones
    @DoloJones 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    This is such a clever combination of principles but the most impressive thing for me is the way it was explained. This is the best step by step breakdown of any educational topic I’ve ever seen. Not one of the best, the best! Every time a side issue that could have scuppered things arose it was dealt with before it could be a factor that might throw you off course. Congratulations on this level of understanding of not only the things you are explaining but also the human learning experience. Top class!

  • @Shrooblord
    @Shrooblord 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Thank you Steve!! I rememebr another science TH-camr once doing an explanation on how this works and I'd recently studied fluid dynamics and pressure systems etc. in University, so it was all fresh in mind and I understood the whole thing. But it was _so_ condensed, I only _just_ grasped it. This is expansive, clear, super easy to understand. You highlight the base principles and explain all the same stuff but at a much slower pace. Love it! If I'd not already known how these things work, I'd have had my mind blown by this with an amazing a-ha moment near the end (like I had with the other video I saw after some significant headaches ahaha). Great stuff. Keep it coming!!

  • @TwistedCream
    @TwistedCream ปีที่แล้ว

    Steve Mould,
    This was very helpful thank you. I now understand why gas may not come through during hot weather. Gas expands with rising heat, and understanding how this nozzle works is enough to see why the expansion of the gas would make it much more difficult at times in high heat areas with certain types of nozzles.

  • @williamnarvaezjr5242
    @williamnarvaezjr5242 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Sir. I have always wondered how these worked. I have been watching you on and off over several years and truly love your descriptions. Thank you for making this such a simple and easy to understand concept. I look forward to your upcoming videos. I just wanna say thank you again for taking the time out to explain these little things in life. Extremely well put together. And you made this so easy to understand.

    • @madcatneon2604
      @madcatneon2604 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same here, i always wondered how they work and assumed that they have sensors inside the nozzle. After 10years of driving the answer finally came to me instead since for some reason i never searched for it.

  • @khalilahd.
    @khalilahd. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    I love your thirst for knowledge! I never know what I’m going to learn about when you post and yet I’m never disappointed. Thanks for another great Snapple fact Steve ❤

    • @GameOver-qk2ys
      @GameOver-qk2ys 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How...be honest are you a bot

  • @millatime62401
    @millatime62401 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At my job we have a particular vehicle that is difficult to fill due to length and slope of filler tube to tank. You have to hold the nozzle upside down to get it to fill without stopping. This video has now made sense of why that is. Holding the nozzle upside down prevents the ball bearings from falling in place.

  • @Htonartnomed
    @Htonartnomed 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I've been wondering this for YEARS! thanks for the first clear and understandable explanation of how this works!

  • @vonschlesien
    @vonschlesien ปีที่แล้ว +10

    That mechanism with ball bearings is very reminiscent of a roller-locked automatic firearm - rollers on the bolt stay pushed out and jammed into the frame (receiver) until the pressure in the chamber drops and it's safe for the action to open and cycle.

  • @Psychlist1972
    @Psychlist1972 2 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    I always wondered how these worked. I figured it wasn't electronic because they performed like this even back into the late 70s and early 80s when I was a kid paying attention to things like this. Thanks for the explanation. It's actually a bit more complex than I thought it would be.

    • @Ozsmallbore
      @Ozsmallbore 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      it was around in the 1960's as well

    • @koyotekola6916
      @koyotekola6916 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If these nozzles were electronic, they would still fail. Electronics fail for four reasons. One is they actually are mechanical beasts. Look at anything electronic, and you will see connectors, wires, copper traces, etc. These mechanical bonds and connections are the most unreliable part of electronics, and you can't avoid them. The most reliable parts are the dies, i.e. the silicon slab that has circuitry on it. They too have interconnections, but they're etched onto the silicon die and are well protected from the environment. Two is electronics are like most things, sensitive to temperature. Heat up a chip to beyond its design limits, and you will see failures. Three is voltage spikes. Everyone has experienced this in their homes when something suddenly dies after an electronic storm. And four, electronic circuitry eventually wear out. The die I mentioned earlier, it has electrons flowing through them. They eventually cause so much wear and tear that they can't travel through correctly. At some point, you lose enough functionality that the circuit fails. Think of a copper wire after a million years corroding so much that it becomes brittle and just falls apart. That time scale can quickly be shrunk by various things like salt.

    • @Psychlist1972
      @Psychlist1972 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@koyotekola6916 Are you replying to the right comment? I don't recall saying anything about failure modes here, or making any statement about reliability. My statement was about what was typical back then.
      I am familiar with electronics

    • @koyotekola6916
      @koyotekola6916 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Psychlist1972 What I responded to was your statement about their not being electronic back in the 1970s. What I meant was there was no reason to make them electronic, because they would be more unreliable than the original design. Most people think electronics are more reliable than mechanical, but they still have failures. The fact that this mechanical design has been extremely reliable means that it is a better choice than electronics.

    • @Psychlist1972
      @Psychlist1972 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@koyotekola6916 I see. Not really what I was saying, but thanks.
      It eventually became more cost effective for companies to make many things electronic rather than mechanical. It wasn't/isn't about reliability, but about cost of production and cost (complexity) of assembly, and the size of the resulting product. Examples include most everything else in the gas pump stand, much of what is in the vehicle, etc.

  • @SgtKOnyx
    @SgtKOnyx ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The "sword" and circles you used at about 8:30 is interesting to me, as it's a roller locking mechanism, which is used in some firearm designs, like the MP5 or G3, though in the MP5 it's not actually locked but "delayed" by this mechanism.

  • @matthewnardin7304
    @matthewnardin7304 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is an awesome explanation!! I knew it worked by utilizing a venturi but until now I didn't fully understand exactly how. The way this is broken down into all the components and how they integrate is amazing.

  • @Teh_Random_Canadian
    @Teh_Random_Canadian 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I love mechanisms like this. So simple yet so elegant and well designed.

    • @GoldenAdhesive
      @GoldenAdhesive 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I can't imagine how many iterations it took to get to the modern petrol pump

  • @BrilliantDesignOnline
    @BrilliantDesignOnline 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I have always wondered about this and as an engineer, you have done a brilliant job of explaining the system's operation. Thank you.

  • @shrimpyblaze
    @shrimpyblaze ปีที่แล้ว

    Steve; I've got to say, when I saw all your models and the title of the video I was confused on how any of it made sense! But the way you explain it all makes everything fall into place, it's very impressive!

  • @Kcducttaper1
    @Kcducttaper1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I've often wondered how these actually work. I suspected it was due to the Venturi effect somehow or another because I'd spotted the smaller hole at the end of the nozzle, but didn't really know much beyond that. Super cool to see one taken apart to see how it actually works!

  • @rodneyhooverCFI
    @rodneyhooverCFI 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Great video! I’ve often wondered what was going on inside as well, so thanks for the nice explanation.
    Your coverage on Venturi tubes and how they work is great. I’ve been a flight instructor for 17 years, so I talk about Venturi tubes a lot, your model on it and explanation was excellent! I’ll have to show that part to some students.

  • @YoshMaster
    @YoshMaster ปีที่แล้ว +4

    All my life I’ve spent half of my time at the pump wondering how this worked!! Thanks for finally letting me know 😁

  • @gamingonthego1421
    @gamingonthego1421 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I work in a petrol station and you've shown me more info in this one video than any of the training courses they send us on.

  • @edh6
    @edh6 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Very interesting, I never knew these used the Venturi effect. Another use of the venturi effect, that could be a possible subject for a 2d representation, are steam injectors (as found on steam engines). These force water through a non return valve into a high pressure steam boiler using only the pressure from that same boiler and a series of cones.

    • @Chubby_Lemon
      @Chubby_Lemon 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or another purpose use I can think of, carburetors!