SHE'S AMAZING☀️💧🔥Narset Enlightened Exile Historic Brawl

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024
  • Decklist - www.moxfield.c...
    Main Channel - / covertgoblueyt
    2nd Channel - / covertgoblue
    Commander - / covertgocrew
    VODs - / @covertgolive
    CovertGoBlue HQ - www.coolstuffi...
    All My Decks - www.moxfield.c...
    Patreon - / covertgoblue
    Twitter - / covertgoblue
    Discord - / discord
    Twitch - / covertgoblue
    Facebook - / covertgoblue
    Instagram - / covertgoblue
    TikTok - / covertgoblue
    Stats - tinyurl.com/cg...
    Sponsors
    CoolStuffInc.com Promo Code CGB5 - www.coolstuffi...
    Moxfield - www.moxfield.c...
    Untapped.GG Affiliate Link - tinyurl.com/un...
    Credits
    Written and performed by Daniel Wagner, aka CovertGoBlue
    Title Music by Sam Plotkin - www.samplotkinmusic.com
    Logo design by HolyMTG - HolyMTG@gmail.com Twitter @HolyMTG
    © CovertGoBlue Entertainment, LLC
    #cgb #mtgarena #mtg

ความคิดเห็น • 71

  • @volkfidde4269
    @volkfidde4269 ปีที่แล้ว +134

    Anyone else not surprised that shark typhoon has its own column in the deck build?

  • @patrickoconnell9387
    @patrickoconnell9387 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    If it says you can cast something without paying it's mana cost, that means you can't pay "X" because that is assigned when you are paying the mana cost. Hopefully that makes sense.

    • @Lordidude
      @Lordidude 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@andersfrandsen7077 and it's even spelled out (pun intended).
      *Without* paying it's mana cost.

  • @Nicksizzle77
    @Nicksizzle77 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    35:00 still surprised this trips you up. Best way I remember it is if anything let's you cast something with "X" in its cost "without paying it's mana cost" then you can't pay that X. Ever. Even if that condition is capped by something (like Narsets power) it still holds true. I could be wrong. I'm not a judge lol.

    • @Kestral287
      @Kestral287 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nah, you've got it. The one weird case to consider is where you have an X (or anything else) as an additional cost like Kicker, which you can pay. But for mana costs you're right.

  • @GD0nly
    @GD0nly ปีที่แล้ว +8

    "Urabrask didn't get to do much there." Yeah, that's his whole lore, actually, so very on flavour imo.

  • @TheFrigidMidget
    @TheFrigidMidget ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I have been looking forward to building this Narset since the second she was teased. My build is pretty similar, just the best permanent token generators, Narset protection, and some high powered bombs. Loved the "Oh I can play Liliana" moment when you realised planeswalkers were free game for Narset haha

    • @piercearora7681
      @piercearora7681 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, I'm considering some kind of a pump+haste strategy to just cheat out massive Walkers. Definitely not very good, but definitely fun.

    • @TheFrigidMidget
      @TheFrigidMidget ปีที่แล้ว

      @@piercearora7681 Tell you what, I've been experimenting with Mesmeric Orb to fill both GYs, and it has been doing some work. I didn't expect it to work as well as it has haha

  • @fuzbuzz00
    @fuzbuzz00 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    explosive decks are so much fun to watch. They're also the most puzzling to work through

  • @edh_alters7116
    @edh_alters7116 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love this. She was my first General from Aftermath as well. I too built mine nearly identical to this one. So cool!

  • @FanOfMostEverything
    @FanOfMostEverything ปีที่แล้ว +21

    The value of X in an X spell is defined by how much mana you spend. Casting a spell without paying its mana cost means you can't spend anything. Ergo, X is always 0.
    Sorry, CGB, them's the breaks.

    • @the_r4ts
      @the_r4ts ปีที่แล้ว +4

      As well as discount/tax effects, but yeah. I was one of those people screaming at the screen, lol

    • @piercearora7681
      @piercearora7681 ปีที่แล้ว

      So does that mean that something like a Haughty Djinn would let you cast for x=1 (because of the cost reduction)

    • @FanOfMostEverything
      @FanOfMostEverything ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@piercearora7681 No, because you're never paying the cost that got reduced. (Mind you, if, say, Thalia's out, then Djinn could help you there. Surcharges are added before discounts.)

    • @Ellie-Angela
      @Ellie-Angela ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@FanOfMostEverything ​ @Alpaca Pierce Actually, you define the value of X when declaring that you will cast a spell (if you're paying its mana cost), then you pay for it, which means that discounts can reduce the cost of X since it's (almost always) a colorless cost. CGB even has multiple videos taking advantage of that with Djinn or Mindsplice Apparatus.

    • @Garryl367
      @Garryl367 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@piercearora7681 The rule is actually that if you cast a spell without paying its mana cost, if there's an X in its cost, you must choose 0 for X. Casting the spell normally lets you choose the value, but casting it with any effect that skips the mana cost locks it at 0, regardless of any other modifiers or additional costs.

  • @shadowmyst9661
    @shadowmyst9661 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For my Narset, Enlightened Exile EDH deck I built her as a Combat Focused Spellslinger. I use an array of flexible Instants and Sorceries that perform a variety of potent Combat Tricks to pump her up, protect her, make her more evasive, and control the Battlefield.

  • @Liara_I_Sorry
    @Liara_I_Sorry 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's only the second time ( I was the first) I've seen that Slip out the Back trick used on an enemy for prowess. Amazing.

  • @Xgya2000
    @Xgya2000 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    See, I knew about that X rule from memory.
    The one rule that still trips me up is the exact opposite.
    When a card says "without paying its mana cost", ALL the other cards that say "cost X more to cast" somehow mess with my head.
    I wasn't supposed to pay. Your card says my card costs 1 more, and my other card says I don't have to pay. I instinctively think that "I don't have to pay" means "I don't have to pay no matter what Thalia says the card costs now". Nope.

  • @angrymurlocs3101
    @angrymurlocs3101 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome build. I definitely went more of a token build mixed with protection spells and a few things that give haste but did steal a few things CGB had. Also found cards like unexpected windfall to be amazing in my version of the deck.

  • @KarakuriKing44
    @KarakuriKing44 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Can't wait for sultai rat tribal deck.

  • @kaemonbonet4931
    @kaemonbonet4931 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This deck is so cool. Play shark typhoon getting the prowess trigger, attack recasting wandering emporer and creating a shark token

  • @breakingthewall2112
    @breakingthewall2112 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic gaming CGB love this style of play

  • @KriusAerion
    @KriusAerion ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If I see the name Narset on the table, every piece of removal I have is reserved just for it. Idc which version it is, I'm tramatized.

    • @Kestral287
      @Kestral287 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nah that's honestly pretty fair. Parter can be okay for some scenarios to leave in play if it's hating someone else more than you but that's about the most friendly one and it's still terrifying.

  • @wykydtron
    @wykydtron ปีที่แล้ว

    Those last two games were wild

  • @tacothursdays6546
    @tacothursdays6546 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fuck me this looks awesome.
    I'd love to see your take on the new 5 Color Niv-Mizzet from Mom Aftermath👀

  • @claytonhanson6438
    @claytonhanson6438 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I feel the pain on the heliods intervention whiff. Happens the the best of us man, you're still one of the best players to watch, don't sweat it bro!

    • @larrygreen7062
      @larrygreen7062 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Did anyone else notice he coulda cast it for x=0 to at least get a prowess trigger for extra damage?

  • @kylebuck9716
    @kylebuck9716 ปีที่แล้ว

    No lie, I was excited for this. I built the deck but I'm 0-11 idk if I'm not understanding the flow but I can't get this deck to pop off.

  • @lonelongboarder27
    @lonelongboarder27 ปีที่แล้ว

    When in doubt on sequencing, hard cast shark typhoon and make sharks.

  • @alexanderforbes1452
    @alexanderforbes1452 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Narset is a frustrating one for Arena because it doesn't have that full history of Magic to pull from, I was shocked by how few one mana cantrips there were, even good two mana ones are scarce. My whole strategy was to rattle off a few cantrips every turn to make her big and cast some decent stuff from the graveyard, not even big stuff, there aren't many spells that we can't catch even without any prowess triggers. It can work, if things line up we can just finish them in a couple swings, but it's a lot harder than it would be in paper. Some commanders don't really suffer too much from the more limited card pool, but I feel like Narset as built on Arena and Narset as built in paper is not just on a whole other level but in a totally different solar system. It's not a flub, don't get me wrong, but in paper this thing could be pretty degenerate.

    • @tonysmith9905
      @tonysmith9905 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well you also have the problem that commander is against 4 players while this is just a 1v1. You don't wanna flood your deck with a whole bunch of cantrips that don't really do any thing. Even in normal commander you don't wanna do that. So sure, paper she'd have some more cantrips to go off with, but you still wouldn't run that many of them.

    • @DHGcrimson
      @DHGcrimson ปีที่แล้ว

      Narset cantrips will only be good on brawl im building a paper version all cards bought minus basic lands and some commons uncommons from commander legends.
      Deck will be just shy of $900 bucks paper

  • @jacobmeagher
    @jacobmeagher ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This card is very reminiscent of the old Narset enlightened master, just a bit more balanced

  • @RKGrizz
    @RKGrizz ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is this the kind of deck you would build for Narset in Commander? I have a foil etched Narset and have been looking for a Jeskai commander for a while so I am wondering how people would build her.

  • @t-dogn6171
    @t-dogn6171 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks CGB. Always entertaining.

  • @KingKj52
    @KingKj52 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the HisBrawl since I can't afford paper magic for proper commander. Appreciate it

  • @dens2002
    @dens2002 ปีที่แล้ว

    Alternative strategy: cloning the commander with Vesuvan duplimancy, Vile duplication spark double, helm of the host... Fun times!

  • @patrickwoodlands4086
    @patrickwoodlands4086 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm shocked you do not have the cosmetic for Command Tower yet seeing as how much you enjoy HB these days. It was one of the first cosmetics I got when I got into HB as it goes into every deck that isn't mono color.

  • @sh4dow666
    @sh4dow666 ปีที่แล้ว

    54:23 Discontinuity would have been *really* good there... (I know it was in the graveyard, but it's probably the only solution at that point)

  • @thekwjiboo
    @thekwjiboo ปีที่แล้ว

    That decks looks like maximum fun without being so weak it's unplayable.

  • @michaelgilbert5224
    @michaelgilbert5224 ปีที่แล้ว

    love to see Narset getting attention again

  • @UEENavy
    @UEENavy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Historic brawl is the best MTG arena format

  • @Herudaio
    @Herudaio 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How would you update the deck with the recent sets?

  • @DukaM9432
    @DukaM9432 ปีที่แล้ว

    Artistic finish 🤌 that was fun to watch

  • @astrowerm
    @astrowerm ปีที่แล้ว

    yeah that sucks, anything cast for free, X is always zero unless theres a static tax on spells

  • @butdoesitscrub3457
    @butdoesitscrub3457 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is standard brawl good

  • @danlewis7707
    @danlewis7707 ปีที่แล้ว

    Playing a spell means paying a cost. Playing it without paying it's cost is an alternative cost. A spell may be paid for only once. The alternative cost is zero ergo all x cost spells cast without paying mana cost are zero as the cost paid is zero.

  • @nooby900
    @nooby900 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for more brawl

  • @milesstone2501
    @milesstone2501 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice deck

  • @albertsiltal2600
    @albertsiltal2600 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is m my Son. 😇

  • @CristianCiotti
    @CristianCiotti ปีที่แล้ว

    Already faced this commander 5 or 6 times on the queue. Definitely the most annoying one of the new ones.

  • @AkodoNoEyes
    @AkodoNoEyes ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it just me or does the new Narset art make her look like an adult Haley from Modern Family?

  • @emersoncollazo1875
    @emersoncollazo1875 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who else heard the OMG it's lighting helix!!!!

  • @ZombieWolvez55
    @ZombieWolvez55 ปีที่แล้ว

    your the best cgb!

  • @maaikevreugdemaker9210
    @maaikevreugdemaker9210 ปีที่แล้ว

    35:00 without paying its mana cost lol.. you cant pay x because you would be paying its mana cost

  • @PC-ln5kx
    @PC-ln5kx ปีที่แล้ว

    great

  • @jjf414
    @jjf414 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ur cool

  • @DingleBottomFilms
    @DingleBottomFilms ปีที่แล้ว

    u rock

  • @widalplays631
    @widalplays631 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video...watched it like 3 times

    • @Neiros2
      @Neiros2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Impressive that you managed to watch a 57 minute video 3 times in the first 2 minutes after it was posted.

    • @TheFenixDown206
      @TheFenixDown206 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@Neiros2 why you do that boy like that 😅

    • @widalplays631
      @widalplays631 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Neiros2 Thanks!!

  • @colindewnarain74
    @colindewnarain74 ปีที่แล้ว

    In covertgocrew commander games when someone talks cgb lip syncs them

  • @stefanemodi
    @stefanemodi ปีที่แล้ว

    third

  • @dadebutler2383
    @dadebutler2383 ปีที่แล้ว

    Day 41 of asking CGB to make a shrines deck video. Games start at 4:13