This is my dream team for taskmaster !! both teams and David Mitchell .The five of them would make the funniest taskmaster contestants ever !!! Please Alex work some magic and get this lot on
David Mitchell has already been asked to be on Taskmaster and said no: "I've been asked and I've said 'no thanks', explained Mitchell. 'It's a very good show but I don't want to be on it. My feeling is that I'd be shit but not in a funny way.'"
"Uncut," and yet it clearly is. You can see that Robert Webb has teared up at some point, which is very strange if you don't know about the Tom Cruise thing.
I find it revealing about David Mitchell that he hasn't heard of de Montaigne thus proving, if proof were needed, that poshness and intellectualism are not the same thing
True dat. He also thought atheists absolutely denied the existence of a god, rather than just denying the validity of any 'evidence' which 'proves' his/her/its existence.
@@urbanskiboguslabsrecording7531 Had I meant omniscience I would have written omniscience but thanks so much for joining in. I'm sure we are all elevated by your input.
It's ironic that you're trying to bash Mitchell for being 'posh' here, when using such pretentious phrasing. It's also revealing of course, that you believe somebody can only be 'intellectual' if the grounds of their intellectual experience are the same as yours.
@@pseudonayme7717 The meaning of the word 'atheist' has *always* meant to deny god. If 'you atheists' who have discovered the ridiculous childishness & arrogance of your earlier position want to redefine the word.. tough shit. Get another one. Frankly though, your phrasing shows you are still the old breed. No doubt you claim to be some variant of scientific rationalist when you say such things as 'denying the validity of any evidence which proves x.' Your position is no more based in factual observance or rigorous analysis than the most backwards of theists.
No there's not, it's equivalent to saying there's only one way to drive on a public highway in the county of Devon. If one assumes many things, such as wanting as little damage to skin & underlying tissue as possible, wanting to use blades as opposed to chemicals, etc etc ad nauseum.. then one might eventually say there is a 'best way,' but it is not the same thing as there being 'one way.'
and of course, it was Hawking who ended up in an electric chair.......BTW....not a very great physicist (ask Susskind....), Hawking spent years trying to discredit Susskind's work, then gave a lecture where he "claimed" to have "proved" that Susskind was right after all
The $60K dollar question is: Would Sylvester Stallone be considered a ''genius'' if he had died JUST after First Blood? Rocky #1 got three Oscars, while Rambo was a world wide blockbuster earning hundreds of millions. These two films combined make Sly a very talented almost a genius level writer and director considering his age. Maybe like Jim Morrison or Janice Joplin he'd have been thought more highly of if he'd snuffed mid 80's?
No. One successful film does not make a genius, as his subsequent career path demonstrates. Talented with much potential in 1975 maybe. If he had directed too, and gone on to write and direct further Oscar winners then the case could be made. But really, no. As for his paintings... discuss!
@@domb8448 You seem to be (wilfully) entirely missing the point - which is that when people 'snuff it' after a partial, critical or cult success - they're often given credit for a future that never existed(So often it's not just normal, it's almost guaranteed). Hell, it even happens with people whose careers die a death but for whom, for one reason or another- people choose to credit their failures to something other than themselves.. such as when people blame 'alcohol/drugs/bad relationships' for the failure of a given person's career, when every person who succeeds has to succeed through their own often similar troubles. Of course this love affair with the counterfactual/ridiculous predictions based on spotty & almost irrelevant data is not exclusive to actors & directors... Still though, the kind of people that pretentiously call artists 'genius' for doing what millions of others would if they had the time, support & funding.. are not the kind of people to hail Rambo or any of Stallone's pictures even good, because true 'art' & 'genius' are not supposed to be penetrated by the unpretentious, they have to be in some way exclusive.. & for the true critic.. arbitrarily exclusive is the best kind.
I assume you mean First Blood, not 'Rambo 1'. I think Stallone made a conscious choice to go the route of creating an image as an action star and making a ton of money rather than pursuing more artistically satisfying work. He could have gone either way, as his performance in CopLand attests. But most people even now don't remember how good those early films were. If he'd died then, I think he'd be largely forgotten by now.
@@WalterLiddy you picked the perfect image Walter, Mitchell is a pedant and he'd make the same critique. I changed it to First Blood just for you. Thanks for the heads up. Copland was well made, and it did showcase his talents, but I think Rambo and all his work including The Expendables actually represent his "artistically satisfying" efforts. Andy Warhol painted soup cans, I don't like the images, don't care for his vision, but that's Andy's work. I don't think Stallone's case is like that of Scott Fitzgerald who wound up typing out scripts for Hollywood shows long after The Great Gatsby was ''borne back ceaselessly into the past.''
I wonder if Stephen Hawking was developmentally disabled as well as physically disabled. Not reading until eight years old, when you have access to educational resources and aren't being neglected/abused, is a developmental delay. I am developmentally disabled (definitely ADHD, probably autistic) and had similar delays as a child, but I am not intellectually disabled and have a vast array of knowledge about my special interests. My mom is also developmentally disabled and has sIBM, a rare form of muscular dystrophy described as a slower version of ALS. I need to Google 1) whether Stephen Hawking was developmentally disabled / neurodivergent and 2) if there is a link between developmental disability / neurodivergency and muscular dystrophy.
"Prevalence of Neuropsychiatric Disorders in Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis" published in 2022 in the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation found a high rate of ADHD and autism in participants with juvenile muscular dystrophy. Fascinating
Three of them have degrees from Cambridge University, so I doubt it. But I also don’t know if you’re being sarcastic, as sarcasm doesn’t read well over text in some instances.
@@danielarthur3137 Stallone is worth over $400 million totally self made. Three degrees from Cambridge equals no more than one expert on buggery. You can move along now.
@@ZIGSVIDS Because, of course, money is the ultimate gauge for intelligence and personal fulfillment. It's why every football team in Europe is filled to the brim with geniuses.
![ไลฟ์สุ่ม iPhone 295 บาท... โกงมั้ย?[ โกงมั้ยครับ ep.97 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/gdstHEE4UUE/mqdefault.jpg)
This was one of, if not the best Quiz shows on TV. The team was perfect.....
Why didn't they continue this.. Such a shame.
Richard talking about the M.L.King quote: "Because ........ four children, that's no picnic!"
David Mitchell: "Only for a cannibal!" 🤭😅🤣
Eeeeoooo nails on a chalkboard! David, you were SO correct that the quote including "wet otters" being GRIM!
David Mitchell: "Can I have the first of your final answers please?" 😂
I could listen to Charles read a cereal box
They need to give Charles Dance a lordship.
Lord of the Dance?
Or he could pay the 36 quid like anyone can aha
@@HerbertAckermans , they need to give Charles Lord a danceship
why is this just the same episode 3 times lol i thought it was an extra long special or something 🥲
just noticed this channel has reuploaded the same couple episodes several times, very weird
This is my dream team for taskmaster !! both teams and David Mitchell .The five of them would make the funniest taskmaster contestants ever !!! Please Alex work some magic and get this lot on
yaaaaaassssss
David Mitchell has already been asked to be on Taskmaster and said no:
"I've been asked and I've said 'no thanks', explained Mitchell. 'It's a very good show but I don't want to be on it. My feeling is that I'd be shit but not in a funny way.'"
I'm loving Miles Jupp and Mickey Flanagan on the panel of anything cause they have my two favorite laughs in all of UK comedy
My God this absolutely needs to happen it would be fantastic but they're all men so won't happen probably
Charles Dance looks like Hugh Dennis’s older brother.
Ive seen Charles Dance in many interviews when he is wearing a t-shirt and jeans.
Charles dance is so hot
"Uncut," and yet it clearly is. You can see that Robert Webb has teared up at some point, which is very strange if you don't know about the Tom Cruise thing.
th-cam.com/video/q2RjEakTkMs/w-d-xo.html
To be optimistic though, at least he didn't say glistening like moist Otters.
1:55 I love this response
Now the idea of R Kelly jumping off a school roof chasing something has a slightly different connotation....
Old Charles is a class act.kkeps it real
I find it revealing about David Mitchell that he hasn't heard of de Montaigne thus proving, if proof were needed, that poshness and intellectualism are not the same thing
True dat. He also thought atheists absolutely denied the existence of a god, rather than just denying the validity of any 'evidence' which 'proves' his/her/its existence.
@@urbanskiboguslabsrecording7531 Had I meant omniscience I would have written omniscience but thanks so much for joining in. I'm sure we are all elevated by your input.
David Michell is not 'posh'.
And no, proof was never needed, we have the House of Commons.
It's ironic that you're trying to bash Mitchell for being 'posh' here, when using such pretentious phrasing. It's also revealing of course, that you believe somebody can only be 'intellectual' if the grounds of their intellectual experience are the same as yours.
@@pseudonayme7717 The meaning of the word 'atheist' has *always* meant to deny god. If 'you atheists' who have discovered the ridiculous childishness & arrogance of your earlier position want to redefine the word.. tough shit. Get another one.
Frankly though, your phrasing shows you are still the old breed. No doubt you claim to be some variant of scientific rationalist when you say such things as 'denying the validity of any evidence which proves x.' Your position is no more based in factual observance or rigorous analysis than the most backwards of theists.
There is actually only one way to skin a cat. Had to take a comparative anatomy course where we dissected cats.
No there's not, it's equivalent to saying there's only one way to drive on a public highway in the county of Devon. If one assumes many things, such as wanting as little damage to skin & underlying tissue as possible, wanting to use blades as opposed to chemicals, etc etc ad nauseum.. then one might eventually say there is a 'best way,' but it is not the same thing as there being 'one way.'
A catfish. To skin a catfish is what the saying is means.
Richard is so cute he was distracting me.
"TaDaaah!"
Roy's first words after coming out of his' coma.
🙂
8:47 Those are dead on impressions that Charles Dance does of Roger Moore and John Glen.
Mike Tyson keeps pigeons? Does he keep them longer than a fortnight?
and of course, it was Hawking who ended up in an electric chair.......BTW....not a very great physicist (ask Susskind....), Hawking spent years trying to discredit Susskind's work, then gave a lecture where he "claimed" to have "proved" that Susskind was right after all
😂 electric chair
Power chair*
An electric chair kills you. A power chair helps you live your life.
The $60K dollar question is: Would Sylvester Stallone be considered a ''genius'' if he had died JUST after First Blood? Rocky #1 got three Oscars, while Rambo was a world wide blockbuster earning hundreds of millions. These two films combined make Sly a very talented almost a genius level writer and director considering his age. Maybe like Jim Morrison or Janice Joplin he'd have been thought more highly of if he'd snuffed mid 80's?
No. One successful film does not make a genius, as his subsequent career path demonstrates. Talented with much potential in 1975 maybe. If he had directed too, and gone on to write and direct further Oscar winners then the case could be made. But really, no. As for his paintings... discuss!
@@domb8448 You seem to be (wilfully) entirely missing the point - which is that when people 'snuff it' after a partial, critical or cult success - they're often given credit for a future that never existed(So often it's not just normal, it's almost guaranteed). Hell, it even happens with people whose careers die a death but for whom, for one reason or another- people choose to credit their failures to something other than themselves.. such as when people blame 'alcohol/drugs/bad relationships' for the failure of a given person's career, when every person who succeeds has to succeed through their own often similar troubles.
Of course this love affair with the counterfactual/ridiculous predictions based on spotty & almost irrelevant data is not exclusive to actors & directors...
Still though, the kind of people that pretentiously call artists 'genius' for doing what millions of others would if they had the time, support & funding.. are not the kind of people to hail Rambo or any of Stallone's pictures even good, because true 'art' & 'genius' are not supposed to be penetrated by the unpretentious, they have to be in some way exclusive.. & for the true critic.. arbitrarily exclusive is the best kind.
I assume you mean First Blood, not 'Rambo 1'. I think Stallone made a conscious choice to go the route of creating an image as an action star and making a ton of money rather than pursuing more artistically satisfying work. He could have gone either way, as his performance in CopLand attests. But most people even now don't remember how good those early films were. If he'd died then, I think he'd be largely forgotten by now.
@@WalterLiddy you picked the perfect image Walter, Mitchell is a pedant and he'd make the same critique. I changed it to First Blood just for you. Thanks for the heads up.
Copland was well made, and it did showcase his talents, but I think Rambo and all his work including The Expendables actually represent his "artistically satisfying" efforts. Andy Warhol painted soup cans, I don't like the images, don't care for his vision, but that's Andy's work.
I don't think Stallone's case is like that of Scott Fitzgerald who wound up typing out scripts for Hollywood shows long after The Great Gatsby was ''borne back ceaselessly into the past.''
As long as Siegfried is ok3
Hello
Does anyone else see Webb's resemblance to a younger, less cynical John Malkovitch?
Sadly it was Hawkins that ended up in the electric chair.
Is Charles Dance the father of Robert Webb ?
I would watch that show.
I wonder if Stephen Hawking was developmentally disabled as well as physically disabled.
Not reading until eight years old, when you have access to educational resources and aren't being neglected/abused, is a developmental delay.
I am developmentally disabled (definitely ADHD, probably autistic) and had similar delays as a child, but I am not intellectually disabled and have a vast array of knowledge about my special interests.
My mom is also developmentally disabled and has sIBM, a rare form of muscular dystrophy described as a slower version of ALS.
I need to Google 1) whether Stephen Hawking was developmentally disabled / neurodivergent and 2) if there is a link between developmental disability / neurodivergency and muscular dystrophy.
The internet says Hawking had ADHD, but I can't find him talking about it
"Prevalence of Neuropsychiatric Disorders in Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis"
published in 2022 in the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
found a high rate of ADHD and autism in participants with juvenile muscular dystrophy.
Fascinating
2nd
Mocking Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. is not cool. Or funny. At all.
Boohoo
Stallone's more intelligent than any on that panel.
Three of them have degrees from Cambridge University, so I doubt it. But I also don’t know if you’re being sarcastic, as sarcasm doesn’t read well over text in some instances.
@@danielarthur3137 Stallone is worth over $400 million totally self made.
Three degrees from Cambridge equals no more than one expert on buggery.
You can move along now.
@@ZIGSVIDS Because, of course, money is the ultimate gauge for intelligence and personal fulfillment. It's why every football team in Europe is filled to the brim with geniuses.
@@soppero No Intelligence is defined by how many times the uppity fools been on a stupid English panel show.
You can move on now.
@@ZIGSVIDS if money defines intelligence, then I feel very sorry for you
2nd