And when you are Greek and all the "big words" are just made of simple small greek words combined, like light and composition which is photosynthesis xD
I'm fine with sci-fi being completely unrealistic. I mean, like many, I loved Stargate! What I really dislike though is when sci-fi pretends to be realistic while being blatantly incorrect about physics. Because that's not only dishonest, it is how you get the worst misconceptions into the minds of the general public. That just makes me mad.
I get what you mean and agree. we should kinda differentiate between genres more precisely though. A lot of stuff that is sold as Sci-Fi is actually Science Fantasy or Utopic Action/Horror or simply Drama set in a more or less distant future
Ever talked to non-KSP people about space? One guy told me that spaceships have spinning centrifuge things to create artificial gravity to keep them from falling back down to earth. That's not even a movie misconception, some people just won't understand things whether you present it accurately or not.
A realistic plot wouldn't have worked because "an asteroid will kill earth in 10 years" doesn't sound terrifying. You would probably not even get a call with the President for that.
Yeah because they can calculate if a Jupiter flyby asteroid gonna collide with Earth but they couldn't figure out which way it's gonna go after they deflect it.
The only way I can think to make a killer asteroid movie (or show) be interesting again would be if it was set in the 1960's. Then there would be a good explanation as to why we have a low velocity impact we didn't see until it was almost too late, the tension of the US and the USSR being forced to work together would give plenty of intrigue, and of course this would be an excellent excuse to have famous astronauts like Neil Armstrong and Yuri Gagarin be stars in a modern movie.
it depends when the series is set, if the series is set before korolev died then it would go very well, soviet spacecraft only started to explode and fail when mishin started to lead the space program
Nothing will ever beat "2012" for its inaccuracies, the main one being the very first line..."the neutrinos are mutating" (Thanks to Ferrari 312T4 for pointing out my mistake)
Haha. It triggered all kind of weird effects when I teleported my transport ant to mun to test if it could move my connection rubes and connect it to the base modules. What a horrible creative painful way to build a modular station.
Scrolling text transcribed: "Like the character that was killed by Polonium poisoning, which will kill you but was mainly used because it is super secret and hard for an autopsy to spot unless they knew to look for radiation, So why would a government sponsored assassin kill someone in Russia with polonium when they could just off them by a more conventional method and then trust the local coroner to do whatever their bosses told them to. "And then you have the Chelyabinsk being used as a weapon to destroy some secret Russian/Chinese project that must have been hidden in a lake because that's where the biggest chunk of Chelyabinsk ended up. "Then there's the Uranium stealing sequence where they relocate the WIPP from New Mexico to Maryland because they didn't bother to look up Wikipedia."
That scrolling text at the bottom of the screen is very hard to read because you're trying to listen what Scott is saying at the same time. Not so good of a decision in my opinion.
Agreed, not the best choice. Would be better broken out as a segment at the end to music or something if time was too short or it was too much trouble to narrate is on its own.
+Enceos The fields of editing and graphic design have many ways of presenting information so that the viewer can absorb it like a normal person without having to split attention or replay the video or whatever. Scott should have used his mighty brain for figuring that out. It's not like he couldn't have just shot an additional talking head scene with the information in, if it's that important.
I remember saying half way through the first season that the asteroid wasn't an asteroid. What wasn't clear is whether it was a figment (not really there) or something else. They answered that pretty conclusively in season finale this year. On the other hand, it's still not clear exactly what it is. Probably a space craft of some kind, but beyond that, it's not clear.
a choice between the asteroid hitting the earth and killing everything ( a very terminal end of series) , and a hail-mary alien spaceship twist leaving room for further series - I've got a better one though: The smart kid teleports the asteroid into the Game of Thrones universe just before episode 3 of the last series - 'Oh no the army of the dead has broken into Winterfell!! what shall we do? Whats that roaring sound?' KABOOM
Couldn't stand Salvation. Terrible science, and worse than that, terrible characters. "Oh no, we're all going to die in 6 months" kind of lacks punch when your first thought is "oh, good".
Yup it's like "We are all gonna die in 6 months unless we as nations all work together"..they think about it for 5 mins then....."Nah, lets just speed up our extinction with a nuclear war first." Or the "We can't give up our humanity and torture people or kill folks even if it helps us save ALL humanity."
Me, watching scifi as a child: "Wow, science is so cool! I'm going to be a scientist when I grow up!" Me, watching scifi 20 years later: "I hate this garbage. Rockets don't work like that. Hey, that space guy uploaded on youtube."
Do what I did years (no, decades) ago: Throw over entirely ANY idea of learning real science FROM sci-fi. That is NOT what it is good for. What Sci-fi does best, is to ASSUME some "science" or future state, and then explore what happens to "normal" people and situations if you carry such an assumption through in the story (no confusion here: it's just a STORY). But as to "rockets don't work that way," why stress? That's not what the story is about, it's just a bright crayon to add color.
OR, you could do what I think any responsible person would do, if faced with the same gap between story and reality: Get some Science Education (it's fascinating AND informative, dude!), so that YOU will know the difference. I almost always know what's bunk on first viewing, which is a MUCH better tack to take, because it doesn't let the LIES circulate through my tender thinking apparatus in the meantime (the longer and less internally monitored LIES are, the greater effects they WILL have in there: better to kill them off in the cradle, so you can continue to RELY on their truth-content). And my achievement (preserving what remains of my part of WISDOM is definitely an achievement) is due because I paid attention in my science classes, and have never stopped READING.
Now I want to write a book or a movie that follows a similar premise - someone finds something weird in the data, announces that an asteroid is going to hit the earth and wipe out all life, and give a short time frame - 180 days or so. Focus on everyone freaking out, the human element, people killing themselves and their families, or collapsing into despondency, all of these frantic things happening... and then the asteroid misses the Earth, because the guy was just wrong. And the moral is about responsible reporting and considering that hysterical reporting often does more harm than good, because now they have to clean up after the hysteria.
To be honest, you could just write about the people who actually did kill themselves over conspiracy nonsense involving the large hadron collider, or 2012, or any of the other shit.
@@DatAlien To be fair it's been 20 damn years since the wakefield study, it's been discredited over and over again, and yet people are still losing their shit over it. With the general distrust of authority we have these days I'm sure there'd still be plenty of apocalypse culting.
you could even let the truth come out about 20% into the book but no-one takes it seriously because the sensationalist media ignores it and everyone thinks its the government trying to calm the situation.
I remember giving up on Salvation in the first episode. As someone trying to become an actual Aerospace Engineer, the repeated instance of hearing people talk about stuff they obviously don't understand drove me off before the intrigue was supposed to even start.
It's the exact same thing in car and tech movies. Just move the plot and don't talk tech. I love the one where they're pulling data from the dude's hard drive and the agent hands the other one the power supply.
@Mike Fortune he ain't no film expert and he ain't tryna be. He's trying to be an aerospace engineer so he probably doesn't care about plot as much as you do. People like you don't understand the topics they're talking about, and there is nothing wrong with that. Just don't be a dickhead on the internet
@@glenwaldrop8166 absolutely they are teying to put all math and science just for a show? Its for entertainment purpose not for education in schools. Damn just watch the show like you watch iron man.
@@9999905422 It takes about two seconds to identify a hard drive vs a power supply. It's about the same as calling a woman a man or a dog a tree. It's lazy writing. As for Iron Man, early on in the MCU, Iron Man tech was flirting with what we're actually capable of *if* we had some kind of absolutely insane power source so *I am* watching it just like I do Iron Man.
Some of this is solvable! Just assume the altitude during the launch sequence is entirely accurate and they built a 20 km tall rocket, then figure out if the mass of said rocket is enough for the gravity tractor. :D
Sure, and the collision knocks the moon out of it's orbit and it collides with Earth, which then diverts from it's orbit and collides with Venus, which is knocked out of it's orbit and collides with Mercury, and you get a domino effect that wipes out the entire solar system. Think man, THINK!!
It would be as simple as turning the Moon-holograph projector... but we know that holograms don't have mass so can't effect asteroids...unless the asteroid was just a holographic projection...so the hero just needs to locate and turn off the asteroid holograph projector but then the holographic asteroid was never a threat in the first place. Well, thank the Flying Spaghetti Monster! We don't need a space program to protect ourselves from holographic asteroids. And the dinosaurs are a hoax along with the Chicxulub impactor.
Wouldn't hobby astronomers find a 7 km object close to Jupiter? Considering that Jupiter is a likely target of observation and Hobby astronomers find asteroids all the time? Especially considering the high Albedo shown in these clips o.O
No. The vast, vast majority of telescopes amateur astronomers use (bearing in mind, most won't even go as far as 12-inch diameter, and diameter is what determines light-gathering power - bigger diameter = more light = seeing dimmer objects. Don't even begin to consider magnification - even the four Gallilean moons in a 12 inch telescope with an 8 mm eyepiece and Barlow lens appear as *point sources*) can't even see Amalthea, the 5th biggest moon of Jupiter (250 km x 146 km x 128 km), and the last satellite discovered by visual observation (by one Edward Emerson Barnard, who was working at the Lick Observatory at the time, with a 36-inch telescope). Funny enough, there *is* a 7 km diameter moon of Jupiter - Praxidike, discovered by a team of astronomers from the University of Hawai'i headed by Scott S. Sheppard in 2000, using the University of Hawai'i 88-inch telescope at the Mauna Kea Observatories. Source: I'm a member of the Barnard Astronomical Society and regularly use a 12-inch telescope, often looking at Jupiter while it's up because it's one of the more spectacular targets to show people. That and Wikipedia for most of the actual data.
HELL no. A 7km asteroid next to jupiter is less bright than the planet by a factor of more than two trillion. That's like seeing one cigarette ember against the backdrop of an exploding Hiroshima-size nuke. . A telescope in Hubble's class, with weeks of observations, *might* see it. . Hint: you don't want to look right next to a bright object, while searching a very faint one!
12:17 Well, as you said, the rocket travelled 10 km in 3 seconds. And when you look at the image, that seems to be less than the length of the rocket. So I estimate that the rocket is at least 20-30 km long. So I don't have a big problem with it having to weigh 100.000 tons. Seems legit.
ComandanteJ then the Expanse gets picked up by the richest man in America whose business got started selling books. But the president of the USA is raging against him on Twitter. This plot is more unrealistic than a TV show.
Space is black. Plot holes are black. You can fit a really big plothole in space and nobody would know. It is hard to fathom just how big of a plothole can fit in sppace.
I was just recommended this after bingewatching The Expanse stuff. I'm so glad we got a series with so much more attention to actual physics - obviously it's not 100% realistic either, but there are so many amazing details in there that actually make sense. Down to little things like a little background graphic of an interplanetary railgun's aim accounting for the gravity of the sun.
It didn't even LOOK like an EM Drive... it had a rocket nozzle for crying out loud! The EM drive is a CLOSED SYSTEM, it HAS NO NOZZLE! Also, the nozzle is cone shaped, not bell shaped.
wait... isnt a cone shaped nozzle exactly how the em drive was supposed to work...? to bounce microwave waves off the copper at an outwards angle to generate thrust?
I don't think the EM drive explosion is all that far-fetched. If you dump enough electrical energy into a piece of copper, it can become very explodey and flamey. The idea of an EM drive actually *working* is, of course. complete fantasy.
I tried to read and listen, sadly i have ADD (no not commercials/adds). Its hard to watch a movie, read the translation and listen to the actors! As i gave this Mel Gibson Jesus movie to my mother, very religious, she didnt like it. She said "its bad, i cant watch it and read, on or the other but not both, why didnt they make a translation like in every other movie?" Well original language was aramaic, dont think that anyone today speaks that perfectly!
@10:05, can someone calculate the extreme acceleration of that probe based on the decrease of apparent size of Jupiter from that mounted camera? That just looks so ridiculous. Amazing video Scott, and I will definitely... ...fly safe.
WoaH! Good point. That thing is going from apparently stationary, to WELL OVER lightspeed, in under a second. (its leaving Jupiter at a rate of about many jupiter radii per second)
HAHA i thought the same when the probe was leaving earth... like, it turns on an emdrive, a supposedly low thrust system, and its already going faster than the speed of light
Go easy on the CGI team. Many people who work in this area (like myself) are serious science nerds, dot product vector maths used in light path rendering being an example of what I mean. Chances are, someone in the CGI team would have politely pointed out that Jupiter was nowhere near the asteroid but the producers/art directors would have told them to shut up and deliver what they were paid to do. The fact that a respected science bod was consulted, and obviously ignored/overriden in many cases and what I know of the typical production process leads me to believe this. However, this is one of the less egregious examples of ignoring reality, given that people don’t want to see a screen with tiny distant dots on a black field in their TV shows. A similar argument could be made for the exploding EM ‘drive’. A big explosion is much more ‘cinematic’ than a simple burnout. The falsity in the orbital graphics and launch display of 10km in 3 seconds are another story - there is no argument that falsifying reality improves the story in these cases. And that’s the 2D compositing team, a different lot to the CGI people. Even so, there’s probably some story of a demo that was liked by the producers who didn’t want to bother creating an accurate final so a dodgy demo was overlaid on the screens and ended up in the release. The producers are responsible for everything wrong here - the poor saps who do the actual work typically do as they are told, being subcontractors and freelancers. The traditional, so called creative types typically wear their science ignorance on their sleeves, although this is getting better than it used to be 20 or more years ago.
13:00 you kinda miss anouther sin; the material would change nothing but its volume given the gravitional model was used to find its Mass... Also how the hell is all this being tracked? Is this an AU where Space Stituational Awareness and astroid warning is taken seriously? Plus predicting anythings velocity to within an error on the magnitude of 0.42m/s over six months, especially when you have limited observations prior to that plus it's in deep space plus on a hyperbolic trajectory... I won't bore people with details about orbit determination but if it's accurate to within a m/s over six months for an object out at jupiter on a hyperbolic trajectory just imagine how accurately you could model satellite orbits over short term periods.
Saimons ... To be fair position, speed and acceleration of very distant spacecraft are being determined down to the 5th or 6th decimal place in m/s. The Pioneer anomaly was detected when the spacecraft was about 100 metres off of its predicted trajectory all while being 30+ AU away from us. Things like determining the density of Europa and Enceladus were done by carefully tracking acceleration of spacecraft that were 5 and 10 AU out from the sun. Of course, on the other-other hand, these were measurements taken of highly instrumented spacecraft that were broadcasting on known radio frequencies. Asteroids are lumpy, bumpy chunks of stuff whose composition isn't precisely known so measurement error bars are going to be much larger than for spacecraft we built ourselves.
I was looking EXACTLY for something like that when I finished watching. A reputable space guy that really knows alot talking about a series about space that gets so much weird
...Ignore the many obvious problem both simple and complicated to have, here's a question: Supposed you planted a magnet near a skyscrapper made out of iron, which would be more likely to move: the skyscrapper toward you, or the magnet toward the tower? Edit: also, sarcasm detected.
minh khang tran it would work similar to gravity in this case. Both toward each other, with lighter object moving faster. Just slap rockets on the magnets man!
You still have to make a magnet strong enough to worth the effort (TL;DR, but the tech would have been ridiculously revolutinary), not to mention the magnet itself don't interfere with both the electronic on board, and the frikkin orbital path of the satelite in the first place, lest the mag-telite attract itself and crash into the asteroid.
If I recall, Liam (the MIT student) actually thought about magnets in the last episode of the season. He said something to his girlfriend about magnets, then said "I need to tell Darius (genius CEO guy) about this."
As a film grad I can tell you that sci-fi is about Moral Dilemmas. That's the narrative drive of sci-fi shows. That's why it's called Science *Fiction* Its not meant to be a lecture but a backdrop to study human moral behaviour. That's it. The characters explored in the show present different moral values. That's the point. For all I care, the asteroid could have been a block of cheese I don't care. It's people like this who are ruining shows chances.
Another idea: Since the earth represents a moving target, in the best case you "just have to delay" the asteroid. Earth moves with ~30km/s, the earths diameter equals 12000km, so if you manage to delay the arrival by 400 seconds, the asteroid will miss earth. When the asteroid reaches the "impact point" earth simply will no longer be there. Of course this would also work in the other direction. Instead of "braking" the asteroid, speed it up such that earth will not yet have reached the impact position, when the asteroid passes. Thus by choosing either acceleration or deceleration you would have to manipulate the asteroids traveling time "only" by a maximum of 200 seconds.
Ah, this is where this number came from in the video! It was not clear to me how you came up with it. I thought it to be some sideways acceleration to bend the path. Thanks for clearification. (and you are right. I have not done the math. mea culpa)
I think what Scott is saying is that the extra velocity you need to apply to the asteroid can be in any arbitrary direction, including forward, backward or sideways. Distance = speed x time, and the objective here is to cause a certain change in distance of the impact point in any direction, within a given timeframe.
So, long story short: plotholes big enough to throw that 7 km asteroid into without scraping the edges, saving Earth in the process 😁… and I had never heard of this series before having Scott's video pop up in my subscriptions… Thanks, Scott - this'll be at least something to laugh at, when it crops up 'round these parts 😀👍
That recent comet from interstellar space a few weeks ago, I find it super cool. (I mean it probably is with the ice and all), but if there are lots of these events around the galaxy, it suddenly becomes a massive game of interstellar pinball with thousands, maybe millions of tiny rocks trying to get to the center of the galaxy as fast as possible.
It’ll turn out to be Fear the Skies, and Samson’s actually a whole bunch of littler objects, each carrying a powerful alien android as a prelude to a major invasion force!
Based on measurements attained through precise instrumentation at the 11:54 mark of this video ("my fingers pressed against my monitor"), I've determined that the rocket is almost exactly 9 kilometers long. _Edit: I failed to take into account that the altimeter is probably in the nose, whoops. 9km seems the correct, corrected length._
i work in film and these sorts of issues indicate a half-arsed production team. the existence of a video like this indicates a horribly sloppy screw-up of a production and massive financial mismanagement. the whole point of film is 'suspension of disbelief' - 100% fail. Great video as always Mr Manley, appreciate the time you took to straighten this idiotic mess.
Far, far more than all of them. Increasing the rotation rate of the planet to once every 84 minutes would put everything on the surface of the planet into orbit.
This reminds me of a game called INTERPLANETARY. It's pretty fun. I don't actually own it but I remember playing it on a free weekend or something a year ago. It's like battleship meets Civilization. It's a turn based space game where your civilization on one planet is at war with civilizations / colonies on other planets and you have to account for the movement of all the planets and large objects when you fire to try to bombard the planets surface and hit their facilities. A late game super weapon was slinging asteroids from the asteroid belt that are hard to predict and slow but have huge areas of effect if they do. I played it for hours on end it was great. EDIT: Oh, Scott played it on his channel a year ago.
Things have improved since the late 70's when a made-for-TV movie showed a comet coming down on Phoenix, AZ, for several days. The characters just look up in the sky periodically to see how close it is getting, so it's apparently rotating with the Earth (1000+ MPH), to make sure it doesn't miss the city. Don't recall whether it hits or not.
I think 30 hours of ksp should be mandatory in every middle school. globally. with a teacher that explains how and why this shit works. the project end goal, land a rocket on the moon by the end of the week in a space-race sorta thing. allow the student to walk around and spy on each other for bonus realism.
I feel bad for on site advisors. Lindybeige had a friend who was an advisor on a medieval film. They only asked him one question... "Would the army marching along have this flag in front of them or in the back?", to which the advisor replied, "That's a cavalry standard.". They then walked away from him and never asked him anything again. As for the whole "Oooohhh big spooky rock gonna hit us" thing goes... well, we've been hit with tens of thousands of them. Some were pretty big too, but we're still here. :)
Yeah but then would the chunks be small enough to burn up in the atmosphere or at least not annihilate the entire planet? My knowledge of astrophysics is pretty limited so I'm probably missing something.
TheWindigomonster Even if they would burn up completely, the energy released per square km of the surface would be enough to heat up the atmosphere too temperatures way too high for humans. Scott even has a video on that ("why nuking an asteroid wouldnt save the world").
1. Whatever you knocked it with to spin it would knock a chunk off the asteroid before getting it to spin hard enough to fly apart. 2. Theoretically, you could blow the asteroid apart far enough from the planet that the slightly-different orbits of the chunks were enough to make a significant percentage miss. 3. A 7-km asteroid won't destroy the Earth, it would just cause a mass extinction. I'm not sure some cosmic jerk throwing Mars at Earth would destroy the planet. The asteroid burning up in the atmosphere wouldn't be _as_ bad, but all the thermal energy and dust would still be bad.
This reminds me of the Matrix. In the movie, the Machines want to keep the humans "bottled up" to use as generators, harvesting our body heat (among other things) to generate electricity. I read somewhere that the original idea instead was to use our brains as processors, to run all of the software on. Humans would essentially be hosts to the machines, and every person disconnected would be like one shelf in a server rack going dark. This would make just a tiny bit more sense, assuming that you accept the basic premise that people can be seamlessly connected to computers, but someone decided that the "electricity" version would look cooler on film. I would assume that many of the things wrong in shows like his come about for the same reason: the real thing wouldn't look as cool, or be less comprehensible to someone without a background in spacerocketry.
Great job by the excellent Scott Manley video ... my only nit is that there is a limit to how far a show's producers should "stretch" science for the benefit of fiction, and only so far that we're willing to support that argument. The problem with any show that purports to be science fiction (SF or SciFi) is that it needs to have some credible basis to sustain the viewer's willing suspension of disbelief: the show's writing, production and creative premise have to deliver an enjoyable experience based on buying into its fictional premise in the first place. It's an informal deal between the creators and the viewers; break the terms of that deal and that willing suspension of disbelief bubble pops. There is a difference between a viewer's initial open-mindedness regarding the show's premise and the viewer holding on to the continued belief in that premise. Willing suspension of disbelief boils down to holding off on or postponing judgment regarding the credibility of the fictional story. For Salvation, they should just have called themselves "fantasy" and then used some self-consistent, arbitrary system of magic to explain the effects. IMO fantasy is different from "speculative science fiction." There are some that explain Salvation's script as "bending" the science to fit the necessities of interesting story telling. IMO there is so much completely wrong with known science in the script that the show needs to reclassify itself as pure fantasy. As an example, Scott Manley's video provides some good examples such as the zero-lag command channel and video feedback. IMO the departure from science in the show is an indication of laziness or carelessness rather than "necessity." That tendency reflects itself in other aspects of the story line, as well, leaving some gaping holes. The Salvation first season started with abysmal ratings and then got even worse. I'd like to think that the audience being smart enough to scoff at the show's science contributed to the ratings, but I am open to someone calling me on that just being more fantasy ...
Hold up, they haven't even gotten to cold fusion yet. Such a shame they don't have a nuclear explosion powered rocket. It's the only semi-viable way to lift a 100,000 ton, city sized mass to orbit!
They just need to throw the Earth at the asteroid. That should divert the asteroid's trajectory enough so that it won't hit the Earth. Now I'm getting horrible Mass Effect 3 flashbacks.
Well the first episode of Star Trek Discovery was pretty bad, they couldn't see it with there sensors but they could see it with there eyes. How does that work? Because they should have optical sensors just so you can get more data, then they go out of communication because the field is stopping them communicating even though the suit has lights on it and if you can see the lights you can send a message with quite high bandwidth certainly enough for audio communication. As long as you can track her that is and they could track her well enough to see that she was free floating... So fucking stupid.
It was the dumbest thing ever. They had to suddenly wrap up the season because the show was getting canned, but even still, this result meant that absolutely everything in the show from day one was totally pointless.
How this should've played out: "Sir! There's a giant asteroid on a collision course with Earth! 7km wide!" "Good god! How long do we have?" "29 years, 8 months and 15 days sir." "Good! Notify the Russians. We'll want them in on this."
this could be such a cool show aswell. needing overcome the political clusterfuck that is today to try and solve an issue which is definitely coming but won't affect most of the people involved. good climate change parallels aswell
One little thing I noted was that the change in density shouldn't affect the gravity tractor's effectiveness at all. At least, according to the law of gravitation F = G m1 m2 / r^2, the force the tractor exerts on the asteroid (and vice versa) would increase linearly with mass, which causes an equal acceleration via F = ma. So the mass of the asteroid is irrelevant, only the mass of the tractor itself matters.
Frankly, I stopped having any good expectations of any science fiction movie or series produce by the major networks since about 2003. This was when The Sci Fi channel changed it's name to Syfy to accommodate a young audience that couldn't spell or at least realize that scifi was a long standing abbreviation for science fiction. Since then most of what has come out of T.V. in the way of science fiction is full of technical holes that even the average high school graduate knows is ridiculous. Except for a few recent movies (and yes, even those have some technical holes), the last good scifi T.V. was Farscape and Firefly and one (only) season of LEXX. None of these productions pandered to the junior high school audience like NBC and Syfy (same company by-the-way) and now CBS have done for the last 15 or so years. Look at "Deep Impact" a Paramount Productions film, and one of the least researched films of all time with a plot centering on a couple of basically clueless 19 year olds. They couldn't even get U.S. geography right in this movie much less astrophysics. Frankly ... I'd rather spend my time playing Kerbal Space and bug laden, memory leaking, Empyrion, and watch naive '50's and '60's scifi movies.
I've seen the trailer and it doesn't look too bad, but you know how trailers can be misleading. I'll have to take your word for it. I do like that the write up about it says the story centers around a detective in an investigation into a major government cover-up. This usually takes the emphases off fantastical technology and more onto the human aspect of the story line. It seems to be produced by Syfy so that makes me skeptical of it. If Syfi isn't producing it and just bought the syndication rights then it may have a decent chance of being worthwhile. I don't even own a T.V. anymore so I'll have to wait for it to show up on Netflix or Hulu or something. Thanks for the heads up.
Pretty much all sci-fi distorts the laws of physics in order to facilitate a good story. The general rule is... the more entertaining it is, the more they bend the laws of physics.
I found the novel _The_ _Moon_ _is_ _a_ _Harsh_ _Mistress_ , which barely bends scientific laws at all, to be _much_ more entertaining. Accuracy and enjoyment are not mutually exclusive.
But I would like to see a movie or show where they exploit the narrative and dramatic potential of the realities of space travel and physics. Rather than bend rules of reality for the sake of entertainment, figure out what could be entertaining about the real stuff. There really is a lot of potential there, although more for something of a particular (specifically, darker) tone.
*Gahaha I think nobody must have noticed what Scott intended with **0:40* He was doing the same thing as the convoluted plot for this episode did. "This is probably too boring for normal people so let's give them an information overload" Scott basically simulated this using subtitles for a secondary story as he narrated the primary story. True genius on his part.. however based on the comments I've read I don't think anyone caught it.
I just finished the show which i loved and I'm starting to read reviews and I'm shocked at how people are so critical. I'm surprised people think a TV show is a college class. It's just entertainment. A lot of humor less people in this world.
Thanks Scott, I thought there was a good chance that I'd find the technobabble in the show too annoying. You saved me the trouble of confirming that for myself
Having been on one of those CGI teams, i can tell you that the *script* likely called for Jupiter in the shot, and if they made a 'realistic' shot of it they are going to spend a bunch of time redoing it.
Mr. President! We've detected a seven kilometer asteroid headed straight for us! GET THE ROCKET SCIENTIST! Oh, that thing'll tear itself apart, it's no problem bro.
Hi Scott, love your work. Thanks for the review on this. I saw some screenshots and got intrigued. But, I normally start throwing stuff at the TV when writers show they either didn't bother with a consultant or ignored them. So, I suspect I will save myself some grief thanks to this video. Oh btw, there is an alien invading your right nostril, maybe a little post editing can handle it. Good Luck.
![ประสบการณ์ จ้าง Developer ที่ผมจะไม่มีวันลืม [ภาค2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pZbsSDRrmXA/mqdefault.jpg)
Some Writers are just like "let's use big words so we sound more photosynthesis".
lol.
How DARE you titrate my capacitance!!
Lets retrograde so we seem entropy.
We need a gravity tractor to pull us out of earth's gravity well, then we will catch a gravitational wave all the way to Mars.
And when you are Greek and all the "big words" are just made of simple small greek words combined, like light and composition which is photosynthesis xD
I'm fine with sci-fi being completely unrealistic. I mean, like many, I loved Stargate!
What I really dislike though is when sci-fi pretends to be realistic while being blatantly incorrect about physics.
Because that's not only dishonest, it is how you get the worst misconceptions into the minds of the general public. That just makes me mad.
Bingo. Just be honest, and I'll be more than happy to suspend disbelief, if you're telling a good story.
I get what you mean and agree. we should kinda differentiate between genres more precisely though. A lot of stuff that is sold as Sci-Fi is actually Science Fantasy or Utopic Action/Horror or simply Drama set in a more or less distant future
It's not really super realistic, the asteroid is just Aliens anyway.
Ever talked to non-KSP people about space? One guy told me that spaceships have spinning centrifuge things to create artificial gravity to keep them from falling back down to earth. That's not even a movie misconception, some people just won't understand things whether you present it accurately or not.
A realistic plot wouldn't have worked because "an asteroid will kill earth in 10 years" doesn't sound terrifying.
You would probably not even get a call with the President for that.
The asteroid is going to slingshot around the sun and hit earth on its return. Season 3.
Gitami
but he CAME BACK
Yeah because they can calculate if a Jupiter flyby asteroid gonna collide with Earth but they couldn't figure out which way it's gonna go after they deflect it.
Gitami No it’s going to go back in time and then land on earth and ask to see the nuclear wessels...
Don't tell the writers, they probably haven't figured out that that's where they're going yet
It's going to go back in time, hit earth and wipe out the dinosaurs. CALLED IT!
The only way I can think to make a killer asteroid movie (or show) be interesting again would be if it was set in the 1960's. Then there would be a good explanation as to why we have a low velocity impact we didn't see until it was almost too late, the tension of the US and the USSR being forced to work together would give plenty of intrigue, and of course this would be an excellent excuse to have famous astronauts like Neil Armstrong and Yuri Gagarin be stars in a modern movie.
Hollywood really needs people like you, all they do these days is to just follow the same old formulas and clichês, absolutely no innovation
actually I'd watch the hell out of that. Gargarin and Armstrong in the same space capsule? fricking YES PLEASE
Sawyer AWR HELL YES
@Sawyer AWR If the Soviets would ever let him fly again, or if he'd even fly. He watched his friend burn up in space because of their incompetence.
it depends when the series is set, if the series is set before korolev died then it would go very well, soviet spacecraft only started to explode and fail when mishin started to lead the space program
And you thought they ran out of plot twists, as the asteroid stops and hovers lmao
cos it isnt an asteroid..
it's a hummingbird
@@sat2173 hilarious :D
yup, that made the movie sucks.
@@yogid21 it’s not a movie ....
Nothing will ever beat "2012" for its inaccuracies, the main one being the very first line..."the neutrinos are mutating" (Thanks to Ferrari 312T4 for pointing out my mistake)
The Core comes pretty close.
Joseph Shortall
What about Nass Effect Andromedon's "acceleration increasing" warning whilst in free fall?
That's a good one, but is it the very first line?
Joseph Shortall
Ah, no, but it happens within the first 20 minutes
due to lack of interest, tomorow is canceled
The Kraken made the EM drive explode. It does for me.
"sorry jeb, you aint going to space this week" -the kraken
Haha. It triggered all kind of weird effects when I teleported my transport ant to mun to test if it could move my connection rubes and connect it to the base modules. What a horrible creative painful way to build a modular station.
yeah lol
Scrolling text transcribed:
"Like the character that was killed by Polonium poisoning, which will kill you but was mainly used because it is super secret and hard for an autopsy to spot unless they knew to look for radiation, So why would a government sponsored assassin kill someone in Russia with polonium when they could just off them by a more conventional method and then trust the local coroner to do whatever their bosses told them to.
"And then you have the Chelyabinsk being used as a weapon to destroy some secret Russian/Chinese project that must have been hidden in a lake because that's where the biggest chunk of Chelyabinsk ended up.
"Then there's the Uranium stealing sequence where they relocate the WIPP from New Mexico to Maryland because they didn't bother to look up Wikipedia."
A bit scary to read that a city was used as a weapon and ended up in a lake
Thanks mate !
But then, they poisoned Navalny.
They should have just simply reversed the polarity of the neutron flow.
Rob WE’RE HACKING THE GOVERNMENTS MAINFRAMES, BREAKING THE FIREWALLS
No no no! It would be far easier to just refract the light into a wormhole in order to break spacetime.
Was that a quote of STD or stupid Ghostbusters?
Actually this was in both!
Maybe thats the reason why i call both not scifi but fantasy!
Nah, just redefine the gravitational constant.
@@MonkeyJedi99 by kicking the warp drive core repeatedly
That scrolling text at the bottom of the screen is very hard to read because you're trying to listen what Scott is saying at the same time. Not so good of a decision in my opinion.
I started to listen to scott, then I just wanted to quickly read the text while it was on screen and ended up missing the voiceover.
Yeah, and it went so slowly reading it was painful. I'd much rather have it put in the description or properly presented in the video.
Agreed, not the best choice. Would be better broken out as a segment at the end to music or something if time was too short or it was too much trouble to narrate is on its own.
TH-cam has a magic "Pause" button. Use it.
+Enceos The fields of editing and graphic design have many ways of presenting information so that the viewer can absorb it like a normal person without having to split attention or replay the video or whatever. Scott should have used his mighty brain for figuring that out.
It's not like he couldn't have just shot an additional talking head scene with the information in, if it's that important.
Maybe the numbers during the launch are real, the rocket is just so big for the 100,000t gravity tractor
DatAlien that is one absolutely CHUNKY rocket
You can't Scott the Manley!
You cant out-man the Scott!
I can out-hair him though : p
uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh what
The big plot twist will be after they exhausted all options and prepare to die. The asteroid will slow down, land and aliens will come out.
JJayzX SALVATION SEASON 200- ALIENS ATTACK BECAUSE WE CREATED ANIME
I got nothing.
Uhm you just predicted the outcome of the last episode. Are you a wizard?
I remember saying half way through the first season that the asteroid wasn't an asteroid. What wasn't clear is whether it was a figment (not really there) or something else. They answered that pretty conclusively in season finale this year. On the other hand, it's still not clear exactly what it is. Probably a space craft of some kind, but beyond that, it's not clear.
How did you know?
a choice between the asteroid hitting the earth and killing everything ( a very terminal end of series) , and a hail-mary alien spaceship twist leaving room for further series - I've got a better one though: The smart kid teleports the asteroid into the Game of Thrones universe just before episode 3 of the last series - 'Oh no the army of the dead has broken into Winterfell!! what shall we do? Whats that roaring sound?' KABOOM
Couldn't stand Salvation. Terrible science, and worse than that, terrible characters.
"Oh no, we're all going to die in 6 months" kind of lacks punch when your first thought is "oh, good".
Yup it's like "We are all gonna die in 6 months unless we as nations all work together"..they think about it for 5 mins then....."Nah, lets just speed up our extinction with a nuclear war first."
Or the "We can't give up our humanity and torture people or kill folks even if it helps us save ALL humanity."
Good job. You're very special. Go back to your momma's basement now...
Wasn't an asteroid 😊😩
Me too, this show sucks.
That’s exactly how I felt at the end of season one of The Walking Dead.
Me, watching scifi as a child: "Wow, science is so cool! I'm going to be a scientist when I grow up!"
Me, watching scifi 20 years later: "I hate this garbage. Rockets don't work like that. Hey, that space guy uploaded on youtube."
Do what I did years (no, decades) ago: Throw over entirely ANY idea of learning real science FROM sci-fi. That is NOT what it is good for.
What Sci-fi does best, is to ASSUME some "science" or future state, and then explore what happens to "normal" people and situations if you carry such an assumption through in the story (no confusion here: it's just a STORY).
But as to "rockets don't work that way," why stress? That's not what the story is about, it's just a bright crayon to add color.
I would love to see more videos of you pointing out the science flaws in TV / Movies.
I would prefer to see Scott pointing to some sci-fi shows which have less flaws !
Totally! Dissecting a bad movie with science is hilarious.
It's not hard lol.
And we can comment pointing out flaws in him pointing out flaws
OR, you could do what I think any responsible person would do, if faced with the same gap between story and reality: Get some Science Education (it's fascinating AND informative, dude!), so that YOU will know the difference.
I almost always know what's bunk on first viewing, which is a MUCH better tack to take, because it doesn't let the LIES circulate through my tender thinking apparatus in the meantime (the longer and less internally monitored LIES are, the greater effects they WILL have in there: better to kill them off in the cradle, so you can continue to RELY on their truth-content).
And my achievement (preserving what remains of my part of WISDOM is definitely an achievement) is due because I paid attention in my science classes, and have never stopped READING.
I literally lol'ed at 12:48 when the dust rolls around the asteroid like it's flying through air or something.
No that's just the big asteroid accelerating towards the direction of the impact, as the little one that hit it had negative mass!
Am I the only one who really enjoys the show and hopes for a new season?
I enjoy it also,it's a show, entertainment purposes,not to get likes in you tube.😂😂😂😂
Now I want to write a book or a movie that follows a similar premise - someone finds something weird in the data, announces that an asteroid is going to hit the earth and wipe out all life, and give a short time frame - 180 days or so. Focus on everyone freaking out, the human element, people killing themselves and their families, or collapsing into despondency, all of these frantic things happening... and then the asteroid misses the Earth, because the guy was just wrong. And the moral is about responsible reporting and considering that hysterical reporting often does more harm than good, because now they have to clean up after the hysteria.
180 days is plenty enough for better observations and tabloids have predicted our asteroid related doom in past without any collapse.
To be honest, you could just write about the people who actually did kill themselves over conspiracy nonsense involving the large hadron collider, or 2012, or any of the other shit.
@@DatAlien To be fair it's been 20 damn years since the wakefield study, it's been discredited over and over again, and yet people are still losing their shit over it. With the general distrust of authority we have these days I'm sure there'd still be plenty of apocalypse culting.
@@DatAlien That's part of the plot to not get it right in 180 days... where would be the fun?! =)
you could even let the truth come out about 20% into the book but no-one takes it seriously because the sensationalist media ignores it and everyone thinks its the government trying to calm the situation.
I remember giving up on Salvation in the first episode. As someone trying to become an actual Aerospace Engineer, the repeated instance of hearing people talk about stuff they obviously don't understand drove me off before the intrigue was supposed to even start.
It's the exact same thing in car and tech movies.
Just move the plot and don't talk tech.
I love the one where they're pulling data from the dude's hard drive and the agent hands the other one the power supply.
Mike Fortune If this is a sarcasm, very good. If not though..
@Mike Fortune he ain't no film expert and he ain't tryna be. He's trying to be an aerospace engineer so he probably doesn't care about plot as much as you do. People like you don't understand the topics they're talking about, and there is nothing wrong with that. Just don't be a dickhead on the internet
@@glenwaldrop8166 absolutely they are teying to put all math and science just for a show? Its for entertainment purpose not for education in schools. Damn just watch the show like you watch iron man.
@@9999905422 It takes about two seconds to identify a hard drive vs a power supply. It's about the same as calling a woman a man or a dog a tree. It's lazy writing.
As for Iron Man, early on in the MCU, Iron Man tech was flirting with what we're actually capable of *if* we had some kind of absolutely insane power source so *I am* watching it just like I do Iron Man.
Some of this is solvable! Just assume the altitude during the launch sequence is entirely accurate and they built a 20 km tall rocket, then figure out if the mass of said rocket is enough for the gravity tractor. :D
clearly they just need to move the moon so that the asteroid hits it and explodes
Seveneves you mean
Yeah, and they do it by remotely turning on the brakes on lunar rovers that Apollo left behind :D
Sure, and the collision knocks the moon out of it's orbit and it collides with Earth, which then diverts from it's orbit and collides with Venus, which is knocked out of it's orbit and collides with Mercury, and you get a domino effect that wipes out the entire solar system. Think man, THINK!!
@@gergc4871 Sevenenes is a fucking amazing book, one of my favourites. They didn't move the moon though, they just hid in cleft.
It would be as simple as turning the Moon-holograph projector... but we know that holograms don't have mass so can't effect asteroids...unless the asteroid was just a holographic projection...so the hero just needs to locate and turn off the asteroid holograph projector
but then the holographic asteroid was never a threat in the first place.
Well, thank the Flying Spaghetti Monster! We don't need a space program to protect ourselves from holographic asteroids. And the dinosaurs are a hoax along with the Chicxulub impactor.
Goddammit my subtitle-accustomed mind keeps trying to read the scrolling text while you talk.
Now I understand what was happening to me.
lol I actually replayed the video to read.
Wouldn't hobby astronomers find a 7 km object close to Jupiter? Considering that Jupiter is a likely target of observation and Hobby astronomers find asteroids all the time? Especially considering the high Albedo shown in these clips o.O
Turidus and then taken subsequent measurements, figuring out not only that it would exactly hit earth, but what continent it would hit?
No.
The vast, vast majority of telescopes amateur astronomers use (bearing in mind, most won't even go as far as 12-inch diameter, and diameter is what determines light-gathering power - bigger diameter = more light = seeing dimmer objects. Don't even begin to consider magnification - even the four Gallilean moons in a 12 inch telescope with an 8 mm eyepiece and Barlow lens appear as *point sources*) can't even see Amalthea, the 5th biggest moon of Jupiter (250 km x 146 km x 128 km), and the last satellite discovered by visual observation (by one Edward Emerson Barnard, who was working at the Lick Observatory at the time, with a 36-inch telescope).
Funny enough, there *is* a 7 km diameter moon of Jupiter - Praxidike, discovered by a team of astronomers from the University of Hawai'i headed by Scott S. Sheppard in 2000, using the University of Hawai'i 88-inch telescope at the Mauna Kea Observatories.
Source: I'm a member of the Barnard Astronomical Society and regularly use a 12-inch telescope, often looking at Jupiter while it's up because it's one of the more spectacular targets to show people. That and Wikipedia for most of the actual data.
HELL no.
A 7km asteroid next to jupiter is less bright than the planet by a factor of more than two trillion.
That's like seeing one cigarette ember against the backdrop of an exploding Hiroshima-size nuke.
.
A telescope in Hubble's class, with weeks of observations, *might* see it.
.
Hint: you don't want to look right next to a bright object, while searching a very faint one!
They used a hobby astronomer in Armageddon.
Yes but in Armageddon the asteroid is 1) significantly larger and 2) significantly closer.
12:17 Well, as you said, the rocket travelled 10 km in 3 seconds. And when you look at the image, that seems to be less than the length of the rocket. So I estimate that the rocket is at least 20-30 km long. So I don't have a big problem with it having to weigh 100.000 tons.
Seems legit.
@@kukuc96 thats simple, you build it laying down. then tie a rope around the top to pull it upright.
Márton Ovád everybody knows aerospace engineers are actually just disguised magicians
Nice joke but still, it also said about 200-300kmh.
Salvation is my current favorite TV comedy. It narrowly beats out Scorpion for best unintentional comedy.
I'm not into cringe, sadly.
my mom recomended that dumpsterfire to me as "a show about autistic nerds" yes but those are hopefully not the intended audience. couse DaMMM
Salvation will end up with 9 seasons and a TV movie, meanwhile The Expanse will probably get canned at season 3. (please let me be totally wrong)
ComandanteJ you can't be wrong with the scifi dynasty bro
ComandanteJ then the Expanse gets picked up by the richest man in America whose business got started selling books. But the president of the USA is raging against him on Twitter. This plot is more unrealistic than a TV show.
salvation didn't even finish season 2 properly. pretty wrong on that end at least.
ComandanteJ look at TWD, 9 seasons and a movie coming soon
Funny how you got it twisted xd
To quote the animaniacs: "There's a plothole in this so large you could drive a truck through it."
LT Gen Klink. Well, there are so many plotholes that you can run a highway through them and not hit a single thing.
Space is black. Plot holes are black. You can fit a really big plothole in space and nobody would know. It is hard to fathom just how big of a plothole can fit in sppace.
There's a plothole in this so large you could fit a black hole in it!
Or there's a plothole in this so large you could fit a 7 km asteroid in it.
The plot hole is so large that the universe could fit inside it.
probably they haven't checked the staging on the EmDrive
I blame a resonant cascade. That's the most likely way to get an explosion out of a resonant cavity.
>Sets my microwave to power 11/10
>Microwave conflagrates
Thanks for the warning, I'll cross it off my list of things to watch, which seems to be getting shorter every day.
Does that mean that you are watching a lot of shows?
It means he's a fool.
I was just recommended this after bingewatching The Expanse stuff. I'm so glad we got a series with so much more attention to actual physics - obviously it's not 100% realistic either, but there are so many amazing details in there that actually make sense. Down to little things like a little background graphic of an interplanetary railgun's aim accounting for the gravity of the sun.
The clip of the EM drive exploding,. I can't stop laughing
It didn't even LOOK like an EM Drive... it had a rocket nozzle for crying out loud! The EM drive is a CLOSED SYSTEM, it HAS NO NOZZLE! Also, the nozzle is cone shaped, not bell shaped.
wait... isnt a cone shaped nozzle exactly how the em drive was supposed to work...? to bounce microwave waves off the copper at an outwards angle to generate thrust?
I don't think the EM drive explosion is all that far-fetched. If you dump enough electrical energy into a piece of copper, it can become very explodey and flamey.
The idea of an EM drive actually *working* is, of course. complete fantasy.
designed and built by MichaelBay.Aerospace.Industries
The Kraken payed a visit.
I love the snark ticker. Not sure why everybody else had trouble reading and listening at the same time.
Did anyone else ignore Scott's narration for a while while reading the scrolling text, then cycle back to hear what he was talking about?
I tried to read and listen, sadly i have ADD (no not commercials/adds).
Its hard to watch a movie, read the translation and listen to the actors!
As i gave this Mel Gibson Jesus movie to my mother, very religious, she didnt like it.
She said "its bad, i cant watch it and read, on or the other but not both, why didnt they make a translation like in every other movie?"
Well original language was aramaic, dont think that anyone today speaks that perfectly!
@10:05, can someone calculate the extreme acceleration of that probe based on the decrease of apparent size of Jupiter from that mounted camera? That just looks so ridiculous. Amazing video Scott, and I will definitely...
...fly safe.
Doesn't have to be extreme acceleration, just extreme speed. But yeah that looks fast enough to at least require some redshift/blueshift.
WoaH! Good point.
That thing is going from apparently stationary, to WELL OVER lightspeed, in under a second.
(its leaving Jupiter at a rate of about many jupiter radii per second)
HAHA i thought the same when the probe was leaving earth... like, it turns on an emdrive, a supposedly low thrust system, and its already going faster than the speed of light
This is what passes as "sci-fi" these days...
No, this is mainstream drama with Sci-Fi elements.
True, but it would be nice to have the sci-fi elements make sense. I suppose it doesn't always fit the narrative though.
These days? There's always been stupid sci-fi. If anything scientific accuracy in TV and film is becoming more common.
GiRayne I suppose I was a bit harsh. But that's only my meagre opinion.
It's not really sci-fi if it has that many mistakes. It's just fi ;)
The plot twist gave it so much sense
Omg Scott you're gonna get so owned when you watch the next seasons
Go easy on the CGI team. Many people who work in this area (like myself) are serious science nerds, dot product vector maths used in light path rendering being an example of what I mean. Chances are, someone in the CGI team would have politely pointed out that Jupiter was nowhere near the asteroid but the producers/art directors would have told them to shut up and deliver what they were paid to do. The fact that a respected science bod was consulted, and obviously ignored/overriden in many cases and what I know of the typical production process leads me to believe this. However, this is one of the less egregious examples of ignoring reality, given that people don’t want to see a screen with tiny distant dots on a black field in their TV shows. A similar argument could be made for the exploding EM ‘drive’. A big explosion is much more ‘cinematic’ than a simple burnout. The falsity in the orbital graphics and launch display of 10km in 3 seconds are another story - there is no argument that falsifying reality improves the story in these cases. And that’s the 2D compositing team, a different lot to the CGI people. Even so, there’s probably some story of a demo that was liked by the producers who didn’t want to bother creating an accurate final so a dodgy demo was overlaid on the screens and ended up in the release. The producers are responsible for everything wrong here - the poor saps who do the actual work typically do as they are told, being subcontractors and freelancers. The traditional, so called creative types typically wear their science ignorance on their sleeves, although this is getting better than it used to be 20 or more years ago.
13:00 you kinda miss anouther sin; the material would change nothing but its volume given the gravitional model was used to find its Mass...
Also how the hell is all this being tracked? Is this an AU where Space Stituational Awareness and astroid warning is taken seriously?
Plus predicting anythings velocity to within an error on the magnitude of 0.42m/s over six months, especially when you have limited observations prior to that plus it's in deep space plus on a hyperbolic trajectory... I won't bore people with details about orbit determination but if it's accurate to within a m/s over six months for an object out at jupiter on a hyperbolic trajectory just imagine how accurately you could model satellite orbits over short term periods.
Saimons ...
To be fair position, speed and acceleration of very distant spacecraft are being determined down to the 5th or 6th decimal place in m/s. The Pioneer anomaly was detected when the spacecraft was about 100 metres off of its predicted trajectory all while being 30+ AU away from us. Things like determining the density of Europa and Enceladus were done by carefully tracking acceleration of spacecraft that were 5 and 10 AU out from the sun.
Of course, on the other-other hand, these were measurements taken of highly instrumented spacecraft that were broadcasting on known radio frequencies. Asteroids are lumpy, bumpy chunks of stuff whose composition isn't precisely known so measurement error bars are going to be much larger than for spacecraft we built ourselves.
I was looking EXACTLY for something like that when I finished watching. A reputable space guy that really knows alot talking about a series about space that gets so much weird
It was made of iron in the end? Why didn't they just use a giant magnet?
...Ignore the many obvious problem both simple and complicated to have, here's a question: Supposed you planted a magnet near a skyscrapper made out of iron, which would be more likely to move: the skyscrapper toward you, or the magnet toward the tower?
Edit: also, sarcasm detected.
minh khang tran it would work similar to gravity in this case. Both toward each other, with lighter object moving faster. Just slap rockets on the magnets man!
You still have to make a magnet strong enough to worth the effort (TL;DR, but the tech would have been ridiculously revolutinary), not to mention the magnet itself don't interfere with both the electronic on board, and the frikkin orbital path of the satelite in the first place, lest the mag-telite attract itself and crash into the asteroid.
Well, I meant it as a joke, but I like where you guys are taking this
If I recall, Liam (the MIT student) actually thought about magnets in the last episode of the season. He said something to his girlfriend about magnets, then said "I need to tell Darius (genius CEO guy) about this."
This is a great serie with so many emotions involved. I can wait for next 3rd season. Best movies of all times
Hey you forgot one big thing, """"it's not an asteroid""".......
As a film grad I can tell you that sci-fi is about Moral Dilemmas. That's the narrative drive of sci-fi shows. That's why it's called Science *Fiction* Its not meant to be a lecture but a backdrop to study human moral behaviour. That's it. The characters explored in the show present different moral values. That's the point. For all I care, the asteroid could have been a block of cheese I don't care. It's people like this who are ruining shows chances.
Another idea:
Since the earth represents a moving target, in the best case you "just have to delay" the asteroid. Earth moves with ~30km/s, the earths diameter equals 12000km, so if you manage to delay the arrival by 400 seconds, the asteroid will miss earth. When the asteroid reaches the "impact point" earth simply will no longer be there. Of course this would also work in the other direction. Instead of "braking" the asteroid, speed it up such that earth will not yet have reached the impact position, when the asteroid passes. Thus by choosing either acceleration or deceleration you would have to manipulate the asteroids traveling time "only" by a maximum of 200 seconds.
+kallewirsch2263 and if you do the math it turns out that you need 0.42m/s to do that. Spooky eh?
Ah, this is where this number came from in the video! It was not clear to me how you came up with it. I thought it to be some sideways acceleration to bend the path.
Thanks for clearification.
(and you are right. I have not done the math. mea culpa)
I think what Scott is saying is that the extra velocity you need to apply to the asteroid can be in any arbitrary direction, including forward, backward or sideways. Distance = speed x time, and the objective here is to cause a certain change in distance of the impact point in any direction, within a given timeframe.
th-cam.com/video/0GoPRCjEhTc/w-d-xo.html
Watched the show, and I loved it🙂❤!!
So, long story short: plotholes big enough to throw that 7 km asteroid into without scraping the edges, saving Earth in the process 😁… and I had never heard of this series before having Scott's video pop up in my subscriptions… Thanks, Scott - this'll be at least something to laugh at, when it crops up 'round these parts 😀👍
So you're Scott Manley until next year... What name will you assert next year ?
0:29 "Expect spoilers" :) I never was so happy to get spoilers! :)
That recent comet from interstellar space a few weeks ago, I find it super cool. (I mean it probably is with the ice and all), but if there are lots of these events around the galaxy, it suddenly becomes a massive game of interstellar pinball with thousands, maybe millions of tiny rocks trying to get to the center of the galaxy as fast as possible.
It’ll turn out to be Fear the Skies, and Samson’s actually a whole bunch of littler objects, each carrying a powerful alien android as a prelude to a major invasion force!
I guess then they probably should have nuked it.
Nuking it is an idea that would work though so we cannot have that in our super dramatic sci-fi show
Based on measurements attained through precise instrumentation at the 11:54 mark of this video ("my fingers pressed against my monitor"), I've determined that the rocket is almost exactly 9 kilometers long. _Edit: I failed to take into account that the altimeter is probably in the nose, whoops. 9km seems the correct, corrected length._
Don't worry about the spoilers, way too holey for me.
i work in film and these sorts of issues indicate a half-arsed production team. the existence of a video like this indicates a horribly sloppy screw-up of a production and massive financial mismanagement. the whole point of film is 'suspension of disbelief' - 100% fail. Great video as always Mr Manley, appreciate the time you took to straighten this idiotic mess.
So just how many rocket engines placed on opposite sides of earth would we need to spin the planet up until it flew apart?
Far, far more than all of them. Increasing the rotation rate of the planet to once every 84 minutes would put everything on the surface of the planet into orbit.
This reminds me of a game called INTERPLANETARY. It's pretty fun. I don't actually own it but I remember playing it on a free weekend or something a year ago. It's like battleship meets Civilization. It's a turn based space game where your civilization on one planet is at war with civilizations / colonies on other planets and you have to account for the movement of all the planets and large objects when you fire to try to bombard the planets surface and hit their facilities. A late game super weapon was slinging asteroids from the asteroid belt that are hard to predict and slow but have huge areas of effect if they do. I played it for hours on end it was great.
EDIT: Oh, Scott played it on his channel a year ago.
Funny in the end, that it's not an asteroid 😅
Hey Scott I still love the content you put out. Popping on your channel and an episode of Interstellar Quest is a great way to start the day.
It isn’t an asteroid though
When he said: "The size of Texas Mr president," I lost it. too funny.
Plot Twist!
The dinosaur's sent it.
Things have improved since the late 70's when a made-for-TV movie showed a comet coming down on Phoenix, AZ, for several days. The characters just look up in the sky periodically to see how close it is getting, so it's apparently rotating with the Earth (1000+ MPH), to make sure it doesn't miss the city. Don't recall whether it hits or not.
Sounds like a good chunk of this fuckery could have been avoided by forcing the artists and writers play at least 30 hours of kerbal.
I think 30 hours of ksp should be mandatory in every middle school. globally. with a teacher that explains how and why this shit works. the project end goal, land a rocket on the moon by the end of the week in a space-race sorta thing. allow the student to walk around and spy on each other for bonus realism.
@@profwaldone That actually sounds fun maybe down the grade to 3rd grade maybe then you could do it every year with increasing difficulty per grade
I feel bad for on site advisors. Lindybeige had a friend who was an advisor on a medieval film. They only asked him one question... "Would the army marching along have this flag in front of them or in the back?", to which the advisor replied, "That's a cavalry standard.". They then walked away from him and never asked him anything again.
As for the whole "Oooohhh big spooky rock gonna hit us" thing goes... well, we've been hit with tens of thousands of them. Some were pretty big too, but we're still here. :)
So could you knock it in a spot that would make it rotate fast enough to break apart?
Then you would still have all that mass on pretty much the exact same trajectory.
Yeah but then would the chunks be small enough to burn up in the atmosphere or at least not annihilate the entire planet? My knowledge of astrophysics is pretty limited so I'm probably missing something.
And now you have a Asteroid-sized shotgun blast heading for the Earth instead. This is exactly why nuking asteroids is not a solution!
TheWindigomonster Even if they would burn up completely, the energy released per square km of the surface would be enough to heat up the atmosphere too temperatures way too high for humans. Scott even has a video on that ("why nuking an asteroid wouldnt save the world").
1. Whatever you knocked it with to spin it would knock a chunk off the asteroid before getting it to spin hard enough to fly apart.
2. Theoretically, you could blow the asteroid apart far enough from the planet that the slightly-different orbits of the chunks were enough to make a significant percentage miss.
3. A 7-km asteroid won't destroy the Earth, it would just cause a mass extinction. I'm not sure some cosmic jerk throwing Mars at Earth would destroy the planet. The asteroid burning up in the atmosphere wouldn't be _as_ bad, but all the thermal energy and dust would still be bad.
This reminds me of the Matrix. In the movie, the Machines want to keep the humans "bottled up" to use as generators, harvesting our body heat (among other things) to generate electricity.
I read somewhere that the original idea instead was to use our brains as processors, to run all of the software on. Humans would essentially be hosts to the machines, and every person disconnected would be like one shelf in a server rack going dark.
This would make just a tiny bit more sense, assuming that you accept the basic premise that people can be seamlessly connected to computers, but someone decided that the "electricity" version would look cooler on film.
I would assume that many of the things wrong in shows like his come about for the same reason: the real thing wouldn't look as cool, or be less comprehensible to someone without a background in spacerocketry.
To repeat myself from Twitter: Just part of why I gave up on this show before the final two episodes. Had to save myself from fatal facepalming.
Two years late but I'm glad I missed this show, not that I watch TV anyway, my brain is hurting just watching this video.
Your friend wrote nemesis?! I loved that book! I actually read the Hebrew translation
To be clear, there's more than one book called Nemesis.
Scott Manley I remember the book being about a different solar system that is going to crash into our sun... Is that not it?
+uriya Lutzker that’s Arthur C Clarke’s book.
Yah, I got confused for a second there, I read the ACC one..
Memo to self: get Scott to consult when I produce my next sci-fi movie.
This show sounds like a train wreck
Nah. A train wreck uses real physics.
Great job by the excellent Scott Manley video ... my only nit is that there is a limit to how far a show's producers should "stretch" science for the benefit of fiction, and only so far that we're willing to support that argument.
The problem with any show that purports to be science fiction (SF or SciFi) is that it needs to have some credible basis to sustain the viewer's willing suspension of disbelief: the show's writing, production and creative premise have to deliver an enjoyable experience based on buying into its fictional premise in the first place. It's an informal deal between the creators and the viewers; break the terms of that deal and that willing suspension of disbelief bubble pops.
There is a difference between a viewer's initial open-mindedness regarding the show's premise and the viewer holding on to the continued belief in that premise. Willing suspension of disbelief boils down to holding off on or postponing judgment regarding the credibility of the fictional story.
For Salvation, they should just have called themselves "fantasy" and then used some self-consistent, arbitrary system of magic to explain the effects. IMO fantasy is different from "speculative science fiction."
There are some that explain Salvation's script as "bending" the science to fit the necessities of interesting story telling. IMO there is so much completely wrong with known science in the script that the show needs to reclassify itself as pure fantasy. As an example, Scott Manley's video provides some good examples such as the zero-lag command channel and video feedback. IMO the departure from science in the show is an indication of laziness or carelessness rather than "necessity." That tendency reflects itself in other aspects of the story line, as well, leaving some gaping holes.
The Salvation first season started with abysmal ratings and then got even worse. I'd like to think that the audience being smart enough to scoff at the show's science contributed to the ratings, but I am open to someone calling me on that just being more fantasy ...
So how long before they resort to time travel?
Hold up, they haven't even gotten to cold fusion yet.
Such a shame they don't have a nuclear explosion powered rocket. It's the only semi-viable way to lift a 100,000 ton, city sized mass to orbit!
They just need to throw the Earth at the asteroid. That should divert the asteroid's trajectory enough so that it won't hit the Earth. Now I'm getting horrible Mass Effect 3 flashbacks.
I’m not complaining, but the bottom caption looks like this a news channel and I love it
Well the first episode of Star Trek Discovery was pretty bad, they couldn't see it with there sensors but they could see it with there eyes. How does that work? Because they should have optical sensors just so you can get more data, then they go out of communication because the field is stopping them communicating even though the suit has lights on it and if you can see the lights you can send a message with quite high bandwidth certainly enough for audio communication.
As long as you can track her that is and they could track her well enough to see that she was free floating... So fucking stupid.
I haven't watched it; is it possible that what they were seeing was being projected into their minds, and wasn't physically there in the normal sense?
It was brilliant :) Scott, You definitely need another series "Space Cinema Sins"
If you have seen season 2 you would know it's not an astroid
It was the dumbest thing ever. They had to suddenly wrap up the season because the show was getting canned, but even still, this result meant that absolutely everything in the show from day one was totally pointless.
Thank you for talking about this. Even as a seasoned ksp player I wouldn't have noticed most of this.
Hullo
I'm Scott Manley
Scott Manley Fly safe.
Came here for a thargoid... left disappointed
How this should've played out:
"Sir! There's a giant asteroid on a collision course with Earth! 7km wide!"
"Good god! How long do we have?"
"29 years, 8 months and 15 days sir."
"Good! Notify the Russians. We'll want them in on this."
this could be such a cool show aswell. needing overcome the political clusterfuck that is today to try and solve an issue which is definitely coming but won't affect most of the people involved. good climate change parallels aswell
Is like to se a follow up to this, since the asteroid wasn’t intact asteroid but a spaceship
One little thing I noted was that the change in density shouldn't affect the gravity tractor's effectiveness at all. At least, according to the law of gravitation F = G m1 m2 / r^2, the force the tractor exerts on the asteroid (and vice versa) would increase linearly with mass, which causes an equal acceleration via F = ma. So the mass of the asteroid is irrelevant, only the mass of the tractor itself matters.
Well well well it wasnt an asteroid thats 4 sure ;)
Wait, at 4:07 why is Neptune closer than Uranus and why is the gap between (what should be) Uranus and Saturn so small?
Frankly, I stopped having any good expectations of any science fiction movie or series produce by the major networks since about 2003. This was when The Sci Fi channel changed it's name to Syfy to accommodate a young audience that couldn't spell or at least realize that scifi was a long standing abbreviation for science fiction. Since then most of what has come out of T.V. in the way of science fiction is full of technical holes that even the average high school graduate knows is ridiculous. Except for a few recent movies (and yes, even those have some technical holes), the last good scifi T.V. was Farscape and Firefly and one (only) season of LEXX. None of these productions pandered to the junior high school audience like NBC and Syfy (same company by-the-way) and now CBS have done for the last 15 or so years. Look at "Deep Impact" a Paramount Productions film, and one of the least researched films of all time with a plot centering on a couple of basically clueless 19 year olds. They couldn't even get U.S. geography right in this movie much less astrophysics. Frankly ... I'd rather spend my time playing Kerbal Space and bug laden, memory leaking, Empyrion, and watch naive '50's and '60's scifi movies.
The Expanse is a pretty good show. About on par with Firefly in terms of scientific accuracy.
I've seen the trailer and it doesn't look too bad, but you know how trailers can be misleading. I'll have to take your word for it. I do like that the write up about it says the story centers around a detective in an investigation into a major government cover-up. This usually takes the emphases off fantastical technology and more onto the human aspect of the story line. It seems to be produced by Syfy so that makes me skeptical of it. If Syfi isn't producing it and just bought the syndication rights then it may have a decent chance of being worthwhile. I don't even own a T.V. anymore so I'll have to wait for it to show up on Netflix or Hulu or something. Thanks for the heads up.
Firefly is a good show, but it's not very scientifically accurate.
Wait, isn't Deep Impact, like, ancient?
I had to stop you to watch that tv show first. Sounds so funny. Will come back here later.
Damn you Russian hackers!
dah..it IS entertainment..Sorry Scott if they did't consult with you.
Pretty much all sci-fi distorts the laws of physics in order to facilitate a good story. The general rule is... the more entertaining it is, the more they bend the laws of physics.
I found the novel _The_ _Moon_ _is_ _a_ _Harsh_ _Mistress_ , which barely bends scientific laws at all, to be _much_ more entertaining. Accuracy and enjoyment are not mutually exclusive.
Yet the story is terribly bad…
It's not Heinlein's best, I'll give you that--I'm more of an Asimov man anyway--but it proves the point well enough.
But I would like to see a movie or show where they exploit the narrative and dramatic potential of the realities of space travel and physics. Rather than bend rules of reality for the sake of entertainment, figure out what could be entertaining about the real stuff. There really is a lot of potential there, although more for something of a particular (specifically, darker) tone.
so, to travel faster than light we just need to invent a entertainment engine :D
*Gahaha I think nobody must have noticed what Scott intended with **0:40*
He was doing the same thing as the convoluted plot for this episode did.
"This is probably too boring for normal people so let's give them an information overload"
Scott basically simulated this using subtitles for a secondary story as he narrated the primary story.
True genius on his part.. however based on the comments I've read I don't think anyone caught it.
oh well, this video did not age well
I just finished the show which i loved and I'm starting to read reviews and I'm shocked at how people are so critical. I'm surprised people think a TV show is a college class. It's just entertainment. A lot of humor less people in this world.
Thanks Scott, I thought there was a good chance that I'd find the technobabble in the show too annoying. You saved me the trouble of confirming that for myself
Team up with Cinema Sins.
Or even better, team up with somebody who has talent.
Cinema Sins stopped being funny.
Cinema Sins is pretty terrible at spotting real flaws. Maybe the Cinema Sins writers moonlight as Salvation writers too?
Having been on one of those CGI teams, i can tell you that the *script* likely called for Jupiter in the shot, and if they made a 'realistic' shot of it they are going to spend a bunch of time redoing it.
Mr. President! We've detected a seven kilometer asteroid headed straight for us!
GET THE ROCKET SCIENTIST!
Oh, that thing'll tear itself apart, it's no problem bro.
well turns out to be an alien ship
Russian hackers... but of course... fill that as garbage propaganda show that I will never watch. Next!
Hi Scott, love your work. Thanks for the review on this. I saw some screenshots and got intrigued. But, I normally start throwing stuff at the TV when writers show they either didn't bother with a consultant or ignored them. So, I suspect I will save myself some grief thanks to this video. Oh btw, there is an alien invading your right nostril, maybe a little post editing can handle it. Good Luck.