Ocean fish habitats the fish can breed and grow around. The finish of the blades could be made ideal for fast attachment of crustaceans. making degradation no factor. Changing currents to push cooler water towards endangered coral. Iron smelters have giant grinders and CO2 for carbon capture wanting carbon for carbon steel.
Surprised me a bit, granted makes sense since how spread out the waste is per capita (or whatever the right term would be) (Granted in my biased opinion having good Waste-to-Energy infrastructure with materials recovery is worth it regardless!)
Not really because that's two technologies we want more adoption of, so you're making bikes look bad as well. Find something we don't want, like cigarettes or some other stupid product and compare it to that. "You could save a lot more waste by getting rid of this thing that no-one needs..."
@@jonevansauthor I understand what you mean, but the point of this is that both the bike frame and the turbine composite life consumption are a very small amount of material.
It’s not really a good comparison. I have eight bicycles in my household and none of them are made from glassfibre or carbonfibre. 80+% of my electricity comes from wind turbines
I like the idea of converting the blades into rebar. You still get to keep the material advantages of the composite (strong but not brittle, corrosion resistant), while keeping the recycling process simple (cutting the blades into lengthwise strips). You also get around the skate park problem, as rebar is something with a continuous industrial demand.
I also really like that idea. I couldn't find a lot of details about it (no photos yet, it's not mentioned on Regen's website). I only know they're doing that because of a podcast I listened to. I did get in touch with the company to let them know I'd like to know more so hopefully I can feature that solution in more depth in the future.
Rebar is designed like it is for reasons. Strips of scrap turbine blades do not offer the same benefits. It is not just a case of putting long things into the concrete.
@@Dilbert-o5k Why not? You could add new epoxy & fibre bands around the long sections to connect with the concrete, and ditto for tying together different blade sections. This would also solve the corrosion problem that concrete has when water leaks in thru cracks to rust the rebar, expanding it and weakening the whole structure. Maybe the only reason not to is if the sections have different thermal expansion rates.
@@tomtrottier8135 YT disappeared the original reply Why? You need to look into why rebar is used and what qualities are required. Then compare with strips of scrap wind turbine blades and see whether they match up. Rebar isn't just there as filler.
@user-it7lf7kk8m Good points. Steel is great for rebar because of its high tensile strength. I know that carbon composites can replace steel in *some* applications, but I don't know how well it works here. I'd do know that carbon fiber composite is stiffer than steel, though (and that sounds like a problem in this application to me, though I could be wrong).
We don’t recycle blades here in North America, but we do grind them up and send them to concrete companies for the fibrous material to strengthen the concrete.
Is that not re-using ? Its kind of downcycling , but the CO² locked in the composite remains in the new product , the transport of old blades is relatively cheap they can be cut up,or rough crushed on site to suit the trucks, hell if its a large wind farm refurb / renewa,l the finished crushing could be done on site ,with something like a wood chipper,
There is even research into adding carbon to concrete that shows it can even significantly improve the properties of the resulting concrete... Personally, this approach makes the most sense to me at the moment... In 50 years, the situation may be different, but compared to coal and oil, burying non-toxic material is literally a small thing...
Is that waste ok when it starts wearing out of the concrete? The same is proposed for plastics to be ground down and used in new products. But if it is not melted together then as the item weathers you are getting micro plastics leaching out into the environment and therefore is it really eco? Just a question.
How about a video on the lifetime of blades, mechanisms of how/why they wear out or fail, what options are there for making blades last longer so there is less need recycle them, etc...
I think a fair fraction of the blades come up not because of end-of- life but because existing wind farms replace their turbines early. With the scaling of power as blade length increases, you could put two 8 MW units in the space of four 2 MW units. Upgrading an existing site might be better/ easier than opening a new one.
A big problem is that insufficient account was taken for the grinding effect of dust in the wind. Apparently it is grinding down the leading edges of the blades, so the blades are having to be changed earlier than expected.
I considered that. Modern jet engines from GE use carbon fiber fan blades with a metal leading edge, I think it's titanium. Seems like wind turbine blades should do something similar if this is the main reason they need replacement.@@Dilbert-o5k
What dust in the wind? In most places there is very little and even less at sea. If it is really a problem then a thin metal covering of the vulnerable areas ought to stop it.@@Dilbert-o5k
This is done to an extent with Shredded Tires as well. Most plants (at least modern ones in richer countries, re that note on cost will prevent all this short of regulation forcing corporations) already have good Emissions Controls for Sulfur and Particulate Matter so it can handle the Vulcanizing Sulfur and any smoke/dust from the burning. Negligible sulfur in the Wind Turbine Blades, so should be easier! My only criticism (although data needed) is this may not work as the volume of old blades grows, and thus the need is greater. It could still play a part though and hold out until more technologies reach the same Technology Readiness Level
@@ericlotze7724 Seems like there are way more tyres out there than turbine blades. And yeah, my understanding was that shredded rubber tyres added to roads reduced noise pollution. I can't find the exact number but there seem to be 10's of thousand metric tonnes of wind turbine blades made each year right now. Meanwhile the largest tyre manufacturer, Michelin, makes around 1.5 million metric tonnes of tyres each year.
@@KevinLyda Rubberized Asphalt Concrete is *really* cool! @PracticalEngineering has a great video on Asphalt Concrete if you haven’t seen it yet! In theory if done with sustainable biomass and/or maybe even somehow getting a Power-to-X workflow to make hydrocarbons that heavy, it could be a form of Carbon Sequestration in Construction kind of deal.
Two things Rosie, you skipped over why these blades are decommissioned in the first place, too small? Cracks? Secondly, having paid a bloody fortune for trusses and beams, it seems to me that simply cutting them up into pieces 14m long and then ripping the cross sections into useful shapes would allow them to be used in all sorts of buildings. Say for cantilevered overhangs that only need to hold up one elephant?
I love the idea of roof structures being made with used turbine blades. I am sure they're going to be excessively strong even if they're retired from their primary role. I suppose the biggest problem would be manufacturing the brackets to attach them to the other roof components. But if someone had a steady supply of a particular design of turbine, then they could CNC cut a series of brackets that do the job. Perhaps warehouse roofing for the larger blades.
@@BobHannent Or have various designs of roofs for different blade sizes, or just use them for long roof spans (hangars?) and use other materials on top for weather protection.
What about the blade determines that it needs to be replaced? I imagine it wears out at certain stress points. Would it make sense to redesign the blades so they can be repaired? What about aluminum or titanium?
Wind turbine blades are designed to last the same amount of time as the rest of the turbine, in theory everything should wear out at once. And yes there are stress points but a well designed blade would not have any one location significantly more stressed than the rest. They used to use aluminium but there were a lot of fatigue failures. And also the blades would be heavier. I made a video way back in the early days about design lifetime, that talks about all this stuff I think: th-cam.com/video/PfquMx9h98M/w-d-xo.html
@@EngineeringwithRosieSo, the whole tower is a "one hoss shay"? This revelation is going to incense the trolls and fossil shills with them citing "planned obsolescence" as another reason to reject renewables. 🤣 Hey, everything has a design life and replacement makes room for the next generation/iteration that will perform even better! 👍
If you want to find alternative uses for retired blades, ask poorer communities. They will show you things that you regard as, 'out of the box thinking'
Getting a good section to cut like that may be difficult due to the more complex shape of wind turbines (they aren’t just a rectangular prism etc) This is being done to an extent with all that Mechanical Recycling. This was mentioned around 11:16 or so where they are basically chopping it up into FRP Rebar which seems really neat! FRP Rebar (Carbon Fiber Rebar is also a frequently used term) doesn’t rust like Steel Rebar, so can heavily prolong the life of Concrete Structures!
I had a section about that idea but cut it at the last minute as the video was just so long! Maybe I'll release just that section as a short video or something.
@@EngineeringwithRosie Have you considered pairing these videos with longer form content like writing? Perhaps a Medium blog? I'd love to dive deep into some of the stuff you show in the videos along with my weekend morning coffee.
If only 5% could be recovered, well.. what happened with the remaining 95%? Yep, we all know...Don't get me wrong, I do understand that technology innovation is a continuous process, but wind energy is still far far from being considered sustainable or clean. Perhaps, until then, we should stop calling it as such.
Possibly not a popular view in this realm, but I'm far more concerned about the effects of turbines on birds & their flight paths which wasn't addressed at all. I'm also not certain why we actually need wind energy when we have so much sun & solar panels are so easy to install & maintain???
Thank you for the fact based video! It is so very interesting, and - I feel - still promising and hopeful. Lot's of potential and stuff going still on; this is why I love wind!
9:20 You would recover the “Pyrolysis Oil” and some (or all if just doing gasification) “Syngas” Both of these could be fed into refineries that currently only use Fossil Fuels to make the Resins. Also the out of scope effect of these facilities processing Municipal Solid Waste (especially sorted thermosets) and *Sustainable* Biomass. Granted i am a MAJOR nerd on all this, but I wanted to know your opinion on all that. (Granted also as you point out the Fiber would need reprocessed, and energy use issues, also if sourced from Fossil Fuels (as most things currently are) it’s basically a Fossil Fuel Thermal Power Plant with more steps)
@@jamesphillips2285 "Carbon taxes need to go up" Valid point in some cases, but it fails where the same amount of energy is required to live and work, regardless of the cost. When people can't afford food, heat and/or home payments, money to change to greener energy is just not available, and the worries about green energy drop down in the list of concerns. Tax where there are convenient and inexpensive alternatives, but not where it causes undue hardship. When people are forced into hardship while alternative approaches are available, they will rebel, and progress will stop, and possibly regress. Support the people, invest in green infrastructure and subsidize its use. Facilitate good living conditions, and far more people would be glad to make the changes. A happy and helpful populace can be a powerful force for progress.
Undoubtedly could be used a million different ways. Problem may be more to do with how to process and market and transport them to achieve that. Then there's the whole subject of cost (especially profitability).
anybody heard of ....building codes? Buildings with people inside are not high school projects. "This thing fits and looks good. Let's put it in!" Treat them as high school projects and you get squished people when earthquakes do a visit. "Oh well they died for the environment anyway. So still, happy thoughts, : )"
@@pbxn-3rdx-85percent Any company manufacturing things would probably get the proper licenses. And as i stated that company making FRP like rebar is probably doing so, if not already done with that process.
Lots of things decompose and release methane so that's a fair question! But not wind turbine blades. They are inert. They will stay there for many many many years, and in fact when we develop good recycling methods we'll be able to dig them up and recycle them if want.
@@EngineeringwithRosieTechnically, this is effective CCS! 😉 I say this (tongue in cheek) to people who whinge about inert plastics being landfilled. But it's true.... Really interesting uptime podcast you did about blade bonding BTW....
@@jimurrata6785I honestly love the concept of “Reverse Coal Mining” with a PILE of Sustainable Carbon Fiber, Sustainable Bio or P2X Based Plastics, or even “Inerted Carbon Black” type materials. Also “Carbon Glass” of that can be scaled up (I would LOVE a Pyramid of giant blocks of it laminated in PACVD Diamond lol) On the note of “Inerted Carbon Black” I basically am thinking having large piles of Carbon Black has a risk (however small) of something akin to a “Coal Seam Fire”. Adding a Fire Retardant (Probably just a powder like Sodium Bicarbonate, which can be made from Brine in a P2X Manner) prevents this. Also if suspended in a P2X or Sustainable Biomass derived Paraffin Wax, it mag get the interesting property of being moldable, and also potentially sealing things like how Bentonite Clay is used in Landfills. That’s my rambling, and it takes more infrastructure we don’t have yet, but this along with Enhanced Weathering is how we get things back to normal as we/after we get to Zero Ongoing GHG Emissions.
Hey Rosie, I'm currently working on a start-up dealing with this very issue, and I wanted to thank you for a comprehensive exploration of the challenges involved, and for shining more light to this very important problem we've yet to solve - after 30 years of trying. Most of what you said we are already familiar with, but some of the recent developments in thermoplastics were new to us. Thank you for including those. Also appreciate that you proved links to your sources, will definitely be looking into those more. Two things stood out in what you said - or rather didn't say. 1) Shredding is very energy intensive, and I'm a little surprised you didn't mention it. It was sort of mentioned in the studies you looked at, but the numbers seemed a little off. 2) Shredding + burning before adding into concrete is the most common use for recycled glass fiber today in most of Europe. I think the best choices for recycling the existing blades is in finding ways to repurpose the material for uses where the unique properties are useful, but would otherwise be too costly to produce. There are some advanced methods for extracting glass fiber, for example Carbon Rivers in the USA has a method with which they claim they can retain over 90% of the original strength of the fibers. But I think these energy intensive methods should be the last in the chain of recycling, after the material can no longer be applied to a new use. How many blade shaped bridges do we want is a fair question to ask, but that is only one possible use case out of several dozen which would benefit from the material properties. Thank you again, and look forward to hearing more of your thoughts on this, and other challenges 👍
In Sweden, we already do that. Burns it in the high temperature oven. In severe heat pains. With very high temperatures. The ash is mixed into concrete, and that ash is not cheap. You get a very high quality of the concrete. No problem. Recycling.
So its not a problem with the blades per se, it's more that the manufacturing sector isn't required to close the loop on their products life cycle, as is usual for most industries. Thanks for the informative break down.
Closed end industrial life cycles are the exception not the rule. And they most often come about because there's something economically viable to recycle. The composite material of wind turbine blades is not one of those materials.
Surely products that are sold as being the green alternative should have those requirements baked in. Otherwise they are no better than the old products we are being told we must replace
@@tracyrreed The oil companies just cap them and leave them in the buried in the ground. My nephew works in the pipeline industry and I was very surprised to hear from him that most end of life pipelines are not removed. You would assume they would be flushed out, recycled and surrounding soil replaced . Out of sight out of mind!
Because Landfills are cheap and not too environmentally harmful pretty much. As per usual though you laid out a bunch of information and taught me some things, great video as usual!
As I noted on Patreon: From the argument above I can't see as the energy of the economy is decarbonised by for instance wind turbines that using 3 days worth of energy is particularly relevant, or very costly, and should not stand in the way of avoiding landfill, especially since technologies like windturbines are decoupling energy use from GHG emissions. Right now, and ever more so by the time blades being produced now are scrapped, reducing energy use is less and less important as it is decoupled from GHG. The principle of as much circularity is important, and should be upheld.
This might not work because it is made of plastics and might seep into the sea water by slowly flaking off microplastics which then get eaten by the wildlife.
It looks as though a comment I made has been auto killed by Google. It was to the effect that googling recycling basaltic fiber shows that it is a very different proposition to fiber glass and carbon fiber. MDMI have hit 90% of the tensile strength of the virgin basaltic fiber in a material in a reycycled material, which also has excellent properties for marine use, when many turbines will be offshore.
@@davidmartin3947 carbon dioxide comes from oxidizing carbon base materials..... sequestering it eliminates that possibility.... So why are you being obtuse about it?
Honestly, I like the concrete clinker idea. That one seemed practical and immediate. More over it helps deal with the fact that 8% of our CO2 emissions come from concrete (which is something we really can't do without)
Actually they recycling them. And the guy who claimed a massive turbine blade burial is fake. Plus Siemens has developed a system about 1 year ago. Add to this modern blade are having longer life.
People complain about wind turbine blades not being recycled, how about the many old fiberglass boats worldwide going to land fill or sunken in our ocean's. At least turbines pay in energy than cost in consumption like super yachts!
And then there's the airline industry. It's my understanding that aircraft are built the same these days - all composite materials, fibreglass, carbon fibre, resin-impregnated.
16:50 if a lot of these are from a sea area, can they not be used as some kind of sea barrier or wave break? I would think it has the right shape. 1. Carbon fibre isn't toxic I think, though I don't know if its a good idea breaking down in waves and impacts and washing up on shore beach? But I still think it could be used as some kind of underwater wave breaker. 2. Coating it in some other materiel to give it a new purpose. 3. Corals?
seems dismissing repurposing is mainly a lack of imagination, would make excellent roof beams and roof shells, just needs some architects to have a go, partner mentions storm water drainage
We could use shredded turbine blades to help build modular sea-retaining walls, to help combat sea level rise. (No, there won't be enough material to actually do anything useful with it, but the optics of that will completely offset the negative optics of the non-issue this really is.)
The following is from a Danish news media (Dr.dk) it is also mentioned in several technical media in Denmark. The article is 18 months old, so there is a youtuber who has not done her job well enough: Up to 85 percent of a wind turbine is already recycled today, but the used blades in particular have proven to be difficult to recycle. But now the wind turbine manufacturer Vestas has developed a method to break down and recycle the used blades. This is what the industry organization Green Power Denmark writes on its website. The method involves dissolving the epoxy glue that holds the turbine blades together. It is "groundbreaking", according to Mie Elholm Birkbak. She is an innovation specialist at Vestas and has helped develop the new method. - We have found a solution that enables us to break down the wing materials in a way that is so gentle that we don't need to use a lot of energy to do it, and we are in the process of building the necessary value chain to realize the goal of recycling used wing material, she says.
a few questions: what are the criteria for retiring the blades? Only a set time period, or are they inspected? Assuming the loads on the blades do not exceed the elastic limit and only the surface degrades, could they be resurfaced, kind of like tires are retreaded? How about blades made of aluminum, like plane fuselages? would these be a good topic for another video?
those should never be buried. they should be shredded and reused with new glass-fibre in compression applications like house foundations, (better design) sip walls, etc etc. same as every other item if broken disassemble and only send the broken part (bare minimum) to recycle and reuse all the good parts.
Would you be able to do a video about wind turbines performance and operations in extreme cold weather? In Alberta Canada, all the wind turbines were offline for a few days in Janurary 2024 due to extreme cold below -35c. With the transition away from fossil fuels, how do you see wind turbines fitting into the energy profile of areas of the world that experiences high electrical usage at the same time of extreme cold? Thankyou!
Very cold climates are the only places where nuclear power makes economic sense because of these sorts of issues. Where Rosie comes from (Australia) energy demand is far largest in SUMMER (eg air conditioning). As Rosie points out in other posts a mostly solar grid is a no-brainer for that country but more wind makes sense in northern latitudes. But there will be some places even in the chilly north where wind cannot do the job.
Hi Rosie, a topic suggestion: How large would a turbine need to be so the speed of its blades' ends would reach speed of sound? How much power would it generate, made of what materials, sonic boom a problem? Is this the practical limit? It would make a super interesting video.
The speed of sound is about 343 metres per second. If a blade takes 4 seconds to rotate then the tip would be moving at the speed of sound if it covered about 1400 metres. That corresponds to a blade length of about 220 metres.
Im glad you mentioned Vestas since most videos never mention them. Their solution for recycling into virgin materials is working, and the materials needed for the process are easily accesable. They are currently working on scaling it up, and it will take a few years until everything is built and in place and ready for commercial use. I understand why you are a bit hesitant since there are many promises in this industry, and there is not always a delivery on these promises. Which goes for most new tech, especially when they look for investors 😅
Wonder if aircraft dismantlers are helping/leading the way in this field or watching and following what happening due to aircraft not mainly made of metals anymore but being made out of more and more composite materials?
Composites fail without warning. Sure, they look and sound cool. They're high-tech, state of the art. Who doesn't like new high tech cool materials? They'll accuse you of being an old fashioned hard headed old geezer if you don't like new cool high tech materials. Composites are light and strong and fails without or little warning. Remember the Oceangate sub? One minute they were fine and then WHOOMP! Pink mist and powdered bones mixing with sea water in less than a second. And where are the carbon fiber pieces? Spread all over the bottom of the ocean, just sitting there and happy as clams. That is why commercial, transport, military aircraft parts such as wing spars, engine mounts, and fuselage ribs are still made of good ol' metals (aluminum alloys, etc.). Composite parts are okay for single passenger aircraft. If a wing spar breaks only one person dies screaming while plunging to earth at approximately 9.8 m/s squared as recommended by good ol' gravity.
Has anyone tried to "recycle" blades into low-cost etc housing materials, e.g. roof tiles? Most countries are facing a housing shortage awa an affordable housing crisis with many lower-income & younger people struggling to afford a home of their own. It's a complex issue, but I'm sure access to low-cost materials - such as from old wind turbine blades - would help immensely. Curitiba (Brazil) has an extensive recycling program that does support its low-income housing sector in one form or another. As a person that will never own my own home, I would never complain if I could construct a whole space for myself using an old blade or two from a dump site - as long as it was safe to do so.
Drop them on the sea floor to make artificial reefs perhaps? That could be very cheap if you put them near the windfarm itself - and useful for sea life.
If the recent reconsideration of offshore VAWT design pans out, would thermoplastics be strong enough to meet those blade requirements? Maybe with some added support structure?
*Since the 70s, hundreds of millions of tons (!) of glass fiber reinforced plastic have been used for pipes, car body parts, stadium roof, building covering, boat huls etc.* *Wind turbine blades have so far accounted for less than 0.0x% of this!* In Europe, larger pieces of glass fiber reinforced plastic are mostly collected and then used as heating material in cement factories.
One thing I do not understand, when a wind mill arrives at end of life, it is usually that the bades are eroded. A new alternator can be fitted in the nacel or retrofit the old one, why not recoating the existing blade some how to give it back its integrity and remount it on the same windmill. instead of recycling, just rewamp and restart. Maybe there are effects that I do not, I am just an electrical not a mechanical nor a material expert.
The thermoset polymer and fibers have an effective design life at the core as well as the surface.... Plus, optomial blades keep getting bigger, requiring taller masts, new generators, etc. Iteration produces more efficient designs, and the wind farmers are looking to profit. Sometimes (every 20 years?) you may as well upgrade your depreciated inventory for a more modern design
Jimurrata6758 put it well. I’d also add in that given surface wear varies from blade to blade, *and* that there are multiple blade sizes/shapes, short of by hand in some giant hangar, the tooling/process control would be quite difficult. When making new blades (with recycled materials or not) you don’t need to worry about this. Although i am no proper expert either! So no worries on that and *i’d love feedback too lol*
In the very early days of this channel I made a video about design lifetime that answers your question in a fair bit of depth. I think it's called something like do engineers design products to fail (I'm on my phone and can't look it up without losing my place in the comments, it's got a yellow thumbnail with a hand drawn wind turbine on it). But the quick answer is that the blades are designed to have the same lifetime as the rest of the turbine. And it's not erosion that determines a blades life, it's fatigue strength. It is possible to repair an eroded blade and operators will always do it because otherwise they'll have to spend far more replacing blades well before the turbines life is up.
@@EngineeringwithRosie ??? I just linked your video here and it's vanished. 🤔 I made a comment up thread about being auto-moderated but I didn't realize that a link to this very channel wouldn't work.
@@ericlotze7724 There are robots that crawl along the blades, grinding cracks and refurbishing the exposed surface (much like you'd repair gelcoat on a boat hull) But the companies that do this have to get a contract to inspect and repair the whole wind farm. They're not going to visit a specific blade of a specific tower for this stuff without a lot of $$$ Ameliorating this cost across dozens of towers makes a campaign viable for the operators. The wind farm would be money ahead just curtailing the one tower until it came to a contracted inspection of the whole farm.
You are under estimating the impact that used or broken wind mills are going to make. This is a very new technology and it's already filling fields with blades that have no particular use for them. If they do have a useful recycling value, why hasn't someone moved that industry to meet the build up of waste created by these used wind mills. Now I am hearing that recently made blades are only lasting 2 years. Don't these blades cost of a million dollars a blade? If so how are we getting any cost effectiveness from them if $4 million of blades have to be replaced every 2 years? Is that why electricity is going up in price. How great is that for the families who are struggling to get by on Bidenomics?
You are misinformed that blades last only 2 years. And you provide the evidence in your comment, they are expensive (hundreds of thousands each unless they are for huge offshore turbines). They make up around 20% of the cost of the turbine and are designed to last 20-30 years depending on the project. If they had to be replaced 10 times in that period, that would triple the cost of the turbine just from the added blade costs. Not to mention the transport and installation costs which are usually more than the blade itself for a replacement after the wind farm is commissioned. What is your source for the every two years factoid? My source is that I work with wind farms where I know every single blade that gets replaced (it's very rare, you can repair nearly anything on a blade). On a huge wind farm you might see a blade replacement every couple of years (usually far less), out of hundreds of blades on site.
Has anyone thought about chemically decomposing the resins in something like nitric acid or sulfuric acid ? I have used these chemicals in the past to decompose epoxy resins in the past for doing failure analysis of integrated circuits. I used these acids to dissolve the epoxy encapsulation so that the silicon die of failed component can be examined. These processes can be done at fairly low temperatures of 100 - 150C. I would think that glass fiber would hold up pretty well in a strong acid. Not sure about the carbon fiber though.
Is the blade structure suitable for cutting into dimensional lumber for housing or commercial projects? Perhaps even heavier beams with special hardware for special uses?
Dear Rosie, There is a specific problem with the turbine blades. In strong winds, the turbine blades often fail and break while the turbine is running at high speeds. The rotor blades hit the ground in the surrounding area and then shatter into very small pieces, which then disappear into the grass or the soil. This contaminates a very large area under the ruptured wind turbine. This means that the agricultural land on which a wind turbine burst is unusable for livestock farming and food cultivation for an extremely long time. The problem can only be eliminated if the soil is removed to a depth of at least 60 cm and dumped. The costs are very high and the wind turbine owner often has neither financial provisions nor insurance to solve such problems. The farmers who leased the land then suffer the damage. In Germany this problem is getting worse because wind turbine construction began about 20 years ago and the systems are now at the end of their life. They are often switched off because operating and repair costs are no longer covered by the profit because the government subsidies in addition to the sale of electricity have expired after 20 years. Old wind turbines should therefore be dismantled immediately after decommissioning. A common reason why turbine blades often break prematurely is damage to the gearbox and brake. Here in Germany, wind turbines are often located on agricultural land that is still used for agriculture or livestock farming. In my opinion, it is therefore risky to set up wind turbines on agricultural land.
Some new info for you,,, a wind farm in my area was sold to the landholder after it had been in operation for 23yrs. Now the landholder has since sold his farm because he found the costs to maintain the wind farm was larger than the returns it earned. SO THE INSTALLERS RECOVERED THE COSTS TO FIT THE SYSTEM AND A HANDSOME RETURN ON TOP & NO COSTS TO REMEDIATE THE AREA AND PROFIT FROM ITS SALE !! yes thats the game watch it roll out in your area
I am an engineer living in California. As I travel through the state, I pass large wind farms. These farms have turbines of various ages. There are a fair number of turbines which are not operating. This made me curious about the lifetime of wind turbines. Therefore my question is: What is the median lifetime of older turbines and what is the predicted lifetime of the newest turbines. Thank you.
I never quite understood why huge chunks of mostly inert plastic in landfills is in any way worse than the absurd amount of other plastic waste our society creates. Greening up the cement industry seems like a great idea. It's already a disaster. Or as filler in concrete. Virgin materials are just to cheap I think
Thanks - that was very interesting. I found myself with remaining questions though... with all that strength, what deteriorates to require the blades to be replaced? If the wind farm is in an isolated place, why don't we use them until they snap (or whatever) ? Are the blades replaced after a specific period (years/rotations) or when some probing instrument finds they are becoming weak/have been damaged?
It is probably worth mentioning that there's a whole flock of people who specialize in installing, inspecting, & repairing wind turbines, including the blades. In doing so they help get the maximum lifetime out of each turbine and all of the components thereof.
One of the problems critics typically have with renewables is the intermittency. During weeks with low renewable potential, we'll still need some sort of fuel to burn for the coming decades. We are doing this with gas, mostly, but i have been brainstorming about saving up all our organic and inorganic waste for those couple of weeks per year where we still need the capacity as a part of the solution. The synergy of burning the turbine blades during periods of low wind is somewhat poetic, and maybe after 2050 we can do it with carbon capture. In a way, burning with carbon capture is the perfect recycling method.
Given how cheap grid storage promises to become in the future, I doubt that burning turbine blades to generate electricity will ever be viable economically. LFP cells are currently $75/kWh in China, and sodium ion will reportedly be 30% cheaper at large scale, so we are talking about $50/kWh. Saltwater flow batteries promise to be even cheaper than that in the future. With dirty cheap storage in the offing, we can solve the variability of solar and wind. It's also worth pointing out that waste incineration generators currently cost roughly 2.5 times more per MWh than solar and wind energy, so incineration generators in general are currently not economically viable. According to one estimate I saw, waste incineration generators cost US$140 per MWh, compared to about US$60 per MWh for new solar and wind farms.
Hi there, sorry if I missed this in your other videos but do you talk about failure modes for wind energy components and ways to prevent them? What would it take to make blades that last at least 100 years? Does it have anything to do with their control algorithms as well?
Great video. Thank you Rosie. I have a question though - why do the wind turbine blades need to be recycled in the first place. It seems like their engineering makes them almost indestructible. Why are so many being replaced?
Very interesting video. Recycling of Rotor blade easy explained. We as the Fraunhofer IWES also working in these Field. We are looking at the advanced recycling methode to sperate the parts from which the rotor blade existing.
I don't see the problem with using landfills for wind turbine blades. It would seem that burying them and forgetting about them would have few environmental downsides? Do these massive structures break down in landfills and leach harmful chemicals? Are there any other hidden environmental or ecological drawbacks to this option that we should be aware of?
Great video, yet again. Easy for non-experts like me to follow. It will be interesting to see whether any of these advanced methods of recycling the blades can be used for any of the other 95% of composite materials.
As the resin is thermoplastic, it has already been heated and vacuum processed most volatile residues have been removed. Since they were also exposed for several years it is likely that whatever might have survived manufacture have also dissipated. As the blade stacks are “interesting” and provide shelter, they may be suitable for artificial reef construction. Granted some type of surface coating might be needed for bio-compatibility or to enhance the ability of coral to bond to the fiberglass substrate. All they do in west Texas is provide rattlesnake and rat habitat.
Hi Rosie, just stumbled upon channel and enjoying it immensely, so far ! ! On a related matter, I'm having trouble finding a decent portable small wind turbine to top up/re charge the lithium batteries in the back of my land cruiser. I do remote long-term wild camping Can you recommend any brands or websites ?
The subject is interesting and it will get more important. Just, the answer is to short. "This Is Why We Don't Recycle Wind Turbine Blades Repurposing wind turbine blades: 7:49 Do we realistically want a million wind turbine blade shaped bridges? 7:56 but I don't want every bike, shelter and playground in the world to look like a hunk of wind turbine blade. 8:01 I don't really think that's a scalable solution. Shredding: 8:19 For example, the shredded material can be incorporated into products"
If Australia was allowed to use nuclear power, especially Molten salt reactors, all these polluting wind turbines and Solar panels would not be needed as we would have reliable baseload power 24/7 for around 70 years.
They have attempted to build molten salt reactors, but they are not cost effective. They start to build them, but then there are huge cost overruns. If molten salt reactors actually worked well, you don't think they would be everywhere by now? The reason you don't see them everywhere is they cost to much.
Repurpose on site to redirect wind in a way your modeling software says will improve efficiency. Use them on site as storage, as shelter, as a culvert or as a barrier. Land fill them on site so they aren't as noticeable. Reprocess on site to fit into standard shipping containers using the industry equivalent of migrant laborers and/or harvester combines. Park them in the closest convenient space until whatever solutions mature to the point someone offers to buy them. The USA can just lay them along our southern border and call it a wall. Just to brainstorm a few ideas.
Join me live at Everything Electric Australia in Sydney February 9-11. Use discount code EEROSIE for 20% of tickets!
I don't feel great about a 20+ hr flight or the carbon footprint it would leave, but id love to join you if you ever tour North America
8:00 The need for reefs in a warming world scales faster than wind turbine blade discards can supply.
Old blades make absolutely perfect reef bones.
See you at the show, wish I knew your discount code when I booked a few weeks ago!
Ocean fish habitats the fish can breed and grow around. The finish of the blades could be made ideal for fast attachment of crustaceans. making degradation no factor. Changing currents to push cooler water towards endangered coral. Iron smelters have giant grinders and CO2 for carbon capture wanting carbon for carbon steel.
As an engineer, why is it that you couldn't look at the spectrometry and see that the very idea of man-made climate change is absolutely preposterous?
Your idea of comparing the turbine composite material consumption to a bike frame is very effective. I'll borrow it! 😄
Surprised me a bit, granted makes sense since how spread out the waste is per capita (or whatever the right term would be)
(Granted in my biased opinion having good Waste-to-Energy infrastructure with materials recovery is worth it regardless!)
Not really because that's two technologies we want more adoption of, so you're making bikes look bad as well. Find something we don't want, like cigarettes or some other stupid product and compare it to that. "You could save a lot more waste by getting rid of this thing that no-one needs..."
@@jonevansauthor I understand what you mean, but the point of this is that both the bike frame and the turbine composite life consumption are a very small amount of material.
It’s not really a good comparison. I have eight bicycles in my household and none of them are made from glassfibre or carbonfibre. 80+% of my electricity comes from wind turbines
@@pmbdk Right, outside of racing, steel bicycles work just fine and steel can be recycled with no loss of quality.
I think the blades could be used for snow fences in Wyoming. And maybe use the blades for wind blocks to solve cross wind problems on some road ways.
Good thinking, we need more ideas like this.
I mean... don't they use hedges for that?
Very inventive! Good idea! Totally bonkers, but good idea!
Why?@@wolfgangpreier9160
@@jonevansauthoryes, but, hedges don't grow everywhere.
I like the idea of converting the blades into rebar. You still get to keep the material advantages of the composite (strong but not brittle, corrosion resistant), while keeping the recycling process simple (cutting the blades into lengthwise strips). You also get around the skate park problem, as rebar is something with a continuous industrial demand.
I also really like that idea. I couldn't find a lot of details about it (no photos yet, it's not mentioned on Regen's website). I only know they're doing that because of a podcast I listened to. I did get in touch with the company to let them know I'd like to know more so hopefully I can feature that solution in more depth in the future.
Rebar is designed like it is for reasons. Strips of scrap turbine blades do not offer the same benefits. It is not just a case of putting long things into the concrete.
@@Dilbert-o5k Why not? You could add new epoxy & fibre bands around the long sections to connect with the concrete, and ditto for tying together different blade sections. This would also solve the corrosion problem that concrete has when water leaks in thru cracks to rust the rebar, expanding it and weakening the whole structure. Maybe the only reason not to is if the sections have different thermal expansion rates.
@@tomtrottier8135 YT disappeared the original reply
Why? You need to look into why rebar is used and what qualities are required. Then compare with strips of scrap wind turbine blades and see whether they match up. Rebar isn't just there as filler.
@user-it7lf7kk8m Good points. Steel is great for rebar because of its high tensile strength. I know that carbon composites can replace steel in *some* applications, but I don't know how well it works here. I'd do know that carbon fiber composite is stiffer than steel, though (and that sounds like a problem in this application to me, though I could be wrong).
We don’t recycle blades here in North America, but we do grind them up and send them to concrete companies for the fibrous material to strengthen the concrete.
Is that not re-using ? Its kind of downcycling , but the CO² locked in the composite remains in the new product , the transport of old blades is relatively cheap they can be cut up,or rough crushed on site to suit the trucks, hell if its a large wind farm refurb / renewa,l the finished crushing could be done on site ,with something like a wood chipper,
There is even research into adding carbon to concrete that shows it can even significantly improve the properties of the resulting concrete... Personally, this approach makes the most sense to me at the moment... In 50 years, the situation may be different, but compared to coal and oil, burying non-toxic material is literally a small thing...
Is that waste ok when it starts wearing out of the concrete? The same is proposed for plastics to be ground down and used in new products. But if it is not melted together then as the item weathers you are getting micro plastics leaching out into the environment and therefore is it really eco? Just a question.
Duh so you do recycle it, you don't seem to understand the term...😂
I heard they were used as fuel to heat the cement kiln.
How about a video on the lifetime of blades, mechanisms of how/why they wear out or fail, what options are there for making blades last longer so there is less need recycle them, etc...
I think a fair fraction of the blades come up not because of end-of- life but because existing wind farms replace their turbines early. With the scaling of power as blade length increases, you could put two 8 MW units in the space of four 2 MW units.
Upgrading an existing site might be better/ easier than opening a new one.
A big problem is that insufficient account was taken for the grinding effect of dust in the wind. Apparently it is grinding down the leading edges of the blades, so the blades are having to be changed earlier than expected.
I considered that. Modern jet engines from GE use carbon fiber fan blades with a metal leading edge, I think it's titanium. Seems like wind turbine blades should do something similar if this is the main reason they need replacement.@@Dilbert-o5k
What dust in the wind? In most places there is very little and even less at sea. If it is really a problem then a thin metal covering of the vulnerable areas ought to stop it.@@Dilbert-o5k
@@Dilbert-o5k Why not resurface? Add material?
If only the general public could be as rational as you are on this topic. Nice video!
Shredding and a role in cement manufacturing seems like perfectly fine ways to solve the problem.
This is done to an extent with Shredded Tires as well. Most plants (at least modern ones in richer countries, re that note on cost will prevent all this short of regulation forcing corporations) already have good Emissions Controls for Sulfur and Particulate Matter so it can handle the Vulcanizing Sulfur and any smoke/dust from the burning.
Negligible sulfur in the Wind Turbine Blades, so should be easier!
My only criticism (although data needed) is this may not work as the volume of old blades grows, and thus the need is greater.
It could still play a part though and hold out until more technologies reach the same Technology Readiness Level
@@ericlotze7724 Seems like there are way more tyres out there than turbine blades. And yeah, my understanding was that shredded rubber tyres added to roads reduced noise pollution.
I can't find the exact number but there seem to be 10's of thousand metric tonnes of wind turbine blades made each year right now. Meanwhile the largest tyre manufacturer, Michelin, makes around 1.5 million metric tonnes of tyres each year.
@@KevinLyda Rubberized Asphalt Concrete is *really* cool! @PracticalEngineering has a great video on Asphalt Concrete if you haven’t seen it yet!
In theory if done with sustainable biomass and/or maybe even somehow getting a Power-to-X workflow to make hydrocarbons that heavy, it could be a form of Carbon Sequestration in Construction kind of deal.
Two things Rosie, you skipped over why these blades are decommissioned in the first place, too small? Cracks? Secondly, having paid a bloody fortune for trusses and beams, it seems to me that simply cutting them up into pieces 14m long and then ripping the cross sections into useful shapes would allow them to be used in all sorts of buildings. Say for cantilevered overhangs that only need to hold up one elephant?
I love the idea of roof structures being made with used turbine blades. I am sure they're going to be excessively strong even if they're retired from their primary role.
I suppose the biggest problem would be manufacturing the brackets to attach them to the other roof components. But if someone had a steady supply of a particular design of turbine, then they could CNC cut a series of brackets that do the job. Perhaps warehouse roofing for the larger blades.
Not enough elephants left.
You would be better finding a use related to London Buses
The first question is addressed in a different post..... Since it's not directly related to recycling it wasn't mentioned....
eherm....Building codes?
@@BobHannent Or have various designs of roofs for different blade sizes, or just use them for long roof spans (hangars?) and use other materials on top for weather protection.
We can’t recycle 80% of household plastic but I’m sure recycling wind turbine blades will be easy!
What about the blade determines that it needs to be replaced? I imagine it wears out at certain stress points. Would it make sense to redesign the blades so they can be repaired? What about aluminum or titanium?
Wind turbine blades are designed to last the same amount of time as the rest of the turbine, in theory everything should wear out at once. And yes there are stress points but a well designed blade would not have any one location significantly more stressed than the rest. They used to use aluminium but there were a lot of fatigue failures. And also the blades would be heavier. I made a video way back in the early days about design lifetime, that talks about all this stuff I think: th-cam.com/video/PfquMx9h98M/w-d-xo.html
@@EngineeringwithRosieSo, the whole tower is a "one hoss shay"?
This revelation is going to incense the trolls and fossil shills with them citing "planned obsolescence" as another reason to reject renewables. 🤣
Hey, everything has a design life and replacement makes room for the next generation/iteration that will perform even better! 👍
I think my response triggered auto moderation for poking fun at fossil s h I l l s. 🤔
Yep. Definitely I'm being deleted for constructive comments
leading edge wear. youd think they would just add in a thin covetic metal layer so it stops !
If you want to find alternative uses for retired blades, ask poorer communities. They will show you things that you regard as, 'out of the box thinking'
Cut these into strips, glue them together like laminated beams and or 2x6 , 4x4 etc .
Getting a good section to cut like that may be difficult due to the more complex shape of wind turbines (they aren’t just a rectangular prism etc)
This is being done to an extent with all that Mechanical Recycling.
This was mentioned around 11:16 or so where they are basically chopping it up into FRP Rebar which seems really neat! FRP Rebar (Carbon Fiber Rebar is also a frequently used term) doesn’t rust like Steel Rebar, so can heavily prolong the life of Concrete Structures!
I had a section about that idea but cut it at the last minute as the video was just so long! Maybe I'll release just that section as a short video or something.
@@EngineeringwithRosie no such thing as ‘so long ‘ for your videos IMO. I’d watch a 3 hour one
@@EngineeringwithRosie Have you considered pairing these videos with longer form content like writing? Perhaps a Medium blog? I'd love to dive deep into some of the stuff you show in the videos along with my weekend morning coffee.
Requires reshaping the blade, which is not practical with the current cross-linked resins.
If only 5% could be recovered, well.. what happened with the remaining 95%? Yep, we all know...Don't get me wrong, I do understand that technology innovation is a continuous process, but wind energy is still far far from being considered sustainable or clean. Perhaps, until then, we should stop calling it as such.
What happens to the blades that makes them have to be retired? Fatigue??
Possibly not a popular view in this realm, but I'm far more concerned about the effects of turbines on birds & their flight paths which wasn't addressed at all.
I'm also not certain why we actually need wind energy when we have so much sun & solar panels are so easy to install & maintain???
Thanks
Thank you!
Thank you for the fact based video! It is so very interesting, and - I feel - still promising and hopeful. Lot's of potential and stuff going still on; this is why I love wind!
9:20 You would recover the “Pyrolysis Oil” and some (or all if just doing gasification) “Syngas”
Both of these could be fed into refineries that currently only use Fossil Fuels to make the Resins.
Also the out of scope effect of these facilities processing Municipal Solid Waste (especially sorted thermosets) and *Sustainable* Biomass.
Granted i am a MAJOR nerd on all this, but I wanted to know your opinion on all that.
(Granted also as you point out the Fiber would need reprocessed, and energy use issues, also if sourced from Fossil Fuels (as most things currently are) it’s basically a Fossil Fuel Thermal Power Plant with more steps)
Carbon taxes need to go up a LOT before synfuels are competitive with digging up fossil hydrocarbons.
@@jamesphillips2285 Sadly yes.
Granted in that case clearing land for Landfills is also more economically sound.
@@jamesphillips2285 "Carbon taxes need to go up" Valid point in some cases, but it fails where the same amount of energy is required to live and work, regardless of the cost. When people can't afford food, heat and/or home payments, money to change to greener energy is just not available, and the worries about green energy drop down in the list of concerns.
Tax where there are convenient and inexpensive alternatives, but not where it causes undue hardship. When people are forced into hardship while alternative approaches are available, they will rebel, and progress will stop, and possibly regress. Support the people, invest in green infrastructure and subsidize its use. Facilitate good living conditions, and far more people would be glad to make the changes. A happy and helpful populace can be a powerful force for progress.
@bakedbeings says "Install them at beaches/lakes as piers to dive off" (recycle them!!) .
Could blades be used for fencing material?
How would you cut and join it?
Mentioned around 7:30
Undoubtedly could be used a million different ways. Problem may be more to do with how to process and market and transport them to achieve that. Then there's the whole subject of cost (especially profitability).
11:57 Oooooo *ANOTHER PROCESS* to rabbit hole down reading up on!
Thank you for the excellent video on this topic that is so talked about.
I wonder if they could slice the blades and re-manufacture them into structural beams for buildings? Have you seen how much timber is now?
Good thinking, we need more ideas like this.
This was mentioned around 11:16 or so where they are basically chopping it up into FRP Rebar which seems really neat!
It would be interesting if someone took a Turbo-saw swing blade sawmill and disassembled a turbine blade into lumber.
anybody heard of ....building codes?
Buildings with people inside are not high school projects.
"This thing fits and looks good. Let's put it in!"
Treat them as high school projects and you get squished people when earthquakes do a visit.
"Oh well they died for the environment anyway. So still, happy thoughts, : )"
@@pbxn-3rdx-85percent Any company manufacturing things would probably get the proper licenses. And as i stated that company making FRP like rebar is probably doing so, if not already done with that process.
Will landfilled wind turbine blades decompose into methane or other greenhouse gases? (Just asking. It seems like a possible concern.)
Lots of things decompose and release methane so that's a fair question! But not wind turbine blades. They are inert. They will stay there for many many many years, and in fact when we develop good recycling methods we'll be able to dig them up and recycle them if want.
@@EngineeringwithRosieTechnically, this is effective CCS! 😉
I say this (tongue in cheek) to people who whinge about inert plastics being landfilled. But it's true....
Really interesting uptime podcast you did about blade bonding BTW....
@@jimurrata6785I honestly love the concept of “Reverse Coal Mining” with a PILE of Sustainable Carbon Fiber, Sustainable Bio or P2X Based Plastics, or even “Inerted Carbon Black” type materials.
Also “Carbon Glass” of that can be scaled up (I would LOVE a Pyramid of giant blocks of it laminated in PACVD Diamond lol)
On the note of “Inerted Carbon Black” I basically am thinking having large piles of Carbon Black has a risk (however small) of something akin to a “Coal Seam Fire”. Adding a Fire Retardant (Probably just a powder like Sodium Bicarbonate, which can be made from Brine in a P2X Manner) prevents this. Also if suspended in a P2X or Sustainable Biomass derived Paraffin Wax, it mag get the interesting property of being moldable, and also potentially sealing things like how Bentonite Clay is used in Landfills.
That’s my rambling, and it takes more infrastructure we don’t have yet, but this along with Enhanced Weathering is how we get things back to normal as we/after we get to Zero Ongoing GHG Emissions.
Most parts of a wind turbine are made from steel, coper and concrete ... oh and a diesel engine to stop them freezing up in the cold.
Hey Rosie, I'm currently working on a start-up dealing with this very issue, and I wanted to thank you for a comprehensive exploration of the challenges involved, and for shining more light to this very important problem we've yet to solve - after 30 years of trying.
Most of what you said we are already familiar with, but some of the recent developments in thermoplastics were new to us. Thank you for including those.
Also appreciate that you proved links to your sources, will definitely be looking into those more.
Two things stood out in what you said - or rather didn't say.
1) Shredding is very energy intensive, and I'm a little surprised you didn't mention it. It was sort of mentioned in the studies you looked at, but the numbers seemed a little off.
2) Shredding + burning before adding into concrete is the most common use for recycled glass fiber today in most of Europe.
I think the best choices for recycling the existing blades is in finding ways to repurpose the material for uses where the unique properties are useful, but would otherwise be too costly to produce. There are some advanced methods for extracting glass fiber, for example Carbon Rivers in the USA has a method with which they claim they can retain over 90% of the original strength of the fibers. But I think these energy intensive methods should be the last in the chain of recycling, after the material can no longer be applied to a new use.
How many blade shaped bridges do we want is a fair question to ask, but that is only one possible use case out of several dozen which would benefit from the material properties.
Thank you again, and look forward to hearing more of your thoughts on this, and other challenges 👍
In Sweden, we already do that. Burns it in the high temperature oven. In severe heat pains. With very high temperatures. The ash is mixed into concrete, and that ash is not cheap. You get a very high quality of the concrete. No problem. Recycling.
Co2 isn not toxit.
That's not recycling..... And in Sweden the laws of physics still apply..... Conclusion still remains the same.....
Nä, tror du nog missade poängen här. Att bara bränna och elda allt man inte vill ha är knappast en bra eller långsiktig lösning. Gör om och gör rätt!
What is the cost to burn them?
And how's burning up fiberglass material is better for environment than nuclear power?
One of your best. Thanks Rosie
Glad you think so!
I love that doc nullified the impact of recycling issues, but still hews to process improvement
Great video. I’ll try connecting with you at the show. Thanks Chris
Thanks for the information I've been eagerly awaiting a video like this.
You did not talk about energy return on energy investment and present some number for various recycling methods.
So its not a problem with the blades per se, it's more that the manufacturing sector isn't required to close the loop on their products life cycle, as is usual for most industries. Thanks for the informative break down.
Closed end industrial life cycles are the exception not the rule. And they most often come about because there's something economically viable to recycle. The composite material of wind turbine blades is not one of those materials.
Surely products that are sold as being the green alternative should have those requirements baked in. Otherwise they are no better than the old products we are being told we must replace
End of service life oil and gas pipelines are not recycled. Why is the focus just on wind turbine blades?
Of course they are. I have a friend whose job is to clean used oil pipes :)
Dont know where you get your information from or if you just make it up. Oil and gas pipelines are recycled almost 100%.
Why wouldn't that steel be recycled?
@@tracyrreed The oil companies just cap them and leave them in the buried in the ground. My nephew works in the pipeline industry and I was very surprised to hear from him that most end of life pipelines are not removed. You would assume they would be flushed out, recycled and surrounding soil replaced . Out of sight out of mind!
Is this a real problem? Buried blades seem pretty benign so I wonder if this is just the oil and gas companies way of making us chase our own tail.
The petrochemical industry produces the resin for the wind turbine blades..... So the lack of recycling just helps their industry expand...
Can I rent your backyard ?
Because Landfills are cheap and not too environmentally harmful pretty much.
As per usual though you laid out a bunch of information and taught me some things, great video as usual!
Thanks!
Thank you!
What a wonderful, concise breakdown of such a wideranging, complicated topic. Kudos! I am in awe.🌻
Thanks for posting this one, I've heard the complaint about them going to landfill so often
As I noted on Patreon: From the argument above I can't see as the energy of the economy is decarbonised by for instance wind turbines that using 3 days worth of energy is particularly relevant, or very costly, and should not stand in the way of avoiding landfill, especially since technologies like windturbines are decoupling energy use from GHG emissions. Right now, and ever more so by the time blades being produced now are scrapped, reducing energy use is less and less important as it is decoupled from GHG. The principle of as much circularity is important, and should be upheld.
This might not work because it is made of plastics and might seep into the sea water by slowly flaking off microplastics which then get eaten by the wildlife.
The counter argument is that by landfilling the blades it is sequestering carbon.
@@nc3826 I am not sure why you would want to sequester carbon, when it is carbon dioxide which is the issue.
It looks as though a comment I made has been auto killed by Google. It was to the effect that googling recycling basaltic fiber shows that it is a very different proposition to fiber glass and carbon fiber. MDMI have hit 90% of the tensile strength of the virgin basaltic fiber in a material in a reycycled material, which also has excellent properties for marine use, when many turbines will be offshore.
@@davidmartin3947 carbon dioxide comes from oxidizing carbon base materials..... sequestering it eliminates that possibility.... So why are you being obtuse about it?
So the bottom line is that there is no existing, cost-effective method of recycling wind turbine blades, and no good near-term prospects.
Honestly, I like the concrete clinker idea. That one seemed practical and immediate. More over it helps deal with the fact that 8% of our CO2 emissions come from concrete (which is something we really can't do without)
Nope this is not the bottom
line!
The bottom line is that using wind energy creates less than 10 grams of waste per person per week. Using anything else is worse.
Actually they recycling them. And the guy who claimed a massive turbine blade burial is fake. Plus Siemens has developed a system about 1 year ago. Add to this modern blade are having longer life.
1:55 - Wind power opponents overstating the turbine waste issue? Say it isn't so!
People complain about wind turbine blades not being recycled, how about the many old fiberglass boats worldwide going to land fill or sunken in our ocean's. At least turbines pay in energy than cost in consumption like super yachts!
And then there's the airline industry. It's my understanding that aircraft are built the same these days - all composite materials, fibreglass, carbon fibre, resin-impregnated.
16:50 if a lot of these are from a sea area, can they not be used as some kind of sea barrier or wave break? I would think it has the right shape.
1. Carbon fibre isn't toxic I think, though I don't know if its a good idea breaking down in waves and impacts and washing up on shore beach? But I still think it could be used as some kind of underwater wave breaker.
2. Coating it in some other materiel to give it a new purpose.
3. Corals?
seems dismissing repurposing is mainly a lack of imagination, would make excellent roof beams and roof shells, just needs some architects to have a go, partner mentions storm water drainage
Heck yeah - cut to the footage of new blades being made in a warehouse made from old blades
We could use shredded turbine blades to help build modular sea-retaining walls, to help combat sea level rise. (No, there won't be enough material to actually do anything useful with it, but the optics of that will completely offset the negative optics of the non-issue this really is.)
I initially had a similar thought, but after thinking about how retaining walls are installed I discarded it....
The following is from a Danish news media (Dr.dk) it is also mentioned in several technical media in Denmark.
The article is 18 months old, so there is a youtuber who has not done her job well enough:
Up to 85 percent of a wind turbine is already recycled today, but the used blades in particular have proven to be difficult to recycle.
But now the wind turbine manufacturer Vestas has developed a method to break down and recycle the used blades.
This is what the industry organization Green Power Denmark writes on its website.
The method involves dissolving the epoxy glue that holds the turbine blades together.
It is "groundbreaking", according to Mie Elholm Birkbak. She is an innovation specialist at Vestas and has helped develop the new method.
- We have found a solution that enables us to break down the wing materials in a way that is so gentle that we don't need to use a lot of energy to do it, and we are in the process of building the necessary value chain to realize the goal of recycling used wing material, she says.
Everything should be recycled or not built in the first place
a few questions: what are the criteria for retiring the blades? Only a set time period, or are they inspected? Assuming the loads on the blades do not exceed the elastic limit and only the surface degrades, could they be resurfaced, kind of like tires are retreaded? How about blades made of aluminum, like plane fuselages? would these be a good topic for another video?
those questions are addressed in this channels other posts
those should never be buried. they should be shredded and reused with new glass-fibre in compression applications like house foundations, (better design) sip walls, etc etc. same as every other item if broken disassemble and only send the broken part (bare minimum) to recycle and reuse all the good parts.
Carbon Rivers (Knoxville, TN) has proven a process to recycle composite materials, including wind turbine blades, into virgin equivalent fibers.
I believe they use the multi stage pyrolysis process developed by Ryan Ginder at UT.
Would you be able to do a video about wind turbines performance and operations in extreme cold weather? In Alberta Canada, all the wind turbines were offline for a few days in Janurary 2024 due to extreme cold below -35c. With the transition away from fossil fuels, how do you see wind turbines fitting into the energy profile of areas of the world that experiences high electrical usage at the same time of extreme cold? Thankyou!
Very cold climates are the only places where nuclear power makes economic sense because of these sorts of issues. Where Rosie comes from (Australia) energy demand is far largest in SUMMER (eg air conditioning). As Rosie points out in other posts a mostly solar grid is a no-brainer for that country but more wind makes sense in northern latitudes. But there will be some places even in the chilly north where wind cannot do the job.
Hi Rosie, a topic suggestion: How large would a turbine need to be so the speed of its blades' ends would reach speed of sound? How much power would it generate, made of what materials, sonic boom a problem? Is this the practical limit? It would make a super interesting video.
The speed of sound is about 343 metres per second. If a blade takes 4 seconds to rotate then the tip would be moving at the speed of sound if it covered about 1400 metres. That corresponds to a blade length of about 220 metres.
Im glad you mentioned Vestas since most videos never mention them.
Their solution for recycling into virgin materials is working, and the materials needed for the process are easily accesable. They are currently working on scaling it up, and it will take a few years until everything is built and in place and ready for commercial use.
I understand why you are a bit hesitant since there are many promises in this industry, and there is not always a delivery on these promises. Which goes for most new tech, especially when they look for investors 😅
Wonder if aircraft dismantlers are helping/leading the way in this field or watching and following what happening due to aircraft not mainly made of metals anymore but being made out of more and more composite materials?
Most airplanes are still made of aluminum; the new composite beasts are stripped and chopped up and ... buried.
Composites fail without warning. Sure, they look and sound cool. They're high-tech, state of the art. Who doesn't like new high tech cool materials?
They'll accuse you of being an old fashioned hard headed old geezer if you don't like new cool high tech materials.
Composites are light and strong and fails without or little warning.
Remember the Oceangate sub? One minute they were fine and then WHOOMP! Pink mist and powdered bones mixing with sea water in less than a second. And where are the carbon fiber pieces? Spread all over the bottom of the ocean, just sitting there and happy as clams.
That is why commercial, transport, military aircraft parts such as wing spars, engine mounts, and fuselage ribs are still made of good ol' metals (aluminum alloys, etc.).
Composite parts are okay for single passenger aircraft. If a wing spar breaks only one person dies screaming while plunging to earth at approximately 9.8 m/s squared as recommended by good ol' gravity.
Has anyone tried to "recycle" blades into low-cost etc housing materials, e.g. roof tiles? Most countries are facing a housing shortage awa an affordable housing crisis with many lower-income & younger people struggling to afford a home of their own. It's a complex issue, but I'm sure access to low-cost materials - such as from old wind turbine blades - would help immensely. Curitiba (Brazil) has an extensive recycling program that does support its low-income housing sector in one form or another.
As a person that will never own my own home, I would never complain if I could construct a whole space for myself using an old blade or two from a dump site - as long as it was safe to do so.
The human race needs a reduction in birth rate in order to mitigate suffering.
What are the “composite materials” and the “resin” made of?
Drop them on the sea floor to make artificial reefs perhaps? That could be very cheap if you put them near the windfarm itself - and useful for sea life.
So that the next maintenance crew boat could not navigate safely ?
@@dmitripogosian5084 I don't know how deep these places are but we do sometimes sink ships to make artificial reefs.
Compare waste blades with coal ash, per person per year.
Why do that? The point is?
If the recent reconsideration of offshore VAWT design pans out, would thermoplastics be strong enough to meet those blade requirements? Maybe with some added support structure?
*Since the 70s, hundreds of millions of tons (!) of glass fiber reinforced plastic have been used for pipes, car body parts, stadium roof, building covering, boat huls etc.*
*Wind turbine blades have so far accounted for less than 0.0x% of this!*
In Europe, larger pieces of glass fiber reinforced plastic are mostly collected and then used as heating material in cement factories.
Really excellent video. This sort of thing is far, far better than the typical coverage in the media.
I've been quite skeptical that the transition could ever truly be green. This video gives me hope. Thank you very much Rosie.
All the fibreglass on your bike is put in the rubbish to so why is it any different 🤔
If the blades are going to be a linear economy, how long before the source dries up? How long before the sink is filled?
Thanks for giving visibility to our research (min 15.35). Happy you found it useful ;)
Fibreglass is extremely not fun to recycle
One thing I do not understand, when a wind mill arrives at end of life, it is usually that the bades are eroded.
A new alternator can be fitted in the nacel or retrofit the old one, why not recoating the existing blade some how to give it back its integrity and remount it on the same windmill. instead of recycling, just rewamp and restart.
Maybe there are effects that I do not, I am just an electrical not a mechanical nor a material expert.
The thermoset polymer and fibers have an effective design life at the core as well as the surface....
Plus, optomial blades keep getting bigger, requiring taller masts, new generators, etc.
Iteration produces more efficient designs, and the wind farmers are looking to profit.
Sometimes (every 20 years?) you may as well upgrade your depreciated inventory for a more modern design
Jimurrata6758 put it well. I’d also add in that given surface wear varies from blade to blade, *and* that there are multiple blade sizes/shapes, short of by hand in some giant hangar, the tooling/process control would be quite difficult.
When making new blades (with recycled materials or not) you don’t need to worry about this.
Although i am no proper expert either! So no worries on that and *i’d love feedback too lol*
In the very early days of this channel I made a video about design lifetime that answers your question in a fair bit of depth. I think it's called something like do engineers design products to fail (I'm on my phone and can't look it up without losing my place in the comments, it's got a yellow thumbnail with a hand drawn wind turbine on it). But the quick answer is that the blades are designed to have the same lifetime as the rest of the turbine. And it's not erosion that determines a blades life, it's fatigue strength. It is possible to repair an eroded blade and operators will always do it because otherwise they'll have to spend far more replacing blades well before the turbines life is up.
@@EngineeringwithRosie ???
I just linked your video here and it's vanished. 🤔
I made a comment up thread about being auto-moderated but I didn't realize that a link to this very channel wouldn't work.
@@ericlotze7724 There are robots that crawl along the blades, grinding cracks and refurbishing the exposed surface (much like you'd repair gelcoat on a boat hull)
But the companies that do this have to get a contract to inspect and repair the whole wind farm.
They're not going to visit a specific blade of a specific tower for this stuff without a lot of $$$
Ameliorating this cost across dozens of towers makes a campaign viable for the operators.
The wind farm would be money ahead just curtailing the one tower until it came to a contracted inspection of the whole farm.
I must thank you for all your work contributing to the mental health crisis in young people. Well Done Rosie!
Are pyrolyzed windmill blade carbon fibres suitable for musical instrument manufacture?
You are under estimating the impact that used or broken wind mills are going to make. This is a very new technology and it's already filling fields with blades that have no particular use for them. If they do have a useful recycling value, why hasn't someone moved that industry to meet the build up of waste created by these used wind mills. Now I am hearing that recently made blades are only lasting 2 years. Don't these blades cost of a million dollars a blade? If so how are we getting any cost effectiveness from them if $4 million of blades have to be replaced every 2 years? Is that why electricity is going up in price. How great is that for the families who are struggling to get by on Bidenomics?
You are misinformed that blades last only 2 years. And you provide the evidence in your comment, they are expensive (hundreds of thousands each unless they are for huge offshore turbines). They make up around 20% of the cost of the turbine and are designed to last 20-30 years depending on the project. If they had to be replaced 10 times in that period, that would triple the cost of the turbine just from the added blade costs. Not to mention the transport and installation costs which are usually more than the blade itself for a replacement after the wind farm is commissioned.
What is your source for the every two years factoid? My source is that I work with wind farms where I know every single blade that gets replaced (it's very rare, you can repair nearly anything on a blade). On a huge wind farm you might see a blade replacement every couple of years (usually far less), out of hundreds of blades on site.
Has anyone thought about chemically decomposing the resins in something like nitric acid or sulfuric acid ? I have used these chemicals in the past to decompose epoxy resins in the past for doing failure analysis of integrated circuits. I used these acids to dissolve the epoxy encapsulation so that the silicon die of failed component can be examined. These processes can be done at fairly low temperatures of 100 - 150C. I would think that glass fiber would hold up pretty well in a strong acid. Not sure about the carbon fiber though.
She mentioned that
Is the blade structure suitable for cutting into dimensional lumber for housing or commercial projects? Perhaps even heavier beams with special hardware for special uses?
Dear Rosie, There is a specific problem with the turbine blades. In strong winds, the turbine blades often fail and break while the turbine is running at high speeds. The rotor blades hit the ground in the surrounding area and then shatter into very small pieces, which then disappear into the grass or the soil. This contaminates a very large area under the ruptured wind turbine. This means that the agricultural land on which a wind turbine burst is unusable for livestock farming and food cultivation for an extremely long time. The problem can only be eliminated if the soil is removed to a depth of at least 60 cm and dumped. The costs are very high and the wind turbine owner often has neither financial provisions nor insurance to solve such problems. The farmers who leased the land then suffer the damage. In Germany this problem is getting worse because wind turbine construction began about 20 years ago and the systems are now at the end of their life. They are often switched off because operating and repair costs are no longer covered by the profit because the government subsidies in addition to the sale of electricity have expired after 20 years. Old wind turbines should therefore be dismantled immediately after decommissioning. A common reason why turbine blades often break prematurely is damage to the gearbox and brake. Here in Germany, wind turbines are often located on agricultural land that is still used for agriculture or livestock farming. In my opinion, it is therefore risky to set up wind turbines on agricultural land.
Some new info for you,,, a wind farm in my area was sold to the landholder after it had been in operation for 23yrs. Now the landholder has since sold his farm because he found the costs to maintain the wind farm was larger than the returns it earned. SO THE INSTALLERS RECOVERED THE COSTS TO FIT THE SYSTEM AND A HANDSOME RETURN ON TOP & NO COSTS TO REMEDIATE THE AREA AND PROFIT FROM ITS SALE !! yes thats the game watch it roll out in your area
I am an engineer living in California. As I travel through the state, I pass large wind farms. These farms have turbines of various ages. There are a fair number of turbines which are not operating. This made me curious about the lifetime of wind turbines. Therefore my question is:
What is the median lifetime of older turbines and what is the predicted lifetime of the newest turbines.
Thank you.
20/30 years? your dreaming!
Can you use them for piers for home foundations
I never quite understood why huge chunks of mostly inert plastic in landfills is in any way worse than the absurd amount of other plastic waste our society creates.
Greening up the cement industry seems like a great idea. It's already a disaster. Or as filler in concrete. Virgin materials are just to cheap I think
Thanks - that was very interesting. I found myself with remaining questions though... with all that strength, what deteriorates to require the blades to be replaced? If the wind farm is in an isolated place, why don't we use them until they snap (or whatever) ? Are the blades replaced after a specific period (years/rotations) or when some probing instrument finds they are becoming weak/have been damaged?
It is probably worth mentioning that there's a whole flock of people who specialize in installing, inspecting, & repairing wind turbines, including the blades. In doing so they help get the maximum lifetime out of each turbine and all of the components thereof.
There is a coal power plant up the road from me. "decommissioned" many many decades ago. Totally still there. All generation infra is hard to recycle.
Grab the profits and run, externalise the costs. No-one to hold responsible after they disolve the company.
One of the problems critics typically have with renewables is the intermittency. During weeks with low renewable potential, we'll still need some sort of fuel to burn for the coming decades. We are doing this with gas, mostly, but i have been brainstorming about saving up all our organic and inorganic waste for those couple of weeks per year where we still need the capacity as a part of the solution. The synergy of burning the turbine blades during periods of low wind is somewhat poetic, and maybe after 2050 we can do it with carbon capture. In a way, burning with carbon capture is the perfect recycling method.
Given how cheap grid storage promises to become in the future, I doubt that burning turbine blades to generate electricity will ever be viable economically. LFP cells are currently $75/kWh in China, and sodium ion will reportedly be 30% cheaper at large scale, so we are talking about $50/kWh. Saltwater flow batteries promise to be even cheaper than that in the future. With dirty cheap storage in the offing, we can solve the variability of solar and wind. It's also worth pointing out that waste incineration generators currently cost roughly 2.5 times more per MWh than solar and wind energy, so incineration generators in general are currently not economically viable. According to one estimate I saw, waste incineration generators cost US$140 per MWh, compared to about US$60 per MWh for new solar and wind farms.
Hi there, sorry if I missed this in your other videos but do you talk about failure modes for wind energy components and ways to prevent them? What would it take to make blades that last at least 100 years? Does it have anything to do with their control algorithms as well?
I hate to state the painfully obvious......landfill space isn't unlimited.....
Great video, thanks.
Great video. Thank you Rosie. I have a question though - why do the wind turbine blades need to be recycled in the first place. It seems like their engineering makes them almost indestructible. Why are so many being replaced?
Wonderful information, Rosie. Thanks. 🙂
Very interesting video. Recycling of Rotor blade easy explained. We as the Fraunhofer IWES also working in these Field. We are looking at the advanced recycling methode to sperate the parts from which the rotor blade existing.
I don't see the problem with using landfills for wind turbine blades. It would seem that burying them and forgetting about them would have few environmental downsides? Do these massive structures break down in landfills and leach harmful chemicals? Are there any other hidden environmental or ecological drawbacks to this option that we should be aware of?
Thanks Rosie awesome info 😁👍
Great video, yet again. Easy for non-experts like me to follow.
It will be interesting to see whether any of these advanced methods of recycling the blades can be used for any of the other 95% of composite materials.
As the resin is thermoplastic, it has already been heated and vacuum processed most volatile residues have been removed. Since they were also exposed for several years it is likely that whatever might have survived manufacture have also dissipated. As the blade stacks are “interesting” and provide shelter, they may be suitable for artificial reef construction. Granted some type of surface coating might be needed for bio-compatibility or to enhance the ability of coral to bond to the fiberglass substrate. All they do in west Texas is provide rattlesnake and rat habitat.
Hi Rosie, just stumbled upon channel and enjoying it immensely, so far ! !
On a related matter, I'm having trouble finding a decent portable small wind turbine to top up/re charge the lithium batteries in the back of my land cruiser. I do remote long-term wild camping
Can you recommend any brands or websites ?
The subject is interesting and it will get more important. Just, the answer is to short.
"This Is Why We Don't Recycle Wind Turbine Blades
Repurposing wind turbine blades:
7:49 Do we realistically want a million wind turbine blade shaped bridges?
7:56 but I don't want every bike, shelter and playground in the world to look like a hunk of wind turbine blade.
8:01 I don't really think that's a scalable solution.
Shredding:
8:19 For example, the shredded material can be incorporated into products"
If Australia was allowed to use nuclear power, especially Molten salt reactors, all these polluting wind turbines and Solar panels would not be needed as we would have reliable baseload power 24/7 for around 70 years.
They have attempted to build molten salt reactors, but they are not cost effective. They start to build them, but then there are huge cost overruns. If molten salt reactors actually worked well, you don't think they would be everywhere by now? The reason you don't see them everywhere is they cost to much.
Repurpose on site to redirect wind in a way your modeling software says will improve efficiency. Use them on site as storage, as shelter, as a culvert or as a barrier. Land fill them on site so they aren't as noticeable. Reprocess on site to fit into standard shipping containers using the industry equivalent of migrant laborers and/or harvester combines. Park them in the closest convenient space until whatever solutions mature to the point someone offers to buy them.
The USA can just lay them along our southern border and call it a wall.
Just to brainstorm a few ideas.
The state of Australian roads with pot holes and shear destruction would be a perfect use for reusing (not recycling) wind blades.