Old joke: when a famous admiral arrived on the bridge, he would unlock a drawer, take out a piece of paper, look at it, put it back and relock the drawer. He died unexpectedly and the first thing his subordinates did was open the drawer. The piece of paper said "port is left, starboard is right".
An easy way to remember which is which is this: The shortest words match up! i.e. port has fewer letters than starboard left has fewer letters than right....
My father's cousin was an old guy at the time and a big time drinker. He told me that the way to remember what color port and starboard lights were was to think of port wine. Port wine is red and thus starboard was was green!lol!
It was smart of them to build something where the name of the country was in like every shot of the shuttle payload bay. Go figure Canada's biggest space contribution was a giant space hockey stick.
@@GeneralSeptem while I get the joke, its a really complicated and amazing piece of tech. This iteration is more like we figured out how to attach the arm to the hockey stick and send it to space. And sent some shoulders ahead of time. 😂
Canadarm and Canadarm2 (the one on the ISS) are such incredibly important inventions. Advanced robotic surgery on earth would never have been a thing if not for innovations made when working on the arms. I'd love if Scott did a full video on them.
My 5 year old son was trying to take pictures of the ISS last night! He will be thrilled to watch this and learn more, many thanks Scott. Edit: Oh no! My kid will see your model is lego, then I'll have to get it. Probably build it too. Tough life as a dad :)
@@linecraftman3907 I wonder if everyone on the ISS was tilting back and forth in their chairs while looking at a static laden view screen. Scotty, more power!
I posted the following in his vid " Measuring the Distance To The Moon Using Only A Smartphone Camera " Scott said " I've asked all of my followers to . .. . " So Scott is the supreme leader of a cult? I knew that red robe was part of his leader regalia not an anomaly. I've uncovered the secret call to order chant " Children Of The Sun , by Billy Thorpe " See the vid " Billy Thorpe - Children Of The Sun (Exclusive Video) " on the channel " Sandman368 Video-Variety-Channel "
Well, if you put the oil rig in orbit, a few jet ski engines would probably be just about adequate for attitude control and orbital corrections. But it would still make an utterly awful jet ski, in the same way that the ISS is an utterly awful "spaceship". Physics is a harsh mistress, but we like dancing a fine line around her when it comes to aerospace stuff.
@@gojewla which makes them even more like the ISS; putting either of them exactly where you want them requires a great deal of power, precision, and patience.
I like how Scott emphases *Fly safe* as the 420 tons space station hurtles through space at insane speeds, dodging specs of paint with the same power as bullets.
Less power, per se, but way more kinetic energy than most bullets. The damage that they could do would also be significantly more, depending on relative velocities.
@@Phroggster it works in our favour that they are moving so fast. Small debris gets turned into plasma the moment it hits the outside whipple shield. Slightly heating the outside of the spacecraft but not penetrating further.
lol "I said I'm Scott Manley, damnit! And I told you to fly f'n safe, or I'll kick your a$$ to the Mun and back! So, F U and the satellite you rode in on, pal!"
Everything since to be working perfectly well after meeting with *hackermicheal50* on instagram finally got my account recovered ❤️❤️❤️you tv *hackermicheal50* on instagram is the only I can recommend to you dear I’ve been scammed so many times 👌👌 *hackermicheal50* on instagram got into my cheating boyfriend account he is a professional hacker🤩🤩 Really appreciate the service of *hackermicheal50* on instagram he’s the brain boss behind getting my hacked account recovered💯💯💯
To anyone who watches 'The Expanse', remember the expression 'a beer can with rockets strapped to it' ? In space, everything is a space ship if you have propulsion.
If I remember correctly Skylab had three large reaction wheels (non-gimbaled gyros) - one on each axis - which NASA used to orient the station. Unfortunately it took a command/service module (CSM) to raise its orbit. If they hadn't used the last CSM on the Apollo-Soyuz mission perhaps it could have been used to boost Skylab high enough to stay in orbit until the Space Shuttle finally flew.
I would like to see a dedicated video by Scott about a relationships between ESA, NASA and Roscosmos and other space agencies. Here is what I am interested in: How and why decisions are made to plan and execute missions. How arguments/different intentions between agencies are being handled. How does finances work to run this project. Who has a final/strongest say about ISS. And so on. Thanks.
@@yes_head Nah! That would be my eight mile beach in Half Moon Bay, a quick suicidel run out to Mavericks for a couple of waves, then back to Moss Beach and the Distillery and a couple of beers! Heavenly!
Everything since to be working perfectly well after meeting with *hackermicheal50* on instagram finally got my account recovered ❤️❤️❤️you tv *hackermicheal50* on instagram is the only I can recommend to you dear I’ve been scammed so many times 👌👌 *hackermicheal50* on instagram got into my cheating boyfriend account he is a professional hacker🤩🤩 Really appreciate the service of *hackermicheal50* on instagram he’s the brain boss behind getting my hacked account recovered💯💯💯
Lego, one of those rare toys that surpassed their original purpose. A bit like the VW bus transmission (?) joint that became the most popular dog toy ! I wish you all the best!❤️
Thank you Scott for explaining this. It just so happens that my kids and I were researching how the ISS adjusts their altitude and attitude for their science class. You rock!!!
6:50-7:12. Soft dock followed by rotational alignment and hard dock. I've never seen the rotation before. Makes sense of course since the vehicle interfaces must line up. Cheers Scott for posting that.
What follows should be prefaced with "If I recall correctly..." I remember seeing a video quite a while ago talking about why the bearings failed on the Hubble and the early reaction wheels on the station. They were made of metal balls running in metal races. With the radiation and electromagnetism they experience on orbit, there would occasionally be static discharges from one component to another causing micro-welding and pitting of the balls and races. After some time in use the pitting would get so bad that the bearing would fail. The problem has been solved by replacing the metal balls in the new bearings with nonconductive ceramic. No more arcing, no more micro-welding. And no more problem.
The issue was the manufacturer of those reaction wheels was also the lowest bid. Any millwright that's been around long enough can tell you what happens to the bearings in a piece of equipment when a welder puts their ground on the other side of a bearing and starts welding away. It's possible they didn't understand that EM interference could cause static discharges within the spacecraft, or they didn't bother looking into it. But the solution was upgrading to ceramic bearings, which aren't actually purpose built for that specific task, but are in fact industry standard bearings that aren't that much more expensive than steel bearings.
Small correction. The problem hasn't really been "solved". They switched to ceramic bearings before the metallic ones even started failing. It's just a happenstance that the new ceramic ones do not have the welding problem that was later discovered in older metallic ones.
This is one of the most interesting piece on the ISS, I’ve learned many new facts, thanks Scott. About the debate if it a space ship or not, this is my check list comparing it to a cargo seafaring ship: 1) go about the surface of the Earth in space or water, check 2j can change course and speed (slowly and carefully), check 3) can perform docking, check 4) transport goods and people, check 5) have sides identified as port and starboard, check 6) everybody (except FEer) believe it exists lol, check 7) Lego makes models of it, check HEY it’s a “space”ship.
" These 'little things' (the Control Moment Gyros) are steering a 420 ton space station..." and by the way, this space station is racing around the earth at a speed of 27,576 km/hr....
And a single SSRMS(Space Station Remote Manipulater System aka CANADArm-2) while not being strong enough to hold itself up on the surface of Earth against its own weight, is strong enough on-orbit to fully manipulate the position of the entire almost 1 million pound ISS.
The complexity of orbital mechanics and space stuff in general is truly mind boggling. So many things to take into account, and it’s hardly automated, someone just had to think this through. I’m genuinely shocked every time I learn something new and wonder about the realities of commercial space flight which needs to be almost entirely automated.
I’ve heard the opening quindar tone check conversation to this channel before. It was Houston testing the global phone line/ long wave radio communications hardware with one of the repeater stations in Australia used to broadcast out to the Apollo spacecraft. The radio operator in Houston would simply say to the station in Australia, “1-2-3-4-5-5-4-3-2-1 end of test”‘with a quindar open tone/close tone between each number.
*hackermicheal50* on Instagram just helped me gain access to my cheating girlfriend phone *hackermicheal50* on Instagram just helped me gain access to my cheating girlfriend phone wow 😯 I never believed that now I can monitor all his chats thanks I’m grateful forever🥰🥰🥰 I can guarantee you that there is no hacker like *hackermicheal50* he is just too good for hacking jobs , you can get through him to get your hack jobs done perfectly well for you with this contact +19172659676
Very bold of you to hold your ISS and rotate it around with confidence. I'm terrified of mine falling apart just moving it from one place to another...
Microgravity experiments are usually performed in a free fall environment, where the apparatus is subjected to weightlessness, but there's still a small gravitational gradient; the parts that are closer to the Earth are pulled slightly more than those further away, inducing a small tidal force. That's why we say "microgravity" and not "zero gravity"; they're still in a gravitational field. The point of my question is because during manoeuvres, especially when using the larger thrusters, weightlessness is lost and, like the camera shown in the video, things begin to fall. That will have a small but not insignificant effect on any ongoing experiment.
They can't get out of small accelerations during burns, so they just have to take that into account with their data or (if possible) not perform experiments during burns. Luckily the burns are low acceleration and don't last long compared to the duration of the experiments. Some of the scientific payload racks have a device called ARIS which robotically cancels vibrations, so the experiment at least won't be perturbed by dockings, astronauts using the exercise machine, etc. if a group opts to get their experiment installed in one of the locations where that's available.
@@user-pb4hh1jk3f I see. Thank you for that. I guessed that they'd keep detailed logs of any accelerations, however small, which they could cross-reference when looking at the results. I wasn't aware how they kept their experiments isolated though. That's quite interesting. Cool username, by the way.
The docking procedeure is very reminiscent of how I dock in KSP. Always disable SAS right before contact, and make sure one of the spacecraft is just holding attitude.
Awesome video. My Dad told me 'no red port left in the bottle' so I could get colour of the boat lights correct. Later I added that 'starboard' is a bigger word than 'port' and 'right' is a bigger word than 'left'.
Really great explanation on the inner workings of the ISS...I learned more with your video than from any other source I've found. Thanks and keep up the outstanding content !
[On opening up the Control Moment Gyros that were returned from orbit, and finding bearing fused from heat...] "That's just a sort of great illustration of the amount of energy and force that is going on inside these CMGs..." To me, it's a great illustration of the failure to lubricate adequately! Fred
Couldn't the ISS use magnetorquers to desaturate the reaction wheels? I don't know if the ISS has magnetorquers but if they did wouldn't it make more sense than expelling propellant?
It WOULD, since they only use electricity, the problem is the magnetic field (despite being strong overall) is actually quite weak locally, so there just isn't enough torque being produced.
A quick question, is there an astronaut designated "Pilot" on board at all times who makes the ultimate decisions when the station needs to be 'flown' or is everything so automated that would be redundant?
There is always a designated commander who has final say. While most such decisions are made by ground control, it's important to have someone actually on the space station who is in charge.
@@stevens8354 Yes I'm aware of that, what I meant was the ground control has more information and manpower to analyze the information about ISS and the earth's orbit that it seems logical to me they are the ones calling shots on what has to be avoided and how, and controlling the engines. I'm not even sure if the station has it's own way of detecting the debris... (though I wouldn't be surprised if it had).
Fuck man.... I remember when watching you like 6-7 years ago on your brilliant ksp series... .basically learning all the interesting stuff from you... and look at you now where you got with your channel. Congrats man, happy for ya! :)
This outpost is truly the best thing mankind ever achieved. Because of international cooperation. They should allows chinese & all other countries to participate (even for LOP-G). Anyway, big thank you Scott :)
Coincidentally my coworker and I were discussing this yesterday lol Actually we were curious about how they pump or distribute fuel threwout the ISS. We figured it must be always a nail biting experience
Its over already? Never thought about any other maneuvers that ISS perform than rising the orbit! Damn Scott I could listen to your lectures for hours!
While you were describing things and showing the orientations using the Lego model, I flashed back to the film (and novel) of Arthur C. Clarke's _2010: Odyssey 2._ The general design of the Russian (Soviet?) spacecraft in the film is similar in many ways to the ISS, while the Discovery is more like the Apollo designs. Thanks as always for the interesting content!
I am perpetually amazed at the realization of how empty my life was before I discovered Scott Manley. And I was a social cat who was in several bands before then... But Scott makes my brain feel loved.
Literally asking myself this question earlier today, and then I see this video uploaded. I know generally how this works, but I’m sure this will explain in detail. Thanks man. Haha
I would love an episode going more in-depth on how gyros work for spacecraft. Why do most spacecraft use thrusters for rotation instead of gyroscopes? Wouldn't the lack of required reaction mass be a massive boon especially for long-term missions?
I remember there's one interview from a shuttle flight on youtube (one if those 20-30min post flight conferences) that they show the crew on a shuttle experiencing the acceleration from the maneuvers to dockwith the ISS (more like playing around actually)
It's fun to know that things that happens regularly in KSP has a real life counterpart (having to deactivate SAS for docking to work and SAS wobbling space stations to destruction).
Old joke: when a famous admiral arrived on the bridge, he would unlock a drawer, take out a piece of paper, look at it, put it back and relock the drawer. He died unexpectedly and the first thing his subordinates did was open the drawer. The piece of paper said "port is left, starboard is right".
The reverse side of the paper read "When in doubt, Full Ahead out".
Heh... I heard this same joke but for accounting. The paper said "debits on the left, credits on the right."
An easy way to remember which is which is this:
The shortest words match up!
i.e. port has fewer letters than starboard
left has fewer letters than right....
My father's cousin was an old guy at the time and a big time drinker. He told me that the way to remember what color port and starboard lights were was to think of port wine. Port wine is red and thus starboard was was green!lol!
@@glenkeating7333 :-) I was taught a variation of that - drunk sailors get left in port
As a Canadian I love hearing Scott call the Canadarm the Canadarm rather than "the robotic arm"
It was smart of them to build something where the name of the country was in like every shot of the shuttle payload bay. Go figure Canada's biggest space contribution was a giant space hockey stick.
I feel that we know so little about DEXTRE.
@@GeneralSeptem while I get the joke, its a really complicated and amazing piece of tech. This iteration is more like we figured out how to attach the arm to the hockey stick and send it to space. And sent some shoulders ahead of time. 😂
As a german that sounds a little like a joke as "Darm" means intestines.
Canadarm and Canadarm2 (the one on the ISS) are such incredibly important inventions. Advanced robotic surgery on earth would never have been a thing if not for innovations made when working on the arms.
I'd love if Scott did a full video on them.
My 5 year old son was trying to take pictures of the ISS last night! He will be thrilled to watch this and learn more, many thanks Scott.
Edit: Oh no! My kid will see your model is lego, then I'll have to get it. Probably build it too. Tough life as a dad :)
I'm 22 and just saw it in this video and had to go straight to Amazon to order it
Your son will also see the 8:13 moment... :-)
How about the Saturn V and the LEM?
ha ha.... yeah, I feel for you!
you are a good dad
Commander: “Brace for turbulence.”
Crew: “Sir we’re in space.”
Admiral Adama: “No listen to him.”
hahahaahahaha nice one
@@linecraftman3907 I wonder if everyone on the ISS was tilting back and forth in their chairs while looking at a static laden view screen. Scotty, more power!
@@bobroberts2371 and then the terminals start sparking and someone falls over with third degree burns.
@@cosmicrider5898 Only the red shirts. And don't forget pipes falling from the ceiling and lots of steam.
@@bobroberts2371 And rocks :)
So the Kraken attacked the station in 2009? They should have checked their auto struts..
Danny could have spagettified the station AND ended the universe.
Bloody Karen's everywhere!
lmao i'm death
xyz Kraken, not Karen... Kraken is much more horrible and you will know if you play ksp
Not gonna lie if I was on board while that was happening the force of me shitting my pants could've raised the orbit all by itself
Scott just elevated himself to a god-like being
He can push the ISS with his finger against vacuum!
Just?
Everything is relative.
I posted the following in his vid " Measuring the Distance To The Moon Using Only A Smartphone Camera "
Scott said " I've asked all of my followers to . .. . " So Scott is the supreme leader of a cult? I knew that red robe was part of his leader regalia not an anomaly. I've uncovered the secret call to order chant " Children Of The Sun , by Billy Thorpe " See the vid " Billy Thorpe - Children Of The Sun (Exclusive Video) " on the channel " Sandman368 Video-Variety-Channel "
A very manly god-like being.
0:40 "I can now justify why lego is on my buisness expenses"
So it’s a spaceship with utterly awful propulsion, the way an oil rig is an utterly awful jet ski.
😆
Well, if you put the oil rig in orbit, a few jet ski engines would probably be just about adequate for attitude control and orbital corrections.
But it would still make an utterly awful jet ski, in the same way that the ISS is an utterly awful "spaceship".
Physics is a harsh mistress, but we like dancing a fine line around her when it comes to aerospace stuff.
More like a rather heavy space caravan that needs to get towed (pushed) periodically to keep it in the field (in orbit).
Some oil rigs are affixed to the sea bed.
@@gojewla which makes them even more like the ISS; putting either of them exactly where you want them requires a great deal of power, precision, and patience.
I like how Scott emphases *Fly safe* as the 420 tons space station hurtles through space at insane speeds, dodging specs of paint with the same power as bullets.
Less power, per se, but way more kinetic energy than most bullets. The damage that they could do would also be significantly more, depending on relative velocities.
@@Phroggster it works in our favour that they are moving so fast. Small debris gets turned into plasma the moment it hits the outside whipple shield. Slightly heating the outside of the spacecraft but not penetrating further.
Nice
@@lmaoroflcopter HOw big object in orbit should be to destroy station
@@dzonikg Scott has done a really good video on it. Recommend watching that one.
If anyone needs a stock photo of Scott to use in an article or something, just pause at 8:13 and take a screencap. LOL
Perfect
lol "I said I'm Scott Manley, damnit! And I told you to fly f'n safe, or I'll kick your a$$ to the Mun and back! So, F U and the satellite you rode in on, pal!"
Everything since to be working perfectly well after meeting with *hackermicheal50* on instagram finally got my account recovered ❤️❤️❤️you tv
*hackermicheal50* on instagram is the only I can recommend to you dear I’ve been scammed so many times 👌👌
*hackermicheal50* on instagram got into my cheating boyfriend account he is a professional hacker🤩🤩
Really appreciate the service of *hackermicheal50* on instagram he’s the brain boss behind getting my hacked account recovered💯💯💯
@@mistresskimberly326 shut up bot
To anyone who watches 'The Expanse', remember the expression 'a beer can with rockets strapped to it' ? In space, everything is a space ship if you have propulsion.
If I remember correctly Skylab had three large reaction wheels (non-gimbaled gyros) - one on each axis - which NASA used to orient the station. Unfortunately it took a command/service module (CSM) to raise its orbit. If they hadn't used the last CSM on the Apollo-Soyuz mission perhaps it could have been used to boost Skylab high enough to stay in orbit until the Space Shuttle finally flew.
I would like to see a dedicated video by Scott about a relationships between ESA, NASA and Roscosmos and other space agencies.
Here is what I am interested in:
How and why decisions are made to plan and execute missions.
How arguments/different intentions between agencies are being handled.
How does finances work to run this project.
Who has a final/strongest say about ISS.
And so on.
Thanks.
All that might be covered by the Space Station Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA); a web search gives more info about it.
No, No, No! The desert side of the bay!
Except now he's in the wine and cheese side of the bay. :-D
(Or maybe it's the egg side of the bay.)
@@yes_head Nah! That would be my eight mile beach in Half Moon Bay, a quick suicidel run out to Mavericks for a couple of waves, then back to Moss Beach and the Distillery and a couple of beers! Heavenly!
Today I found out the Russians drive the ISS. I hope it has a good dash cam. :)
And a shit music collection.
@@riparianlife97701 Hopefully they have hardbass collection inside cupola
It has plenty of footage
Everything since to be working perfectly well after meeting with *hackermicheal50* on instagram finally got my account recovered ❤️❤️❤️you tv
*hackermicheal50* on instagram is the only I can recommend to you dear I’ve been scammed so many times 👌👌
*hackermicheal50* on instagram got into my cheating boyfriend account he is a professional hacker🤩🤩
Really appreciate the service of *hackermicheal50* on instagram he’s the brain boss behind getting my hacked account recovered💯💯💯
a realy deep joke!
"I have a lego model of ISS". The joy on his face is so real and beatiful. That's what man needs. No sex. Just LEGOs.
I have an old one, witch is missing some things
@@ReptilianLepton depends on the wife
@@ReptilianLepton a man can share his collection with his best friend too
"Guys literally only want one thing and it's fucking disgusting"
At last! I can claim legos as a legitimate business expense!
Lego, one of those rare toys that surpassed their original purpose.
A bit like the VW bus transmission (?) joint that became the most popular dog toy !
I wish you all the best!❤️
@RocketSurgeon thank you so much for the correction ❤️
Is there a video about that? sounds like excellent trivia to just...know.
Or the actual dog toy that people use as a dildo
I think Scott was just looking for a reason to show off his Lego ISS lol
I have a feeling Scott made this video just to flex his ISS Lego model
Thank you Scott for explaining this. It just so happens that my kids and I were researching how the ISS adjusts their altitude and attitude for their science class. You rock!!!
Gives insight when I create the follow up to my Indian Space Station video. Thank you
A tonne of insight
There you are
@@sidharthcs2110 yesss
@@GareebScientist apne video me ye info dalna mat bhulna.. its great info
Good to see you here too buddy :D
6:50-7:12. Soft dock followed by rotational alignment and hard dock. I've never seen the rotation before. Makes sense of course since the vehicle interfaces must line up. Cheers Scott for posting that.
Watch from 6:40.
8:13 Anyone else catch Scott Manley flipping the bird off at us!! Lol Well played Scott, well played. Haha
I was looking for comments like this lol
3:04 Scott manley subtly confirming that he is, in fact, a god, who has taken our form in order to teach us how to become a type 3 civilisation.
Thanks Scott - now i know that ISS can fly safe and how :)
Kerman
Its pronounced "zvezdA", emphasis is on A. Means "star" in russian (but Scott probably knew that).
pretty nice to see that the only complaint about the video content is pronunciation
It's leviOHHHsa, not levioSAHHH
8:10 "might adjust from its normal orientation"
Scott might want to think about what his hands are saying when he's using his hands to talk.
Thanks Scott. I didn't realize how maneuverable the ISS is. I thought it just hangs there in orbit. Great info!
What follows should be prefaced with "If I recall correctly..."
I remember seeing a video quite a while ago talking about why the bearings failed on the Hubble and the early reaction wheels on the station. They were made of metal balls running in metal races. With the radiation and electromagnetism they experience on orbit, there would occasionally be static discharges from one component to another causing micro-welding and pitting of the balls and races. After some time in use the pitting would get so bad that the bearing would fail.
The problem has been solved by replacing the metal balls in the new bearings with nonconductive ceramic. No more arcing, no more micro-welding. And no more problem.
He was the one who made the video, if we are talking about the same one.
I wouldn't be at all surprised.
I'm not sure that's hubble, but let me go find the video
The issue was the manufacturer of those reaction wheels was also the lowest bid. Any millwright that's been around long enough can tell you what happens to the bearings in a piece of equipment when a welder puts their ground on the other side of a bearing and starts welding away.
It's possible they didn't understand that EM interference could cause static discharges within the spacecraft, or they didn't bother looking into it.
But the solution was upgrading to ceramic bearings, which aren't actually purpose built for that specific task, but are in fact industry standard bearings that aren't that much more expensive than steel bearings.
Small correction. The problem hasn't really been "solved". They switched to ceramic bearings before the metallic ones even started failing. It's just a happenstance that the new ceramic ones do not have the welding problem that was later discovered in older metallic ones.
This was awesome, I was on the Oculus Quest with Mission: ISS looking at the parts and hearing Scott describing! what a delight.!
Why does "Fly Safe" sometimes sound like a threat? lol
look up Eve Online, one of his past-times. ;-)
scott, i love these kinds of videos. nuggets of trivia that are infinitely interesting and you organize them together in a very fluid way.
Great video as usual
This is one of the most interesting piece on the ISS, I’ve learned many new facts, thanks Scott.
About the debate if it a space ship or not, this is my check list comparing it to a cargo seafaring ship:
1) go about the surface of the Earth in space or water, check
2j can change course and speed (slowly and carefully), check
3) can perform docking, check
4) transport goods and people, check
5) have sides identified as port and starboard, check
6) everybody (except FEer) believe it exists lol, check
7) Lego makes models of it, check
HEY it’s a “space”ship.
" These 'little things' (the Control Moment Gyros) are steering a 420 ton space station..." and by the way, this space station is racing around the earth at a speed of 27,576 km/hr....
And a single SSRMS(Space Station Remote Manipulater System aka CANADArm-2) while not being strong enough to hold itself up on the surface of Earth against its own weight, is strong enough on-orbit to fully manipulate the position of the entire almost 1 million pound ISS.
The complexity of orbital mechanics and space stuff in general is truly mind boggling. So many things to take into account, and it’s hardly automated, someone just had to think this through. I’m genuinely shocked every time I learn something new and wonder about the realities of commercial space flight which needs to be almost entirely automated.
Oh my, the piping must be a pain if they move the propellant that far
Awesome vid. Reminds me of the opposite forces my gyros felt on my submarine that fed momentum to navigation. Well done m8t.
6:50 TIL that turning off the SAS during docking to prevent attracting the Kraken is legit in real life too.
I’ve heard the opening quindar tone check conversation to this channel before. It was Houston testing the global phone line/ long wave radio communications hardware with one of the repeater stations in Australia used to broadcast out to the Apollo spacecraft.
The radio operator in Houston would simply say to the station in Australia, “1-2-3-4-5-5-4-3-2-1 end of test”‘with a quindar open tone/close tone between each number.
"“I’m Scott Manley, fly slightly tipsy!”
*hackermicheal50* on Instagram just helped me gain access to my cheating girlfriend phone *hackermicheal50* on Instagram just helped me gain access to my cheating girlfriend phone wow 😯 I never believed that now I can monitor all his chats thanks I’m grateful forever🥰🥰🥰
I can guarantee you that there is no hacker like *hackermicheal50* he is just too good for hacking jobs , you can get through him to get your hack jobs done perfectly well for you with this contact +19172659676
As always, Mr Manley, you've given us the deep dive that all of us space buffs crave. You are the Man!
So, more Lego, but the Saturn V is still in wrong position. (The black dots should be faced to the LUT).
Not to mention a fake LUT that’s a scam...
Very bold of you to hold your ISS and rotate it around with confidence. I'm terrified of mine falling apart just moving it from one place to another...
Sounds like what I do in KSP after docking, turn off RCS to keep out of orientation docking from occurring.
i turn off my RCS after i dock not to keep the orientation but to stop draining monoprop.
I get everything lined up and on approach, then turn off sas and rcs to make sure they don't wobble apart
This was a fascinating video. I'll think of it whenever I see the station fly over. Scott's posts are so filled with interesting information.
I'm curious, what effect does all this manoeuvring have on all the microgravity experiments?
That's why it's microgravity, instead of zero gravity
What kind of question is this
Microgravity experiments are usually performed in a free fall environment, where the apparatus is subjected to weightlessness, but there's still a small gravitational gradient; the parts that are closer to the Earth are pulled slightly more than those further away, inducing a small tidal force. That's why we say "microgravity" and not "zero gravity"; they're still in a gravitational field.
The point of my question is because during manoeuvres, especially when using the larger thrusters, weightlessness is lost and, like the camera shown in the video, things begin to fall. That will have a small but not insignificant effect on any ongoing experiment.
They can't get out of small accelerations during burns, so they just have to take that into account with their data or (if possible) not perform experiments during burns. Luckily the burns are low acceleration and don't last long compared to the duration of the experiments. Some of the scientific payload racks have a device called ARIS which robotically cancels vibrations, so the experiment at least won't be perturbed by dockings, astronauts using the exercise machine, etc. if a group opts to get their experiment installed in one of the locations where that's available.
@@user-pb4hh1jk3f I see. Thank you for that. I guessed that they'd keep detailed logs of any accelerations, however small, which they could cross-reference when looking at the results. I wasn't aware how they kept their experiments isolated though. That's quite interesting.
Cool username, by the way.
Love the SA Corey (Expanse) books on the shelf in the background.
„let me show you it’s features“ ... missed opportunity
The docking procedeure is very reminiscent of how I dock in KSP. Always disable SAS right before contact, and make sure one of the spacecraft is just holding attitude.
Starship will be as big, it can even serve as a space station
Yeah the ISS will be docking to Starship lmao
Best part of my day is learning interesting tidbits from you Scott! Thank you!
"NASA always has its plans figured out" can I get that on a t shirt? Lol
Awesome video. My Dad told me 'no red port left in the bottle' so I could get colour of the boat lights correct. Later I added that 'starboard' is a bigger word than 'port' and 'right' is a bigger word than 'left'.
I've tried this with noodly KSP craft. It never ends well. XD
Very interesting, I like the use of a prop in this video
Last time I was this early starhopper was about to fly
I had no idea how big the CMGs were until you showed the shot of the spare with an astronaut. They are big!
Does the Space Station flex a measurable amount when maneuvering? I imagine it's designed to be very stiff
It is probably measurable, but still insignificant in most considerations
When the resonant vibration took hold, it’s flexibility was challenged.
Really great explanation on the inner workings of the ISS...I learned more with your video than from any other source I've found. Thanks and keep up the outstanding content !
14:30, i guess they forgot to check their staging?
[On opening up the Control Moment Gyros that were returned from orbit, and finding bearing fused from heat...]
"That's just a sort of great illustration of the amount of energy and force that is going on inside these CMGs..."
To me, it's a great illustration of the failure to lubricate adequately!
Fred
Couldn't the ISS use magnetorquers to desaturate the reaction wheels?
I don't know if the ISS has magnetorquers but if they did wouldn't it make more sense than expelling propellant?
It WOULD, since they only use electricity, the problem is the magnetic field (despite being strong overall) is actually quite weak locally, so there just isn't enough torque being produced.
Bloody hell! Sounds like rocket science! Very interesting.
A quick question, is there an astronaut designated "Pilot" on board at all times who makes the ultimate decisions when the station needs to be 'flown' or is everything so automated that would be redundant?
I think it's the control room guys on the earth, who decide that no? They have all the necessary information about the orbit debris etc...
There is always a designated commander who has final say. While most such decisions are made by ground control, it's important to have someone actually on the space station who is in charge.
@@stevens8354 Yes I'm aware of that, what I meant was the ground control has more information and manpower to analyze the information about ISS and the earth's orbit that it seems logical to me they are the ones calling shots on what has to be avoided and how, and controlling the engines. I'm not even sure if the station has it's own way of detecting the debris... (though I wouldn't be surprised if it had).
@@stevens8354 yeah, that's what I assumed, I can envision a couple scenarios that would require a designated person in control.
How fun. Another fantastic episode Scott! Fly safe
Kinda makes you wonder how Sci-Fi stations like Starfleet Earth Spacedock work...
By the Power of Plot!!! And a lot of handwaving :)
This video is very appropriate right now.
WAIT is the lego ISS a set?
Link in the description
I just searched this topic two days ago !!!! And now your video ??? Awesome luck for me ! Well done mate.
Important question: have you ever sat down and played with this? like, pretended to dock the shuttle or anything? cause I would hands down do that
Pft.... He simulates a docking every night
Fuck man.... I remember when watching you like 6-7 years ago on your brilliant ksp series... .basically learning all the interesting stuff from you... and look at you now where you got with your channel. Congrats man, happy for ya! :)
Where else would I learn such things! Thank you for compiling all this. I even brought my son to come see all your Lego builds.
Best videos on the tube by far. Keep them coming. Thanks
This outpost is truly the best thing mankind ever achieved. Because of international cooperation. They should allows chinese & all other countries to participate (even for LOP-G). Anyway, big thank you Scott :)
Interestingly, China uses the APAS docking standard, so it theoretically could be possible. But they're banned because of politics, sigh
Excellent, excellent video Scott Manley, you are truly the man!
How happy he is, while showing off his toy :)
Coincidentally my coworker and I were discussing this yesterday lol
Actually we were curious about how they pump or distribute fuel threwout the ISS. We figured it must be always a nail biting experience
This is an interesting one, thanks.
OH MY GOD! I almost fell off my chair when I saw the "The Expanse" books in the background!
Its over already? Never thought about any other maneuvers that ISS perform than rising the orbit! Damn Scott I could listen to your lectures for hours!
Scott i love your use of the lego model. Once i saw you using your i grabbed mine and was able to follow along.
MechJeb loves to resonate my ISS to pieces!
While you were describing things and showing the orientations using the Lego model, I flashed back to the film (and novel) of Arthur C. Clarke's _2010: Odyssey 2._ The general design of the Russian (Soviet?) spacecraft in the film is similar in many ways to the ISS, while the Discovery is more like the Apollo designs.
Thanks as always for the interesting content!
A dedicated space tug is needed. Without one, these guys will never make warp.
This man is a gem
Man Scott, I’ve learned so much from watching your videos! Thank you for doing this! Scott’s are the best! 😁
I am perpetually amazed at the realization of how empty my life was before I discovered Scott Manley. And I was a social cat who was in several bands before then... But Scott makes my brain feel loved.
I love how the model playing with the ISS on the Amazon page is a grown man.
Literally asking myself this question earlier today, and then I see this video uploaded. I know generally how this works, but I’m sure this will explain in detail. Thanks man. Haha
They should slap a few more ion engines on it and gradually push it out to lunar orbit. Gotta be cheaper than building something from scratch...
3:05 "some god-like force pushing it"
Guess Nauka gained divine powers while waiting to go to space.
That ATV looked badass.
Covered so many questions I had. Great work.
I would love an episode going more in-depth on how gyros work for spacecraft. Why do most spacecraft use thrusters for rotation instead of gyroscopes? Wouldn't the lack of required reaction mass be a massive boon especially for long-term missions?
Absolutely fascinating- thanks Scott
I remember there's one interview from a shuttle flight on youtube (one if those 20-30min post flight conferences) that they show the crew on a shuttle experiencing the acceleration from the maneuvers to dockwith the ISS (more like playing around actually)
To think that we could build such a thing and do it all on orbit is just mind blowing
Cool model and cool explanations thank you .
Dodging space debris sounds a bit scary , you would want to have plenty of notice it was coming .
It's fun to know that things that happens regularly in KSP has a real life counterpart (having to deactivate SAS for docking to work and SAS wobbling space stations to destruction).