Hello, in the daily car vibration and noise testing process, such as idle testing, is it better to pay attention to the RMS value and use energy correction? When should amplitude correction be applied? Thank you, looking forward to your reply
When calculating a RMS level in Simcenter Testlab and most other commercial software, energy correction is automatically used to get the correct value, even if amplitude correction was applied during the measurement. So the RMS will always be energy corrected. This allows amplitude correction to be used for visualizing spectrums and autopower as, but still get correct RMS. PSD measurements usually have energy correction applied: Some additional resources: community.sw.siemens.com/s/article/root-mean-square-rms-and-overall-level and community.sw.siemens.com/s/article/window-correction-factors
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 96 | คู่เอก "คมอาวุธ vs พันฤทธิ์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ofERaO0gOsE/mqdefault.jpg)
Great video, really insightful... thank you
Hello, in the daily car vibration and noise testing process, such as idle testing, is it better to pay attention to the RMS value and use energy correction? When should amplitude correction be applied? Thank you, looking forward to your reply
When calculating a RMS level in Simcenter Testlab and most other commercial software, energy correction is automatically used to get the correct value, even if amplitude correction was applied during the measurement. So the RMS will always be energy corrected. This allows amplitude correction to be used for visualizing spectrums and autopower as, but still get correct RMS. PSD measurements usually have energy correction applied: Some additional resources: community.sw.siemens.com/s/article/root-mean-square-rms-and-overall-level and community.sw.siemens.com/s/article/window-correction-factors
@@SimcenterTesting get， thanks