If the 'theory' of causality is correct, then every moment of existence is both a 'cause' and and 'effect'. Simultaneously! So, even if this 'theory' is correct (it ain't), what is the point? You cannot identify any distinction between a 'cause' and an 'effect' because(?) there is none. So again, any essential distinction between the two is illusory, but it is pragmatic under certain circumstances/Perspectives. Like making the kiddies believe that a demon will gobble them up if they go down the old abandoned mine. The illusion makes their lives a bit more comfortable. A good scientific reason why 'causality' is not possible is; "The Laws of Nature are not rules controlling the metamorphosis of what is, into what will be (ie; Karma). They are descriptions of patterns that exist, all at once... " - Genius; the Life and Science of Richard Feynman All 'eternity' at once; Here! Now!! Reality is not linear, it is Holistic! ;)
If the 'theory' of causality is correct, then every moment of existence is both a 'cause' and and 'effect'. Simultaneously!
So, even if this 'theory' is correct (it ain't), what is the point? You cannot identify any distinction between a 'cause' and an 'effect' because(?) there is none. So again, any essential distinction between the two is illusory, but it is pragmatic under certain circumstances/Perspectives. Like making the kiddies believe that a demon will gobble them up if they go down the old abandoned mine. The illusion makes their lives a bit more comfortable.
A good scientific reason why 'causality' is not possible is;
"The Laws of Nature are not rules controlling the metamorphosis of what is, into what will be (ie; Karma). They are descriptions of patterns that exist, all at once... " - Genius; the Life and Science of Richard Feynman
All 'eternity' at once; Here! Now!!
Reality is not linear, it is Holistic! ;)