Is Tributary System In Chinese History A Bad System?|Chinese History|Kenny Chinese Culture Vlog

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 3

  • @Xanctus
    @Xanctus 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Guys in the configuration button you can choose the speed yourself. just choose. 1.25

  • @CARL_093
    @CARL_093 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    👍👍

  • @laiquangminh631
    @laiquangminh631 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't think China' s tributary fair in any mean. China didn't protect or support stability in region at all.
    1) First of all, creating division between barbarian states was official foreign policy of china from the start. China always actively encourged infighting between its neighbors. Example were how Han China encourged infighting between normad tribes like between South Xiongnu and Northern Xiongnu.
    2) In all of this system long existence, Imjin War was only and only time China really use military intervention to protect its tributary states (without use this as reason to annex its neighbors). And this war was out of norm because Japan main goal was using Korean as base to attacke China. Therefore, this China intervention can explained as purely self interest. Other China's tributary state - Dai Viet never recieved any China military support in its existence (don't count support for Viet Nam communism in morden area). Even worse, China dynasty used fake reason as restoriation of Tran dynasty to invade Dai Viet in 1406, after defeat Ho regime, Ming dynasty annexed completly Dai Viet.
    3) 2 other intervention attempts in colonial period were First Sino-Japanese War and Sino-French in Korean and Viet Nam were not conducted because China want to protect 2 countries but protect buffer zone between China and Japan, China and French