Trek 100 backpacks are the best! The only negative to me is the size and weight, 50 liters is overkill for a daypack. Osprey has the Stratos 24, 26, 34, 36, Gregory has the Zulu 30, Rab and Lowe Alpine have 30 liter eaon backpacks... Will you ever make a backpack under 40 liters that has a lighter weight as a daypack and has the same adjustable harness system as the Trek 100?
When is the updated version scheduled to be released? I have the MT500 version and hungering for a slightly larger one. Extremely happy with my MT500 so intend to stick with Forclaz, but rather wait for the updated version 😊
Oh, when will the New Version come out? I'm in need for a backpack wider than 38cm and the trek 100 just has 30cm. So my sleeping bag and tent won't fit sideways in :( The mt900 looks very nice (and wide enough) to me but it's heavy :(
I bought a 50L Trek100 after watching Luke's review and it is an incredible pack. One of the best looking and best designed packs and I have and I have quite a number. And for $100 it's a great deal. It's what I would recommend a new person to.
Hey Luke! Awesome review as usual, however this time I feel it's maybe too unforgiving. I say this because I went to Decathlon to get the Trek 100, but when I actually compared it I thought that the MT900 was built stronger with better padding, bottle holder is better, etc. I don't see why an adjustable system is so important, since once it is set, I don't touch that setting. Regarding the price, here in Canada the MT900 retails at 230$ while the Osprey Atmos AG 65 is 370$ for the LT and 440$ for the regular version, so not a fair comparison in this case. Yes, there's a difference of 2 pounds, but the capacity is way bigger... so when fully loaded, I don't think I'll feel those 2 pounds of difference. And indeed, the design itself is old, I had a backpack in this exact same configuration 15 years ago, but after switching to a pocket-less design, I found myself missing that occasional flexibility. Also, the version in your review has been updated, although the differences are minor, apart for the main comportment that can be opened all the way now. Cheers!
I have the black version of this bag and got it when it was on special for $120 USD here in Australia back in 2021 - Took it 380km across the arctic circle in the far north of Sweden at the end of last year and it held up to everything I threw at it. I rucked approx. 23kg in this thing and never did I feel uncomfortable at any point. This pack is mainly designed with long-distance cross-country skiiers and snow shoers in mind, and that is exactly who I am in those envirnments - It isn't, however, a pack that I would recommend for someone rucking through the warmer portion of the shoulder seasons and definitely not the summertime; there are far better bags for that purpose.
I have this pack... so a few comments. Without the brain it's about 5.5lbs. Yes, it is heavier the 70L MT100 mainly due to extra internal lining, second water bottle holder, straps and main compartment lid. But the brain comes off, unlike the MT100, and you can add on a lot of stuff on top. I also have the MT100 and ultralight backpacks, but this pack is for hauling 50lbs- 70lbs and ability to attachs extra to the outside. I think on the sale price it is worth it, if you are looking to haul winter gear (and then some) short distance to a camping site and need to have the ability to attach things to the outside. It probably shouldn't be your only backpack, but for it's price (even at $200) there aren't many sturdy packs that can carry a lot of weight with all these features.
just bought the MT900 Symbian 70L yesterday, i was thinking in cetting my money back after watching this video...I'll do more research before taking a decision, thank you.
i bought it in germany for 140€ (150 dollars) and have now been on the road with it a few times in the swiss alps. for me personally, the backpack is just great. it was super comfortable the whole time and all my stuff was always super organized. for this price, i can just completely recommend such a big backpack with the amount of features.
I have a 71 liter Mystery Ranch glacier, a bit more money and what I’ve learned is you need to stick to 50-60 liters. The problem is more room means more stuff and your weight goes up. My pack goes about 54 lbs I’m sure if I didn’t have the space I’d cut some stuff out.
I have the 55+10 version that I bought for $100 when I was trying to find a Trek 100 bag. 100% agree with everything here. Here's hoping the next MT900 iteration takes lessons from the Trek 100 design, but keeps all the things I love (two water bottle holders, webbing on access panel, "rip-away" access panel, internal compression straps). Right now I only use my MT900 as a photography bag. For heavier trips when i'm not useing a lightweight bag it's largely been replaced by my Osprey Aether.
I have the black version of this bag and got it when it was on special for $120 USD here in Australia back in 2021 - Took it 380km across the arctic circle in the far north of Sweden at the end of last year and it held up to everything I threw at it. I rucked approx. 23kg in this thing and never did I feel uncomfortable at any point. This pack is mainly designed with long-distance cross-country skiiers and snow shoers in mind, and that is exactly who I am in those envirnments - It isn't, however, a pack that I would recommend for someone rucking through the warmer portion of the shoulder seasons and definitely not the summertime; there are far better bags for that purpose.
@@Funkteon Thanks for the heat reminder! I was planning to buy one, but I live in Brazil and now I just realized that I could search better. As I'll use mostly in hot regions (almost 40°C)
THE best reviewer on the interwebs when it comes to outdoor gear . PERIOD! I wish I lived in the States because it hike with you in a hot minute mate. Love from Wales in the UK.
The only only channel to come for an honest review not an endorsement in return for free stuff like some other channels , you get to know the good and bad points before parting with your hard earned cash.
I bought the 90+10, I was going for the 70 but got the 90 instead, I love this back pack, the weight is not an issue for me, the material used is very strong, the reason why I bought it was for the 'back loading' option, no more packing in your stuff according to use, everything is right there when you open it, and i'm still not using all of the pockets! It's a great back pack!
1) Overpriced in the USA, in europe the price is much more reasonable 2) I have the 90+10L version, its bigger brother. I agree with your views on the 70+10
I got the trek 100 after your review for hunting and fishing hiking trips and its brilliant for me especially as I am not the fittest guy. It is super comfy and fits what I need and it does not move around when I am up and down hills! great stuff
I have this backpack for over a year now and used it extensively through all seasons. I would say that for me 30 kg is the comfortability limit of the pack. Had a trip in the mountains for a week, started with an approx 33 kg load and when dropped this couple of kilos it is substantially more bearable, otherwise you just feel the weight more than using larger pack. Direct access from the back is unmatched when I'm carrying a lot of roping gear for training in the local park or gym. You just take what you need and keep things organized inside, instead of spilling everything on the ground. But pricepoint is out of hand, I got my for around $100.
I actually bought the decathalon forclaz trek 100 70 l bcuz of your review.. I absolutely love it. Looks like they took a good thing and tried to re- market it for more money. Thanks for your work… very best 🍻
I have the 50+10 version. I love the 2 access points. Open up the front and fill it up. Then when I realise what I've forgot to put in, i open the top and stuff it in, and cram my helmet down on top of that. I'm happy with the padding, but that's because I rarely have it full. I got it to go climbing, single pitch stuff. Easily carrys a full rack, ropes, shoes etc and my gf doesn't have to bring anything. It is quite heavy. When I do use it I only have to carry it for an hour at a time, which is probably as long as you should carry it. If you're carrying it longer than that, get something more streamlined.
I needed a backpack. The trek100 70 liter is always out of stock. I didnt want to pay $210 for this pack either. Found multiple online codes and got it down to $145 and was happy with that. Ive taken this out on 3, eight to ten mile round-trip back country camping trips, completely loaded down due to sub-freezing conditions, and found it comfortable "enough". The side pockets on the waist belt are indeed worthless.
€160 in Europe, i remember the time when that brand was first price ... of course i wouldn't have bet my life then in harsh conditions with their gear but now the offer has widely increased, also in quality and you can now find this gear in the same price range as many famous brands...
i have the forclaz 90+10 and i have to say it is an amazing backpack it is huge and can cope with everything you throw at it you can load an enormous amount of gear and it has travel with me far and wide and never let me down. Thanks for your always informative and agenda free reviews
For a 80 liter pack, you should be able to be comfortable carrying big loads. I personally don't need anything that big especially when I can pack heavier weight in my smaller pack then this one and still be more comfortable. The most I carry is roughly 28 pounds and that is not often. I appreciate your reviews Luke, we appreciate you.
I hope the trek 100 doesn’t go impossible to purchase for better than a year now because of the review, that is what happened last time you reviewed it. I have been thinking about picking up the 100.
These two backpack were two that I had my sights on, last year. I went for the "Forclaz MT500 Air 60+10" (the orange/bright brown one) by Decathlon. I haven't used it yet, but it feels good to wear. Hope I won't regret it.
i was just about get get this pack for 140 pounds but just checked out the mt100 and grabbed that for 60 pounds so thanks for the help and great information!
Luke I’ll stick with my 100 Leiter Alpine freight pack. I really like everything about it. Yes, I bought the exsturnal frame, and the bag seperately but that didn't matter to me. I needed a new backpack. I like this pack; I like the frame to be on the outside of my pack, she works for me. Lastly, I can pack, and go with this size of pack. Great video. Your right, a backpack, any backpack must work for the person carrying it.
Hello Luke. Thank you 😊 for your honesty and for sharing your thoughts about this backpack. Your opinion means a lot to most of your subscribers. I agree that it does cost too much money. That's the problem with the world today because everyone is making all prices no matter what it is, go skyrocketing. They don't care if it's good quality or not just do long as their price is higher than the others. Thank you for sharing and for all the hard work and time you put into these videos. It truly is appreciated. We all trust your opinions. We know you are an honest man and you are here to help us so we don't get taken advantage of. I wish everyone knew that instead of getting on here with bad comments about you. I can't say it enough Thank you, Thank you, Thank you. Stay Awesome buddy KEEP ADVENTURING GOD BLESS YOU 🤗HUGS🤗
My partner and I use the exact two Decathlon backpacks mentioned in the video, we've had them for about 3 years now and I agree with a lot of your insight on the cons to the MT900. That said, the price difference in UK/EU used to be much smaller in 2020/2021, AFAIR the MT900 was 99GBP and the other one was 89GBP which makes them significantly cheaper than the Osprey backpacks which usually cost above 130GBP and (AFAIK) are seldom available on big discounts. In defence of the MT900, the 10L removable top comes very handy if you set up camp under a mountain and want to just take the essentials with you to climb to the top, which is what we do quite often. Also the slanted bottle pockets are a gamechanger that I really appreciate in a backpack. The more gear we replaced with less space-consuming options, the more we stopped having the need for bags that are 70L+, and Decathlon sell a pretty decent MT500 40L backpack for 69GBP which shares a lot of the pros of its bigger brother and at ~2.8lbs is much more manageable.
Solid review. No maybe baby kind of statement. Clear conclusion and advise. Great to see Decathlon responding.... I simply love their products, but even them don't get it 100% right all the time
Thanks for the review! I hope you get an opinion on Decathlon mt900 tents .. I want to get one but I need to know is it waterproof. Greetings from Bulgaria ! 🇧🇬
Spot on review and I visited decathlon this week and noticed how much of their merchandise has increased substantially in price. For not much more I could go buy branded and better value products elsewhere
Hey there! Hope you read this. I'm a big consumer of Decathlon products. Here in Portugal is the go to store for comercial camping and travel gear. My ideia for this pack is that it's not a hiking or backcountry bag. Seem to be a more interrail type of product. A interrail ia a popular journey that mostly young people do across Europe where they travel btw countries for a month using only trains. It's a very fast moving type of trip, so a backpack it's the best possible way of carrying your stuff. Normally can be one of the first European trips young people do, so that's maybe why it's big and no very technical. Decathlon does this a lot where you make a product thinking about something specific but their marketing thinks otherwise. The number of pockets seem to be for less experience people backpacking, specially when it comes to organization. Hope this helps. Would love to see more Decathlon reviews in your channel for sure
Thank you for your review, and your content in general. Something that would personally interest me is your opinion of Berghaus Packs. They are very popular in the military where I'm from, and I would love to hear your thoughts about them. Maybe even compared to your Savotta packs.
I have an old 55L backpack from Decatlon as well... It is 3.1/3.2kg (including rain cover). It it adjustable, but not comfortable. Has many pockets, but not practical. The loading/unloading of the pack cannot be made by the top. I call it the suitcase backpack... But this is the only backpack I have for backpacking :c I have been looking for an upgrade, but I don't have all the gear I need for overnight trips... So I am waiting to know what capacity I need.
Decathlon is big here in Spain and I have a few bits and bobs from them. Some are good, some are just average. It's a usual pack, in my opinion. Keep up the reviews mate💪🏴
I currently see this version of the MT900 at 160$CAD, (because a newer version is out) vs the MT100 at 130$, not a huge difference in price. But The MT100 is still 800gr (nearly 2 pounds) lighter. I dont understand why the MT900 is so heavy.
Your reviews are excellent and very informative. I have purchased items based on your reviews the past. I know this maybe a tall order but have you considered doing a review on kuiu backpacks?
I have the mt500 air 50+10. The features on the forclaz are great, for the £90 I paid. You can see a slight decrease in quality when compared to an exos 58, however, at half the RRP its certainly not 50% worse than an osprey. I'm glad I have mine as a back up.
sounds to me like they only really thought about volume when it comes to inner storage. ive noticed budget items are not as compact but at the end of the day 80L of space that only handles 35lbs is highly limited in use for that pricetag . cheers for another great review
You seem to be paying a fair chunk extra in the US for this pack..It's in my local Decathlon for 160€ which is around 170$... Dear still though, but cheaper in Europe. The Trek MT100 is only 90€ here... good deal.
I have this backpack (bought it 160 euro in France) and I like so much the full front panel opening that I think it's an essential feature for a pack of this size. Anybody has suggestions of other similar backpacks with such feature? I'm looking for a tactical one but they seem heavier and this feature is often absent or much less pratical.
Very interesting, especially after your Trek 100 review. I bought one following that and concur exactly with your thoughts on it. Can't undertand why that "easyfit" system of adjustment isn't universal? I think though, Decathlon stuff is perhaps better priced in Europe? I paid about £68 for my Trek 100 70 litre, stunning value. Thank you.
i had this version .. after 100k of Făgăraș ridge i return it . the padding in the hip area crumbled ..so that suked in the rest i was very hapy with it
Mate, with all respect, Osprey Atmos AG is 2x more expensive than MT900 Symbium (yes, it's not Symbian). I agree that this Forclaz is quite heavy, but if you compare it with a similar featured backpack from Tatonka - let's take Yukon 70+10 - its weight is also 2.6 kg. Deuter Aircontact Core or X will be also 2.5-3.1 kg. So it not so dramatically differ from others. I would better say that MT900 Symbium have some design disadvantages (lack of an isolated bottom section) and some issues when heavy loaded (when about 30 kg - the back waist pad is too small and soft, so it begins to put unpleasant pressure on the lower back, and when it's wet, it rubs it). The thing I like in MT900 Symbium is shock-absorbing suspension - it works great when you need to jump from somewhere. And it looks durable as hell.
The price of $210 is not worth spending on this Decathlon unit. I totally agree on your selection of Osprey's AG, one of the most comfortable backpacks I have ever used.
I have the Teton Outdoors Explorer 4000, very happy with it. This doesn't seem much of an upgrade to me. Similar size (65 vs 70), weight and materials. Obviously, the front flap is a nice feature but $210...OUCH! Got mine for like $60 or $70.
Tell us again how expensive this pack is Luke🤣 Nice review, well done of course. Different strokes for different folks they say. Strange the same company makes a more realistically usable pack, close in size and way less expensive. I don't get it but they obviously designed this by intention. Thanks for honest, fair opinions. Take care.
Do you know the Swedish outdoor brand Lundhags? They just released a complete new series of amazing looking backpacks. The Saruk Pro/Expedition screams for a review. I'll maybe get one for myself soon.
Bought the Trek 100 as a stopgap, and it has become my favourite winter/shoulder season pack. Can't go wrong. Love Osprey (my other three packs are from them) but am so not doing the Atmos.
$200 for a pack that will last for years, is not that much imo. Highly recommend people to try out what feels good for them, and if it's a costly one, buy it anyway. You'll be happy you did once you are on the trail!
I bought this backpack in Germany for 159 Euro, that's totally fine for me. Last trip I loaded 25 Kg, that's limit to me but was doable over 60 km ... so far my experience don't know why it's so expensive at your place. I not would've spent 210 € for this either. But it's very robust I need to say.
I bought mine a few years ago for $100. Back then it was called the Trek 900 70 + 10. Insane to charge $200 + for this. The shoulder straps and waste belt suck with mushy padding and abrasive mesh. The pack is made from 600 polyester. and the zipper pulls are crumbling off of mine (not really a big deal). What I like about the pack is the actual design. What I find confusing about this review is that he talks about other better packs from Forclaz; however, they have the same flimsy shoulder straps/waistbelt as the one being reviewed. ?????
Hello Luke,Excellent review. I was looking forward to watch your opinion about this bag, especially after I saw it in Decthlon, next to the Folcraz 100. Your review strengthen my decision back then to go with your recommendation, as my first big backpack. Keep up with the professional, honest and concise reviews.
I have the black version of this bag and got it when it was on special for $120 USD here in Australia back in 2021 - Took it 380km across the arctic circle in the far north of Sweden at the end of last year and it held up to everything I threw at it. I rucked approx. 23kg in this thing and never did I feel uncomfortable at any point. This pack is mainly designed with long-distance cross-country skiiers and snow shoers in mind, and that is exactly who I am in those envirnments - It isn't, however, a pack that I would recommend for someone rucking through the warmer portion of the shoulder seasons and definitely not the summertime; there are far better bags for that purpose.
Right now I want to buy a backpack but Im kinda confused with so many options. Mt100 Mt 500 Mt900 and dont know exacly the pros and cons between each model. I migbt get this Mt100 that costs 90€ but gonna study a bit more the exact differences with other bags in Decathlon
My load out for a weekend is about 35lbs, and using a 60L pack I still usually have a little room to spare. What on earth is the point of an 80L pack if it can't comfortably carry more weight than my 60L? What are people supposed to do with the extra 20L? Bring a full sized pillow?
Hey Luke I'm Confused.....during your review you said that the pack comes in TWO colors... Grey and black.......the pack you Are showing is BLUE......???
If I'm carrying a 70+L pack, I better be climbing a mountain or I'm carrying too much gear. I'm way too short for things that size. Even in the Corps, I was miserable with whatever iteration of a large pack happened to be the flavor of the decade. I'll stick with the 40s and 50s and leave the luxuries at home 😂
Thanks for your review, happy to see that you loved the MT100 ;) We hope you'll like the next version of MT900 when it comes out!
Trek 100 backpacks are the best!
The only negative to me is the size and weight, 50 liters is overkill for a daypack.
Osprey has the Stratos 24, 26, 34, 36, Gregory has the Zulu 30, Rab and Lowe Alpine have 30 liter eaon backpacks...
Will you ever make a backpack under 40 liters that has a lighter weight as a daypack and has the same adjustable harness system as the Trek 100?
When is the updated version scheduled to be released? I have the MT500 version and hungering for a slightly larger one. Extremely happy with my MT500 so intend to stick with Forclaz, but rather wait for the updated version 😊
Oh, when will the New Version come out?
I'm in need for a backpack wider than 38cm and the trek 100 just has 30cm. So my sleeping bag and tent won't fit sideways in :(
The mt900 looks very nice (and wide enough) to me but it's heavy :(
I bought a 50L Trek100 after watching Luke's review and it is an incredible pack. One of the best looking and best designed packs and I have and I have quite a number. And for $100 it's a great deal. It's what I would recommend a new person to.
@@erikmf next spring ;)
Hey Luke! Awesome review as usual, however this time I feel it's maybe too unforgiving. I say this because I went to Decathlon to get the Trek 100, but when I actually compared it I thought that the MT900 was built stronger with better padding, bottle holder is better, etc. I don't see why an adjustable system is so important, since once it is set, I don't touch that setting.
Regarding the price, here in Canada the MT900 retails at 230$ while the Osprey Atmos AG 65 is 370$ for the LT and 440$ for the regular version, so not a fair comparison in this case.
Yes, there's a difference of 2 pounds, but the capacity is way bigger... so when fully loaded, I don't think I'll feel those 2 pounds of difference. And indeed, the design itself is old, I had a backpack in this exact same configuration 15 years ago, but after switching to a pocket-less design, I found myself missing that occasional flexibility.
Also, the version in your review has been updated, although the differences are minor, apart for the main comportment that can be opened all the way now. Cheers!
I have the black version of this bag and got it when it was on special for $120 USD here in Australia back in 2021 - Took it 380km across the arctic circle in the far north of Sweden at the end of last year and it held up to everything I threw at it. I rucked approx. 23kg in this thing and never did I feel uncomfortable at any point. This pack is mainly designed with long-distance cross-country skiiers and snow shoers in mind, and that is exactly who I am in those envirnments - It isn't, however, a pack that I would recommend for someone rucking through the warmer portion of the shoulder seasons and definitely not the summertime; there are far better bags for that purpose.
Can you elaborate? Why ok for skiing/snowshoeing, but not for summer?
I have this pack... so a few comments. Without the brain it's about 5.5lbs. Yes, it is heavier the 70L MT100 mainly due to extra internal lining, second water bottle holder, straps and main compartment lid. But the brain comes off, unlike the MT100, and you can add on a lot of stuff on top. I also have the MT100 and ultralight backpacks, but this pack is for hauling 50lbs- 70lbs and ability to attachs extra to the outside. I think on the sale price it is worth it, if you are looking to haul winter gear (and then some) short distance to a camping site and need to have the ability to attach things to the outside. It probably shouldn't be your only backpack, but for it's price (even at $200) there aren't many sturdy packs that can carry a lot of weight with all these features.
You mean floating lid... Ppfff brain... 😆
just bought the MT900 Symbian 70L yesterday, i was thinking in cetting my money back after watching this video...I'll do more research before taking a decision, thank you.
i bought it in germany for 140€ (150 dollars) and have now been on the road with it a few times in the swiss alps. for me personally, the backpack is just great. it was super comfortable the whole time and all my stuff was always super organized. for this price, i can just completely recommend such a big backpack with the amount of features.
I have a 71 liter Mystery Ranch glacier, a bit more money and what I’ve learned is you need to stick to 50-60 liters. The problem is more room means more stuff and your weight goes up. My pack goes about 54 lbs I’m sure if I didn’t have the space I’d cut some stuff out.
I have the 55+10 version that I bought for $100 when I was trying to find a Trek 100 bag. 100% agree with everything here. Here's hoping the next MT900 iteration takes lessons from the Trek 100 design, but keeps all the things I love (two water bottle holders, webbing on access panel, "rip-away" access panel, internal compression straps). Right now I only use my MT900 as a photography bag. For heavier trips when i'm not useing a lightweight bag it's largely been replaced by my Osprey Aether.
I have the black version of this bag and got it when it was on special for $120 USD here in Australia back in 2021 - Took it 380km across the arctic circle in the far north of Sweden at the end of last year and it held up to everything I threw at it. I rucked approx. 23kg in this thing and never did I feel uncomfortable at any point. This pack is mainly designed with long-distance cross-country skiiers and snow shoers in mind, and that is exactly who I am in those envirnments - It isn't, however, a pack that I would recommend for someone rucking through the warmer portion of the shoulder seasons and definitely not the summertime; there are far better bags for that purpose.
@@Funkteon Thanks for the heat reminder! I was planning to buy one, but I live in Brazil and now I just realized that I could search better. As I'll use mostly in hot regions (almost 40°C)
THE best reviewer on the interwebs when it comes to outdoor gear . PERIOD! I wish I lived in the States because it hike with you in a hot minute mate. Love from Wales in the UK.
The only only channel to come for an honest review not an endorsement in return for free stuff like some other channels , you get to know the good and bad points before parting with your hard earned cash.
I bought the 90+10, I was going for the 70 but got the 90 instead, I love this back pack, the weight is not an issue for me, the material used is very strong, the reason why I bought it was for the 'back loading' option, no more packing in your stuff according to use, everything is right there when you open it, and i'm still not using all of the pockets! It's a great back pack!
1) Overpriced in the USA, in europe the price is much more reasonable
2) I have the 90+10L version, its bigger brother. I agree with your views on the 70+10
I got the trek 100 after your review for hunting and fishing hiking trips and its brilliant for me especially as I am not the fittest guy. It is super comfy and fits what I need and it does not move around when I am up and down hills! great stuff
I have this backpack for over a year now and used it extensively through all seasons. I would say that for me 30 kg is the comfortability limit of the pack. Had a trip in the mountains for a week, started with an approx 33 kg load and when dropped this couple of kilos it is substantially more bearable, otherwise you just feel the weight more than using larger pack. Direct access from the back is unmatched when I'm carrying a lot of roping gear for training in the local park or gym. You just take what you need and keep things organized inside, instead of spilling everything on the ground. But pricepoint is out of hand, I got my for around $100.
Just bought a Trek 100 70L because of your review! I loved the backpack!! It's very light!
I actually bought the decathalon forclaz trek 100 70 l bcuz of your review.. I absolutely love it. Looks like they took a good thing and tried to re- market it for more money. Thanks for your work… very best 🍻
I have the 50+10 version. I love the 2 access points. Open up the front and fill it up. Then when I realise what I've forgot to put in, i open the top and stuff it in, and cram my helmet down on top of that. I'm happy with the padding, but that's because I rarely have it full. I got it to go climbing, single pitch stuff. Easily carrys a full rack, ropes, shoes etc and my gf doesn't have to bring anything. It is quite heavy. When I do use it I only have to carry it for an hour at a time, which is probably as long as you should carry it. If you're carrying it longer than that, get something more streamlined.
I needed a backpack. The trek100 70 liter is always out of stock. I didnt want to pay $210 for this pack either. Found multiple online codes and got it down to $145 and was happy with that. Ive taken this out on 3, eight to ten mile round-trip back country camping trips, completely loaded down due to sub-freezing conditions, and found it comfortable "enough". The side pockets on the waist belt are indeed worthless.
€160 in Europe, i remember the time when that brand was first price ... of course i wouldn't have bet my life then in harsh conditions with their gear but now the offer has widely increased, also in quality and you can now find this gear in the same price range as many famous brands...
i have the forclaz 90+10 and i have to say it is an amazing backpack it is huge and can cope with everything you throw at it you can load an enormous amount of gear and it has travel with me far and wide and never let me down. Thanks for your always informative and agenda free reviews
For a 80 liter pack, you should be able to be comfortable carrying big loads. I personally don't need anything that big especially when I can pack heavier weight in my smaller pack then this one and still be more comfortable. The most I carry is roughly 28 pounds and that is not often. I appreciate your reviews Luke, we appreciate you.
Reminds me a lot of the Fjallraven Kajka - but with some much-needed improvements like the gear loops on the outside and the web pocket on the inside.
Good to know. By the way, thanks for the great musical choices. Thanks for the extended musical bumper ending, too.
I hope the trek 100 doesn’t go impossible to purchase for better than a year now because of the review, that is what happened last time you reviewed it. I have been thinking about picking up the 100.
These two backpack were two that I had my sights on, last year. I went for the "Forclaz MT500 Air 60+10" (the orange/bright brown one) by Decathlon. I haven't used it yet, but it feels good to wear. Hope I won't regret it.
Hey mt900 symbium vs mt500 Air 60+10L
Many thanks for the heads-up .... thinking about buying a new pack some day soon. Decathalon sell this backpack for just under £140 in the UK ....
i was just about get get this pack for 140 pounds but just checked out the mt100 and grabbed that for 60 pounds so thanks for the help and great information!
Luke I’ll stick with my 100 Leiter Alpine freight pack. I really like everything about it. Yes, I bought the exsturnal frame, and the bag seperately but that didn't matter to me. I needed a new backpack. I like this pack; I like the frame to be on the outside of my pack, she works for me. Lastly, I can pack, and go with this size of pack. Great video. Your right, a backpack, any backpack must work for the person carrying it.
Hello Luke. Thank you 😊 for your honesty and for sharing your thoughts about this backpack. Your opinion means a lot to most of your subscribers. I agree that it does cost too much money.
That's the problem with the world today because everyone is making all prices no matter what it is, go skyrocketing. They don't care if it's good quality or not just do long as their price is higher than the others.
Thank you for sharing and for all the hard work and time you put into these videos.
It truly is appreciated.
We all trust your opinions.
We know you are an honest man and you are here to help us so we don't get taken advantage of. I wish everyone knew that instead of getting on here with bad comments about you.
I can't say it enough Thank you, Thank you, Thank you.
Stay Awesome buddy
KEEP ADVENTURING
GOD BLESS YOU
🤗HUGS🤗
My partner and I use the exact two Decathlon backpacks mentioned in the video, we've had them for about 3 years now and I agree with a lot of your insight on the cons to the MT900. That said, the price difference in UK/EU used to be much smaller in 2020/2021, AFAIR the MT900 was 99GBP and the other one was 89GBP which makes them significantly cheaper than the Osprey backpacks which usually cost above 130GBP and (AFAIK) are seldom available on big discounts. In defence of the MT900, the 10L removable top comes very handy if you set up camp under a mountain and want to just take the essentials with you to climb to the top, which is what we do quite often. Also the slanted bottle pockets are a gamechanger that I really appreciate in a backpack.
The more gear we replaced with less space-consuming options, the more we stopped having the need for bags that are 70L+, and Decathlon sell a pretty decent MT500 40L backpack for 69GBP which shares a lot of the pros of its bigger brother and at ~2.8lbs is much more manageable.
Solid review. No maybe baby kind of statement. Clear conclusion and advise.
Great to see Decathlon responding....
I simply love their products, but even them don't get it 100% right all the time
i love watching your reviews. i only buy gear now you back up. thank you for saving me from the old trial by fire
That MT 900 was running $139 for a few weeks around the holidays. I own the trek 100 70L and I do like it.
I did buy that red backpack you recommended. It’s awesome, definitely worth it.
Thanks for the review! I hope you get an opinion on Decathlon mt900 tents .. I want to get one but I need to know is it waterproof. Greetings from Bulgaria ! 🇧🇬
Spot on review and I visited decathlon this week and noticed how much of their merchandise has increased substantially in price. For not much more I could go buy branded and better value products elsewhere
Hey there! Hope you read this. I'm a big consumer of Decathlon products. Here in Portugal is the go to store for comercial camping and travel gear. My ideia for this pack is that it's not a hiking or backcountry bag. Seem to be a more interrail type of product. A interrail ia a popular journey that mostly young people do across Europe where they travel btw countries for a month using only trains. It's a very fast moving type of trip, so a backpack it's the best possible way of carrying your stuff.
Normally can be one of the first European trips young people do, so that's maybe why it's big and no very technical. Decathlon does this a lot where you make a product thinking about something specific but their marketing thinks otherwise. The number of pockets seem to be for less experience people backpacking, specially when it comes to organization.
Hope this helps. Would love to see more Decathlon reviews in your channel for sure
That is what their travel line is supposed to do, not the Mt one (mountain trekking)
Thanks for this video. Thanks to him, I made the decision that I could find another backpack. Cheaper and more suitable.
Thanks!
Thank you very much for the support Toprun. - Luke
Thank you for your review, and your content in general.
Something that would personally interest me is your opinion of Berghaus Packs. They are very popular in the military where I'm from, and I would love to hear your thoughts about them. Maybe even compared to your Savotta packs.
I have an old 55L backpack from Decatlon as well... It is 3.1/3.2kg (including rain cover).
It it adjustable, but not comfortable. Has many pockets, but not practical.
The loading/unloading of the pack cannot be made by the top.
I call it the suitcase backpack... But this is the only backpack I have for backpacking :c
I have been looking for an upgrade, but I don't have all the gear I need for overnight trips... So I am waiting to know what capacity I need.
The red one from Decathlon is on my future purchases list, if I ever need a backpack this size.
another great review... and that awesome ending bgm...
I have the 90 +10L version of this and I love it! I do not see my version on the website anymore
Hey, there is a new version with a wooden frame - fjall-alike. Actually it is lighter than Kajka 85. And it is around 170 USD in PL at current rate.
Decathlon is big here in Spain and I have a few bits and bobs from them. Some are good, some are just average. It's a usual pack, in my opinion. Keep up the reviews mate💪🏴
I currently see this version of the MT900 at 160$CAD, (because a newer version is out) vs the MT100 at 130$, not a huge difference in price. But The MT100 is still 800gr (nearly 2 pounds) lighter. I dont understand why the MT900 is so heavy.
Your reviews are excellent and very informative. I have purchased items based on your reviews the past. I know this maybe a tall order but have you considered doing a review on kuiu backpacks?
Would like to see that too
The Berghaus bioflex system rucksacks I've owned over the last 15 years can be adjusted while wearing them, in the same way as the Trek 100
There are a new mt900 design on the market!!!
In France (home country of Decathlon) the price is 160 euros
I have the mt500 air 50+10. The features on the forclaz are great, for the £90 I paid. You can see a slight decrease in quality when compared to an exos 58, however, at half the RRP its certainly not 50% worse than an osprey. I'm glad I have mine as a back up.
they must have heard you over at Forclaz because the MT900 series backpacks are made in 500D Cordura now
Good afternoon Luke from Syracuse NY and thank you for sharing your adventures and equipment testing
sounds to me like they only really thought about volume when it comes to inner storage. ive noticed budget items are not as compact but at the end of the day 80L of space that only handles 35lbs is highly limited in use for that pricetag . cheers for another great review
You seem to be paying a fair chunk extra in the US for this pack..It's in my local Decathlon for 160€ which is around 170$... Dear still though, but cheaper in Europe.
The Trek MT100 is only 90€ here... good deal.
Good, helpful review as always. Thanks.
Hi Mr. Luke the backpack I have 80L and I had it long time when I was Navy Airman! Now I use it go motorcycle camping! 🙃
Hi I Luke. I prefer old school ext frame packs like Super Tioga for 80 plus liter heavy loads.
Thanks bro. If both bags were about the same price, which one would you prefer? But MT 900 iş second hand. So it's used but very good condition
I have this backpack (bought it 160 euro in France) and I like so much the full front panel opening that I think it's an essential feature for a pack of this size. Anybody has suggestions of other similar backpacks with such feature? I'm looking for a tactical one but they seem heavier and this feature is often absent or much less pratical.
Very interesting, especially after your Trek 100 review. I bought one following that and concur exactly with your thoughts on it. Can't undertand why that "easyfit" system of adjustment isn't universal? I think though, Decathlon stuff is perhaps better priced in Europe? I paid about £68 for my Trek 100 70 litre, stunning value.
Thank you.
MT 900....Currently £140 in UK, 168 dollars US?
Lovely, honest and fair review as always my friend. Thanks a lot, I love your channel.
Luke, that was a fantastic review. Thanks for this one.
Thank you for your sharing and excellent review 🎉
What's your go to pack...favorite one? Love your reviews!
I have a jacket from decathlon an fixed blade knife and love them both
I concur... Love the design, made especially for larger cold weather gear
I bought this backpack 2 years ago for 140€ (150$) and im very happy with it :)
i have a gregory baltoro 75 which is in the 200 price range and I like it so far.
i had this version .. after 100k of Făgăraș ridge i return it .
the padding in the hip area crumbled ..so that suked
in the rest i was very hapy with it
Polyester doesn’t absorb water or sag/stretch when wet. That is a plus over nylon….
Mate, with all respect, Osprey Atmos AG is 2x more expensive than MT900 Symbium (yes, it's not Symbian). I agree that this Forclaz is quite heavy, but if you compare it with a similar featured backpack from Tatonka - let's take Yukon 70+10 - its weight is also 2.6 kg. Deuter Aircontact Core or X will be also 2.5-3.1 kg. So it not so dramatically differ from others. I would better say that MT900 Symbium have some design disadvantages (lack of an isolated bottom section) and some issues when heavy loaded (when about 30 kg - the back waist pad is too small and soft, so it begins to put unpleasant pressure on the lower back, and when it's wet, it rubs it). The thing I like in MT900 Symbium is shock-absorbing suspension - it works great when you need to jump from somewhere. And it looks durable as hell.
I agree 💯 outstanding job Luke.
Hey Luke, thanks for the fair review. S&H my friend…🇺🇸
Like the look of the Teton sports 65L better. Super comfortable and better pricing
He's not wrong I am one of those people who consider strapping stuff to the outside of a pack to be a cardinal sin...
Would you consider reviewing the frost river line of packs ? Would love to get your opinion?? Thanks !
The price of $210 is not worth spending on this Decathlon unit. I totally agree on your selection of Osprey's AG, one of the most comfortable backpacks I have ever used.
I have the Teton Outdoors Explorer 4000, very happy with it. This doesn't seem much of an upgrade to me. Similar size (65 vs 70), weight and materials. Obviously, the front flap is a nice feature but $210...OUCH! Got mine for like $60 or $70.
I have both packs and I've have to say that the Decathlon packs are a class above. I sold my Teton.
They're overpriced in the US. EU prices are; MT900 - 170$, MT100 - 90$
Tell us again how expensive this pack is Luke🤣 Nice review, well done of course. Different strokes for different folks they say. Strange the same company makes a more realistically usable pack, close in size and way less expensive. I don't get it but they obviously designed this by intention. Thanks for honest, fair opinions. Take care.
You did a review on the Marine Corp ILBE and I was wondering how does it compare to that one? I trust your opinion on this .
Do you know the Swedish outdoor brand Lundhags? They just released a complete new series of amazing looking backpacks. The Saruk Pro/Expedition screams for a review. I'll maybe get one for myself soon.
Don't you worry about the velcro wearing over time? Also what do you think of the Travel 100 backpack from decathlon?
the only velcro that will wear is the one on main compartment flap. But you can easily resew new one
Bought the Trek 100 as a stopgap, and it has become my favourite winter/shoulder season pack. Can't go wrong. Love Osprey (my other three packs are from them) but am so not doing the Atmos.
Good review. I will stick with my Osprey Aether 70 Ag.
Luke, I was wondering, what do you do with the things you reviewed?
$200 for a pack that will last for years, is not that much imo. Highly recommend people to try out what feels good for them, and if it's a costly one, buy it anyway. You'll be happy you did once you are on the trail!
Thank you good to know what you look for
Test the Hill People Gear UTE and Decker
I like the pullover you have on. Nice.
I bought this backpack in Germany for 159 Euro, that's totally fine for me. Last trip I loaded 25 Kg, that's limit to me but was doable over 60 km ... so far my experience
don't know why it's so expensive at your place. I not would've spent 210 € for this either. But it's very robust I need to say.
I bought mine a few years ago for $100. Back then it was called the Trek 900 70 + 10. Insane to charge $200 + for this. The shoulder straps and waste belt suck with mushy padding and abrasive mesh. The pack is made from 600 polyester. and the zipper pulls are crumbling off of mine (not really a big deal). What I like about the pack is the actual design. What I find confusing about this review is that he talks about other better packs from Forclaz; however, they have the same flimsy shoulder straps/waistbelt as the one being reviewed. ?????
Hello Luke,Excellent review.
I was looking forward to watch your opinion about this bag, especially after I saw it in Decthlon, next to the Folcraz 100.
Your review strengthen my decision back then to go with your recommendation, as my first big backpack.
Keep up with the professional, honest and concise reviews.
I have the black version of this bag and got it when it was on special for $120 USD here in Australia back in 2021 - Took it 380km across the arctic circle in the far north of Sweden at the end of last year and it held up to everything I threw at it. I rucked approx. 23kg in this thing and never did I feel uncomfortable at any point. This pack is mainly designed with long-distance cross-country skiiers and snow shoers in mind, and that is exactly who I am in those envirnments - It isn't, however, a pack that I would recommend for someone rucking through the warmer portion of the shoulder seasons and definitely not the summertime; there are far better bags for that purpose.
I'm still stuck on my massive Eberlestock Battleship pack. It too is heavy. And expensive
Right now I want to buy a backpack but Im kinda confused with so many options. Mt100 Mt 500 Mt900 and dont know exacly the pros and cons between each model.
I migbt get this Mt100 that costs 90€ but gonna study a bit more the exact differences with other bags in Decathlon
Which one you bought?
Please review Decathlon Mt500 60+10L
I am a regular user of track 100 from decathlon.. it is really very nice..
Wonder what the second pack that the title says there was. Right now, I'm thinking that the pack that was only talked about was the mistake purchase.
My load out for a weekend is about 35lbs, and using a 60L pack I still usually have a little room to spare. What on earth is the point of an 80L pack if it can't comfortably carry more weight than my 60L? What are people supposed to do with the extra 20L? Bring a full sized pillow?
Hey Luke I'm Confused.....during your review you said that the pack comes in TWO colors...
Grey and black.......the pack you Are showing is BLUE......???
If I'm carrying a 70+L pack, I better be climbing a mountain or I'm carrying too much gear. I'm way too short for things that size. Even in the Corps, I was miserable with whatever iteration of a large pack happened to be the flavor of the decade. I'll stick with the 40s and 50s and leave the luxuries at home 😂