"The Standard Model Finally Breaks Down" JWST Shatters the Core of Cosmology, Revision Starts Soon
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 พ.ค. 2024
- "The Standard Model Finally Breaks Down" JWST Shatters the Core of Cosmology, Revision Starts Soon. Over the years, we have tried several methods to measure the expansion rate of the universe.
One way is to calculate nearby observations of supernovae, and the second uses the cosmic microwave background, or radiation that flooded the Universe shortly after the Big Bang.
While observations of the cosmic microwave background radiation say the universe should be expanding today at a rate of about 67.8 kilometers per second per megaparsec, the other method says it should be expanding at 73.2 kilometers per second per megaparsec.
So the results from these two measurements differ by about 10 percent, and it has caused widespread debate among physicists and astronomers.
And if both measurements are correct, it suggests that the current scientific understanding of the universe's composition is incomplete. This is called the Crisis in Cosmology.
To solve the crisis scientists used the Hubble Telescope to measure the true rate of expansion of the universe. It, too, found that the universe is expanding at different rates in different parts. But all hell broke loose when recently scientists turned humanity’s most advanced telescope to find out about the mystery. By double-checking the Hubble Space Telescope's results, the James Webb Telescope’s observations not only complicated the paradox of Hubble Tension more, it also ruled out calculations errors.
Subscribe to take a deep dive into the unknown with Territory - / @territoryspace
Instagram - territoryspace
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @territoryspace - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
All I can say is keep up your good work of discovering the "new." It is starting to be that "the more we know, the more we don't know," as the saying goes. I actually find this enlightening. It backs up my own view that the physical universe is but a subatomic-sized dot of the infinite, and just maybe there are infinite universes. Why not? The universe's estimated 92 billion light-year cross-distance may be totally irrelevant in the end.
Expand into what exactly? And how can something infinite expanding in the first place? Are we sure, we now have the correct 'model' representing reality?
And what did Michio Kaku mean when saying his famous quote: 'However in cosmology, we're off by a factor of 10 to 120'
One thing that creates confusion is the persistence use of phrases like "infant universe" or "quicker than we thought." This pushes the hearer to assume there is a "beginning," when there may not be. The simplest explanation for really big galaxies that have undergone mergers far distant in space, is simply that they are already ancient. The estimate of "age" of the universe is either wrong, or makes the mistaken assumption that it _has_ and age, The observation that there seems to be more mass in one hemisphere of the universe than the other suggests that immense structures are present at scales cosmologists are unwilling to recognize.
Very true! The REAL beginning of “space and time” is probably so far removed from our “momentum” that it is impossible to reconstruct (in case of a cyclical self-renewal of the universe / multiverse)...
I think these ideas are a giant step towards really understanding our universe. There is a saying, 'that which is above is as that which is below'. If it applies to our universe it would apply to what we call the multiverse or even the Omniverse.
I really like your term "omniverse"; I previously called this idea of the possible external structures of our universe/multiverse the "megaverse"... 😉
Great Post all information presented very well and very interesting. Thanks
My crackpot theory is that the galaxy originated in far future, and it was inhabited by a Kardeshev type III galactic civilization. That civilization realized that their home galaxy was running out of hydrogen; so it used its control of galactic power to create a wormhole that sent that galaxy to the early universe, where it could absorb the much-denser hydrogen.
Most likely these structures as per galaxies in general are established where they are and continue to be powered by Birkeland Currents.
Hearing about the Big Ring and Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall, I can imagine how the first Astronomers who discovered Pulsars must of felt. For a brief period of time they thought Pulsars might be artificial (mind you people and even scientist tended to be a lot more optimistic back then), they imagined some sort of navigation beacons kind of like giant interstellar light houses guiding interstellar ships. Only to realize that such objects are more likely to be naturally occurring. Hearing about these large objects that don't fit well with the standard model brings to mind for me Dyson and the Fermi Paradox. If advance civilizations have ever increasing energy demands the logical end conclusion appears to be massive mega-structures to harvest energy, classic example is a Dyson sphere (more realistic a swarm of energy collectors in orbit around a star forming more of a dense cloud rather then on solid shell) which is theoretically what a type 2 civilization would build (for a sense, on that scale we aren't even type 1 yet). Theoretically type 3 civilizations would be using the entire energy output of whole a galaxy (stars, black holes, ect), the Fermi paradox comes in with if that's logical conclusion why have we not detect any such structures yet. Because especially type 3, type 4 and up civilizations are increasingly harder to hide.
Anyways fun to imagine the possibilities, however there will probably be a natural explanation to the large structures.
👍
"past its sell by date"
What does 1:3mill mean with billions of stars
No explosion is symetrical. One can see that in high speed videos of nuclear detonations. The universe cannot be a sphere.
Thank you for this! Always wondered!
well, if you look at those photos of the first test nuclear explosions, those are pretty spherical. but our universe is a sphere regardless, just because we're limited by the cosmic horizon, which is necessarily spherical. Personally I think the universe is the result of a quantum fluctuation of energy occurring in an infinitely large and eternal outer universe, which is mostly cold nothing, but large stretches of cold nothing in infinite time eventually result in extremely large energy fluctuations which can kick off the formation of matter filled bubbles of inflating spacetime
Explosions are symmetrical, it is only when an external force is applied that the distribution of mass changes. It's most likely that the explosion wasn't centered or a large amount of the atoms aren't actually directly influenced by the big bang
@@themightysalamence9870 If the universe expanded into a void then there is nothing that will help keep a sphere from evolving into something else. The first second or two of and atomic test show a sphere but before it turns into a mushroom cloud it's already breaking up. The same for the atomic test the US performed over the South Atlantic
@@FromTheHeart2 It's just my POV.
Eckpyrotic Universe Theory