@@choqao He knew what he was doing when he has "1 YEAR LATER REVIEW" in the title. It makes in sound like he's had the product for a year, which he hasn't. This is clickbait.
I tried the Vision Pro for about an hour, I didn't get any pain or marks on my face; I'd say that it's actually quite comfortable. As a long-time VR user I learned that the big reason headsets leave marks on your face is because they're just on too tight. Your forehead marks tell me that you are wearing the band too tight. the VP's strap not having a top band, it's not supposed to fully support its weight, just keep it from falling off while your cheek bones hold it up
Wrong. No. He is 100% correct. HIS REVIEW HE DID IT BEFORE IT CAME OUT FOR CONSUMERS. It was one year ago, exactly that Karl reviewed the vision pro before it was released. Pay attention!
Wrong. No. He is 100% correct. HIS REVIEW HE DID IT BEFORE IT CAME OUT FOR CONSUMERS. It was one year ago, exactly that Karl reviewed the vision pro before it was released. Pay attention!
@@Clankillashe didn’t do a review 1 year ago, he did a First look and impressions video 1 year ago where he didn’t even get to wear the thing, the first time he got to try it was 5 months ago and he didn’t even make a review video just made a short
@@soumyonath911You can read the description. A review simply means an examination. He’s examining the device 1 year after the apple event where Apple said what the headset would be able to do. Even in the video he’s comparing what Apple said to what it can do now. You just misunderstood.
Smiling while saying he spent almost $7,000 for a vr headset Me: Spent $300 on my Quest 3, doing mixed reality....... and playing awesome games. Apple Vision Pro: "sound of crickets" 😂
The first desktop computer the Xerox Alto came into existence at Xerox Parc in the early 1970s and the concept has pretty much remained the same to this day. We have obviously evolved computers into several form factors: smart phones, tablets, laptops, but the Mac and Windows computers have not stood still. The Mac Mini or a Dell Optiplex 7010 are perfect examples of the first concepts that exist to this. Exponentially way more powerful, easier to use, but they are basically the same fundamental devices that existed 50 years ago: keyboard, mouse, display, system unit. Which is exactly why I believe the Desktop Computer, while it might significantly become more of a niche will be here in 20 years and so will the smartphone. If you look even at the iPhone, compared to the original that came out in 2007, they have actually gotten bigger and heavier. As for the Vision Pro, first thing they can maybe do is lose the eye sight lenticular lens and replace it with a built in battery, switch out the aluminum for a lighter carbon fiber material using a faux pas coating. If they do anything that diminishes the software experience compared to the original, then it won't catch on. Hopefully 2 NM that will increase battery life, increase miniaturization and possiblly combine R1/R2 into the Apple silicon chip itself to further save on space and reduce weight.
Click bait title. You added you live in Canada so you have not had a year as it launches in Canada on July 12. It released in US IN FEB 2024 sooo. What the heck on the one year title. And review 2.0 before it officially out is misleading too. Yikes.
Wrong. He’s moved back to Canada and was in the states in his apartment. He has since swapped the house of his parents in Canada and his remodeling it and now his parents live in his apartment here in the states. He is a content creator and travels all of the time. So it’s been a year since he first reviewed this device with it in his hands so he is correct. He is 100% correct. HIS REVIEW HE DID IT BEFORE IT CAME OUT FOR CONSUMERS. It was one year ago, exactly that Karl reviewed the vision pro before it was released. Pay attention!
For anyone who is telling it’s only been 6 months since Vision Pro has been released, this bro is living in a different timeline and he lives 6 months ahead of us.
I would recommend the Global Cluster Headstripe CMA1 to wear the Vision Pro for longer periods of time. It‘s heavier but well balanced on your head. No need to wear a Light Seal anymore.
Not a great start. 0:51 You just said not to go any higher because you don’t need more storage on your AVP. I hope the rest of the video is qualifying that broad statement. It records 3D pix and video. Big files. It downloads movies and tv shows. It has 3D environments and objects that can be downloaded and manipulated. Big files. Some of the apps are spatial and are…big files. I’d never tell someone that cliched comment from 1995: “You’ll never need more storage than x.” Shocking naivety.
Had the vision pro a few days and i can say i was concerned by many videos about the weight in particular, thankfully i feel like its been well blown out of proportion, the AVP is very comfy to wear, i have the 21w and FOV is decent, im very happy with it so far, i would say the quality compared to the quest is defo next level and of course for the price it should be. The biggest thing for me was the spatial videos..there brought tears to my eyes..3d movies is also next level. Its expensive but this thing is pure quality
I think the title is misleading. You can't count it's announcement as meaning it's a year. It was released in February first in US. it may well be the most expensive standalone but there are more expensive PCVR headsets such as Varjo.
Wrong. No. He is 100% correct. HIS REVIEW HE DID IT BEFORE IT CAME OUT FOR CONSUMERS. It was one year ago, exactly that Karl reviewed the vision pro before it was released. Pay attention!
Canadian here picking up his AVP on Saturday. It HAS to be better than my Quest 3 or I’ll end up returning. I’m looking for clear visuals and it’s more business case use than gaming. I don’t game on my Quest so I’m hoping the purchase will be worth it.
Wrong. No. He is 100% correct. HIS REVIEW HE DID IT BEFORE IT CAME OUT FOR CONSUMERS. It was one year ago, exactly that Karl reviewed the vision pro before it was released. Pay attention!
The lack of real softwares for the device might be the reason. My experience with Quest 2 is that there are not a lot of big games for it so 128gb storage felt like it is enough
4:53 Just as a Workaround, Can't you just (with the macBook obviously and reflecting to the Vision Pro) get a few browsers open and put a different game to each one and watch a few games simultaneously?
This is of course clickbait because the product itself came out in February lol. However if you talk about the announcement then it is 1 year later. However you didn't have the product back then.
Wrong. No. He is 100% correct. HIS REVIEW HE DID IT BEFORE IT CAME OUT FOR CONSUMERS. It was one year ago, exactly that Karl reviewed the vision pro before it was released. Pay attention!
This feels like all the reviews from people who just got it, before they realized it’s not that useful. Sure the tech is cool, it’s made of nice materials, but what do you do with it? The software that would make everyone want to buy it doesn’t exist and who wants the pay Apple 30% of their total revenue for the privilege of developing software for the Vision Pro? Pass through = my eyes work great without wearing a head set. Not needing to buy monitors = a 2K display will look much sharper than a virtual monitor projected on a slightly higher display an inch from my eyes and for the money I could buy at least one very nice monitor if not two for the price. Persona = what’s wrong with a web cam? External display = the person who paid for the device never gets to see it. “Until we finally get to see like a full suite of apps” Without applications the device is pointless. Anyone who develops the app that makes the Vision Pro “a must have” with lose thirty percent to Apple for the privilege of saving the Vision Pro. That’s too high of a risk for any company to fund development for the Vision Pro. Apple will forget the fanboys who pay crazy prices for their new devices and computers. Look at how fast Apple forgot about all the people who bought modular Mac Pros that never got any additional modules. Apple will not care you spent $6600 CAD on a headset they didn’t make any useful software for. What are people expected to do with a cut down Vision Pro when there is very little the premium version can do?
Ausgezeichnet erklärt, und ja ist im Kalender eintragen 09.07.2044 😅 Bin schon seit 18 Jahren bei TH-cam denke wird 20 weitere Jahre laufen, anders aber denke wird nochj aktiv sein
People. It’s been a full year since he did the first review of this device and he was at Apple Park when he did it one year ago! th-cam.com/video/OpVP461ZHIY/w-d-xo.htmlsi=pubd6A2Ko10tGsup
Am I going to spend £3.5k on this when I can get a quest 3 for a fraction of the price that can almost do most things just as good and more besides . I mean it doesn’t even look that advanced but just like an cheap plasticky pair of goggles with a cheap strap attached to it which I can imagine getting dirty quit quickly . No I’ll buy a quest 3 and with leftover I can buy decent used 2nd hand car with the money lol
Wrong. No. He is 100% correct. HIS REVIEW HE DID IT BEFORE IT CAME OUT FOR CONSUMERS. It was one year ago, exactly that Karl reviewed the vision pro before it was released. Pay attention!
The technology is there but its not perfected enough for me to buy .. once they make it with no wires and have it in a regular glassses frame form then it will be complete .. they know this ...and im pretty sure its already made but they dont want to give it to the public yet
![[UNCUT] “อภิสิทธิ์” ครม.อุ๊งอิ๊ง แย่งเก้าอี้กันฝุ่นตลบ “ทักษิณ” บงการเอง Iคนดังนั่งเคลียร์I 21ส.ค.67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/a_b-kItw2jY/mqdefault.jpg)
The Vision Pro has only been out for 6 months? What is this video?
He meant “after being announced”
@@choqao He knew what he was doing when he has "1 YEAR LATER REVIEW" in the title. It makes in sound like he's had the product for a year, which he hasn't. This is clickbait.
these tech reviewers are so out of touch with reality.@@ChaoticHaze
He’s had it early confirmed
It was one year ago, exactly that Karl reviewed division pro before it was released. Pay attention!
why do you have a 🍆 emoji in your frequently used emojis, karl?
How u doin Karl?
How did you notice this!?
I tried the Vision Pro for about an hour, I didn't get any pain or marks on my face; I'd say that it's actually quite comfortable. As a long-time VR user I learned that the big reason headsets leave marks on your face is because they're just on too tight. Your forehead marks tell me that you are wearing the band too tight. the VP's strap not having a top band, it's not supposed to fully support its weight, just keep it from falling off while your cheek bones hold it up
This vid is definitely literally ahead of the time
1 Year - Clickbait ! Its available since THIS Year
The dude literally showed a clip of him creating a video with it a year ago. You may have not gotten your hands on it early, but he did.
If Vision Pro is out in your country, let me know what the $ conversion comes out to. $5,000 Canadian is PRICEY!
4000€ - Germany
@actualboulderour minimum wage in Ontario Canada is 16.55 an hour which is about 12.03 USD per hour
$6000 AUD
Just to clarify his video this is a full year since this is ANNOUNCED not full year of when it was available for purchase 😅
Wrong. No. He is 100% correct. HIS REVIEW HE DID IT BEFORE IT CAME OUT FOR CONSUMERS. It was one year ago, exactly that Karl reviewed the vision pro before it was released. Pay attention!
@@Clankillas 😂 announced at June WWDC last year
Interesting - thanks! Mine‘s arriving on Friday, can‘t wait!
Just because of the clickbait I’m unsubscribing, when you say 1 year later it’s 1 year after release not announced
Wrong. No. He is 100% correct. HIS REVIEW HE DID IT BEFORE IT CAME OUT FOR CONSUMERS. It was one year ago, exactly that Karl reviewed the vision pro before it was released. Pay attention!
@@Clankillashe didn’t do a review 1 year ago, he did a First look and impressions video 1 year ago where he didn’t even get to wear the thing, the first time he got to try it was 5 months ago and he didn’t even make a review video just made a short
@@soumyonath911You can read the description. A review simply means an examination. He’s examining the device 1 year after the apple event where Apple said what the headset would be able to do. Even in the video he’s comparing what Apple said to what it can do now. You just misunderstood.
super helpful, mine's arriving in a few days :)
I’m looking for virtual reality like in the movie Ready Player One. What should I get?
Apple Vision Pro
How has it been 1 year already? Feels like 2 months max
Agreed
Same
Cuz it has. Vision Pro came out in February just a couple of months ago. It was announced a year ago tho so thats that
No. He is 100% correct. It was one year ago, exactly that Karl reviewed division pro before it was released. Pay attention!
@@gabramosrodNo. He is 100% correct. It was one year ago, exactly that Karl reviewed division pro before it was released. Pay attention!
One of the best videos, explaining the Vision Pro , good job.
Sold me. I have no use for one
Smiling while saying he spent almost $7,000 for a vr headset
Me: Spent $300 on my Quest 3, doing mixed reality....... and playing awesome games.
Apple Vision Pro: "sound of crickets" 😂
The first desktop computer the Xerox Alto came into existence at Xerox Parc in the early 1970s and the concept has pretty much remained the same to this day. We have obviously evolved computers into several form factors: smart phones, tablets, laptops, but the Mac and Windows computers have not stood still. The Mac Mini or a Dell Optiplex 7010 are perfect examples of the first concepts that exist to this. Exponentially way more powerful, easier to use, but they are basically the same fundamental devices that existed 50 years ago: keyboard, mouse, display, system unit. Which is exactly why I believe the Desktop Computer, while it might significantly become more of a niche will be here in 20 years and so will the smartphone. If you look even at the iPhone, compared to the original that came out in 2007, they have actually gotten bigger and heavier. As for the Vision Pro, first thing they can maybe do is lose the eye sight lenticular lens and replace it with a built in battery, switch out the aluminum for a lighter carbon fiber material using a faux pas coating. If they do anything that diminishes the software experience compared to the original, then it won't catch on. Hopefully 2 NM that will increase battery life, increase miniaturization and possiblly combine R1/R2 into the Apple silicon chip itself to further save on space and reduce weight.
I can not wait to watch some movies on it, I skipped the most recent Avatar in theatres so this will be great
You will not be disappointed
@@Symbiotix_GamerIf you have thalassiohobia and are especially scared of whales, can you still watch the movie?
Click bait title. You added you live in Canada so you have not had a year as it launches in Canada on July 12. It released in US IN FEB 2024 sooo. What the heck on the one year title. And review 2.0 before it officially out is misleading too. Yikes.
Wrong. He’s moved back to Canada and was in the states in his apartment. He has since swapped the house of his parents in Canada and his remodeling it and now his parents live in his apartment here in the states. He is a content creator and travels all of the time. So it’s been a year since he first reviewed this device with it in his hands so he is correct. He is 100% correct. HIS REVIEW HE DID IT BEFORE IT CAME OUT FOR CONSUMERS. It was one year ago, exactly that Karl reviewed the vision pro before it was released. Pay attention!
For anyone who is telling it’s only been 6 months since Vision Pro has been released, this bro is living in a different timeline and he lives 6 months ahead of us.
And also disliked and unsubscribed for using clickbait titles
Click bait title. Unsubscribing. February 2024 to July 2024 is not 1 year.
I would recommend the Global Cluster Headstripe CMA1 to wear the Vision Pro for longer periods of time. It‘s heavier but well balanced on your head. No need to wear a Light Seal anymore.
It was never worth it 😂
Not a great start. 0:51
You just said not to go any higher because you don’t need more storage on your AVP.
I hope the rest of the video is qualifying that broad statement.
It records 3D pix and video. Big files.
It downloads movies and tv shows.
It has 3D environments and objects that can be downloaded and manipulated. Big files.
Some of the apps are spatial and are…big files.
I’d never tell someone that cliched comment from 1995: “You’ll never need more storage than x.”
Shocking naivety.
Had the vision pro a few days and i can say i was concerned by many videos about the weight in particular, thankfully i feel like its been well blown out of proportion, the AVP is very comfy to wear, i have the 21w and FOV is decent, im very happy with it so far, i would say the quality compared to the quest is defo next level and of course for the price it should be. The biggest thing for me was the spatial videos..there brought tears to my eyes..3d movies is also next level. Its expensive but this thing is pure quality
I think the title is misleading. You can't count it's announcement as meaning it's a year. It was released in February first in US. it may well be the most expensive standalone but there are more expensive PCVR headsets such as Varjo.
Bruh it came out 5 months ago
Wrong. No. He is 100% correct. HIS REVIEW HE DID IT BEFORE IT CAME OUT FOR CONSUMERS. It was one year ago, exactly that Karl reviewed the vision pro before it was released. Pay attention!
I’ll be demoing this in the Apple Store later this week. I can’t wait! 😌🙌🏾
second channel to review your gt3? and your watch collection? your omegas and rolex datejust etc! haha
Is the MacBook use specific to the the chip or the OAS running on your Mac. I had someone tell me that the AVP only works with M chips. Is that true?
I’m almost poor 😂 so I bought a pair of the Viture Pro XR glasses. I love them.
The answer is no
We want to hear more about your lovely new home your building!🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉❤
Canadian here picking up his AVP on Saturday. It HAS to be better than my Quest 3 or I’ll end up returning. I’m looking for clear visuals and it’s more business case use than gaming. I don’t game on my Quest so I’m hoping the purchase will be worth it.
Let me know if it’s worth it
Bro the device got released in February
Wrong. No. He is 100% correct. HIS REVIEW HE DID IT BEFORE IT CAME OUT FOR CONSUMERS. It was one year ago, exactly that Karl reviewed the vision pro before it was released. Pay attention!
No where close to being a year since release. Dishonest title
You mention that the 256 is enough storage fleetingly - could you elaborate please? Trying to figure out which way to go 😅
The lack of real softwares for the device might be the reason. My experience with Quest 2 is that there are not a lot of big games for it so 128gb storage felt like it is enough
4:53 Just as a Workaround, Can't you just (with the macBook obviously and reflecting to the Vision Pro) get a few browsers open and put a different game to each one and watch a few games simultaneously?
Tell me you failed basic Math in school without telling me you failed basic Math in school.
🤣🤣🤣
He meant “after being announced”
@@ANX2 right, because “1 YEAR LATER REVIEW” is clearly talking about the announcement of the product, not the product itself 🙄 It’s clickbait
It does suck the best feature is you have to have a real computer for the spatial "computer". Would be awesome if it was just a computer itself.
People already not interact with each others so now the end of HUMANITY
This is of course clickbait because the product itself came out in February lol. However if you talk about the announcement then it is 1 year later. However you didn't have the product back then.
Wrong. No. He is 100% correct. HIS REVIEW HE DID IT BEFORE IT CAME OUT FOR CONSUMERS. It was one year ago, exactly that Karl reviewed the vision pro before it was released. Pay attention!
Bro looks slightly-Cristiano Ronaldo.
Why is your photo library just photos of yourself?
Or just use face time and that person is there real time 😂
This feels like all the reviews from people who just got it, before they realized it’s not that useful. Sure the tech is cool, it’s made of nice materials, but what do you do with it? The software that would make everyone want to buy it doesn’t exist and who wants the pay Apple 30% of their total revenue for the privilege of developing software for the Vision Pro?
Pass through = my eyes work great without wearing a head set.
Not needing to buy monitors = a 2K display will look much sharper than a virtual monitor projected on a slightly higher display an inch from my eyes and for the money I could buy at least one very nice monitor if not two for the price.
Persona = what’s wrong with a web cam?
External display = the person who paid for the device never gets to see it.
“Until we finally get to see like a full suite of apps”
Without applications the device is pointless. Anyone who develops the app that makes the Vision Pro “a must have” with lose thirty percent to Apple for the privilege of saving the Vision Pro. That’s too high of a risk for any company to fund development for the Vision Pro.
Apple will forget the fanboys who pay crazy prices for their new devices and computers. Look at how fast Apple forgot about all the people who bought modular Mac Pros that never got any additional modules. Apple will not care you spent $6600 CAD on a headset they didn’t make any useful software for.
What are people expected to do with a cut down Vision Pro when there is very little the premium version can do?
You havent tried one i can tell!
I’m getting it just because it’s cool.
1 year later, huh 🤔 Click bait. Unsubscribing.
A year? Next video...
It’s garbage
MKBHD probably have him his from a year ago
Ausgezeichnet erklärt, und ja ist im Kalender eintragen 09.07.2044 😅 Bin schon seit 18 Jahren bei TH-cam denke wird 20 weitere Jahre laufen, anders aber denke wird nochj aktiv sein
looks good on you
I just don’t really see the longevity in this, especially not for £4k
I’m definitely buying it
People. It’s been a full year since he did the first review of this device and he was at Apple Park when he did it one year ago! th-cam.com/video/OpVP461ZHIY/w-d-xo.htmlsi=pubd6A2Ko10tGsup
Am I going to spend £3.5k on this when I can get a quest 3 for a fraction of the price that can almost do most things just as good and more besides . I mean it doesn’t even look that advanced but just like an cheap plasticky pair of goggles with a cheap strap attached to it which I can imagine getting dirty quit quickly . No I’ll buy a quest 3 and with leftover I can buy decent used 2nd hand car with the money lol
Nvm
Wdym one year later?
Wrong. No. He is 100% correct. HIS REVIEW HE DID IT BEFORE IT CAME OUT FOR CONSUMERS. It was one year ago, exactly that Karl reviewed the vision pro before it was released. Pay attention!
It's silent for a year
ROFL was it ever worth it?
Oh, boy. You probably pay for subs. 🙄
aapl vision pro is joke, like apple car. apple is a joke nowadays. all they do is waste money, ours and theirs
His Vision pro is fake
THAYS FAKE
🎉🎉🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Watching this on Quest 3. AVP is 7-10 times more expensive and you cannot share easy. That's BS.
The technology is there but its not perfected enough for me to buy .. once they make it with no wires and have it in a regular glassses frame form then it will be complete .. they know this ...and im pretty sure its already made but they dont want to give it to the public yet
Complete? Where are the Vision Pro apps?
WTF are you talking about there are no wires...
❤