@@5423313 Yes, pal. I bought long time ago in the UK. Soon - out of Europe and after corona, all will be more expensive! Just invested a bit in the repair and - here we go! Nice piece of history in my hands.
A part of me prefer C41 over C52 as it use a multitrack head instead of a rotary head. Azimuth is maintained over longer period of time instead of the rotary head system which overtime misalign over the years. Most likely NAAC have to come to the rescue with rotary head systems.
@@HamtaroEL I value your explanation here. But my problem is that here both the models RX C 52 and RX C 41 were auto reverse featured, meaning both having rotary heads. So both models can get the same problem of head mis-alignment after some use. Am I right? Please reply. Thanks!
marubeni You are lucky to own all these 3 models! I wish I had them too. I got only one model which is RX C 45. Does RX C52 give the best sound here as it is more powerful? Please tell what the rated power output of RX C52 is. My set is 7.5 Watts×2 RMS. Thanks.
@@janath9118 the Rated watts does not mean anyhing....most of all the RX C series are 40 watts total output....but still all of them will sound different...Reason - Type of woofer could be different...magnet used might be different...amplifier used could be different....tweeters used could be different quality.....on paper the numbers doesnt really mean anything....
@@burjis24 No, i don't agree. The rated Watts does mean something. It gives us a normal guide to judge the sound quality of any certain stereo system. But you are right about one thing, the power output figure cannot say everything about its sound quality and I agree to that. As you said, it's sound quality also depend on the type and quality of woofers, tweeters, magnets, speaker sizes, amplifiers etc. used for it. I like to write here that although most of the RX C series are labelled as 40 Watts, they are not the correct power output figures. They are termed as P.M.P.O. (Peak Music Power Output) which are baseless, fake figures. This is a complete wrong figure. They do not give any connection or regard at all to the true and correct power output figures of R. M. S. value. The true power output of RX C45 is just 7.5 Watts (Max.) per channel according to its technical information. Also the other equally important factors here are the terms like the Impedance in ohms, T. H. D. figure, Frequency response etc. which lead to get the exactly correct figure of power output of any given stereo. These figures are missing in its technical specification list now. No audio company any longer give the actual power output figures of the portable stereos or midi hifi's they manufacture. That honesty was left behind when we reached the 1980's era and beyond. That time has passed. Anyway thank you for replying me!
RXC60 - was awesome .. felt nostalgic on seeing it here .
Thank you, I have the same feelings each time I listen to it...
Ilja le Voll VINTAGE ELECTRONICS 80s must be lucky to get it keep going still .
@@5423313 Yes, pal. I bought long time ago in the UK. Soon - out of Europe and after corona, all will be more expensive! Just invested a bit in the repair and - here we go! Nice piece of history in my hands.
@@iljalevol the international version can be found worldwide even in Japan.
Thank you, friend! 😎👍👌
National Panasonic RX-C60F sound good
RX-C60 is the best.
Thanks for your comment. I believe you. I shall compare the "brothers" PANASONIC and NATIONAL, both RXC 60 once again in the coming video.
RX-C60 makes a decent standby to cassette decks.
@@HamtaroEL Yes, only RX C60 got manual recording level controls. Sorry for late comment.
Whats the model number on the very bottom...typing error on video...is it rx c 41 or rx c47 ?
Correct is C 41. It was a type mistake…. Sorry
@@iljalevol how good is national tx c47 model any idea ?
@@burjis24 I think it is as good as 41, but I have never possessed it so far…
Panasonic rx-c60 sound good I like and also looking nice tape recorder
Thank you, friend!
How much is RXC52 in 2023?
Sorry, already sold, my friend…
world best tape recorder Rx c60f.
I guess, yes!!
like.this.
Think you, dear!
দাম কত কোথায় পাওয়া যাবে
С-41 звучит что надо!
🙏👍😎
C60 > C41 > C52
Нижний панас звучал куда убедительней...
Спасибо. Купили у меня его. Уже давно. Теперь жалею, что продал…
I own RX C52, RX C46, RX C41.......RX C52 are more powerful. Big magnets on speakers.
A part of me prefer C41 over C52 as it use a multitrack head instead of a rotary head. Azimuth is maintained over longer period of time instead of the rotary head system which overtime misalign over the years. Most likely NAAC have to come to the rescue with rotary head systems.
@@HamtaroEL I value your explanation here.
But my problem is that here both the models RX C 52 and RX C 41 were auto reverse featured, meaning both having rotary heads. So both models can get the same problem of head mis-alignment after some use. Am I right? Please reply. Thanks!
marubeni You are lucky to own all these 3 models!
I wish I had them too. I got only one model which is RX C 45.
Does RX C52 give the best sound here as it is more powerful? Please tell what the rated power output of RX C52 is. My set is 7.5 Watts×2 RMS.
Thanks.
@@janath9118 the Rated watts does not mean anyhing....most of all the RX C series are 40 watts total output....but still all of them will sound different...Reason - Type of woofer could be different...magnet used might be different...amplifier used could be different....tweeters used could be different quality.....on paper the numbers doesnt really mean anything....
@@burjis24 No, i don't agree. The rated Watts does mean something. It gives us a normal guide to judge the sound quality of any certain stereo system.
But you are right about one thing, the power output figure cannot say everything about its sound quality and I agree to that. As you said, it's sound quality also depend on the type and quality of woofers, tweeters, magnets, speaker sizes, amplifiers etc. used for it.
I like to write here that although most of the RX C series are labelled as 40 Watts, they are not the correct power output figures. They are termed as P.M.P.O. (Peak Music Power Output) which are baseless, fake figures. This is a complete wrong figure. They do not give any connection or regard at all to the true and correct power output figures of R. M. S. value. The true power output of RX C45 is just 7.5 Watts (Max.) per channel according to its technical information. Also the other equally important factors here are the terms like the Impedance in ohms, T. H. D. figure, Frequency response etc. which lead to get the exactly correct figure of power output of any given stereo. These figures are missing in its technical specification list now. No audio company any longer give the actual power output figures of the portable stereos or midi hifi's they manufacture. That honesty was left behind when we reached the 1980's era and beyond. That time has passed.
Anyway thank you for replying me!
Хороши черти от Мацушита Электрик.