You are right, but ECU problems on this model were reason for people to stay away. I know how it is, third ECU for me so far. 😢 I have no idea on what kind of drugs were those guys, when they decided to put such sensitive piece of electronics on top of the engine, engine heat and vibrarions are reason for those modules to go bad as time passes by. Repairing is not succesful most of the times, and repair shops just wont do any repairs, because module fails in very short time after repair.
there are repair shops that offer moving ECU from problematic space... At least in my country, once you move it to safer spot then no problems.@@matijadaljevec6916
@@carlocasarotto9544 selespeed, th-cam.com/video/WUNb3pGSvm8/w-d-xo.html. i know it's not start from 0. My log shows 0-100 whitin 6 sec in summer w grippy slicks. (run w street tyres: average ~7-7.2)
Given the fact that the Bravo had a 2.0 5 cylinder and developed around 155 hp and was the generation before the Stilo, the 2.4 should have easily produced 185 hp. As it was developed a few years later they could have at least got another 5 to 10 HP out of it. The 2.4 abarth should have had easily around 190hp or more. What a lump.
The 1.4 was short shifting
Auto Matic nah?
thought so. Not a good driver.
Most of these could do better with quicker shifting and shifting closer to the rev limit.
poor shifting
My friends mom had a 1.9 diesel stilo, it was the first diesel i ever drove, the torque blew my nuggin on the autobahn.
For some reason, that torque feels stronger when driving than on paper.
That 1.2 could've been a bit quicker if there wasn't such poor clutch control and short shifting...
Edit: the 1.4 is WORSE!
You're shifting like grandma hahahaha
Not his videos
Can you do the Abarth 500 range (1.4, trofeo, tourismo, comp etc)?
That 1.6 is 103 hp and 145 Nm, the 105 hp engine is only from 2006, and that is an Opel engine.
Fiat's 1.6 16V engine is really successful, also they used it in different models.
You are right, but ECU problems on this model were reason for people to stay away. I know how it is, third ECU for me so far. 😢 I have no idea on what kind of drugs were those guys, when they decided to put such sensitive piece of electronics on top of the engine, engine heat and vibrarions are reason for those modules to go bad as time passes by. Repairing is not succesful most of the times, and repair shops just wont do any repairs, because module fails in very short time after repair.
there are repair shops that offer moving ECU from problematic space... At least in my country, once you move it to safer spot then no problems.@@matijadaljevec6916
offff stilooo 😍🥰😘
Le prime 2, se non tiri a limitatore , che tempo vuoi fare .?
1.6 does 0-100 in 9-9,6s if you start without wheelspin
STILO SCHUMACHER 2.4 170HP❤❤❤
1.9jtd 88kw?
where is the 2.4 jtd?
There was not such a Stilo.
@@mareq12 marea mk1?
@@robo13vw the video is about Stilo, not Marea.
@@mareq12 I know. in stilo there is no 2.4jtd but in marea it is.
@@robo13vw you represent strange way of thinking... This video is about Stilo only. Other engines in any other cars are no matter!
My dad had fiat stilo abarth BUT with 250hp and it was doing 0-100km/h in 5,6 sec
Yeah?? What mods were done to that then? I have no 13
@@Carsonktm420 just downpipe and turbo😉
i have an abarth, in good conditions simply reach 0-100 below 6 sec :D
manual or selespeed ?
@@carlocasarotto9544 selespeed, th-cam.com/video/WUNb3pGSvm8/w-d-xo.html. i know it's not start from 0. My log shows 0-100 whitin 6 sec in summer w grippy slicks. (run w street tyres: average ~7-7.2)
Dreamer.....
So the 1.9 is the best ofc 😎
Miałem Stilo MW 1.8 16v. I zrobiłem 8,7 s
Given the fact that the Bravo had a 2.0 5 cylinder and developed around 155 hp and was the generation before the Stilo, the 2.4 should have easily produced 185 hp. As it was developed a few years later they could have at least got another 5 to 10 HP out of it. The 2.4 abarth should have had easily around 190hp or more. What a lump.
2.4 Should have 185hp... But has only 170. Some 1.6 engines had 100hp, other had 170. All natural aspirated.
Нормы экологии 😢 Конечно он мощнее. Отключите это в электронном блоке управления и увидите всю мощь.
Bro you forgot the caravan models
Oh I wish that 2.4 was a manual, the manual was so much quicker to 60/62 than the stupid sillyspeed.
Down shift was good on those boxes
1.9 150 bhp can do th 0-60 sprint in 8.3 seconds if driven properly 👍
Pretty bad launch from the Abarth.
1,4 5500rpm😢
Li prendo prima con la bicicletta
I got fiat stilo 1.9jtd originaly 115hp but pushed to 165hp , 0-100km in 7.1s
Hola!!! 165hp con solo reprogramación? Gracias!
Черепаха