BOSS GT10 v GT100 Review
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
- Head over to the Andertons website to find the products in the video! | tinyurl.com/27...
Electric Guitar Department | tinyurl.com/2a...
Acoustic Guitar Department | tinyurl.com/23...
Bass Department | tinyurl.com/24...
Guitar Pedal Department | tinyurl.com/28...
Amp Department | tinyurl.com/28...
The links below may be outdated, use the links above to start browsing the website.
👆 Find out more about the BOSS GT100 on the Andertons website at
www.andertons.c...
If you own a BOSS GT10 and wonder if its worth upgrading to the GT100 this video gives you a side by side demo of the two units and explains some of the differences.
You can get the same tone (or at least a VERY VERY similar one) with both pedals!!! Not convinced? let me tell you why you can get a very similar tone with the gt 10. In the gt 10, use the Fx-1 to create a para EQ or a graphic EQ to adjust the tone, then with Fx-2 select "tone modify" to adjust more the tone, then keep adjusting the tone with the knobs in the main screen, then press the "EQ" button in the "effects select" section and keep adjusting the tone, then go to "preamp" and you have like 4 windows where you can make changes to adjust more the tone, then go to OD/OS and make more adjustments, then select compressor to make more tone changes, then, if you are not 100% happy after all these thousand opportunities to modify your tone, click "edit" in the EZ tone section and make more adjustments. Finally, if you still need more adjustments, move the knobs of your amplifier. After all this, you should have a killer tone, if not, you're an idiot.
Looks like I won't be selling my GT 10 after all....
Likewise
Guitarist6494 2018 now seeing GT 10 for $100 range- still worth getting?
Count this chick in too. No thank you... ”GT 10 people”, uh yeah. We ”appreciate it”. ”It” being our GT 10!!!
In my own opinion and ear sensitivity, I like the sound of GT-10.
The GT-10 sounds natural compared to the GT-100 which sounds like the guitar's tone controls are turned all the way down.
vonpeedler thats true. i absolutely agree with you. the gt 100 sounds much toooo muddy!
+vonpeedler I think is for the EQ well I hope so haha.
+vonpeedler You're right, a little bit more, and you could play with a Bass Guitar
+vonpeedler You are absolutely right, tone controls turned way down. Comparison totally flawed
+Sebastian No. You can't judge the GT-100 based on this crappy demo. In actuality, the GT-10 is a lot more muddy in the Gain stages than the GT-100. I own both. And I didn't realize how muddy the GT-10 is until I got the GT-100 and tried to play some of my riffs. If you do simple AC/DC riffs, you won't notice that much difference, but once you start getting into the Van Halen (i.e, Panama) and Dream Theater style rhythm or songs where you do a lot of palm muting and single/double notes playing, you'll really notice the GT-10's lack of dynamics that just sound electronic (IMO). just my two cents.
WTF?? GT-10 is way better and clear!! GT-100is muddy as hell. Even my old vamp2 sounds better! If this comparison is meant to be GT-100 commercial, I think you fail miserably..
In this video, I think the GT 10 definitely sounds better. Interestingly, most of the comments also favor the GT 10 over the GT 100.
I've owned both the GT10 and the GT100. I still own the GT10. No matter how I tried to adjust the GT100, it always sounded more dull than the GT10. I'm a blues/rock player, no hard core metal. Still love my GT10. Also, although they are quite bright, I like the effect buttons on the GT10 since you can tell instantly which effects are on and you can easily turn them off without having to dig into a menu.
+Whodamanimal You mean the LED lights on the effects buttons? Ha, yeah I put a spot of black tape on each so they're not blinding but they're still too bright :/ A minor flaw though and I could probably do more about it.
So one guy is playing with a pick and the other is playing with his fingers on the Twin setting. What are the odds that was a contributing factor to the "warmer sound"?
yeah honestly up until the really heavy sounding models the gt 10 really stood out and the 100 sounded dark muddy and less driven
Of course they have to say the new product is better, but what the video shows is that gt10 sounds warmer and more organic IMHO
no way no way .. are you def listen again gt is really thin
I agree completely bro.
dude feels like i am on the same room with the gt 10 , and the gt 100 is been played on the next room with closed doors , lol MUDYYY
+Redbelo Do you think that is for the different EQ?
Does anyone else notice that the GT100 is being demoed with it's guitar in the NECK position and being played with his fingers? Sorry, I normally love their vids, but this is a terrible way to do it!
IM NOT FINISHED BUT UP TO THE POINT I'VE SEEN THEY HAVE BOTH BEEN USING THE SAME PICKUP AND BOTH USING A PICK
THE ONLY PART HE PLAYED ON THE NECK PICKUP WAS WHEN CAPT LEE RAN OUT OF AMP MODELS, BEFORE THAT THEY BOTH USED THE SAME PICKUP AND BOTH USED A PICK, YOU WERE JUST LOOKING FOR SOMETHING TO COMPLAIN ABOUT SO TRY AGAIN TO FIND SOMETHING WRONG, JUST GOES TO SHOW NEGATIVE PEOPLE WILL LOOK FOR SOMETHING BAD TO SAY AND CREATE SOMETHING BAD TO SAY EVEN WHEN ITS NOT THERE, SEE A SHRINK
@@MB-yw3pv Wow. Someone had a bad day. "See a shrink". LOL!
Physician, heal thyself.
GT10 is much better...
GT100 is too mild
sushieater77 In the gt 10 you can go from mild to wild.
still gt10 hands down!!!
Glad I didn't replace my GT-10 with the GT-100. The GT-10 sounds way better......not muffled and dull like the GT-100.
clinthomepc yeah, ill upgrade to strymon lol
I prefer GT 10 sound, much more organic. I have a GT10...I decided not buy the GT100
i still have the gt10. And never upgraded to the gt-100.. i did alot of review and listen on many demos and videos also i played both gt-10 and 100. But so far gt-10 is warmer
I'm liking the gt 10 the gt 100 is to dark sounding. Now hearing them live I'm sure it would be different.
No wonder there is a difference,one guy is playing with a pick,pluss when they both play with a pick,they play with different humbucker settings!!GT-10 is set to trebble and GT-100 is set to rythm on the tone switch!Bad review.
Prior to watching this video, I was going to buy the GT 100. However, in this video the GT 10 sounds better!
I've got a GT-10 and a POD HD400...the GT-10 shits all over the POD.
I plug my GT-10 straight into the PA through a DI and it sounds awesome....my band mates love it.
i still have my gt3 aahahaha
I'm still trying to master my GT 3 ;)
Gt10 is better,
I have the GT10 and listening to this, I'm so glad I do. Surely the GT100 isn't really that bad?
I have a gt-10 I've had it for about 7 years. I've often wondered why boss hadn't issued a new and improved model. When I clicked to watch this video, I was expecting just that, but after watching I'll keep my gt-10. No insults intended, the gt-100 sounds bad.
GT100 sounds like it's in a different room, bassy, wooly and dull.
I was liking the gt 10 sounds better. It all matters what type of amp you are playing a pedal through anyhow. They should show what is new about the 100 the 10 doesn't offer which they don't.
Mmm to be fair I've been looking at getting the GT 100 but after this and many more vids I've gone with the GT10 it sounds way better in my opinion to be fair!
I never liked the 100 why spoil a good thing in the GT 10 it had a better sound than the hyped 100!
Their goal is to sell the newer one, and the older one was already good enough,
I actually prefer the GT10, it may be more fizzy, but it's also more open sounding.
Really GT10 sounded better in this video.
I'm glad I'm not the only person who hears the difference.
sadtrombone.com/
I have the gt-10 and sounds incredible when the global settings eq is changed
What’s that?
On the Metallic riff I did like the GT 100 better. Otherwise the GT 10 still rocks.
gt-10 sounds better on here but i have a gt-100.....i haven't found a better pedal board yet.....
I like the GT 10 sounds better than gt100 from this comparison. The gt 100 sounds muffled. Gt 10 is crisp.
4:38 "...and this is what it sounds like." Out of tune basically. The comparison isn't really going to work unless it's the same person playing really.
A useful test would be to put a lengthy phrase in a separate looper and send it off, alternating between effects boxes using an A/B pedal.
I tried out the GT-100 at Guitar Center and while I highly recommend it for someone looking for a great floor processor I do not recommend GT-10 users upgrading to it and expecting a whole lot more than what you already have.
I have the GT-10 and my friend has the GT-100. Not really worth upgrading if you already have the GT-10 unless you use the amp modeling. The GT-10's cocked wah fizz sound on the preamp models is annoying.
Should be one guitar player and use a looper infrontof the units to make direct comparisons.
your right touch is a huge part of tone
Also most of my extraneous posts on this video are due to TH-cam's character limit. I tend to be quite obtuse with what I want to say, so I constantly have to make 2-3 posts at a time to get my point across. All I was saying is that if you're gonna compare two pedals, don't play them with two completely different guitars and guitar players - A/B them.
Cheers for the great video! I've used a GT-6, GT-8, GT-10, GT100 at various points in my gigging career and I've recently decided to downgrade from my current GT-100 back to a GT-8. I only use them for live playing and they have to be built like tanks in the venues I play! The GT-8 is way more tactile and I have a much better time adjusting things on the fly. I also can see what is happening when I'm on stage too! I can't get on with the dual GT-100 screens! But, the GT-8 sounds brighter, since getting the GT-100 my sound guy always said he struggled more with my tone! Happy with a GT-8! Must buy a spare! :D Awesome video!
Why GT8 and not GT10?
I think I like the gt 10 better just because the 100 isn't as clear
gt-100 sounds bassy and muddy in this test...gt-10 sounds better,more open
GT-100 ...massively dull and "encased" (nasal, boomy. breathless), even duller than a GT-10 which is already dull. I have the GT-8 (bought cheap from a friend 6months ago) and I can't get a decent tone out of it when I compare to my Zoom G5, which shines and kicks ass on every amp.
That's what I say bro, gt 100 sounds like if someone thrown a blanket on top of it.
I was thinking about purchasing the boss gt100 but made up my mind.
Boss gt10 sounds more natural and less digital like many say here. I might purchase a used gt10 sounds awasome, if not a line 6 pod hd500x, any suggestions my friend, I'll appreciate it.
I think the PodHD500X will piss all over the GT10. Another option is the G5n if you don't need the extra I/O on the back.
I'm very happy with my G5. You could get that one used too.
The G5n is a step back from G5. Get a G5 if you're going Zoom route.
If you have the money, Pod HD500X is way better than the Zoom, IMO.
Agree but also the Fender mustang floor have decent Fender amp tones and models compared to a boss gt 8, 10 or 100 for $175, and doesn't sound as digital just saying.
The problem with the boss ones is that takes more time to get a good tone.
I finally got something great for Jazz out of my GT8 but took a lot more time than with my Zoom G5
Gt 100 and gt 10 are soo close sounding. I picked up a used gt 10 for 200 bucks... wayy better deal than a gt100 for 400
I I bought the GT 100 And I prefer the GT 10 I love the age the 100 seems like there's a blanket covered over the speaker I hated!!
I don't know if it's just me but the boss gt10 sounds more organic, and the gt100 more bassy like if someone throw a blanket on top of it, and also sounds more digital or fake.
I like the gt 10 sounds better, it sounds more natural, and I was thinking about purchasing a boss gt100??
Boss gt 10 for me, too bad it wasn't made on black colour better IMO, but hands down, it sounds better.
The gt 10 have the jc-120 pre amp in it
The drive on the 100 sounds muddy by comparison to the 10
The GT-100 seems to have a deeper/bass tone in this demo, but that could be an EQ mismatch or mic settings between the two usnits. Hard to be objective on this demo with out being able to verify settings across units.
Id' prefer the GT-10, much brighter and you can hear it. GT-100 is too muffled.
In my view the main differences are related to guittar players capabilities 😄
Funny they said on the video that Captain ran out of preamps, but actually what would happen is the GT100 would run out first. GT-10 has 41 pre-amps, including the custom one. While GT-100 has 28.
I can't say over the quality bit, but in quantity, GT-10 is superior.
Since this video The GT 100 has a free version 2 software update that sounds a lot better and has a few new effects and a new amp model. Check the Boss website or check for a video on TH-cam.
Same thoughts. I've got GT-10 and based on this video I will not be updating my gear.
Now I know I a can buy old and cheeper GT10. It is much better....
i'll wait for the GT1000
did you buy it? :D its out now. im thinking of replacing my GT10 now
podoz and dropping our dentures in a cup... Lol 😆
2 questions please!!!! 1) you speak about checking the preamps on gt10, so that means you have the out connected to the normal input of the amplifier?? or o the fx return??? a computer? (give me some advice please! my amplifier Fender Ultimate chorus sounds so dark with gt10).
2) this video doesnt show probably a fair difference, gt100 sounds worse. But, Can somebody who has had both pedalboads give me an opinion? I heard that gt100 is a better product and sounds with a bit better quality.
GT 10 sounds better on video. I think the different player styles have allot to do with the variance in tones. I hope I didn't make a mistake by going with the 100 over the 10. My 100 comes in tomorrow!
VIENDO ESTA COMPARACION ME QUEDO CON EL GT10 JEJEJEJE
I bought GT-10 when it came out, it was amazing,!
This is not a fair comparison because you have to run modelers through a 2-way speaker system so they realize their fullest fidelity. Running them into the front of an amp or through the amps effect loop is the worst and should never be done.
i will be sticking to my GT10 thanks for the demo tho lol
It's called Spotlight by a band called Majesty featuring our very own Customer Service Manager! Can't post links on TH-cam comments but you can google them or better still search for them on facebook. Cheers - Mark
mmmm, gt10.... but i like gt8
As an owner of everything Roland and Boss, here is my take: The ME=50 sounds better than the ME-70. The GT=8 sounds better than the GT-10 which sounds better overall than the GT-100. There is a pattern here. On each new item, Boss adds more features and presets, but is losing the pure tonality of sound. Check out the older units and see.
Mean gt8 is the best?
THE BEST MODELING PRODUCT NOT INCLUDING THE KEMPERS AND AXE FX IS STILL THE PEAVEY VYPYR TUBE 60, IT WAS MADE 9 YEARS AGO AND STILL NOTHING BEATS IT, HAS ALL THE EFFECTS YOU WOULD NEED AND USES THE SAME PROCESSING POWER AS THE ATOMIC AMPLIFIER, COMPARED TO THE VYPYR THESE SOUND LIKE A LINE 6 POCKET POD OR SPIDER 1
Yep, and by the time every GT 10 owner has switched to a GT 100 there'll be a GT 200 or GT 1000 on the market.
if they would just keep the frame of gt10 and improve features and not touch anything they nailed we would all be very happy
Spring of 2018...and the GT-1000 is here. $999USD, and similar complaints...
you are very right. they have introduced another gt.….. most expensive! let me buy a piece of land instead
How can U fast level all volumes attached to a group of patches?
this was nothing more than a look at me I can play van halen video. you diddent even show the unit or its interface no info what so ever! sad.
The GT-10 is by no means difficult to edit especially when using it in manual mode. I do it all the time and it takes mere seconds.
Gt 10 all the way man!!
gt 100 sounds better and easier to edit i have both..gt 100 has the best upgrade ever
i choose GT100 Cuz it has extra "0" LOL
I'M WRITING THIS FOR THOSE WHO ARE NOT SURE IF THE GT-100 IS BETTER!Got the GT-100 last week to upgrade my GT-10Just like you I was like... maybe it'll be not as good as you would expect. On the day when my package arrived I played my Gt-10 for like 4 hours or something before actually getting that gratifying door bell signaling the arrival of my new toy. I did that so I would see if there was indeed a difference or not. Got it.. plugged my headphones in and first impression was the following, this is what the GT-100 had over the GT-10-The sound was warmer all around.-It had way more expressivity, it responded really well to my playing(Stuff that would just sound meh, sounded amazing even though I was playing the same way on the same settings all through-out)-The sound wasn't.. let's call it linear.. it had depth to it, you could really feel those high gain/distortion sounds, it sounds huge!-First distortion effect I tried kinda blew my mind, after hitting an A chord really digging into the strings I went "Wow" just kinda out of reflex really, it just came out.So on to other stuff, completely clean... the GT-10 was in my opinion lacking. I could never get a satisfying clean tot like I could get on a real amp. The GT-100 however I managed to get a pretty good clean tone that I can use and it sounds awesome! Driven/Distortion/OD all that kind of stuff.. whole different story, effects wise I don't care how the GT-10 sounds hands down it has way better effects in this regard. For real. Again all my lead/rock stuff sound like they took steroids compared to the GT-10. In the mix.. my sound guy immediately told me that it sounds better even without EQ-ing it himself or anything at all. (I mean a real sound engineer with a diploma and everything not a guy at a bar doing sound cuz he loves knobs lol)Roland and BOSS are not stupid. The unit itself is better. If you get into your own effects and not use the presets(Which honestly mostly just show off the different sounds you can get with the unit) You'll love this. But you need to know how to EQ an amp and so on otherwise it'll sound like a potato. You gotta know what your doing with it, it doesn't have 3 knobs like most analog pedals or whatever. Honestly I dunno what happened in this video but yes, it does sound like the GT-10 is "Cleaner" but being next to both of them and hearing them through the clean channel of an amp or through a PA there's no way you can say the GT-10 sounds better. I don't see how you could say that.Bear in mind that: we all hear music differently. But as a whole effects, general sound, feel to the guitar and how you get sounds out of it... the GT-100 won me over. I've been using the GT-10 for 9 months or so and in the end it got stale cuz something was missing. It sounded good at first but then you start noticing those subtle nuances that are missing and the fact that your dynamic in actually playing the guitar is poorly received and it sounds stale.. Then again maybe you'll enjoy the GT-10 it's not bad effects unit. But it's lacking behind on a few things. Also depends on the type of music you play.GT-100 does what they say. It feels more like a real amp.. even though it doesn't like a real amp and maybe sounds different it has a bunch of good amp models that you can work with and actually feel. I'm all about good tones and the GT-100 let's me get those, I don't care that it doesn't sound just like a real marshal or whatever. If it sounds killer and I get a tone to melt some faces out of it I'm good to go bro!Listen to the first clean twin setting they use. Just a clean channel. And you'll hear the difference in how the GT-10 and GT-100 are different. For that patch the GT-100 actually sounds brighter and you can feel the low end better, where as the GT-10 kind of just sounds more "stale" I guess, dunno how to describe it. For the rest of the video you can hear that the GT-10 sounds like it's emulating that dynamic more then it's throwing it out there for you to like feel it. While the GT-100 I can actually feel the guitar in my headsets. Also guys.. You have tons on EQ options to get that bright tone your looking for, I mean tons... you can EQ your EQ while your EQ-ing your EQ, not to mention your sound guy which will also be EQ-ing you.Playing them both I have to say I prefer the GT-100. Maybe your not an experienced musician and the GT-10 sounds better... well yeah I guess it does in this video but if you setup your GT-100 it won't sound better than the GT-10 and in the long run when you get some skills you'll prefer the GT-100, you can be sure of that. If you wanna see a demo to this unit that kind of shows more of what it can sound like youtube "BOSS GT-100 Demo by Jack Thammarat" I hope this help. I'd say go and get this unit because it's worth it. Been playing guitar non stop since I got this, feels great!
+memil32 Yep. Completely agree with you, buddy. Couldn't have said it any better.
WOW IS THERE A CLIFF NOTES VERSION? I DONT WANT TO SPEND 2 DAYS READING THIS
OMG, the GT-100 sounds terrible, at least through the interface... Oh, and, nice hands-free playing @10:56 :D
Neither sound that inspiring. Maybe a super strat type guitar would have produced a more dynamic set of sounds. Les Pauls always sound dull and woolly to my ears.
Not a big fan of either, but enjoyed the playing!! Good stuff
I actually liked the GT 10 best in this comparo. Maybe I’m the only one.
Change the display mode on the GT-10 to get more preamp models. When you're on the default display mode (where they show you knobs and whatnot instead of parameters) they don't show you all the preamp models !
Gt 10 definitely sounds more natural!
It depends whose hands GT-100 and the sound of the guitar itself!
BOSS GT-100 Demo by Jack Thammarat
Complaining about the difference in guitars is minimal, this is going into a DSP unit which is pretty much going to color the original tone of the guitar that you would hear through a traditional tube amp. Also saying it sound like shit, well no offense to any of the manufacturers making multifx boards but yeah its crappy compared to the original thing but its really hard to get similar amount of amps and effects for anywhere near the price. Multifx boards certainly have there place.
I'm VERY disappointed with the GT100 it's NOT any better sounding than my Gt10. It's going back to the store. These guy just wan to make a sale! I tried the HD 500, the distorted, crunch and Stack models sounded good and punchy but the clean sounds were very wimpy and lacked punch. Plus the EQ's on the HD500 lack more frequencies, I'm very picky about my tone. Looks like I'll have to stick with my GT10. To bad, I was hope to hear some improvements in the over drive amps
which ok one has 57 classics and the other has burstbuckers....so what? lol
I got a GT-10 and do think i'll be upgrading to the GT-100....that said, I do think some sounds were better whilst others weren't. I dont see though swapping my AC30 and pedalboard for the GT-100 in my band. But for home play/practice and recording DI'd late at night as I sometimes like to do these GT's and similar devices Pods etc are great for that.
HD500 vs GT-100 i'd love to hear a direct comparison of those!
That said I totally agree that the amp modelling is crap on pretty much every multi-fx. Solution? Don't use it - 4CM through your nice tube amp's preamp instead and just use the MFX for effects... it's called a multi-fx and not a multi-amp-replacement-fx ;P The only exception being the AxeFX stuff... but unless you're a professional you don't NEED that and your audience will never hear the difference :P
Also, the guy playing the GT100 is playing with fingers, the other guy is playing with a pick (at least at 5:05). I didn't bother watching the rest because it's a waste of time if you're playing with essentially two different guitars, two entirely different playing styles (one of which NATURALLY sounds warmer and softer)... hell, I wouldn't be surprised if they had two different recording paths too. What nonsense - a useless, unscientific waste of time.
Nice try, but to do a versus comparison correctly: Use one player with a looper and A/B the pedals. Two people do not pick or have the same nuances. There is no way the 100 sounds better than the 10 in your video. Maybe to you there at the time, not here. Also, having a more powerful processor does not always make for a better sound. The interface is nicer though...
Its set the same. set the same. Its the same. And we set this one the same. This is set the same. The same! the pach is the same. the same amp. the same on the doo daa amd wobly bits the same. gibson the same. Repeat 500 times
OK IM FUKING THICK AS A FUKING PLANK OF WOOD. SO TELL ME! WAS IT THE SAME?
It's like comparing a Tube amp played with a Squier Strat through a DS-1 with a solid state amp of equivalent level played with a Gibson LP through a Nobels ODR-1 and saying solid state wins every time. That would also be a useless unscientific waste of time - but I guess you'd be buying that SS amp in that situation, right?
... there's nothing high about my standards. I just think that it should be a fair test, since they're quite obviously just trying to sell the GT-100. It's really not that much of an improvement over the GT-10. And my 7 posts were in response to someone else. It's a free country, I can post as much as I like on whatever topic I like and you can't stop me :)
if you had a a nice valve amp in the first place there is no need for one of these, they sound terrible through anything, spend the extra cost, get the analogue pedals they are failing to emulate. the only excuse for not being able to afford the real thing is lack of patience to save up if you don't have the spare cash.
What this means is that I'm not sure that this video is showing the TRUE quality of the new 100. I would assume it sounds better than my 10, and it is deeper, fuller, and a little more organic than my 10. Now if you add a little distortion to the 100's presets, THEN you might see the difference between the 100 and 10. The 10 just sounds a little brighter, trebley and distorted, like 5 percent more distortion is added. But the 100 sounds like a better original sound. I'll try other comparisons...
Really? almost every one of the amp models they said were exclusive to the GT-100 were also on the GT-10. Geez guys learn how to use equipment before demoing as it normally helps. Also if you're going to say you are both using the same guitar then you should Actually Use The Same Guitar!! Your trying to sell to musicians here not noobs who think if two guitars LOOK the same they SOUND the same. Boss is a good name but your not gonna sell any that way. Just sayin...
This video is nice , but ultimately falls short. On the "Clean Twin" (first comparison), the guy on the left is using a pick, while the guy on the right, inexplicably put his pick down, and uses his fingers, Naturally less clarity & punch plus a "more organic" sound.
I have a 100, and I must say, and this video shows what I have found out for myself.... must of the programs sound like they are UNDER A BLANKET!!!!!!!!!! There are a few exceptions, but not many.... this vid ded not sell the 100 very well.... ooopppps.... sorry but I have one and i know!!
There's no point in the comparison if u use the tones provided by Boss, cause they are different for sure as the sound they produce. These devices are made for deep tweak by the user, you have a programmable DSP not a kit of static effects. Anyway... no xlr out for GT100? GT-10B has it
This is not a good comparison. The guitars are very different.
On the Left: Les Paul Traditional - Weight relieved, Classic 57s pups, heavier, better tone, dark and creamy, 300k pots.
On the right: Les Paul Standard - Chambered, Burstbucker Pros, lighter, worse tone, harsh, 500k pots.