REVEALED: INSIDE NEW AIR FORCE ONE That Flies at 5 Times Speed of Sound

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 พ.ย. 2023
  • Discover the groundbreaking advancements of the new Air Force One in our latest video! We delve deep into the remarkable transformation of the iconic presidential aircraft, Boeing's 747-8, showcasing its ultra-modern design, enhanced security features, and unprecedented speed capabilities.
    **𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗤𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀, 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀, 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀, 𝗦𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗼𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽, 𝗔𝗱𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝗔𝗻𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗼:
    𝗡𝗮𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗬𝗧@𝗴𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗹.𝗰𝗼𝗺
    Nauctis is the ultimate hub for maritime, technology, transportation, and military enthusiasts.
    We release new videos every day on our TH-cam channel, Don't miss out on any of our updates - subscribe to our channel and Follow our Social Media to explore additional content.
    We request you to maintain a respectful and constructive tone in the comments section. Any spam, insults, or trolling will not be tolerated and will be promptly deleted. Join us on our journey to discover the wonders of the sea, Technology, Transportation and Military!
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 404

  • @davidmccartney3433
    @davidmccartney3433 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +242

    NOT ONE WORD about a supersonic Airforce One. I really hate these TH-camrs that have grossly misleading titles.

    • @101bennyc
      @101bennyc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      So much click bait, I’m blocking this channel

    • @jefife750
      @jefife750 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      I knew it when I saw the title. I scrolled it quickly and dumped it in less than 20 seconds. I hate this about TH-cam. Whats the purpose? This violates my community standards! BANNED!

    • @overlord5580
      @overlord5580 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      False and misleading

    • @gtbproductions1
      @gtbproductions1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      THATS WHY I GAVE HIM A THUMBS DOWN 👎

    • @ME-bw3rl
      @ME-bw3rl 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      grounds for murder

  • @orlandocabrera2107
    @orlandocabrera2107 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    Way too many inaccuracies in this video to count.

    • @wstowe747
      @wstowe747 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You are absolutely right.
      I have 31 years flying and another 5 years teaching it.
      Speed increased 5 times !?!
      Laughable…. how does this stuff get out there?

    • @user-vu9ry2fm2q
      @user-vu9ry2fm2q 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      At 9 minutes, he is talking about FDR while showing a picture of Gerald Ford.

    • @larrybe2900
      @larrybe2900 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@user-vu9ry2fm2q
      And couldn't find a photo of Nixon either.

  • @jerrycallender-qm7zr
    @jerrycallender-qm7zr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Mrs. Kennedy's color scheme is STILL an elegant design.

    • @itgoestoeleven
      @itgoestoeleven 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Mrs. Kennedy persueded her friend, Raymond Lowey, to design the livery for the Boeing 707 that was used to transport the president.

    • @jerrycallender-qm7zr
      @jerrycallender-qm7zr 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@itgoestoeleven ...as mentioned above.

  • @michaelkoscec4113
    @michaelkoscec4113 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Totally agree regarding bogus headlines that have nothing to do with the actual content.

  • @arleighj7053
    @arleighj7053 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    You would think that refueling in the air would be a MUST in case of emergency

  • @zxatl2003
    @zxatl2003 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    Do you proofread these videos before uploading them? I think NOT ! You said the engines would cost 22 Billion dollars ??? The total for both jets is suggested to possibly run up to $5 Billion. I think you meant to say 22 Million. You also said the jet would be able to go up to 5 times faster. The air frame of the 747 will not support that kind of speed. I am not a expert but for me to notice such glaring errors on your part is just ridiculous! Read your material before posting!

    • @amurtigress_mobile365
      @amurtigress_mobile365 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Not much, if any, technical research is done here in this channel. A supersonic jet would most likely need to be a delta wing or similar, who would seriously rip apart a 747 for that? That's almost as good as a newly developed aircraft....and then piece it together with previously untested new parts for something as demanding and challenging as a president's airplane? And all of that with a fuselage never meant for supersonic flight. GOOD JOKE....

    • @jeffscott6656
      @jeffscott6656 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The picture looks like a modified L1011

    • @timvaldez6537
      @timvaldez6537 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They don't even proof their historical photos.

  • @exposingthedarknesswiththe9190
    @exposingthedarknesswiththe9190 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    It's Unconscable not to have the ability to refuel in mid air! It's imperative to give Airforce One the ability to fly longer and further than any other private jet, it's simply common sense, and the ability to refuel as needed!!👍👍👍

    • @oldchuckie1874
      @oldchuckie1874 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The third AF one, the doomsday aircraft does have that feature. I’ve seen it at then Patrick AFB

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I worked at Boeing and it definitely can be refueled in flight! Why do you think that a refueling station flys in conjunction with AF1? Not only do they have these capabilities there is a cargo carrier that lands before the president does wherever he is going. It carries a limo, a Marine 1 copter, refueling stations for these additional transports, parts, mechanics, and other equipment and supplies. As well as multiple jets that fly at different compass points and varying altitudes from AF1.

    • @LikeSpee
      @LikeSpee 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Unconscable huh 🤔Did you make that up on the fly 😂

    • @BobbyTucker
      @BobbyTucker 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@LikeSpee,
      You beat me to it, @LikeSpee, It's funny how some people when trying to use 2 dollar words, they only use 1 dollar and twenty five cents in letters. Thanks, B.T.

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BobbyTucker now guys, Apple’s spell correction can pick what word they want to use and the spelling at any time. I had an excellent English and Grammar teacher that was so good that I have to recheck everything I’ve typed before hitting send. All because Mrs Lowe tried to instill it in all of her students brains so that we wouldn’t sound like illiterate hillbillies. It certainly has stuck with me for well over 6 decades.

  • @slobodanfemic4481
    @slobodanfemic4481 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    B-747 beautiful plane ever !

  • @janetceniza8091
    @janetceniza8091 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    My son is lead Engr. for Boeing out of Portland, Oregon and his group is working on one part of this huge plane.
    No info given to mom but still proud of his work.

    • @jeffscott6656
      @jeffscott6656 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😢

    • @LikeSpee
      @LikeSpee 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I hate to break this to you janet, but he's really a drug trafficker. Its hard to get out...

    • @paulfiore7083
      @paulfiore7083 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Please tell him to check the bolts

    • @janetceniza8091
      @janetceniza8091 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      His job is quality control on the parts, works on the computer only as lead Engr. Only blisters on his finger tips.@@paulfiore7083

    • @brentbarnhart5827
      @brentbarnhart5827 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Congratulations Janet, that is quite something to be proud of. (I am an engineer, albeit, not an aircraft engineer.)

  • @davescott7669
    @davescott7669 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    The plane is only "air force one" when the President is on board

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes and did you also know that there are not just two AF1’s? Speaking in terms of how they are outfitted technically yes, with all of the upgrades in security and updates in the interior layout there are only two planes manufactured and in perfect flying condition designated for the president’s use.
      Though any of the numerous airplanes that are in the Air Force’s flight arsenal have the call sign Air Force 1 when the president is on board.

  • @dustinchase9187
    @dustinchase9187 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    The title is a lie. Lies get thumbs down.

  • @Wayne-gb5pu
    @Wayne-gb5pu 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    My Man,, When You Say The Colors Of Our Flag,, Never Say,, WHITE RED BLUE... IT'S. """RED WHITE BLUE """...YOU GOT THAT...PAL!!!

    • @johnlicht9151
      @johnlicht9151 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Shifty Convict Clown 🤡 speech.

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Amen! Red is always on top!

    • @davidlauder-qi5zv
      @davidlauder-qi5zv 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      And the colours of the British flag are also red, white and blue. You got that, pal?

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@davidlauder-qi5zv 👏🏼

    • @davidlauder-qi5zv
      @davidlauder-qi5zv 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@ebnolan3856 Meaning you didn't know?

  • @Cazador60140
    @Cazador60140 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    A plane that size and structure could never fly at 5 times the speed of sound , even at high altitude it would simply diintegrate unless it only flies in Unicornalnd

    • @mikelee7318
      @mikelee7318 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      What I was thinking. No way it can fly that fast.

    • @tscotom
      @tscotom 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      clickbait !

    • @Eclipse-ss7ko
      @Eclipse-ss7ko 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think that the narrator said 5 X the old plane. No inflight refueling is BS I do not know how the air force could allow that.

    • @trains4one
      @trains4one 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You want Mach 5, the aircraft would have to look like an oversized SR-71, Especially if your carrying the normal complement of people and extra news reporters that get to tag along.

    • @jaydee4009
      @jaydee4009 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I bet it won't even go 4 times the speed of sound!

  • @kyosanim9581
    @kyosanim9581 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    AtA refueling seems very significant to omit!

  • @jaydee4009
    @jaydee4009 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Seems to me that when you're designing an improved (supposedly) Air Force One from the bottom up, you wouldn't leave out the air-to-air refueling feature, which seems like it could be a valuable feature to have when it might be needed. I mean, how hard could it have been to have included that capability in the initial design?

    • @charlescarmichael1124
      @charlescarmichael1124 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Apparently according to BETTER videos, it is pretty difficult to retrofit the 800's and they apparently have never used it. Even on 9/11.

    • @larrybe2900
      @larrybe2900 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@charlescarmichael1124
      Perhaps but we never anticipated what happened that day either so what will happen next we never anticipated? We don't know what we don't know and to spend all this money leaving the president to a game of chance it stupid.

  • @michaelcolley1324
    @michaelcolley1324 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    The new AF1 is only going to cost 5.3 billion dollars, but the generator upgrade is 22 billion. Don't you mean 22 million, and not billion?

    • @michaelloder6159
      @michaelloder6159 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Bunch of BS No Generator cost 22 million dollars .. maybe $200,000 at the most!! For a generator!!

    • @BobbyTucker
      @BobbyTucker 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The narrator stated the four engines cost 22 Billion dollars, I believe four jet engines for the aircraft can cost 22 million bucks, plus tips & gratuities...

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The narrator or the writer of the script for this video has embellished obviously. Though not by a whole lot. I believe that the script probably read close to 2 billion, not 22. Each VC 25 engine that GE will provide for the two new presidential aircraft’s are a cost of almost 325 million each. This would put the cost of the engines alone at 1.4 billion by today’s prices. If anything extra or improvements are required then this could push the cost very close to 2 billion.
      The balance of the cost for each aircraft, that will be manufactured to update and upgrade each to the specifications that are required to make it a presidential signified flying Oval Office, can be seen on the Boeing website.
      There are many technologies that are designed for these airplanes alone. So Boeing can not just take an already manufactured jet and upgrade it to meet the specifications for what is designated as a plane used by the president on a regular basis.
      It would cost much more to re-engineer a plane, by removing pretty much the guts of the previously manufactured aircraft. It takes a lot of classified, & patented technology as well as specialized components to be used in a military jet of this design.

  • @stuuuporman
    @stuuuporman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I like the current paint job. Looks Presidential, but understated. No need for red. However, I am wondering about no air to air refueling.

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There is a need for red our flag is Red, White and Blue. Not white, blue and red. The red on the new plane is understated but very impressive. There is very little red color on the new planes. But like butt holes we all have our preferences.

  • @butchs6099
    @butchs6099 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    JRB needs a wheel chair ramp but at this stage of the game maybe just shove him out and before it lands.

    • @BobbyTucker
      @BobbyTucker 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ROTFLMAO!!! Go fer' it!

    • @perryfarmer3280
      @perryfarmer3280 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      There is one bozo every day and today you are the one.

  • @marvinisit
    @marvinisit 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Just a simple FYI....lol Technically, “Air Force One” is used to designate any Air Force aircraft carrying the President.

    • @stuuuporman
      @stuuuporman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      at the moment

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You’re right! Any of the 300+ jets that the Air Force has can be a presidential plane when pressed to get him in the air and out of danger. Unless it’s a helicopter, then it’s Marine 1.

    • @BobbyTucker
      @BobbyTucker 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ebnolan3856,
      There is an SR-71 that can handle two human beings also.

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks@@BobbyTucker. Wonder if there is talk of manufacturing one to a smaller scale that could work as a glider upon deployment then convert to a jet engine as an escape pod? I know it gets weirder as we talk about what’s possible.

  • @carlmassey8837
    @carlmassey8837 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Just wondering if that elevator and wheelchair is meant for JB..

  • @PedroG-xh6lh
    @PedroG-xh6lh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I'm sorry Mr. But I still don't see supersonic mentioned anywhere in the advertisement of this video, maybe you should use your nomenclature better next time,..... I'm just saying 🙏🤟

  • @gjurczyc
    @gjurczyc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Great plane but as someone said already impossible to fly 5X the speed of sound.

    • @2hcobda2
      @2hcobda2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Mach 5
      Hypersonic
      Faster than SR-71
      Fireball XL5 can attain Solar escape velocity with interstellar range --
      must be F.T.L., which means "Back to the Future" capability

  • @CoolDave-tc7hb
    @CoolDave-tc7hb 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I like the new Air Force One is really Cool. 😎 I’m not sure 🤔 why nobody like the new Air Force One plane. It’s more like a presidential aircraft.

  • @jackmeriustacktheritrix1114
    @jackmeriustacktheritrix1114 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hypersonic 747 that would be some feat 😂😂😂😂

  • @paulfiore7083
    @paulfiore7083 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Unbelievable. I thought we didn't want a King anymore? When it's not your money it's so easy to get extravagant

  • @timothylaws4549
    @timothylaws4549 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    inside looks like Star Trek

  • @mohammedali808
    @mohammedali808 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    This is a very worrying situation where it CANNOT BE REFUELLED IN MID AIR. This a DOWNGRADE.

  • @timvaldez6537
    @timvaldez6537 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hey Nauctis, Why are you showing a photo of Gerald Ford and some reporter when you state immediately prior that Franklin D. Roosevelt was the first president to use Airforce one??? That makes no sense. You should have shown a photo of Roosevelt.

  • @brandonspaulding8097
    @brandonspaulding8097 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Everything on the internet is 100% true man! EVERYTHING! Even information about top secret airplanes man!

  • @klassyedward9718
    @klassyedward9718 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow, Super aircraft.

  • @jamesroe4968
    @jamesroe4968 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Make sure to brief Harrison Ford, you know, just in case.😂

  • @curtc4918
    @curtc4918 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    22 billion for the engines? Don't think so.

  • @TKO67
    @TKO67 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    would love to get a tour one day

  • @user-lt3pj7bc8f
    @user-lt3pj7bc8f 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Now that is how the Prez is suppose to fly

  • @oxcart4172
    @oxcart4172 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Imagine the cost if they were new! Suppliers to the American government seem to get prices out their arses knowing that whatever they come up with, it'll be paid! (Much like the makers of this video with their "facts!"

  • @Jaystarzgaming
    @Jaystarzgaming 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If stuff becomes reality no one has any right to refuse it’s existence.

  • @davedunn4285
    @davedunn4285 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I love how Donald Trump is updating the color scheme a reflection of JFK
    God Bless America

  • @gtbproductions1
    @gtbproductions1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    $22 BILLION DOLLAR ENGINES???😂😂😂

    • @2hcobda2
      @2hcobda2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But no $1K "turlet" seats, because gold plating costs more than that

  • @forestsantos9828
    @forestsantos9828 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Some of the Declassified info about the current AF1, it currently has mid air refueling capabilities, there are defensive capabilities (they won't disclose what those capabilities are, but it has some) and is nuclear strike proof. Also NO atmospheric aircraft has Mach 5 capabilities yet, even the SR71 has a record speed of Mach 3.4

  • @Sauce-Money19
    @Sauce-Money19 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Gonna Need It😂

  • @RWGish
    @RWGish 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    If they're wrong about the plane being able to fly at an impossible 3500+ mph then they're likely wrong about many other things, like airborne refueling.
    The new Air Force One may not even be a Boeing. I hear Airbus can build a jet that doesn't have pieces fall off at 20,000 ft.

  • @ronniepowell3000
    @ronniepowell3000 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You showed a picture of Gerald R. Ford when talking about 1st president to fly on Air Force 1 was FDR.

  • @timvaldez6537
    @timvaldez6537 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The second time you mention President Eisenhower you show a photo from October 16, 1958 - First Lady Mamie Eisenhower and Pan Am Chairman Juan Trippe. The Boeing 707-121, the plane that inaugurated the commercial jet age for the United States with its flight from New York to Paris. President Eisenhower is not in the photo.

  • @themister3865
    @themister3865 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why will not include the air-to-air refueling capability? I would think that function would be a given.

  • @buntoonraksapao9554
    @buntoonraksapao9554 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Put two more engines on the wings. Make it seven engines model.

  • @dalesaylors9251
    @dalesaylors9251 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The damn ring looks like a fighter jet.

  • @raymondharris900
    @raymondharris900 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    How is possible for the engines to cost 22 billion dollars, meanwhile the estimated price of the entire aircraft could possibly cost approximately 5 billion dollars?

  • @falconquest2068
    @falconquest2068 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Does this employ the anti-door fall off technology?

  • @timstewart9026
    @timstewart9026 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Given recent events, does Boeing guaranty the doors and wheels will stay on?

  • @baron2323
    @baron2323 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    on the 4:minute 55 sec said that the engines will cost 22 billion WTF..how much the entire plane will cost then?

  • @johnwoodall3791
    @johnwoodall3791 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just when i thought i have seen everything.
    Nice Video.

  • @MrJ-dc3yz
    @MrJ-dc3yz 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Can't refuel? Will the doors stay on?

  • @metubyaj7675
    @metubyaj7675 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It is important to have intercept missiles with the air plane in case enemy launches missile to the plane.

  • @d.powers3428
    @d.powers3428 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Well, it definitely looks like something presidential. Or at least suitable for a dictator for a day.😅

  • @safetychuck2
    @safetychuck2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I bet it would be 5 times as expensive as any Air Force One before too.

  • @topgunavaition
    @topgunavaition 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I know later in the future there’s going to be a supersonic Air Force 1 because the future is coming!!!

    • @johnfranklin5277
      @johnfranklin5277 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dont be so sure. I was 10 in 1969 when we put men on the moon. I remember thinking surly I would be abe to go in 20 or 30 more years......never happened.

  • @randolphgarcia3494
    @randolphgarcia3494 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    BRIEF BLOG: AS OF 3/26/2024, THE NEW AF-One is still being built at a few AF Presidential sites, one of which is in Texas. It is said to debut in the Spring of 2027. Stay tuned. It'll be the new Boeing 747-8 VIP Air Force One.

  • @ernestyeagley512
    @ernestyeagley512 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Franklin D. Roosevelt the presenter says while showing a picture of Pres. Gerald Ford. That should give some validity and credibility to the rest of the video.

  • @miztrusa
    @miztrusa 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is no supersonic 747 but I do think Emerites is working on a supersonic A380.... That's what the leader of the free world should be in even if it's today's version.

  • @B-rian937
    @B-rian937 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I would really like to see how the landing gear on the illustration works. 😂

  • @spaceace1006
    @spaceace1006 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The new Air Force 1 will be a fully refitted Constitution Class Starship with Landing Capability!
    She will include 4 Danube Class Runabouts and 8 Wedge Fighters! 😁

  • @Homoprimatesapiens
    @Homoprimatesapiens 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is their provision for extra pilots and their comfort, or are the two pilots suppose to pilot the aircraft for days in a cramped space.

    • @2hcobda2
      @2hcobda2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Autopilots from the movie "Airplane" earned their "Stripes" there.
      A 747 is shown crashing into the airport terminal near the end of
      the movie.

  • @user-ik1sc3fj9n
    @user-ik1sc3fj9n 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    🎉😊😊 yes like it

  • @melheinrich5438
    @melheinrich5438 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Isn't anyone thinking about a smaller airforce one for all those short hoops too saving money?

  • @PeterNGloor
    @PeterNGloor 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    what a strange title???

  • @glenkellner9936
    @glenkellner9936 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Um someone doesn’t know the difference between FDR and Gerald Ford?

  • @TermitesRGood1
    @TermitesRGood1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    when the President steps on any plane be it Commercial say for 20 minutes they change the Call-sign to that plane then change it back after the President leaves the aircraft........

  • @rapidcars1
    @rapidcars1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The plane should reflect the colors of the flag. The blue should be darker like on the flag.

  • @donaldboyer8182
    @donaldboyer8182 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What happens to them when they are replaced? Scrapped?

  • @forexed8948
    @forexed8948 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Air Force One is the president's callsign.

  • @markhillary7402
    @markhillary7402 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    So politicians can get ahead of thier own lies?

  • @marcosavila8215
    @marcosavila8215 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    5x the speed of sound?? seriously? wow

    • @jetli740
      @jetli740 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yes it can fly at that speed in nose dive on full power

  • @craigr.h.laurent240
    @craigr.h.laurent240 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Why is there background :music" in this video. It is especially annoying while the narrator speaks. No one needs to be "entertained" with that "music."

  • @MrJeepCanada
    @MrJeepCanada 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I hate click bate I wanted to see Air Force one look like the thumb nail lol

  • @formerice
    @formerice 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Figured it would be solar powered, hehe.

    • @2hcobda2
      @2hcobda2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      kamala sas yes & you can see moon craters with your own eyes

  • @davidd1395
    @davidd1395 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Oddly enough EMP is how they took out Senator Wellstone.

  • @frozenflyify
    @frozenflyify 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Air the airstairs foolproof ?

  • @MrJ-dc3yz
    @MrJ-dc3yz หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't know if Boeing should make AirForce 1 Something might fall off.

  • @charlesjohnson4492
    @charlesjohnson4492 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why take it down unless this is fake news as in other videos that are simulations from gameplay videos just so the video shows a false picture of a new military piece strictly for views.
    Is this real or made up for views only. Will there be no response as usual?

    • @frankcherry3810
      @frankcherry3810 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Its called Bait and Switch

  • @sazzadullahhasansardarsaki4318
    @sazzadullahhasansardarsaki4318 หลายเดือนก่อน

  • @internationalsolartech
    @internationalsolartech 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I did not hear one single word about the Mach 5 Air Force One....Did anyone else?

  • @markhilla5401
    @markhilla5401 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hopefully it has a ejection seat

  • @kimseymour8896
    @kimseymour8896 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No mid air refueling? What are they thinking ? That’s absolutely foolish ! They have to have refueling in flight. That’s a cover your butt maneuver !

  • @hermis2008
    @hermis2008 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I do not believe for a second the engines cost 22 billion dollars as stated in the video. That sounds ridiculous to me.

  • @research903
    @research903 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Click Bait...

  • @cruzin6123
    @cruzin6123 หลายเดือนก่อน

    5 times the speed of sound? Year, right.....

  • @The101stEagle
    @The101stEagle 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kinda wowed about 1.8 mach.

  • @Dr4gonWarrior
    @Dr4gonWarrior 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where is the five times speed of sound?

  • @charlesroer972
    @charlesroer972 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ask the judge if too pricy ?

  • @hans-peterleemann9253
    @hans-peterleemann9253 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    what a jock

  • @doznoff362
    @doznoff362 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you can't refuel airborne fix it! You got people sitting around just thinking shit up

  • @AngelAdrian-sk3fy
    @AngelAdrian-sk3fy 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is real or fake

  • @tahititoutou3802
    @tahititoutou3802 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I need not see the video to understand it is a hoax! If THAT structure is hypersonic, then the Ford model T is a race car!

  • @Mullikia
    @Mullikia 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    6:48 Hm, must be Biden's personal boarding chair.

  • @leongossett5691
    @leongossett5691 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think they don’t want air to air refueling because it’s to dangerous to do it with the president Boared

  • @justinthomas2538
    @justinthomas2538 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Its RED WHITE and BLUE. In that order only. Thank you! USA!

  • @brentsummers7377
    @brentsummers7377 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    OMG! If Biden had one of those planes he'd be taking 3 day weekends on the beaches of Italy and Greece instead of Delaware😂

    • @davidmembril9576
      @davidmembril9576 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And I wouldn't blame him...

  • @Ban-Xi
    @Ban-Xi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    $22 bln got engines 🤨for a $3.9 bln contract?

  • @Flacowboy4hire
    @Flacowboy4hire 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Has the Wrong pictures of some President’s

  • @eottoe2001
    @eottoe2001 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Oh yeah, supersonic and it will piloted by Bigfoot. Yeah, that's the ticket.