@colinmacmillan2944 I know every scene and shot of that movie, they even flew spitfires and 109's (buchons) over my head when filming. The first time I ever saw those aircraft flying. Just about every air war movie has outtakes from the BoB including Tora Tora Tora and any cheap budget war movie of the last 20 years.
Gallipoli was one of the first great Australian films. Danger Close is a recent film about the Battle of Long Tan. Read the history, then watch it and tell us again that Australian film-makers ignore historical accuracy.
@@andrewstrongman305 Tell me where I said they did? Gallipoli was released in 1981 but if that's your definition of 'these days' then fine. I'm not singling out Australian movies at all by the way but films generally. If you're happy with films like Napoleon - as an example - then more power to your elbow mate.
All of these look like “streaming crap movies.” A historically accurate movie can’t be made anymore because of the risk of offending certain groups. Something as important as the Second World War deserves to be told as accurate as possible.
Hollywood seems to think, the 2WW is still ongoing and "black propaganda" to smear the enemy must go on endlessly. Germans (and Japanese) must be played extremely evil, bloodthirsty, but also dumb and ridiculous. Movies made in Sixties were absolutely the best - "Tora, Tora, Tora", "Battle for Britain", "The Eagle has landed"
@@tbolt2378 Actually, part of the problem faced by movie-makers is that WW2 language has never been allowed. The Japanese were "the Japs", Germans were "Jerries" , Italians were "Eyeties". "Tora, Tora, Tora" and "Battle for Britain" were fortunate to have plenty of original aircraft to use, but budget constraints have usually resulted in obvious mock-ups in place of real vehicles, particularly German tanks.
Before Dawn, was filmed entirely in Western Australia. The director is a friend of mine and I am even listed in the credits. Jordon Prince-Wright the Director/Producer used over $1 million worth of explosives, ( when set off they even were recorded on the Richter scale for earthquake, such was the force of the explosions.) All firearms are real and nothing was plastic. Where it was wet and muddy it was real, it was made on site on a farming property at Esperance, where the farmer donated his property and even helped dig the trenches. It was based on factual diaries from local identities. There was nothing fake about it, except where changes to dialogue were set to create a storyline. God bless.
Wasn't the Classic, Gallipoli mostly filmed in W.A? For this one, I'd have thought they'd use Victoria or NSW for the free rain and mud, also overcast skies.
@@andrewstrongman305 .. Some parts of Gallipoli were indeed filmed in WA, but most were in SA and NSW. However Jordon Prince-Wright, a West Australian and local lad, wanted to make it all in WA, except for a few headline type personalities everyone were local people, keeping the local experience and economy in WA. He didn’t need to look beyond the local industry and assistants to produce what he has done. At only 25 years of age he is an amazing young man with bigger things to come. With the backing of his parents and many, many people he produced what some thought impossible. He knew what he wanted to do and he did it. Congratulations to Jordon.
@@moviegoer21 .. Yes it does, I am a Justice of the peace and is listed next to another, we assisted with all his paperwork and we are credited with this.
I stopped watching Hollywood movies and Netflix. If I want to be informed or entertained, I will read a book about World War II. Author Damien Lewis wrote several. In this way I can avoid all the historical misrepresentation and all the 'diverse' characters written into history where they never existed. Seriously, the social engineering is a turn off!!
"Blitz": The Battle of Britain, as seen by civilians on the ground. (Apple TV) "Before Dawn": World War I, on the Western Front with Australian troops. "Bonhoeffer": The life and times of Lutheran Pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer in World War II Germany. (Angel Studios) "Shamrock Spitfire": Irish pilot Brandon Finucane with the RAF in The Battle of Britain. (Ready to Stream...) "The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare" (Sorta based on true events...)
I have no faith that any movies made anymore will be worth a bucket of warm spit as regards in any way shape or form even coming close to actual history. At least the movies fifty years ago and such were not intended to make social agendas come true.
I thought Masters of the Air was good. The amount of comp footage vs. CGI was fairly impressive knowing how few forts and 109s there are. I did enjoy spotting the G models that had their chin turret and cheek guns removed to play F models. Of course, the scale of the missions and the limits of framing resulted in some inaccurate and a little cartoonish shots.
The one entry I'd love to see is 'Before Dawn'. One of the first truly classic movies made by Australian cinema was 'Gallipoli', which remains a benchmark. Australian diggers earned a reputation on the Western Front that is celebrated even today by the French. Of our 60,000 killed in the 'Great War', most fell in France. It's something that's more important to us than cheesy, flag-waving, and I trust that this movie is as realistic as possible. 'Danger Close' realistically portrayed the Battle of Long Tan only a few years ago. I expect no less from 'Before Dawn'.
Guy Ritchie's Ungentlemanly warfare seems again absolute bullshit. Absolutely not historical but mindless teenager video-game orientated waste of time and money. I can't even understand how you can compare it to the other movies in the list which appear far more interesting. Maybe I'm too old for this kind of stuff but even as a teenager I would have found it boring 🤥
DID I See a TV in a bombed out house in Blitz ? If it seems I did ,then I have very little faith in movie directors today.They lack realism,accuracy and for the period dress sense .I'll stick to books accuracy and events of the time.
I don't think it's a TV, though I'm not sure what it is. It may be a radio combined with a record player. The BBC had actually begun television broadcasts before the war started, but they were suspended for the duration. So a TV in a bombed out house would not have been absolutely impossible. However, TVs would have been very expensive at that time and that doesn't look like a rich person's house.
Been watching a couple of modern war films and I'm afraid that the acting and the script was very poor. You can't beat the war films of the 50s, 60s and early 70s.
Not very historical, only let non-whites have guns towards the end of WW2. No way any African American would have commanded a ship, USA only let women into combat in the mid-1990s. FYI I don't agree with this but it's still historical, I doubt any woman or African American would have commanded anything until recently.
The black person in the blitz pictures is the director of the film. I'm not sure if they will have many black actors in the film or not, but the confirmed cast seems to show one black actress and one Indian one, so not too unrealistic in my opinion
"Ungentlemanly Warfare" on place nr.1? The movie is getting only "meh"-reviews and is obviously trying to be a kind of watered down Inglorious Basterds. So it isn't a realistic movie. Only a kind of parody...and only half as good (at best) as Inglorious Basterds, that is playing in the same league of fantasy ww2 movies. And that movie is on place nr.1 of warfilms in the ranking? Interesting...
The reviews for ungentlemanly warfare were not out when I made the video. I just had to guess off the director, plot and actors involved if I thought the movie would be good or not. Turns out I was wrong lol
@@HistorySparkRace Baiting as Normal you won't eradicate the white Race from film and TV with Cultural misappropriation, Make a film about Black and Asian Soldiers who fought for the Nazis plenty did.
If you want to see a real documentary of Black Flyers see "Wings for this Man (1945)" narratored by Ronald Reagan. Oh! Wait, Reagan was a racist, that's what Rev Jesse Jackson said. That's the Democratic Party narrative.
That Steve McQueen film, are the stars American? You never mention whether it is a film about the, mainly, British people who lived, and died, throughout the Blitz. Or is it yet another American fantasy about how they, all alone, beat the Japanese, Germans, and Italians, and saved the world for Whack Ronald restaurants?
Forced diversity in our historical movie's is a massive problem and must be called out. TH-cam deleted this comment several times because the truth hurts.
I watched Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare yesterday (on YT, will add link). I too like Guy Ritchie but I was not impressed. A comic book style movie that reminds me "never get your history from Hollywood" Check reply for YT link to movie
Before Dawn looks better IMHO than 1917, Bonhoeffer looks really good as does Shamrock Spitfire [unintended pun that the movie is 'grounded' btw? ;)}. Blitz and The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare look to be disappointingly pandering to the 'woke' agenda. Using unknown actors can go two ways; either they are rubbish /or/ they are good and you spend the movie investing in their characters instead of trying to remember what you've seen them in previously. Also if the viewer ignores everything that is a 'X vehicle' they'll watch an unknown actor in preference to X.
Read my above comments on ‘Before Dawn’..... Filmed, Directed and Produced entirely on location in Western Australia, except for a few headlining personalities, everyone associated with the film are local identities. The dirt was real, the mud was real, the firearms were real, the ‘rat’ was real, the blood, because of personal minor injuries caused by hitting ones hand with a hammer was real. Nothing was plastic, I know because I am also listed in the credits. The Director/Producer and writer, Jordon Prince-Wright has wanted to make this film for many years after reading the diaries of some the original soldiers. 😎🇦🇺
All of these new war films look awesome. Not sure if you have seen 1917, the remake of All Quiet On The Western Front and War Horse as these are all WW1 films. Some other WW1 films are Passchendaele, The Lost Battalion and The Red Baron. Passchendaele is about the Canadian Expeditionary Forces at the battle of Passchendaele, however it's more of a war romance similar to Peral Harbor. The Lost Battalion is about a U.S Battalion that gets surrounded by German forces and holds the line. This is one of my favorite WW1 films.
All movies made about the two World Wars these days are a joke at best. 1980 Das Boot, 1969 The Battle Of Britain, 1964 The Train, 1970 Tora Tora Tora, 1962 The Longest Day, 1976 A Bridge Too Far. That should get you started. In the good movies you'll notice that your opponent is more realistic
If you’re looking for a religious movie with recurring religious themes then Angel Studios is for you. You should make that clear to people because I think it’s annoying.
Learn how to at least pronounce the German language.... The name is Dietrich Bohnhoffer, said as"Deetrick Bohnherffer". (in German the name Dietrich has an 'ie' ipronounced as an ee' and 'Vorbei' with an 'ei' is [pronounced as an an "eye"... 'Hoffer' (with the umlaut - the double dots above the o, sorry I do not know the correct keyboard shortcut for that.), is closer to 'herffer' but spelt as Hoeffer in English. There a lot of tricky pronunciations for English speakers, besides those....
For the United States , World War two started when the fascist empire of Japan bombed Hawaii on a Sunday morning, not one of these moves is about world war two in the Pacific - Woke liberals ignore the war with Japan because they do not want to depict Caucasians fighting Asians - for every 10 world war two movies 8 are about Europe and 2 are about the actual conflict that plunged America into the war - The Japanese bombed the United States , not the Nazis - The top 10 war movies on Netflix are also only about Europe -
That last one looks so stupid and PC .....someday someone needs to make films of the greatest combat soldiers in WW2,THE GERMANS!!but its never gonna happen.
Still using footage from the 1968 Battle Of Britain movie? And it's still better quality than the 2023 CGI!
You noticed that too, huh? And I agree with you.
@colinmacmillan2944 I know every scene and shot of that movie, they even flew spitfires and 109's (buchons) over my head when filming. The first time I ever saw those aircraft flying. Just about every air war movie has outtakes from the BoB including Tora Tora Tora and any cheap budget war movie of the last 20 years.
@@fus149hammer5 I really doubt that any scenes from BOB was in TOra Tora Tora
The chances of any historical movie being made and actually historically accurate these days is less than 0 so I wouldn't hold my breath.
Gallipoli was one of the first great Australian films. Danger Close is a recent film about the Battle of Long Tan. Read the history, then watch it and tell us again that Australian film-makers ignore historical accuracy.
@@andrewstrongman305 Tell me where I said they did? Gallipoli was released in 1981 but if that's your definition of 'these days' then fine. I'm not singling out Australian movies at all by the way but films generally. If you're happy with films like Napoleon - as an example - then more power to your elbow mate.
Watch the ten-part World War 2 documentary, "Europa: The Last Battle", it's one of the very few worth seeing.
@@wolfenstein6676 Neo-Nazi drivel?
I guess you didn't see"Saving Private Ryan";"Hacksaw Ridge";"Dunkirk";"Fury" or "Red Tails"
All of these look like “streaming crap movies.” A historically accurate movie can’t be made anymore because of the risk of offending certain groups. Something as important as the Second World War deserves to be told as accurate as possible.
Boy are you right!
Watch Danger Close, mate.
A good job was done with The Outpost.
Hollywood seems to think, the 2WW is still ongoing and "black propaganda" to smear the enemy must go on endlessly. Germans (and Japanese) must be played extremely evil, bloodthirsty, but also dumb and ridiculous. Movies made in Sixties were absolutely the best - "Tora, Tora, Tora", "Battle for Britain", "The Eagle has landed"
@@tbolt2378 Actually, part of the problem faced by movie-makers is that WW2 language has never been allowed. The Japanese were "the Japs", Germans were "Jerries" , Italians were "Eyeties".
"Tora, Tora, Tora" and "Battle for Britain" were fortunate to have plenty of original aircraft to use, but budget constraints have usually resulted in obvious mock-ups in place of real vehicles, particularly German tanks.
Before Dawn, was filmed entirely in Western Australia.
The director is a friend of mine and I am even listed in the credits.
Jordon Prince-Wright the Director/Producer used over $1 million worth of explosives, ( when set off they even were recorded on the Richter scale for earthquake, such was the force of the explosions.)
All firearms are real and nothing was plastic.
Where it was wet and muddy it was real, it was made on site on a farming property at Esperance, where the farmer donated his property and even helped dig the trenches.
It was based on factual diaries from local identities.
There was nothing fake about it, except where changes to dialogue were set to create a storyline.
God bless.
Wasn't the Classic, Gallipoli mostly filmed in W.A? For this one, I'd have thought they'd use Victoria or NSW for the free rain and mud, also overcast skies.
@@andrewstrongman305 ..
Some parts of Gallipoli were indeed filmed in WA, but most were in SA and NSW.
However Jordon Prince-Wright, a West Australian and local lad, wanted to make it all in WA, except for a few headline type personalities everyone were local people, keeping the local experience and economy in WA.
He didn’t need to look beyond the local industry and assistants to produce what he has done.
At only 25 years of age he is an amazing young man with bigger things to come.
With the backing of his parents and many, many people he produced what some thought impossible.
He knew what he wanted to do and he did it.
Congratulations to Jordon.
your name doesn't appear
@@moviegoer21 ..
Yes it does, I am a Justice of the peace and is listed next to another, we assisted with all his paperwork and we are credited with this.
@@Terry_weston4570 Looked for your name on IMDB
I stopped watching Hollywood movies and Netflix. If I want to be informed or entertained, I will read a book about World War II. Author Damien Lewis wrote several. In this way I can avoid all the historical misrepresentation and all the 'diverse' characters written into history where they never existed. Seriously, the social engineering is a turn off!!
Excellent point, sir. When you see a black man in WWII movie you know it's woke shit. Kudos.
So true,
Thanks for the previews from Ireland 🇮🇪
your welcome, Irish history does not get portrayed enough in movies so i am glad that its starting to change
"Blitz": The Battle of Britain, as seen by civilians on the ground. (Apple TV)
"Before Dawn": World War I, on the Western Front with Australian troops.
"Bonhoeffer": The life and times of Lutheran Pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer in World War II Germany. (Angel Studios)
"Shamrock Spitfire": Irish pilot Brandon Finucane with the RAF in The Battle of Britain. (Ready to Stream...)
"The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare" (Sorta based on true events...)
I have no faith that any movies made anymore will be worth a bucket of warm spit as regards in any way shape or form even coming close to actual history. At least the movies fifty years ago and such were not intended to make social agendas come true.
I thought Masters of the Air was good. The amount of comp footage vs. CGI was fairly impressive knowing how few forts and 109s there are. I did enjoy spotting the G models that had their chin turret and cheek guns removed to play F models. Of course, the scale of the missions and the limits of framing resulted in some inaccurate and a little cartoonish shots.
@@KyleCowden Masters of the Air was a series not a movie.
I have to agree 100%..
If its a good war movie now days you have to stumble across it somewhere. I been wanting to watch greyhound but havent seen it anywhere.
Watched Battle of Britain tonight. Throughly enjoyed it.
IF the film "Blitz " scene is real - there seems a lot of traffic for fuel-starved WW2 Britain........
1917 and All Quiet on the Western Front are relatively recent blockbuster WWI films
yes, 1917 is probably the best world war 1 movie i have ever seen !
@@HistorySpark Watch Paths of Glory or Lawrence of Arabia then.
@@HistorySpark Seriously? Wow!
Still waiting for a remake of the Longest Day buy then as realistic as Band Of Brothers
Great video brother from New Zealand 🇳🇿
Thank you, I appreciate the support bro
Typical ordinary people in the London Blitz were POC?
Not unknown in London at that time, but far from common.
The one entry I'd love to see is 'Before Dawn'. One of the first truly classic movies made by Australian cinema was 'Gallipoli', which remains a benchmark. Australian diggers earned a reputation on the Western Front that is celebrated even today by the French. Of our 60,000 killed in the 'Great War', most fell in France. It's something that's more important to us than cheesy, flag-waving, and I trust that this movie is as realistic as possible. 'Danger Close' realistically portrayed the Battle of Long Tan only a few years ago. I expect no less from 'Before Dawn'.
Try honey, lemon juice, hot water in equal parts plus 2 panadol, Au honey if you can get it.
We gonna experience it IRL soon😂
Guy Ritchie's Ungentlemanly warfare seems again absolute bullshit. Absolutely not historical but mindless teenager video-game orientated waste of time and money. I can't even understand how you can compare it to the other movies in the list which appear far more interesting. Maybe I'm too old for this kind of stuff but even as a teenager I would have found it boring 🤥
Your right I watched it yesterday, very comic book. Is on YT will give link.
th-cam.com/video/mHtkYmnOAMU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=HSVwC1BHQw55JQ1J Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare, link may not last long
Those Aussie soldiers look awfully clean cut for being on the front line.
DID I See a TV in a bombed out house in Blitz ? If it seems I did ,then I have very little faith in movie directors today.They lack realism,accuracy and for the period dress sense .I'll stick to books accuracy and events of the time.
I don't think it's a TV, though I'm not sure what it is. It may be a radio combined with a record player. The BBC had actually begun television broadcasts before the war started, but they were suspended for the duration. So a TV in a bombed out house would not have been absolutely impossible. However, TVs would have been very expensive at that time and that doesn't look like a rich person's house.
That last one looks like a crock of sh!t.
But lame and with a chick and Black guy in it. I wonder which agent is Gay also ?
Been watching a couple of modern war films and I'm afraid that the acting and the script was very poor. You can't beat the war films of the 50s, 60s and early 70s.
My mom was irish and she always tried whiskey honey and lemon juice.
I hope, above all, that they have a super diverse cast.
I don't think you'll be disappointed!
The good news is that Halle Berry will be playing the ships Captain in the latest WW 2 naval film. A strong black woman is need for the role.
You left out “brave”…😀
Not very historical, only let non-whites have guns towards the end of WW2. No way any African American would have commanded a ship, USA only let women into combat in the mid-1990s. FYI I don't agree with this but it's still historical, I doubt any woman or African American would have commanded anything until recently.
You should add Monte Cassino
I’m looking forward to all these movies!
great to hear, i am as well !
Well for a start, it was very unusual to see any black Londoners at that time,I know I was there.😊
The black person in the blitz pictures is the director of the film. I'm not sure if they will have many black actors in the film or not, but the confirmed cast seems to show one black actress and one Indian one, so not too unrealistic in my opinion
Best WW1 movie, in my opinion, is the 2017 remake of 'Journey's End'.
Shamrock Spitfire and Bonhoffer look good.
Do you normally talk that fast ? 😳 Or is there something wrong with my audio
The narrator could have made a minimal effort at pronouncing Dietrich Bonhoeffer correctly.
Neat movies.
For the love of all that's holy, learn how people's names are pronounced and re-do the voice-over properly.
Bon-hoe-effer? 🤭
Thanks👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
your welcome, glad you enjoyed the video :)
"Ungentlemanly Warfare" on place nr.1?
The movie is getting only "meh"-reviews and is obviously trying to be a kind of watered down Inglorious Basterds. So it isn't a realistic movie. Only a kind of parody...and only half as good (at best) as Inglorious Basterds, that is playing in the same league of fantasy ww2 movies.
And that movie is on place nr.1 of warfilms in the ranking?
Interesting...
The reviews for ungentlemanly warfare were not out when I made the video. I just had to guess off the director, plot and actors involved if I thought the movie would be good or not. Turns out I was wrong lol
@@HistorySpark
Fair enough!
Greetings
Mega
Ungentlemanly Warfare is on YT. Very comic book movie.
th-cam.com/video/mHtkYmnOAMU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=HSVwC1BHQw55JQ1J link to movie prob won't last YT's copyright checks, I was not impressed
3:57
Android notification
*based ON, not "based off of."
All these that show black hereos, wo,ey crap will fail !!
No it won’t
blitz has a black director which is the black person being depicted in the videos and it shouldnt impact the movies quality in any way or form
@@HistorySparkRace Baiting as Normal you won't eradicate the white Race from film and TV with Cultural misappropriation, Make a film about Black and Asian Soldiers who fought for the Nazis plenty did.
What the hell is wrong with you, its a movie production. Comment your political vlog elsewhere.
If you want to see a real documentary of Black Flyers see "Wings for this Man (1945)" narratored by Ronald Reagan. Oh! Wait, Reagan was a racist, that's what Rev Jesse Jackson said. That's the Democratic Party narrative.
Sounds like a load of crap to me. Nothing there.
must have been a Protestant irishman..
That Steve McQueen film, are the stars American? You never mention whether it is a film about the, mainly, British people who lived, and died, throughout the Blitz. Or is it yet another American fantasy about how they, all alone, beat the Japanese, Germans, and Italians, and saved the world for Whack Ronald restaurants?
Forced diversity in our historical movie's is a massive problem and must be called out. TH-cam deleted this comment several times because the truth hurts.
Yes he was.
I watched Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare yesterday (on YT, will add link). I too like Guy Ritchie but I was not impressed. A comic book style movie that reminds me "never get your history from Hollywood" Check reply for YT link to movie
th-cam.com/video/mHtkYmnOAMU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=HSVwC1BHQw55JQ1J Added as a reply as sometimes posts with YT links disappear.
Fake history to erase real history because of feelings.
Before Dawn looks better IMHO than 1917, Bonhoeffer looks really good as does Shamrock Spitfire [unintended pun that the movie is 'grounded' btw? ;)}. Blitz and The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare look to be disappointingly pandering to the 'woke' agenda.
Using unknown actors can go two ways; either they are rubbish /or/ they are good and you spend the movie investing in their characters instead of trying to remember what you've seen them in previously. Also if the viewer ignores everything that is a 'X vehicle' they'll watch an unknown actor in preference to X.
are they trying to suggest that in reality the Irish won World War Two for us ?
@@stevencutts6314 No more than a squadron based in France or Russia or Egypt means the French, Russians, or Egyptians did.
Read my above comments on ‘Before Dawn’.....
Filmed, Directed and Produced entirely on location in Western Australia, except for a few headlining personalities, everyone associated with the film are local identities.
The dirt was real, the mud was real, the firearms were real, the ‘rat’ was real, the blood, because of personal minor injuries caused by hitting ones hand with a hammer was real.
Nothing was plastic, I know because I am also listed in the credits.
The Director/Producer and writer, Jordon Prince-Wright has wanted to make this film for many years after reading the diaries of some the original soldiers.
😎🇦🇺
@@Terry_weston4570 Agreed, As I said, it looks better IMHO than 1917.
Nice to see a few movies where the USA doesn't win the war on their own
In both World Wars, the States joined late. In the Great War, they joined in 1917. In World War 2, they joined in 1941.
All of these new war films look awesome. Not sure if you have seen 1917, the remake of All Quiet On The Western Front and War Horse as these are all WW1 films. Some other WW1 films are Passchendaele, The Lost Battalion and The Red Baron. Passchendaele is about the Canadian Expeditionary Forces at the battle of Passchendaele, however it's more of a war romance similar to Peral Harbor. The Lost Battalion is about a U.S Battalion that gets surrounded by German forces and holds the line. This is one of my favorite WW1 films.
All movies made about the two World Wars these days are a joke at best. 1980 Das Boot, 1969 The Battle Of Britain, 1964 The Train, 1970 Tora Tora Tora, 1962 The Longest Day, 1976 A Bridge Too Far. That should get you started. In the good movies you'll notice that your opponent is more realistic
I wonder how many blacks there were in wartime Britain. Is Blitz a DEI movie?
I don't think so, just directed by a black perspn
Normal woke cast I see, not quite how 1939-1945 was.
I was thinking the same thing. Seems to be de rigeur these days.
I thought exactly the same thing.
What does woke mean?????
@@danrode104 I think all you need to know is that if you don’t know what it means, you are woke. Woke means you.
@@pointermom7641 LoL!!! If u don't know the definition of woke just say so...
If you’re looking for a religious movie with recurring religious themes then Angel Studios is for you. You should make that clear to people because I think it’s annoying.
I should hope Bonhoeffer has recurring religious themes. Appropriate if that is what motivated the subject.
It’s pronounced BonHoffer
I'm a hardcode war movie fan but will pass on anything movie made since 2020. They B!k wash and over represent the spoiled entitled group too much.
shamrock sucked , Arctic Convoy is very good
The last one sounds good, the first four not so much.
Learn how to at least pronounce the German language.... The name is Dietrich Bohnhoffer, said as"Deetrick Bohnherffer". (in German the name Dietrich has an 'ie' ipronounced as an ee' and 'Vorbei' with an 'ei' is [pronounced as an an "eye"... 'Hoffer' (with the umlaut - the double dots above the o, sorry I do not know the correct keyboard shortcut for that.), is closer to 'herffer' but spelt as Hoeffer in English. There a lot of tricky pronunciations for English speakers, besides those....
I will never give my money to the junk vendor apple
1 - woke garbage, 2 RAF history was only about 10 years at that stage, 3 - don't believe the hype its a sequel, 4 - boring 5 - woke garbage
No
Just NO !
I'll watch the films in my own collection.
What does woke mean???
@@danrode104 Its when you take something bad and inject failure.
@@TOKOLOSHE100 Like Jan 6th???
@@danrode104 Yep, you can see how tough life got since then so maybe you are correct.
More woke garbage
Please learn to pronounce names like Bonhoefer.
You don't have a clue about history or good movies do you 😂😂😂😂
For the United States , World War two started when the fascist empire of Japan bombed Hawaii on a Sunday morning, not one of these moves is about world war two in the Pacific - Woke liberals ignore the war with Japan because they do not want to depict Caucasians fighting Asians - for every 10 world war two movies 8 are about Europe and 2 are about the actual conflict that plunged America into the war - The Japanese bombed the United States , not the Nazis - The top 10 war movies on Netflix are also only about Europe -
Fair point
The battle for kohima and imphapl 1944. British and commonwealth forces stopped Japan from taking over India.
The Australian Army vs Japanese Army, battle for Kokoda. 1942-1943
American soldiers vs Japanese soldiers. 1944 Battle to retake the Philippines. Battle of Tarawa, also.
Battle for Singapore and Hong Kong. British and commonwealth forces vs Japanese imperial Navy and Army and Airforce.
Don't waste your time on this video. These movies are just woke nonsense and bear no relationship with reality or historical accuracy!!!
That last one looks so stupid and PC .....someday someone needs to make films of the greatest combat soldiers in WW2,THE GERMANS!!but its never gonna happen.
Apologise for loosing your voice …. The shame . The weakness
crappy production
The good news is that Halle Berry will be playing the ships Captain in the latest WW 2 naval film. A strong black woman is need for the role.