DIY Nuclear Fusion Reactor - Deuterium Fusor

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 330

  • @ScienceMarshall
    @ScienceMarshall  2 ปีที่แล้ว +95

    For all those interested in power generation, please read this pinned comment. The Farnsworth fusor is NOT a power reactor. The actual fusion energy being generated here is MANY orders of magnitude lower than the energy going in. This reactor is only used to demonstrate that nuclear fusion can be achieved on a small scale and as a decent neutron source. So please don’t ask how much power is being generated here or if it can be used to power your home.

    • @introprospector
      @introprospector 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Experimentalists hate him! Generate electricity to power your home with this one weird trick!

    • @Ripen3
      @Ripen3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You should welcome all kinds of questions, it makes your video more popular ;)

    • @kalancosta7650
      @kalancosta7650 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Ripen3 on this particular question I have to agree with the OP… simple logic should be used to see that if this machine did produce power output it would already be in production due to how simple it it is to build…. It’s not the OP’s job to answer the same dumb question over and over again

    • @Ripen3
      @Ripen3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kalancosta7650 I wrote it in case he wasn't aware, to help out. I don't see the point in discussing this further.

    • @Aaron-zu3xn
      @Aaron-zu3xn ปีที่แล้ว

      try building one like the helion device that fires two rings at each other compressing them in the middle

  • @TheBackyardScientist
    @TheBackyardScientist 3 ปีที่แล้ว +140

    Wow great job and awesome setup! Cool that you are still making videos.

    • @ScienceMarshall
      @ScienceMarshall  3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Thank you!! It’s good to hear from you again. We will have to catch up sometime. Yeah I wish I had time to make videos more often… maybe in the future I will.

    • @pico42ytalt87
      @pico42ytalt87 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      hi

    • @evelynjudd8641
      @evelynjudd8641 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Now i know this is legit

    • @SanriTV
      @SanriTV 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      When are you building hours @thebackyardscientist

    • @tracybowling1156
      @tracybowling1156 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ScienceMarshall You just go ahead and keep getting the education. You'll have plenty of time to make awesome videos when you're making all that $$$ @ NASA!

  • @zequilomogamer
    @zequilomogamer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    This video is a masterpiece, I've never heard of that PEM deuterium generator system, after reading for a while it turns out its more common that I though. Thank you for sharing all of this info and making it so easy to comprehend.

    • @peterlang777
      @peterlang777 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      nasa has a deuterium systm using erbium that can make fusion inside metals. 2017 patent by Vladimir pines of nasa Glenn research in Ohio

    • @Tayfaan
      @Tayfaan ปีที่แล้ว

      @@peterlang777 Well but that's obviously not appropriate for amateur fusion. The PEM cell is beautiful because it can generate fuel from cheap heavy water so you don't have to buy expensive high pressure D2 gas bottles and regulators to control the high pressure.

  • @EricDalgetty
    @EricDalgetty 4 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    I'm so happy to see it finally come together, the system looks great!

    • @ScienceMarshall
      @ScienceMarshall  4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Thank you! It was surreal to see those bubbles in the dosimeter during my first run.

    • @SadCatStudio.
      @SadCatStudio. 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ScienceMarshall is there anyway to make this for... *checks wallet * ermm, 6 euros and 65 cents?

  • @jeremiahnoar7504
    @jeremiahnoar7504 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    10/10. I'm building my first one next week. hopefully someday it will be as impressive of a set up as this one!

    • @BienestarMutuo
      @BienestarMutuo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great Work, you can use a van de graaff or bonetti electrostatic machine to produce higher voltages. Look at this : th-cam.com/video/nxagMrTVonQ/w-d-xo.html and this th-cam.com/video/QhDN2qEGQ5Q/w-d-xo.html Also i can tell you how to make this reactor work with no input power (after startup) and producing a lot of heat.

    • @theterribleanimator1793
      @theterribleanimator1793 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Ronald Brown yes but do they taste good?

  • @therealspeedwagon1451
    @therealspeedwagon1451 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This would be amazing to show off at a local science fair! I’ve always thought of creating a similar fusion reactor

  • @maurospagnoletti4787
    @maurospagnoletti4787 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hi, it's good to hope to control the nuclear fusion into an electronic laboratory, may be like cold fusion, but the energy balance is always negative and it'sn't the promise of fusion. I am doing geiger measurements too, be careful to electromagnetic compatibility with high voltage, it's easy to get saturation. Regards

  • @ExarchGaming
    @ExarchGaming 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is amazing. They're making massive strides in engineering and getting closer and closer to making this the next technology to power our civilization, with the abundance of resources, we could see a golden era, with cheap cheap but plentiful energy.

  • @matrix6235
    @matrix6235 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    It real fusion reactor, RESPECT AUTHOR!!!
    I'm Very bad know english language, but is is Very cool, thanks you author!
    I'm from Ukraine.
    P.S I like video, good luck :)

  • @henrikstenlund5385
    @henrikstenlund5385 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is so nostalgic for me as I worked in 1980-1986 with TOF mass spectrometers I built. The pumps and instumentation were very similar.
    Can you make the DT reaction be more effective in the Fusor if you force the ions to move fast back and forth? Instead of using a DC HV, you could use an AC HV in the MHz range to keep the ions inside the reaction area? The ions would go again and again to the center increasing the reaction efficiency a lot ro overcome the Coulomb scattering. Just an idea. Good work people.

  • @nameismetatoo4591
    @nameismetatoo4591 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    2:57 Ah, yes. State-of-the-art Harbor Freight monitoring equipment. Really the only choice when it comes to fusion reactors.
    Seriously though, nice work. It's always cool to see the complex devices that can be built in a garage using (relatively) obtainable parts. I'm surprised this video doesn't have more views. It looks like something that would be on Applied Science's channel. Ben would be impressed for sure!

    • @ScienceMarshall
      @ScienceMarshall  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, I spared no expense on the harbor freight voltmeter! Thank you for the compliments! Applied Science is one of my big inspirations.

    • @leerman22
      @leerman22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      My old boss bought one of those and I had to show him how shit they are. Rated for 300V It exploded in my hands on 120V! (Yes I was using the voltage terminal)

    • @patrickday4206
      @patrickday4206 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hahaha

    • @patrickday4206
      @patrickday4206 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@leerman22harbor freight meters are okay I've bought expensive flukes and had problems. Amazon has good cheap ones that are good quality 👌

  • @TheExplosiveGuy
    @TheExplosiveGuy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That dosimeter is _really_ cool, it's so simple yet ingenious. I've been playing with HV again lately after a decade hiatus (got shocked, almost died, but now the gun shy has worn off🤣) and in my quest to make a 1.6KJ capacitor bank charger I've made a rectified variac-fed MOT (with a couple different switchable current and voltage options using a series of different wattage and voltage light bulbs in series with the primary, with a switch on each one) that puts out up to 3000V DC, and now it has opened up a slew of opportunities in magnetron sputtering, wood burning, and now fusors. I definitely need to build one of these albeit a lot simpler than this one, that chamber is just way too nice for my taste (budget😔😅). I have a cheapo $100 vacuum pump but I need something a little stronger for one of these too though, it doesn't make anywhere near enough vacuum from what I hear. Anyone got a spare diffusion pump?😉

  • @williamackerson_chemist
    @williamackerson_chemist 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    This is insane, but in a good way. That's really impressive that you were able to put this all together like that. I've had people tell me even doing our sort of chemistry on a porch/garage setting was impossible XD
    Dude I found your channel doing research on the fan components to build my own fume hood, and noticed that my mom got me the same chemistry set as a starter kit when I was in 9th grade that is sitting in the back of some of your early fume hood videos (I recognize that characteristic porcelain crucible and alcohol burner with the test tube racks). I've been doing amateur organic chemistry for close to 6yr now, and it's still incredible what you can learn online with a little reading. Great work though, this is on another level... I'm assuming your major is physics.

    • @ScienceMarshall
      @ScienceMarshall  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thank you for the kind comment!! That’s funny how ubiquitous the chemistry supplies from that kit are that you were able to identify them, and neat that you had the same one! My parents got me that kit when I first started showing an interest in chemistry in middle school and it certainly helped to jump start my curiosity as well. I have fond memories of using the chemicals from the kit to do much more dangerous experiments that I found from reading online. They certainly weren’t recommended in the manual! I’m glad to hear that your fascination and hobby with chemistry is still going to this day. And you are correct, I did major in physics as well as chemistry as an undergrad. Now I am working on a PhD in physics. Thanks again for the comment, it made me smile!

    • @snibblesnoop
      @snibblesnoop 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      what kit did you get and where do you think i could get one?

  • @DaveElectronics
    @DaveElectronics 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Great project and amazing experiment!
    Also.. I'm a bit jealous of your 30kV CF feedthrough, quite rare/expensive piece right there :)

  • @RileyCourtier
    @RileyCourtier 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice. Very nice. Let's see CERN's fusion reactor.

  • @hunter1027
    @hunter1027 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Congratulations on the successful run! Very well done. I just replicated your early plasma discharge tube. It's great to see how far you have come.

    • @ScienceMarshall
      @ScienceMarshall  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you! I am glad to hear that you got a discharge tube working. Did you use a refrigerator pump for the vacuum or did you use a dedicated vacuum pump?

    • @hunter1027
      @hunter1027 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Science Marshal I used a 2 stage vacuum pump I had from a demo fusor and a 15kv 60ma NST that I had from my SG Tesla coil. The bottle produced a brilliant glow discharge, with striations. I just uploaded the video if you’re curious. Thanks for the inspiration and educational videos.

    • @ScienceMarshall
      @ScienceMarshall  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’ll go check that out now! I’m glad that you enjoyed the project and that my video was put to good use! I got my inspiration from other people’s videos and posts online, so I’m happy I was able to pass it on.

  • @levieux1137
    @levieux1137 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Too bad I didn't see this video earlier, it would have saved me time! I'll look for the dosimeter. I used the same setup of fuel cell and syringe as you did, however I didn't find it convenient to store, so I preferred to fill a small bottle by having deuterium remove water, and I store it top-down with some water at the bottom. I then open it under water and pick a little bit of deuterium with the syringe, then I can close the bottle. The water at the bottom is enough to make it completely sealed. I'll look deeper into your voltmeter schematics, that could help me as well. I'm using small power with a tiny central sphere (~8mm) initially due to limited room, and it seems to allow me to run at low enough current. Good job!

  • @photonik-luminescence
    @photonik-luminescence ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So this is an actual reactor since it gives off nuclear radiation. Cool ! For me in this project its not about the output efficency or anythink but rather the fact that you can just DIY something like this.

  • @survivalist2607
    @survivalist2607 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    this guy should be hired to make a fusion power plant, absolute genius.

    • @suitkais7
      @suitkais7 ปีที่แล้ว

      They don’t exsist for 1and for 2 a 12 year old built something like this

  • @PoorMansChemist
    @PoorMansChemist 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Finally YT recommended a video from someone I can respect!!! May not be useful for power but I am sure it can be used for other things.

  • @soheilkhiavi7912
    @soheilkhiavi7912 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi, Clean job. In my experience, the GM counter gets saturated by high voltage plasma before anything else, but the hot pixels on camera are definitely high energy particles, although I would not jump into conclusion about x-ray "only". Remove the camera lens and cover the aperture with a aluminium foil and watch the hot pixels.

    • @ScienceMarshall
      @ScienceMarshall  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you! I placed my xray/gamma dosimeter in front of the window and I measured a dose of 10 mrem/hour while operating around 25 kV, so there is definitely a lot of X-ray radiation coming out of the window.

  • @MaxwellAlexxis
    @MaxwellAlexxis ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mr. Burns will be proud.

  • @tinkmarshino
    @tinkmarshino 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you MUST make more of these video's!!! I am flabbergasted... what can I say.. I must think about what you have done here a bit.. I congratulate young man.. you hold the future in your hands.. be kind to it..

    • @ScienceMarshall
      @ScienceMarshall  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you for the kind words! I’d love to make more videos but I’m currently time and money limited due to being a college student... I hope in the future I can make videos more frequently!

    • @tinkmarshino
      @tinkmarshino 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ScienceMarshall Well you are going to make one heck of a scientist young man.. Carry on I will stay alert for more videos..

  • @Toxicity1987
    @Toxicity1987 4 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    So next thing to do is to build an Tokamak, but just skip this step an go straight for the Stellarator.

    • @ScienceMarshall
      @ScienceMarshall  4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Thanks for the tip. I'll get on that right away.

    • @CUBETechie
      @CUBETechie 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure 😃

    • @ArktourosUltorMaximus7600
      @ArktourosUltorMaximus7600 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep, but we need magnets for that. Not just any ordinary magnet.
      Powerful magnets within the range many Teslas.

    • @ArktourosUltorMaximus7600
      @ArktourosUltorMaximus7600 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ScienceMarshall You can also generate some tritium inside the fusor by putting some lithium foil inside. The Neutron radiation turns it into Tritium.

    • @OpenGL4ever
      @OpenGL4ever 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I am glad that you didn't propose to produce some Pu 239 of U238 and the neutrons.

  • @quantum-inc
    @quantum-inc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    that a real neat and well made Fusor. And well documented . Thankyou

  • @3er24t4g1
    @3er24t4g1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    I was going to build one of these but I got really depressed reading about proton decay and never did

    • @ScienceMarshall
      @ScienceMarshall  4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      That is understandable.

    • @blackwidows570
      @blackwidows570 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Can you elaborate?

    • @cvspvr
      @cvspvr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@blackwidows570 yes

    • @lyricordedproductions
      @lyricordedproductions 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      maaaaan I'm just learning about this & it's blowing my mind in to the universe.

    • @Muonium1
      @Muonium1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@blackwidows570 he is joking. the experimentally derived lower bound for the half life of protons and hence the universe is over 10^33 years.

  • @pro.shyammanavfanclub1826
    @pro.shyammanavfanclub1826 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hello sir, can you make oxygen concentrator or liquid oxygen generator with household things..if you could ,it will help many people in emergency situation and save their lives...thank you.

    • @starchief93
      @starchief93 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Water electrolysis produces hydrogen and oxygen

    • @jitterrypokery1526
      @jitterrypokery1526 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yeah, any ambient air water condenser would get you water to electrolysis oxygen out of it

  • @AtlasReburdened
    @AtlasReburdened 4 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    That's how you get government ants.

    • @Muonium1
      @Muonium1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      nah, still gotta make a video showing it doing neutron induced fission in a piece of U or something to attract those ants

    • @AtlasReburdened
      @AtlasReburdened 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Muonium1 I think Codydon Reeder would strongly disagree.

    • @Muonium1
      @Muonium1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@AtlasReburdened even Cody wasn't doing anything illegal. I still wish he would have told them to fuck off and continued with his experiments. It's a totally clear freedom of speech issue. Nothing whatsoever illegal in the US about converting uranium ore to the metal on a miniscule scale like he was. They just like intimidating people and they need to be put in their place.

    • @AtlasReburdened
      @AtlasReburdened 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Muonium1 While I agree with the sentiment of your second post entirely, I still won't recant my original post. It was nothing more than the display of his multi-plate rotary fusor(and of course, the blind and ignorant zeal of government jackboots) that garnered the knock on his door.

    • @Muonium1
      @Muonium1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AtlasReburdened what is a multi plate fusor

  • @Ersteller
    @Ersteller 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Grat Video. Awesome setup and thoughtful presentation 👌.
    What I wonder is who is behind the drywall?

  • @levimiller3597
    @levimiller3597 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for this video, I got stuck while working on mine, and this really helped! 😊

  • @waterfuel
    @waterfuel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    John Keely, of his 1800's workshop in Philadelphia, had tech notes published, and a portion of his frequencies section would be beneficial for controlling Cold Fusion testing of deuterium. "The Snell Manuscript"- which is summary of 3 Keely's lab note books. One amazing test was frequencies applied for condensation of ambient air in sealed brass globe with various levels of vacuum formed on open bath mercury manometer vacuum gauge, without cooling, suction pump, or chemical ablation. He said he had control of the forces of nature. Tesla didn't like him because Keely got more of investors' money than he did.

  • @chemistryscuriosities
    @chemistryscuriosities 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great job! Congratulations on a very successful run.

  • @ThurVal
    @ThurVal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi! There is one point i couldnt find out about.. how hot does the fusor get? Esp. The inner surface of the vacuum chamber. A fusionreactor blanket is covered with wolfram.. for example

  • @gppl77
    @gppl77 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Really one of the most informative videos on the fusor construction! I've started to build a demo fusor, with a goal to upgrade it once to a real one. Could you pls show or give a link how to make a proper flyback transformer? Anyways, thanks for a really good explanation)

  • @quantumlab9130
    @quantumlab9130 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I’m glad to see how everything come together. Now I want to try to build one myself. I have a couple of questions if you wouldn’t mind answering them. First Are there any rotary vane vacuum pumps that can get down to a low enough pressure, if not then would a turbo molecular pump work well. Second where did you buy your bubble dosimeter, I can’t seem to find them anywhere.

    • @ScienceMarshall
      @ScienceMarshall  4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I would recommend that you head over to the fusor forum at fusor.net/board/. You should spend many hours reading through the FAQ threads. Your questions have been answered there. My mistake early on was not spending enough time reading the forum before beginning to purchase components. There is a lot of knowledge, useful tips, and trial and error that have been documented there already. So it's best to learn from other people's success and mistakes! As far as the bubble dosimeters go, they are only sold by BTI Bubble Technology in Canada. The model I got is the BD-PND. You will have to contact them through email to make an order. Also the bubble dosimeter should be the last thing you purchase when you are completely ready for fusion as they have a limited shelf life.

    • @quantumlab9130
      @quantumlab9130 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ok, thank you and keep up the awesome projects.

  • @Neptunium
    @Neptunium 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    nice work! congratulations and welcome to the neutron club!

    • @ScienceMarshall
      @ScienceMarshall  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you! I've enjoyed reading about your fusor work on the forum.

  • @aSpyIntheHaus
    @aSpyIntheHaus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Neighbours on the other side of that wall opposite the x-ray view port: "Why is it when the TV reception drops out, I get this warm fuzzy feeling and I can see the bones in my hands?"

  • @illumiNOTme326
    @illumiNOTme326 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's some impressive work. Great job

  • @KyrychenkoAnton
    @KyrychenkoAnton 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just WOW, huge thumbs up. Stupid question - can electricity be generated in any way (even theoretical) with your reactor?

  • @AaronSchwarz42
    @AaronSchwarz42 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dope neutron source brother :) Good job & cool video!

  • @RyanHeaney42
    @RyanHeaney42 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is incredible. Thanks for sharing.

  • @StephenGillie
    @StephenGillie 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    When news articles say kids 14 and under have done all of this work, I don't believe them. My first question would be how they got all of this stuff without their parents knowing - or did the parents "help"?

  • @caiarcosbotias1710
    @caiarcosbotias1710 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing job and great presentation!

  • @ShampootheSpider2019
    @ShampootheSpider2019 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have been working for pinewood in roblox since a while,it’s better be careful with the fusion and core,I wore a PET hazmat suit and went to the core,therefore it worked except during meltdown

  • @seanmennecke4177
    @seanmennecke4177 ปีที่แล้ว

    VERY COOL! I am going to power my house with these

  • @slimeinabox
    @slimeinabox 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Going to be honest, I thought you made and actual Fusion Generator (as in for general power production) and NOT a Fusion Reactor, used to produce special matter(s).

  • @cupofsadge8359
    @cupofsadge8359 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow neat. What would happen if you placed your hand in front of the view port? Is that enough radiation to definitely or potentially cause cancer?

  • @lyricordedproductions
    @lyricordedproductions 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    hooooly mooooly this is blowing my mind!!! & the proton decay

  • @neuronneuron3645
    @neuronneuron3645 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I missed the part where you talked about the energy output, but could this potentially be an energy solution? On a micro level? Small-scale units powering homes?

  • @marthengabriel4938
    @marthengabriel4938 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a great achievement 🔥

  • @panayotchomakov2234
    @panayotchomakov2234 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The next question is how to transform the produced energy in electricity. The energy must be greater then the input energy. I wish you luck!

    • @Baigle1
      @Baigle1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Most forms of energy recovery rely on heat generation, but this requires moving parts, pressure differentials, refrigerants and heat pumps, and imperfect thermodynamic isolation. Since the neutrons break apart after a little while into protons and electrons you may be able to envision an electrochemical mechanism like a fuel cell, but with added energy recovery for hot electrons and protons via charge steering (proton positive, takes different path than electron.). Fast neutrons are very tricky to capture safely, and they do a lot of damage to any materials they hit, and can leave behind lasting radiation from transmutation or decay initiation.

    • @evilcowboy
      @evilcowboy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The estimate is something like 1 watt produced to 1,000,000,000 watts used. You are looking for the magical man made break-even reactor to which no one has be capable of producing especially from a DIY reactor. Plus as the other guy pointed out the fast neutrons are very difficult to safely capture.
      There are currently no such thing as a break-even reactor created by man as no man made reactor has been capable of it.
      God's reactor, the sun, is a break-even reactor and that is the closest you can come to seeing one in action. That is why the sun is so goddamn amazing.

  • @humbuccaneer84
    @humbuccaneer84 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice camera. If ever again... make a picture of something you always wanted to look thru.

  • @bakedroosterz4386
    @bakedroosterz4386 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    congratulations! well done.

  • @tejassharma6150
    @tejassharma6150 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    very impressed sir. So I'm a College student and had a couple of doubts I hope you would oblige to answer :
    1) What are the measures you took to contain the radiation, or was it negligible since the run was so small?
    2) What was the output ratio that you were able to get? Is there anything you would have done better to increase that?
    I'm looking to do Fusion as my Final Year thesis and would love to hear some good news. Nice forum article!

    • @ThisAintIt435
      @ThisAintIt435 ปีที่แล้ว

      How did your thesis go

    • @thejagtimes
      @thejagtimes ปีที่แล้ว

      How did your thesis go

    • @tejassharma6150
      @tejassharma6150 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was impressed with what I put out given it was at the peak of Covid. My paper wasn’t exactly great as it was a review paper more than a research paper
      My design was on AutoCAD as I wasn’t able to procure the materials for actual construction, given the restrictions in the country I was in and the industry wide lock down made it hard for companies to provide with lab materials like the gas and specific pumps

    • @tejassharma6150
      @tejassharma6150 ปีที่แล้ว

      I changed my thesis to then a comparison between Tokamaks and Stellarators.

  • @beppinococca
    @beppinococca 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Se ve que es muy buen video! Pero lastima que no hablo inglés! Hace tiempo quise hacer deuterio al vacío con una lámpara metiendole hidrógeno

  • @elliotcapson3101
    @elliotcapson3101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Such a cool project. I’m working on my own at the moment, and I’m wondering if the chamber gets hot to the touch.

    • @ScienceMarshall
      @ScienceMarshall  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, the chamber does get hot after a fusion run! That is one of the downsides of using a smaller chamber like mine for fusion. A larger chamber doesn’t heat up so much.

    • @elliotcapson3101
      @elliotcapson3101 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ScienceMarshall Awesome. I was hoping I could be able to add some sort of peltier module or something, just so I can say it has a purpose lol. Do you remember what size your Turbo Pump was? I've found a few on eBay, and cheaper than come of the diffusion pumps oddly enough. Also I don't have to fill it with the ridiculously expensive diffusion pump oil.

  • @Baigle1
    @Baigle1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Congratulations! Please add shielding behind the window sensor, and consider wrapping the 316 Stainless vessel with a neutron absorbing and blocking material like Boron, Cobalt, Titanium or Molybdenum (316 Stainless only has around 2% Moly, no Titanium), with something dense and non-radioactive like Pb-204,206,207,208.
    This is a great achievement, but there are 10, 20, and 80 year consequences for increasing your exposure to fast neutrons and 30keV Xrays. At that energy the attenuation through water puts them at around 3 centimeters depth. As the energy goes up, they begin to go through much more material before they are blocked, and as they go down, there is a higher chance they will hit something in your body that might give you cancer.
    P.S. What do you think about accelerator moderated fusion?

    • @nourkrayem6428
      @nourkrayem6428 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      hello, i am trying to build a fusor reactor, but I do not know what is the thickness of 316 Stainless needed for this.

  • @TheUnclestein
    @TheUnclestein 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you use a turbo molecular pump instead of a diff pump?

  • @peniss5496
    @peniss5496 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bet you 5 bucks he's on a watch list

  • @flyingdutchman3860
    @flyingdutchman3860 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Congrats on your build. I didn't quite understand your gas feedthrough. Do you not use a mass flow meter or some sort of needle valve to have fine control over the pressure?

  • @h7opolo
    @h7opolo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    5:00 rig up an x-ray sensor, too!
    oh, you did! 6:00

  • @rty1955
    @rty1955 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So question: I assume this cant be self sustaining. I have heard a story of Farnsworth getting it to sustain for almost a minute. If it can be self sustaining by using just the deuterium as fuel, can the titanium sphere be replaced with titanium pipes and inject water which will turn to steam to spin a turbine to produce electric?

    • @jeromedavis7816
      @jeromedavis7816 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I know this is a super late response but seeing as no one else said anything i thought I’d chime in. To answer your question no probably not, there would be too many other atoms in the way of the H-2 to cause consistant fusion. What you can do is use to fast neutrons produced by this setup to cause fission in a fuel such as thorium then use the heat from that to boil water and spin a turbine but at that point you basically have a fusion reactor powering a fission reactor which, while still cool, isn’t necessary since you can make a fission reactor without all the extra steps

  • @nourkrayem6428
    @nourkrayem6428 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hello, i am asking for the thickness of the stainless chamber needed for this prototype. I saw the website mentioned in the description, but some information is missed.

    • @ScienceMarshall
      @ScienceMarshall  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The chamber was a standard Conflat reducing cross. I’m not sure what the thickness was exactly, but it is the standard thickness for conflat flange tubing intended for vacuum.

  • @ArashArfaee
    @ArashArfaee ปีที่แล้ว

    If you have a side project and are still in the university, never ever show or acknowledge that you've used anything belonging to the university even their garbage. You will have a hard time to get a patent because most universities have you sign an agreement that your IP belongs to the university when you get admitted.

  • @endermoore6700
    @endermoore6700 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    now i can make my doomsday device thank you forhelping me with this

  • @dankmemes6254
    @dankmemes6254 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's nice to see this project work out. You should try to create some microscopic amounts of tritium using lithium-6. But I suppose you'll find it hard to get lithium-6. You will find out why if you look at the uses of lithium-6

    • @notioncreanga
      @notioncreanga 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      you do know the half life of lithium-6 is under a second, right?

    • @dankmemes6254
      @dankmemes6254 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@notioncreangaThere is no half life for lithium 6. Did you mistake helium-6 with lithium-6 since helium-6's half life is under a second

    • @notioncreanga
      @notioncreanga 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dankmemes6254 Shit. Forgot that lithium-6 and lithium-7 are the only stable isotopes of lithium. My bad :)

    • @ronaldvankuyk908
      @ronaldvankuyk908 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you distill the tritium out of the worn out car batteries ? Ron cheap recycling

  • @thescience786
    @thescience786 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When you “pour in” hydrogen fuel, pressure rises a little bit. What is the maximum pressure you achieved during fusion?

  • @spycez1175
    @spycez1175 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It actually work now i can generate my own energy for my houshold thx a lot

    • @Sim2322
      @Sim2322 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No you can't. Takes more energy to run the machine than what the machine can give you. You'll end up with a hell of an electrical bill.

  • @renielksonsousamoura1764
    @renielksonsousamoura1764 ปีที่แล้ว

    Esta é uma importante tecnologia para tornar a humanidade uma espécie planetária.

  • @davyponte
    @davyponte 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    But is possibile know the energy product by fusion? It is much more than the energy for a fusion reaction?

  • @Aryahmmr
    @Aryahmmr ปีที่แล้ว

    Superbly made video! Informative and clear. How's your PhD going?
    I made a demo fusor a few years ago. Now I'm circling back to make a neutron producing version, so your video is quite helpful in seeing other people's set ups.

    • @ScienceMarshall
      @ScienceMarshall  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thank you! The PhD is going well. I’m kept busy between classes, research, and my one year old daughter! In the next year or two I’m hoping I’ll have more free time to work on personal projects and make more videos once I finish all my courses. Best of luck to you on your quest for neutrons!

  • @msrodrigues2000
    @msrodrigues2000 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool x ray emitter

  • @CUBETechie
    @CUBETechie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would you make experiments with Solar panels around it? And how far away should it be placed?
    Or did you need an fluorescent filter ?

  • @comandx984
    @comandx984 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi, is there any heat beeing produced in the chamber? If yes what is the temperature?

  • @venkatamenta5716
    @venkatamenta5716 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey, I am a high school student willing to do a project on fusors and neutron scattering I was just wondering if I can get your email to ask a few questions regarding the experiment and other things, Thank you

  • @theshuman100
    @theshuman100 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    you should really look into storing those fusion products to cash in on when the helium shortage finally hits

  • @brusso456
    @brusso456 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    what was the total input power used?
    a water pump?
    3 volts x 1 amp to generate deuterium
    how much deuterium in oz? to generate how much energy in watt hours
    30,000 volts x 5 mill-amps = 150 Watts output
    I read on the internet that fusion does not break even in energy in vs energy out.
    can it be used to store energy like a battery?

  • @gubban48
    @gubban48 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So lets say 30kV and 2,5 mA, that means the outcome effect of this reactor is around 75 W? I’m new to this, does this generate power, or just a reactor that makes heat

  • @brimful-cookie5947
    @brimful-cookie5947 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What can you do to prevent gettong any sickness from radiation? Also good job on the reactor. I am planning on building one.

    • @krow2248
      @krow2248 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Use a neutron moderator to slow down neutrons and cover the reactor with metal plating

    • @demoniack81
      @demoniack81 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't stand in front of the beam. That's literally it.

    • @leerman22
      @leerman22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do not look into the operational end of the device.

    • @humbuccaneer84
      @humbuccaneer84 ปีที่แล้ว

      Iodine... rodin coil if you don't want to affect the neighbors... but maybe first culculate the circumference of the moon. Useless but save.

  • @SamMenon-zh9vn
    @SamMenon-zh9vn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    is it possible to determine the neutron output from the fusor (neutons/sec). I am trying to compare the outputs from this Fusor and a D-D NG

  • @leerman22
    @leerman22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You gotta try breeding thorium to uranium 233.

  • @yofitzzz
    @yofitzzz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm a student learning a bit about this. Can anyone explain like what this would be able to power? Could it power a house? Or a car? Amazing video, thank you and sorry for my lack of knowledge.

  • @edu.33
    @edu.33 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    How much power is being generated here, can it be use to power my entire home?

  • @ArktourosUltorMaximus7600
    @ArktourosUltorMaximus7600 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    OMG. That's amazing 😮😮

  • @etch3130
    @etch3130 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice job. A reliable fusor powered with a electrolysis rig is not something many people do. How do you feel about it overall? Worthing doing over the traditional methods?

    • @ScienceMarshall
      @ScienceMarshall  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks! I think that the electrolysis method was much better than using bottled deuterium. No pressure regulation needed and no worries about running out since I could get a lot of deuterium volume out of just a little heavy water volume. It’s also cheaper and much more accessible to the home experimentalist.

    • @etch3130
      @etch3130 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ScienceMarshall And what about drying? The FaQs gloss over that quite substantially.

    • @ScienceMarshall
      @ScienceMarshall  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      From what I’ve read, drying will give a substantial increase in the fusor’s neutron output. That would be one of the first upgrades I would make to the system!

  • @Eddiezerintube
    @Eddiezerintube 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I need to know about how to make a desktop synchrotron (proton accelerator). Is for satellite project.

  • @JanSpekman
    @JanSpekman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Science Marshall, do you know if this is correct? Or am I still missing something/is something redundant?
    Vacuum chamber
    Power Supply (slayer exciter)
    Vacuum pump
    Geiger counter
    High voltage divider probe
    Thermocouple
    Neutron radiation detector
    Deuterium gas
    Large ballast resistor
    Airborne detector

    • @ScienceMarshall
      @ScienceMarshall  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sounds like you’re on the right track. I’m not sure what the airborne detector means. Also don’t forget some sort of high vacuum measurement that will let you know if you have a deep vacuum and allow you to monitor how much deuterium you are adding. You say “vacuum pump” but unless you’ve got an amazing mechanical pump you will likely need the combination of a mechanical vacuum pump and a high vacuum pump like a diffusion or turbo molecular pump to get the initial chamber pressure low enough. I would recommend using something like the ZVS driver + high voltage multiplier I used to obtain the high voltage DC. You need >150 watts sustained for 10 minutes or more in order to do detectable fusion with a bubble dosimeter. A slayer exciter isn’t going to work well for that. Even my power supply was on the low end power-wise. The bulletproof option is to use an X-ray transformer but those are a little harder to get a hold of. If you are really serious about doing fusion, please go to the fusor forum in the description and read as much as you can on the FAQs there. They will do a much better job than me at teaching you to do fusion.

  • @cezarykowalski5358
    @cezarykowalski5358 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    great job !

  • @jesusdacoast872
    @jesusdacoast872 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good job

  • @donemery2593
    @donemery2593 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's cool thank you

  • @warrenkistenbroker4598
    @warrenkistenbroker4598 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    awesome job! what other experiments or differences in power supply are you going to work on next?

  • @affiliatereviews4079
    @affiliatereviews4079 ปีที่แล้ว

    What happens if you use this to hit boron atoms with the hydrogen ions? I think it's viable

  • @thesciencelounge
    @thesciencelounge 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Outstanding

  • @lyricordedproductions
    @lyricordedproductions 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    is there any way to test it before using raw materials just in case?

  • @tonylai4060
    @tonylai4060 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi, thank you for the informative video. Would you mind me ask a question here: if I'm planning to use a 15kv neon sign transformer instead of the flyback, is it OK to use the exact same voltage tripler design as yours? Is there any need to manipulate the capacitance of these capacitors? I suffers from poor electrical knowledge, really appreciate for your help.

    • @tonyh6194
      @tonyh6194 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Power is power,it doesn't really matter

  • @cupygamer5499
    @cupygamer5499 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Could you make it able to generate usable power? And that is efficient, it outputs more than you input...

    • @ScienceMarshall
      @ScienceMarshall  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Farnsworth fusor is a notoriously inefficient fusion device. The actual fusion energy being released is less than a microwatt, and I’m running it on ~1000 watts with my vacuum system and power supply.

  • @dxb338
    @dxb338 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    didnt burning the deuterium just produce heavy water vapor in your air?

  • @dylanscott539
    @dylanscott539 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great job! Where did you land cost wise?

  • @Kongfufrank
    @Kongfufrank 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi. How to generate energy for a gas with this equipment? Is it possible to generate energy with it?

  • @ZeL-iq5sf
    @ZeL-iq5sf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Found a listing for deuterium on ebay from global rare gases just saying