Thanks for your kind words buddy. I rarely use it because I don't have time and only when I feel like making videos with a vintage lens (because I don't want to walk with a gimbal in the city)
@@Studio-FOCUSFILM thanks for the quick response. Do you find it an easy work flow now? I've been contemplating a used steadxp but I know there isn't many users out there. Did it crop your image much and was it worth the added steps in your production. Sorry for the thousand questions.
I spent countless hours on SteadXP when it first came out because it was revolutionary. I struggled a lot until I found out, but also the company until the software worked properly. Now it works flawlessly but the whole process is time consuming. If I had known then that cameras in the future would record motion data like the one I have now, I wouldn't have bothered. Programs like catalyst and gyroflow are very easy compared to the whole steadxp process. The only reason to get involved with steadxp nowadays is if you want to stabilize footage from vintage lenses in post or if you don't have a camera that records motion data. Yes the image crops as much as you want depending on how shaken the shots are. That's why it's better to write in 4k. The footage I shot here is HD Better to get a camera that records motion data and avoid the steadxp workflow 🙂
@@Studio-FOCUSFILM thanks once again for the advice. Yeah I have several cameras but I wanted to ideally attach it to the old skool micro cinema camera paired with vintage nikon cmount lenses. . Happy to go through the pain for that camera if I can have a gimbal style movement portable. Do you still have to do the whole jerk movement before each shot or did they get rid of that and make it more automated? Thanks again.
Absolutely amazing image and incredible stabilisation. Best steadxp example I've seen. Was this shot recently? Do you still uses steadxp?
Thanks for your kind words buddy. I rarely use it because I don't have time and only when I feel like making videos with a vintage lens (because I don't want to walk with a gimbal in the city)
I took the shots this spring
@@Studio-FOCUSFILM thanks for the quick response. Do you find it an easy work flow now? I've been contemplating a used steadxp but I know there isn't many users out there. Did it crop your image much and was it worth the added steps in your production. Sorry for the thousand questions.
I spent countless hours on SteadXP when it first came out because it was revolutionary. I struggled a lot until I found out, but also the company until the software worked properly. Now it works flawlessly but the whole process is time consuming. If I had known then that cameras in the future would record motion data like the one I have now, I wouldn't have bothered. Programs like catalyst and gyroflow are very easy compared to the whole steadxp process. The only reason to get involved with steadxp nowadays is if you want to stabilize footage from vintage lenses in post or if you don't have a camera that records motion data. Yes the image crops as much as you want depending on how shaken the shots are. That's why it's better to write in 4k. The footage I shot here is HD Better to get a camera that records motion data and avoid the steadxp workflow 🙂
@@Studio-FOCUSFILM thanks once again for the advice. Yeah I have several cameras but I wanted to ideally attach it to the old skool micro cinema camera paired with vintage nikon cmount lenses. . Happy to go through the pain for that camera if I can have a gimbal style movement portable. Do you still have to do the whole jerk movement before each shot or did they get rid of that and make it more automated? Thanks again.