Fiskars Norden N7 | Is it better than the Fiskars X7?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ต.ค. 2024
  • Looking for a good quality hatchet with the amazing durability of traditional Fiskars tools? This hatchet may be the one! It combines undeniable utility and higher quality materials to provide you with an amazing product.
    Purchase it here: amzn.to/3mc1c76
    Purchase the SHEATH here: reviewog.com/pr...
    -------------------------------------------------
    OUR SHOP: www.ReviewOG.co...
    SUPPORT us by using our AMAZON Affiliate link: amzn.to/2hqdpCb
    -------------------------------------------------
    Follow us:
    INSTAGRAM: / reviewoutdoorgear

ความคิดเห็น • 67

  • @daniels.5139
    @daniels.5139 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I do have the N10 for all purpose.. Here in europe for 80€..most expensive one yet but the longer it lasts the more i dont care about the price... It is shaving sharp, holds edge well.. Overall nice working partner for bushcraft and fire maker

  • @exuaf
    @exuaf ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love that hatchet. I used it in jungle, in my garden and chopping cow bones with very tiny chipping/rolled on the edge.

  • @scottnorvell2955
    @scottnorvell2955 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have the X7 and the N10. Love both styles. I have axes by Gransfors Bruk, Council Tools and Nedfoss. But most of the time I grab one of these. Fiskars gets a bad wrap far too often. Great camp and bushcraft axes. They are a little softer than a GB or other premium brand but guess what - you can sharpen it! And it sharpens easily. I’m a fan.

  • @Ve-suvius
    @Ve-suvius ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Steel in the heads are the same.
    From Fiskars:
    Thanks for your e-mail and question.
    The head and blade is made the similar way for both axes and the hardness is the same.
    Hope to have informed you accordingly.

    • @ReviewOutdoorGear
      @ReviewOutdoorGear  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good to know! Thanks for finding that out. I wonder why they list different information for the steels

    • @Ve-suvius
      @Ve-suvius ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ReviewOutdoorGear
      Glad to help.
      I always had much use of reading other people's comments as well.
      Yes, the info on websites can be confusing sometimes.
      Minor details are of extreme importance to many.

    • @JamesJames-jt3ts
      @JamesJames-jt3ts ปีที่แล้ว

      Similar doesn't mean the same

    • @Ve-suvius
      @Ve-suvius ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JamesJames-jt3ts
      Oh you want to say something also?
      Not much good info is it.

  • @Ve-suvius
    @Ve-suvius ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Btw , I'm waiting for Joe X to opload his destruction video of the X7.
    He already has done one of the X10.
    The X7 will come up also.
    The X10 showed to be a very tough cookie.

  • @troyjenkins3886
    @troyjenkins3886 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thinking about pickin one of these beauts up Thanks for the review.God Bless

  • @Jesuswillbeback
    @Jesuswillbeback 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like older version becouse i don't need take care of handle (oil) if i am in winter wood working

  • @johnnygreenshirt6215
    @johnnygreenshirt6215 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This is the best axe I've ever owned. It's the perfect size to carry compared to the other 5 axes I own. "Ego Buys" Easy to sharpen to a high sharpness of original. There are many Ash Trees in Scotland and Ash is one of the toughest hardwoods trees to chop due to it being very springy. As such this Axe deals with it very well. The back and pounding stakes "Holding mine in my hands as we speak" the two lines you can see in video or pole @8:24 will disappear after use, just use it. I thought this was a different N7 axe as mine are now flush and never noticed it wasn't useful for smacking in stakes. I have never had issues with it. It is 4 years old now and still looks brand new. Sharpened after every camp use of chopping wood, then adding a little olive oil after sharpening. Never do I go camping without my trusty N7 and yet to find another more practical Axe than the N7. I have just been looking in a few of my video's using this very same Axe. I would highly recommend this axe. Oh and one more thing. I would certainly invest in a sharpening stone 1000 Grit is more than enough for this axe. Like life look after things and they will serve you well.

  • @insanogeddon
    @insanogeddon ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I would stick with the original in that size they are pretty much indestructable. This seems like adding the weakness of wood without the ease of replacement or full benefit with feel/looks.

    • @jddyea5527
      @jddyea5527 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      People were bitching about not haveing a wooden handle. I love my splittingband chopping 23 inchers with polymer handles

    • @teemuholopainen4745
      @teemuholopainen4745 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Interesting, I was thinking they added strength to where the handle would break. You know ice hockey sticks break always at certain length from the end. You know how to replace the wooden piece on these?

  • @captd9206
    @captd9206 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The instructions say that you can't hit with the back of the axe

  • @Jakelol1980
    @Jakelol1980 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Fiskars is not Swedish its Finnish.

    • @ReviewOutdoorGear
      @ReviewOutdoorGear  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, did I say it was Swedish?

    • @Jakelol1980
      @Jakelol1980 ปีที่แล้ว

      My bad just heard Swedish hand forged steel.

    • @ReviewOutdoorGear
      @ReviewOutdoorGear  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ah yes. I was comparing the Fiskars steel to nice quality Swedish hand forged steel like Grans Fors and Hultafors

    • @Jakelol1980
      @Jakelol1980 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ReviewOutdoorGear Im Swedish and imo the Fiskars is better because they are cheaper and will last longer but they are not as good looking as Gränsfors or Hultafors.

    • @ReviewOutdoorGear
      @ReviewOutdoorGear  ปีที่แล้ว

      Interesting. How do you think the steel quality compares? Also do they last longer because of the polymer handle?

  • @BenryI
    @BenryI 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would rather get the N7 but its alot more expensive and I cant afford it so Ill get the X7

  • @Norden624
    @Norden624 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My name is Norden😱😱

  • @patriceb26
    @patriceb26 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bonjour so which one is the best ?

    • @ReviewOutdoorGear
      @ReviewOutdoorGear  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you have the money go for the N7.

    • @patriceb26
      @patriceb26 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ok merci 👍

    • @McXyu
      @McXyu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      the one you sharpen properly and take with you

  • @chris5957
    @chris5957 ปีที่แล้ว

    Only difference i see is the handle

    • @ReviewOutdoorGear
      @ReviewOutdoorGear  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The blade steel is higher quality.

    • @chris5957
      @chris5957 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ReviewOutdoorGear I haven't read that

    • @ReviewOutdoorGear
      @ReviewOutdoorGear  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The N7 has a double hardened blade whereas the X7 has single hardened steel.

    • @chris5957
      @chris5957 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ReviewOutdoorGear where did you read that?

    • @ReviewOutdoorGear
      @ReviewOutdoorGear  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Fiskars website.

  • @DrDennis
    @DrDennis ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Not worth $88.

    • @ReviewOutdoorGear
      @ReviewOutdoorGear  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The X7 really is hard to beat.

    • @jachrome2418
      @jachrome2418 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ReviewOutdoorGear At least price wise

    • @jhtsurvival
      @jhtsurvival ปีที่แล้ว

      I would say no axe is worth that

    • @jachrome2418
      @jachrome2418 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@jhtsurvival No axe is worth 88 bucks? Are you ok in the head buddy?

    • @jhtsurvival
      @jhtsurvival ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jachrome2418 are you?

  • @helterskelter156
    @helterskelter156 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The trans-7;
    Identifies as. Traditional axe, but all the same utility and budget materials “under the hood”.
    PS. A wooden handled axe that you cannot easily rehang is absolutely useless. This N7 is a novelty item.

    • @ReviewOutdoorGear
      @ReviewOutdoorGear  ปีที่แล้ว

      I’d agree, except they’ll replace it for free for life. So not completely useless.