Standard Addition Method

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ส.ค. 2024
  • In this video I describe how the 'Standard Addition Method' works. This approach provides a way of determining the unknown concentration of an analyte in a sample and is used when interferences in the sample matrix preclude the use of external standards.

ความคิดเห็น • 54

  • @grace5447
    @grace5447 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I wish I had searched for this earlier. I've been crying my eyes out for hours trying to understand this thing. Now I finally understand, thank you very much.

  • @waseeintemas413
    @waseeintemas413 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    9 year later this has helped me so much understanding this Standard addition concept for my 3rd Course! Thank you!

  • @eatscrickets
    @eatscrickets 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you for posting this video. I've used it to show my instrumental analysis students how to perform standard addition for AAS. It was easy to follow and they really liked it. Cheers!

  • @AW3SOM31510
    @AW3SOM31510 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Currently writing multiple lab reports and having a rough time up until your teaching clarity and the "Very Nice" picture at the end, thank you

  • @WrongWayNinja
    @WrongWayNinja 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love how you explain the concept behind them and then not explain how to run the equations that's my favorite part!

    • @daniyalhashmi6433
      @daniyalhashmi6433 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you still need help with equations like these when you're in instrumental analysis, you chose the wrong major lol

  • @gen3ralgustav
    @gen3ralgustav 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very informative! I have quickly found that these types of problems are extremely subjective, so knowing the mechanics/algebra involved is crucial to solving. Thanks Dr, you are helping me save my chem anal grade! :)

  • @user-kx2zs3ec3d
    @user-kx2zs3ec3d 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My analytical chemistry teacher spend whole lesson teaching Standards addition method and I get nothing at all. But I spend few minutes watching this video before midterm and I got it all🥹 Thank for your video. You are my life saver🤩

  • @dustinsmith8341
    @dustinsmith8341 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much. My teacher just glossed over this section and didn't explain it well because his slides were missing. I appreciate the explanation. I get it now!

  • @dkreller01
    @dkreller01  13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    @sterling729 You are welcome. I looked for a video on this subject and couldn't find one that explained it. So, I tried to create one.

  • @zeroxdude1
    @zeroxdude1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nice video, but in my opinion the the unit for the x-axis should be in concentration to make it easier to understand how the concentration unit was obtained at the end. The volume as x-axis approach can still lead to the right answer, however it requires one to remember the concentration unit used all the way at the beginning. In addition to it being clearer, I think it would be a great way to teach the students about the importance of checking unit.

  • @empirestate8791
    @empirestate8791 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Summary: You basically add increasing amounts of a standard to an unknown solution and dilute them in volumetric flasks, take the concentration of each solution (using an absorbance meter or something), and plot the data. You'll get a line. The y-intercept of the line is the response when there is only an unknown solution, and the slope of the line can be used to calculate the relationship between concentration and response.
    Formula: concentration_unknown = (y-intercept * concentration_standard ) / (volume_volumetricflask * slope_of_line)

    • @zguitarmaster
      @zguitarmaster 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Empire State this makes sense... can anyone else confirm this summary? I am writing this on a flash card

  • @finanhindam6332
    @finanhindam6332 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    truly helpful !

  • @igsr1869
    @igsr1869 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you. Very helpful

  • @imejandiskate
    @imejandiskate 9 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I still do not understand the concept behind how adding a known amount of analyte in intervals will give you the unknown concentration. I understand the math and how to calculate the answer, I just cant wrap my head around the big picture. fuck.

    • @Phaze252
      @Phaze252 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Wee bit late, but a simple way to wrap your head around it is imagining a bank account.
      You don't know how much money is in this bank account and you can't just check. When you try and use the account, you're only told if you have the available money.
      Now, considering how simple it is to just try and purchase many different items, this would be rather silly to do in practice but to make it work, let's say you can only attempt to purchase a brand new T.V.
      Your first attempt shows you can't, so you add money to the account incrementally until you're told you have enough. Then you simply work backwards to determine how much money was in the account.
      This is a little simplified obviously, but the overall principle is there.
      moles of unknown + moles of standard = total response.
      Once you figure out the total response how do you figure out the moles of unknown?
      moles of unknown = total response - moles of standard

    • @aonoymousandy7467
      @aonoymousandy7467 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for the question, this is also something that i didn't understand. Sure anyone could describe how to do a standard addition as a procedure but understanding the core concept will allow you to understand why the procedure is performed and why it works.

  • @idiot33912
    @idiot33912 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you so much. this method makes me crazy !

  • @karrarazizhassanabdullah628
    @karrarazizhassanabdullah628 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very informative!.
    Many thanks

  • @Jules-tv6mx
    @Jules-tv6mx ปีที่แล้ว

    wow what a video thank you for all

  • @prasenjitghosh2019
    @prasenjitghosh2019 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice explanation!

  • @princessbalboa
    @princessbalboa 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot. I wish you were my lab instructor.

  • @jackjoseph3419
    @jackjoseph3419 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish my quant. teacher made it this easy!!

  • @SaraAlshawabkeh
    @SaraAlshawabkeh ปีที่แล้ว

    thank u so much very good explain

  • @d.d.d.rukshan8835
    @d.d.d.rukshan8835 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was very clear! thank you!

  • @fleckerz
    @fleckerz 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is fantastic. Thank you.

  • @yefected
    @yefected 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much it was very helpful! What happens when the slope is negative and the relation is inverse (adding volume decreases signal)?

  • @bensonhk616
    @bensonhk616 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks a lot, you save my exam

  • @yousefjokmara788
    @yousefjokmara788 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are my hero thanks man

  • @icha1992
    @icha1992 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    for the first method, in order to find the concentration of the analyte, = (b.Cs)/(Vx.m)
    -b we can get simply by taking the y-intercept.
    -m we can get by finding the slope of the line
    -Vx is how much volume we take from the analyte at first.
    -Cs is the concentration of stock we prepare at first too right?
    are these correct? or am i getting this all wrong?
    Thank you so much.

    • @chisomos
      @chisomos 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +icha1992 correct

    • @maharnasar9279
      @maharnasar9279 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can u do one worked example.

  • @thecurious2825
    @thecurious2825 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks a lot sir....very useful,keep it up

  • @suhrabsayfi1082
    @suhrabsayfi1082 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is b/m taken? What does it give a ratio of? Unknown vs Standard?

  • @adamwiesner1
    @adamwiesner1 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    What happens if in a problem I'm given two different signals? A signal from my unknown and then a signal after the standard was added

  • @maharnasar9279
    @maharnasar9279 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you do one worked example.. it looks you this video for those who knew all about it. So please do some worked examples.

  • @ivanbombana7282
    @ivanbombana7282 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    In which tecnicques should I use this method?

  • @rinnemollema5826
    @rinnemollema5826 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So I feel like you're confusing Cs and Cx troughout this video in the formulas, or is that just me? 5:00 and 8:21

  • @sumannallathambi8482
    @sumannallathambi8482 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very Nice..

  • @RoRight
    @RoRight 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great stuff

  • @Agentmo485
    @Agentmo485 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the value of Cx? The problem I have has this set of Data (Known): Cs, Vs & Vx. Where do I find the value of Cx? I cannot compute number of moles for the analyte. Please help.

  • @ivanbombana7282
    @ivanbombana7282 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Unknown & standard at minute 1:10 are the same substance?

  • @irumhassan.5417
    @irumhassan.5417 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir is the external method of caliberation and this topic is same or not please answer me please

  • @chaofang6730
    @chaofang6730 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What solution was used to dilute to the flask mark line?

    • @MrNabows
      @MrNabows 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      water

  • @VincenzoCrawford
    @VincenzoCrawford 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    makes perfect sense

  • @lafilosocueva721
    @lafilosocueva721 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a question. How is it that you fill all flasks up to the same mark if the standard volume in each flask is variable and the unknown substance volume is constant? Am I missing something?

    • @annikabaker1802
      @annikabaker1802 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You add diluent (usually water) in varying amounts to fill each flask up to the mark.
      (I know this is probably two years too later for you, but hopefully someone else finds it helpful.)

  • @GovindaGhimireus
    @GovindaGhimireus 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow great..

  • @thecasualfront7432
    @thecasualfront7432 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    make a calibration curve and divide the slope by the intercept. just don't spike your first standard with stock. forget these equations, they're irrelevant

  • @hsulbjay
    @hsulbjay 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    GOOD !!!

  • @sccm100
    @sccm100 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I fucking hate analytical chemistry. I can't wait for it to be over