Religion, economics and extremism | Q+A Highlights | ABC News
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 มิ.ย. 2024
- The Q+A panel discuss global economic insecurity, Australia's cost of living crisis, and racism in sport and politics.
Subscribe: ab.co/3yqPOZ5
Panellists: Jonathan Sumption, Former Justice of the UK Supreme Court and author; Amanda Rishworth, Minister for Social Services; Mehreen Faruqi, Australian Greens Deputy Leader; Francis Awaritefe, Chair, Professional Footballers Australia; and Alan Oster, Group Chief Economist, National Australia Bank.
This episode was broadcast on Thursday October 6, 2022.
00:00 Introduction
00:50 Religion and Employment - Andrew Thorburn
10:17 Mehreen Faruqi, Pauline Hanson, and racist tweets
16:50 Cost of Living and Stage 3 Tax Cuts
26:32 Risk of World War III
ABC News In-depth takes you deeper on the big stories, with long-form journalism from Four Corners, Foreign Correspondent, Australian Story, Planet America and more, and explainers from ABC News Video Lab.
Watch more ABC News content ad-free on ABC iview: ab.co/2OB7Mk1
For more from ABC News, click here: ab.co/2kxYCZY
Get breaking news and livestreams from our ABC News channel: / newsonabc
Like ABC News on Facebook: / abcnews.au
Follow ABC News on Instagram: / abcnews_au
Follow ABC News on Twitter: / abcnews
Note: In most cases, our captions are auto-generated.
#ABCNewsIndepth #ABCNewsAustralia
![[TH] 2024 PMSL SEA GF D2 | Summer | ร่วมส่งแรงใจ เชียร์ไทยไปพร้อมกัน](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dN2gLsCJ0T0/mqdefault.jpg)
Sumption, as always, is the cleverest person in the room.
4:32 hatred and bigotry
I'm trying so hard to figure out why she's scowling. Does she disagree with him? She looks like the type who'd be fully behind what he's saying
She was expecting him to have the opposite opinion of her. Hilarious that he finished his sentence with what is effectively the liberal position.
Interesting commentary. 🙂👍
4:31 and these people call us the “hateful” ones lol. She is seething at the idea a man she disagrees with had a job.
*Wasn't Jesus against greed? this fella was the head of a bank. the irony!*
Just because he just is a leader of a bank doesn't mean he is greedy
@@danielrussell6079 lol
getting a 7 figure income plus bonuses a year whilst the company you run rips people off and kicks people out of their homes isn't greedy? I think it's greedy and morally wrong! especially when you are throwing stones at minority groups
Some of the modern churches encourage wealth accumulation, but in general wealth is unrelated to religion.
Religious schools and institutions want to be able to hire and fire people based on their religious beliefs, but as soon as anyone else wants to do the same, they scream discrimination. It has to be one rule for all. It's not religion nor homosexuality or anti-anything that's tearing society apart, it's hypocrisy and one rule for me and one rule for you attitudes that's doing all the damage.
For all its virtue signalling over tolerance, there is still not one openly gay footballer in the AFL. Will there ever be? And in defence of Christians here- in particular Catholic schools here - I worked alongside many staff in defacto relationships and gay staff in Catholic schools. Their lives and partners were welcome at staff functions. So they are being very tolerant of diversity.
The whole point of religion is to divide, to claim one religion is true (subscribing to it) and by default all others are not with no actual evidence is a bizarre way to behave, but that's not my problem it's Catholics and those who insist their religion is the true one.
Amanda Rishworth is embarrassingly poor at piecing words together that mean anything. Maybe she just isn't a very good public speaker but it sounds like she has no idea what she's talking about, and repeatedly presents an exaggerated fake kindness with obvious attempts at empathy. She brought nothing to the panel and perhaps even made a bit of a fool out of herself.
personal beliefs are always relevant. if I thought it was alright to punch anyone that annoyed me would you employ me?
That is not a belief but that is assault. Your example in itself is off the mark.
@@bidzam you missed the point completely whilst actually agreeing with it.
@@mikerobinson2008 You're not the sharpest tool in the box, are you Mike?
@@RogerJJSmith says the guy responding to a 3 month old thread.
*Would his church hire a gay person in a leadership role?*
Churches are exempt from legal discrimination charges.
No sorry
@@danielrussell6079 he should accept the same treatment.
@@MrBibi86 why you can't fire someone for being gay and you can't fire someone for their religious beliefs. You guys assume he hates gays because of the church he attends last time I checked that man is an individual. The God of the bible is against same set relationships because it goes against his design for humankind. And the God of the bible is against abortion as well because according to the bible life starts in the womb not after. (Leviticus 18:22/Luke 1:44
God bless you and turn your heart to Jesus Christ and believe in his death on the cross for the forgiveness of your sins and his resurrection from the dead
Does this woman want to abolish parliamentary privilege? That is a fundamental part of our political system. Politics is tough and you can't take everything political opponents say to heart and personal.
only 58 comments 😝 the wiggles gets more comments and views then this crap show
"faith" the cover for bigots.
Yes. And bigotry, a cover for lack of faith.
Does being anti-homosexual relationships qualify as "homophobic" ? What right does one segment of the community have to dictate to another segment what they can and cannot believe ?
don't know. I'm anti religion
@@MrBibi86 nobody asked you
is there a word for phobia of being labelled homophobic
@@MrBibi86 yeah religions and their gods need to go the way of the Dodo.
Ok snowflake ❄️
Why this lady not wear her hijab if it's so important in islam... In India mullah said that hijab is compulsory in islam🤣🤣i just don't understand are the Iranian women are against islam🤣🤣
4:32 The face of ABC's bias. Very "subtle" of you ABC - why not add a booing track and a laugh track next?
Isn't showing one person's disagreement to another person's statement more indicative of there being two sides to the argument. I mean, there was imagery and audio of people applauding points too. If anything, this is simply imagery of one person's opinion on a topic. It sort of signalled to me that the majority of the crowd was supporting the point being made. Different story if there were a number of people scowling about pro-choice opinions.
@@organicod2438 It could be if it were evenly applied. There wasn't any negative reaction shown when the lady before was making her point and I've noticed the pattern when it's points that the ABC tends to agree with that have supporting shots. That feels like bias to me.
@@forallofme4441 one easy solution for you to not be annoyed by it would be to only listen to the show. But I take your point. It is sadly not possible to have unbiased media. The human element, and the drive for ratings via outrage etc. is impossible to remove, I think
@@organicod2438 I've actually stopped watching Q+A for a while now. Just checked out this episode cause the title was interesting. Not watching it has been a really good solution for me. Now all I'd want is to stop funding the ABC altogether.
@@forallofme4441 Haha fair enough. I barely watched it either since I left Australia, but every now and again the clickbait finds me
Quality of this show has significantly decreased with illogical and quite left leaning panelists. Very biased show.
Move to the USA and enjoy a right wing hell hole. Democrats are not left wing by world standards, they are conservatives.
Australia isn't Australia any more.
Let's not pretend this is Australia
Nobody told me. When did that happen?!
Where the bloody hell are we?
Are you going to spam your racist nonsense? As I've already said, unfortunately for you your power is restricted to just one vote at the ballot box, so you basically get no say. That must eat you up knowing how powerless you are in spite of your tough racist talk.
What is Australia, fashboy?
@@channelname1019 it is a different nation with the name Australia slapped on.
While your comment is funny I am factually correct
@@farright118 "Factually correct"?
No, you are fatuously incorrect. You're nostalgic for an age that never existed and are projecting your own fascistic inclinations onto a skewed version of history. Australia has a shameful colonial history that should never be forgotten or ignored, but to pretend that Australian culture (outside of state propaganda) has ever been the jingoistic flag-waving white mono-culture that your imported US American style pseudo-patriotism (ie ethno-nationalism in disguise) tries to promulgate is an act of dense ignorance, knowing dishonesty or a combination of the two.
In short, you're full of shit.
13:30 Australia was founded by Europeans for Europeans.
Just because you have a piece of paper doesn't make you Australian.
That's not to say allied people can't be Australian ie. Koreans Japanese etc
Say it loud say it proud. Australia WAS founded by Europeans for Europeans. But it's time we erased that Eurocentrism from this great country.
@@qarey then it's not Australia anymore thus
giving me the democratic right to rise and and proclaim a new nation by the name of Australia whist re issuing citizenship and expelling the rest
Imagine pretending that you're an Australian nationalist while saying that it's European
Ok you racist. Unfortunately the power you have is restricted to just one vote at the ballot box, so you basically get no say. That must eat you up knowing how powerless you are in spite of your tough talk.
If you wanna start getting picky:
Australia was invaded and taken by Brits for Brittan.
You wanna talk national heritage? Better be First Nations. They're the only people who can claim any right to this land.