Asiana 214 ver 3
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ค. 2013
- Asiana 214 ver 3
Here is Update 3 of our reconstruction of the Asiana flt 214 crash at San Francisco International Airport on 7/6/13.
As mentioned earlier this a work-in-progress project with updated versions being posted periodically as new information and data become available.
The purpose of this project is to make available to our viewers and the public the most detailed and accurate visual reconstruction of the event possible considering the information available at the time of each new update. We will offer no opinions as to the cause of this accident but hope that our animated reconstruction will encourage discussion and dialog amongst you our viewers.
Here are the main changes made in ver. 3:
Runway 28L threshold displaced 300' further to the west. This is not shown in the latest Google Earth Pro imagery of the airport which was used in the 1st two versions of the reconstruction.
Water vapor shown being blown into the air for the 3 seconds prior to impact. This was most likely caused by the jet blast of both engines as power was applied for the 3 seconds prior to impact and the high angle of attack during that period of time. This vapor can be seen in the Fred Hayes eyewitness video.
Left engine separation and post impact travel. As was correctly noted by a number of our viewers the left engine ended up on the right side of the runway and not the left as shown in ver. 2. The engine likely separated from the aircraft at the moment the fuselage pancaked onto the runway and since full power had been applied just before impact it is very likely that the engine was still developing significant power at the moment of separation and perhaps even continued to produce power for a moment after separation while the fuel still in the engine fuel system was consumed. In a later aerial photograph we obtained there is clear evidence on the runway (scrape marks) that the engine actually passed the aircraft and followed a curved path in front of the nose ending up on the right side of the runway and igniting a grass fire in that area.
A split screen animation will also be posted later today illustrating the cockpit or pilot's perspective from this same reconstruction. We'll post a Tweet from our Twitter account as soon as it's uploaded. Be sure to follow us @EyewitnessAnimations.
We also very much encourage our viewers who notice any relevant inconsistencies in our reconstruction or have additional verifiable information that would aid in our project to please leave a note for us on our website "Contact" page. www.eyewitnessanimations.com
Thanks!
Capt. John Suchocki. EAL Ret.
![[ LIVE ] Rank เล่นแต่แครี่ ยาวๆถึง 100ดาว “วันนี้มีกิจกรรมลุ้นรับสกินมาบอกต่อ โก๋แก่ช็อกโกบอล x ROV”](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5NNgkhWj57Y/mqdefault.jpg)
Hello ppl I see most of u got recommended this after 7 years
yes
Yes
me too man!
im astonished
Where did you get your profile? and yes it's 7 years ago!
Yes
Gravity: *Do you believe in gravity?*
Plane: *There's no such thing as g-*
Gravity: *Instant push down*
Yes it's was zo
Pucci moment
It's because pilot started lowering the aircraft too early
Yes
Not the issue, but nice joke
It looks like the plane died on its final approach, its soul got separated from its body, and the plane's ghost landed normally while the dead body crash landed.
it did not happend irl, btw it was the sucseesful version of the landing
While bUttEr lAndIng
Lol
@@irsyadyusra5431 its a joke
plane was so done with flying that it dropped its own body lmao
Hello to those who got this recommended 7 years later
Edit: Thanks for the likes
Hi
Hello
Hi
Hi
ello
Must have been somewhat relieving for the ATC to hear the pilot talk back after realizing it crashed
As an ATP, I can confirm this is true. On approach, power for altitude, pitch for speed.
Wait.....
WHAT?!?!?!?...
@@alphakunch8277 it means, generally speaking, power controls glide slope, pitch controls speed. if you're going 160kts on final and you're falling short, you can increase power to shallow out your glideslope and use pitch to maintain speed at 160kts.
@@officiallynrgxlr8tr okay its all makes sense now..
Thanks for your information..
@@officiallynrgxlr8tr on approach power controls speed, pitch controls approach path? Unless it’s different in big airliners
@@albatrossflyer no, it's the same in big planes and small planes. power controls glideslope, pitch controls speed. watch a youtube video about it - it seems counterintuitive, but it makes sense when you think about it.
Although the lives that were lost are still obvious absolutely devastating, the fact that more lives weren't lost is miraculous to me.
from what I've read, there was one fatality, a girl who didn't have her seat belt on
@@starlight2622 I think it's 3 deaths
@@instinctivelycorner yeah because the driver can't see the passenger since it's covered with so much foam
the engine really said " bye have a great time"
It is real
@@eshan0013what
Every time I see this accident, I think of the pilots flying the aircraft-that they must live with the dread of that one flying error. And that there was fatality. _One damn mistake._ I understand that the flight attendants performed like champions - keeping their heads and getting everyone out. Great admiration. 💛🙏🏼
It was complete incompetence. Flying conditions were perfect, and as much flying time and experience of the flight crew, it was unbelievable.
@@brkitdwn Hold on there, brother Glitch! I have made mistakes when conditions were perfect. When seeing others, I like to use restraint with complaint.
There were a series of mistakes. Like putting them in cockpits seats....that was the first one. They botched that approach in numerous ways.
Dude 3 people died. Not a little oopsie daisy.
Very well-done. Seems quite accurate. Your efforts are much appreciated, and I am linking this to our airline forum. Nicely done.
W H A T
W H A T
W H A T
"Hey bro look this flare"
The bigger tragedy in this was SFO Fire Department driving over an unconscious girl ! Survives a plane crash only to have a fire truck drive over you.
Investigators are pretty certain that the girl was already dead. Nevertheless that is absolutely not supposed to happen
@@TheGOLDIdeluxe I read the report and one of the firefighters actually referred to the poor victim as a 'pumpkin' Inexcusable.
@@tonyb374 I read through the report again, Passenger 41E is mentioned on pages 118+119. In the whole report, the word 'pumpkin' is missing
@@TheGOLDIdeluxe I read it on Wikipedia. Here's the link. Go to the SFO Fire Department response.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asiana_Airlines_Flight_214
@@tonyb374 Wikipedia, where everything you read is real.
This is the first major airplane crash I remember and i would watch this video everyday.
Superb update, outstanding!
well done with the simulation, two thumbs up!
0:20 Engine be like: GAS GAS GAS
lmfao
Plot twist : *The animation has been created before the accident*
@Danish Dhiaurrahman I am joking bro hehe don't take it seriously ^_^
You guys cant tell whats a joke???
@Danish Dhiaurrahman haha r/woooosh go brrrr
@@Kevincents plot twist: the joke wasn't that funny
@@tegjwokjohn1839 oh I am sorry, don't take it seriously bro :(
This is an AWESOME animation :)
The discussion over the ver 2 doesn't slow down attracting almost 30K new visits or revisits overnight so perhaps there's no need to change anything after all. Good on you John - you've sure made some future adepts of aviation!
0:19
오 한국인
@duchol_Playz Bang Ding Ow
@duchol_Playz sung ting wong
@@theimpostor9510 I wonder if you make fun of white people
@@kiwikiwi2483 What is white people?
Me: literally at the gate for my plane back home
TH-cam algorithm: 👁👄👁
I got this recommendation 10 years after💀
Good job on v3. I suppose the next thing to look at is the audio sych - I don't see that the 7 miles out and clear to land occurred t the late point of the descent where you show them. You might consider playing earlier setup before you start the animation. The NTSB site has diagrams showing locations where various ATC conversations occurred.
I still have this recommended from 10 years ago
Awesome simulation. Real impressive. The end position of damaged plane, seems to be different position to overhead images... and I am relating to the seemingly "planes width" gap to the runway from the plane's stop position on overhead photos. Even with perspective and the like, your simulation sizes seem quite close. ie. is the plane size on your simulation too large or is the ground imagery too small or something else?
0:22 left Engine go *brrr*
I would have loved to have simply replaced the earlier version with the new one and kept the thread going but wasn't able find a way to do that. If anyone knows a way to accomplish that please let me know. Thanks
Pls tell me name of game
Tho I'm not sure on the engine (that's a weird case, isn't it) .. I believe this graphic is about as far as you can push it; based on the info that is available. I believe you'd need NTSB insights to further fine tune this.
Great job !
I remember seeing this on the news like it was yesterday
Jesus Christ it’s been 8+ years, time flies by
Is the depiction of those masts in the water accurate? It looks like he'd crashed sooner had he approached more to the middle of the runway instead on the right side. Because then his landing gear would've caught the antennas... as it looks now in this simulation, it appears as if his left wing is missing them by inches. Is this accurate or merely a false impression I'm having there?
I imagine that we'd have seen much more fatalities if those masts would've clipped his wing earlier...
So much for the back of the plane being the safest place.
Cool vid ❤
I know I'm 7 years late to the conversation, but thx for the animation
No one realize the plane in this animation have b777-300 wing??Asiana 214 is B777-200er not b777-200lr
You might be able to include an annotation on the Ver 2 video which states that there is a more "up-to-date" simulation available. You could even embed a link to this video. Hope this helps!
Hi John, congratulations on a great simulation but do you have to kill a thread of 1,383,728 visits and all discussion over your Asiana ver 2 video. Maybe it's possible to embed ver 2 and ver 3 in one screen?
I’m not a pilot, I’ll admit that but don’t the pilots have eyes and senses? Surely they could see they were too low? Surely?!
Yes They saw it's too low They tried to go around but it's too late
They were also fatigued.
great shit! Thank you
Uhhhh that is not ok
You have been chosen by the TH-cam algorithm, welcome...
I'll correct myself... I'm looking at the side road distance back to the plane end position, and your positioning is very close. Well done. Maybe just perspective angle back to runway why distance looks less?
I got this recommended for 9 years
ok saw this a week or two ago and now its getting in everyones recommended i shouldve left a cool comment
Did he used the PAPI lights on the runway or dose San Francisco dose not have them?
This is Capt WAI TO LOW speaking. Evacuate Evacuate. This accident should never have happened. Way to much trust in automation and no trust in their own flying abilities. As a professional pilot we force the plane to do what we want if automation don’t. All of us at some point in our flying career have had to intervene in good time to prevent the above from happening. And for any average and above average professional pilot this is not difficult to do. It comes natural.
"This video shows soul leaving the body"
In close approach, pitch provides more accurate control of flight path, power controls airspeed. Pitch gives the fastest, more EFECTIVE response to change altitude, flight path or airspeed than power. In most conditions, flight performance is a combination of "pitch and power"
There are limits: with fixed or limited power (like with takeoff, max. continuous power or not power -at all ask glider pilots), pitch controls either flight path OR speed, as required. ...
This got recommended to me after 10 years
Engine: fuck this, I’m outta here!
20 degrees pitch up. Pitch angle is not the same as angle of attack. What we show here may well be a bit conservative on pitch angle at impact. We'll know for sure once the NTSB releases the Flight Data Recorder.
That's happened with four Korean pilots in the cockpit in visual conditions
This crash happened because they were too low on approach which the pilots also knew by looking at the PAPI lights but they couldn’t do a go around and therefore the tail of the plane’s body separated and surprisingly some people actually survived the crash
The sad part is the emergency response caused the death of a passenger due to negligence
R.I.P All those lives, fly high.
Isn't it irony how firetruck ran over 2 young girls who are the only casualties
full luck that anyone survived.
Shows how times are different. Recent comments are joking about the "ghost" aircraft instead of talking about the actual incident
Got recommended after 10 years
What animation program is this? I want to make something like this
I don't know, maybe blender
Is the pilot that famous Cpt. Sum Ting Wong?
good representation
I believe the crash was caused by pilot error, am I wrong?
The ghost on top:
Ay bro watch yo jet
WATCH YO JET
It is not
Nobody is saying about the engine going vroom vroom 💨
For those who were wondering, the blue, transparent plane is the correct landing or something…
"hey, Sum ting wong."
"yes, Wi tu lo?"
"Ho lee fuk."
" bang ding ow?"
I don't even want to think of what would have happened if they hadn't had enough airspeed to make it to the tarmac and they would have clipped the steel poles that hold the approach lights above the water.
Ain't anyone gonna do a meme on the engine that was like: *N Y O O M*
Or the fire engine that ran over a living child on the ground while attending this crash.
OOOF PRESS F FOR THAT KID
F
Even had the wing stalled at this angle of attack, a stall does not stop the forward motion of the plane and cause it to "drop straight down". This is a perception based on misunderstanding science, regardless of what happens in every aviation disaster movie.
10 years later I see this💀
some people :gravity can't pull planes down
gravity:
Accurate view of me landing a 747 in MFS2020
Left engine: gotta go fast
I think this was a bit too low, because it did not make such contact with the water.
What sim is that
The plane came to a stop within the touchdown zone!
To be fair, that flight path was pretty close to the intended path. Only a few metres out.
Left engine: Ight Imma head out
Fun fact: the blue ghost was the successful ver. of Asiana 214
The ghost plane should be going faster no?
8 years and some how they recommend this
10 years later
They almost had a good landing but they crashed, rest in peace to the people who died.
why was it dropping so quick
0:19 THATS ALOT OF FLARE
How comes they decided to approach at lower altitude, don't they look at the PAPI lights on the runway?
Anyone watched this in 2021?
For a fucking hand even the balls get in the way! passengers were very lucky thanks to the efficient ground crew!
Nobody:
Engine 1: *speed*
LOL that engine just went rocket mode
Is this a game or animation if it is a game can I have the name?
Not a game. It's an amination from NTSB.
Did bro use a 767 instead of a 777?????
What is the game?
how on earth does a trained pilot make such a bad mistake?
I'm a "pilot" in Microsoft flight simulator. Not even i would fucking land like this.
@@coolandgood0062 haha same
Rip to the guy in the Bathroom of the plane
Isn't this the flight that become a meme because of some guy telling the wrong names of the pilots to the news?
Can’t believe he butchered that approach… don’t ever let him fly again, unless he’s by himself
emgine 1 was just like "peace out bitch I've had enough"
감사합니다 우리 한국도 많이 뉴스에 나왔답니다
Entendible
@@ahrenlyd747 cayese señora vayase a la mierda
@@yomastelbo8753 que te pasa ._.XD ni soy señora ni mujer
On pc or iPad