Stealing the money islands from Japan: Axis & Allies 1942 Online

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 56

  • @Cygnustheriver
    @Cygnustheriver ปีที่แล้ว +39

    Yeah, fighters can't land on friendly carriers. Beamdog has been aware of this issue for a long time but no fix has been forthcoming. I am guessing this will never be fixed as this has been an issue since day one.

    • @christopherquigley5468
      @christopherquigley5468 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I think Beamdog isn’t really developing this game anymore. I doubt there is a single person working on this anymore. They aren’t actually making money off it. The truth is, most of their sales happened during early access.
      It’s really too bad because there is so much they could do to improve the game. Different setups. Different maps. Bug fixes.

    • @AxisAndAlliesEnjoyer
      @AxisAndAlliesEnjoyer  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@christopherquigley5468 That is a bit unfortunate :(

    • @taylorthrow7850
      @taylorthrow7850 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yup they are idiots who got their money and ran.

    • @DennisCoffman-dd8ok
      @DennisCoffman-dd8ok 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@taylorthrow7850 well not completely idiots. They got the money first before running. The game is pretty bad IMHO, especially if you play against the AI. I have yet to figure out how to select losses when it isn't my turn. Ridiculous that it decides to keep an aircraft carrier and kill the fighter (even though it could land on a controlled land that isn't being attacked). Or keeping the AA gun when plane aren't even attacking.
      Maybe it plays better when it's all humans, but overall, looks like they got something out, got paid, and then abandoned it.

    • @taylorthrow7850
      @taylorthrow7850 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DennisCoffman-dd8ok yup years later you can't even see the board state of a finished game

  • @DaisyKilborn
    @DaisyKilborn 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Pretty underated Channel

  • @dzmcgaming4769
    @dzmcgaming4769 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Nice vid. great to see another content creator in this space, A&A Enjoyer.. :)

    • @AxisAndAlliesEnjoyer
      @AxisAndAlliesEnjoyer  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yo, no way. I remember watching a couple of videos when I first started trying to get good at A&A around 7 months ago 😂

  • @josephlabrie5984
    @josephlabrie5984 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I saw some of the comments about the sub submerge, but I think it was due to a destroyer in the attacking fleet that prevents any sub special action including submerge

  • @hllyenaylleth9576
    @hllyenaylleth9576 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Setting defense profiles set after the next turn of the faction set. If you want to have the sub submerge, it would have to be set pre game. Which is done in settings.

    • @DennisCoffman-dd8ok
      @DennisCoffman-dd8ok 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I haven't been able to figure out defense profiles at all. Not very intuitive and either before or after the game, there isn't anything to select on the drop down. Beyond frustrating. Well that and the continual "random" dice that seems to always roll 1 when I do a strat bombing or if I somehow get a strat bomb through, only does 1 damage...

  • @jonathandumas
    @jonathandumas 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Question: Round 3, why didn't Germany take Moscow ? (with minimal resources, say 2 inf, 2 tanks, 1 fighter). They lose it back, but they get Russia's money for that turn, no? Isn't it an obvious move ?

    • @shade1495
      @shade1495 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I was thinking the same thing lol. Apparently it wasn't an obvious enough move that two people missed it. Frankly the Axis player here was quite terrible.

  • @Xepent
    @Xepent 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It seems you dont really focus infantry too hard on the soviets, why is that? Wouldnt full (or nostly full) infantey builds force more infantry out of germany and slow down their mech production?

  • @Materialist39
    @Materialist39 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I’m stealing this UK early game lol. It is insane to have 6 fighters in India by J2

  • @kenhill5214
    @kenhill5214 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    3:44 Something I notice in the wording of defense profiles is very strange to me. It says, "Changes to a power's defense profile will not take affect [effect] until the next time is is your turn as that power. You are looking at the USSR profile and the USSR profile is not used in the SZ7 battle, because it is a UK battle. It will use the UK profile.
    What troubles me about the wording is it implies that the change does not take effect until your next turn as that power, which will be B1. That wording implies the G1 turn will use the old profile. I do not know why it should be like that.
    While I understand the necessity of an AI to control your units for your opponent while it is their turn, I think defense profiles are dumb. For example, when might you decide to lose your carrier before your fighter? You might be fighting to win and you want the extra points. You might decide to lose the fighter before the carrier if you are in a hostile zone and there is no safe place for your carrier to land. What if you have carriers in each situation and you want to handle them differently?
    When do you lose the bomber in a land battle? Again, you might lose it before the infantry if you are fighting to keep that territory and that one point might win the battle. When do you lose your AA gun? The order you lose your units might vary depending on the number of attackers and their chance of taking the territory.
    So I believe the defense profile should be final orders given to units, after deploying units - and you should have some way to combat test your defense profiles.

  • @chimochills
    @chimochills ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good video my man. I'll be posting my 1st A&A content myself shortly. 👍

  • @thedude0000
    @thedude0000 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why on earth would you want the Russian sub to submerge? It's there to take the hit and if you're lucky, let a Brit vessel live to fight another day.

  • @warallied
    @warallied 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love the format of the video, the commentary - plus you're a very rare one to do a split US strategy which i love to do. While its not a *true* split, you're using the US to do the same thing as the axis is trying to do but instead you're forcing them while using the UK and Russia to compensate
    this axis player wasnt a top player, the non existant pressure, the way he just allowed afrika to do nothing despite doing his best breakthrough there. He couldhave secured it and put more pressure on India+Russia from the south
    only criticism is how asutralia sat for too long imo. His japans started to build anything for turns LOL, let alone moving troops.

  • @DerAdler42
    @DerAdler42 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My advice for Russia turn 1 is to not retreat from Ukraine until the bomber is destroyed. That bomber does serious work, definitely worth risking some tanks.

    • @jazzman1919
      @jazzman1919 ปีที่แล้ว

      but then its an IPC trade off, and Germany can afford to lose some units but Russia can't take as many risks like that with the more powerful units.

    • @donaldshotts4429
      @donaldshotts4429 ปีที่แล้ว

      Idk? Say you have 3 tanks and an artillery left then now you're giving away 22 ipc in order to kill 12 ipcs. Now factor in +2 for the capture and you eliminate 2 German infantry in their counter. That still an even trade which is hard for the Russians to accept.

    • @bradmapson6243
      @bradmapson6243 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, the bomber can reach Egypt on turn one which enabled it's conquering turn 1

    • @sirundying
      @sirundying 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@donaldshotts4429 ppl that say that dont really play the game, germany have to send units and planes to retake it, also losing units on that battle so the 22 become less. also removing the bomber is a big hindrance for germany. 12 IPC spend to rebuy it is 2 tanks or 4 infantry less. if udont kill that bomber and fighter, africa is automaticly lost

    • @donaldshotts4429
      @donaldshotts4429 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sirundying Well a Platinum player withdrew the other day and killed me later, but he also had 8 infantry standing after West Russia R1. My cutoff is 3 tanks and 1 artillery. I'll retreat and save that for 1 German bomber. The bomber by itself doesn't guarantee anything in Africa R1. It upgrades Germany to a coin flip basically plus you're saving a minimum of 22 Ipc for Russia

  • @anislahrir2315
    @anislahrir2315 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you should try 1940 global BY FAR the best of the serie

  • @marionroark8237
    @marionroark8237 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I get tired of playing ranked and then the players wait the full 24 hours each time to see if I'll quit

  • @mike16apha16
    @mike16apha16 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    i think you needed to have brits on sub submerge and that's why the russian sub didn't submerge

    • @bravehome4276
      @bravehome4276 ปีที่แล้ว

      Possibly, although I had 2 US subs off Japan's coast on submerge (no other nation there) and Japan sunk them with a Cruiser/plane combo. So maybe submerge is busted?

    • @aardvarkpepper7660
      @aardvarkpepper7660 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Re: Russian/Brit submerge: There's some sort of weird implementation where, I forget what it was, the first nation there or the one with the most units applies its defensive profile to all units. So yes, USSR sub would submerge depending on UK's defensive profile in that situation.
      Re: 2 US subs: I'll have to take your word on it. But attacking air can't hit subs if attacker doesn't have a destroyer along. Possibly the attacker had a destroyer that was sunk, and only the attacker's fighter and cruiser survived? Or, again, a bug.

  • @maxschaub3201
    @maxschaub3201 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    buddy germany thought he could win the game with that surpirise attack on nelson mandela with the tank

  • @ItsMeTyler
    @ItsMeTyler ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just started playing the board games with my buddies. Great game, does online play different from the board game ?

    • @donaldshotts4429
      @donaldshotts4429 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same game, but alot of glitches. I just started playing and losing on Steam))
      Can't put a plane on a allies carrier for one.
      You can't bridge your transport or go 1 space pick up a unit then go to a different zone and attack. The angles of movement can be weird too? Had a Brit transport to the Netherlands and wanted to park it with my other warships but it kept directing me around England instead of underneath it? Strange? I might get a bigger monitor? Still fun though

    • @ItsMeTyler
      @ItsMeTyler ปีที่แล้ว

      @@donaldshotts4429 I personally don't like AA online. I use tabletop simulator for online AA. much better imo.

    • @sirundying
      @sirundying 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@donaldshotts4429 you can pick units then move before unloading

    • @donaldshotts4429
      @donaldshotts4429 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sirundying thanks. I've figured out a lot since then. I don't know if there are other solutions but I just move the transports 1 space at a time then unload. The only thing that irritates me at this point is I'll get in a big climatic battle and my AA and bomber will be sitting on the Battle board at the end and I'll lose by 1-2 units. It feels like I've already changed my defense profile, but I guess it always resets?

    • @sirundying
      @sirundying 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@donaldshotts4429 i play a cracked version of this game and the defense profiles cant be changes but i assume yes.
      you might wanna download the program TRIPLEA. its a platformewith like 50+ boards games like all the axis and allies that exist + others really really good and balanced maps.
      i also suggest ppl learn to play lowluck, as it removes the frustration of dice. i still have PTSD from board game nights where you throw 15 dice and hit only twice.
      if you really like axis and allies and wanna play on tripleA we can play. im personnaly gonna buy this steam version next month just to play ranked.

  • @trentonwright8165
    @trentonwright8165 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video man! I’m subscribing

  • @BlackSmithWolves
    @BlackSmithWolves ปีที่แล้ว

    WOW the amount of luck you had with the dice this game is actually insane lol

  • @Ў-Бастер-Ў
    @Ў-Бастер-Ў ปีที่แล้ว

    Это выглядит хорошо !

  • @CianWolffensperger
    @CianWolffensperger ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice content, though the opponent was playing pretty badly.

  • @Harbringe
    @Harbringe 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Winning as the Axis in the 42 variant is tough , simply put you need to take some risky options and hope they work and that doesnt even count that Russia because it goes before Getmany can thwart those options and Britain can thwart Japan , which is ahistorical.

  • @sirundying
    @sirundying 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the AI is so trash at this game

  • @EdinProfa
    @EdinProfa 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You are not too good a player, are you?

  • @mckynleewilson8543
    @mckynleewilson8543 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’ve played better axis players in wood level