@@EastToWestTCGthere’s no point playing best of one. There is no best of 1 event. There’s no variety because you loose if your not playing red as well as no sideboards. I mean I want explorer content but not best of one games. I gain no information from them
@@themtgmaster3425 I suppose it prepares one for more best of one. From the perspective of those traditional best of three sideboard enjoyers, definitely a niche format. It appears that your problem with the format is that it lacks the versatility of the sideboard transformation mechanic. Each deck has to be finely tuned for the current meta, like red aggro, or it gets blown out time and time again.
It warms the heart to see something like this
Man's never played Blue.
He has no idea what it's like to play Blue
No he's just covert about it
High risk, high reward 😂😂😂... unless this happens.
I've been muffed at least once keeping the same hand XD
one time I got 8 sequencial lands I don't even know how I got to the fifth.
Best of 1 is pointless
Why is it pointless?
@@EastToWestTCGthere’s no point playing best of one. There is no best of 1 event. There’s no variety because you loose if your not playing red as well as no sideboards. I mean I want explorer content but not best of one games. I gain no information from them
Best of one is a format that many apparently enjoy, even if it is not your cup of tea.
@@nicodemuseam if I’m spending time doing something I at least wanna get better at the game. Best of one prepares you for nothing
@@themtgmaster3425
I suppose it prepares one for more best of one.
From the perspective of those traditional best of three sideboard enjoyers, definitely a niche format.
It appears that your problem with the format is that it lacks the versatility of the sideboard transformation mechanic. Each deck has to be finely tuned for the current meta, like red aggro, or it gets blown out time and time again.