Wargame: Red Dragon Deck Crash Course Episode 3: USA

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 68

  • @ronaldp7573
    @ronaldp7573 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    As a veteran of the 82nd Airborne, I feel personally attacked that Light Riflemen do not have shock training.
    I have stopped eating baguettes in protest.

    • @jmdibonaventuro
      @jmdibonaventuro ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A bit of an odd protest method, but I support it

  • @alexanderrose1556
    @alexanderrose1556 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Should play this deck in a game

  • @putin1878
    @putin1878 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    This deck can have some improvement in my opinion. Definitely the Anti-Plane options are quite fragile here and many people will not manage. Hawk PIP III is a great addition to the Upveted Patriot. For that you remove Stingers. Also the Helo Cobra is outclassed in the intended role by Recon variant. You should consider taking Super Cobra for extra SEAD given the heavy Air focus. Other than that, this was a great Crash.

    • @MrErdem95
      @MrErdem95 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Super Cobra is a must have. Probably 2nd most broken helo in the game after Longbow. Russian helos suck, they take ages to aim and you need to get 2 helos at the same. Neither one can do much solo. Whereas longbow solo can do a lot yes, Super Cobra not so much but you only need a cheap recon helo to help spot stuff.

  • @sugoisukhoi
    @sugoisukhoi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    i am once again asking for one win with every nation stream

    • @MrGhettosmack
      @MrGhettosmack 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      1 win with every nation and specialization.

    • @tpeterchoi
      @tpeterchoi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrGhettosmack that would be remarkable

  • @1adamuk
    @1adamuk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Nice video. I might argue the F/A-18C is preferable to the the A10 Thunderbolt in team / late game when the AA net is stronger and there are likely more ASFs. It's just more survivable because faster and better ECM.

    • @dondelchulia3189
      @dondelchulia3189 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agreed+bigger maps for teams a-10 is usually seen for 20+ seconds before it’s on target

  • @Silverraptorvideos
    @Silverraptorvideos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice! Glad to see my assessment in the thunderbolt wasn't unwarranted after all!

  • @aaarre7987
    @aaarre7987 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Keep up the good work man :)

  • @rizkijunir6762
    @rizkijunir6762 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you

  • @ko1078
    @ko1078 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Would definately dump the Chaparral for the stinger humvee. yeah you ditch out the range but thats what you have the pivads/hawk for but it bumps you up in speed, crazy accuracy and extra shots. Oh and its 30% cheaper.

  • @systemot
    @systemot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You should mention in the video whether the decks you are building for this series are for 1v1 or team games. This is a great series you are making

    • @RazzmannWG
      @RazzmannWG  3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You would not need to adjust much for team games, and generally I mention picks for bigger games (see the tanks or planes part).

  • @baus2600
    @baus2600 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    thank you so muchhh!!1

  • @MrHeavy466
    @MrHeavy466 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    14:01 I just realized: the front of the prowler looks like a big schnoz. It is literally sniffing out the AA.

  • @jerryzhang958
    @jerryzhang958 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for the deck! Rookie really appreciated.

  • @RestedInsomniac
    @RestedInsomniac 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can someone explain why the riflemen base is preferable to the riflemen '90 for infantry spam? They have the M113A3 for transport and the 90's come with a much upgraded AT weapon for only 5 points. I get that we want infantry spam at low cost, but the AT4's much better accuracy and AP seem feasible at 15 points. I'd love to hear a counter-argument.

    • @butter_nation
      @butter_nation 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      well us infantry are not strong in fighting but their vehicles are. Even those 5 transport spam can overwhelm even the well train shock however you gonna need alot of them and 5 point for better anti tank alone might no be that cost effective with the gun you have ,spam 4 group of 4 stack rifleman with m113 is 240 and rifle 90 is 320 so 80 point cheaper (25 percent cheaper) also this is US general so slot quite limited. however i run with another one with IFV . In short we save extra point to run something eles.

  • @incompetentgaming8400
    @incompetentgaming8400 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    No Marines or Delta Force? Any reason why other than the most obvious one(your playstyle)?

    • @RazzmannWG
      @RazzmannWG  3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Ahh I wanted to mention Marines. They are decent if you need some allround infantry. Though unless you expect some townfights, you'll be perfectly fine with Riflemen spam.

  • @dylanmeier2473
    @dylanmeier2473 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the tips! God bless

  • @Domhnall_A_Ghalltachd
    @Domhnall_A_Ghalltachd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Why do you think the longbow is the most broken unit in the game out of interest? Because of the fire and forget? In most games I see them they are quite easy to counter.

    • @RazzmannWG
      @RazzmannWG  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes, fire and forget coupled with the 0.2s aim time on helicopters.

    • @themadtacoeatingfool5228
      @themadtacoeatingfool5228 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’ve personally never had a problem killling longbows if you just keep your transports alive and move them with your tanks when pushing or send them out as a screen with aa when attacking a longbow it will get the job done.

    • @Domhnall_A_Ghalltachd
      @Domhnall_A_Ghalltachd 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RazzmannWG OK thanks razz

    • @michaelscalese3142
      @michaelscalese3142 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@themadtacoeatingfool5228 I micro the living fuck out of my longbows, and im bad at micro in general, it can destroy armies if used properly.

  • @icy3-1
    @icy3-1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Are the US Marines worthy substitutes for regular Riflemen?

    • @RazzmannWG
      @RazzmannWG  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      no they fulfill a different role and are a lot more self sufficient
      regular Riflemen are just there for spam and meatshielding

    • @icy3-1
      @icy3-1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RazzmannWG Duly noted, thanks. I'm currently trying to refurbish my infantry lineup for my US General deck and had trouble deciding between Marines and Riflemen xF

  • @HuntsmanBG
    @HuntsmanBG 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey Razz, just getting back into Wargame after a year and surprised to hear that superheavies aren’t must-haves anymore. What’s the reason people are moving away from them?

    • @josephahner3031
      @josephahner3031 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      If I had to guess itd be because they can be countered relatively easily and are a huge investment in a 1v1. They are not very mistake friendly.

  • @Allen-fe1nq
    @Allen-fe1nq 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How did you get that American Flag decal on your M1A1 tank?

  • @kannan159
    @kannan159 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    is this for 1v1 or team games?

  • @uncletimo6059
    @uncletimo6059 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    F/A 18 Hornet, the one with AT missile, is better than the slow thunderbolt meme plane.... imo.
    Fast, 1000kph, good range on the missile. In, out, done.

  • @staryoun1
    @staryoun1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If i lose 1 partiot, i lose

  • @lewishamilton9251
    @lewishamilton9251 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    where did m113a2 go?

  • @pjseebach
    @pjseebach 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    why cant i see some of the things your showing like the m1a2?

    • @RazzmannWG
      @RazzmannWG  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did you make sure to choose USA or NORAD with no restrictions?

  • @blitzmaniak4336
    @blitzmaniak4336 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    8:32 why you taking About blufor at And not About redfor at

    • @RazzmannWG
      @RazzmannWG  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because blue vs blue is also a match up. And I did mention redfor AT (Bumbar), however the key AP values here are 25 and 26 and most of the weapons with these values are found on the NATO side.

  • @afonsoneto5296
    @afonsoneto5296 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    V-150 gang

  • @barnmaddo
    @barnmaddo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No M551 ACAV? A scout tank that can two shot infantry squads seemed like a lot of fun to me.
    In hindsight I don't see many infantry squads charging across open terrain, without heavier tank support which the M551 ACAV would easily die to.
    Edit: Also learned the CEV has a minimum range, less than it's effective firing range inside the woods. So it's main gun is useless in the woods.

    • @shane21882
      @shane21882 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      im having fun with the m60 starship tank or mbt 70 for fighting infantry in forests and firesupport

  • @goscniedzielnypiatek3555
    @goscniedzielnypiatek3555 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How i can paste this deck to game?

    • @RazzmannWG
      @RazzmannWG  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      There is an import button at the bottom of the deck menu.

  • @baus2600
    @baus2600 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a question Raz, whats the best counter to a mass helo rush??

    • @nogodsnomasters7669
      @nogodsnomasters7669 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Cltr-Alt-Delete

    • @chummykomi5224
      @chummykomi5224 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      you need some cheap AA spread around to bait enemy missiles(like some trucks), because your enemy generally will not micro their heli when helo rushing, then use your main AA to take their most expensive helos first using the gap and the chance their helo are auto attacking your cheap units

    • @irfanzainuddin472
      @irfanzainuddin472 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Those 20pts vulcans are the answer ;)

    • @josephahner3031
      @josephahner3031 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      20pt vulcans, zptu-4, any unit that has decent anti helo range and an absurd rate of fire.

  • @lewishamilton9251
    @lewishamilton9251 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    you need to up your graphic settings for this kind of videos

  • @homefront1999
    @homefront1999 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    See, I find that I like to use the MBT-70 for the spam forest role. The 5 HE plus the Autocannon can do great work against infantry and transports. The M1 is fine. But never seem to be that effective and slow at the killing role compared.

  • @ccuuttww
    @ccuuttww 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Infantry tab is weak if u fight against BMPT BTRT any shock train infantry u are in trouble

  • @crissmiller25
    @crissmiller25 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    hey. do UDSSR next please. great video

  • @rhylsaldar
    @rhylsaldar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    My US deck Full M113 !

  • @keqiluo4147
    @keqiluo4147 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why not Norad

  • @incompetentgaming8400
    @incompetentgaming8400 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    NORAD next pls

    • @RazzmannWG
      @RazzmannWG  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Not gonna do that until very late probably as it is so similar to (and generally weaker than) USA.

  • @irfanzainuddin472
    @irfanzainuddin472 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Regular infantry spam is not that good, easily stunned and killed by planes, or elite infantries. Unless they got good cover, from other players which is rare in WRD nowadays.

    • @josephahner3031
      @josephahner3031 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Idk about that. Regular infantry spam works if they have good transport options and proper fire support. Base rifle spam has 3 components. Riflemen, M113A3, and base Abrams/MBT 70. Without any one of these components it is mediocre but combined is brutal in forests. Less good in towns but small towns can be won with riflemen and good mortar play. if you're expecting a big town grind bring Marines or Deltas.

    • @irfanzainuddin472
      @irfanzainuddin472 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@josephahner3031 It can, but as i said, it requires a good cover to work.

  • @thekingsguard8874
    @thekingsguard8874 ปีที่แล้ว

    like the video. i just build WAY differently than you.

  • @jefferyrutherford1471
    @jefferyrutherford1471 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    SEND STEAM FRIEND REQUEST

  • @jefferyrutherford1471
    @jefferyrutherford1471 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks! for deck build ill see how it works add me on steam whats your steam