I received this camera from a heritage and never really used it. Felt heavy and I already had a very nice camera. Until one day my main camera broke and used the D700 for a portrait shoot. I was blown away by the magical quality. Very different than the boring expensive modern mirrorless camera's. Right now the D700 is my main camera and I got it for free.
My D700 journey: I owned and loved one for years, but thought I need to upgrade to the latest "state of the art" cameras, so I got a Z6 and sold my D700. You know the saying "you don't really know what you got 'til it's gone" - absolutely applies to the D700. I regretted selling it so darn much after 2 months that I thought I might be better off with the successor - the D780. Gosh was I wrong, because it is basically a Z6 in DSLR body. Same boring image look, same weird skin colors that you can't get close to what the D700 did, no matter how hard you try, you won't get the same "magic". So I sold both the Z6 and the D780 to get my beloved beauty back and I did. And OMG am I happy now again. I got a totally unrealistically great deal on a MINT D700 with 35.000 clicks - it's looks and operates like new. You would never guess it is 10 years old! I use it professionally and don't let ANYBODY tell you that 12MP is not enough to do professional work or huge prints! They even did a test with Peter McKinnon where they compared huge prints done with a 100MP and a 12MP camera and you just couldn't tell the difference. Also modern interpolation softwares like Gigapixel AI can upscale your images up to 8 times the original size with almost no loss and sometimes they look even better than the original ones. Get a D700 NOW! The shutter counts on used ones will only rise from here on!
Thanks for sharing your journey! I think at some point we all encounter the "one that got away" camera. For many it's the D700 :) The cure for G.A.S. ! And you're right, modern software gets better and better so the low megapixel count becomes increasingly moot. Hope your shutter goes to a million!
@@lensvana Thanks man! It definitely is a cure for G.A.S. - I hav absolutely no desire to get another camera for photo-only purposes. And you really don't need anything else than a D700 or a D3 (which is basically the same sensor and processing with a slightly different reading algorithm than the D700 - so the handling and the images are pretty much the same).
consider yourself lucky and a good move....if your old 700 had way MORE clicks than the one you got now, it was timing and a blessing that you scored a deal!
I've just bought one, but I did see one on mpb, and it had a shutter count of 1,280,000 😮 yes just over a million. I didn't buy it, but it does show how they can go on 🤗👍
I have three of these. Got the money for a pair of D750s, tried both and stuck with this one, it's perfect for my work. My main (now retired) one has almost 500k clicks with the original shutter, it's immortal
I bought mine back in 2009 and it is by far the best camera I have ever used. I Own the D80, D300S, D800E, D500, D7000 and 2 D700 and 5 fujiflm XH1, Gfx 50, XPro 3, T20, X 100. There's nothing out there that feels and render images like the d700. I can look at different photo sites and can pick out a d700 image most of the time. there's just something different and unique to this camera, about how it renders images in a good way.
That's awesome Jesse - and you have quite the collection there! I know folks who have sold the D700, regretted it, and ended up buying another on the used market. It's just a perfect balance of everything
I bought the D3 & D300 in 2008, plus owning some Canon DSLR, M4/3 and Z6 and as far as color science concern, I like my Leica Q just as much as the D3. Now, I may have to consider the SL2 or M10 series more seriously.
I feel image quality (color sine, resolution, aesthetics) are all subjective, and you can argue that preference of the majority becomes standard, but I still think it is subjective. With this in mind I got the D800 as my first full frame, and later on my hobby progress into collecting vintage cameras and got myself a D700. I think I still like my D800 more because this is the first full frame I used and maybe got spoiled by the features of the D800. The resolution alone unlocks a lot of potential for capturing photos whether intended or unintended, and intended because you know you can do something with the crop, and the dynamic range on the D800 is so wide, it give an amature a lot of room to correct mistakes in post. This gives a lot of freedom when you know what your camera is capable off. With the D700, a lot of the features you get from a high resolution and high dynamic range becomes "limited", and there for challenging to me. So I use the D700 to challenge myself to be a better photographer. It challenges you to take a photo correctly the first time(although the DR on the D700 is no slouch either), and not use post as a crutch.
Lately I bought D700 used in Mint Condition (no scratches) and tried out myself compare to my Z6II, Fuji XT2, 5DMK2, 30D that I own. Let me tell you the way D700 render images, the color comes out are very Unique Outstanding that I can't find from others cameras I own. They are so Beautiful, are Not like Modern mirrorless cameras that are crazy Sharp. So Don't Be A FOOL yourself and say D700 only has 12 megapixels that's not enough. It's more than enough to print out 11x14" portfolio and larger size my friends...
I’ve used one of these professionally for several years and would never part with it. Weddings, local news, sport. It can do it all. The colours out of this things are genuinely special and I can spot the photos taken with the D700 compared to my D750. As for the 12mp sensor, the reality is that’s more than enough for most people. I shot a lot of football (soccer!) and as well as being used in print, I’ve had a team use some of my images on 6 feet high posters in my city and honestly they looked great. Most people don’t need a fraction of the features (or megapixels!) of the new cameras being churned out today for thousands of dollars. Working photographers’ equipment has to earn its keep and for most, spending $5,000 on the latest body makes no financial sense in the current photographic market. If you can’t make great photos with a D700, the problem is with you, not the camera.
Had mine for 2 months....my first ever DSLR and I gotta say this thing takes the most beautiful photos. Paid $700 AUD. Shutter count 32,000. Best money I’ve ever spent.
@@StartreckTuhello bro can you tell me about shutter count and what to check before buying this camera...... Someone is selling it here in my city about 200$
I have 2 of these legends. Best money that I've ever spent. Panasonic sensor, just brilliant!! Who needs all those MP's. 12 MP is just fine if you know what's what.
Own one since 2009. Best camera I ever had. Even the used D850 I bought only just recently (which is from 2018) does not come close in build quality. Nikon threw everything into the D700 they had back then to make professional photographers happy with a full frame body without integrated vertical grip. I don't think they ever produced a better DSLR in their time. Done tons of professional shootings with it.
CORRECTION: I said that the D700 doesn't work with AF-P lenses. My mistake, it's compatible with FX (Full Frame) AF-P lenses, but not DX (Crop) AF-P lenses. Full compatibility info here: www.nikonimgsupport.com/eu/BV_article?articleNo=000035705&configured=1&lang=en_GB TL;DR the only two quirks when working with AF-P FX lenses: - The camera does not offer the "Manual focus ring in AF mode" custom setting for enabling/disabling focus ring operation in autofocus mode. - If the standby timer is allowed to expire, the focus position will change when the timer is restarted, requiring refocusing. Specifying longer standby times is recommended for manual focus photography (remote photography, fixed photography using a tripod, interval timer photography, etc.) and in other situations in which the shutter may not be released immediately after focusing.
i bougt this camera in 2019 around $350 from my friend including 80-200 2.8 lens and $80 maintenance/cleaning i think one of the most best deal ive ever made
Well, if it's any indication...when I started using my D700's (I had three) for weddings, I sold my Hasselblads! I miss them just for the "feel" of using them, but my workflow became so much easier. I didn't have to process and scan all of my negatives or change film like a race car driver on the job. LOL
When I was shooting weddings and other events, I bought a D3 and a D700 in 2008 as a backup. I now own several newer cameras and they don’t compare with richer colors and low light photography. (D750, Z7 and D800) Friends scoffed that the D700 only had one card slot and a 95% viewfinder. Both complaints were nonsense if you are a true photographer. .
@@lensvana Who cares about the 1 slot.My CF card is 6 years inside my D700 and never had a single fail. About the vf.If someone can't see the shot or frame it the 100% coverage is not going to save them. www.flickr.com/photos/191035018@N07/
People complain that the D700 only has 1 card slot, my D700 will be 13 years old in 2022 and I've never had a CF card or card slot go bad but I'm careful when I insert the card.
I have over 250K on one of my D700's shutters and it's still chugging along. I keep buying newer camera bodies and coming back to my trusty old D700. Love those bodies.
I miss mine, unfortunately it did die, and now I use a d810 (since 2014) as my Nikon camera... One thing i love about these camera's: battery life is ridiculous. If you forget to turn off the camera you still don't get unpleasant surprises 2 days later. From time to time I check how cheap these go. It's amazing!
I bought one 6 months ago and love it, I was lucky enough to get one with less than 2000 clicks for $425 from a camera store. I was already shooting Nikon so I have all types of lenses to use on this camera and it loves older manual lenses.
It is STILL top of the line!! It's a good file with plenty to work with. I like my Fuji fine, but, as a portrait photographer, this one takes the cake.
Bought mine in 2009, just sold it the other week and thinking of getting a Z6 or something in that range... But now watching this videos about D700 get me emotional...this was by far the best piece of photo equipment I ever tried. So.. maybe.. I'll buy it again someday...
My D700 has 339,000 exposures now. Not sure when it will die but I will probably get another one if it does. The CCD in this camera is fantastic. Less noise than my D7200 up to ISO 3200
Nice review! I gave my first D700 to my son and I’ve since bought 2 more, each with under 9,000 shutter actuations. The colors are as magical as the D4
I shoot mostly fuji now and sold or gave away my Nikons but kept lenses. Then I saw this camera almost new (1500 shots) with grip and a 50mm f1.5 AFS lens in the $600 range. I went for it. I am not selling. The best kit I have bought on eBay.
Can also recommend the AF 70-210 f4-5.6 on this, it's so sharp for a cheap zoom and at the long end even has a somewhat decent bokeh, and it's only $100. Push-pull zoom isn't for everyone though. If you can get the D version, it's even better, very fast focus.
I bought my D700 second hand directly from Japan seven or eight years ago and it was/is in pristine condition with a very low shutter count around 11K. It's small and heavy and it's a camera that's staying with me for life.
Great review. I've owned my D700 for 3 years now and everything you said is true. It is a bit of a beast but the photos I get from it are fantastic. With some good f2.8 glass it gets heavy, add the grip on it and it's neck breaker in weight. I also have a D200 and loved the pro body style with all the controls easily accessible, which lead me to getting the D700 plus it's full frame.
Good review, one point though on the sensor low light, some professionals tested it against the Z6 mirrorless sensor and found out the noise on the D700 is much more pleasing than the Z6, and also the colors on the D700 is unmatched, sometimes newer sensors not necessarily better.
Thanks, yep there's something to be said about how these older sensors handled noise. The less "digital" the noise appears, the better. Just one of the reasons why the D700 remains so popular today
With todays software like Gigapixel AI. It really makes the D700 a great camera to carry today.... it's a perfect pro camera. With gigapixel and sharpening software you can get output that rivals the D850 and beyond all with a 12 megapixel sensor.
Very true! I'm looking forward to those Gigapixel AI algorithms becoming even more widespread; eventually even free software will be taking advantage of this tech as it develops. Breathes new life into those 12mp images (and cameras).
I shoot with Fujis now, but I still have 2X D700 with battery grip. I love this D700 and I will never part with it along with all my awesome Nikon lenses. One of the few epic, classic cameras ever.
Used to have a d700, loved it from the moment i got my hands on it. I used it for weddings, paired with a 50mm 1.8D, it was lovely. I recently switched to a d3, which i got for about the same price. The d3 is amazing in low light, i can go up to 5000 iso without any problems, when on the d700 i wouldn't go above 1600. Both are great cameras, but i'd recommend getting a d3, it's a workhorse
did a dogshoot last week in the woods with 70-200 2.8 VR1 at ISO5000 (for the run shoot) and DxO Photolab renders it without noise :) I own 5 D700 bodies, my first was a new one in 2009, my last second hand one only had 50 clicks! I own a D3s too now; I like those 6 tanks !
Bought mine 1 month after release in 2008 and still use it professionally as a backup. I like combining it with film because it doesn't have the clinical resolution of my d850. It has worked flawlessly for 25 years. My F6 film camera manufactured around 2016, they made that film camera til 2020, should out live me. These cameras are not beasts or tanks, they were build to be reliable and long lasting. Yes, only 12 mp but if you are not printing and only viewing on line, you only need less than 8 mp.
The D700 is a legend for sure, as well as the Nikon F100 (35mm Film) SLR. I'd wish, all gear nowadays would being build like the D700. Some are really plasticky. PS: I do use this 28-70/3.5-4.5D since my F90x (1995!). It was the Kitlens for the F90. It was also *the* Kitlens for the F100 (1999) and the 2nd was the 28-105/3.5-4.5 Lens, that tells a story. I have 4 copies of it. Also the better, albeit way bulky 28-70/2.8 ED.
My first full frame DSLR. Bought mine when it came out (after D70) and will shoot with it until it dies. What a camera. Next will be probably the D850. For me it’s a better feeling than shoot with mirrorless.
I think the rise in popularity in these "old" cameras (its not even close to the age of my Nikon FE!) is that people are getting fed up and disillusioned with the current state of the camera world; camera makers and review sites are all the hype. Few people seem interested in photography any more. I've just picked one of these up in good condition for a little over £300 with 5000 clicks (arriving today 🤞). I intend to slap a 50mm on it and that's it. I honestly see it becoming my daily camera.
@@lensvana Yes it was. I was looking at a couple with around 45-50,000 clicks, and then I saw this one! Snapped it up very quick. Bought in Good condition but looks like new. I've not taken it out yet, but it feels amazing and the few "around the house" photos I've taken look gorgeous, even if the subjects were a little rubbish. 😊 The strap and charger were still packaged in original packaging 🤷♂️
Great post! The D700 is amazing. I often shoot with a 50mm f1.8D. Sometimes I use a 28-105D. This my favorite digital camera. I love the the user interface because it reminds of my old Nikon film cameras. You can change all the important settings without digging thru the menu.
I bought a D700 Body for £300 and a 50MM F1.8 for £166. It's excellent and for under £500, you get a pro camera with sharp lens, it's great. 12MP is enough for A4 prints and instagram, which look great.
I bought a D700 body last week for £209. It’s a considerable move up from my old D100. I have already bought a few Nikon prime lenses: 24mm 50mm… and, of course, a portrait lens 85mm. I am really very excitedly looking forward to learning to use this camera to it’s maximum potential.
It is indeed such a superb camera. My first DSLR and I still use it and love it. I am even thinking of getting a second one even if I already have a D500 and a D850, in order to put on my vintage manual lenses. Thank you for your very nice true video.
Thank you Flora for your kind words! Now is a good time to pick these up on the used market I think (good deals on eBay too). I think those vintage AI/AI-s lenses would look right at home on a D700 :)
I have several vintage lenses that I have used on it, they work great with the non CPU lens setup in the menu. I even took a vintage Tokina 35mm f2 lens with me when I went to Japan two years ago, got some great night street shots with that lens. D700 is not the best travel camera these days but I wanted the best photos I could get.
Excellent camera - excellent video. When I was able to afford a used D700 and started shooting with it, it was the first time ever that I did NOT feel that digital cameras were very inferior to the Nikon film cameras I owned. All the D3 era Nikons are fabulous. I also have a D3X which I love for portraits. Some people say it's no good because of it's poor ISO capabilities and low frames per second - so the D3X gets dismissed and passed over. if you don't need low light shooting and you don't need high frames per sec, then the D3X is another great alternative 12 year old choice for a 24 Megapixel Nikon portrait camera.
Thanks! The D3/D700 period was truly a golden era for Nikon and it's amazing how affordable these cameras are today (as the world rushes to mirrorless). You're right, the D3X doesn't get talked about enough - I'm sure there are plenty of pros still getting world class results with it today.
I got my D700 as soon as they came on the market. Bought the grip, wifi device for live image review on laptop and a load of lenses. It's been great, but the weight can start to feel tiring after a few hours, especially with the grip and a 70-200mm on it. I must be honest and say, yes, it produces 'film like' images, but I always preferred Canons more digital look. I've just ordered a Z5 with FTZ to see how mirrorless feels and shoots. May keep the 700 as a backup but honestly, the thought of lugging all that extra weight around does not appeal to a casual amateur
I feel image quality (color sine, resolution, aesthetics) are all subjective, and you can argue that preference of the majority becomes standard, but I still think it is subjective. With this in mind I got the D800 as my first full frame, and later on my hobby progress into collecting vintage cameras and got myself a D700. I think I still like my D800 more because this is the first full frame I used and maybe got spoiled by the features of the D800. The resolution alone unlocks a lot of potential for capturing photos whether intended or unintended, and intended because you know you can do something with the crop, and the dynamic range on the D800 is so wide, it give an amature a lot of room to correct mistakes in post. This gives a lot of freedom when you know what your camera is capable off. With the D700, a lot of the features you get from a high resolution and high dynamic range becomes "limited", and there for challenging to me. So I use the D700 to challenge myself to be a better photographer. It challenges you to take a photo correctly the first time(although the DR on the D700 is no slouch either), and not use post as a crutch.
Thanks for sharing! There's a lot to be said for getting it right in-camera - it's a great habit to pick up (sometimes I get too used to the insane shadow recovery of modern sensors).
That would be kickass but sadly I don't think we'll see that - they are super focused on pumping out Z system cameras and lenses now before Canon/Sony take 90%+ of the full frame market share
Preach. The only thing I’d want is the newer AF system and an EXPEED 6. The problem is that although Nikon do have all the coding for the D700, the sensor no longer exists.
Just got a D700 yesterday and it's in rough shape. The memory card door is broken (needs replacement), the grip near the AF is gone, and all the grips on the sides needs replacing as they are coming off. Some guy had it in his storage for 7 years, never touched it. We slapped some AA's into the battery grip and it came to life like nothing. All for $150. Sure, it'll need some serious DIY TLC, but it was a deal I couldn't pass up.
Received my replacement D700 yesterday with 7700 shutter count. Always regretted selling my original D700 a few years ago. The only camera I have missed out of all I have owned. It weighs a ton but I love it. Some of the best pictures I have taken with this camera. It will sit with my mirror less Z FC I acquired too.
I got my D700 in 2011 eleven for about $2300. I'm still using it in 2022 it has about 85,000+ actuations on it. I have heard of shutter counts as high as 336k+, so it's a tank. Coupled with the 28--300 mm lens it's magic... that lens was made for that body. Though the D3s and the D4s look mighty tasty I would take another one of these (or two) in a heartbeat. I love this camera.
Don that's a great story, glad to see someone else still rocking the D700. That shutter is a survivor! Haven't tried the 28-300mm but hear it's an amazing performer even on higher res cameras. D4 for business, D700 for pleasure
@@lensvana, the D700m has never gotten the praise or recognition it deserves. There are those that would turn up their nose and keep walking. That's OK because an amazing camera can be had for a GOOD price.
I love my D700. Bought it new when it came out and I´m never going to sell it. Also have a D800, a D200 and a D7000. I like them all, but I guess the 700 is my favorite. Something about the look of the files that is more film-like to my mind, particularly in low light. Could be the larger pixels compared to the 800, maybe. Naturally, the 800 excels when cropping is necessary.
Thanks for sharing! There's something to be said for big, "clean" pixels if that makes any sense. When properly exposed, images from the D700 simply shine
it is a great camera, almost perfect had not 95% of viewfinder coverage. The D300 offers quite the same, nowadays for 150 euros (viewfinder 100% coverage on the d300)
I agree, ISO 6400 is the limit for the D700. It also depends on the lighting. I've shot at ISO 3200 in bright consistant lighting & at snapshot size you can't tell the difference. Your RAW editor of choice can make a difference as well; Lightroom is just not good at noise reduction & sharpness in general, I use DxO Photolab & the quality of processing is remarkable. A great portraiture camera but can also produce great landscape photos as well.
I bought one mid year have not had much time to get out I use it but it is great, mostly taken product shots and a few sunsets love the colours it gives, If you think the D700 is heavy try lugging my F5 about.
It is a very pro feeling camera. All exposure settings and focus ,drive modes etc have dials and or buttons. Very natural and contrasty image rendering straight out of camera which is pleasing. Also, the menu system is consistent with more modern following of Nikons which gives that consistency. I think the biggest downside for me against the D3 was the inefficiency of the battery and view finder coverage being 90% or so which can throw you off and sometimes requires more work like cropping in post if you didn't have the shot framed exact. The D3S in my opinion maximized this sensor's ability although I don't feel the ergonomics was as comfortable as the D700. I also wasn't a fan of the overly soft/spongey feel of the directional control button. If they only could have carried the image character into the newer cameras like the D800 as it was very similar handling wise just a bit better imo but it lost its secret sauce in image quality.
I ordered my D700 and MB-D10 after the Nikon announcement in December 2008, it was on back ordered so I didn't receive it until February 2009. It's January 2021 it works perfectly! It is well built and has never required a trip to Nikon for repair. I wished Nikon would have upgraded it during its production run to a 16mp D700s, that said it sits in my camera bag alongside my D600 or D800. I don't see a need to upgrade to the Z5, Z6II or Z7II in 2021. Don't let the 12mp fool you, you can make awesome 8x10's or 11x14.
Right on Mark, congrats on getting the D700 before most of us :) And I'm with you, Nikon made so many amazing DSLRs that I'm not tempted at all by the mirrorless offerings. 12mp is a great filesize and just right for typical prints.
@@lensvana The F5 shutter is a work of art, I bought the D700 to develop my skills without wasting film I have film, but once I can see what works and what does not I can be more confident of getting at least half of the film roll worth taking but yeah the F5 is precise in it’s action I can’t even hear the film advance just the winder turning, I might add, comparing the size between a D700 and say a D3, D4, with the vertical grip attached it’s actually bigger and heavier than the F5, a 12 megapixel iPhone 13 can take great pictures but it is definitely satisfying being able to change the settings, now I am after an aps-c but because I have a Minolta Alpha/Dynax/ Maxxum 7 and a handful of pro Minolta glass so I am looking to a Sony A77 for that, also I’m not sure what currency you are talking about but I got both the D700 and the F5 for 500 Australian Dollars and I verified the shutter count today as 13% so yeah gives me a reason to get up and leave the house in the early morning
@@aural_supremacy Prices are all over the place these days but you got a great deal there! That D700 is going to keep going for a while, perfect companion for photographic walks. Hey who knows maybe used DSLR prices may start creeping up again if they start getting the "vintage" appeal that film cameras enjoy.
I think you have one of the best camera + lens combinations possible - a truly professional setup. Nikkor 24-70mm F2.8 is part of the Nikon "Holy Trinity" of lenses!
I have a D90 that is only 12MP and it takes incredible pictures. I also have a D7200 that I use mostly now. It is fantastic but I still love my D90. I want a full frame camera and am considering either a D700 or a D610. I would consider a D750 but am afraid of getting one without all the factory recall fixes. What would you recommend?
I think a D610 would be the best choice - the low light performance alone will blow you away. For 12mp fun in good light you can always bust out the D90. PS. You can punch in a D750 serial number into the Nikon tool: nikon.tfaforms.net/215 (Service Advisory) to see if it was affected.
I have a few cameras... but about 2 years ago, my uncle gave me one of his... a D700. I didn't touch it until a couple of days ago and now kicking myself for not even using it. I fell in love with it right away.
It's a D3 but smaller, and a bit more slanted to image quality than speed. It was in the transition period when people still had all their film lenses which had to be good because in camera corrections were new and nonexistent with film. The latest firmware updates this. The Panasonic sensor renders images in a way that has not been surpassed, even today. Get a good one and you will never regret it.
I recently attended an airshow as media.....had my publishers D500 and my D700......when the Blue Angels started to perform, I did alot of shooting. I then came home, uploaded my images and I seen something so awesome.......crisp, detailed, sharp as shit, and colors were great.....I went to 'details' to see the specs on the photo, guess what...............camera: nikon d700.
About the fps, you will achieve up to 7fps only by using an enel4a (d3 battery) with the bl3 battery door cover, and with the 12.1 megapixel pixel pitch you can print 24x30 posters, ive done it and they look perfect
I prefer my D700 over my A7r3 haha. Should have got the D700 first. I didnt expect to love it so much. So, because of that I carry my D700 everywhere as my daily driver camera. I love it!!
I got the D700 when it just came to market. Fabulous camera. Mine unfortunately got stolen along with al my lenses. I’ve used quite some cameras overtime but the D700 was my favorite. I just picked one up from Ebay in top mint condition with a shutter count below 9000. It should arrive within a few days.
I love dslrs for their toughness but mirrorless is no slouch either. Depends on what type your are looking at. I know people some people disregard mirrorless. But it was the same during the digital transition era
Recently bought a beautiful unmarked one for £400 15000 shots - great to use, waiting for the pandemic to pass so I can use it to it's full potential. Perfect with my D lenses. Heavy - yes, but I like a camera that feels solid, and has a comfortable feel as this does.
Sorry to say the sample images don't do justice for the D700.. I agree it's best for portrait shooting.. Landscape it works well if you adjust the camera properly.. I have no problem with high ISO.. I've shot concerts at high ISO with once again no problem.. The noise on the D700 has a film quality to it.. Legends Never Die.. Shoot your but off with the D700.. ✌️😎👍
Brilliant video, you're right about that shutter sound. Just got a d700. I cannot believe the quality of this camera and I'm a Canon user. I'm currently using it with a Soviet Mir-24h 35mm f/2.0. I was going to use the Mir-24h as a stop gap lens until I could get a 50mm 1.4D or 50mm 1.8g but this camera has made me love the Mir again. I'm having trouble deciding whether to ge a 50mm 1.4D or 50mm 1.8g. I like the fact that I will be able to use the 50mm 1.4D on every other camera I own via adapter including my metabones speedbooster where it will be an f/1.0 lens. Though the 50mm 1.8g looks amazing and will weather seal the setup.
What a coincidence - I also picked up the Mir-24N recently (mine came with an M42 mount adapter). I've only used the 50mm F1.8G and it's such great value that I don't hesitate to recommend it - especially in minty used condition.
@@lensvana Thanks Lensvana, I've order a 50mm 1.8g. It looks like a very good lens. Certainly better than the Canon 50mm STM. The Mir-24n really shines on the D700. I bought it 3 years ago as an APSC normal lens. It cost me £60 and was bought from someone in the UK. I was thinking of selling it as I now have a Sony A7 and FE 50mm f1.8. I'm glad I didn't.
@@lensvana Thanks Lensvana, I've ordered a 50mm f1.8g. It looks like a very good 50, certainly better than the Canon 50mm STM. I got the Mir-24n three years ago as an APSC normal lens. Paid £60 for it from someone in the UK on ebay. I was thinking of selling my Mir-24h as I have a Sony A7 and FE 50mm f1.8 but I'm glad I didn't.
@@DryadMachine I think you'll enjoy the 1.8G! Even today folks are using it on mirrorless cameras with the FTZ adapter - it's just such great value and holds up to any sensor out there. That Mir-24, yeah, I'm going to hold on to mine too (they're not getting any cheaper). It's an especially fun lens to use up close (24 cm min. focusing distance). I could see it especially popular with food photographers.
@@lensvana You weren't wrong about the 1.8G. I got one today and took some wide open landscape test shots and was blown away. It was too dark to stop down but I bet it is razor sharp by f4. The best 50 I've used and I've used a lot of well regarded vintage 50s such as the Zeiss Pancolar and Pentax Takumar.
![ละลาย (LALALYE) - DAOU PITTAYA ต้าห์อู๋ พิทยา [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wo6r9TgausI/mqdefault.jpg)
I received this camera from a heritage and never really used it. Felt heavy and I already had a very nice camera. Until one day my main camera broke and used the D700 for a portrait shoot. I was blown away by the magical quality. Very different than the boring expensive modern mirrorless camera's. Right now the D700 is my main camera and I got it for free.
Thanks for sharing - what a camera to get for free! Glad you're liking the results.
I just got D700 in 2023 :-)
i bought my d700 in 2008 for $2600. Today it is still my main camera. I just shot a portrait session yesterday with it.
Right on Lou. It's perfect for portraits!
@@lensvana Brilliant !
THATS AWESOME!! D700 is very strong when shooting portrait
D700 for life
Bought one for $10.50 at a thrift store recently. Has a low shutter count and works like a dream. I’m super happy with it so far!
Join us here:
facebook.com/groups/330500120976297/
chances are that camera was stolen or something. No man in their right mind would sell one for that price, let alone low shutter count
@@KhoaNguyen-rk9dz stole it and then literally gave it away to Goodwill? Nope. It was likely from a hobbyist who couldn't figure out the controls
Well...at least you didn't haggle them to sell it for $9.50
@@PizzaPartyPewper im jealous! :D
My D700 journey:
I owned and loved one for years, but thought I need to upgrade to the latest "state of the art" cameras, so I got a Z6 and sold my D700. You know the saying "you don't really know what you got 'til it's gone" - absolutely applies to the D700. I regretted selling it so darn much after 2 months that I thought I might be better off with the successor - the D780. Gosh was I wrong, because it is basically a Z6 in DSLR body. Same boring image look, same weird skin colors that you can't get close to what the D700 did, no matter how hard you try, you won't get the same "magic". So I sold both the Z6 and the D780 to get my beloved beauty back and I did. And OMG am I happy now again. I got a totally unrealistically great deal on a MINT D700 with 35.000 clicks - it's looks and operates like new. You would never guess it is 10 years old!
I use it professionally and don't let ANYBODY tell you that 12MP is not enough to do professional work or huge prints! They even did a test with Peter McKinnon where they compared huge prints done with a 100MP and a 12MP camera and you just couldn't tell the difference. Also modern interpolation softwares like Gigapixel AI can upscale your images up to 8 times the original size with almost no loss and sometimes they look even better than the original ones.
Get a D700 NOW! The shutter counts on used ones will only rise from here on!
Thanks for sharing your journey! I think at some point we all encounter the "one that got away" camera. For many it's the D700 :) The cure for G.A.S. !
And you're right, modern software gets better and better so the low megapixel count becomes increasingly moot. Hope your shutter goes to a million!
@@lensvana Thanks man! It definitely is a cure for G.A.S. - I hav absolutely no desire to get another camera for photo-only purposes. And you really don't need anything else than a D700 or a D3 (which is basically the same sensor and processing with a slightly different reading algorithm than the D700 - so the handling and the images are pretty much the same).
consider yourself lucky and a good move....if your old 700 had way MORE clicks than the one you got now, it was timing and a blessing that you scored a deal!
That's right!! I think you should another D700 if you really LOVE it with the money you sold from Z6 and D780 (mistake to buy)
I've just bought one, but I did see one on mpb, and it had a shutter count of 1,280,000 😮 yes just over a million. I didn't buy it, but it does show how they can go on 🤗👍
I just bought a clean copy of a D3s ...the way these older 12MP Nikons handle light is something you can't put in words.
I got a d3 a month ago. Love it.
I just bought one 2 days ago 🤗
@@michannestudio I have a mint D3T (titanium) !
@@hornerinf tell us more, i can't seem to find any info on a D3T and would love to know more.
@@pakuplue Sorry I had brain fog. It is an FM3T. LOL
I have three of these. Got the money for a pair of D750s, tried both and stuck with this one, it's perfect for my work. My main (now retired) one has almost 500k clicks with the original shutter, it's immortal
I bought mine back in 2009 and it is by far the best camera I have ever used. I Own the D80, D300S, D800E, D500, D7000 and 2 D700 and 5 fujiflm XH1, Gfx 50, XPro 3, T20, X 100. There's nothing out there that feels and render images like the d700. I can look at different photo sites and can pick out a d700 image most of the time. there's just something different and unique to this camera, about how it renders images in a good way.
That's awesome Jesse - and you have quite the collection there! I know folks who have sold the D700, regretted it, and ended up buying another on the used market. It's just a perfect balance of everything
I bought the D3 & D300 in 2008, plus owning some Canon DSLR, M4/3 and Z6 and as far as color science concern, I like my Leica Q just as much as the D3. Now, I may have to consider the SL2 or M10 series more seriously.
I feel image quality (color sine, resolution, aesthetics) are all subjective, and you can argue that preference of the majority becomes standard, but I still think it is subjective. With this in mind I got the D800 as my first full frame, and later on my hobby progress into collecting vintage cameras and got myself a D700. I think I still like my D800 more because this is the first full frame I used and maybe got spoiled by the features of the D800. The resolution alone unlocks a lot of potential for capturing photos whether intended or unintended, and intended because you know you can do something with the crop, and the dynamic range on the D800 is so wide, it give an amature a lot of room to correct mistakes in post. This gives a lot of freedom when you know what your camera is capable off. With the D700, a lot of the features you get from a high resolution and high dynamic range becomes "limited", and there for challenging to me. So I use the D700 to challenge myself to be a better photographer. It challenges you to take a photo correctly the first time(although the DR on the D700 is no slouch either), and not use post as a crutch.
Lately I bought D700 used in Mint Condition (no scratches) and tried out myself compare to my Z6II, Fuji XT2, 5DMK2, 30D that I own. Let me tell you the way D700 render images, the color comes out are very Unique Outstanding that I can't find from others cameras I own. They are so Beautiful, are Not like Modern mirrorless cameras that are crazy Sharp. So Don't Be A FOOL yourself and say D700 only has 12 megapixels that's not enough. It's more than enough to print out 11x14" portfolio and larger size my friends...
I’ve used one of these professionally for several years and would never part with it. Weddings, local news, sport. It can do it all. The colours out of this things are genuinely special and I can spot the photos taken with the D700 compared to my D750. As for the 12mp sensor, the reality is that’s more than enough for most people. I shot a lot of football (soccer!) and as well as being used in print, I’ve had a team use some of my images on 6 feet high posters in my city and honestly they looked great. Most people don’t need a fraction of the features (or megapixels!) of the new cameras being churned out today for thousands of dollars. Working photographers’ equipment has to earn its keep and for most, spending $5,000 on the latest body makes no financial sense in the current photographic market. If you can’t make great photos with a D700, the problem is with you, not the camera.
Well said, Colin!
a photo editor friend of mine told me.....you want clear sharp images? get good glass....not the cheap shit!
Had mine for 2 months....my first ever DSLR and I gotta say this thing takes the most beautiful photos. Paid $700 AUD. Shutter count 32,000. Best money I’ve ever spent.
Awesome, that's a good deal too! More and more people are waking up to the magic of what the D700 can do...
I'm paying less than 400 AUD for a mint condition D700, shutter count is
@@StartreckTuhello bro can you tell me about shutter count and what to check before buying this camera...... Someone is selling it here in my city about 200$
I have 2 of these legends. Best money that I've ever spent. Panasonic sensor, just brilliant!! Who needs all those MP's. 12 MP is just fine if you know what's what.
Own one since 2009. Best camera I ever had. Even the used D850 I bought only just recently (which is from 2018) does not come close in build quality. Nikon threw everything into the D700 they had back then to make professional photographers happy with a full frame body without integrated vertical grip. I don't think they ever produced a better DSLR in their time. Done tons of professional shootings with it.
Well said! I've heard similar praise about the D3, D3S, D4 - looking forward to trying them one day
CORRECTION: I said that the D700 doesn't work with AF-P lenses. My mistake, it's compatible with FX (Full Frame) AF-P lenses, but not DX (Crop) AF-P lenses. Full compatibility info here: www.nikonimgsupport.com/eu/BV_article?articleNo=000035705&configured=1&lang=en_GB
TL;DR the only two quirks when working with AF-P FX lenses:
- The camera does not offer the "Manual focus ring in AF mode" custom setting for enabling/disabling focus ring operation in autofocus mode.
- If the standby timer is allowed to expire, the focus position will change when the timer is restarted, requiring refocusing. Specifying longer standby times is recommended for manual focus photography (remote photography, fixed photography using a tripod, interval timer photography, etc.) and in other situations in which the shutter may not be released immediately after focusing.
i bougt this camera in 2019 around $350 from my friend including 80-200 2.8 lens and $80 maintenance/cleaning i think one of the most best deal ive ever made
That's a good friend :)
3:30 “The danger ⛔️ ⚠️ of using the D700. It WILL become your favorite camera.”
That’s the clean truth baby!!!!
Yup! It may be 2020 but the D700 fanbase is only growing for this exact reason !
Well, if it's any indication...when I started using my D700's (I had three) for weddings, I sold my Hasselblads! I miss them just for the "feel" of using them, but my workflow became so much easier. I didn't have to process and scan all of my negatives or change film like a race car driver on the job. LOL
I love my D700, still using it after 8 years and it's a beast!
When I was shooting weddings and other events, I bought a D3 and a D700 in 2008 as a backup. I now own several newer cameras and they don’t compare with richer colors and low light photography. (D750, Z7 and D800) Friends scoffed that the D700 only had one card slot and a 95% viewfinder. Both complaints were nonsense if you are a true photographer. .
Very true, Ken. People shouldn't knock those (D3/D700) until they try it! Agreed those are non-issues. Results speak for themselves
@@lensvana Who cares about the 1 slot.My CF card is 6 years inside my D700 and never had a single fail.
About the vf.If someone can't see the shot or frame it the 100% coverage is not going to save them.
www.flickr.com/photos/191035018@N07/
@@ΝικοςΖωχιος-χ8π yeah, but only one time that happend on some important job, you re history.Big respect for d700
If you take pics for living only one card slot is a deal breaker in 2022....
2021, still my go to camera, just a stunning machine.
People complain that the D700 only has 1 card slot, my D700 will be 13 years old in 2022 and I've never had a CF card or card slot go bad but I'm careful when I insert the card.
Pair a D700 with 2.8 or faster Nikkor glass and you will be set for good.
I put a Sigma 85mm Art 1.4 on my D700. Its almost 2kg. Thankfully, the grip is outstanding (no pun).
Solid build & best colours ❤❤
I have over 250K on one of my D700's shutters and it's still chugging along. I keep buying newer camera bodies and coming back to my trusty old D700. Love those bodies.
Glad to hear it's still going strong! 250K should be nothing for the D700, you may even get to a million with that beast
bought mine two years ago for 300 bucks. 7000 clicks. love it.
I miss mine, unfortunately it did die, and now I use a d810 (since 2014) as my Nikon camera... One thing i love about these camera's: battery life is ridiculous. If you forget to turn off the camera you still don't get unpleasant surprises 2 days later.
From time to time I check how cheap these go. It's amazing!
I can't let mine go, it's an incredibly well engineered camera, possibly one of the toughest DSLR's ever built.
And I agree with you totally on the negatives. Used in good light without the need to crop this camera is still spectacular.
The d40 was once a revolutionary camera top of the line after the film cameras. I love it, never let me down.
I bought one 6 months ago and love it, I was lucky enough to get one with less than 2000 clicks for $425 from a camera store. I was already shooting Nikon so I have all types of lenses to use on this camera and it loves older manual lenses.
Under 2000 - great find!
It is STILL top of the line!! It's a good file with plenty to work with. I like my Fuji fine, but, as a portrait photographer, this one takes the cake.
Bought mine in 2009, just sold it the other week and thinking of getting a Z6 or something in that range... But now watching this videos about D700 get me emotional...this was by far the best piece of photo equipment I ever tried. So.. maybe.. I'll buy it again someday...
My D700 has 339,000 exposures now. Not sure when it will die but I will probably get another one if it does. The CCD in this camera is fantastic. Less noise than my D7200 up to ISO 3200
Great to hear that it's going strong at 340k clicks! Even the CCD noise is somehow more pleasing (although this is subjective)
Hi, since you have both D700 and D7200 could you tell me which is best?
The D700/D3 are using CMOS sensors, not CCD
Nice review!
I gave my first D700 to my son and I’ve since bought 2 more, each with under 9,000 shutter actuations. The colors are as magical as the D4
Thanks, Paul!
I shoot mostly fuji now and sold or gave away my Nikons but kept lenses. Then I saw this camera almost new (1500 shots) with grip and a 50mm f1.5 AFS lens in the $600 range. I went for it. I am not selling. The best kit I have bought on eBay.
Can also recommend the AF 70-210 f4-5.6 on this, it's so sharp for a cheap zoom and at the long end even has a somewhat decent bokeh, and it's only $100. Push-pull zoom isn't for everyone though. If you can get the D version, it's even better, very fast focus.
Good call! I've reviewed this lens before - it's excellent value for money indeed :)
Had mine for ten years. Absolutely love it.
I bought my D700 second hand directly from Japan seven or eight years ago and it was/is in pristine condition with a very low shutter count around 11K. It's small and heavy and it's a camera that's staying with me for life.
Great review. I've owned my D700 for 3 years now and everything you said is true. It is a bit of a beast but the photos I get from it are fantastic. With some good f2.8 glass it gets heavy, add the grip on it and it's neck breaker in weight. I also have a D200 and loved the pro body style with all the controls easily accessible, which lead me to getting the D700 plus it's full frame.
Thank you! A beast indeed, and a worthy upgrade for D200/D300 users. Must be hefty with f2.8 glass but can't argue with the results!
Most pros don't consider it a professional because it has only has one card slot but it's still a great camera. Nice review!
Good review, one point though on the sensor low light, some professionals tested it against the Z6 mirrorless sensor and found out the noise on the D700 is much more pleasing than the Z6, and also the colors on the D700 is unmatched, sometimes newer sensors not necessarily better.
Thanks, yep there's something to be said about how these older sensors handled noise. The less "digital" the noise appears, the better. Just one of the reasons why the D700 remains so popular today
With todays software like Gigapixel AI. It really makes the D700 a great camera to carry today.... it's a perfect pro camera. With gigapixel and sharpening software you can get output that rivals the D850 and beyond all with a 12 megapixel sensor.
Very true! I'm looking forward to those Gigapixel AI algorithms becoming even more widespread; eventually even free software will be taking advantage of this tech as it develops. Breathes new life into those 12mp images (and cameras).
I shoot with Fujis now, but I still have 2X D700 with battery grip. I love this D700 and I will never part with it along with all my awesome Nikon lenses. One of the few epic, classic cameras ever.
I like that setup, the best of both worlds!
Used to have a d700, loved it from the moment i got my hands on it. I used it for weddings, paired with a 50mm 1.8D, it was lovely. I recently switched to a d3, which i got for about the same price. The d3 is amazing in low light, i can go up to 5000 iso without any problems, when on the d700 i wouldn't go above 1600. Both are great cameras, but i'd recommend getting a d3, it's a workhorse
Thanks for sharing. I've only briefly used a friend's D3S, what a tank. Need to get my hands on a D3.
@@lensvana if you can afford a d3s go for it, it's way better than the d3, but for my budget the d3 was the best i could've got for roughly 290$
did a dogshoot last week in the woods with 70-200 2.8 VR1 at ISO5000 (for the run shoot) and DxO Photolab renders it without noise :) I own 5 D700 bodies, my first was a new one in 2009, my last second hand one only had 50 clicks! I own a D3s too now; I like those 6 tanks !
When my Canon died my sister's friend sent me one of these. So good.
Bought mine 1 month after release in 2008 and still use it professionally as a backup. I like combining it with film because it doesn't have the clinical resolution of my d850. It has worked flawlessly for 25 years. My F6 film camera manufactured around 2016, they made that film camera til 2020, should out live me. These cameras are not beasts or tanks, they were build to be reliable and long lasting. Yes, only 12 mp but if you are not printing and only viewing on line, you only need less than 8 mp.
You made me check my math! LOL You meant 15 years, not 25 years. :)
Mine is on the way from KEH can’t wait!
The D700 is a legend for sure, as well as the Nikon F100 (35mm Film) SLR. I'd wish, all gear nowadays would being build like the D700. Some are really plasticky.
PS: I do use this 28-70/3.5-4.5D since my F90x (1995!). It was the Kitlens for the F90. It was also *the* Kitlens for the F100 (1999) and the 2nd was the 28-105/3.5-4.5 Lens, that tells a story. I have 4 copies of it. Also the better, albeit way bulky 28-70/2.8 ED.
I like this body since 2008, when i've read the DPReview. But its only that many years later, since i bought one.
My first full frame DSLR. Bought mine when it came out (after D70) and will shoot with it until it dies. What a camera. Next will be probably the D850. For me it’s a better feeling than shoot with mirrorless.
I think the rise in popularity in these "old" cameras (its not even close to the age of my Nikon FE!) is that people are getting fed up and disillusioned with the current state of the camera world; camera makers and review sites are all the hype. Few people seem interested in photography any more. I've just picked one of these up in good condition for a little over £300 with 5000 clicks (arriving today 🤞). I intend to slap a 50mm on it and that's it. I honestly see it becoming my daily camera.
Join us here:
facebook.com/groups/330500120976297/
That's a great find for 300 pound! D700 with a 50mm is a great combo. And the Nikon FE... had one in silver, the one camera I regret selling.
@@lensvana Yes it was. I was looking at a couple with around 45-50,000 clicks, and then I saw this one! Snapped it up very quick. Bought in Good condition but looks like new. I've not taken it out yet, but it feels amazing and the few "around the house" photos I've taken look gorgeous, even if the subjects were a little rubbish. 😊 The strap and charger were still packaged in original packaging 🤷♂️
@@lensvana I have a silver FE with a 35mm attached. Don't use it very often, but thoroughly enjoy it when I do.
Great post! The D700 is amazing. I often shoot with a 50mm f1.8D. Sometimes I use a 28-105D. This my favorite digital camera. I love the the user interface because it reminds of my old Nikon film cameras. You can change all the important settings without digging thru the menu.
the best DSLR i used, got still 2 of them as backup now while i got the df and a sony a7r3
I bought a D700 Body for £300 and a 50MM F1.8 for £166. It's excellent and for under £500, you get a pro camera with sharp lens, it's great. 12MP is enough for A4 prints and instagram, which look great.
I bought a D700 body last week for £209. It’s a considerable move up from my old D100.
I have already bought a few Nikon prime lenses: 24mm 50mm… and, of course, a portrait lens 85mm.
I am really very excitedly looking forward to learning to use this camera to it’s maximum potential.
That's a great deal on a D700 - and a very good choice of a prime lens set! You should be set for a while with that kit :)
I have the same set up. I'm very happy with both lens and camera. Thank you for your review.
Thanks for watching!
It is indeed such a superb camera. My first DSLR and I still use it and love it. I am even thinking of getting a second one even if I already have a D500 and a D850, in order to put on my vintage manual lenses. Thank you for your very nice true video.
Thank you Flora for your kind words! Now is a good time to pick these up on the used market I think (good deals on eBay too). I think those vintage AI/AI-s lenses would look right at home on a D700 :)
I have several vintage lenses that I have used on it, they work great with the non CPU lens setup in the menu. I even took a vintage Tokina 35mm f2 lens with me when I went to Japan two years ago, got some great night street shots with that lens. D700 is not the best travel camera these days but I wanted the best photos I could get.
Excellent camera - excellent video. When I was able to afford a used D700 and started shooting with it, it was the first time ever that I did NOT feel that digital cameras were very inferior to the Nikon film cameras I owned. All the D3 era Nikons are fabulous. I also have a D3X which I love for portraits. Some people say it's no good because of it's poor ISO capabilities and low frames per second - so the D3X gets dismissed and passed over. if you don't need low light shooting and you don't need high frames per sec, then the D3X is another great alternative 12 year old choice for a 24 Megapixel Nikon portrait camera.
Thanks! The D3/D700 period was truly a golden era for Nikon and it's amazing how affordable these cameras are today (as the world rushes to mirrorless). You're right, the D3X doesn't get talked about enough - I'm sure there are plenty of pros still getting world class results with it today.
I got my D700 as soon as they came on the market. Bought the grip, wifi device for live image review on laptop and a load of lenses. It's been great, but the weight can start to feel tiring after a few hours, especially with the grip and a 70-200mm on it. I must be honest and say, yes, it produces 'film like' images, but I always preferred Canons more digital look. I've just ordered a Z5 with FTZ to see how mirrorless feels and shoots. May keep the 700 as a backup but honestly, the thought of lugging all that extra weight around does not appeal to a casual amateur
Thanks for sharing! Healthy reminder that if this hobby ever starts to feel like a chore, it's time to re-evaluate...
I recently got one with a shutter count less than 21,000 for $364. Excellent condition.
Nice find!
A D700 with a 35mm F1.8 has brilliant quality and silly pricing. Its lovely. I have two D700 bodies, the 35mm and 105mm macro. PERFECT.
2x D700s with a 35 + 105 prime combo... That's what I call reaching perfection... "lensvana" itself!
Join us here:
facebook.com/groups/330500120976297/
I feel image quality (color sine, resolution, aesthetics) are all subjective, and you can argue that preference of the majority becomes standard, but I still think it is subjective. With this in mind I got the D800 as my first full frame, and later on my hobby progress into collecting vintage cameras and got myself a D700. I think I still like my D800 more because this is the first full frame I used and maybe got spoiled by the features of the D800. The resolution alone unlocks a lot of potential for capturing photos whether intended or unintended, and intended because you know you can do something with the crop, and the dynamic range on the D800 is so wide, it give an amature a lot of room to correct mistakes in post. This gives a lot of freedom when you know what your camera is capable off. With the D700, a lot of the features you get from a high resolution and high dynamic range becomes "limited", and there for challenging to me. So I use the D700 to challenge myself to be a better photographer. It challenges you to take a photo correctly the first time(although the DR on the D700 is no slouch either), and not use post as a crutch.
Thanks for sharing! There's a lot to be said for getting it right in-camera - it's a great habit to pick up (sometimes I get too used to the insane shadow recovery of modern sensors).
Dear Nikon, please make brand new limited editions of the D700 in 202*. They have reproduced older models in the past
That would be kickass but sadly I don't think we'll see that - they are super focused on pumping out Z system cameras and lenses now before Canon/Sony take 90%+ of the full frame market share
Preach. The only thing I’d want is the newer AF system and an EXPEED 6. The problem is that although Nikon do have all the coding for the D700, the sensor no longer exists.
Just got a D700 yesterday and it's in rough shape. The memory card door is broken (needs replacement), the grip near the AF is gone, and all the grips on the sides needs replacing as they are coming off. Some guy had it in his storage for 7 years, never touched it. We slapped some AA's into the battery grip and it came to life like nothing. All for $150. Sure, it'll need some serious DIY TLC, but it was a deal I couldn't pass up.
Sweet! I like restoring these old workhorses back to life. With the door replaced it will be ready to rock. Great deal for $150
Received my replacement D700 yesterday with 7700 shutter count. Always regretted selling my original D700 a few years ago. The only camera I have missed out of all I have owned. It weighs a ton but I love it. Some of the best pictures I have taken with this camera. It will sit with my mirror less Z FC I acquired too.
Congrats on the replacement D700! That's a keeper especially with such low shutter count.
I got my D700 in 2011 eleven for about $2300. I'm still using it in 2022 it has about 85,000+ actuations on it. I have heard of shutter counts as high as 336k+, so it's a tank. Coupled with the 28--300 mm lens it's magic... that lens was made for that body. Though the D3s and the D4s look mighty tasty I would take another one of these (or two) in a heartbeat. I love this camera.
Don that's a great story, glad to see someone else still rocking the D700. That shutter is a survivor! Haven't tried the 28-300mm but hear it's an amazing performer even on higher res cameras. D4 for business, D700 for pleasure
@@lensvana, the D700m has never gotten the praise or recognition it deserves. There are those that would turn up their nose and keep walking. That's OK because an amazing camera can be had for a GOOD price.
5:25 that's a very good quick summary LOL. I like your points listed.
nikon d700 + nikon 35-70mm 2.8 = monster low cost full frame package
Join us here:
facebook.com/groups/330500120976297/
Great camera! My first full frame camera.
Same, just bought one and waiting for the Fedex guy to hand it to me....got a D300 and D7500 so looking forward to first full frame.....
Love this camera
I love my D700. Bought it new when it came out and I´m never going to sell it. Also have a D800, a D200 and a D7000. I like them all, but I guess the 700 is my favorite. Something about the look of the files that is more film-like to my mind, particularly in low light. Could be the larger pixels compared to the 800, maybe. Naturally, the 800 excels when cropping is necessary.
Thanks for sharing! There's something to be said for big, "clean" pixels if that makes any sense. When properly exposed, images from the D700 simply shine
I love my D700!
it is a great camera, almost perfect had not 95% of viewfinder coverage. The D300 offers quite the same, nowadays for 150 euros (viewfinder 100% coverage on the d300)
One of my favorite cameras ever.
I just bought one a couple of months ago - I love it!! Beautiful camera 👍
I have two of the D700’s both with the Nikon Bases?? Love the Hell out of Them!!👍👍
I agree, ISO 6400 is the limit for the D700. It also depends on the lighting. I've shot at ISO 3200 in bright consistant lighting & at snapshot size you can't tell the difference. Your RAW editor of choice can make a difference as well; Lightroom is just not good at noise reduction & sharpness in general, I use DxO Photolab & the quality of processing is remarkable. A great portraiture camera but can also produce great landscape photos as well.
I bought one mid year have not had much time to get out I use it but
it is great, mostly taken product shots and a few sunsets love the colours it gives, If you think the D700 is heavy try lugging my F5 about.
It is a very pro feeling camera. All exposure settings and focus ,drive modes etc have dials and or buttons. Very natural and contrasty image rendering straight out of camera which is pleasing. Also, the menu system is consistent with more modern following of Nikons which gives that consistency. I think the biggest downside for me against the D3 was the inefficiency of the battery and view finder coverage being 90% or so which can throw you off and sometimes requires more work like cropping in post if you didn't have the shot framed exact. The D3S in my opinion maximized this sensor's ability although I don't feel the ergonomics was as comfortable as the D700. I also wasn't a fan of the overly soft/spongey feel of the directional control button. If they only could have carried the image character into the newer cameras like the D800 as it was very similar handling wise just a bit better imo but it lost its secret sauce in image quality.
This was my very first dslr! Brings back memories! VERY nice piece of equipment! 👍🏾
A very nice camera to have as your first DSLR!
I’ve owned many camera’s now. This one is hands down my favorite, for the images it produces, and I will never part with it.
Side note: I slipped and smacked myself in the knee with it last week and wow... that hurt.
I have a D700 D610 and D7200 ....The D700 color and what it can do with it is what sets it apart.
I ordered my D700 and MB-D10 after the Nikon announcement in December 2008, it was on back ordered so I didn't receive it until February 2009. It's January 2021 it works perfectly! It is well built and has never required a trip to Nikon for repair. I wished Nikon would have upgraded it during its production run to a 16mp D700s, that said it sits in my camera bag alongside my D600 or D800. I don't see a need to upgrade to the Z5, Z6II or Z7II in 2021. Don't let the 12mp fool you, you can make awesome 8x10's or 11x14.
Right on Mark, congrats on getting the D700 before most of us :) And I'm with you, Nikon made so many amazing DSLRs that I'm not tempted at all by the mirrorless offerings. 12mp is a great filesize and just right for typical prints.
Thanks a lot pal, just bought one, seeing this video was the last straw, bought an F5 and lenses a few weeks ago and now one of these
Congrats on grabbing the F5, that one is a tank. Between F5 and D700, you've got two of Nikon's greatest hits!
@@lensvana The F5 shutter is a work of art, I bought the D700 to develop my skills without wasting film I have film, but once I can see what works and what does not I can be more confident of getting at least half of the film roll worth taking but yeah the F5 is precise in it’s action I can’t even hear the film advance just the winder turning, I might add, comparing the size between a D700 and say a D3, D4, with the vertical grip attached it’s actually bigger and heavier than the F5, a 12 megapixel iPhone 13 can take great pictures but it is definitely satisfying being able to change the settings, now I am after an aps-c but because I have a Minolta Alpha/Dynax/ Maxxum 7 and a handful of pro Minolta glass so I am looking to a Sony A77 for that, also I’m not sure what currency you are talking about but I got both the D700 and the F5 for 500 Australian Dollars and I verified the shutter count today as 13% so yeah gives me a reason to get up and leave the house in the early morning
@@aural_supremacy Prices are all over the place these days but you got a great deal there! That D700 is going to keep going for a while, perfect companion for photographic walks. Hey who knows maybe used DSLR prices may start creeping up again if they start getting the "vintage" appeal that film cameras enjoy.
The tag 'legend" is bandied about a lot, but the D700 is worthy of the title. terrific camera.
I bought d700 yesterday and I'm very happy. I bought it with nikon nikkor 24-70mm lens. What do you think about that lens.
I think you have one of the best camera + lens combinations possible - a truly professional setup. Nikkor 24-70mm F2.8 is part of the Nikon "Holy Trinity" of lenses!
@@lensvana Oh, really? I'm very glad to hear that.
I have a D90 that is only 12MP and it takes incredible pictures. I also have a D7200 that I use mostly now. It is fantastic but I still love my D90. I want a full frame camera and am considering either a D700 or a D610. I would consider a D750 but am afraid of getting one without all the factory recall fixes. What would you recommend?
I think a D610 would be the best choice - the low light performance alone will blow you away. For 12mp fun in good light you can always bust out the D90.
PS. You can punch in a D750 serial number into the Nikon tool: nikon.tfaforms.net/215 (Service Advisory) to see if it was affected.
I have a few cameras... but about 2 years ago, my uncle gave me one of his... a D700. I didn't touch it until a couple of days ago and now kicking myself for not even using it. I fell in love with it right away.
Better late than never! Great to hear another person is enjoying the D700
Very vivid colours!
It's a D3 but smaller, and a bit more slanted to image quality than speed. It was in the transition period when people still had all their film lenses which had to be good because in camera corrections were new and nonexistent with film. The latest firmware updates this. The Panasonic sensor renders images in a way that has not been surpassed, even today. Get a good one and you will never regret it.
I. Will. Use it now as my Main Shooting camera as need to know the settings for sports and getting familiar with it now
I recently attended an airshow as media.....had my publishers D500 and my D700......when the Blue Angels started to perform, I did alot of shooting. I then came home, uploaded my images and I seen something so awesome.......crisp, detailed, sharp as shit, and colors were great.....I went to 'details' to see the specs on the photo, guess what...............camera: nikon d700.
Thanks for sharing! Glad to hear the D700 is still being represented at air shows, must be especially glorious for golden hour pics with those colors
About the fps, you will achieve up to 7fps only by using an enel4a (d3 battery) with the bl3 battery door cover, and with the 12.1 megapixel pixel pitch you can print 24x30 posters, ive done it and they look perfect
I prefer my D700 over my A7r3 haha. Should have got the D700 first. I didnt expect to love it so much. So, because of that I carry my D700 everywhere as my daily driver camera. I love it!!
I got the D700 when it just came to market. Fabulous camera. Mine unfortunately got stolen along with al my lenses. I’ve used quite some cameras overtime but the D700 was my favorite. I just picked one up from Ebay in top mint condition with a shutter count below 9000. It should arrive within a few days.
Sorry to hear about the theft - I'd be livid. On the positive side, a D700 under 9k clicks is practically new :) Hope you enjoy it for years to come
My favorite camera, I'll keep shooting this camera until it gives up the ghost.
Thanks for your help I am looking at a D700 to go along side my D3 you made my decision very easy
That's a great pairing, can't go wrong with a D3 + D700!
I love dslrs for their toughness but mirrorless is no slouch either. Depends on what type your are looking at. I know people some people disregard mirrorless. But it was the same during the digital transition era
Recently bought a beautiful unmarked one for £400 15000 shots - great to use, waiting for the pandemic to pass so I can use it to it's full potential. Perfect with my D lenses. Heavy - yes, but I like a camera that feels solid, and has a comfortable feel as this does.
Great find, Mike! Hope it serves you well
Sorry to say the sample images don't do justice for the D700..
I agree it's best for portrait shooting..
Landscape it works well if you adjust the camera properly..
I have no problem with high ISO..
I've shot concerts at high ISO with once again no problem..
The noise on the D700 has a film quality to it..
Legends Never Die..
Shoot your but off with the D700.. ✌️😎👍
Brilliant video, you're right about that shutter sound. Just got a d700. I cannot believe the quality of this camera and I'm a Canon user. I'm currently using it with a Soviet Mir-24h 35mm f/2.0. I was going to use the Mir-24h as a stop gap lens until I could get a 50mm 1.4D or 50mm 1.8g but this camera has made me love the Mir again. I'm having trouble deciding whether to ge a 50mm 1.4D or 50mm 1.8g. I like the fact that I will be able to use the 50mm 1.4D on every other camera I own via adapter including my metabones speedbooster where it will be an f/1.0 lens. Though the 50mm 1.8g looks amazing and will weather seal the setup.
What a coincidence - I also picked up the Mir-24N recently (mine came with an M42 mount adapter). I've only used the 50mm F1.8G and it's such great value that I don't hesitate to recommend it - especially in minty used condition.
@@lensvana Thanks Lensvana, I've order a 50mm 1.8g. It looks like a very good lens. Certainly better than the Canon 50mm STM. The Mir-24n really shines on the D700. I bought it 3 years ago as an APSC normal lens. It cost me £60 and was bought from someone in the UK. I was thinking of selling it as I now have a Sony A7 and FE 50mm f1.8. I'm glad I didn't.
@@lensvana Thanks Lensvana, I've ordered a 50mm f1.8g. It looks like a very good 50, certainly better than the Canon 50mm STM. I got the Mir-24n three years ago as an APSC normal lens. Paid £60 for it from someone in the UK on ebay. I was thinking of selling my Mir-24h as I have a Sony A7 and FE 50mm f1.8 but I'm glad I didn't.
@@DryadMachine I think you'll enjoy the 1.8G! Even today folks are using it on mirrorless cameras with the FTZ adapter - it's just such great value and holds up to any sensor out there.
That Mir-24, yeah, I'm going to hold on to mine too (they're not getting any cheaper). It's an especially fun lens to use up close (24 cm min. focusing distance). I could see it especially popular with food photographers.
@@lensvana You weren't wrong about the 1.8G. I got one today and took some wide open landscape test shots and was blown away. It was too dark to stop down but I bet it is razor sharp by f4. The best 50 I've used and I've used a lot of well regarded vintage 50s such as the Zeiss Pancolar and Pentax Takumar.