I like both versions of Helter Skelter!!! When I first heard The Beatles version I was 14 and it blew away!!! When I heard Motley Crue's version in '83 I was blown away as well!!!
Wondering where all the bravery went around here while listening to this……… Hmmmmmm…… Cheap shot artists do eventually have to wind up running and hiding WHEN THEY GET CAUGHT!!!!!! 🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘
Mick Mars completely kills it! And this is a album you have to rock front to back over and over again if you think I’m wrong then maybe the Backstreet Boys are more your taste 😂👍🤟
As a player it's such a simply yet powerhouse riff ... Makes me want to just throttle the shit out of the neck, but it screws up an almost perfect r&r song! (It's a great cover!!!) --- (Listen to The Beatles and U2 versions)
I like the Beatles version more mostly because it is so different from their "normal" sound. This just sounds like any other Motley Crue song (not saying that that's a bad thing). I still like this version, though
it's i'll not i. so it should say well i'll see you again. because they're talking about going down and slide and talking to someone and vince is saying that since he's going down the slide again he'll see the person again once he reaches the bottom.
and if you look at motley crue the only time they switched to a certain genre is when they did the song smokin in the boys room but it was still more of a heavy metal version. see technically blues and heavy metal overlap themselves rock n roll and heavy metal do not overlap eachother they r 2 totally different genres due to the distortion on the guitar and heavier bass which the beatles were probably not used to which is y i think motley crue's version of this is way better cuz they've stayed with what they do best.
@karjo1000 I think there both equally as good this has more of a badass 80's music vibe and theneatles version has Paul McCartney who has a cool voice but I think I would go with the crüe version but there both awesome
tbh i like this version better than the Beatles version because i think the Beatles tried to switch there genre of music then what they're originally used to which is slow/rock n roll not heavy metal which is what motley crue does best they'll always be good redoing songs that should be in a heavy metal version which is why bands should stick to there original genre of music instead playing a certain genre then trying to go to a different genre which will make things bad because the band won't be used to playing a certain genre when you try to change. Basically bands shouldn't try to overdo them self they should just stick to what they've done best.
there are 2 ways to vote, singing and guitar work...Paul wins on the singing, and Mick Mars Rocks on the riffs!!!!!!!! Vince blew his voice out long ago, his best vocals was Shout at the devil! And Black sabbath originated Metal \,,,/, Beatles Helter skelter kicked off the punk sound.
Vince has one of the best voices in the biz. Mick completely shreds on the guitar...Makes me wanna break something!!!!!!
Snidely Whiplash yes indeed
Snidely Whiplash me TOO
@Rob Jones I jam this song in my Iroc Z, won't be blowin' her up though lol.
I like both versions of Helter Skelter!!! When I first heard The Beatles version I was 14 and it blew away!!! When I heard Motley Crue's version in '83 I was blown away as well!!!
The part at 0:22 when it has the ??? Should be "well I'll see you again"
Nobody knows what is meant.....Z
maybe
Haha I was just checking for this comment, coz if it wasn't here I was gonna write it too. 😉
Motley Crue's amazing! You don't know what you're missing out on girl!
Wondering where all the bravery went around here while listening to this………
Hmmmmmm……
Cheap shot artists do eventually have to wind up running and hiding WHEN THEY GET CAUGHT!!!!!!
🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘
I love and miss motley crue I saw them twice but they will forever live in my heart🤘
too young to fall in love
@@MrJgreig72 It was made by the Beatles.
@@VenicePlayz-zx4dc Yeah I know!
awesome! I can't decide which version is better: Motley Crue or The Beatles.
Motley Crue by far.
Mick Mars completely kills it! And this is a album you have to rock front to back over and over again if you think I’m wrong then maybe the Backstreet Boys are more your taste 😂👍🤟
The only video with no dislikes
Helter Skelter 2020 BreakDown !
so.. like only one ear in my earbuds work.. so i can't hear the whole song correctly it's just... sad
I love this version but the beatles gave it to us, for that we thank them.
The Beatles SUCK!!
excellent vid and thank you very much for making it!
THEY LIGHTED NIKKI ON FIRE!? Is he okay? i would have loved to see that omfg. He's that awesome. xD
More then once btw
Best version ever! Motley crue has outdone the original on every cover they have done except 1 and that was "Anarchy"
gettin ready for a karaoke party on the 10th of Dec. This is the song that will be shakin the stage!!
@420npb the versions are so different its hard to compare them but almost nothing beats any of the beatles songs
I dont know.. I feel like killing after I hear that song!!
nice job,:)
As a player it's such a simply yet powerhouse riff ... Makes me want to just throttle the shit out of the neck, but it screws up an almost perfect r&r song! (It's a great cover!!!) --- (Listen to The Beatles and U2 versions)
This song Is like a madhouse with all power in these guys
hahaha "???" made me laugh
They don't say, "I got blister's on my finger's at the end."
MrJgreig72 that’s the Beatles thing not motley crues
Cuz Mick Mars' fingers were too calloused (:
You heard of the Beatles?
1000th like
Nice!
And funny, as well.
(Bitchin' rock band, though . . .)
I like the Beatles version more mostly because it is so different from their "normal" sound. This just sounds like any other Motley Crue song (not saying that that's a bad thing). I still like this version, though
satisfying video
??? lol
This song is such a madhouse
1. Mötley Crüe
2. Aerosmith
3. The Beatles
4. U2
5. Oasis
@MrMegaFredzeppelin Motley Crue would never ruin a song. They are too epic!
crue bows beatles away...and i love the beatles
the verse ??? say ; "Well I Do It Again" ... cool song congrats man!
The best
like the question mark part in the video it should say "well i see you again."
Anyone else find-out this is a cover? I just found that out yesterday, and I don't even like the beatles.
This song is about a roller coaster
??? my fav girl
love it
it's i'll not i. so it should say well i'll see you again. because they're talking about going down and slide and talking to someone and vince is saying that since he's going down the slide again he'll see the person again once he reaches the bottom.
and if you look at motley crue the only time they switched to a certain genre is when they did the song smokin in the boys room but it was still more of a heavy metal version. see technically blues and heavy metal overlap themselves rock n roll and heavy metal do not overlap eachother they r 2 totally different genres due to the distortion on the guitar and heavier bass which the beatles were probably not used to which is y i think motley crue's version of this is way better cuz they've stayed with what they do best.
@QuiteHotBros I like that version also because it was the origional. I like them both for different reasons.
Do it again
Word of God Amen powerful God is calling all to Repentance turn from your evil ways repent Amen end has come Amen
MOTLEY CRUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@karjo1000 I think there both equally as good this has more of a badass 80's music vibe and theneatles version has Paul McCartney who has a cool voice but I think I would go with the crüe version but there both awesome
Vince Neil really killed it better than Sir Paul Mcartney.
Sushie Fan no way lmao
....I get to the bottom and I see you again...Helter Skelter Yeah!!!
the question mark should be "well i see you again."
i don't even call motley glam except maybe around the theatre of pain era i just call them hardcore rock and roll
Yeah. This is exactly what I felt when I listened to Guns N' Roses' cover of Knocking on Heaven's Door and the original by Bob Dylan.
How do you not know the lyrics to this song?
🌹
tbh i like this version better than the Beatles version because i think the Beatles tried to switch there genre of music then what they're originally used to which is slow/rock n roll not heavy metal which is what motley crue does best they'll always be good redoing songs that should be in a heavy metal version which is why bands should stick to there original genre of music instead playing a certain genre then trying to go to a different genre which will make things bad because the band won't be used to playing a certain genre when you try to change. Basically bands shouldn't try to overdo them self they should just stick to what they've done best.
Yeah yeah...😂
Why don't we ask Charley which version is better.You know who I'm talking about.
I like both the Beatles version and Mötley Crüe version. It's hard to choose which one is the best.
Kiss should have opened for Mötley Crüe!!!!
UCM…….The return. ☠️☠️
i actually like this version better than the Beatles version because im more of a heavy metal guy
Needs Children Of The Beast leading up to it.
When I get to the the bottom...yea.☠☠☠💀💀💀🙈
im a pretty sure it was!
the baetles version was and everyone copied so yeah look it up!!
Yeah.. when I get to the bottom..yeah.......
the beatles wrote this song
Tbh I find this one better than the Beatles version
there are 2 ways to vote, singing and guitar work...Paul wins on the singing, and Mick Mars Rocks on the riffs!!!!!!!! Vince blew his voice out long ago, his best vocals was Shout at the devil! And Black sabbath originated Metal \,,,/, Beatles Helter skelter kicked off the punk sound.
???=My favorite girl.
Shallow
atleast they can sing.
Def Leppard had the dummer with one arm... So he's kinda more unique than Tommy
It's spelled cpyright no w
I like the increased speed of this version but Paul McCartney is a better singer so I mainly.listen to the Beatle version
Wayneio Schweinfurtheo You should try Frank Iero and the Patience's cover. I find that one to be perfection.
Repentance prayer Father I bow before you I repent of all my sins I accept your son Jesus Christ into my heart Amen
dexter brought me here
yewwh may be a lover but yewh aint no dancer.(:
The only disappointment about this cover is not hearing "I've got Blisters on my fingers!"
Did you know this was written for Charles Manson???
jessie franklin no it wasn't
MOTLEY CRUE> THE BEATLES
jees more bubble gum or go home
@74wasagreat led zeppelin hands down no comebacks
That dude was twisted, and not in the good way dude.
Beatles was original not a cover
This version is good but I still like the Beatles version better. This version isn't quite as metal or catchy.
All this 80s fem glam rock is terrible, Beatles did it best
love the crue but they did not do this song justice
I think you mean Charles Manson?
wrong
yeah b*tch yeah!!!v so so so!! much beter tha nthe beatles!!!!\
nope. beatles are number one by far.
The original is much better
false
Hannah Chappell true
Paul McCartney All the way