Royal Marine Reacts To India vs China - Who Would Win?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ธ.ค. 2023
  • Original Video (India vs China - Who Would Win? Army/Military Comparison)
    • India vs China - Who W...
    DREADNOUGHT MEADERY!
    TH-cam: / @dreadnoughtmeadery
    Instagram: / dreadnoughtmeadery
    BECOME A MEMBER
    www.youtube.com/@OriginalHuma...
    SOCIALS
    ►Instagram @OriginalHuman_
    ►Twitter: @OriginalHuman_
    ►Discord: / discord
    ►Facebook: / originalhuman.videos
    ►Business inquires: originalhumanbusiness@gmail.com
    OTHER CHANNELS
    ►The Sword And Scabbard: / @theswordandscabbard7909
    ►OriginalAdventures: / channel
    ►OriginalHuman Geek: / @originalhumangeek .
    .
    MY EQUIPMENT:
    Camera: amzn.to/3W9dL37
    Lights: amzn.to/3JtLflf
    Key Board: amzn.to/3JpPWwx
    Headphones: amzn.to/3JrF15x
    Mouse: amzn.to/49P81ij
    Monitors: amzn.to/4aLd1FP
    Mic: amzn.to/3U7XWXY
    Audio mixer: amzn.to/4b2FJSr
    StreamDeck: amzn.to/4b4lHH1
    Favorite Books:
    Norse Mythology: Neil Gaiman
    amzn.to/4b24Ftc
    The Way of Kings: Brandon Sanderson
    amzn.to/3JyHIlu
    Breath: James Nestor
    amzn.to/3Jur9Y7
    We Are Nature: Ray Mears
    amzn.to/3JurhXB
    The Last Kingdom: Bernard Cornwell
    amzn.to/3w4JjN0
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 424

  • @tradelite3463
    @tradelite3463 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +296

    The map of India is wrong in this video 🆘

    • @Rocky-111.
      @Rocky-111. 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      The world use that map.

    • @Sarthak_Joravar
      @Sarthak_Joravar 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      yes bro but thats the truth 😔😔

    • @sks108
      @sks108 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      That's why it's blocked by the Indian Government in India

    • @JaiKumar-gu9zn
      @JaiKumar-gu9zn 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes

    • @ChetanVermavlogs2002
      @ChetanVermavlogs2002 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Yes he should change it

  • @prashantsinha6781
    @prashantsinha6781 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +143

    16:14 Russia won't help China, as it has good relations with both the countries.

    • @discoveryyt8066
      @discoveryyt8066 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Fuck guys the Map of India is wrong please insist him to delete this video . This is crime ☝️👍

    • @solidbhatt
      @solidbhatt 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@discoveryyt8066bruh

    • @spilltea4241
      @spilltea4241 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Russia will stay neutral as it has great economic ties with China and diplomatic ties with India. But if Russia decides to support China, India is doomed coz most of our military hardwares come from Moscow. Thats one of the reason why we lost in 1962, USSR being China's ally delayed supply of Indian military hardwares as late as they cld.

    • @batboy555
      @batboy555 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They have other issues anyway.

    • @KarmHeeDharmHai
      @KarmHeeDharmHai 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      China claims a lot of Russian land too.

  • @ashishsrivastava2920
    @ashishsrivastava2920 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    Also.. Most Indians are super patriotic... Instant military recruitment will boost in India..

    • @kicker3595
      @kicker3595 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yesterday 4 Indians have been killed in Kashmir, many indian soldiers have been killed always, khalistan, Kashmir, Assam, Sikkim, Manipur, Tamil, karela, Bengal... They are patriotic 😂😂😂😂

    • @Krankenwagen571
      @Krankenwagen571 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      So are the chinese

    • @vickybharti3845
      @vickybharti3845 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@Krankenwagen571 we have seen during galawan clash they are crying in bus

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@vickybharti3845The crying video was from two years ago. It was from several new recruits in Zaozhuang, Shandong. They shed tears because joining the army required leaving their hometown and family for two years. And the troops they serve in are in the northeast of Heilongjiang, China. This video was deliberately distorted by the Taiwan Democratic Progressive Party and then spread to India. Every year, the United States and Taiwan use a large amount of funds to slander and spread rumors against China. In 2022 alone, the United States allocated $500 million to slander and spread rumors against China. In China, joining the military is voluntary and not mandatory. Every year, young people in China actively participate in the military, and there are hardly any conscription advertisements in China.

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@vickybharti3845Indians have always been surrounded by false information, which is why in 1962, when India failed, the whole country was shocked. At that time, the whole world knew that India was bound to lose, only India itself did not know. Under the instigation and instigation of the United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union, India's heart was extremely inflated. If India had increased its understanding of the willpower of the Chinese people and the combat effectiveness of the People's Liberation Army, believe me, India would not have rashly implemented a "forward policy". Today's India is extremely similar to 1962. Stupid and superficial.

  • @ashyouknow7420
    @ashyouknow7420 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    This video is old and for a country as fast growing as India a lot can change in 3 years. PS: The original video is blocked in India.

    • @sks108
      @sks108 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Because it represents the wrong map of India

    • @ashyouknow7420
      @ashyouknow7420 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sks108 Yes

    • @agelessrebellion8271
      @agelessrebellion8271 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@sks108 let me guess- the "right map" claims you own so much more land right?

    • @user-fh1yx1hq8t
      @user-fh1yx1hq8t 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      哈哈哈哈亚洲你们最强

    • @TDtsunami
      @TDtsunami 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@agelessrebellion8271 well yes its basically china being china the same way they think they own the sea near japan taiwan and all they think they own parts on india which is stupid.

  • @Akash_Akshay
    @Akash_Akshay 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    The video is blocked in india for using incorrect map of india...this might also get blocked blur it out😂

  • @spilltea4241
    @spilltea4241 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    India has enough power to defend itself, and it has no intention of invading China.

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I hope for good neighborly friendship between China and India. China has never invaded any country or region. India should show the courage to correct historical mistakes.

    • @spilltea4241
      @spilltea4241 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mingmuyiyang8615
      China literally invaded India, Vietnam, Burma and claims lands of almost all of its neighbours

    • @yogendrasinghchauhan5658
      @yogendrasinghchauhan5658 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mingmuyiyang8615 lol how can u even say this absurd statement......china is a country of invaded lands glued together.......hongkong, mangolia, tibet......nd yet u want more (Taiwan)..........chinese are greedy assholes.

    • @aarushisingh8862
      @aarushisingh8862 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Boy o boy!
      I wished you have read more books than provided by your government.You need so much historical lessons. You invaded so many countries and you are still invading.

    • @aarushisingh8862
      @aarushisingh8862 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Tibetan Uprising (1959) China
      China-Burma border campaign (1960-1961) China Burma
      Sino-Indian War (1962) China
      Vietnam War (1965-1969)
      Others too

  • @KarmHeeDharmHai
    @KarmHeeDharmHai 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    9:00 as it stands CCP army is compulsory service. Indian Armed Forces is 100% voluntary.

    • @raidenshougun9663
      @raidenshougun9663 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The chinese army doesn't do traditional Conscription, it's army is completely Voluntary but once their enlisted, they'll be considered as a ,,conscript" even tho they voluntarily joint the Army. This is a thing that is bein missunderstood of the Chinese Military.

    • @SpruceWood-NEG
      @SpruceWood-NEG 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      There's nothing to compare. It is difficult for China to join the military. Currently, it requires at least a university degree and high physical fitness requirements. There are not many professional infantry in the Chinese military anymore, all of them are technical units. Professional composite unit sergeant.

    • @guoyuheng9891
      @guoyuheng9891 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      lol if Chinese Army is compulsory then China will get more than 10 million people due to China has more than 13.5 Billion population

  • @aarushisingh8862
    @aarushisingh8862 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Also one major advantage is that india has more youth (much more) than china which in cases like war will help india to recruit more.Half of indian youth train for entrance exam of army but due to selected number of seats many are not taken in by the army.
    Indian as a public point of view is a very strong nation, they are more patriotic and will force through social media and rallies.
    Also there are more indian men/women in world right now who are holding good positions of economic considerations of that particular country.This will also create pressure on china.
    And last but not the least whole world knows how india is a good cultural and friendly country.Many people will boycott chinese goods and china will not even thrive a day.
    I have not even mentioned about military and navy here and still showed you how india will win.
    This time we are not looking upto American govt faces.
    We have strength of our own.
    🇮🇳 Namaste 🙏

  • @Operator8282
    @Operator8282 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Since this video you are commenting on is a few years old, the Indian population is now higher. However, it is the demographics that are more important. India has WAY more people of fighting age than China. Look up both China and India's population by age. THAT is by far the most important number NOT stated in the video.

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The perception of Indians is the same as in 1962, ignorant and superficial.

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I hope Indians can read carefully and experience with their hearts. The huge difference in the founding of China and India determines the biggest difference between India and China. Just look at the modern history of both countries and you will understand. India has been colonized by Britain for more than 200 years. In 1947, Britain experienced World War II, its strength declined significantly, and its status was replaced by the United States. India achieved independence through non violent and non cooperative means. In other words, India's independence has not undergone the test of blood and fire. Such an independent country lacks cohesion, willpower, and a sense of national identity. Now let's talk about China. Since the British defeated the corrupt and incompetent Qing government in 1840, the Chinese people have been living in dire straits. Various disasters and wars followed one after another. At that time, China was very poor and backward, suffering various humiliations. Including the cession of Hong Kong and Macau, Taiwan becoming a Japanese colony, the Eight Nation Alliance setting fire to the Old Summer Palace, and subsequent Japan's comprehensive and brutal invasion of China. In 1931, Japan launched a full-scale invasion of China. From 1931 to 1945, the war lasted for 14 years. The Chinese military and civilians rose up to resist, fought with blood for fourteen years, and suffered 30 million casualties, ultimately achieving victory. Do you know why there are so many casualties in China? There are hundreds of reasons, and I will only give an example of one phenomenon: Chinese troops are in conflict with Japanese troops. Often, if the number of Chinese soldiers participating in the war is 100, they only have 20-30 firearms. The remaining soldiers did not give up resistance or surrender. They bravely fought against the Japanese machine guns and cannons with machetes, steel forks, and wooden sticks until they sacrificed themselves. This spirit of facing death as if returning home and never retreating is the Chinese spirit. 30 million casualties! Do you think this can happen in India? For India, it is zero casualties because their knees are soft. India will soon give up resistance. Do you know why there was the Nanjing Massacre? Due to the desperate resistance of the Chinese military and civilians, they will never surrender or give up. After Japan captured Nanjing, firstly to vent its anger, and secondly to scare off other Chinese soldiers and civilians in resistance. However, the Nanjing Massacre not only did not deter any Chinese people, but also further aroused the resistance of the Chinese people. The establishment of New China has gone through the test of blood and fire. Do you know why the Chinese national flag is red? That's because the establishment of New China was bought with the blood of countless Chinese ancestors, and we Chinese people will always remember it. From 1945 to 1949, during the Chinese Civil War, the Kuomintang fled to Taiwan. Originally, the Chinese people thought they could live a peaceful life they had longed for, but in 1950, the Korean War broke out, lasting three years. The Chinese People's Volunteer Army successfully resisted the northward route of the United States without air superiority, sea superiority, outdated army equipment, and extremely poor logistics, at the cost of losing hundreds of thousands of brave People's Liberation Army soldiers. As for India's unforgettable and shameful 1962 Sino Indian War, in the eyes of us Chinese, it was not a war at all. Firstly, it only took 32 days. Secondly, from 1959 to 1961, China experienced the most difficult three years since the founding of the People's Republic of China, during which many people starved to death. In 1962, India's economy far surpassed that of China. Both the United States, the Soviet Union, and Britain support India. At that time, India implemented a "forward policy" and attacked China with elite troops. We Chinese people really don't want to go to war. The Chinese troops that participated in the war with India in 1962 were ordinary border defense forces, not regular People's Liberation Army. In China, soldiers are known as the "cutest people". There is a Chinese proverb: without a country, there is no home, and soldiers are the backbone of the country. Thank you to our brave soldiers of the People's Liberation Army who are always ready to defend the borders of our motherland. No matter how India develops its military, it cannot surpass China. Whether in the past, present, or future, China can always defeat India. This is determined by the history and culture of both countries. Chinese people value the spirit of dedication and sacrifice. Do not surrender, do not surrender, vow to resist to the death, and face death as if returning on the battlefield. If Chinese soldiers surrender on the battlefield, it would be a great shame, and the spirit of dying rather than giving up is deeply engraved in the bones of every Chinese person. These are all things that Indians do not possess. So, even now or in the future, India will never be able to defeat China. Now, do you think India can stand tall in the world like China? Absolutely impossible.

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Indian army is the worst army among all China's opponents. The Chinese War of Resistance Against Japan lasted for 14 years, the Chinese Civil War lasted for 4 years, the Korean War lasted for 3 years, and China's self-defense and counterattack against Vietnam lasted for 2 months. China's 10-year border war with Vietnam. India's understanding of "war" is too narrow. We Chinese believe that India has never experienced a real war. In 1962, in the eyes of the Chinese people, it was not a war, it was just an armed conflict between China and India. In 1962, a brief, just 32 day armed conflict continued India's nightmare for decades. What makes Chinese people laugh is that a border conflict has turned India into a "New Delhi Capital Defense War".

    • @Operator8282
      @Operator8282 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@mingmuyiyang8615 India had plenty of people who have experienced real war, Back in 1939-1945, fighting the Germans and Japanese, as part of the British empire.
      If you REALLY believe that ANY conflict that the "Great and Glorious" China gets into, with a near peer adversary, will be an instantly won, easy walk in the park, YOU are Deluded as Putin was and still is, for thinking Ukraine was gonna be a 3 day victory parade for his troops, and anyone telling you so is also deluded. Both you and they are a fool to think otherwise. Go read Sun Tzu. He'll also tell you the same

    • @Operator8282
      @Operator8282 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mingmuyiyang8615 Holy shit? How much social credit did THIS WALL of TEXT buy you?!?!?!?! And WHAT DID YOU DO to need to write all that ?! Really, I want to know, so I can avoid doing it if whoever tries implementing something like what you must be going through where I am isn't killed instantly, along with all his or her cronies. The demographic crash China would face in a war with ANYBODY would be absolutely catastrophic, and I mean MUCH, MUCH worse than what it is going through now, Great Heart and Fighting Spirit or not. It doesn't matter if ANY of China's potential opponents have weak knees NOW, and almost all nations grow a mighty fine spine if slapped around. Hasn't been a lot of slapping in that neck of the woods, in the last 45 years or so, not since Viet Nam slapped China around.

  • @klanman5812
    @klanman5812 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The problem with the USA is that they saw and maybe still see the World in binary terms, that is Western Democracy and Communistic regimes. So, when it came to countries with “humanism or socialistic” governments they placed them firmly into Communist “want to be” category, which for some reason they seem to perceive as really bad. So, in the 1962 Indo-China war, USA refused to assist because India was a Socialistic state. When the Indo-Pakistani war in 1972 occurred, the US chose to support Pakistan because it was anti-India (which was a Socialistic state). Ironically Pakistan was a State controlled by a military dictatorship, but the US found them eminently more attractive because they were supposedly anti Communistic. India was forced to turn to Soviet Russia, which helped India greatly - which India has never forgotten. The irony has continued as the US continued this policy of support for military dictatorships around the World, destabilizing nations, particularly in South America. However, more recently “the chickens have come home to roost” as they say, as refugees from these destabilized states now head for the USA to try and get a piece of the “American dream (now a tip-o-cracy at best)”. And guess what? The country that caused this destabilization doesn’t want them! India was slow to come to the ‘realpolitik’ party, it now understands that it’s importance is waxing by the day - particularly as China seems to be continuing to snatch defeat from the jaws of economic success! But India should not expect the US to help them carte blanche, as it did with China. it fears creating another China. Sadly the US has still not learnt that not all Asians are the same.

  • @Ashewezah
    @Ashewezah 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You gained yourself a solid fan.. Love from india..

  • @AryanRaj-ib5oi
    @AryanRaj-ib5oi 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    From where does The Infographic Show get its data? *India never requested fighter jets from the US or Russia after the Galwan Clashes.* In fact, as the case stands today, Both American and Russian fighter jets are slated to lose India's MRFA Contract for 114 Fighter Jets to the French.

    • @No_One1231
      @No_One1231 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Not the recent clash but during 62 clash

  • @talkingdrops
    @talkingdrops 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    btw as indians we dont have any faith on infographic show because its bised and sometimes wrong, like he always says India needs USA but in reality USA needs India 😂 😂

    • @Bothandle70
      @Bothandle70 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      USA wants India to be another Ukraine fighting its battle against their adversaries.

    • @devinjenkins4752
      @devinjenkins4752 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I can assure you the US needs absolutely nothing from India lol...Look at import/exports...yall literally would crumble economically if the US cut ties, the US however gets barely anything from India that cant be gotten anywhere else for a base price. 🤣 Idk where you even thought the US needs india in any way. We have more food, military, political pull, better economics and unlike india we arent on a brink of economic collapse due to overpopulation.

    • @sweetrolldealer
      @sweetrolldealer 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sure buddy

  • @razataggarwal7365
    @razataggarwal7365 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Map of India is wrong in video , Please correct it ASAP.
    Aksai chin and POJK are Integral part of India.

  • @buffalosoldier2623
    @buffalosoldier2623 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The fact that you were a Royal Marine but dont know the basic facts about Natural allies vs Natural Enemies, basic geopilitics as it pertains where countries are located strategically on the world map does not reflect well on the Royal Marines.

  • @Ajay_503
    @Ajay_503 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Iran Russia won't fight against us . 😅 Bro they've a good relation with us

  • @Anonymous-wf3xk
    @Anonymous-wf3xk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    do check the manufacturing date & details

  • @withrrwithrr8190
    @withrrwithrr8190 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    India, never started any war or never occupied even 1 inches of any other country. That's enough to state Indian army's professionalism

    • @user-vw1wq1ld5e
      @user-vw1wq1ld5e หลายเดือนก่อน

      There have been several wars between India and Pakistan, and no matter what, we in China have never occupied territories that do not belong to us, and even for disputed oceanic islands and reefs, we are in favour of shelving disputes and developing them jointly. I don't believe that war will break out between China and India, although we have territorial problems due to British colonisation, we will not unilaterally change the status quo. Unless India invades, I find it hard to imagine a war between China and India

  • @devanshrana7145
    @devanshrana7145 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Russia will remain neutral india vs china war because it has good relation with both countries..

  • @TrainsandRockets
    @TrainsandRockets 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    India never had a border with China since 2500 years...of Chinese history.
    India had border with Tibet much before that untill 1950s when China captured Tibet and Tibetians had to flee with Dalai Lama to India for shelter.

    • @felix_huang
      @felix_huang 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      既然你说西藏不属于中国,有意思的是,藏人的藏南从来不属于印度,印度为什么要成立阿鲁纳恰尔邦。谎言拆穿的时候真的很有意思

    • @miroku2891
      @miroku2891 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The three dynasties of Yuan, Ming and Qing all ruled Tibet.

  • @CainCorvinus
    @CainCorvinus 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Humans just need to go down a UAD path like in the lore from Starcraft. A fully united earth, United Earth Directorate. Putting all their efforts into space exploration and coming across an alien threat to pour their angers into instead of each other.

  • @-NOCAP-
    @-NOCAP- 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Even if Russia wasn't tapped out in Ukraine, they wouldn't back China over India. Russian/Indian relations are nearly as strong as Russian/Chinese. Even if Russia didn't lack the capabilities to back China (which is the current situation), they would still sit out of that conflict.

    • @jliang70
      @jliang70 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They would not back India over China. China is an international manufacturing giant, Russia with Chinese support can withstand the US sanction but not with Indian support.

  • @carriehoback3763
    @carriehoback3763 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Merry Christmas bro

  • @blackman7186
    @blackman7186 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The thing with china and India is, all those tanks and aircrafts are useless due to the impossible terrain of the Himalayas. Like, do you really think thousands of tanks could roll on the rigid mountains? And this area is extremely high altitude with unstable weather making air support extremely difficult. China and India have been isolated from each other from thousands of years, that's for a reason.

    • @agelessrebellion8271
      @agelessrebellion8271 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i seem to recall the land both are fighting over is more then enough to push hundreds of units through at a time. both sides literally had hundreds of tanks, trucks, and other vehicles right in the mountains. if one or the other wanted to start a war...all the commanders need to say is "forward" and the army is pushing into the others nation.

    • @blackman7186
      @blackman7186 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@agelessrebellion8271 that's not right. The mobilization did happen but only the army was involved from both sides. Its only the soldiers that were mobilized not tanks. Even if you see the video of Galwan Valley Clash you can only see soldiers with maces and sticks. There were no tanks involved. It's not possible to mobilize tanks in that region and that's why both countries are furiously building infrastructure in the mountains, roads, bridges, tunnels etc. but for now there's no way even hundred tanks could be sent across the borders. What you are saying was just an intimidating tactic.

    • @agelessrebellion8271
      @agelessrebellion8271 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@blackman7186 the only reason you see soldiers with sticks was very clearly mentioned. both sides were under *DIRECT ORDERS* to NOT use guns for any reason. so the soldiers fought with clubs and sticks of course you wont see tanks. however, both sides DID bring tanks and vehicles to the region. you can find pictures of both.

    • @blackman7186
      @blackman7186 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@agelessrebellion8271 can you provide source? I didn't see any pictures. And again, Mobilization does not matter at all. Armies can be mobilised hundreds of times. Sending tanks across the borders is a completely different thing and clearly it's not been done yet because it's unrealistic.

  • @AryanRaj-ib5oi
    @AryanRaj-ib5oi 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    *The Western media figure of "20 Indian soldiers and 4 Chinese soldiers died" is inaccurate.* China did not release an official casualty count for a very long time *(8 MONTHS) after the clashes.* When they did, they only declared 4. The then Northern Command chief, Lt Gen Y K Joshi had said that Indian observation posts had noted *more than 60 casualties being taken back by the Chinese,* how many of them were fatal or non-fatal couldn't be told with authority. An Australian news agency, The Klaxon reported based on independent inputs received from Chinese bloggers and year-long discussions held with inside informers and several Weibo users that *38 Chinese soldiers had died* in the deadly clash. Russian Media House TASS reported the *Chinese causality count was 45.* Much much higher than the 4-5 officially declared number by the PLA in a very delayed manner as opposed to the Indian side informing of the death of 20 Indian soldiers to its citizens immediately after the clashes. Recently, *India's then Army chief in his new book, stated that the 35-40 casualties reported by TASS and others were similar to the intelligence reports of the US* & the UK. Media reports of Chinese casualties after the clashes were very soon deleted from Chinese SM.

    • @AryanRaj-ib5oi
      @AryanRaj-ib5oi 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      *There were local reports of two-figure casualties in the 30s in China. Those reports disappeared from Chinese Social Media very quickly.* CCP cracked down on the media to not talk about the numbers. A month later or so, a video of a new graveyard in Tibet surfaced, *this was widely believed to be the grave of dead PLA soldiers.* Informally, Indian commanders in the know pegged the *Chinese casualties in the 40s,* though it is not official. The Indian Govt. and the Indian Ministry of External Affairs did not comment on the declared PLA casualties by China. There were many videos of the clash and wounded Chinese soldiers making rounds on Weibo, *and they all were removed from the platform very soon.*

    • @jliang70
      @jliang70 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Indian losses is more likely 180 from the Chinese social media I read.

    • @AryanRaj-ib5oi
      @AryanRaj-ib5oi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jliang70 XiJingPing is also Superman according to state-sponsored Chinese SM accounts.

  • @talkingdrops
    @talkingdrops 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    russia will either support india or will stay neutral but can ever go against India, they are our best friends

    • @theawesomeman9821
      @theawesomeman9821 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Russia supports Russia, its a very selfish power that has no problems betraying others

    • @darthcef
      @darthcef 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      My foot best friend, common russians view india as a toiletless and smelly slumhole

  • @Heyfarmer12
    @Heyfarmer12 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love from India ❤

  • @vinayakbeast4620
    @vinayakbeast4620 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    16:21 Russia will not directly or inderctly involve with india and will remain neutral .....While Iran has slowly deepen its ties with india and due to the immense investment plans that have recently passed Iran will remain neutral

  • @Omen12373
    @Omen12373 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love from India bro keep it up

  • @piyushpathak121
    @piyushpathak121 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    bro that video is kind of old. Both countries made a significant military progress from then. Will not lie Indian Navy and Airforce is less stronger than Chinese Navy and Airforce. It totally depends on a coutnries specific needs.India dont has ample resources like USA nor enemy nation like china and russia. China is developing its navy to compete with USA/Japan.On the other hand India dont have any immediate enemy nation (for context we dont recognise pakistani navy as a Navy). In Land war our forces are comparable.

  • @Noklamalam01Alam-nh2wn
    @Noklamalam01Alam-nh2wn 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    China is 3th powerfull country and india also 4 powerful country in the world 🌎 two countr are strong 😆😆 love from india 🇮🇳 brothers ♥️♥️

    • @Belenor
      @Belenor 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Like Russia was the 2nd?

    • @R6-D2
      @R6-D2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Belenor

    • @kicker3595
      @kicker3595 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But India imports all weapons even bullets, India cannot make weapon, in case of war with China, you will wait for DHL delivery in the second day.

    • @Kbxbigbro808
      @Kbxbigbro808 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China is the 2nd, The hell are u even talking about 3rd exactly?

    • @kicker3595
      @kicker3595 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The conventional war, Chinese is the second, India is the 7th, because India cannot make weapons, they import all weapons and components. nuclear weapon China is the third, India will be the 7th,

  • @hind8273
    @hind8273 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Merry Xmas !

  • @aarushisingh8862
    @aarushisingh8862 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    America never helped india.And we will not forget it.

    • @birdyashiro1226
      @birdyashiro1226 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But the president likes them🐶👅😂

  • @s3p4kner
    @s3p4kner 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    India's recent issues in the Line of Control at the Tibet border should have stripped away any wool from their eyes. India went to the peace table while China built up it's forces, built roads and depots.
    Fun fact; Chinese soldiers, especially officers will spend up to 1/3 of their training time learning about Communism and CCP approved politics. Turns out they were no match for India. But there's nothing the Chinese hate more than embarrassment, they will learn from this.
    India must be ready and be prepared to spend Rupees.

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Indians will never understand the People's Liberation Army of China.

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Indian army is the worst army among all China's opponents. The Chinese War of Resistance Against Japan lasted for 14 years, the Chinese Civil War lasted for 4 years, the Korean War lasted for 3 years, and China's self-defense and counterattack against Vietnam lasted for 2 months. China's 10-year border war with Vietnam. India's understanding of "war" is too narrow. We Chinese believe that India has never experienced a real war. In 1962, in the eyes of the Chinese people, it was not a war, it was just an armed conflict between China and India. In 1962, a brief, just 32 day armed conflict continued India's nightmare for decades. What makes Chinese people laugh is that a border conflict has turned India into a "New Delhi Capital Defense War".

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Indian, do you know the reason why India will always fail? Do you know the reason why the People's Liberation Army of China will always defeat the Indian army?

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I hope Indians can read carefully and experience with their hearts. The huge difference in the founding of China and India determines the biggest difference between India and China. Just look at the modern history of both countries and you will understand. India has been colonized by Britain for more than 200 years. In 1947, Britain experienced World War II, its strength declined significantly, and its status was replaced by the United States. India achieved independence through non violent and non cooperative means. In other words, India's independence has not undergone the test of blood and fire. Such an independent country lacks cohesion, willpower, and a sense of national identity. Now let's talk about China. Since the British defeated the corrupt and incompetent Qing government in 1840, the Chinese people have been living in dire straits. Various disasters and wars followed one after another. At that time, China was very poor and backward, suffering various humiliations. Including the cession of Hong Kong and Macau, Taiwan becoming a Japanese colony, the Eight Nation Alliance setting fire to the Old Summer Palace, and subsequent Japan's comprehensive and brutal invasion of China. In 1931, Japan launched a full-scale invasion of China. From 1931 to 1945, the war lasted for 14 years. The Chinese military and civilians rose up to resist, fought with blood for fourteen years, and suffered 30 million casualties, ultimately achieving victory. Do you know why there are so many casualties in China? There are hundreds of reasons, and I will only give an example of one phenomenon: Chinese troops are in conflict with Japanese troops. Often, if the number of Chinese soldiers participating in the war is 100, they only have 20-30 firearms. The remaining soldiers did not give up resistance or surrender. They bravely fought against the Japanese machine guns and cannons with machetes, steel forks, and wooden sticks until they sacrificed themselves. This spirit of facing death as if returning home and never retreating is the Chinese spirit. 30 million casualties! Do you think this can happen in India? For India, it is zero casualties because their knees are soft. India will soon give up resistance. Do you know why there was the Nanjing Massacre? Due to the desperate resistance of the Chinese military and civilians, they will never surrender or give up. After Japan captured Nanjing, firstly to vent its anger, and secondly to scare off other Chinese soldiers and civilians in resistance. However, the Nanjing Massacre not only did not deter any Chinese people, but also further aroused the resistance of the Chinese people. The establishment of New China has gone through the test of blood and fire. Do you know why the Chinese national flag is red? That's because the establishment of New China was bought with the blood of countless Chinese ancestors, and we Chinese people will always remember it. From 1945 to 1949, during the Chinese Civil War, the Kuomintang fled to Taiwan. Originally, the Chinese people thought they could live a peaceful life they had longed for, but in 1950, the Korean War broke out, lasting three years. The Chinese People's Volunteer Army successfully resisted the northward route of the United States without air superiority, sea superiority, outdated army equipment, and extremely poor logistics, at the cost of losing hundreds of thousands of brave People's Liberation Army soldiers. As for India's unforgettable and shameful 1962 Sino Indian War, in the eyes of us Chinese, it was not a war at all. Firstly, it only took 32 days. Secondly, from 1959 to 1961, China experienced the most difficult three years since the founding of the People's Republic of China, during which many people starved to death. In 1962, India's economy far surpassed that of China. Both the United States, the Soviet Union, and Britain support India. At that time, India implemented a "forward policy" and attacked China with elite troops. We Chinese people really don't want to go to war. The Chinese troops that participated in the war with India in 1962 were ordinary border defense forces, not regular People's Liberation Army. In China, soldiers are known as the "cutest people". There is a Chinese proverb: without a country, there is no home, and soldiers are the backbone of the country. Thank you to our brave soldiers of the People's Liberation Army who are always ready to defend the borders of our motherland. No matter how India develops its military, it cannot surpass China. Whether in the past, present, or future, China can always defeat India. This is determined by the history and culture of both countries. Chinese people value the spirit of dedication and sacrifice. Do not surrender, do not surrender, vow to resist to the death, and face death as if returning on the battlefield. If Chinese soldiers surrender on the battlefield, it would be a great shame, and the spirit of dying rather than giving up is deeply engraved in the bones of every Chinese person. These are all things that Indians do not possess. So, even now or in the future, India will never be able to defeat China. Now, do you think India can stand tall in the world like China? Absolutely impossible.

    • @aarushisingh8862
      @aarushisingh8862 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do you know how many indian are working abroad and they are essentially the economic development sector of those countries.
      Boycott of your plastic products only can lead to a china recession
      Also india is growing.Give us one more decade and you will coming to india in search of your bread n butter

  • @aniruddhamallick2719
    @aniruddhamallick2719 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If there's any country that actually helps India everytime it's Russia... USA umm i don't think unless they have any gains from it

    • @captgaming2134
      @captgaming2134 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      When have they ever helped any country just because they want to help. They always want gains from it

    • @Bothandle70
      @Bothandle70 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They definitely want to destroy China. So they'll help for sure.

    • @devinjenkins4752
      @devinjenkins4752 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@captgaming2134 What did the US gain saving the EU from Russia? What did they gain liberating s/e africa? What did they gain removing Sadam? US gets almost nothing helping others while going billions more in debt so they dont get shit stomped every day 🤣 If it wsnt for the US hald the wrld would be speaking russian and the other hald chinese and nothing else. Lets not sit here and pretend the world doesnt need the US cuz thats the only country holding ww3 off. Taiwan woulda been destroyed, India invaded, EU controlled by russia and no structure in most of african gov.

    • @Kbxbigbro808
      @Kbxbigbro808 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Bothandle70 And will fail at it

  • @Leakhenawatdey
    @Leakhenawatdey 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    stats for china is off. their population now is about 800,000 millions (not 1.4 billions). most of population are old.

  • @edim108
    @edim108 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    16:14 Russia and China aren't as close as most people think. Despite what the outwardly media coverage by both sides might tell, politically they're more of "reluctant partners".
    China needs Russian oil, Russia needs tech from China, but there is no love between them and if things ever got too hot they're both equally ready to throw the other one under the bus...

  • @SaberKingStarfish
    @SaberKingStarfish 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Us,UK... doesn't matter
    . shouldn't we all go ahead with one goal.... Humanity....?????

  • @mikeoxlong3676
    @mikeoxlong3676 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    China has many footsoldiers but it doesn't mean anything if you can't equip, feed, and transport them.

  • @leader7021
    @leader7021 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If you don't know China's military quality,check vedio of 2020 galwan conflict,there you can see Chinese military crying on the way to indian border 😂😂and ,so quality wise india far far better now

    • @jliang70
      @jliang70 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Except those video are fake news from India. On the ground in the recent India and Chinese skirmishes India lost 20 soldiers and China just 4. That is the quality difference between India and China, nothing seems to change since the 1962 war. It is just like Indian tanks like the Arjun 1 and Chinese made 99 type. 75% of Arjun tanks are now effectively biggest and most expensive door stoppers in the world, they are waste metal.

    • @leader7021
      @leader7021 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jliang70 ha ha china only 4 joke of 2024😂 don't waste your time dude,china very scared about reality,thay not revealed exact number, india revealed that's the difference,lol

    • @leader7021
      @leader7021 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jliang70 why today china scared to approch indian border? that's the change,you don't know nothing,shutup, everyone know what's reality

    • @leader7021
      @leader7021 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jliang70 we are far ahead than Chinese crying babies 😂😂

    • @jliang70
      @jliang70 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@leader7021 India reveal the difference, India always got their ass kicked in every war, India can mass about 6 times as many troops near their Chinese border but will still have their ass kicked by PLA by 30000 PLA in a battle just like in 1962.

  • @jliang70
    @jliang70 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If we talking about quality, China only stationed 30000 troops in the border near India compare to 200000, this is sort of quality over quantity that China believe it has over India. India would lose out to China in a war, it is quite questionable considering the test of Indian strength was against Pakistan, India also like China has not fought a war for more than 30 years, its conventional weapons are much inferior to China. For example India's indigenous fighter jet Tejas 1, it was designed to be used on India's aircraft carrier but it was rejected by India navy because it was considered too heavy at 13500 kgs, with operating radius of 400-500 km, can carry a paid load of 3500 kg with maximum speed of 2250km/hr, compare to Chinese J15 which was used on their carrier weighs 17500 kg, with operating radius of 1400-1500 km with max speed of 2940km/hr and capable of carry paid load of 6500 kg.

    • @homa7289
      @homa7289 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A bucket full of shit load information

  • @parthmishra2041
    @parthmishra2041 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    no worries for nucelar as indias BMD system is soon going to operationalise

  • @arungogoi143
    @arungogoi143 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Buddy u don't know about the wars is because your country was against India in many wars -yeah not directly in all of them but directly in a few of them.

  • @sudhirsehgal1143
    @sudhirsehgal1143 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I wish you had done a proper if not thorough research before presenting this video-------the 1967 Nathu la and Cho la clash---was a grim message to China----that 1962 was a aberration in the long run. China had not been able to duplicate at that---and have been beaten back each and every time after that----and the instances have been many. Incidentally--the 9165 Into Pakistan war ended in cease fire because of the USA urging it.India had the upper hand when the ceasefire was put in place.

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      India's understanding of "war" is too narrow. We Chinese believe that India has never experienced a real war. In 1962, in the eyes of the Chinese people, it was not a war, it was just an armed conflict between China and India. In 1962, a brief, just 32 day armed conflict continued India's nightmare for decades. What makes Chinese people laugh is that a border conflict has turned India into a "New Delhi Capital Defense War". So, what happened in 1967? What level, scale, and level of conflict did the 1967 Sino Indian conflict reach? 1966-1976, during the Chinese Cultural Revolution, Indians went to learn about what the Cultural Revolution was. At that time, China didn't care about everything, how could it care about India on the border?

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      1967A: In September 1967, at Nathu La Pass in Yadong County, the Indian army provoked the Chinese People's Liberation Army, which kicked off the 1967 Sino-Indian conflict.
      On September 7, 1967, the Indian army erected a barbed wire fence not far in front of China's Nathu La outpost. The People's Liberation Army border guards stepped forward to argue, but two people were injured by the Indian army.
      This incident aroused the alert of the Tibet Military Region, which ordered Nathu La Pass to be more vigilant and guard against provocations. Taking advantage of their large numbers, the Indians threw stones at the Chinese side with more than 100 people. Later, they actually mixed grenades among the stones.
      After the grenade exploded, many people in the People's Liberation Army were injured. Among them, the border guard company commander Li Yancheng died on the spot.
      At that time, the Chinese government firmly implemented the principle of "not firing the first shot", but the Indian soldiers were aggressive and the Chinese soldiers did not have to be patient.
      The People's Liberation Army immediately launched a counterattack, firing two machine guns at the Indian soldiers, and finally repelled the Indian attack of more than 100 people. After the battle, India suffered more than 60 casualties and fled to Sikkim. The People's Liberation Army pursued the victory and used recoilless guns to blow up all the simple fortifications built by the Indians.

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      1967B: On October 1, 1967, the Indian army provoked a provocation at the "Zho La Pass" on the China-Sikkim border. At noon that day, eight Indian "Gorkha mercenaries" crossed the border and harassed the People's Liberation Army's Cho La Mountain border guard post.
      The Gurkhas are famous mercenaries in the world, and the Gurkha troops of the Indian army are the trump cards in the army with relatively powerful combat capabilities. These Gurkhas were armed with "dog-leg knives" and shouting slogans, and rushed to our army's post.
      During the pushing and shoving, the Indian soldier actually pulled out his pistol and fired, killing two Chinese soldiers. Then China began to counterattack, and all eight Indian Gurkha soldiers who crossed the border were quickly killed.

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      1967C: When the Indian army saw a firefight ahead, the Indian Gurkha Battalion immediately began bombarding the Chinese posts and positions with mortars. The People's Liberation Army's "Yadong Independent Battalion" also immediately fought back, and then began to counterattack the Indian border at 11:50 noon. The front of Erkha soldiers.
      Before this conflict, due to the lessons learned from Nathula Mountain, positions had been built at Chola Pass. Therefore, the People's Liberation Army took its time and used mortars, recoilless rifles, and heavy machine guns to attack the Indian army.
      In the battle that afternoon, the People's Liberation Army's counterattack was overwhelming. In the "Border Area No. 304" across the national border, the fortifications built by the Indian army were destroyed one by one.
      As of 7:50 that night, the People's Liberation Army had eliminated 9 hilltop positions of the Indian army, destroyed a large number of fortifications, and killed a total of 195 Indian troops, 36 of whom died, a large part of them Gurkhas.

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      1967D: After the conflict, the 4-day "67 Conflict" quickly aroused controversy in India because this time India failed again.
      However, in order to appease the Indian people, the Indian government actually glorified these two conflicts as "big victories" and exaggerated the number of Chinese casualties for domestic propaganda.
      Because China did not enter the Indian territory near New Delhi this time, the Indians did not know how the battle was going, so they believed the government's lies. Anyway, the Congress Party's purpose of using the conflict to strengthen its position was achieved.
      Behind the scenes, the Indian army has since become more aware of the depth of China's strength. In the 20 years since this war, the Indian army has never engaged in large-scale provocations on the border.

  • @pankaj-fo3no
    @pankaj-fo3no 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey buddy, share review on Dharmasthala annapoorna.

  • @deepujaat2886
    @deepujaat2886 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    china has conscription...people come and go ...india has voluntary forces with much better morale and dedication.

    • @Br-gv1yl
      @Br-gv1yl 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who told you china has conscription? It's actually quite the opposite. My uncle who's Chinese wanted to join the army but he was not fit enough so they rejected him.

  • @anuraggarhewal3039
    @anuraggarhewal3039 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    actually we are facing china from last 75 years by the time when we are not able we didn't ask for help and now in 2024 what makes you think india needs help with china ...we are alone more than capable to handle those little dragons.....

  • @laxmiphombo3432
    @laxmiphombo3432 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bro Britishers were not fighting in battle ground. Ok actually gurkha's soldiers were fighting in actual battle ground in the side of British. And actually gurkha's soldiers look like Chinese bro their ancestor was a Chinese. Specially gurkha form Nepal. Hitler used to fear with gurkha soldier 🪖, if you want to know about gurkha than search bro ❤❤❤ form Nepal

  • @vedant_garg
    @vedant_garg 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Israel and Russia both are India’s good allies and would never go against it.

  • @williambranch4283
    @williambranch4283 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Himalaya mountains make it very hard for them to attack each other. China mostly tries tu undermine India by subverting Nepal and individual Indian state governments.

  • @prtk_01
    @prtk_01 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wrong Indian map..Pak administered Kashmir and Aksai Chin are disputed territories.. and not part of Pakistan and China respectively.🙄

  • @natureloverwithbikash4702
    @natureloverwithbikash4702 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please use proper map of India🇮🇳

  • @divyam_rathi
    @divyam_rathi 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    TO MY FELLOW INDIANS :-
    *PLEASE BOYCOTT CHINESE PRODUCTS *

  • @theawesomeman9821
    @theawesomeman9821 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Without nukes, it may seem that India has the edge against China with control over the Straits of Mullacass but there are counters to this and India has some of its own problems. China could neutralize the Indian navy with with both arial and aquamarine drones. Some problems with India is that its main fresh water supply is located within China itself which China can turn off whenever it feels like it. This could cause widespread famine in India and even destroy India's ecosystem. The second problem is India's ethnic diversity, many Indian states espicially those from the South that are Non-Hindi speaking and anti-Indo-Aryan. A war could motivate many Indian states to break away, therefore severely weakening India.

  • @mclvlogs9122
    @mclvlogs9122 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is old video bro....😊😊

  • @krishsreshtha7605
    @krishsreshtha7605 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Map is incomplete bro

  • @prithwijitkb4305
    @prithwijitkb4305 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Right......Number doesn't matter, only the quality ,technology and expertise matters in modern warfare, we've seen this in the Russia-Ukraine war ....Diplomatic relations to some extent also matter....(AND NOTHING ELSE MATTERS-- 🎸🎸🎸Jamed Hetfield 😇😇😇)

  • @souvikkoley7562
    @souvikkoley7562 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The map of India is wrong in this video please be change as soon as possible

  • @aslanmuhammed6426
    @aslanmuhammed6426 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For us, Indians, Russia is our dearest friend, A friend in deed. Do you know the history of US, Britain intervention in Indo-Pak war? Learn that first.

  • @diganta171088
    @diganta171088 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dude, your assumption that India would get help from Western countries is just naive. Western world would only agree to help on the condition that India Join Nato+ and that would make India USA's proxy state, which an Independent India wouldn't agree to. Also, a fun fact: During 1971 war, where India was liberating Bangladesh from the brutal occupation and genocide by Pakistan, USA had sent their Nuclear armed 7th fleet to Intimidate India as part of Task Force 74 which had UK in it. It was the Soviet Union which saved India when they intercepted the 7th fleet in Bay of Bengal and UK's Aircraft Carrier in the Arabian Sea. So, yeah reality check for you. Let's see if things change with an Indian origin PM in UK and Indian origin President or VP in USA.

  • @jliang70
    @jliang70 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How did the British soldiers hold out against the Japan in Asian theatre during WW2? 130000 of them surrendered to Japanese in 3 months in 1941. Japanese force was inferior in number to the British force which also had support from Australian and Indian arm force.

  • @devilzplaysyt154
    @devilzplaysyt154 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The map which is been showed in this video is wrong

  • @deepanshusharma806
    @deepanshusharma806 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There are many factors to consider
    1- china's military personnel ( compulsory military service by their youth) where as in india its voluntary.
    2-china is heavily dependent on import and export in case of war cutting or its trade will cripple china economy and will bring china decades back. India will to lose its growth but compare to china india is more self sufficient.
    3- Chinese weapons are famous for there inreliability, all there no. Are given by them and are not tested or confirmed by any outside china
    4- in a situation of war America japan france and others country will support India Russia may stay neutral but will support India on backhand. China has border conflict with more then 17 countries.
    5- until recently india has not invested in there naval forces which they had started although India is still lacking in naval forces by large no. But will cope up in a decade or so.

    • @jliang70
      @jliang70 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      1.China has no compulsory service for their youth and that is incorrect.
      2.China is more self sufficient than India, China is a larger producer of food than India despite having less than land than India. It is also a larger producer of oil than India, China also has the largest stockpile of food, a larger economy which means it can last longer.
      3 In term of unreliability of weapons, no country's defense industry failed as badly as India's. Arjun tank took 40 years to be put on the ground and out of 140 produced 75% of them become the most expensive door stoppers, Indian made aircraft career built like the British one need to be seaworthy for 3 times, using cheap foreign part of save money, Tejas figher jet can't even match 1980's su-27 or a similarly designed J10B. Tejas is India design for Generation 6 fighter jet for this decade and beyond but can't even match planes made in 1980s. How about Indian made ammunition for M777 that destroy the barrel of M777. Talking about Indian made weapons it just putting the tech around the globe then try to put them together, many corners were cut with Indian weapons. Indian made Su30i was packaged into easy assembled packages but Indian assembled Su30 cost 3x as much as Russian made Su30. Got figure how Indian did that. Also how many fighterjets Indian crashed for the last twenty year? A world record.

  • @shyamlalkumar2588
    @shyamlalkumar2588 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brother, india map is wrong in this video.

  • @Belenor
    @Belenor 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Who would win? The world.

  • @vaibhavpawar2458
    @vaibhavpawar2458 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Chainise defense forces not only of paper, & not having any war experience. Bharat armed forces having full of experience. Jay Jawan. Jay Hind. Jay Bharat ❤❤🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

    • @jliang70
      @jliang70 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bharat arm force is the father of the Arjun tanks which became t4he most expensive door stoppers in the world, 40 years in design and ended up as door stoppers in 2 years. Bharat armed forces is so good they can't even beat Pakistan。

  • @hemanth143hemanth9
    @hemanth143hemanth9 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sorry mate if war happened between india and china no Russia and no will support china because, Iran, and Russia are india frndly nations too

  • @vinodsharma7111
    @vinodsharma7111 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Your reaction is very nice and currently Indian army is largest army in the world and India is the largest populated country in the world currently ❤

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The perception of Indians is the same as in 1962, ignorant and superficial.

  • @kajolikrish10
    @kajolikrish10 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If war break between bharat and china then china have to face other countries also special neighbours bharat will be always in eage

  • @vinayreshammiya6128
    @vinayreshammiya6128 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    🛑Russia and Iran would play neutral as they both have good working relationships with India.
    India is diplomatic master of world having connection with both Western Powers and Eastern powers balanced.

  • @VishnuAlappu-
    @VishnuAlappu- 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If they didn't use atomic weapons
    Maybe it's hard to win both side,
    especially India 🙂I'll never forget any loses🤗

  • @jliang70
    @jliang70 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sorry, China beat Vietnam in 1979 war between the two nations, both side lost 30000 each with China taking back the food and weapons they supplied to Vietnam during the Vietnam War, there were more civilian losses on the Vietnamese side. The end result of the war was Vietnamese not only faced international isolation from the US and allies, it also faced isolation from all of its neighbors in South East Asian countries and the economic collapse of Soviet Union push Vietnamese economic recovery further back for another 10 years.

  • @CLAVISMARIS-mk9zp
    @CLAVISMARIS-mk9zp 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    India Victory over china is a dreem that os not yet possible
    If there are left to fight alone

  • @bellapatel3134
    @bellapatel3134 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You need to get facts right. U.K. and USA and western allies have always supported Pakistan. They never helped India. India has always had Russian support.

    • @Bothandle70
      @Bothandle70 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They will if you fight China because they hate them way more than they hate you guys.

  • @HealRecover
    @HealRecover 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    China has a much larger border to defend and China is at loggerheads with most bordering countries, if not all.

    • @Bothandle70
      @Bothandle70 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Philippines will be the only country that'll go against China. Border disputes are not that big of an issue with others.

    • @HealRecover
      @HealRecover 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Bothandle70 how about Taiwan, Vietnam, japan and the 9 dash line?

    • @felix_huang
      @felix_huang 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@HealRecover 台湾是世界上唯一一个不敢主动攻击中国大陆的地方了,至于原因你可以请教台湾人。 九段线就是前中华民国(台湾)制定的,这个写在中华民国(台湾)的宪法里,也是台湾的申索只是印度媒体不报道,印度很关注中国大陆,各种新闻,被中国占了新闻头版,所以你不知道。 日本和中国的钓鱼岛归属,现在实控在中国,钓鱼岛实际规台湾所有,中国大陆只是代替台湾申索主权。 菲律宾可能真的是唯一一个可能挑衅的地方,但是菲律宾的军力中国海警就足够应付了。。。 这种吹捧印度的视频油管上太多了,99%都是吹捧印度的。如果印度真的很强,别人会来吹捧印度嘛,应该是另外一种不想评论不想关注的鄙视吧。 有些现象值得深思,这是好还是坏

  • @user-vw1wq1ld5e
    @user-vw1wq1ld5e หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why so many TH-cam videos about a possible war between China and India. We in China have never seen India as a strategic rival or enemy. Our focus has always been on the Western Pacific not the Himalayas. For us although we have territorial conflicts with India, it will not affect our economic dealings and friendship with India

  • @Hypier
    @Hypier 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Don't show wrong map of India

    • @Misterd12ll
      @Misterd12ll 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Was not even wrong lol

  • @EggplantHarmesan
    @EggplantHarmesan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not if canada gets to india first

  • @brianpeterson754
    @brianpeterson754 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    F that India has done nothing to help our recent Allies our situations!

  • @nihargautam
    @nihargautam 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    India declared of loss of 20 soldiers but china never declared the number...

    • @felix_huang
      @felix_huang 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      有,确实是几个月后才公布。名字人数照片都公布了,不过印度非要在数字后面+0,然后不知道从哪里的小道消息引述的信息,中国隐瞒了伤亡情况,这应该是印度媒体的主流报道。 其实我觉得制作这些视频的人很明显在吹捧印度,个人偏见和主观意见很明显,反正中国所有的都只是数量多质量差而已,然后全是印度人在下面欢呼,讨好印度人。我希望这样的视频制作的越多越好,这样下次冲突印度一定会犯致命的错误。 历史经验就是如此,india style

  • @youngs80s
    @youngs80s 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    china have high quantity ,but Zero Quality of war experience'''....'' India have high skill quality in all field altitude of war on practical ground on field,,,, today India became more n more stronger by logistical defense system etc,,,

  • @advikparbhakar8729
    @advikparbhakar8729 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Watch the new video of india vs china please

  • @devinjenkins4752
    @devinjenkins4752 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lets be honest, India nor China could fight a full on war alone. Russia and the US would be asked to join as well as Chinese supported countries leading to a world war. If so theyd have done it by now and skip the back and forth crying at the boarder for this long.

  • @dwarkaprasadsharma646
    @dwarkaprasadsharma646 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In real India has triple the no. Of chinies atom bomb

  • @The23-33.
    @The23-33. 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Show real map of 🇮🇳

  • @hind8273
    @hind8273 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You're right ! Now the numbers are vastly different. India is not an importer of weapons of war. We are now exporters with maintenance contracts with all major countries. Plus we are the leader of the Global South now. Though we have never invaded a foreign land or sovereign space in the last 5000 years now will we now even though we are the one's who were repeatedly invaded and looted. Indian foereign policy is at it's pinnacle of success with all due to humility. No country with a good sense and sane brain would not want India as a friend. We even helped Turkey in their earthquake eventhough Erdogan repeatedly speaks against India. It's the people of all nations who love India. Even Talibanies love Indians. Afghan soldiers and Police train in India. India builds bridges, roads, dams, and other infrastructure in Afghanistan. Armenia is another such recent friend. Now even UK is scared as our missiles are being bought by Armenia.

    • @SpruceWood-NEG
      @SpruceWood-NEG 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Before 1935, there was no concept of India. It was the British who randomly drew the name of India on the map.

    • @hind8273
      @hind8273 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SpruceWood-NEG yes, ignorance is bliss. But then why do we seek knowledge. Especially of a civilization which is at least 7000 years old.

  • @EvfEnnu
    @EvfEnnu 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Map ids wrong

  • @ashutoshkumarlakra127
    @ashutoshkumarlakra127 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You put wrong map of India correct it .

  • @paraglidingVideos04
    @paraglidingVideos04 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please set your reaction video in left corner... many videos i hv seen this... it seems awkword

  • @abhishektiwari_ind
    @abhishektiwari_ind 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Don't worry brother. 99.99% certainly Russia would be neutral.

  • @sulinlawbreaker7
    @sulinlawbreaker7 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pak surrender to india in 1971 war.. let's watch together bro

  • @frankiedesam8624
    @frankiedesam8624 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It was way more then 20 people who died. China lost a lot more but of course they are goin to lie about it and India lost a little more to. But yea there were way more then 20 people.

  • @sudhanshuranjan4044
    @sudhanshuranjan4044 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love to britain😅🎉

  • @serpentblade8704
    @serpentblade8704 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    India on a whole devises it's strategies on the fact of not receiving any support from any other country in the world, although it would get a lot of support maybe in terms of logistics of food, medicine and some weaponry from israel, Russia(maybe) & France; India both govt and people don't really expect anything much from USA who inherently backstab it's allies. Incidentally The only country said to be a very resposible nuclear power is the only country who has used a nuclear bomb and that is USA.

    • @R6-D2
      @R6-D2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're dilutional if you think Russia might help India vs China.

    • @TooliusTech
      @TooliusTech 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They did during the india china conflict last year.. lots of weapons and supplies :) so yes.. they will help if needed @@R6-D2

    • @Krankenwagen571
      @Krankenwagen571 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russia will be most likely neutral . But our dependency on russiadec

  • @indiantiger.1419
    @indiantiger.1419 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Indian air power is greater than chinaa ......even we have less number of aircrafts.

    • @jliang70
      @jliang70 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      India has more power in crashing their fighter jet. And their most advanced fighter jet is nowhere as advanced as the Chinese ones.

  • @manjushah6207
    @manjushah6207 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    India is far superior in mountain warfare. Also Chinese Soldiers are little emperors.

    • @jliang70
      @jliang70 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Is it by losing the battle to the Chinese.

    • @manjushah6207
      @manjushah6207 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jliang70 China can never win against Bharat. China is all Camouflage. China can only buy corrupt politician but cannot win direct war.

    • @Kbxbigbro808
      @Kbxbigbro808 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@manjushah6207 Keep riding that high horse buddy 🤡

    • @manjushah6207
      @manjushah6207 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Kbxbigbro808 of course Chinese agents won't like it.

  • @ironman5187
    @ironman5187 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sorry i gotta report this video for showing wrong map of India 🇮🇳

  • @blogsinsightindia
    @blogsinsightindia 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Russia in past stand with india. So many times. That's why we like russia more then west

  • @leader7021
    @leader7021 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is not 1962,also indian army resisting pak terrorists very strongly,so this modern day Chinese army no more experience than india to fight!

    • @Bothandle70
      @Bothandle70 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Modern warfare is all about high range weapons, surveillance and air superiority. Fighting experience doesn't really matter.

    • @leader7021
      @leader7021 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Bothandle70 that's a good coward thing!

  • @delmccormack7001
    @delmccormack7001 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why can't we say anything bad about china or Biden on your comments section?