Stemme S12 Motorglider Flight Trial

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 81

  • @theirthereandtheyre2947
    @theirthereandtheyre2947 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If I win the lottery, this would be my hobby.

  • @Rational863
    @Rational863 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Today i was outside and looked up and saw a glider (which is unusual) so i got my binoculars out and stated watching it. After a while i noticed it had a propeller so i said I've got to find out what airplane that is and turns out its the stemme s12. So cool!

  • @cellokid5104
    @cellokid5104 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    It's *THE PERFECT* motor glider

  • @MrZrryan2
    @MrZrryan2 8 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    AWESOME. Expensive as hell, but, simply awesome. 53:1 FFS !

    • @MrZrryan2
      @MrZrryan2 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Uriel Ace You are correct, nobody gives a shit. Now, piss off, troll.

  • @anonymeranonymus1271
    @anonymeranonymus1271 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    one of the best Videos about stemme

  • @KensGarage1
    @KensGarage1 ปีที่แล้ว

    I live close to a small airport and always love hearing and seeing all the planes flying about. Yesterday heard something out of the ordinary, looked up, and saw a glider with an engine. Had to look it up to see what it was. I have no idea if it was this model. Not a pilot but this is pretty cool and interesting.

  • @marinepilot5723
    @marinepilot5723 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Anyone else notice how close that prop came to striking the deck when he lifted the tail on take off roll? Yikes! Not a lot of clearance there

  • @StpBks
    @StpBks 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is a glider. The category term airplane is often used in this video. It is a self-launch glider. A self launch endorsement is needed along w a glider rating. Where you hear the term airplane substitute the word aircraft. The endorsement needed is “Selflaunch” not motorglider. This is a very nice glider.

  • @javiermac5885
    @javiermac5885 6 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    For this price range, they could have coated the wings with solar panels, lithium battery and electric motor !

    • @twistedpixel2558
      @twistedpixel2558 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      They also could have gold plated every inch of it.

    • @DidacticEditions
      @DidacticEditions 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Javier Mac, I agree. It's a glider or it isn't. Maybe up to an electric motor is acceptabla and coherent with the ecological and simple concept of a glider and yes...There is massive area anyway, you must go with solar panels also

    • @apoloromero356
      @apoloromero356 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Nah, combustion engines are best, more powerful and the most important they have more range.

  • @SgfGustafsson
    @SgfGustafsson 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The best of both worlds

  • @v.e.7236
    @v.e.7236 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I'll stay with my ultralights and keep my home, at that price.

  • @joehentalack2443
    @joehentalack2443 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I prefer the installation of a small jet engine and wiring(with a up/down trap system)for 22 K.....Used sailplane(V tail is much better) plus engine mount,32 gal tank,you have the best toy ever.........2 k of Garmin flight system and gages.You're the KING of the skies......!!!!Found my used V tail plane for 9 K,got to work on it,sanding,paint,rubber fuel tank mount and systems,fabrication of the electric trap for engine install,behind the strong but light fiber glass canopy and wiring with a mock-up engine.(on order).......Dyna-mat and light carpeting,heater working with RC batteries,new cables all around,the pleasure of working on "something" that will take you"high"is fantastic,I might install an O2 light system,because I wanna get "crazy" with that bird.......My first goal flight in 8 month is to fly/sail from France,over Spain to Portugal,that season will get me strong "worm" winds above 600 M to 800 M,and a nice pair of Ray-Ban's........

  • @pilotmiami1
    @pilotmiami1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bravo.thenks

  • @cwehbe
    @cwehbe 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wish they made a 4 or 5 seat model. I'd love to own a plane like this but I always fly with my family or friends.

    • @IWLDELJ
      @IWLDELJ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Agreed! It has been bothering me for a while that no one has made a larger capacity glider since the sixties. I wonder what modern techniques could produce!
      In WWII, there were gliders with extreme capacity, but they were not well made and they had terrible glide ratios in the low teens. I'd like to see just ONE glider company at least study a four or more seat glider and I bet we could see some truly impressive stuff, like six seats with a mid to high thirties glide ratio.

  • @lancelotxavier9084
    @lancelotxavier9084 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The mind of a sales person...
    There is nothing wrong with a product until they have a new product they are trying to sell.

  • @RobMcGinley81
    @RobMcGinley81 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why would you need a 914 in a motor glider?

  • @MissMarinaCapri
    @MissMarinaCapri 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    With tax and fees that’ll cost $400,000. US. Who has that kind of money to spend?
    If I did, that powered glider would be a great joy in my life.

    • @abes3925
      @abes3925 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      retired old guys.

    • @mauriceevans6546
      @mauriceevans6546 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My rich mentor always told me that everyone is not as broke as you. Lol

    • @EverHappyDude
      @EverHappyDude 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      A timeshare lease with an added 3rd party rentalplan would work for most people.

    • @ImNotADeeJay
      @ImNotADeeJay 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      A lot of people have that kind of money and much more, especially in America, the question here is: what else could I buy with 400,000 bucks?

  • @IWLDELJ
    @IWLDELJ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The S12 is very expensive, but it is one of the best motorgliders I've ever seen, maybe even one of the best gliders I've seen. Shit's great. Once my yacht is paid for, I am already starting to figure out how to justify a Stemme or similar to my wife (in the 2030 time range).

  • @twistedpixel2558
    @twistedpixel2558 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    369 k???? That's it?? Wow!! I don't know why I don't have 50 of these.

  • @danielkeirsteadsr6939
    @danielkeirsteadsr6939 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just the Glider ? how much is the trailer ?

  • @austinformedude
    @austinformedude 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love everything except for the price! There are in Cirrus SR20 price territory...and you can actually do real work with an SR20.

    • @ryanauburn
      @ryanauburn 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      But can a SR20 thermal bro!

    • @davidalessandri4883
      @davidalessandri4883 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Excellent grasp of the obvious.

    • @Walterwaltraud
      @Walterwaltraud 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Turn the engine off in an SR20 and start sweating, turn it off in a Stemme and have oodles of fun for hours, in silence.

    • @mauriceevans6546
      @mauriceevans6546 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cirrus sr 20 is 500000 plus

    • @luxaly9510
      @luxaly9510 ปีที่แล้ว

      soaring is a sport and it has its own sides ^^ with a cirrus sr20 u do normal flights with this u start then engine off = no fuel consumption for hours if u have thermals and basically fly like many birds do... actually u might encounter some using the same thermal that u use

  • @mikeviard8195
    @mikeviard8195 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I Can not afford it yet, pero me gusta!

  • @ajflyingatyomouth2831
    @ajflyingatyomouth2831 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this in Cayce, South Carolina?

  • @gegegenokitaro
    @gegegenokitaro 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    $400k is well worth for silence.

  • @erwinoberkofler1658
    @erwinoberkofler1658 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But a little bit heavy for a glider?!

    • @martbosman8373
      @martbosman8373 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Gliders usually put water in the wings for better performance up to 56kg/m2.

  • @peachtrees27
    @peachtrees27 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wonder what max range is on that 31 gallons. Do they just fly it across the Atlantic on a tank?

    • @AVweb
      @AVweb  8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The aircraft are assembled in the U.S.-they're crated, not flown, from Germany.

    • @YoursNKR
      @YoursNKR 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      900+NM range at 140 knots true

    • @raul7293
      @raul7293 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was wondering the same...

    • @peterhguk
      @peterhguk 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The straight line distance from Scotland to Iceland ("as the crow flies"), is about 801 miles. You'd be sweating that final glide!

    • @peterhguk
      @peterhguk 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      ...but I have just read it has a range of 945 nautical miles. Still pretty damn nervous-making

  • @planespeaking
    @planespeaking ปีที่แล้ว

    This glider is cool but some design aspects seem a bit shonky. The cockpit feels very beta stage. Hybrid power would solve many issues.

  • @matthewbrooder9414
    @matthewbrooder9414 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can this glider climb in thermals?

  • @Ammad2002
    @Ammad2002 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I need to buy this plane.
    How much price of this plane?

  • @mroger29sh
    @mroger29sh 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    mark r pa thx excellent

  • @alexandervanwyk7669
    @alexandervanwyk7669 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic but not an option due to cost

  • @joehentalack2443
    @joehentalack2443 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    4000 K's with taxes,plus shipping,registration,etc....FUCK THEM,build your own for less than 30 K............

  • @rafaelcaamano3008
    @rafaelcaamano3008 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just yesterday I lost a friend who piloted this plane, a fire caused the fall.
    SANTO DOMINGO. The Dominican Institute of Civil Aviation (IDAC) confirmed this Sunday afternoon by the ultralight aircraft registration N-612ST with two people on board, which took off on the runway 19 of Joaquin Balaguer international airport in Santo Domingo Norte He fell to the ground
    In the accident, the two occupants died, Douglas Bournigal, instructor pilot and renowned cardiologist, and businessman Bruno Vincent. "Being the 1642 UTC aircraft N612ST type S12S Lightweight Glider took off from Joaquín Balaguer international airport with two people on board, with the intention of making a fly over Rancho Arriba, Bonao When returning to the station at the first contact with the tower control was about 12 nautical miles northwest of the station and was instructed to approach the runway in use which was 19 ", is explained in the technical report of the Air Navigation Directorate to the Directorate General of IDAC.
    It was explained in the preliminary technical report that the aircraft was requested to the landing control tower, since it had inconvenience with the radio. "I was authorized to land on runway 19 and" when it was signed, in my opinion, at the last moment we could have seen smoke coming out of the aircraft and we tried to contact him immediately, we did not receive a response, at That moment the aircraft rushed to land, "he says.
    Immediately the emergency plan was executed, locating the place where the aircraft was rushed, going to the units of the firemen, ambulances and rescue teams to provide the corresponding assistance.
    Technicians from the Dominican Institute of Civil Aviation (IDAC) and members of the Commission of Injury Investigation of the Civil Aviation Board (JAC), notified about the accident, proceeded to move to the area to the investigations of the place.
    The Commission of Investigation of Aviation Accidents (CIAA), a burden of the JAC, informed of the fact, issued the guidelines of place to preserve the area of ​​the accident and the evidences that help to determine the causes of the same.

    • @MissMarinaCapri
      @MissMarinaCapri 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rafael Caamaño, a thought, the fire was caused when the pilot overheated the engine compartment because procedures were not implemented to keep engine compartment cool enough?

    • @VedanthB9
      @VedanthB9 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My condolences. May he rest in peace.

  • @markkmiecik9797
    @markkmiecik9797 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This airplane is a tail dragger. It has a tail wheel so it doesn't feel like a tail dragger? Uh, hello? Pick one. It's definitely not a tail dragger.

  • @illla
    @illla 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Still less expensive than most super cars

  • @amonralice2
    @amonralice2 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Doesn't match the joy of the true glider experience.

  • @hdhd5hdhdg159
    @hdhd5hdhdg159 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ive got its boring no challenge, i removed the motor.

  • @tztz1949
    @tztz1949 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It doesn't do anything we'll. Neither power flight or soaring. Buy 2 airplanes and have more fun. Another botique experience for botique thinkers.

  • @mickcarson8504
    @mickcarson8504 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    If that prop runs permanently during the entire flight from take-off and land, then it no longer falls into the category of 'glider'. It becomes a normal, long wing aircraft. Please respect the English language by learning the definition of glider. Stop making your own dictionary. Glider means to fly, glide or soar (all three words) into the warm air thermal uplifts without the aid of a motor. The Glider can be launched by vehicle, towed by airplane, or assisted by means of a propeller. But not to use a motorized propeller to fly indefinitely on power, that's no longer a glider.

    • @dudea3378
      @dudea3378 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Did you even watch the video? You can close the nose and glide it if you want. They do that in the video after climbing.

    • @PabloGonzalez-hv3td
      @PabloGonzalez-hv3td 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      WRONG. "glider" describes aircraft that are designed to operate primarily and efficiently while unpowered. Even if it can get itself to altitude. A 747 isn't designed to turn its engines off when it gets to altitude.

    • @mickcarson8504
      @mickcarson8504 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PabloGonzalez-hv3td
      Wrong, is it? Really? WTF? A glider is named a glider because it glides without power of its own. A glider is designed to soar in the vicinity of an airport or grassy airfield, a glider can soar for hours but cannot travel far. A glider is only a glider without any form of propulsion, props, jets or rockets. A glider can only take the skies with the help of another motorized aircraft specially designed to pull gliders. Once a certain height is reached the tow line is released and hope that the glider will soar with a good thermal uplift that would keep the aircraft soaring for some hours, or less that half hour if the thermal uplift isn't that good. A glider can have a propeller to help launching itself to the required height and must not be used for other purposes other than gliding/soaring over thermals. To use a motorized propulsion continuously to fly long distances it no longer attains the name glider, it becomes an airplane regardless of wing type. As I said, a glider is a glider only if it glides/soars over and between thermal uplifts and is pulled by an aircraft. It has been that way since Germany had their first gliders during WW2.

    • @PabloGonzalez-hv3td
      @PabloGonzalez-hv3td 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mickcarson8504 That doesn't change what the aircraft is DESIGNED to do.

    • @mickcarson8504
      @mickcarson8504 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PabloGonzalez-hv3td
      It means nothing to what you have said. I was referring to the word 'glider'. If it means to glide, it means to soar, because the aircraft is designed to glide in the thermal uplift. It no longer is a glider/soarer when a motor is added that trusts it up towards the clouds.
      In the video I see clips of the aircraft being flown with the use of prop while it is already airborne. That is no gliding, that is normal flight using a motorized propeller. It doesn't matter one bit if the propeller is then retracted. If the propeller is not retracted after reaching the desired height to soar in the thermal uplifts, then that will lose the 'glider' title. It becomes a standard long wings aircraft. I don't need to explain it further. You either agree or go back to school and learn what the word 'glider' means. And I did say respect the English language, stop making your own linguo and then say that it the term we use today, BS!
      GLIDER.
      [ˈɡlʌɪdə]
      NOUN
      .
      1.a light aircraft that is designed to fly without using an engine.
      2.a person or thing that glides.
      "the flying lemur is an efficient glider as well as climber"
      •another term for flying phalanger.

  • @gekkofrog92
    @gekkofrog92 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    May aswell buy a an actually plane. No need for this

    • @DinantRiks
      @DinantRiks 8 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Have you ever even flown a modern high-performance glider cross-country?
      Yes, if you want a normal plane, don't buy a Stemme. But if you want a high performance glider, a side-by-side plane to fly with friends and family and something with the performance and equipment to tour also in poorer weather condition, there is simply nothing that comes close to the Stemme

    • @Superphilipp
      @Superphilipp 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      gekkofrog92, may as well buy 100,000 Big Macs. No need for the best TMG in the world.

    • @slickrock1371
      @slickrock1371 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DinantRiks I wondered how far you could travel in a S12.

    • @IWLDELJ
      @IWLDELJ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@slickrock1371 I wondered this, too. The answer is, it depends on too many variables. BUT, if we assume you catch no lift, no sink, no headwind or tail wind, and no terrain in the way, then I calculated the range to be around 3,300 miles by alternatively motoring up to 12,000 feet and gliding back to 2,000 feet. But you'd be averaging less than 100 miles per hour, so the trip would take like 34 hours and you'd be getting there on fumes.
      This range would be diminished by any number of factors. Optimum gliding conditions could get you faster and further, but ultimately I'd say the very optimistic max range is about 3,300 miles.